Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Mar 2000 16:05:52 +0000
From:      Anatoly Vorobey <mellon@pobox.com>
To:        Heikki Paatela <paatela@st.jyu.fi>
Cc:        chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: M$ one-ups UNIX???
Message-ID:  <20000303160552.A61072@happy.checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <20000302123251.B23719@silmu.st.jyu.fi>; from paatela@st.jyu.fi on Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 12:32:51PM %2B0200
References:  <20000302014342.B327@marder-1> <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000301225919.16032B-100000@shell-1.enteract.com> <20000302123251.B23719@silmu.st.jyu.fi>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 12:32:51PM +0200, Heikki Paatela wrote:
> 
> Seems that man-page from 2.1.7.1-RELEASE still says:
> "HISTORY
>      A ln command appeared in Version 6 AT&T UNIX."
> but 2.2.1 says:
> "HISTORY
>      A ln command appeared in Version 1 AT&T UNIX."
> 
> NetBSD man-pages still say that it appeared in Version 6 - so I am wondering
> which one is correct?

From the revision history in CVS:

1.3
log
@[HISTORY] command appeared in Version 1 AT&T UNIX
Obtained from: A Quarter Century of UNIX, Peter H. Salus, page 41
@

The change occurred between 2.1.7 and 2.2.0.

-- 
Anatoly Vorobey,
mellon@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~mellon/
"Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000303160552.A61072>