Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:15:12 -0700
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/gpt gpt.8 gpt.c show.c
Message-ID:  <44CD89F0-FEB9-4F6E-AD2D-B076A36CBABA@xcllnt.net>
In-Reply-To: <449B2F10.2020808@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200606222222.k5MMMWTj017990@repoman.freebsd.org> <449B2F10.2020808@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Jun 22, 2006, at 5:00 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote:

> Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>> marcel      2006-06-22 22:22:32 UTC
>>   FreeBSD src repository
>>   Modified files:
>>     sbin/gpt             gpt.8 gpt.c show.c   Log:
>>   Improve support for Intel based Macs:
>>   o  Accept hfs as partition type.
>>   o  Print Apple HFS partitions using a friendly name.
>
> While we are on subject, I have a patch which makes geom_gpt  
> friendly to the disks partitioned using BootCamp. Basically, for  
> compatibility with non-GPT operating systems, BootCamp creates  
> three records in the MBR: one GPT protective, covering the whole  
> unit, the second one for HFS and the third one for non-Apple  
> operating system. However, since geom_gpt considers protective MBR  
> to be invalid unless it's the only valid MBR record, it doesn't  
> attaches to such disk.
>
> Do you have any objections to lifting such check?

I don't mind changing geom_gpt to work for Intel based Macs, but I'd
like to avoid simply removing checks and thus accepting just about
anything. I'd like to keep the checks strict enough that we don't try
to interpret garbage as partition information. If we allow the PMBR
to have actual partitions, I'd like to extend the checks to cover
the partition information itself. For example, we now check that the
table only has partitions of type 0xEE (if at all). This is a sloppy
test by any standard. If we allow "normal" partitions, I'd like to
enforce that there's exactly 1 partition of type 0xEE and it covers
the whole disk. This way we make sure that it's still pretty much a
PMBR by intend, even though it really is used as an MBR.

Does that sound reasonable to you?

-- 
  Marcel Moolenaar         USPA: A-39004          marcel@xcllnt.net





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44CD89F0-FEB9-4F6E-AD2D-B076A36CBABA>