From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 19:16:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C797C1065677 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:16:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442F58FC19 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl153-194.kln.forthnet.gr [62.1.244.194]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id mB5JGEK6005440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 21:16:19 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB5JGDpI038791; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 21:16:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mB5JGDNW038790; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 21:16:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20081205193446.B2902@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:16:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20081205193446.B2902@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (Wojciech Puchar's message of "Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:35:34 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <871vwmv3er.fsf@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MailScanner-ID: mB5JGEK6005440 X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.005, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.39, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is umtxn X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:16:22 -0000 On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:35:34 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i've got once my asterisk process in umtxn state (as top shows) using > 100% CPU. > > it was still answering calls. > > what's umtxn exactly? A kernel lock operation. ``procstat -k PID'' may show more details about the in-kernel stack of the process that spins on the lock.