From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 25 15:10:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from MPI-Softtech.Com (mpi.mpi-softtech.com [208.60.120.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F4137B423 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:10:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dleimbac@earthlink.net) Received: from mpi-plusplus.mpi-softtech.com (dleimbac@mpi-plusplus.mpi-softtech.com [208.60.120.164]); by MPI-Softtech.Com (8.9.3/8.9.3/MPI-Softtech/evision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP; id RAA16000; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 17:09:33 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Misinformation From: Dave Leimbach To: Roelof Osinga Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3AE74244.FA778D6D@nisser.com> References: <200104251242.FAA24271@hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net> <3AE74244.FA778D6D@nisser.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10+cvs.2001.04.16.08.00 (Preview Release) Date: 25 Apr 2001 18:11:12 -0500 Message-Id: <988240276.600.0.camel@mpi-plusplus.mpi-softtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I considered that and thought that perhaps they though OSX was all FreeBSD based. I don't know about SMP Mac OS X yet.... Dave n 25 Apr 2001 23:31:48 +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote: > Dave Leimbach wrote: > > > > I have run into a few people who made the following false claims about > > freeBSD. > > These people sounded like they knew what they were talking about when I > > first spoke with them. > > > > 1) Its based on Mach. > > 2) The SMP in FreeBSD is far superior to even Linux 2.4.x > > > > ... > > Could be they were referring Apple's OS/X. That is FreeBSD but > with a Mach 3 - not sure about the version - kernel. If so then > the SMP remarks might pertain to that kernel. > > Roelof > > -- > Nisser home -- http://nl.Nisser.com/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message