From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Fri Aug 28 14:36:30 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1643B340D
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:36:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it
 [2.44.121.52])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256
 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BdMbx0b4Fz4fLx
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:36:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 07SEaNKn041415
 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:36:26 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it
 [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu
Subject: Re: Fwd: [package - head-i386-default][astro/opencpn] Failed for
 opencpn-5.0.0_1 in build
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <202008280933.07S9X3J2074396@beefy17.nyi.freebsd.org>
 <e5e84816-f17e-0a04-66d3-3bf8b4857c69@netfence.it>
 <20200828133225.GQ3539@home.opsec.eu>
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Message-ID: <ee33d276-5e17-00bf-1606-763433e19eb3@netfence.it>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:36:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200828133225.GQ3539@home.opsec.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BdMbx0b4Fz4fLx
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none;
 dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.46 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[];
 PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org];
 RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.839];
 TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.28)[-0.275];
 DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none];
 MISSING_TO(2.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.55)[-0.546]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:36:30 -0000

On 2020-08-28 15:32, Kurt Jaeger wrote:

>> Should I consider the following or just trash it, given the warning?
> 
> The 'jail is newer' warning can be ignored, most of the time.

Thanks, I'll look into this, then.

  bye
	av.