Date: 21 Jun 2001 18:07:08 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, James Housley <jim@thehousleys.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: real time Message-ID: <xzp66dpyfyr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <3B31F2AD.E2850728@OARcorp.com> References: <E14vlpX-0008Nr-00@bsdconspiracy.net> <3AF30CF8.FC28EDA1@thehousleys.net> <3AF5D1BF.93588882@softweyr.com> <3B31F2AD.E2850728@OARcorp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com> writes:
> RTEMS is not pure-GPL -- it does allow binary redistribution.
So does "pure GPL", as long as you make the sources available. If you
mean that you can redistribute (potentially modified) RTEMS binaries
without providing the source code, then you've effectively got a
{BSD,MIT,Apache} license (except for a few details about attributions
and the naming of derivative software), and you might as well make the
change in name as well as in function.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp66dpyfyr.fsf>