From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 10:57:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3D416A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:57:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from espresso2.syncrontech.com (sync-old.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BF343D1F for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:57:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from guinness.syncrontech.com (guinness.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.57]) by espresso2.syncrontech.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5NAvZhD007297; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:57:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from [62.71.8.37] (coffee.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.37]) by guinness.syncrontech.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5NAvTFQ042526; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:57:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Message-ID: <42BA9594.6080202@suutari.iki.fi> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:57:24 +0300 From: Ari Suutari User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luigi Rizzo References: <42B7B352.8040806@suutari.iki.fi> <42BA6A22.6030506@suutari.iki.fi> <20050623010618.B7580@xorpc.icir.org> <42BA8CA0.3070501@suutari.iki.fi> <20050623033028.A18762@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20050623033028.A18762@xorpc.icir.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible to continue processing rest of rules after match ?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:57:38 -0000 Hi, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Seen the patch, looks good. It's always nice to see how easy it is to > add new options to ipfw2 :) Yes. And what is really nice was the fact that this will solve my real-world problem also very easily (would be great if this patch could find it's way to RELENG_5 eventually). Ipfw2 has good internal design, indeed. Ari S.