Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 21:44:58 -0400 (EDT) From: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Cc: sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu Subject: Re: Softupdate, is it better than journaling file system? Message-ID: <200107240144.f6O1iwN277507@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sung Nae Cho writes: > I was wondering if there is a real perferomance comparison > between softupdates and journaling file systems No, there is not. Journalling can be very fast when sync writes are required. (for email, NFS, or whatever) At other times, it can be slow. Your mileage may vary. Note that many journalling filesystems have performance benefits that are completely unrelated to journalling. This is simply a result of newer design. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107240144.f6O1iwN277507>