From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Apr 15  3: 5:49 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17DB14DC6
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 03:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA14581;
	Thu, 15 Apr 1999 03:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: ulf@Alameda.net
Cc: Stephen McKay <syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au>,
	Luoqi Chen <luoqi@chen.ml.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NT4 server 2.5 times faster than Linux 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 Apr 1999 02:44:54 PDT."
             <19990415024454.B81624@TelcoSucks.org> 
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 03:03:35 -0700
Message-ID: <14579.924170615@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> What is the possibility to have a platform simular to the one Mindcraft
> used and do our own testing ? Then do not repeat the errors they did.

I can loan you a quad Xeon with 1GB of memory if you like (better
bring your truck though) but I can't say much about the actual
benchmarking software you'd use or how you'd simulate (or obtain) the
number of client machines they used.  That remains an open question for
which I've no practical answers.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message