From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 18 21:29:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F2C16A4CE; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:29:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pit.databus.com (p70-227.acedsl.com [66.114.70.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB3F43D46; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:29:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: from pit.databus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pit.databus.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5ILT2bJ055562; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:29:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by pit.databus.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5ILT1UP055561; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:29:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from barney) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:29:01 -0400 From: Barney Wolff To: Alfred Perlstein Message-ID: <20040618212901.GA55428@pit.databus.com> References: <20040618114929.GE58783@empiric.dek.spc.org> <20040618175121.GZ61448@elvis.mu.org> <20040618210840.GA53218@pit.databus.com> <20040618211917.GF61448@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040618211917.GF61448@elvis.mu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 cc: Jonathan Lennox cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/56461: FreeBSD client rpc.lockd incompatible with Linux server rpc.lockd X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:29:05 -0000 On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 02:19:17PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Barney Wolff [040618 14:09] wrote: > > > > Pardon an ignorant question, but what happens to unfortunate people who > > have to talk to both Linux and non-quirky servers at the same time? Is > > there a way to detect what flavor of server you're talking to and adjust > > accordingly? That would be far better than a sysctl. > > Mount option? Can we do that these days? I was really hoping for something not requiring user knowledge and intervention. pf seems to have some automatic os detection features, for example, if I'm reading its manpage correctly. -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.