Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:54:42 -0800
From:      "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
To:        "Greg Barniskis" <nalists@scls.lib.wi.us>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "Steven H. Baeighkley" <stevenb@frii.com>
Subject:   Re: serious performance problems with 6.2 Release
Message-ID:  <000b01c751a8$1a266d30$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645>
References:  <45D3A4D7.9000504@frii.com><00ff01c7510e$7452e490$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645>	<eeef1a4c0702150849q76fa6a4cke5e88477189be093@mail.gmail.com><012a01c75128$4d3a5a40$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <45D4A295.6060609@scls.lib.wi.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg Barniskis" <nalists@scls.lib.wi.us>
To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Cc: "Steven H. Baeighkley" <stevenb@frii.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: serious performance problems with 6.2 Release


> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> >>> questions isn't for bugs.  I don't mean to be rude but you won't get
the
> >>> problem fixed by bitching about it on this mailing list.
>
> Good gravy. They're not asking -questions for a fix, they're asking
> for guidance on how to isolate the root cause of the problem. Quoth
> the OP: "*what are we missing?*"
>
> That is perfectly germane for -questions and only /after/ that
> question is answered

Then, post some steps and quit metadiscussing.

 would it be appropriate to use send-pr. Using
> send-pr to submit a poorly defined problem ("too much load") is not
> going to result in a project committer magically finding and fixing
> an unknown OS bug.
>

The original post was not poorly defined.  Certainly not compared to
the average PR.  The only things missing were BIOS and board revisions
and the diagnostic log.

>
> > Steven H. Baeighkley wrote:
> >> If bugs is the correct list then that's where we'll send it. However we
> >> were not initially thinking it was a bug. We were thinking it was a
> >> configuration error on our part.
>
> That's a reasonable assumption actually. Sorry I don't have any
> specific suggestions for you except to second the motion that you
> ignore Ted's assertion that you should give up on -questions. It's
> entirely possible that there's a tunable knob or app compilation
> option that will help you out.
>

If you would care to suggest something I'm sure the OP would be
all ears.  So far you have only posted sheer speculation.

Ted




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000b01c751a8$1a266d30$3c01a8c0>