From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 8 18:36:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB1537B502; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 18:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e991Zij13192; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 18:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubba.whistle.com( 207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0) id xma013190; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 18:35:29 -0700 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e991ZTv86008; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 18:35:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <200010090135.e991ZTv86008@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: netgraph help(?) In-Reply-To: <200010090059.LAA14336@tungsten.austclear.com.au> "from Tony Landells at Oct 9, 2000 11:59:44 am" To: Tony Landells Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 18:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tony Landells writes: > I'm trying to set up a multi-ethernet connection between two FreeBSD > boxes so I can evaluate the performance of some of the network things > (like IPSec) without bandwidth being an issue: > > ------------- ------------- > | Machine A | 10.0.0.1 / fxp0-fxp5 \ 10.0.0.2 | Machine B | > | |----------< >----------| | > | | \ (600 Mbps) / | | > ------------- ------------- > > It looks like I need to use netgraph to do this, but I'm having trouble > working out which pieces I need and how to put them together. > > I've looked at getting the user-PPP to manage it as multilink PPPoE, > and I think I've worked out the "server" configuration, but can't > work out what needs to be done on the client to make the multilink > connection. > > Can anyone help me with this? An alternative might be to create a new netgraph node that round-robin's packets across the links. It would be easy to write and pretty short too, and avoids PPP overhead. I can help if you're interested. Hmm... ng_round_robin(4).. might be useful enough to add to FreeBSD anyway. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message