From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Sep 29 22:49:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CA9C02500 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 22:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb0-x232.google.com (mail-yb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 304CED75 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 22:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb0-x232.google.com with SMTP id z8so22565412ybh.3 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:49:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8kXAbjDPC3u9q/3hAt8+ptYffSmM75+cK+muqvVy1nw=; b=lC6WJf5TW6Fly4IT4jCsmp0gGaZc8cwV5EMWte12QMvgZqjxl00D1C6tgtLmQq1c5F kbrrOxpwlxcsGwkXYYgY00uAkokOiuG7giMMfxhAb0pHyqKpUxpB962p11hfilPfPavO FXUqTKqF5yzbZo5Z3VcWM1poCrvhXkQCMzA7/BHH4px9895novgDXcX6OqQF4AVIHEZj MkKmzudBTckryf6XjoBYLFyvfHVPy0rbpMDL4dOxBOMhLdF0mxTzmmHl/q67a8VTfzpY vuvdkjpgGradISSI2rwINbiSiyvRUe7+FzQPOD/jarewhALuLi0EW445GzKUT2TUbLT2 ekhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8kXAbjDPC3u9q/3hAt8+ptYffSmM75+cK+muqvVy1nw=; b=b9q2v3ocWYAKo7ouOmk2jpBzBWw1d4D7/QJYpG5VGzBheNn5o0EuHqkPYkDHfe3Fox wZalB5ZFQTmJcbJIPwnNqv9ynRm9to7YPTSXCbTI9vtT+MGtgwBsxco6AgxV7h5cpSSj gqC8JsoHEmcqwA1lGdRCx32MU4QOQyNATpo+ZsBTwTk4H7QNQKa0SHKwdVBVCtjodj3C ImpdqjKFLwmjF6r1VA0D97GojR/tFiPwyKxLrT0WRr6tIHrQnBWl+9iR+lApbEvEdqWC vwBEnR3GPGg1XsXsqSR0erQXZwb7NcbwM/Y1yRIjAIaULqP4Q/462yJiPm0KJ/JsS+yv 3x1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkmmO0cBC0TSWzs74haXMaC3ZLtBhl3+VwdPP9FHjuQwN3uAIz3aUXfEvJkLfmLEqc7OCwWucYdU6R9TQ== X-Received: by 10.37.174.140 with SMTP id b12mr1736905ybj.21.1475189364421; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:49:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.161.37 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:49:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <27a9b9f1-27e3-8fd8-13e2-57ef45888342@selasky.org> References: <4300eab5-dafb-bce6-5b58-24d347202e23@selasky.org> <83c6aa1c-59a2-f96a-6841-e8b37801a966@selasky.org> <27a9b9f1-27e3-8fd8-13e2-57ef45888342@selasky.org> From: Zaphod Beeblebrox Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 18:49:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Logitech G510s keyboard fail. To: Hans Petter Selasky Cc: Eitan Adler , FreeBSD Hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 22:49:25 -0000 The largest number it was "skipping" was 993 ... awfully close to 10 bits. was thinking that 16 bits (a short int) was a more appropriate size, was all? On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 09/29/16 17:52, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > >> In this case, 10 bits (1024) would seem right. 16 bits would seem a good >> use of bits. If I were to develop a patch along the lines of 10 or 16 >> bits, is there a good chance it would be adopted? >> >> > It is the opposite. 1024 bits. One bit for every possible key press, so > that you can press multiple keys at the same time. > > --HPS > >