Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:19:18 +0000 From: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_socket.c Message-ID: <20050310171917.GQ98930@myrddin.originative.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <86d5u7fn1z.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <422E407B.4080507@portaone.com> <86k6oht386.fsf@xps.des.no> <422F087F.9030906@portaone.com> <20050309.085035.129356491.imp@bsdimp.com> <422F6703.70409@portaone.com> <20050310161607.GO98930@myrddin.originative.co.uk> <86d5u7fn1z.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:06:16PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk> writes: > > Imagine something like Photoshop being written on the most recent > > version of Mac OS X and finding that compatibility only worked > > forward. That would mean that most users out there would have to > > upgrade their OS in order to use the most recent version of Photoshop! > > Yes, that is usually how it goes. I don't believe it does. Can anyone provide real world examples of this happening that we can consider? -- Paul Richards
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050310171917.GQ98930>