Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:50:42 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> To: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/93422: Re: ipfw divert rule Message-ID: <ygelkw58dl9.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <200602201721.50781.joao@matik.com.br> References: <200602200300.k1K30TZr050863@freefall.freebsd.org> <200602200845.40948.joao@matik.com.br> <yge3bieyso7.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <200602201721.50781.joao@matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, >>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:21:50 -0300 >>>>> JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> said: joao> On Monday 20 February 2006 12:08, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > It was MFC'ed into RELENG_6: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c.diff?r1=1.76.2. >1&r2=1.76.2.2 > > The change is in meaning of `proto'. So, it is not only for `divert'. joao> good, I see joao> same reason why "... pipe proto ip in|out" does not pipe any more, right? Yes. joao> thank's for clarification but is this to be fixed or will this stay at it is? Yup, current behavior will stay as it is. kern/89472 and this PR are both regression, and there is no good solution to fix both. So, current behavior is trade off to co-exist them. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygelkw58dl9.wl%ume>