Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 10:19:37 -0600 From: Andy <seahorse51@attbi.com> To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/41701: New port: devel/RT2 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020817101658.00ae8780@mail.seahorse.wsonline.net> In-Reply-To: <200208160850.g7G8o3Pc036751@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
When using RT, it should be noted that it seriously bloats the amount of memory that Apache uses. I would highly recommend that anyone using this program in a production environment, have a separate box to run it on. Andy At 02:50 08/16/2002, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote >The following reply was made to PR ports/41701; it has been noted by GNATS. > >From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> >To: plasma <plasma@freebsd.sinica.edu.tw> >Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org >Subject: Re: ports/41701: New port: devel/RT2 >Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:49:46 +0200 > > On Fri 2002-08-16 (16:33), plasma wrote: > > My testing system is FreeBSD 4.6-release, and it's ok. > > > > The port's problem is, it needs Perl 5.6.1 or greater to run. It needs > > CGI.pm-2.80 or greater, which doesn't exist in ports. You can search > > ports/36887, which proposed a CGI-2.80. I have a wild guess: the reason > > why ports/36887 remains open is CGi-2.80 needs perl 5.6. > > Oops, I meant perl 5.6, not 5.8. Ok, it's what I expected. I have RT > working with system perl with updated modules, installed with the > unshadow option to delete the system modules. But just using perl from > ports is probably much easier and cleaner. If noone else picks this up > soon, I'll try get around to this this weekend. > > Neil > -- > Neil Blakey-Milner > nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20020817101658.00ae8780>