From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 1 17:43:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE253F58; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 17:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu [18.7.68.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5741FF8; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 17:43:12 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 12074423-f79726d000000cc9-3b-52ed30fc5b11 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 5C.EB.03273.CF03DE25; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 12:38:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id s11Hc30R011502; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 12:38:03 -0500 Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s11Hc17i026252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 1 Feb 2014 12:38:03 -0500 Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id s11Hc1Aq016244; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 12:38:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 12:38:01 -0500 (EST) From: Benjamin Kaduk X-X-Sender: kaduk@multics.mit.edu To: Pedro Giffuni Subject: Re: UFS(2) portable driver for other OS In-Reply-To: <52EC5B93.9010709@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <52EC5B93.9010709@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrMIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6novvH4G2Qwa1OHotjj3+yWTycsoTN gcljxqf5LAGMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZm68uZiloYK44+6aJtYFxHVMXIyeHhICJxOYDG9kh bDGJC/fWs3UxcnEICcxmkli74AwLhLOBUeLu5eWsIFVCAgeZJNq7wyHseonn/3eDdbMIaEnM O9/KAmKzCahJPN7bzAoxVVFi86lJzCC2iICyxI+TL8FqmAUMJD78agOzhYHshjtvwOZwCmhL zLk9DyzOK+Ao0dPwmQlil5bElyczwWxRAR2J1funQNUISpyc+QRqpqXEuT/X2SYwCs1CkpqF JLWAkWkVo2xKbpVubmJmTnFqsm5xcmJeXmqRrplebmaJXmpK6SZGcNi6KO9g/HNQ6RCjAAej Eg/vjVOvg4RYE8uKK3MPMUpyMCmJ8k4TexskxJeUn1KZkVicEV9UmpNafIhRgoNZSYTXTx0o x5uSWFmVWpQPk5LmYFES502c8SZISCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIJivDwaEkwXtOH6hRsCg1PbUiLTOn BCHNxMEJMpwHaLilAcjw4oLE3OLMdIj8KUZFKXFeVZCEAEgiozQPrheWVl4xigO9IsybCbKC B5iS4LpfAQ1mAhrcc+A1yOCSRISUVAMjy4zuPrciv+sSVa0taxr3Krtv6WIrvnTkVFBO+qfb K6/eYtFLM9zyO6VgA/fO7YtXZ+WsYtG6qVGwa6fHRLZ/rfuzhTWXVO7Xau50YKt9EHtH//kc E87eRTr353G0vZzwxMAqdlKJovvBO1mlnJv+rAotzFsYaPF967utql96Ym5VOXiUsAgpsRRn JBpqMRcVJwIAIQxnrAYDAAA= Cc: FreeBSD Filesystems X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 17:43:13 -0000 On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > I have some interest in resurrecting the MacOS X UFS1 support and perhaps get > it to a point where it supports softupdates, but I don't know yet sufficient > about kexts. I believe that OS X is moving towards requiring signed kexts; I don't know whether your interest extends to paying for a code-signing certificate. -Ben