Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:45:52 +0300 From: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" <emin@mccme.ru> To: "Peter N. M. Hansteen" <peter@bgnett.no> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD's pf and traffic Message-ID: <20050322134552.GD3137@mccme.ru> In-Reply-To: <868y4f6c9i.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> References: <20050320093159.GA3213@mccme.ru> <861xaamf9t.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <20050321071227.GA29429@mccme.ru> <86eke9fn7o.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <20050322120451.GA3137@mccme.ru> <86hdj36fho.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <20050322124220.GB3137@mccme.ru> <86d5tr6e1r.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <20050322130900.GC3137@mccme.ru> <868y4f6c9i.fsf@amidala.datadok.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:28:09PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: " "Eugene M. Minkovskii" <emin@mccme.ru> writes: " " > Unfortunely, this mean, that OpenBSD's pf can not measure " > traffic, because we can not separate incoming and outgoing " > traffic in bidirectional rule. Or we must not use keep state " > feature. " " I think I understand what you mean - you do not want per connection " statistics, you want packets passed by direction, regardless of which " side initiated the traffic, subdivided by pass rule. At the moment I'm " not sure how to put that into pf.conf rules, but you may want to go " where the real pf experts hang out - pf@benzedrine.cx - and see if " there's an angle we haven't thought of. " Yes, now you understand me right. Sorry my bad english :). pf@benzedrine.cx is it mail-list or private e-mail. Does I need to register anywhere before mail to it? -- Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii Сенсорно ваш, Евгений Миньковский
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050322134552.GD3137>