From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 17 19:17:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58E21065670 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 19:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA218FC13 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 19:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: (qmail 26914 invoked from network); 17 May 2008 19:17:13 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (HELO chuckr.org) (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 17 May 2008 19:17:13 -0000 Message-ID: <482F2D33.1020409@telenix.org> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:08:35 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Torfinn Ingolfsen References: <482B4C79.3030100@telenix.org> <200805142321.08246.freebsd-usb@dino.sk> <482B8D96.2090409@telenix.org> <20080515092911.a4ab2e5b.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <482F2839.2050008@telenix.org> In-Reply-To: <482F2839.2050008@telenix.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB HID parser X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 19:17:14 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chuck Robey wrote: > Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: >> Hello, > >> On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:10:46 -0400 >> Chuck Robey wrote: > >>> After getting no response to any requests for any feedback (like >>> alpha test, but about either the protocol features, OR the >>> accessibility of the UI) I begin to wonder if there is really any >>> interest pool for this. Unless I get at least *some* feedback, I >> Migt I respectfully suggest that no response is because you did the >> "show and tell2 backwards? >> I think you would have gotten more responses if your mail had included >> a link to a place on the net where the tool could be downloaded. > >> I'll use myself as an example: for my personal use, I use and test lots >> of usb devices on FreeBSD (what can I say - I am a gadget freak), so I >> am a bit interested. >> But asking for something in a mail is just so 90'es. >> I prefer to get my programs, source, and information off the net. > >> Just my 20 eurocents (and written with a light twinkle of humor in my >> eye). > > >>> will make it available, but no port. Geeze, it doesn't need one! If >> Any tool worth anything _deserves_ a port. And it helps with exposure, >> as has been said elsewere in this thread. > >>> I'm beginning to wonder if I will have even one FreeBSDer who wants >>> it, Might get rid of a couple of Linux versions. I hate to admit >> I want it - butt _not_ in my mail, please. Put it up somehwere on the >> net and tell us about it. > >>> that it works just as well on Windows, darn it. Maybe I could figure >>> out how to break it for Windows, what do you say? >> I don't care about windows one way or the other (I use it for work >> because Ihave to, not because I like or prefer it). > > OK, let me cover all the suggestions. First, the name, fine, I renamed it to > uhidParser, and the current version is 0.2 (will hit 1.0 if I ever get any > feedback, else it's stay where it is). You can pic up a copy at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~chuckr/vofr/python/uhidParser-0.2.tbz Crap. I typo'ed the url, hat vofr was meant to be "code, so here it is again: http://people.freebsd.org/~chuckr/code/python/uhidParser-0.2.tbz > > Lastly, the port. I have, for a great long time, really felt very wrong, that > items that needed no adaptation (or 'porting') received ports. Once, I even saw > a one liner, truly simple C program get a port, merely to encourage a new > programmer (if I remember right, it converted DOS carriage returns to Unix > ones), and I just felt that such a truly simple thing was abuse of the port > project. That's my own belief. I don't try to push my beliefs upon you, do I? > So, please, don't try it push them on me. When I do a port of something, or > when I write something that needs some help in compiling for non-techies, then > I'll port it, but it's just too simple, it even includes it's own help info, > it's just making no real use of the ports tools to make a port of it. I went > ahead and gave you a URL, I agree there, but not on the port, not for a thing > like this. > > I can't stop you from porting it, I know that, but I wish you wouldn't. It's > just not port material. OK, if you want to continue the argument, do it > privately, I won't respond publicly any more about it. No Flamefests, least not > because of me. _______________________________________________ freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFILy0zz62J6PPcoOkRAgmLAJ4pKPSBwr6RKDCKfSEEVTxiM8s8OQCghyCh LiCY09OLGXg4zTFmvzzegaU= =vtKK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----