From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Aug  4 09:51:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA10143
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 09:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA10128
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 09:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA04212; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 09:50:19 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199708041650.JAA04212@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Packard Bell?
To: jbryant@tfs.net
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 09:50:19 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199708040405.XAA00726@argus.tfs.net> from "Jim Bryant" at Aug 3, 97 11:05:10 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> BTW: This box does not require the CMD640 hack, and if enabled it will
> panic during the probes.

What about the chipset used on most of the Intel motherboards from
the OEM products division, which has a similar (but incompatible)
bug?  I *did* say "or similar"...


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.