Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 19:41:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@eng.umd.edu> To: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, jkh@time.cdrom.com, richard@harlequin.co.uk, freebsd-install@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Installation" and "upgrade" Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950926194048.12157B-100000@espresso.eng.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <199509262258.PAA10812@ref.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Sep 1995, Julian Elischer wrote: > but an old fs is stil a valid fs under the new scheme! I'm not arguing that for a second, Julian, but is this good advice to give to someone asking questions on -questions? That's the only thing I'm addressing. > > > > In addition to these changes, the FS in 386BSD did not support the clean > > flag, and the current and immediately previous FS does. > > > > So the FS /has/ changed somewhat. > > > > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and n3lxx, both FreeBSD (301) 220-2114 | version 2.2 current -- and great FUN! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.950926194048.12157B-100000>