From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 25 22:15:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5E26BC for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B068FC1D for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi1so1587106pad.13 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:15:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=8vc2Fq1Q2AfcE/+/Z745cTY+yrAAB5tVzhD8p2hFZNo=; b=AITGH8pRGoYIqJHahAo7HAAfmA2JneFn2DPDW+BGCC5MCll9LbriyZC4gjKnAwtJmW e7HIJJmEnzjbjPOmms0MYAxsE/wQMmBhPS4VWtCQNqG+z9wot/zvLTkUpKRkcZkr99mH RVZNkCGb6apcJugB3/rbvChGmTOwayOFPlfGU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=8vc2Fq1Q2AfcE/+/Z745cTY+yrAAB5tVzhD8p2hFZNo=; b=nRDWq3g+fxlcwCesWyX1GaxFGlxYOE38t8Mk120vPNCXuSQWTxzy7NSVN3TSGeqcAk T6OohDBI0IM5ROFMbriIletjc7LRzyVE0XUfddlns7q/vWdTWIfvPjnCuK85fGUUrc22 9xfUDU0p+EHEXwH4M0NptaWzfdLWv/+/Awu6jslp1GfnkaRt6L8mGyGHkpltP/ye8f6B lYyJLpsf/tjHsVLwTho+o0Xsj+a2fPeVl8gEDQwKq9y72NQbbwSWmySVtL7vYlmkNXBe kcZ1uRW2dv39n+wzkQNgWg7oufsONcaxc16Oby4Vi0jdgvwEg0gCsqKnSJnOuyuPy3va IqKQ== Received: by 10.68.222.105 with SMTP id ql9mr63547869pbc.97.1351203334130; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:15:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.161.163 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:15:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20121025221244.GG3808@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <201210020750.23358.jhb@freebsd.org> <201210021037.27762.jhb@freebsd.org> <127FA63D-8EEE-4616-AE1E-C39469DDCC6A@xcllnt.net> <20121025211522.GA32636@dragon.NUXI.org> <3F52B7C9-A7B7-4E0E-87D0-1E67FE5D0BA7@xcllnt.net> <20121025221244.GG3808@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:15:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmPLxMT/lqXrpW4WQzw0byHMHyp/r89fsLrGiF+ktU8G6vj/HP1gGeujtAKRDe7cJiqqWqf Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Simon J. Gerraty" , Chris Rees , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:15:35 -0000 On 25 October 2012 18:12, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Not much test has been done on the ports tree about it, from what I have tested > so far, except from the :tu :tl difference the ports seems to work ootb with > both bmake and make, I asked obrien to MFC the support for :tl :tu in make(1) to > all available platform which he did. > > Do be able to get the ports tree working with bmake asap, I also asked him to > MFC it to 9.1, from latest reply he got positive answer from re@ about this, but > was waiting for something I don't remember. The ports tree isn't the only concern. We also need to think about upstream users of bmake that relied on :U and the like working as it does now. We will either need to patch them, or implement a USE_OLD_MAKE flag. -- Eitan Adler