Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Nov 2008 22:16:25 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Cc:        Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, votdev@gmx.de, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Western Digital hard disks and ATA timeouts
Message-ID:  <77C223A7-C5FC-45DE-BF1A-3BC7982FA582@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <e7db6d980811071112x315d2d94vb305245e799adfce@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20081107071752.GA5842@icarus.home.lan> <e7db6d980811071112x315d2d94vb305245e799adfce@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7Nov, 2008, at 20:12 , Peter Wemm wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Jeremy Chadwick =20
> <koitsu@freebsd.org> wrote:
> [..]
>> As stated, FreeBSD's ATA command timeout is hard-set to 5 seconds, =20=

>> and
>> is not adjustable without editing the ATA code yourself and =20
>> increasing
>> the value.  The FreeNAS folks have made patches available to turn the
>> timeout value into a sysctl.
>>
>> Soren and/or others, please increase this timeout value.  Five =20
>> seconds
>> has now been deemed too aggressive a default.  And please consider
>> migrating the timeout value into a sysctl.
>
> The 5 second timeout has been a problem for quite a while actually.
> I've had a number of instances where I've had to increase it to 20 or
> 30 seconds when recovering from marginal drives.  The longest
> "successful" recovery attempt I've seen was 26 seconds, I believe on a
> Maxtor drive a few years ago.   ("successful" =3D=3D the drive spent =
26
> seconds but eventually successfully read the sector).  Even the IBM
> death star drives could take much longer than 5 seconds to do a
> recovery 5 years ago.  5 seconds has never been a good default.
>
> I think the timeout should be increased to at least 30 seconds.  My
> windows box has a timeout that goes for several minutes.
>
> If there is concern about FreeBSD appearing to hang, I could imagine
> that a console warning message could be printed after 5 seconds.  But
> just say "drive has not yet responded".  But give it more time.
>
> In this day and age we're generally not playing games with udma33 vs
> 66, notched cables, poor CRC support etc.  SATA seems to have
> eliminated all that.  Hmm, it might make sense to increase the timeout
> on SATA connections to 2 or 3 minutes by default.

Actually I do have a patch around that logs the timeout on the console =20=

after the normal timeout (5secs), then just goes on to wait for double =20=

the timeout and log again etc etc, final timeout was IIRC 60 secs but =20=

could be anything.

-S=F8ren=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?77C223A7-C5FC-45DE-BF1A-3BC7982FA582>