Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:02:06 +0200 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_ntfs as normal user Message-ID: <200709142202.07178.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200709131543.06172.cblasius@gmail.com> References: <200709111842.54740.cblasius@gmail.com> <200709131213.46496.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <200709131543.06172.cblasius@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 13 September 2007 15:43:05 Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote: > On Thursday 13 of September 2007 12:13:46 Mel wrote: > > Well, that kills that. Only thing I could think of is setuid mount_ntfs. > > It's really weird, cause I can't get ntfs to mount under normal userid > > even with correct permissions. What you can do shouldn't be possible for > > 2 or 3 reasons. I wonder if it's just ntfs, can you mount another > > partition as normal user? Like, unmount /usr and remount as normal user > > or if you have a less busy partition like /data or whatever. > > Yes, this is only for ntfs. > For ufs or msdosfs partitions (slices) it is not posible. > Only ntfs I can mount and unmount as normal user. > > What I should to do with ntfs_mount? Remove the setuid? The ls didn't list a setuid (you would see -r-sr-x-r-x), I would expect it to for this behavior to occur. I have no idea how this is possible and would see it as security risk if you're not the only user of the machine. -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200709142202.07178.fbsd.questions>