From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 31 11:36:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8CDBC99AD for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC2B8B4 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DA491BC99AC; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F0ABC99AB for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E6408B3 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bf3p5-0007tf-Fn; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:36:51 +0200 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:36:51 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Stanislaw Halik Cc: "James A. McGuire" , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3 Message-ID: <20160831113651.GF96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <8d22b341-b1ec-f2b9-d7e0-61564bdb8bb2@misaki.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8d22b341-b1ec-f2b9-d7e0-61564bdb8bb2@misaki.pl> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:36:53 -0000 Hi! > It can sure be changed with a patch. I'd like however to wait for > someone with ports commit bit to comment as to whether that change lies > within the scope of what the ports tree does. My understanding is that > the ports tree generally doesn't introduce new functionality. I suggest to add that feature with a patch and then submit that change upstream so that upstream adds that feature, too. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !