From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Sep 26 16:02:10 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA02815
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:02:10 -0700
Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA02808
          ; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 16:02:08 -0700
Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA10812; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 15:58:47 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
Message-Id: <199509262258.PAA10812@ref.tfs.com>
Subject: Re: "Installation" and "upgrade"
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 15:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, chuckr@eng.umd.edu, richard@harlequin.co.uk,
        freebsd-install@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199509261745.KAA07895@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Sep 26, 95 10:45:35 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 234       
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

but an old fs is stil a valid fs under the new scheme!
> 
> In addition to these changes, the FS in 386BSD did not support the clean
> flag, and the current and immediately previous FS does.
> 
> So the FS /has/ changed somewhat.
>