Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:07:23 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Culver <culverk@yumyumyum.org> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org>, "Wilkinson,Alex" <Alex.Wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au>, <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: [hardware] Tagged Command Queuing or Larger Cache ? Message-ID: <20021028210709.L61008-100000@alpha.yumyumyum.org> In-Reply-To: <1035857031.77698.57.camel@chowder.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Yes, but my point is that the AA drives are bad, but the BB drives seem > good. I have been using them for a while (~1 year) without trouble. > > I believe the JB drives are much more closely related to the BB drives > (ie effectively identical but with a bigger cache). > > Personally I find that no HD manufacturer has a good reputation - they > have all made trashy drives at one point. Give the general time it takes > for problems to surface vs product lifetimes makes deciding what to buy > a PITA :( > I'll agree with that :-) Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021028210709.L61008-100000>