Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:01:58 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        nate@root.org
Cc:        cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES
Message-ID:  <20031030.120158.98361878.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031030102144.L89089@root.org>
References:  <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031030102144.L89089@root.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20031030102144.L89089@root.org>
            Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes:
: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
: >             M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: > : The "general silliness of compiling SMP for all modules" was a design
: > : decision for SMPng made a long time ago.  That's why there's no longer
: > : a SMP kernel option.
: >
: > Actually, I'm smoking crack here.  Forget I said it.
: >
: > We do, however, don't use the lock prefix on UP kernels.  Instead,
: > modules call the atomic functions, rather than inlining them.
: 
: Whatever you smoke, the bounty is now up to $40, thanks to another donor.
: Let's see some code!

I'll clean up what I have and commit it.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031030.120158.98361878.imp>