Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Jan 1995 21:21:58 +0000 (GMT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
To:        paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards)
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject:   Re: disklabel (1.1.5.1), partitions
Message-ID:  <199501242121.VAA10908@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>
In-Reply-To: <199501242018.UAA01237@isl.cf.ac.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Jan 24, 95 08:18:20 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> In reply to Poul-Henning Kamp who said
> > 
> > > >2117025    1819 cyl 15 heads  77 sec
> > > 
> > Does anybody have anything remotely close to a good reason for not nuking
> > the above printf in sd.c and always report a 32/64/X geometry ??
> > 
> 
> I dislike the idea. If you think the reported disk geometry is causing
> support hassles then just don't report it, don't pretend the disk
> reported something else instead even if that's what we use:-)

How about changing it like this:
OLD:
sd0: 1169MB (2395980 total sec), 2448 cyl, 14 head, 69 sec, bytes/sec 512
NEW:
sd0: 1169MB (2395980 total sec), 2448 cyl, 14 head, VAR sec, bytes/sec 512

One very small change, the other numbers are exact as reported by the
SCSI spec.


-- 
Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company                   Custom computers for FreeBSD



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199501242121.VAA10908>