Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:34:51 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Gregory Shapiro <gshapiro@gshapiro.net> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base) Message-ID: <20090922213451.GC84817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20090922204356.GM19207@rugsucker.local> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org> <4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org> <19e9a5dc0909221014o14e88c96ubf32142b85d781d@mail.gmail.com> <20090922173517.GB63149@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20090922200449.GL19207@rugsucker.local> <19e9a5dc0909221329j5757c3f7kc23e94ea8f26a05@mail.gmail.com> <20090922204356.GM19207@rugsucker.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:43:56PM -0700, Gregory Shapiro wrote: > > My apologies for the inconveniences or offenses I might unwittingly > > have caused you. > > Oh no, none necessary at all and I am sorry if my reply to Steve was > misinterpreted. I wanted to both thank Steve for the recognition and > also agree with you -- who I am doesn't enter into the picture, all that > matters is what is best for the project. The only other factor that > enters into the decision making is if sendmail is being actively and > properly maintained. Your last line was my point, which apparentily has been missed. sendmail is actively maintained by you (and Sendmail, Inc.). If sendmail is replaced by dma, will it receive the same level of care? I guess this is considered to be a dubious concern by some. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090922213451.GC84817>