Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:08:42 +0100 From: "Tobias C. Berner" <tcberner@freebsd.org> To: Yuri Victorovich <yuri@freebsd.org> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r463107 - in head: astro/accrete devel/mph devel/p5-IPC-MMA devel/p5-Parse-PlainConfig devel/p5-Sub-Alias devel/p5-Sys-Cpu devel/p5-Sys-MemInfo graphics/delaboratory net/yaph sysutils/c... Message-ID: <CAOshKte9_t9y1ekjrqCxCmnDvToHN8onMM1Z16OC==ytE6C6QA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9486f6fe-ecce-8d00-9c24-f93e45dad12d@freebsd.org> References: <201802270455.w1R4tqAS020032@repo.freebsd.org> <20180227092450.cru4nfvh4j2aleuv@atuin.in.mat.cc> <9486f6fe-ecce-8d00-9c24-f93e45dad12d@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yuri Your implicit rights are restricted to updating ports, not "deciding who is maintainer" for a batch of ports -- svn rm-ing audio/ is simple too, please don't do that either :) mfg Tobias On 27 February 2018 at 10:44, Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 02/27/18 01:24, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > You do know that if there is no MX record but there is a A record, it > will be used, right ? Have you checked that this is also not the case? > > > I checked those too, just didn't include this in the message because A and > AAAA records are for historical purposes, and very few systems still use > them. > > Approved by: tcberner (mentor, implicit) > > PS: I doubt very much that this is included in the "simple" updates you > have been granted implicit approval for. > > > This looked pretty simple, just one field is affected. > > > Yuri > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOshKte9_t9y1ekjrqCxCmnDvToHN8onMM1Z16OC==ytE6C6QA>