Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:50:33 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __sF Message-ID: <20021103005033.GC30494@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20021102.174008.16163522.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20021102181031.GB28779@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20021102185841.GZ62585@procyon.firepipe.net> <20021102190642.GA28971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20021102.174008.16163522.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 05:40:08PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20021102190642.GA28971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes: > : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1755928+1759974+/usr/local/\ > : www/db/text/2002/freebsd-current/20021013.freebsd-current > > You should be linking against the -stable versions of these items as > well as the libc.so.4. If you don't, then you are asking for > problems. Maybe you can kludge it to make libc.so.5 work, but the > whole reason that it is .5 and not .4 is that it is not binary > compatible with .4, and for more reasons than just __sF. > Fine, I'll try to set up a cross build enviroment. But, we need to then install a complete set of 4.x libraries in /usr/lib/compat. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021103005033.GC30494>