Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 05:26:47 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, arch@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: xfree4 by default? Message-ID: <20020124052647.C97610@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20011231162222.V2286@windriver.com>; from murray@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 04:22:22PM -0800 References: <20011231174113.O16101@elvis.mu.org> <XFMail.011231154319.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20011231162222.V2286@windriver.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 04:22:22PM -0800, Murray Stokely wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 03:43:19PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > The last time I and others brought this up to Jordan, the tentative plan was to > > switch for 5.0. At this point in the game it is probably a bit late for 4.5, > > however, if you want to head up an effort to get test port builds done after > > the release with 4 as the default and get people to test it out then perhaps a > > switch could be done for 4.6. > > I agree that we should make the switch in -STABLE immediately after > FreeBSD 4.5 is released. I disagree with the timming. We have yet to have a single report that -current packages available on the FTP site are even built against X4. The last time I checked Bento was building against X4, but those packages weren't making it to the FTP server. Unless someone has touched Sysinstall WRT installing X4 since I last did, the support is still incomplete. This needs more flushing out in -current before doing it for -stable. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020124052647.C97610>