Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:27:05 +0200
From:      Milan Obuch <ports@dino.sk>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: splitting courier-authlib into master+slave ports
Message-ID:  <200504191827.05896.ports@dino.sk>
In-Reply-To: <20050419173039.4725638a.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
References:  <20050414111426.775f6afd.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <200504191258.53327.freebsd@redesjm.local> <20050419173039.4725638a.lehmann@ans-netz.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 17:30, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > El Tuesday 19 April 2005 12:49, Oliver Lehmann escribi=F3:
> > > Milan Obuch wrote:
> > > > What about my other suggestion for using configure with one more
> > > > '--cache-file=3D/tmp/courier.cache' argument? This recommendation
> > > > comes
> > >
> > > That is good, I've reduced configure time from 940sec to 572sec. I'll
> > > use it.
> >
> > Hope this may be on time.  Can you consider work this?
> >
> > - maintain couier-auhlib just as a metaport selector.
> > - add a courier-authlib-base port
> > - maintain the courier-authlib-method ports, but working against
> > courier-authlib-base.
>
> That sounds cool. then OPTIONs could be put into the metaport. I'll work
> on this.

I like this idea too. Actually I was trying to formulate tha same. You were=
=20
quicker :)
Milan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504191827.05896.ports>