From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 22 14:45:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BDEBD16A4CE; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:45:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from minerva.int.gov.br (nat.int.gov.br [200.20.196.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3E18843D58; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:45:20 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br)
Received: from [10.0.8.17] (dinf-02 [10.0.8.17])
	by minerva.int.gov.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182ADBE503;
	Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:45:18 -0200 (BRDT)
Message-ID: <41A1FB7D.9000308@jonny.eng.br>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:45:17 -0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki <sf@FreeBSD.org>
References: <16798.12075.465147.307112@canoe.dclg.ca>
	<864qjixdpi.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <864qjixdpi.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca>
Subject: Re: List of fake vs. real SATA drives.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:45:20 -0000

What is the practical diference?  Performance?

FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
> Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
> Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
> Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII
> Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch)
> Any other drives (as far as I know, of course) are ATA drive with
> serial-parallel bridge.
> 
> At Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:43 -0500,
> David Gilbert wrote:
> 
>>Is there anyone compiling a list of "fake" vs. "real" SATA drives?
>>The difference being "fake" drives with ATA-100 electronics and an
>>SATA to ATA conversion chip vs. drives that really support SATA
>>natively?