From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 22:13:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B35016A4CE; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:13:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB25E43D58; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:13:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DA6F18DC; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:13:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45104-05; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:13:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720F7F1849; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:13:02 -0800 (PST) From: Sean McNeil To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20041214215415.GB29362@ip.net.ua> References: <20041214182153.GA80721@ip.net.ua> <1103049246.21655.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20041214215415.GB29362@ip.net.ua> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VFoSb3OpZgme4QQc9iLG" Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:13:02 -0800 Message-Id: <1103062382.46568.1.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org cc: David O'Brien Subject: Re: ports/emulators/linux_base on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:13:04 -0000 --=-VFoSb3OpZgme4QQc9iLG Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 23:54 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:34:06AM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote: > [...] > > rpm scripts should also be fixed. It seems like a bug in the rpm port > > that no one has addressed. > >=20 > rpm port is not guilty -- running the postinstall script > manually on amd64 returns 1, but on i386 it returns 0: >=20 > Script started on Tue Dec 14 23:10:31 2004 > hammer# /compat/linux/bin/sh > sh-2.04# uname -srm > Linux 2.4.2 amd64 > sh-2.04# /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade=20 > sh-2.04# echo $? > 1 > Script done on Tue Dec 14 23:10:53 2004 Yes, I just got to this point. Thanks for the confirmation. I'm trying to find sources to glibc_post_upgrade to take a look. Cheers, Sean --=-VFoSb3OpZgme4QQc9iLG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBv2VuyQsGN30uGE4RAnVnAJ4qq2CqeRwytVxfYcH/oBlJf+GJlgCdEeDj 3cttsoEKGnLSygRhT31zFeg= =bSg8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VFoSb3OpZgme4QQc9iLG--