From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 28 02:51:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750B716A402 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 02:51:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from wjv.com (fl-65-40-24-38.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.40.24.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBFE13C442 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 2007 02:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: from bilver.wjv.com (localhost.wjv.com [127.0.0.1]) by wjv.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l0S2pBhD051832; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:51:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bv@bilver.wjv.com) Received: (from bv@localhost) by bilver.wjv.com (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l0S2p5ck051831; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:51:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bv) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:51:05 -0500 From: Bill Vermillion To: Scot Hetzel Message-ID: <20070128025105.GA50787@wjv.com> References: <20070126161022.GB29530@wjv.com> <20070126171552.GA24490@dan.emsphone.com> <20070127235408.GA50433@wjv.com> <790a9fff0701271723k3e7e57bfncc0addbfd3532f46@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0701271723k3e7e57bfncc0addbfd3532f46@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: W.J.Vermillion / Orlando - Winter Park ReplyTo: bv@wjv.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on bilver.wjv.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: 6.2 buildworld fails with NO_SHARED X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bv@wjv.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 02:51:29 -0000 Deep in the forest in the dark of night on Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 19:23 with a cackle and an evil grin Scot Hetzel cast another eye of newt into the brew and chanted: > On 1/27/07, Bill Vermillion wrote: > >No real problem there, but that brings up another question. > >If - as documented in make.conf(5) - I put use the variable > >NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT it says "set this is you do not want to link > >/bin and /sbin dynamically". > > > >Would that be the way to build statics in /bin and /sbin > >instead of NO_SHARED. > > > I forgot about that option. Using NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT would be the proper > way to build /bin and /sbin statically, and still have the rest > compied dynamically. > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only > slightly bruised. Thanks for confirming that - the NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT not 'no electonrs were harmed :-) Now - I wonder what should be done with the failures encountered when NO_SHARED is used. I suspect it should be cleaned up, if for no reason than to keep messages/queries such as mine from shwoing up. Thanks again. Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com