Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:04:42 +1200
From:      Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
To:        j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
Cc:        freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Anything like COM in Java?
Message-ID:  <20020628220442.GB49867@grimoire.chen.org.nz>
In-Reply-To: <20020628185157.A33576@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
References:  <20020628122202.A31586@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206281121280.29068-100000@jupiter.linuxengine.net> <20020628185157.A33576@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 06:51:57PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:

[...]
> I'm rather convinced at this point that components dramatically improve
> project organization beyond a certain point.  My current project uses a
> great deal of inheritance, but components really separate functions into
> contract interactions.  How can I do this in Java?  Do Interfaces work
> well enough for this?  Is there a Java binary equivalent, so the binding
> takes place at run-time rather than compile-time?

Would a network classloader do what you want? There'd be still quite a
bit of work to do to handle the interaction.
-- 
Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                             "Beer. Now there's a temporary solution."
                                                       - Homer Simpson

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020628220442.GB49867>