Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:11:42 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Eirik =?utf-8?q?=C3=98verby?= <ltning@anduin.net> Subject: Re: UFS snapshot weirdness Message-ID: <200802122311.43247.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <79029E40-6E43-4482-8E39-D1DE49C8C53A@anduin.net> References: <79029E40-6E43-4482-8E39-D1DE49C8C53A@anduin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart133648428.REUqbjKGI0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Eirik =D8verby wrote: > I am at a total loss here. Is it re-using the first snapshot I ever > made of this filesystem, even though I've removed it? Didn't I > understand how to create/remove snapshots? Is this a bug? Sure the old md isn't hanging around by mistake or some such? I have had people recover many files using the snapshot tool in ports=20 (plus a small symlink maker for samba access) and haven't noticed=20 issues like this. On the otherhand I find it can take a long time to make a snapshot=20 (during which time no FS access is allowed). =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart133648428.REUqbjKGI0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHsZQH5ZPcIHs/zowRArXIAJ9Rb1nfONYM4SM/PZw5b8N/0v8rYgCfQQ74 VVosoH/fyO/2DevJKVCP/nI= =tEaq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart133648428.REUqbjKGI0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200802122311.43247.doconnor>