Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:03:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208154] please increase ARG_MAX Message-ID: <bug-208154-6-hcLPrWvZWq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-208154-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-208154-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208154 --- Comment #2 from Pedro F. Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> --- For reference, here are some values in other systems: /netbsd/sys/sys/syslimits.h #define ARG_MAX (256 * 1024) /* max bytes for an exec function */=20 /illumos-gate/usr/src/head/limits.h #define _ARG_MAX32 1048320 /* max length of args to exec 32-bit progra= m */ #define _ARG_MAX64 2096640 /* max length of args to exec 64-bit progra= m */ #ifdef _LP64 #define ARG_MAX _ARG_MAX64 /* max length of arguments to exec = */ #else /* _LP64 */ #define ARG_MAX _ARG_MAX32 /* max length of arguments to exec = */ #endif /* _LP64 */ ____ I have no opinion, but since our own LibreOffice builds haven't seem to have reached that issue(?), perhaps it's better to avoid a huge bump in that val= ue. Perhaps the _ARG_MAX32 is sufficient for UbuntuBSD? (Cool project BTW). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-208154-6-hcLPrWvZWq>