From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 15 2:57:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles539.castles.com [208.214.165.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD4714DC6 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 02:57:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA00923; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 02:54:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199904150954.CAA00923@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: ulf@Alameda.net Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Stephen McKay , Luoqi Chen , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT4 server 2.5 times faster than Linux In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 Apr 1999 02:44:54 PDT." <19990415024454.B81624@TelcoSucks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 02:54:28 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 02:39:05AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Now, what are the chances that FreeBSD Inc could purchase the services > > > of Mindcraft to test a properly tuned FreeBSD box vs this NT box? > > > > And what are the chances that anyone would trust the results of this > > test after what they did to Linux and Novell? :) Seems to me like it > > would be a waste of the kind of money they're likely to charge (and if > > it were anything less than $10K, I'd be amazed). > > What is the possibility to have a platform simular to the one Mindcraft > used and do our own testing ? Then do not repeat the errors they did. We have the server. We need the 144 workstations and 12 switches. Want to rent us some machines? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message