From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 15:12:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B693116A417 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from outbound0.mx.meer.net (outbound0.mx.meer.net [209.157.153.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B0B13C45B for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.mx.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m0EFCi7T055312; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:12:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mail2.meer.net (mail2.meer.net [64.13.141.16]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id m0EFChxf034596; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:12:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from gnnbsd.hudson-trading.com.neville-neil.com ([66.150.84.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail2.meer.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0EFCgVu032282; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:12:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:12:42 -0500 Message-ID: <7iir1wtp91.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Andriy Gapon In-Reply-To: <478B3EE0.8040908@icyb.net.ua> References: <478B3EE0.8040908@icyb.net.ua> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (amd64--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdcontrol purpose X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:12:44 -0000 At Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:52:16 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > The following question may seem to be offtopic for this list, but I > think that it's not because it is related not only to cdcontrol utility > itself but also to the CD-ROM drivers. > > The question: should cdcontrol utility be able to eject a mounted disk > (i.e. a filesystem on the disk is mounted) ? > I come down on the side of "separation of concerns" and think that mount should deal with filesystems and that cdcontrol should not. Best, George