Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Apr 2000 10:13:14 -0500
From:      "Jacques A . Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
To:        Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility
Message-ID:  <20000424101314.A76089@spawn.nectar.com>
In-Reply-To: <00042409270400.09338@nomad.dataplex.net>; from rkw@dataplex.net on Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 09:27:04AM -0500
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.21.0004241008370.13917-100000@rac8.wam.umd.edu> <00042409270400.09338@nomad.dataplex.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 09:27:04AM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> On a released system, I may not have the sources to recompile the module.
> It might be a proprietary module that I got with the hardware, for example.

How real is this?  What modules are we talking about?  The last time
I queried on `-stable' for users of third-party modules, only one was
revealed.

Are all modules effected, or only those that use certain interfaces?

> That is why STABLE INTERFACES are so IMPORTANT to USERS.

Agreed.
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000424101314.A76089>