From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Oct 21 10:47:24 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA28646
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 10:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA28630
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 10:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from imb@localhost)
          by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.7.6/BSD4.4) id DAA29279
          Tue, 22 Oct 1996 03:46:30 +1000 (EST)
From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199610211746.DAA29279@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
Subject: Re: ISDN code removal, final warning.
In-Reply-To: <1935.845910399@critter.tfs.com> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Oct 21, 96 05:06:39 pm"
To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 03:46:28 +1000 (EST)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Poul-Henning Kamp writes:

> I agree that putting all the Q931 in userland is a good idea, if nothing
> else, then for the developers of it.

First up, I confess to not knowing much about ISDN at this level so my
question is likely naive at best .. does this layer have anything to do with
selecting the switch type ? The reason I ask is that we have a "standard"
(aka TS-013) which is almost totally unknown outside of Oz .. 

	michael