Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:23:09 -0300 From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" <lioux@uol.com.br> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, jedgar@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/27839: Update mail/qpopper to version 4.0.3 Message-ID: <20010703112309.A1105@Fedaykin.here> In-Reply-To: <00e801c0ec35$b57465a0$931576d8@inethouston.net>; from dwcjr@inethouston.net on Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 09:01:16AM -0500 References: <200106021857.f52IvHs09944@freefall.freebsd.org> <200106021950.f52Jowo52032@mail.uic-in.net> <20010603135017.A2289@kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <20010703105641.A753@Fedaykin.here> <00e801c0ec35$b57465a0$931576d8@inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 09:01:16AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > > Nevertheless, we should assign at least a 1 day time out to the > > maintainer before action is taken unless the update can't wait > > (this is one of those gray bikeshed shade areas). At least, a BROKEN > > flag state should be committed in between. > > Actually I think its supposed to be a 2 week period I know it is customary to allow a 2 week period for PRs and maintainer responsiveness. :) I have some commits pending just that. I was talking about those NEEDED fast commits, such as the qpopper one. -- Mario S F Ferreira - UnB - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." lioux at ( freebsd dot org | linf dot unb dot br ) flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010703112309.A1105>