From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 00:31:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EE416A41F for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:31:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john.destefano@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7B843D45 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:31:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john.destefano@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t14so442142wxc for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:31:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eNC3kPfpIAp6Tix46j7lSZZieIUq1fQ4qPBUWwLPpnZuKBM34GuZvwUtgG82BmD/qubpufNfJ9mcK8Sh9ovoHeKb6nDe55y7fgrAJMxWna7TVRk5ZT2Tt71HINGOlX/nEZJyfdMShZer1BbO+tBnbhz++2xHw8mya3+TWUEATj4= Received: by 10.65.236.1 with SMTP id n1mr511167qbr; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.154.4 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:31:16 -0400 From: John DeStefano To: Eric F Crist In-Reply-To: <6FB767AE-D4D7-4C38-90C0-726D48AF5654@secure-computing.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200510271904.17908.ringworm01@gmail.com> <200510280640.04025.ringworm01@gmail.com> <6FB767AE-D4D7-4C38-90C0-726D48AF5654@secure-computing.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade stale dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:31:18 -0000 On 10/28/05, Eric F Crist wrote: > > status report finished > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > =3D=3D > > percentDone-=3D>0 =3D 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=3D>1 / > > TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=3D>1 ) ) > > upgrade 0.3.0_0 info: ignoring apache-2.0.48, reason: failed during > > (2) make > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > update of ports collection complete with either some errors, ignored > > ports or both > > > > > > Unfortunately, this is the most crucial of all, and ironically the one > > about which I've been asking since the beginning. As I mentioned > > earlier, upgrading this port bails consistently with a C callout to > > PEM_F_DEF_CALLBACK. I'd really like to get this port updated, not > > only to finally complete this insane goose chase of updating, but > > because I know that apache-2.0.48 is chock full of vulerabilities. > > > > > > > > > cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 && make deinstall && make clean && make > reinstall > > See what happens. > Talk about strange: # cd /usr/ports/www/apache20/ # make deinstall =3D=3D=3D> Deinstalling for www/apache20 =3D=3D=3D> apache not installed, skipping # make -V PKGNAME apache-2.0.55 # pkg_info | grep apache apache-2.0.48 Version 2 of the extremely popular Apache http server # apachectl -v Server version: Apache/2.0.48 Server built: Nov 19 2003 22:44:21