From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 02:45:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D661065672; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591CC8FC1D; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB82jIeI065440; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:45:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mB82jIQO065437; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:45:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:45:18 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20081208034441.B65436@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <0016e64ca7d690e38f045d45227d@google.com> <20081205163206.GC25258@kokopelli.hydra> <20081208013850.R1852@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance benchmarks pitting FreeBSD against Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:45:23 -0000 >>> ZFS was very good, but not so much when compared to Linux file systems, >> >> ZFS in your benchmart is similar to UFS. > > Look at the read speed. > > it's faster on that benchmark. but i think low MAXPHYS may be a problem. i changed it to 1MB everywhere.