From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 00:17:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6729D16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:17:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E520E43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 10434 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 00:17:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RDFhlFbiYSk7qVVSmoq5goBBkG7WZMCd/qoPraJUw3fIEZ1L8vzRt5KaGrzvn3XjhPhUpS2kq+cgZIqGObytH/CSQQd5si+CM9EgkxNcSzlo1YUQTGKAZy9x5M78iceNucJhYSfdhYVZaXQe91IPJqr9HH1GbtcS3DdaORa3K4w= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.150?) (mjeays2551@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 00:17:32 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: <1130763624.672.5.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> References: <1130763624.672.5.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1131236251.688.5.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:17:31 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:17:34 -0000 On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:00, Mike Jeays wrote: > On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 02:11, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Mike Jeays [mailto:Mike.Jeays@rogers.com] > > >Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 8:04 PM > > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt > > >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > >Subject: RE: DMA errors > > > > > > > > >On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 19:48, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> Try a different disk drive. > > >> > > >> What motherboard is in use here? > > >> > > >> Ted > > >> > > >> >-----Original Message----- > > >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mike Jeays > > >> >Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 4:28 PM > > >> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > >> >Subject: DMA errors > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >I have a 40GB Maxtor D740X-6L disk, and have been unable to > > >install 5.4 > > >> >or 6.0 on it. I get errors: > > >> > > > >> >ad0: FAILURE WRITE_DMA STATUS=51 error=84 (IRC, > > >> >ABORTED) LBA=.. > > >> > > > >> >as soon as I try to commmit the changes in sysinstall. > > >> > > > >> >I have checked that the IDE cable is the 80-wire type, and cleaned up > > >> >the connections and so on. > > >> > > > >> >I tried installing Ubuntu on this disk, and everything went > > >perfectly. > > >> >(Those guys have done a really great job, by the way). > > >> > > > >> >Is there some configuration trick I have missed? > > >> > > > >> >_______________________________________________ > > >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >> > > > >> >-- > > >> >No virus found in this incoming message. > > >> >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > >> >Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/151 - Release Date: > > >> >10/28/2005 > > >> > > > > > > >It works on at least one other disk, a Western Digital 80GB. The > > >motherboard is as Asus P4S533. > > > > > > > Well I hate to be flippant, but there you have it, problem solved. > > > > I have been doing PC work professionally for over 10 years and > > unprofessionally for at least 10-15 years before that, and ever > > since the IDE interface was invented I've had to deal with > > incompatibilties between the controller and the hard disk. Back > > in the days that the IDE controller chip was on a paddle card I > > used to have a box of them and when running into a problem like > > your doing, I would swap the cards until I got a good combo. This > > was all ISA stuff of course. Once the PCI came out and they > > started putting the controller on motherboard, they only way around > > these problems is to play musical chairs with the disk drives. > > > > And all this was long before FreeBSD, let alone Linux, was even > > a gleam in someone's eye. > > > > Your 40GB Maxtor has some moronic timing incompatibility with the > > IDE chipset that the FreeBSD driver in 5.4/6.0 happens to tickle, > > there's nothing you can do about it. Use your 80GB disk for the > > FreeBSD system or go find some other brand of motherboard for your > > 40GB disk, and things will work fine. > > > > Ted > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thanks for the advice, and that is probably what I will do. > > However, before I bought the 80GB disk, I used to run 4.6 on the Maxtor > 40GB, with no problems. Furthernore, this disk and MB will still run > Ubuntu and Fedora, so it seems that later FreeBSD releases are more > sensitive, or drive the hardware a bit harder. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Thanks for the help - you seem to be correct, Ted. I bought a second Western Digital 80GB disk, and 5.4 installs on this with no problem. The case for the 40 GB Maxtor seems a little odd - it works fine with Ubuntu, the Redmond product, and Fedora Core 3. I even switched it to PIO-only mode, and then 5.4 can be installed - but, as expected, it is very slow - 25 seconds to load KPresenter, for example. Not too useful. It also worked with an earlier FreeBSD, version 4.7 and before. So does FreeBSD drives disks a bit harder than other OSes, and is it still "in spec"? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 00:20:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F2316A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:20:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1EA43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:20:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so147031wxc for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:20:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gQrxeic0t+5RGJsYI+4+N2mz9NYnhfYHluRSW5xPtmUtRnsoC1Ntcah/lT92WmBLoW+243Q9s6lAivCxiw9+Mz0VJInpT8HrvfnoRRkt0PMiaBm48+0/fFByiR8WHHnGJtQPwU307lILyw3CSlhNRQolywrzBdLcqKJtZbbobqo= Received: by 10.70.115.2 with SMTP id n2mr3462416wxc; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:20:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.91.17 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:20:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57416b300511051620j4ebf10b8g1fa669b45c435974@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:20:10 +1100 From: Peter Clutton To: Bob Ababurko In-Reply-To: <436D1B52.4030306@adelphia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <436D1B52.4030306@adelphia.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i need some suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:20:12 -0000 On 11/6/05, Bob Ababurko wrote: > If anyone has any ideas or options of why we should not use plesk, I > would like to hear some refreshing insight other than my brain at the > moment. Well, what reason do you really have for not wanting plesk? That would be a good place to start. If it is just plesk in particular, there are some alternatives. All conspiracy theories aside, most companies such as yourself, do implement something similar. Here are some alternatives: News Article: http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/9/emw282859.htm Actual Site: http://www.raqdevil.com/ Webmin is also an option. Still, like you said, you're not sure what it is wanted for. If you find out first, you will be able to make a sensible case for using it or not using it, or for any of it's alternatives. Hope that helps. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 00:21:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E0D16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:21:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B17043D64 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:21:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 32161 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 00:21:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Content-Type:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=02LOfbUXfXBwk21+hFJWFJGbX8dOOMDUn8GMcM7/1Qw6wC+CiY9nTa9CXTNr0AYgs5njd5u5GnzMLq5VwR9H+7md8TM1KM9x1BrySrkLqkhFd2S4SPlMYfx4tZf0i+fvaC9ygXoR3/EzmEOgKf4a9cXIKuyAfU1RhB+VyqqWui4= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.150?) (mjeays2551@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 00:21:34 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1131236493.688.10.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 19:21:33 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Migrating Evolution folders X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:21:36 -0000 I recently upgraded from 5.3 to 5.4, and this resulted in an upgrade of Evolution from 1.4 to 2.2.1.1. The folders are now held in ~/.evolution instead of ~/evolution, but there seem to be some format incompatibilities. I have not succeeded in migrating my mail yet. I googled for the problem, and there are one or two hints that other people have had problems, but I can't find a solution. If it can't be done automatically, I think I will switch to another mail client, maybe Thunderbird. Any pointers, please? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 00:50:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF9016A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:50:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A99943D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:50:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so119375nzo for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:50:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PitCKVw9xwJtuCTB+Qph2tPFCSccK961+Nf0E97pj2yGt+u3+5WJwqhIxu311BJnr7HWW7L2iFbIiUNd1GzIm+vvFkrrLi1E3fPk4cBSE22wxIfnQnnGhD3UuOLYRKi3NVtJnn+yY0c8C/OIXp+LZdpIUT0JDPsqiOlREXtR8YQ= Received: by 10.36.22.14 with SMTP id 14mr1043701nzv; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:50:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.34 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:50:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 03:50:34 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Dick Hoogendijk In-Reply-To: <20051105232254.GB2519@lothlorien.nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051105232254.GB2519@lothlorien.nagual.st> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: fbsd6 and java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:50:35 -0000 On 11/6/05, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On my 5.4 system I ran java-1.4 > I'm building a clean (brandnew) 6.0-release now ans was wandering if I > should stick with 1.4 or go to the 1.5 java branch. What to do? > > -- > dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE > ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 > + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > 6.0 doesn't change anything, if that's what you're interested in. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 00:52:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A48E16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mohansingh68@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217D143D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mohansingh68@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so119478nzo for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:52:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qz657j0chh2gYlbPWyTiNNw+OyWMc1tfMBeCQnsMAR96bfpt5KNjghXarY+U8xYFCmWnygW+EPUT6ih16QDgIzVohs2u9FcIEDTDOwMaPX3lz+0BLPXgWriwwuxk9elb4XfLa4nJTnknfI0UAvffKDAHWm3MdJPTlVBDYWzHTNA= Received: by 10.36.159.9 with SMTP id h9mr1178903nze; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:52:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.251.67 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:52:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <48d803190511051652i36e5ab4dmedac4ba61f017c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:52:04 +0000 From: Mohan Singh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051105121723.152042d2@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48d803190511042350w3315444er34872cfcd1a6467e@mail.gmail.com> <20051105121723.152042d2@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: suspend works, but resume doesn't on Dell desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:52:05 -0000 On 11/5/05, Fabian Keil wrote: > Mohan Singh wrote: > > How can I get resume to work properly? > > On my ThinkPad R51 I put > > acpi_video_load=3D"YES" > hw.acpi.reset_video=3D0 > hw.syscons.sc_no_suspend_vtswitch=3D1 Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it, but the issue persists. =3D-( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 01:30:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CAE16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 01:30:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (ntweb04.msdihosting.net [66.199.153.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7BF43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 01:30:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([24.201.183.241]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id B3Q02104 for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 20:31:03 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051105202808.02ffdc28@pop.msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 20:30:36 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ian Lord Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: EM Nic driver not up to date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 01:30:45 -0000 Hi, I just did a makeworld and I notice that the em drivers of the distribution is now version 2.1.7 On intel's website, the sources of em version 3.2.15 for freebsd are available, can someone update the sources so that people can benefit from it ? (not sure where to ask for this) For now, I will just recompile them myself... Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 01:50:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E5E16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 01:50:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8214F43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 01:50:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EYZfd-0007SC-Qs for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:50:09 +0100 Received: from r5k101.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.10.101]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:50:09 +0100 Received: from martinkov by r5k101.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:50:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:49:33 +0100 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <20051102011530.0fc51f62.nick@nickwithers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5k101.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050925 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20051102011530.0fc51f62.nick@nickwithers.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: New Logo - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 01:50:28 -0000 Nick Withers wrote: > Well, the winner of the FreeBSD logo competition has been > announced - see http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ > > So what's the verdict then? I have to say I've very impressed, > love the horns! > hello, i wonder where i could see the other entries ?? also, while looking at the above web page, i noticed that spacing (between letters) in "The Power To Serve" is wrong. maybe the font needs more kerning/hinting or whatever. martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 03:43:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB4D16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 03:43:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7C8C43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 03:43:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 66100 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 03:43:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:X-Mailer:thread-index:X-MimeOLE:In-reply-to; b=pArYCeRpqyM4ofk3Cb9eBND2CPjwe5Om9IHGqfiSzSBYi69lgHjSjDftrEZHwI0J+qC9mmwnm/C6kly/n4eh8+wzkXqUfuFBF7IuAcG7yjIZdZ4cWifj3YrrG34lOMhGmSsIvFi43nbxIdsKBQMana5OkA903F6amKnVGHfac9s= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 03:43:43 -0000 From: "Tamouh H." To: Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 22:41:55 -0500 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 thread-index: AcXidJaPPXfePCtdT0KYm1onuu3unwADvhcQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-reply-to: Message-Id: <20051106034344.E7C8C43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: New Logo - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 03:43:45 -0000 > > Well, the winner of the FreeBSD logo competition has been > announced - > > see http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ > > > > So what's the verdict then? I have to say I've very impressed, love > > the horns! I'm sorry to disagree. Is this the best they were able to come up with ? Very disappointing. I prefer the current logo over a ball with two horns!!! and the font used to write FreeBSD is very unprofessional. I'm not a designer to make a better logo, but I know my idea of a logo for an OS would be much much better than this. My two cents... Tamouh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 04:37:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB2116A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 04:37:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3E043D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 04:37:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) Received: from eisenhower.ascendency.net ([67.173.128.145]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20051106043700014006c9d8e>; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 04:37:00 +0000 Received: from Mike8500 (ipcop.localdomain [192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by eisenhower.ascendency.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA64ax2O092504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 22:36:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@ascendency.net) From: "Mike Loiterman" To: Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 22:36:59 -0600 Message-ID: <024401c5e28b$ba11fe00$0401a8c0@Mike8500> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcXii7mDn3A+DV7dTLiXfh+NLJZ1Yw== Subject: Problems with php-4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mike@ascendency.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:37:01 -0000 Just finished upgrading to 6, so I rebuilt all my ports to use the new libraries with portupgrade. All built fine except for two: ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! devel/pear-PEAR (pear-PEAR-1.3.5_1) (unknown build error) * databases/pear-DB (pear-DB-1.7.6,1) ---> Packages processed: 171 done, 0 ignored, 1 skipped and 1 failed php4-DB depends on PEAR, so I fix PEAR, and I fix the other one...I hope. Anyway, when I try to rebuild php4-PEAR this is the error I get: ===> Verifying install for pear in /usr/ports/devel/php4-pear This port requires the CLI or the CGI version of PHP, but you have already installed a conflicting PHP port without them. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/php4-pear. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/pear-Archive_Tar. *** Error code 1 I have mod_php4 installed which is incomptaible with php4-cli / pgp4-cgi...so how can I get around this? ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-442-0992 Email: mike@ascendency.net PGP Key: 0xD1B9D18E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 04:45:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C5D16A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 04:45:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dikshie@ppk.itb.ac.id) Received: from mx-itb.geoph.ITB.ac.id (mx7.ITB.ac.id [167.205.30.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5CF43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 04:44:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dikshie@ppk.itb.ac.id) Received: from antivirus.itb.ac.id (antivirus.ITB.ac.id [167.205.108.137]) by mx-itb.geoph.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with SMTP id E8E2820A5D for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:44:39 +0700 (WIT) Received: from ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id (ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id [167.205.30.228]) by mx-itb.geoph.ITB.ac.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA2920A5C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:44:39 +0700 (WIT) Received: by ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2EC63114D4; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:44:43 +0700 (WIT) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:44:43 +0700 From: Dikshie To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051106044443.GA25274@ppk.itb.ac.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: (FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 i386) X-Uptime: 11:43AM up 1 day, 18:23, 1 user, load averages: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 X-Organization: Pusat Penelitian Kelautan (PPK) X-Location: Labtek VI Building, Institute of Technology, Bandung, Indonesia X-Web-Site: http://ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id/~dikshie X-Yahoo-ID: dikshie X-GnuPG-Key: http://ipv6.ppk.itb.ac.id/gpg/ X-FingerPrint: 19AC 2592 1394 6C96 BABB 9060 50B8 D244 88E3 B55D Subject: sendmail-X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:45:02 -0000 dear all has anyone porting sendmail-X ? (http://www.sendmail.org/sm-X/index.html) regards, -dikshie- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 04:55:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7305916A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 04:55:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from breezenet@verizon.net) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1BF43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 04:55:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from breezenet@verizon.net) Received: from DavidNourian ([71.106.202.134]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0IPI00KTBOCDE2M9@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 22:55:25 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 20:55:13 -0800 From: "DAVID NOURIAN" To: Message-id: <000601c5e28e$469524e0$86ca6a47@DavidNourian> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:55:26 -0000 Hello, 1. If I decide to change to FreeBSD from WinXP, will I still be able to run my windows programs? 2. Can I ran WinXP for my Applications & FreeBSD as a web server? Note: I have 2 HD's on my system & have ordered a 3rd HD to be used as a web server HD . Thanks, David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 05:02:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0196816A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 05:02:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crs.freebsd_mailinglist@users.nuaptools.com) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [217.160.230.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3925343D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 05:02:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crs.freebsd_mailinglist@users.nuaptools.com) Received: from cpe-069-132-090-051.carolina.res.rr.com [69.132.90.51] (helo=crskayak) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrelayus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKp2t-1EYcfI194G-00031y; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:02:00 -0500 Message-ID: <022c01c5e28f$3b370770$b300a8c0@crskayak> From: "Clay" To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:02:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Provags-ID: perfora.net abuse@perfora.net login:b1de210854115b00b7e9e85015d9a091 Subject: 5.4 Generic Kernel - da and scbus...I'm at a loss X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Clay List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 05:02:03 -0000 All, I am a newbie to kernel related things. I'm running 5.4 using the generic kernel. I am problems with using an iPod via USB, and it seems that I may not have device support for sa and scbus in my kernel. I have been searching for a few hours this evening using various criteria and am still unable to get past this issue. It seems like the failure is that a device node /dev/da* for the umass drive isn't be created. Any help would be appreciated. I am going to try booting the 6.0 kernel off CD next and then go from there. Thanks, -Clay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 06:19:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E5616A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:19:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B565243D6A for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:19:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@mkproductions.org) Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (pimout1-int.prodigy.net [207.115.5.65]) by ylpvm43.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jA66JP2C027280 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 01:19:25 -0500 X-ORBL: [66.139.109.225] Received: from [192.168.1.25] (ppp-66-139-109-225.dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net [66.139.109.225]) by pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA66JLeg117448; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 01:19:21 -0500 Message-ID: <436DA064.9080000@mkproductions.org> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:19:16 -0600 From: Mark Kane User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050928) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DAVID NOURIAN References: <000601c5e28e$469524e0$86ca6a47@DavidNourian> In-Reply-To: <000601c5e28e$469524e0$86ca6a47@DavidNourian> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig74CDB1F71E0B18403A7EE892" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:19:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig74CDB1F71E0B18403A7EE892 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DAVID NOURIAN wrote: > Hello, > > 1. If I decide to change to FreeBSD from WinXP, will I still be > able to run my windows programs? Yes and no. There is a program called WINE that does run some Windows applications (http://www.winehq.com/) but not all. That's an ongoing effort. Another option for running Windows software inside FreeBSD would be an emulator like Qemu or VMWare. Then you could actually install Windows to a virtual disk image and run it from inside FBSD. All programs would work but running the virtual Windows would be a bit slower than a real Windows install. When I made the move to FreeBSD from Windows for my desktop machines as well (I had previously only used FBSD for servers), I was worried about all my applications since I do a lot of audio production and streaming. If you already use programs like Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice, X-Chat, gAIM, Audacity, VLC, GIMP, Azureus, etc, then those are available natively for FreeBSD without the need for any emulation. There are also tons of other free and open source programs to run on FreeBSD that can do what you need to do. Check out http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ for a list of 13,500+ applications that you can install very easily. Some examples would be Abiword for word processing, XMMS for a Winamp like media player, gFTP for a graphical FTP client, NVU for a free WYSIWYG web editor, and many many more. > 2. Can I ran WinXP for my Applications & FreeBSD as a web server? > Note: I have 2 HD's on my system & have ordered a 3rd HD to be > used as a web server HD . You could have FreeBSD on one drive and Windows XP on another and dual boot, but that wouldn't be reliable for serving. You could run one of the operating systems inside a virtual machine like Qemu or VMWare, but I personally wouldn't want to run FreeBSD in a VM that is running on Windows....to me that defeats the purpose of having a stable serving OS if the host OS that the VM is running on is unstable. Going the other way, you could have FreeBSD as the main OS and then install Qemu and put the disk image for your WinXP install on that other HD. HTH -Mark --------------enig74CDB1F71E0B18403A7EE892 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbaBplH2ybcmj7I8RAm6nAKCAlMpF1q109eufmUDS2gIjXwetygCeKcoO QqqS0Tu7o/Cc3CoCF4ew1eM= =VExm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig74CDB1F71E0B18403A7EE892-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 07:20:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0EF16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 07:20:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from mail.duras.ro (mail.duras.ro [86.105.56.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56A643D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 07:20:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF50141C1B for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:20:01 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.duras.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03357-08 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:19:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from [86.105.56.194] (ma.plimb.cu.barca.prin.padure.ro [86.105.56.194]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62863F4D8 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:19:56 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <436DAE5E.20507@duras.ro> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:18:54 +0200 From: Mihai Tanasescu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (RedHat) at duras.ro Subject: Kernel option question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 07:20:09 -0000 Hello, I've just recently started to use FreeBSD and I'm having problems with a piece of software that I'm running. That software causes quite a high load on my machine and gets automatically killed after some time. How can I configure FreeBSD not to kill the high cpu consuming tasks taking into account the risk of my machine getting to be unavailable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 08:09:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DA916A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:09:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: from mail.wisphosting.net (talon.airsurfer.ca [66.244.192.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A016F43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:09:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nehe@cruzinternet.com) Received: (qmail 59835 invoked by uid 89); 6 Nov 2005 08:10:52 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 59771, pid: 59821, t: 1.6052s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1146 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from h65-255-228-201.gtcust.grouptelecom.net (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (nehe@cruzinternet.com@65.255.228.201) by mail.wisphosting.net with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 08:10:51 -0000 Message-ID: <436DBA06.5050305@cruzinternet.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 01:08:38 -0700 From: Jeff Molofee User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051106015050.E9E4116A421@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20051106015050.E9E4116A421@hub.freebsd.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail.wisphosting.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=3.0.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mounting DVD, Gnome 2.12 Browse CD and play content X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:09:12 -0000 Hi All, =========== problem 1 =========== I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system for about 2 years now. Started on 4.x... as of last night, I'm now running 6 stable #2. I've noticed over the years, that dvd, has at one point worked, then it stopped working, then it worked, then it stopped working, etc. I'm not really sure what I am doing wrong... so I thought I would ask on this list. If I play a dvd with mplayer dvd://1 it works fine. If I play a dvd with totem dvd://1 it worked fine up until tonight (gstreamer error, not concerned about this right now because I just upgraded and have not had a chance to see what might be wrong). However, if I run totem and try to play a dvd using PLAY DVD, it fails horribly. The error I get is: Failed to retrieve capabilities of device /dev/cd0: Inappropriate ioctl for device I have a sony dvd rw dw-d22a drive. cam is properly configured. permissions and mounting if devfs and fstab are set, my account is in the cdrom group (permission). k3b will burn, and copy discs just fine. mplayer will play discs (minus the menu). I have tried to recompile totem with acd0, dvd, etc... as the DVD device, but it seems to ignore what I enter as a device to use and defaults back to cd0 (which should be fine I would think). Any help would be appreciated. =========== problem 2 =========== I attempted to mount a windows game (on dvd) the other day. I wanted to grab some files from the disc to play with in BSD. when clicking the dvd icon under computer (name I gave my drive). It comes back and says it can't mount the disc. I am able to get a directory of the disc if I mount it with UDF, but I am unable to copy or look at the files. Oddly enough, I can mount a dvd movie and see the contents of the drive just fine. /dev/cd0 /usr/home/{homedir}/DVD cd9660 ro,noauto 0 I attempted to read a windows data dvd that I had burned a few month earlier and noticed I was not able to mount this disc anymore. I was able to mount it in the past (I fairly sure). =========== problem 3 =========== this is not really a problem, but more me not understanding what I am doing. I read on the gnome 2.12 new features list that you can now double click audio tracks on an audio cd, and have them play: / Nautilus is now more tightly integrated with the multimedia tasks you want to do. In addition to the thumbnailing of video and previewing of audio in past releases, Nautilus now offers drag and drop capabilities from audio CDs and the ability to play a track simply by double clicking. /How do you do this? When I try to mount an audio cd (which is what I would assume you would have to do to get a list of its tracks), it fails. Sorry for the long winded post. It's my first post, and would love to get these problems ironed out. Jeff Molofee From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 08:10:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647DE16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:10:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A22C43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:10:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3C75666 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97570-03 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:10:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3D02563A; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051106081002.B3D02563A@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2005-10-16 - 2005-11-05 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:10:20 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 18-Oct : FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 This is the desciption http://freebsddiary.org/freebsd-6.0-rc1.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 08:10:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7686D16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:10:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD57E43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:10:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:10:44 +0100 id 00000033.436DBA84.0000114D Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:10:44 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051106081044.GA4178@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20051105232254.GB2519@lothlorien.nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: fbsd6 and java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:10:46 -0000 On 06 Nov Andrew P. wrote: > On 11/6/05, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > On my 5.4 system I ran java-1.4 > > I'm building a clean (brandnew) 6.0-release now ans was wandering if > > I should stick with 1.4 or go to the 1.5 java branch. What to do? > > > > 6.0 doesn't change anything, if that's what > you're interested in. I know that. What I ment was: as I'm going to recompile / reinstall java anyway on this new machine (a long job) I was in doubt of 1.4 or 1.5 Java-1.4 is older (more mature in fbsd patches). Can the same be said for java15 or are there issues for this version on FreeBSD6? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 08:54:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A18616A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:54:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CCD43D48 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA68sDkE084108; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 02:54:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <436DC496.8060404@daleco.biz> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:53:42 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mike@ascendency.net References: <024401c5e28b$ba11fe00$0401a8c0@Mike8500> In-Reply-To: <024401c5e28b$ba11fe00$0401a8c0@Mike8500> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with php-4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:54:03 -0000 Mike Loiterman wrote: >Just finished upgrading to 6, so I rebuilt all my ports to use the new >libraries with portupgrade. All built fine except for two: > >** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! devel/pear-PEAR (pear-PEAR-1.3.5_1) (unknown build error) > * databases/pear-DB (pear-DB-1.7.6,1) > ---> Packages processed: 171 done, 0 ignored, 1 skipped and 1 failed > >php4-DB depends on PEAR, so I fix PEAR, and I fix the other one...I hope. > >Anyway, when I try to rebuild php4-PEAR this is the error I get: > >===> Verifying install for pear in /usr/ports/devel/php4-pear > This port requires the CLI or the CGI version of PHP, but you have > already installed a conflicting PHP port without them. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/php4-pear. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/pear-Archive_Tar. > *** Error code 1 > >I have mod_php4 installed which is incomptaible with php4-cli / >pgp4-cgi...so how can I get around this? > > I'd install lang/php4, get the CLI, CGI and SAPI module (mod_php) and probably be done with it, then. HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 08:54:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC27E16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:54:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D5B43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:54:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA68shlH084111; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 02:54:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <436DC4B3.5030606@daleco.biz> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:54:11 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mike@ascendency.net References: <024401c5e28b$ba11fe00$0401a8c0@Mike8500> In-Reply-To: <024401c5e28b$ba11fe00$0401a8c0@Mike8500> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with php-4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:54:28 -0000 Mike Loiterman wrote: >Just finished upgrading to 6, so I rebuilt all my ports to use the new >libraries with portupgrade. All built fine except for two: > >** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! devel/pear-PEAR (pear-PEAR-1.3.5_1) (unknown build error) > * databases/pear-DB (pear-DB-1.7.6,1) > ---> Packages processed: 171 done, 0 ignored, 1 skipped and 1 failed > >php4-DB depends on PEAR, so I fix PEAR, and I fix the other one...I hope. > >Anyway, when I try to rebuild php4-PEAR this is the error I get: > >===> Verifying install for pear in /usr/ports/devel/php4-pear > This port requires the CLI or the CGI version of PHP, but you have > already installed a conflicting PHP port without them. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/php4-pear. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/pear-Archive_Tar. > *** Error code 1 > >I have mod_php4 installed which is incomptaible with php4-cli / >pgp4-cgi...so how can I get around this? > > I'd install lang/php4, get the CLI, CGI and SAPI module (mod_php) in that way, and probably be done with it, then. HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 09:15:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706A416A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:15:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE25043D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jA69IAb70322; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 01:18:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Mike Jeays" Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 01:15:17 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1131236251.688.5.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:15:20 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mike Jeays >Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 4:18 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: DMA errors > > >On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 08:00, Mike Jeays wrote: >> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 02:11, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> > >-----Original Message----- >> > >From: Mike Jeays [mailto:Mike.Jeays@rogers.com] >> > >Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 8:04 PM >> > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >> > >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> > >Subject: RE: DMA errors >> > > >> > > >> > >On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 19:48, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> > >> Try a different disk drive. >> > >> >> > >> What motherboard is in use here? >> > >> >> > >> Ted >> > >> >> > >> >-----Original Message----- >> > >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> > >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf >Of Mike Jeays >> > >> >Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 4:28 PM >> > >> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> > >> >Subject: DMA errors >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >I have a 40GB Maxtor D740X-6L disk, and have been unable to >> > >install 5.4 >> > >> >or 6.0 on it. I get errors: >> > >> > >> > >> >ad0: FAILURE WRITE_DMA STATUS=51 >error=84 (IRC, >> > >> >ABORTED) LBA=.. >> > >> > >> > >> >as soon as I try to commmit the changes in sysinstall. >> > >> > >> > >> >I have checked that the IDE cable is the 80-wire type, >and cleaned up >> > >> >the connections and so on. >> > >> > >> > >> >I tried installing Ubuntu on this disk, and everything went >> > >perfectly. >> > >> >(Those guys have done a really great job, by the way). >> > >> > >> > >> >Is there some configuration trick I have missed? >> > >> > >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> > >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> > >> >No virus found in this incoming message. >> > >> >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> > >> >Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/151 - Release Date: >> > >> >10/28/2005 >> > >> > >> > > >> > >It works on at least one other disk, a Western Digital 80GB. The >> > >motherboard is as Asus P4S533. >> > > >> > >> > Well I hate to be flippant, but there you have it, problem solved. >> > >> > I have been doing PC work professionally for over 10 years and >> > unprofessionally for at least 10-15 years before that, and ever >> > since the IDE interface was invented I've had to deal with >> > incompatibilties between the controller and the hard disk. Back >> > in the days that the IDE controller chip was on a paddle card I >> > used to have a box of them and when running into a problem like >> > your doing, I would swap the cards until I got a good combo. This >> > was all ISA stuff of course. Once the PCI came out and they >> > started putting the controller on motherboard, they only way around >> > these problems is to play musical chairs with the disk drives. >> > >> > And all this was long before FreeBSD, let alone Linux, was even >> > a gleam in someone's eye. >> > >> > Your 40GB Maxtor has some moronic timing incompatibility with the >> > IDE chipset that the FreeBSD driver in 5.4/6.0 happens to tickle, >> > there's nothing you can do about it. Use your 80GB disk for the >> > FreeBSD system or go find some other brand of motherboard for your >> > 40GB disk, and things will work fine. >> > >> > Ted >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> Thanks for the advice, and that is probably what I will do. >> >> However, before I bought the 80GB disk, I used to run 4.6 on >the Maxtor >> 40GB, with no problems. Furthernore, this disk and MB will still run >> Ubuntu and Fedora, so it seems that later FreeBSD releases are more >> sensitive, or drive the hardware a bit harder. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >Thanks for the help - you seem to be correct, Ted. I bought a second >Western Digital 80GB disk, and 5.4 installs on this with no problem. > >The case for the 40 GB Maxtor seems a little odd - it works fine with >Ubuntu, the Redmond product, and Fedora Core 3. I even switched it to >PIO-only mode, and then 5.4 can be installed - but, as expected, it is >very slow - 25 seconds to load KPresenter, for example. Not too useful. > >It also worked with an earlier FreeBSD, version 4.7 and before. So does >FreeBSD drives disks a bit harder than other OSes, and is it still "in >spec"? > I think the issue is that you have to view the computer as a true merger of hardware and software, not simply a hardware platform that software happens to be running on. With the FreeBSD OS (and in any OS) there's many abstractive layers to try to decouple as much of the code as possible from the hardware. For example you do not want your network card shutting down just because a particular usermode app runs, that is why the OS prohibits those apps from doing so. But, despite all this what it all boils down to is the CPU of the motherboard is just executing a long sequence of 1's and 0s. In any given moment that code executing in the CPU could be a usermode program, a kernel device driver, or whatever. If the hardware isn't acting as expected, you will get all manner of unexplained, random issues. You could probably install 5.4 fine on that 40GB disk if you put it in a different PC. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 09:21:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9563A16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:21:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net (ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036D743D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:21:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from [10.10.10.210] (ppp211-161.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.122.211.161]) by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jA69LUsX061822 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:51:31 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Message-ID: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:51:29 +1030 From: Matthew Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:21:33 -0000 Hi Having used AIX for about twenty years and Linux for nearly ten, I have decided to start exploring the possibilities of FreeBSD and have just downloaded the ISOs for Version 6/i386. I have attempted to do an install from CD, but am getting failures on quite a few files - possibly because I only had yucky CDRWs to put my ISOs on and the CD drive in the machine is quite old. So, I decided to copy the CD to a directory on another machine, make an NFS share (which works - I checked it from yet another machine), and just use the CD to boot. My problem is that when I select the installation source, Ethernet is not amongst the options (just SLIP, PPP and something else weird). I assume that there's a kernel module not loaded, so after looking further through the documentation, I found that I should be able to put a line in /boot/defaults/loader.conf. Since the installation so far was actually bootable (that's one up on Linux!), I did this. All this did for me was to generate a warning that the module was already loaded. What am I missing? Nowhere, when booting from the first CD, do I get an opportunity to tell it about my network device, although it will ask for all the usual networking details. I'm sure that there must be something quite simple, but is not obvious from the documentation. Cheers M -- Matthew Smith Kadina Business Consultancy, South Australia Work: Personal: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 09:45:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C6916A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:45:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B598243D58 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:45:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA69jdw2048581 ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:45:39 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 166 Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (grobner2.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.119]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA69jbFo000272 ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:45:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA69jbWO010932 ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:45:37 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id jA69jbGd010928; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:45:37 +0100 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:45:37 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Dick Hoogendijk Message-ID: <20051106094537.GB7261@math.jussieu.fr> References: <20051105232254.GB2519@lothlorien.nagual.st> <20051106081044.GA4178@lothlorien.nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20051106081044.GA4178@lothlorien.nagual.st> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:45:39 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 436DD0C3.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: fbsd6 and java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:45:41 -0000 Le 06/11/2005 à 09:10:44+0100, Dick Hoogendijk a écrit > On 06 Nov Andrew P. wrote: > > On 11/6/05, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > > On my 5.4 system I ran java-1.4 > > > I'm building a clean (brandnew) 6.0-release now ans was wandering if > > > I should stick with 1.4 or go to the 1.5 java branch. What to do? > > > > > > > 6.0 doesn't change anything, if that's what > > you're interested in. > > I know that. What I ment was: as I'm going to recompile / reinstall java > anyway on this new machine (a long job) I was in doubt of 1.4 or 1.5 > Java-1.4 is older (more mature in fbsd patches). Can the same be said > for java15 or are there issues for this version on FreeBSD6? > On my server (use by students) I've install both of them (1.4 and 1.5) you can do that too. But IMHO the question is : Why you want use 1.5 if 1.4 is perfect for you ? Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Sun Nov 6 10:44:15 CET 2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 10:17:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1638416A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:17:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFD243D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:17:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so188795wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:17:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RacAsF+uYQexQ8k5R7EiCNAGT0JDV/o+YNYy/KELVvRK93uGS3EZXvr+QX3Mc1D2o/FFySzNmE5k0J4hu5Ak0Syb5ld0gGT2KPw0GQmuqZUtvSIOWo+Vv8BWy5SNXycUz/jLkKVkJMXDIfVIZq9UXqPlz6hnhTdHiSlmYf6w5Xs= Received: by 10.70.117.16 with SMTP id p16mr3814145wxc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:17:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.91.17 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 02:17:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57416b300511060217m161c95b2nb630cc760c1272db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:17:05 +1100 From: Peter Clutton To: Mihai Tanasescu In-Reply-To: <436DAE5E.20507@duras.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <436DAE5E.20507@duras.ro> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel option question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:17:06 -0000 On 11/6/05, Mihai Tanasescu wrote: > I'm having problems with a piece of software that I'm running. > That software causes quite a high load on my machine and gets > automatically killed after some time. > > How can I configure FreeBSD not to kill the high cpu consuming tasks > taking into account the risk of my machine getting to be unavailable. Well first of all what is the program, how did you install it etc. That will help for getting an answer. The reason being FreeBSD doesn't kill a program just for using alot of CPU, i suppose unless it is using up everything and making a nuisance of itself, which the program shouldn't really be reaching that point, so i don't think my next paragraph is the reason, but something to with the program. However the freebsd sheduler does lower the priority for programs that use up their entire slice of CPU time, rather than using some up, and then sleep - ing themselves , or blocking, waiting for something. Therefore a program that is continuous, gets lower and lower priority, while something that has to wait for, say, input, line an interactive program (eg text-editor) gets higher and higher priority (until it enters a while bunch of characters, at which stage it's priority lowers and the process start over again) If you really believe that it's being stopped because of this, look into the nice command (man page) Otherwise, let everybody know what the program is. Also, is it writing any error files? Check your logs, and post any output. Just my thoughts (could be wrong) hope you get some more answers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 10:24:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F5716A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:24:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198C943D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:24:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA6AOv3a096839; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:24:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F3E00B822; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:24:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:24:56 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Matthew Smith Message-ID: <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:24:59 -0000 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 07:51:29PM +1030, Matthew Smith wrote: > Hi >=20 > Having used AIX for about twenty years and Linux for nearly ten, I have > decided to start exploring the possibilities of FreeBSD and have just > downloaded the ISOs for Version 6/i386. >=20 > I have attempted to do an install from CD, but am getting failures on > quite a few files - possibly because I only had yucky CDRWs to put my > ISOs on and the CD drive in the machine is quite old. So, I decided to > copy the CD to a directory on another machine, make an NFS share (which > works - I checked it from yet another machine), and just use the CD to bo= ot. >=20 > My problem is that when I select the installation source, Ethernet is > not amongst the options (just SLIP, PPP and something else weird). That "something weird" could well be the ethernet card. unlike Linux, the ethernet devices are not all named "ethX', but are named after the driver. So it could be e.g. sk0, xl0, dc0, de0, fxp0, vr0 etc. > I assume that there's a kernel module not loaded, so after looking > further through the documentation, I found that I should be able to put > a line in /boot/defaults/loader.conf. Since the installation so far was > actually bootable (that's one up on Linux!), I did this. All this did > for me was to generate a warning that the module was already loaded. Then try to use the "something weird" as the ethernet device. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbdn4EnfvsMMhpyURAlD6AJ9cVO34QJBNiNj2F3xqyxDRswbF/gCfZcF1 /Gdh8c3EkHF2mBv+Ua3UzjQ= =qWrK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 10:25:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D658216A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:25:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from mail.duras.ro (mail.duras.ro [86.105.56.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3064443D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:25:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mihai@duras.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC99417F6; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:25:43 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.duras.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03349-10; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:25:16 +0200 (EET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ma.plimb.cu.barca.prin.padure.ro [86.105.56.194]) by mail.duras.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6793136898; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:25:07 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <436DD9C4.3080605@duras.ro> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:24:04 +0200 From: Mihai Tanasescu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Clutton References: <436DAE5E.20507@duras.ro> <57416b300511060217m161c95b2nb630cc760c1272db@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <57416b300511060217m161c95b2nb630cc760c1272db@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (RedHat) at duras.ro Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel option question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:25:50 -0000 Sorry for not providing more clues. I'm running a Counter-Strike server under linux binary emulation on a : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.60GHz" When there are many players on the server the cpu load looks like this (seen from top): PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 28605 counter 131 0 214M 209M RUN 369:13 86.43% 86.43% hlds_i686 After a while the hlds server just dies. I see no errors in any logs. Afterwards everything is fine, I just restart the counter-strike binary and the cycle repeats itself after a while. The program was installed using the sources provided by Valve and not from the ports directory. Peter Clutton wrote: >On 11/6/05, Mihai Tanasescu wrote: > > >>I'm having problems with a piece of software that I'm running. >>That software causes quite a high load on my machine and gets >>automatically killed after some time. >> >>How can I configure FreeBSD not to kill the high cpu consuming tasks >>taking into account the risk of my machine getting to be unavailable. >> >> > >Well first of all what is the program, how did you install it etc. >That will help for getting an answer. The reason being FreeBSD doesn't >kill a program just for using alot of CPU, i suppose unless it is >using up everything and making a nuisance of itself, which the program >shouldn't really be reaching that point, so i don't think my next >paragraph is the reason, but something to with the program. > >However the freebsd sheduler does lower the priority for programs that >use up their entire slice of CPU time, rather than using some up, and >then sleep - ing themselves , or blocking, waiting for something. >Therefore a program that is continuous, gets lower and lower priority, >while something that has to wait for, say, input, line an interactive >program (eg text-editor) gets higher and higher priority (until it >enters a while bunch of characters, at which stage it's priority >lowers and the process start over again) > >If you really believe that it's being stopped because of this, look >into the nice command (man page) > >Otherwise, let everybody know what the program is. Also, is it writing >any error files? Check your logs, and post any output. > >Just my thoughts (could be wrong) hope you get some more answers. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 10:45:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026CF16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4CB43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from arwen.nagual.st ([192.168.11.29]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:45:03 +0100 id 00000033.436DDEAF.00001436 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:45:21 +0100 From: dick hoogendijk To: fbsdq Message-Id: <20051106114521.6103076b.dick@nagual.st> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.5 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: linux-glib2 unavailable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:45:05 -0000 A lot of linux related ports won't install on my fbsd-6.0 system due to the following error: fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/glib2-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm and try again. *** Error code 1 So, I can't build acroread, realplayer, etc.. Anybody any ideas what's going on? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 11:14:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EA116A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:14:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A5343D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:14:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from arwen.nagual.st ([192.168.11.29]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:14:17 +0100 id 00000033.436DE589.0000148A Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:14:36 +0100 From: dick hoogendijk To: fbsdq Message-Id: <20051106121436.ce8aa2df.dick@nagual.st> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.5 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: linux-glib2 unavailable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:14:19 -0000 A lot of linux related ports won't install on my fbsd-6.0 system due to the following error: fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/glib2-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm and try again. *** Error code 1 So, I can't build acroread, realplayer, etc.. Anybody any ideas what's going on? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 12:02:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E0716A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:02:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mback99@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C839343D58 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:02:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mback99@telia.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (217.211.47.5) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.060.1) (authenticated as u41020144) id 4365DD8D001A6E18 for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:02:07 +0100 Message-ID: <436DF0F3.5020103@telia.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:02:59 +0100 From: Mikael Backman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051009 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: wine and webcam software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:02:13 -0000 Hi. I have installed wine from the ports and run winecfg. When I try to install my webcam software this happens: Installshield works fine and extracts the files but then when the cam setup app setup.exe start to run run wine aborts with a long error message. root: /home/mb #wine z:\\home\\mb\\webcam603enu.exe fixme:richedit:RichEditANSIWndProc WM_SETFONT: stub fixme:advapi:CheckTokenMembership (0x0 0x1ab4d0 0x34f2b8) stub! wine: Unhandled exception (thread 0010), starting debugger... WineDbg starting on pid 0xe Couldn't initiate DbgHelp Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x0041954a in 32-bit code (0x0 04092de). file_set_error: Bad address file_set_error: Bad address In 32 bit mode. Register dump: CS:001f SS:002f DS:002f ES:002f FS:10ff GS:008f EIP:004092de ESP:0062ee5c EBP:0062ee94 EFLAGS:00010246( - 00 -RIZP1) EAX:0000001d EBX:000000ba ECX:00000003 EDX:00000000 ESI:0041954a EDI:00419510 Stack dump: 0x0062ee5c: 00020032 00020032 0062eec0 9c38f418 0x0062ee6c: 00405b58 00009003 0062ee94 00020032 0x0062ee7c: 0062ee8c 9c348454 9c38f200 9c38f418 0x0062ee8c: 0062ef34 9c34b3db 00410390 00420148 0x0062ee9c: 00000001 0041039c 00000000 00410394 0x0062eeac: 00000005 9c38f200 9c38f418 0002002e 021f: sel=10ff base=00112000 limit=00001fff 32-bit rw- Backtrace: file_set_error: Bad address =>1 0x004092de (0x0062ee94) 2 0x00420148 (0x00410390) 3 0x00000000 (0x004024b3) file_set_error: Bad address 0x004092de: andw $0,0x0(%esi) Modules: Module Address Debug info Name (0 modules) Threads: process tid prio (all id:s are in hex) 0000000e (D) C:\Program Files\Logitech\QuickCamWebInstall\AppInst\setup.exe 00000010 0 <== 0000000f 0 00000008 00000009 0 WineDbg terminated on pid 0xe What to do? /Mikael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 12:08:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BE716A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:08:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from budiyt@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F32743D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:08:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from budiyt@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so146394nzo for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:08:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ZSg+/LXr53nJFaKDxPhyEfnNTMnjOIxaDGljvYqTiPjxYW2zVsKHOyHYbQNCNCFGeSfzVFIwQd8cFaFBhzElCFO9NCkRqwjcRP+0R8BxMMdpsXmElAhKnjNZKixtq8z9GyBAivegMb4LoaGSYmNcdEhjkQtpy4TtH6mk6Hp4dvA= Received: by 10.37.13.80 with SMTP id q80mr1117401nzi; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 04:08:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.194.15 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 04:08:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4d4dc3640511060408p2079e13bo12502d2f62680b17@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:08:47 +0700 From: budsz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Realtek ethernet problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:08:48 -0000 Hi folks, I've some problem (can't ping etc) with rl (Realtek Ethernet Manufacture), if I installing that ethernet on the one CPU rl0 & rl, either that ethernet can't be use. Whereas rl0 & rl1 has been active if I use `ifconfig` command. If I droping one of them from my CPU, ethernet can use again. Would you give information with this situation TIA -- budsz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 12:42:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D94916A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from merke.itea.ntnu.no (merke.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EA343D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:42:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merke.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3398613C422 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:42:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by merke.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:42:36 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 38470 invoked by uid 1001); 6 Nov 2005 13:42:36 +0100 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 13:42:36 +0100 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:42:35 +0100 (CET) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@maren.thelosingend.net To: Mohan Singh In-Reply-To: <48d803190511051652i36e5ab4dmedac4ba61f017c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20051106133412.A36825@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <48d803190511042350w3315444er34872cfcd1a6467e@mail.gmail.com> <20051105121723.152042d2@localhost> <48d803190511051652i36e5ab4dmedac4ba61f017c9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspend works, but resume doesn't on Dell desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:42:45 -0000 * Mohan Singh [2005-11-06 00:52 -0000] > > > How can I get resume to work properly? > > > > On my ThinkPad R51 I put > > > > acpi_video_load="YES" > > hw.acpi.reset_video=0 > > hw.syscons.sc_no_suspend_vtswitch=1 > > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it, but the issue persists. =-( I have a Dell Latitude X300, and was experiencing a similar problem. I just tried the suggested fix, and it did get me alot closer. I was able to resume my laptop from suspense, but the screen went garbled. After some googling, I tried increasing hw.acpi.sleep_delay, and found a value of 3 to be the magic that was missing. Now, I just have one more problem: When closing the lid on my laptop, while in X, and opening it again, the ~50 topmost pixels are garbled and the entire view is shifted down. Switching to console and back seem to fix it. Any takes? Svein Halvor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 12:57:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F8616A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:57:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AE743D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:57:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D7721CE08; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:57:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27171-14; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:57:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2469721CD0C; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:57:41 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: "Andrew P." Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:57:33 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511040956.19087.kirk@strauser.com> <200511041129.17912.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1541058.fhacjdSd9T"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511060657.39674.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast diff command for large files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:57:43 -0000 --nextPart1541058.fhacjdSd9T Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 04 November 2005 02:04 pm, you wrote: > Does the overall order of lines change every time you dump the tables? No, although an arbitrary number of lines might get deleted. > If it does/can, then there's a trivial solution (a few lines in perl, or a > hundred lines in C) that'll make the speed roughly similar to that of I/O= =2E =20 Could you elaborate? That's been bugging me all weekend. I know I should= =20 know this, but I can't quite put my finger on it. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1541058.fhacjdSd9T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQBDbf3D5sRg+Y0CpvERApATAJY9NeDCOl/NlmXhFcmrjhLvYTG1AJ44pLy7 WOEwCwkb/5W4CegVFNq03g== =ZrKa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1541058.fhacjdSd9T-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 13:00:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C2916A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:00:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de (natnoddy.rzone.de [81.169.145.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B30F43D48 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from athena.laverenz.de (p5480E886.dip.t-dialin.net [84.128.232.134]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA6D0Px1026612 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:00:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481FAE38C789 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:00:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02343-05 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:00:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 657B4E286C50; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:00:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:00:24 +0100 From: Uwe Laverenz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051106130024.GC2307@laverenz.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436CAC53.9090600@ispro.net.tr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436CAC53.9090600@ispro.net.tr> Organization: private site Sender: uwe@laverenz.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at laverenz.de Subject: Re: Is there /etc/groups limits? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:00:28 -0000 On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 02:57:55PM +0200, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > For example, is there a limit which would stop apache to work because > the www user is member of 10000 groups? Apache wouldn't stop working, but there is a limit of 16 groups that a user can be member of. Uwe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 13:19:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62AB16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:19:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685C443D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:19:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-7-29.client.mchsi.com[12.216.7.29]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with SMTP id <20051106131953m9100du96ke>; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:19:54 +0000 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 07:19:53 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: Steve Bertrand In-Reply-To: <200511051530.jA5FU5qs000530@grond.sourballs.org> Message-ID: <20051106071527.B278@grond.sourballs.org> References: <200511051530.jA5FU5qs000530@grond.sourballs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: getting an old NIC to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:19:55 -0000 On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Steve Bertrand wrote: > It appears as though everything is in order. The routes are in place, > IP/SN is all correct etc. > > You are going to have to take a step down now to the lower layers of the > network stack. > > Perform this command while plugged into the network and let it run a > while: > > # tcpdump -n -i pcn0 > > What this will do is see if the nic can see traffic coming from other > machines. Throw some pings at it from another box, and even if the other > box doesn't get a reply, tcpdump will tell you if the nic can at least > see the incoming traffic. Also, run tcpdump on another box, and repeat > the process, but ping from the box with the 'bad' nic in it. Perhaps it > can send traffic, but just not receive. Doing this both ways will > indicate either way and may give you a clue. No indication of activity either way - 'tcpdump' on the affected machine sees no packets from elsewhere, 'tcpdump' on a working machine sees tons of packets, but none from this machine. > Further that, even farther down, try a different cable and switch port > (one at a time). I know that may seem silly, but weirder things have > happened. Yes, I know... tried swapping cables/hub ports, no change. > If all of that fails, due to the fact there is a driver loaded for the > device, and it is taking all of it's parameters ok, I would say slap a > new nic in the box and see if you can rx/tx traffic via it. If you can, > I'd say then there is a problem with the nic itself, and you have > confirmed it logically and completely. Well, that may take a few days, until I scrounge up an extra NIC... but thanks for the assistance. At least I know I was going about the testing the right way. -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 13:39:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A5C16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:39:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBCD43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:39:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so159851nzo for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 05:39:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BTlVFSC8aVWZLbfmmI1EnLp+Prp8IGZEQNI0q3yRmB8rakjOfOkmzH6GHhqnsRQ1TOk2tfOzlKIItB60PKYRDroNXfWc+qcWIxn+jDfoVhffzCux02fAfXrlsx53gxtwaK9LtXKc5iORA+DR3d1Rqqc/VtwqAO+6DEZaTWmV48E= Received: by 10.36.8.18 with SMTP id 18mr227956nzh; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 05:39:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 05:39:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:39:12 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Kirk Strauser In-Reply-To: <200511060657.39674.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200511040956.19087.kirk@strauser.com> <200511041129.17912.kirk@strauser.com> <200511060657.39674.kirk@strauser.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast diff command for large files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:39:13 -0000 On 11/6/05, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Friday 04 November 2005 02:04 pm, you wrote: > > > Does the overall order of lines change every time you dump the tables? > > No, although an arbitrary number of lines might get deleted. > > > If it does/can, then there's a trivial solution (a few lines in perl, o= r a > > hundred lines in C) that'll make the speed roughly similar to that of I= /O. > > Could you elaborate? That's been bugging me all weekend. I know I shoul= d > know this, but I can't quite put my finger on it. > -- > Kirk Strauser > > > while (there are more records) { a =3D read (line from old file) b =3D read (line from new file) if (a =3D=3D b) then next if (a <> b) { if (a in new_records) { get a out of new_records next } if (b in old_records) { get b out of old_records next } put a in old_records put b in new_records } after that old_records will contain records present in old file, but not in new file, and new_records will contain records present in new file, but not old one. Note, that the difference must be kept in RAM, so it won't work if there are multi-gig diffs, but it will work very fast if the diffs are only 10-100Mb, it will work at close to I/O speed if the diff is under 10Mb. If the records can be ordered in a known order (e.g. alphabetically), we don't need to keep anything in RAM then and make any checks at all. Let's assume an ascending order (1-2-5-7-31-...): while (there are more records) { a =3D read (line from old file) b =3D read (line from new file) while (a <> b) { if (a < b) then { write a to old_records read next a } if (a > b) then { write b to new_records read next b } } } If course, you've got to add some checks to deal with EOF correctly. Hope this gives you some idea. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:11:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511A116A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:11:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stepan_r@mail.ru) Received: from bsdserver.strakh.homeunix.net (190.212.221.83.donpac.ru [83.221.212.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF6243D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:11:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stepan_r@mail.ru) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([192.168.0.100]) by bsdserver.strakh.homeunix.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA6EBZGU079053; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:11:35 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from stepan_r@mail.ru) Message-ID: <436E0F21.9070402@mail.ru> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:11:45 +0300 From: Stepan Rakhimov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew P." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001601c5e179$eca0c9e0$6601a8c0@rick84b7807dcb> <436CFE25.4060005@ec.rr.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: GAMING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:11:40 -0000 > > Yesterday, I spent 4 hours playing UT2004. And it > seemed to run faster than on Windows. At least it > felt much cooler :-) Please give me a link to UT2004 howto. i tried to find it but without success. Stepan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:19:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497A816A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:19:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no) Received: from mail.adventuras.no (mail.adventuras.no [194.63.250.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A751143D53 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:19:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no) Received: from cm-80.111.248.098.chello.no (cm-80.111.248.098.chello.no [80.111.248.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.adventuras.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jA6EJJjt026776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:19:30 +0100 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:19:16 +0100 From: Lars Kristiansen To: Dikshie , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <030D9937BCDB326A68E329BB@cm-80.111.248.098.chello.no> In-Reply-To: <20051106044443.GA25274@ppk.itb.ac.id> References: <20051106044443.GA25274@ppk.itb.ac.id> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Adventuras-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Adventuras: du kan filtrere etter AdvSpamScore over 5-10 X-Adventuras-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.399, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no Cc: Subject: Re: sendmail-X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:19:51 -0000 --On Sunday, November 06, 2005 11:44:43 AM +0700 Dikshie wrote: > > dear all > has anyone porting sendmail-X ? > (http://www.sendmail.org/sm-X/index.html) > > > > > > > regards, > > -dikshie- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Med vennlig hilsen Lars Kristiansen A D V E N T U R A S Tlf: 22 20 59 90 Fax: 22 20 59 91 lars@adventuras.no http://www.adventuras.no From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:23:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29BC16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:23:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from fri.itea.ntnu.no (fri.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E991E43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:23:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844647F7B for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:23:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:23:26 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 44625 invoked by uid 1001); 6 Nov 2005 15:23:26 +0100 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 15:23:26 +0100 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:23:26 +0100 (CET) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@maren.thelosingend.net To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051106133412.A36825@maren.thelosingend.net> Message-ID: <20051106152232.S44500@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <48d803190511042350w3315444er34872cfcd1a6467e@mail.gmail.com> <20051105121723.152042d2@localhost> <48d803190511051652i36e5ab4dmedac4ba61f017c9@mail.gmail.com> <20051106133412.A36825@maren.thelosingend.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: Mohan Singh , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspend works, but resume doesn't on Dell desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:23:35 -0000 * Svein Halvor Halvorsen [2005-11-06 13:42 +0100] > When closing the lid on my laptop, while in X, and opening it again, the > ~50 topmost pixels are garbled and the entire view is shifted down. > Switching to console and back seem to fix it. Any takes? I fixed this by calling /etc/rc.lid trough devd and then calling vidcontrol in /etc/rc.lid. Svein Halvor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:23:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B972A16A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:23:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from merke.itea.ntnu.no (merke.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97A943D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:23:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merke.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8042013C40D for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:23:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by merke.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:23:26 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 44625 invoked by uid 1001); 6 Nov 2005 15:23:26 +0100 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 15:23:26 +0100 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:23:26 +0100 (CET) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@maren.thelosingend.net To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051106133412.A36825@maren.thelosingend.net> Message-ID: <20051106152232.S44500@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <48d803190511042350w3315444er34872cfcd1a6467e@mail.gmail.com> <20051105121723.152042d2@localhost> <48d803190511051652i36e5ab4dmedac4ba61f017c9@mail.gmail.com> <20051106133412.A36825@maren.thelosingend.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: Mohan Singh , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspend works, but resume doesn't on Dell desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:23:35 -0000 * Svein Halvor Halvorsen [2005-11-06 13:42 +0100] > When closing the lid on my laptop, while in X, and opening it again, the > ~50 topmost pixels are garbled and the entire view is shifted down. > Switching to console and back seem to fix it. Any takes? I fixed this by calling /etc/rc.lid trough devd and then calling vidcontrol in /etc/rc.lid. Svein Halvor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:23:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4337E16A421 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:23:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6F243D66 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:23:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 10181 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 14:23:45 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Nov 2005 14:23:45 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 0F98528441; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:23:42 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: David Fleck , FreeBSD questions References: <20051105091158.F447@grond.sourballs.org> <20051105172258.20108b64@localhost> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 06 Nov 2005 09:23:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051105172258.20108b64@localhost> Message-ID: <44fyq9g8ia.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 44 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: CD burning no longer working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:23:50 -0000 Fabian Keil writes: > David Fleck wrote: > > > System: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p11 > > > > dmesg: > > acd0: CD-RW drive at ata1 as master > > acd0: read 689KB/s (6032KB/s) write 344KB/s (8273KB/s), 2048KB > > buffer, PIO4 acd0: Reads: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA stream, packet > > acd0: Writes: CD-R, CD-RW, test write, burnproof > > acd0: Audio: play, 255 volume levels > > acd0: Mechanism: ejectable tray, unlocked > > acd0: Medium: no/blank disc > > > > The system has a CD-RW device which has, in the past, worked fine. > > Trying to burn an .iso right now, however, and getting the following > > behavior: > > > > # burncd -f /dev/acd0c data /misc/backup_assemble/backup051105.iso > > fixate next writeable LBA 0 > > writing from file /misc/backup_assemble/backup051105.iso size > > 408480 KB written this track 1472 KB (0%) total 1472 KB > > only wrote -1 of 32768 bytes err=5 > > > > fixating CD, please wait.. > > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error > > > > while the kernel complains: > > Nov 5 09:15:10 grond /kernel: acd0: WRITE_BIG - MEDIUM ERROR > > asc=0x02 ascq=0x00 error=0x00 Nov 5 09:15:10 grond /kernel: acd0: > > CLOSE_TRACK/SESSION - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x72 ascq=0x04 error=0x00 > > > > Same behavior with 2 different CDs. > > Used to work, now it doesn't, so I'm tempted to blame the hardware. > > But does anyone have any more specific ideas of what might be going > > on here? > > I never used burncd, but "/dev/acd0c" looks strange to me. It is correct for pre-5.x. The "MEDIUM ERROR" does, indeed, look like hardware problems would be the top candidate to explain the problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:24:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1674616A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:24:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF9743D64 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:24:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so162944nzo for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:24:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iDsMYqTZxK1Cl/ea8C+c8kk2X4ru2fVGsbauI3+rZRRECBge9J10j7PEbUOpQJhj3ADP9z8i3xbv7Hs6jcQ0ei+dmxwnkmLcwqDlIJxzaX9oArjEtVfHIH8yaAN3e1k43tB1tqKHZmZfZd1IGyp1nhHUQIG0lv5XHwpC8k5bOhw= Received: by 10.37.12.72 with SMTP id p72mr1027564nzi; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:24:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:24:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:24:45 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Stepan Rakhimov In-Reply-To: <436E0F21.9070402@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <001601c5e179$eca0c9e0$6601a8c0@rick84b7807dcb> <436CFE25.4060005@ec.rr.com> <436E0F21.9070402@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAMING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:24:52 -0000 T24gMTEvNi8wNSwgU3RlcGFuIFJha2hpbW92IDxzdGVwYW5fckBtYWlsLnJ1PiB3cm90ZToKPiA+ Cj4gPiBZZXN0ZXJkYXksIEkgc3BlbnQgNCBob3VycyBwbGF5aW5nIFVUMjAwNC4gQW5kIGl0Cj4g PiBzZWVtZWQgdG8gcnVuIGZhc3RlciB0aGFuIG9uIFdpbmRvd3MuIEF0IGxlYXN0IGl0Cj4gPiBm ZWx0IG11Y2ggY29vbGVyIDotKQo+Cj4gUGxlYXNlIGdpdmUgbWUgYSBsaW5rIHRvIFVUMjAwNCBo b3d0by4gaSB0cmllZCB0byBmaW5kIGl0IGJ1dCB3aXRob3V0Cj4gc3VjY2Vzcy4KPgo+IFN0ZXBh bgo+CgpodHRwOi8vd3d3LmZyZXNocG9ydHMub3JnL2dhbWVzL2xpbnV4LXV0MjAwNC1kZW1vLwoK 8SDOxSDQ0s/Cz9fBzCDQz8zO1cAg18XS08nALCDOzyDSwdog3NTBIMnEo9QsCsTVzcHALCDJINMg 0M/Mzs/KINDSz8LMxc0gzsUgwtXExdQuCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:27:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD1416A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:27:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76CA43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so163186nzo for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:27:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q0POXudICHsE5NeSIBFtA5i6Grt8PYHga+hl+henW0cFl3twdlEFwoNS8lZFFezlhtU9Z1Z6Cn9z9zI83dkrHrjBlThT9EQicS1fezU4gEs25CdlDzZ6udxqr8oglb9KTPCQRL/gcQYprobIsRm421L4Vqoj6DDDjqeOVuFdokw= Received: by 10.37.15.59 with SMTP id s59mr13371nzi; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:27:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:27:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:27:41 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051106130024.GC2307@laverenz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <436CAC53.9090600@ispro.net.tr> <20051106130024.GC2307@laverenz.de> Subject: Re: Is there /etc/groups limits? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:27:43 -0000 On 11/6/05, Uwe Laverenz wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 02:57:55PM +0200, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > > > For example, is there a limit which would stop apache to work because > > the www user is member of 10000 groups? > > Apache wouldn't stop working, but there is a limit of 16 groups that a > user can be member of. > > Uwe > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Yes, apache seems to look at a user's primary group only, which might be a bug. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:35:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E972E16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:35:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7D043D6A for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:35:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t13so211044wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:35:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=M0q9Lq5Dj1j0VuqY8TmcV/YQ5Totz3QpGhZvnvubziUjJP/LqtCNcpzxq9bFzu+qeo4F9rF1LzEGpoTrJgvGeNElUcX9kBjmqrcbGTC/+EIIfx+7d2NRPAMANdUoHYA/GsFEv7NopynV8pOUHPWdyLMiDECPG/ni8MOya10EPH4= Received: by 10.65.193.10 with SMTP id v10mr4274202qbp; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 06:35:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.61.15 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:35:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <59adc1a0511060635t33ee272h@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:35:21 +0200 From: Dimitar Vasilev To: "Andrew P." In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <001601c5e179$eca0c9e0$6601a8c0@rick84b7807dcb> <436CFE25.4060005@ec.rr.com> <436E0F21.9070402@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAMING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:35:29 -0000 MjAwNS8xMS82LCBBbmRyZXcgUC4gPGluZm9mYXJtZXJAZ21haWwuY29tPjoKPiBPbiAxMS82LzA1 LCBTdGVwYW4gUmFraGltb3YgPHN0ZXBhbl9yQG1haWwucnU+IHdyb3RlOgo+ID4gPgo+ID4gPiBZ ZXN0ZXJkYXksIEkgc3BlbnQgNCBob3VycyBwbGF5aW5nIFVUMjAwNC4gQW5kIGl0Cj4gPiA+IHNl ZW1lZCB0byBydW4gZmFzdGVyIHRoYW4gb24gV2luZG93cy4gQXQgbGVhc3QgaXQKPiA+ID4gZmVs dCBtdWNoIGNvb2xlciA6LSkKPiA+Cj4gPiBQbGVhc2UgZ2l2ZSBtZSBhIGxpbmsgdG8gVVQyMDA0 IGhvd3RvLiBpIHRyaWVkIHRvIGZpbmQgaXQgYnV0IHdpdGhvdXQKPiA+IHN1Y2Nlc3MuCj4gPgo+ ID4gU3RlcGFuCj4gPgo+Cj4gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5mcmVzaHBvcnRzLm9yZy9nYW1lcy9saW51eC11 dDIwMDQtZGVtby8KPgo+IM8g3dUg3+De0d7S0Nsg397b3ePuINLV4OHY7iwg3d4g4NDXIO3i0CDY 1PHiLAo+INTj3NDuLCDYIOEg397b3d7ZIN/g3tHb1dwg3dUg0ePU1eIuCsHf0OHY0d4g1ODj1+8h Ci0tCrTY3Nji6uAgstDh2NvV0gpEaW1pdGFyIFZhc3NpbGV2CgpHbnVQRyBrZXkgSUQ6IDB4NEI4 REI1MjUKS2V5c2VydmVyOiBwZ3AubWl0LmVkdQpLZXkgZmluZ2VycHJpbnQ6IEQ4OEEgM0I5MiBE RUQ1IDkxN0UgMzQxRSBENjJGIDhDNTEgNUZDNCA0QjhEIEI1MjUK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 14:52:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30B416A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:52:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from mail20.bluewin.ch (mail20.bluewin.ch [195.186.19.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681B443D5C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (83.77.149.200) by mail20.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.2.068.1) id 435E033A0005B960; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:52:04 +0000 Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA6F5h2h088021; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:05:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id jA6F5hnf088020; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:05:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:05:43 +0100 From: Martin Schweizer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051106150543.GO55827@saturn.pcs.ms> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UExESr5xZTMxdOWv" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland X-PGP-Key: http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc X-Fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239 Subject: SASL support in sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:52:10 -0000 --UExESr5xZTMxdOWv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello I would add sasl support to sendmail. I find in a lot of documentations the= hint=20 to add "APPENDDEF..." to my site.config.m4 file in devtools/Site. But I did= n't=20 find site.config.m4 file nor devtools/Site (I did a cvsup against the sourc= e).=20 I also find a hint in /usr/src/contrib/sendmail that the devtools was remov= ed=20 for sendmial compilation under FreeBSD. How do this wokrs? Any hints are we= lcome. --=20 Regards Martin=20 PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc;=20 fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; --UExESr5xZTMxdOWv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbhvHwa4WkdMP0jkRAjt2AJ9LLeuXUj6jBIkmGAQytCTZZzstIgCgl+b0 BjFbJJgzoOdK0wwkRk7YDJI= =rjNx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UExESr5xZTMxdOWv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 15:12:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E8516A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB16543D4C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:11:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t14so229080wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 07:11:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=U4kjzSqP66N5hGfpzuMT7fbsDsVFb7O/k9TnDXSufLTkJ6qVz+PZa4rSdP2nTwz2+k8wyqraf9es8mSSXAQ4VqgR3nZyZb9OxAmWSolm6z0NS4hy6xt2oMpLNLDalKB5dV2RBEMoWwZtPpswTbQuXK+fPpk3yjQtv2R+I1o3tZc= Received: by 10.70.44.6 with SMTP id r6mr3941343wxr; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 07:05:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.9.10 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 07:05:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <70e8236f0511060705h22f2d208w6768fbd0672dc60@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:05:02 +0000 From: Joao Barros To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0511050744w5820f255w66a44cce2c37a20e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <70e8236f0511050744w5820f255w66a44cce2c37a20e@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Odd boot problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:12:00 -0000 On 11/5/05, Joao Barros wrote: > Hi, > > I needed to add an IDE disk to an already running SCSI booting machine > for testing. > Recently upgraded to 6.0 :) with the IDE disk connected to the > machine, although not mounted. > After a make kernel the machine boots fine but only if I have the IDE > disk connected. > Booting from the scsi disk I can clearly see it's trying to find the > load from the ide disk. > I tried 'atacontrol detach ata0' and reinstalling the kernel and tried > a bsdlabel -B da0 but I still get the error, boot message follows: > > F1 FreeBSD > > Default: F1 > > Invalid partition > Invalid partition > No /boot/loader > > FreeBSD/i386 boot > Default: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/kernel/kernel > boot: > > > I tried 0:da(0,a)/boot/kernel/kernel but still no go. > How can I fix this? > > > -- > Joao Barros > One more odd thing I noticed: With ad0 attached like as before this problem occurred I correctly see this at the loader: F1 FreeBSD F5 Drive 1 Drive 1 is a raid array on another controller. With ad0 disconnected and da0 being the boot drive I only see: F1 FreeBSD Considering that doing a make work && kernel with a ad0(which I guess BIOS will see as the new drive 0) attached after the initial system installation on da0 rendered booting from da0 unusable, I think something very wrong must be happening. The disk to consider writing any new boot information should be the one where / lives in, not disk 0 reported by the BIOS. Well, that's my view of it anyway... I'm really unable to restore booting capabilities to da0 so any hints are highly appreciated. -- Joao Barros From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 15:13:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085B316A423 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:13:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gary@hayers.org) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD5F43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:13:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gary@hayers.org) Received: from thor.hayers.net ([82.34.131.150]) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:13:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.8.2] (bart.hayers.net [192.168.8.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by thor.hayers.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA6FCtfe068466; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:12:56 GMT (envelope-from gary@hayers.org) Message-ID: <436E1D83.1050004@hayers.org> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:13:07 +0000 From: Gary Hayers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Schweizer References: <20051106150543.GO55827@saturn.pcs.ms> In-Reply-To: <20051106150543.GO55827@saturn.pcs.ms> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter with Sophos (http://www.amavis.org) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2005 15:13:51.0124 (UTC) FILETIME=[B1ACCD40:01C5E2E4] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SASL support in sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:13:01 -0000 Martin Schweizer wrote: > Hello > > I would add sasl support to sendmail. I find in a lot of documentations the hint > to add "APPENDDEF..." to my site.config.m4 file in devtools/Site. But I didn't > find site.config.m4 file nor devtools/Site (I did a cvsup against the source). > I also find a hint in /usr/src/contrib/sendmail that the devtools was removed > for sendmial compilation under FreeBSD. How do this wokrs? Any hints are welcome. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 15:25:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1677A16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:25:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7194D43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:25:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 84582 invoked by uid 1002); 6 Nov 2005 15:25:52 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 2.84288 secs); 06 Nov 2005 15:25:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 15:25:48 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'David Fleck'" Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:25:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20051106071527.B278@grond.sourballs.org> Thread-Index: AcXi1NQjldaTTnQ+TkKe/XTbU1bhDAAEUJHQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113129074967584567@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051106152553.7194D43D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: getting an old NIC to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:25:54 -0000 > Well, that may take a few days, until I scrounge up an extra > NIC... but thanks for the assistance. At least I know I was > going about the testing the right way. Good stuff. However, there is one more test you can do (if possible). If the 'bad' NIC can be removed from the affected box, if it's not imbedded in the MB, then you can try putting it in another box, just to eliminate the very, very slight possibility this is a computer issue, and not a NIC issue. Just a thought. I wish you lived next door, I've got about 30 NIC's laying around...I work at an ISP ;) Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 15:28:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5B316A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:28:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0200D43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:28:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 85148 invoked by uid 1002); 6 Nov 2005 15:28:49 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 2.535597 secs); 06 Nov 2005 15:28:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 15:28:46 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'budsz'" Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:28:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <4d4dc3640511060408p2079e13bo12502d2f62680b17@mail.gmail.com> Thread-Index: AcXi0PO5LplfoxVYTvu5SrAnP60jZQAFXg9w X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113129092667585142@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051106152849.0200D43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: Realtek ethernet problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:28:50 -0000 > I've some problem (can't ping etc) with rl (Realtek Ethernet > Manufacture), if I installing that ethernet on the one CPU > rl0 & rl, either that ethernet can't be use. Whereas rl0 & > rl1 has been active if I use `ifconfig` command. If I droping > one of them from my CPU, ethernet can use again. Would you > give information with this situation I'm in a hurry, but a quick suggestion. This problem *may* crop up if you incidentally try to apply an IP to a NIC that is currently in use on the network. With both NIC's installed and activated, please reply the list with the output of the following commands: # ifconfig -a # uname -a # netstat -rn ...then, do the same with only one NIC installed at a time. Comparing the differences may be able to give us more clues to the problem here. Regards, Steve > > TIA > > -- > budsz > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 15:33:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3000716A41F; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:33:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (ntweb04.msdihosting.net [66.199.153.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F0F43D48; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:33:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([24.201.183.241]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id B3Q02104; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:33:46 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051106102933.0252b2f8@pop.msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:33:23 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ian Lord Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ale@FreeBSD.org Subject: Ports: php5-mysqli 5.0.5_1 Dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:33:28 -0000 Hi, I just installed port php5-mysqli. One of the packages it installs at the same time is mysql_client which is for mysql 4.1 If I try to manually install package for mysql50_client I get a conflict saying I cannot install because files go at the same place. How can I bypass this kind of situation ? Is the only way is waiting for an update to package php5_mysqli or can I force the install without creating problems ? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 15:34:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA5416A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:34:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laslo_holifeld@yahoo.com) Received: from web35807.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web35807.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A92E43D5A for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:34:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laslo_holifeld@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 70410 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Nov 2005 15:34:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ysmTInS7B2T4jS6n32jfrTfT8sGBs29WfK1dAvLNeWH9FYTk0J5q3QVjfuwV2AQrQ1Fsash7L1rB47KaPUcYBwh2pAqZdLnJBWpJxGI6oS9xpSdfD/d822El3TvTudNijAfZTGr5ry+iI4dMPe791rkvg74UL3dO7cgYUGRd/ac= ; Message-ID: <20051106153420.70408.qmail@web35807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [149.156.74.183] by web35807.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 07:34:20 PST Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 07:34:20 -0800 (PST) From: Laslo Holifeld To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44r79w2yve.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: custom kernel problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:34:22 -0000 Hi Thanx for reply LG, but ive managed to solve it (tonight..). The problem was caused by the options: options AUTO_EOI_1 options AUTO_EOI_2 ive #-ed em out and it worked;-) Now, i'm curious why did it happend... __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 16:27:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB7816A42F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:27:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailinglist-morlipf@arcor.de) Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0353B43D4C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:27:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailinglist-morlipf@arcor.de) Received: from mail-in-08-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.20]) by mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727C7B99F3 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:27:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mail-in-08-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50069A952 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:27:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.24] (dslb-084-060-141-237.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.141.237]) (Authenticated sender: mailinglist-morlipf@arcor.de) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4B4A7308 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:27:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <436E2F07.5010909@arcor.de> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:27:51 +0100 From: Moritz Lipfert User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20051106) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: USB mice don't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:27:53 -0000 Hi, on every start of FreeBSD 6.0-stable amd64 the kernel reports "device problem (set_addr_failed)..." and my USB mice don't work. I've tested a Logitech MX518 and a Microsoft IntelliMouse Explorer 3.0. The LEDs of the optical sensors are not working. The USB-daemon is started and I already tried to configure the mice with sysinstall. Nothing helped. How can I solve this problem? Any ideas? System specs: AMD Athlon64 3500+ 2x 512MB Corsair Memory MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (nVidia nForce3) ATi Radeon X800XT-PE In Linux both mice work flawlessly! Best regards, MorLipf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 16:30:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC16716A41F; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu (server.t-hosting.hu [217.20.133.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5641743D49; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5243997D98; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:30:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from server.t-hosting.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.t-hosting.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 91455-07-2; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:30:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.98.133.57] (catv-50628539.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.133.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.t-hosting.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351D8997688; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:30:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:30:00 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Cc: Subject: What happened with portaudit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:30:08 -0000 Hello, One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4, ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody suspect what's wrong? Cheers, Gabor Kovesdan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 16:39:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531A916A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:39:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asolomon15@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20D643D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:39:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asolomon15@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so227691wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:39:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=rgbte0YKtNU7vWRJF1CV9/EdVgVeW6dQwC+fZ7Z8TrkJ7q2IeEl+EHipsa4Hp/DuANVig09X3eYzP3XZruRZaE3VgsSU7MYo01JztdiHucoVR7MnlIEB4btQNoSBWQPwpg8Z3/Qz2FNpH5QB+XjH4TMaaGz2GUxzzy7OBsU2XNc= Received: by 10.70.122.10 with SMTP id u10mr4068423wxc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 08:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.89.5 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 08:39:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:39:53 +0000 From: Antoine Solomon To: "Andrew P." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <001601c5e179$eca0c9e0$6601a8c0@rick84b7807dcb> <436CFE25.4060005@ec.rr.com> <436E0F21.9070402@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: GAMING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:39:54 -0000 SGV5IGlzIHRoZXJlIGFueSBwb3J0IG9mIHRoZSBmdWxsIGdhbWU/CgpPbiAxMS82LzA1LCBBbmRy ZXcgUC4gPGluZm9mYXJtZXJAZ21haWwuY29tPiB3cm90ZToKPgo+IE9uIDExLzYvMDUsIFN0ZXBh biBSYWtoaW1vdiA8c3RlcGFuX3JAbWFpbC5ydT4gd3JvdGU6Cj4gPiA+Cj4gPiA+IFllc3RlcmRh eSwgSSBzcGVudCA0IGhvdXJzIHBsYXlpbmcgVVQyMDA0LiBBbmQgaXQKPiA+ID4gc2VlbWVkIHRv IHJ1biBmYXN0ZXIgdGhhbiBvbiBXaW5kb3dzLiBBdCBsZWFzdCBpdAo+ID4gPiBmZWx0IG11Y2gg Y29vbGVyIDotKQo+ID4KPiA+IFBsZWFzZSBnaXZlIG1lIGEgbGluayB0byBVVDIwMDQgaG93dG8u IGkgdHJpZWQgdG8gZmluZCBpdCBidXQgd2l0aG91dAo+ID4gc3VjY2Vzcy4KPiA+Cj4gPiBTdGVw YW4KPiA+Cj4KPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmZyZXNocG9ydHMub3JnL2dhbWVzL2xpbnV4LXV0MjAwNC1k ZW1vLwo+Cj4g8SDOxSDQ0s/Cz9fBzCDQz8zO1cAg18XS08nALCDOzyDSwdog3NTBIMnEo9QsCj4g xNXNwcAsIMkg0yDQz8zOz8og0NLPwszFzSDOxSDC1cTF1C4KPgo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJz ZC5vcmcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Cj4gaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlz dGluZm8vZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMKPiBUbyB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgc2VuZCBhbnkgbWFpbCB0 byAiCj4gZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMtdW5zdWJzY3JpYmVAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmciCj4KPgoKCi0t CkFudG9pbmUgVy4gU29sb21vbiBKci4K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 17:10:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB4B16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from mail22.bluewin.ch (mail22.bluewin.ch [195.186.19.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5386A43D49 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:10:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (83.77.149.200) by mail22.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.2.068.1) id 435E04C60031A2F2; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:10:06 +0000 Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA6HNlXd088420; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:23:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id jA6HNk9V088419; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:23:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:23:45 +0100 From: Martin Schweizer To: Gary Hayers Message-ID: <20051106172345.GP55827@saturn.pcs.ms> Mail-Followup-To: Gary Hayers , Martin Schweizer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051106150543.GO55827@saturn.pcs.ms> <436E1D83.1050004@hayers.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8WA4ILJSyYAmUzbY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436E1D83.1050004@hayers.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland X-PGP-Key: http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc X-Fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Martin Schweizer Subject: Re: SASL support in sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:10:22 -0000 --8WA4ILJSyYAmUzbY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Gary Sorry I checked a lot of ressources but not the hanbook... argh! Thank you = for=20 the hint. Am Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 03:13:07PM +0000 Gary Hayers schrieb: > Martin Schweizer wrote: > >Hello > > > >I would add sasl support to sendmail. I find in a lot of documentations= =20 > >the hint to add "APPENDDEF..." to my site.config.m4 file in devtools/Sit= e.=20 > >But I didn't find site.config.m4 file nor devtools/Site (I did a cvsup= =20 > >against the source). I also find a hint in /usr/src/contrib/sendmail tha= t=20 > >the devtools was removed for sendmial compilation under FreeBSD. How do= =20 > >this wokrs? Any hints are welcome. >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html --=20 Regards Martin=20 PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc;=20 fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; --8WA4ILJSyYAmUzbY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbjwhwa4WkdMP0jkRAsgKAJ99zc4F3ATa3l3IxvPJgaCYR/6QDQCeK6fg MY6mQ/pMEnepEYdrWStCjZo= =Plym -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8WA4ILJSyYAmUzbY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 17:19:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C656F16A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:19:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99C143D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:19:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so231895wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:19:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-mobile:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=emgc65Sa4dAYkh9YEFu2PJ2aldLKZduAHygQbvFkZEJ26Ke+x21Hh3NBM+GBL4XSxdLZY30RmeGBJTtcmyxq+TGjbLVT0Lv3hpef/qlIeqsBaLOuV6qMxVf1NigT1NJNAcxFPpTL2jyKm1oxDhY09y1B9ykJBYP+96TEn4hZJK4= Received: by 10.70.53.3 with SMTP id b3mr3743611wxa; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ( [203.145.188.150]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h34sm1571447wxd.2005.11.06.09.19.32; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:19:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <436E3B04.8030409@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:49:00 +0530 From: Subhro Organization: IBM Advanced Career Education User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Windows/20051006) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= References: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> X-Mobile: +919831064613 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened with portaudit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:19:47 -0000 Kövesdán Gábor sat at his 'puter and typed on 11/6/2005 22:00: > Hello, > > One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4, > ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's > security run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or > removed the affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its > database, but now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command > lists that three packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody > suspect what's wrong? > > Cheers, > > Gabor Kovesdan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > The first thing I would do is check the tripwire checksums. Thanks S. -- ---------------+---------------------------------------------- | Subhro Sankha Kar \ / | GSM: +919831064613 -- Fax: +919831832913 \./ | MSN:subhro@subhro.org -- Yahoo: subhro82 (0Y0) | ICQ: 203567534 -- AIM: bsdboy1982 ooO--(_)--Ooo--+---------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 17:44:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CBA16A42D for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:44:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@bramp.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net (pih-relay06.plus.net [212.159.14.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394D443D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:44:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@bramp.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [80.229.232.206] (helo=Andrew) by pih-relay06.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1EYoZ5-0005cN-Hj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:44:23 +0000 Message-ID: <197001c5e2f9$b9b024f0$0a00a8c0@Andrew> From: "Andrew Brampton" To: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:44:23 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Subject: LDM (Windows Dynamic Disks) in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:44:25 -0000 Hi, I think I've found the answer to my question already, but I wanted to be 100% sure. Can I read Window Dynamic Disk volumes from within FreeBSD? More precisely RAID-5 volume across multiple disks. I've googled and googled and I think the answer is no. The linux-ntfs project has a tool that can display information about the volume but the file system driver isn't fully developed yet. If there is no LDM support in FreeBSD, I think I'm going to port the userland linux-ntfs ldminfo tool to FreeBSD, however I have a quick question about GPL. If I port the code then obviously my version will have to be under the GPL. I was wondering how this impacts the BSD licence? I presume users of FreeBSD can happily use this tool, and hopefully one day it would be allowed in ports. But say I extended this tool into a file system driver (which I know is a big leap) would this code ever be considered for the Kernel, or would I have to code from scratch to avoid the GPL restrictions? Thanks in advance Andrew Brampton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 17:45:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2F516A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:45:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74C443D53 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:45:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EYoYM-0007vO-EW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:43:38 +0100 Received: from r5k101.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.10.101]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:43:38 +0100 Received: from martinkov by r5k101.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:43:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:43:01 +0100 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5k101.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050925 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> Sender: news Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened with portaudit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:45:15 -0000 Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > Hello, > > One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4, > ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security > run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the > affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but > now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three > packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody suspect what's wrong? > > Cheers, > > Gabor Kovesdan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > well, i can confirm i've had some issues with ports lately, too. after realising new gnome was out i did portsnap and portaudit as usual. i was very surprised to find out that portversion didn't show new ports as well as portaudit didn't report on 2 vulnerabilities it reported a day or two before. i tried to update ports db manually only to find some errors. pkg_version correctly identified new ports. this state changed in about half a day when suddenly portsnap & portversion reported all new packages. otoh, portaudit still doesn't report on vulnerabilities it reported a few days ago. strange.. martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 17:45:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B335716A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:45:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E29B43D6D for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:45:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m22so173920nzf for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:45:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QG0BSepxDh6FV1yc5sgimTbC0YHU50N8TV+0dUkqiIZCFYGfZ+shWQgPkdg7o7dkoZ+4AmA/0Vi2kY8Mv2lIZjwojMarq4MTvIEAraFiGKo9FOWVbzr79H0s9DT8hIQrffJCNsPfQsX+iPaUloo8t6KPrBuoXQ8zmlxDqQu3Nb8= Received: by 10.37.15.59 with SMTP id s59mr46686nzi; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 09:45:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 09:45:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:45:46 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Antoine Solomon In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <001601c5e179$eca0c9e0$6601a8c0@rick84b7807dcb> <436CFE25.4060005@ec.rr.com> <436E0F21.9070402@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAMING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:45:58 -0000 On 11/6/05, Antoine Solomon wrote: > Hey is there any port of the full game? > Not in the ports tree and not that I know of. I'm sure it's not a problem to run it. Copy protection will be an obstacle, but if you own the game you'll be fully justified in searching for a crack and cracking it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 18:12:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA3816A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:12:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from allendtate@yahoo.com) Received: from web80902.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web80902.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.95.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2BB943D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:12:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from allendtate@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 14046 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Nov 2005 18:12:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=vnDUdKFu34M7Kf8RGPO9jIQ5SGEtD0wMAp1uw8VNbb4p1elGc6bCFBRIiyjXk3jX5kpoObjkSQaDZGtYOoxfnNInGFnEksDqHY7fmHCiG3l2L09fR8jIgKN6/bCm22dh7GT8qffxAUyqdpqOcIyY3deYLyCsIbahRyUkJ96iyN0= ; Message-ID: <20051106181233.14044.qmail@web80902.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.179.157.159] by web80902.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:12:33 PST Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:12:33 -0800 (PST) From: "Allen D. Tate" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051106120047.EE5CF16A422@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: New Logo - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ (OFF-TOPIC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:12:34 -0000 > Very disappointing. I prefer the current logo over a ball with two > horns!!! and the font used to write FreeBSD is very unprofessional. It is interesting to see differing opinions. I kinda like the new logo and new font and think that it does look professional. I am not saying that your opinion is wrong in any way so don't think I am saying you're wrong. :) __________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 18:28:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7088616A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:28:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from polinsky@nyct.net) Received: from bsd4.nyct.net (mail-out.nyct.net [216.139.141.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFB243D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:28:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from polinsky@nyct.net) Received: from debian31.polinsky.home (adsl-216-139-154-77.nyct.net [216.139.154.77]) by bsd4.nyct.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA6ISSfa043180 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:28:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from polinsky@nyct.net) From: Alan Polinsky To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:28:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1131301703.6043.14.camel@debian31.polinsky.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Problems with upgrading 5.4 stable to 6.0 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:28:30 -0000 I have been having repeated difficulties in upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0. My problems start in the make buildworld step. The last successful compile step is: /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf created for ./usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf >From that point I get a series of cascading errors. I tried ignoring them, but could not successfully build the kernel. I have looked through documentation at your site, but could not find a resolulution. This is my only exposure to freebsd. I have several linux boxes at home that I use with no problems. At work I am a unix (Solaris 8) and application programmer under windows. These are the cascading errors: ===> sbin/ipf/ipf(obj) mkdir; /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf: file exists *** Error code 1 stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf. *** Error code 1 stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf *** Error code 1 stop in /usr/src/sbin *** Error code 1 stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 stop in /usr/src I purchased my orginal Freebsd 5.3 disks from freebsdmall. I then successfully upgraded to 5.4 with no problems. I have been choosing cvsup4 as my source of the upgrades. Perhaps you can help. Thank you very much Alan Polinsky From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 18:34:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D42A16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:34:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9921A43D48 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:34:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA6IYK2M088154 ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:34:20 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 166 Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (galois1.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.116]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA6IYJFo015172 ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:34:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by galois1.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA6IYIge012485 ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:34:18 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by galois1.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id jA6IYI9Z012484; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:34:18 +0100 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:34:18 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Alan Polinsky Message-ID: <20051106183418.GA11855@math.jussieu.fr> References: <1131301703.6043.14.camel@debian31.polinsky.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1131301703.6043.14.camel@debian31.polinsky.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:34:20 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 436E4CAC.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with upgrading 5.4 stable to 6.0 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:34:22 -0000 Le 06/11/2005 à 13:28:23-0500, Alan Polinsky a écrit > I have been having repeated difficulties in upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0. > My problems start in the make buildworld step. The last successful > compile step is: > /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf created for ./usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf > > >From that point I get a series of cascading errors. I tried ignoring > them, but could not successfully build the kernel. I have looked through > documentation at your site, but could not find a resolulution. > > This is my only exposure to freebsd. I have several linux boxes at home > that I use with no problems. At work I am a unix (Solaris 8) and > application programmer under windows. > > These are the cascading errors: > > ===> sbin/ipf/ipf(obj) mkdir; /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf: file exists > *** Error code 1 > stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf. > *** Error code 1 > stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf > *** Error code 1 > stop in /usr/src/sbin > *** Error code 1 > stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > stop in /usr/src Very easy to solve cd /usr rm -rf obj That's work for me. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Sun Nov 6 19:33:24 CET 2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 18:47:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D699816A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:47:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A7643D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:47:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [24.53.250.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84AC69A4D for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:47:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:47:53 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051106134753.1cacb64c.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Installing mod_frontpage to apache2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:47:56 -0000 A google search doesn't reveal any recent posts about this. Ports updated just an hour or so ago. Freshports seems to indicate that all should be well, yet I get this: cd /usr/ports/www/mod_frontpage && make install ***************************************************** IMPORTANT This port still has some security issues. Some buffer overflows have been fixed, but since the port depends on ENV[] variables, a local user can still gain a UID of another user. This is a design issue, and also present in the apache13-fp port. Check carefully that the Makefile has FP_UID_MIN and FP_GID_MIN set correctly. If you think security is very important for you, you shouldnt run frontpage at all. ***************************************************** => mod_frontpage_mirfak-1.6.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mirfak/. mod_frontpage_mirfak-1.6.2.tar.gz 100% of 29 kB 57 kBps ===> Extracting for mod_frontpage-1.6.2_1 => Checksum OK for mod_frontpage_mirfak-1.6.2.tar.gz. ===> Patching for mod_frontpage-1.6.2_1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for mod_frontpage-1.6.2_1 ===> mod_frontpage-1.6.2_1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/apxs - found ===> Configuring for mod_frontpage-1.6.2_1 Using: /usr/local/sbin/httpd Let's see if it's a valid httpd... YES! sbindir is /usr/local/sbin, trying to find apxs...Found! Config directory: /usr/local/etc/apache2 Compiler: cc CFLAGS: -O -pipe Include directory: /usr/local/include/apache2 Libexecdir: /usr/local/libexec/apache2 /httpd.conf: not found Reading httpd.conf... Apache user: , group: Userdir: ServerRoot: ErrorLog: ErrorLog was relative, expanded to / DocumentRoot_unresolved: () DocumentRoot: () Content uid 80, gid 80 Creating Makefile ===> Building for mod_frontpage-1.6.2_1 "Makefile", line 15: Need an operator "Makefile", line 85: Need an operator make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_frontpage. It looks like the port finds the correct directory, but then can't find the httpd.conf file there? ls /usr/local/etc/apache2 Includes httpd.conf magic ssl.conf ssl.key envvars.d httpd.conf.good mime.types ssl.crt uname -a FreeBSD ferrando.3dresearch.com 4.11-STABLE FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #1: Thu Jun 30 13:56:39 EDT 2005 root@ferrando.3dresearch.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/FERRANDO20050630 i386 pkg_info | grep apache apache-2.0.55 Version 2 of Apache web server with prefork MPM. Thoughts anyone? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:01:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC0316A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:01:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from omersen@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DEA43D4C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:01:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from omersen@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t16so264014wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:01:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=LvTL4XNOW8FLUB/BGrVUrF+68NYlo8EzcGlQjvnLEzTUYpnoJegziVZvssvcYSECF47chXgXAy4NdVcmRMC1AfcFA50IAc9gyi4/7kt4XQQ+OHtRQdbgDSfLKvw1ID9fF6hBHlfpEAdk/yp9LHl5ASIdGsDBnYnwHLo96ilwaPQ= Received: by 10.64.208.19 with SMTP id f19mr4520304qbg; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:01:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.253.12 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:01:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:01:57 +0200 From: Omer Faruk Sen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: why mozilla but not firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:01:59 -0000 Hi, I am sure this question was asked before but why gnome2 metaport installs mozilla but not firefox? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:10:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F77016A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:10:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9A143D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so347193wra for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:10:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=eSJNrMEEDqKgvgaLRXRP+PRBSakJcBbEARGpsO+IwUVXha3phA5r4S1bFoAx27jb45ibGb4eMrewoKOumLZAjiOFzEKCiZKl5S9wjDyD+P7sMqQ06WyAcnermVRjClQRraNNZ4dreoGEyqykb4RjrXlBpz34snX0CeveWX7isMg= Received: by 10.54.108.4 with SMTP id g4mr3199101wrc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 67sm1529173wra.2005.11.06.11.10.04; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:10:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Omer Faruk Sen Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:01:26 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511061101.27352.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: why mozilla but not firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:10:06 -0000 On Sunday 06 November 2005 11:01, Omer Faruk Sen wrote: > Hi, > > I am sure this question was asked before but why gnome2 metaport installs > mozilla but not firefox? put WITH_MOZILLA=firefox in /etc/make.conf then you'll get firefox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:10:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621D116A42C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:10:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B120843D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:10:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA87840; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:10:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:10:04 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Albert Shih In-Reply-To: <20051106183418.GA11855@math.jussieu.fr> Message-ID: <20051106140715.Q64998@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <1131301703.6043.14.camel@debian31.polinsky.home> <20051106183418.GA11855@math.jussieu.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-74905668-1131304204=:64998" Cc: Alan Polinsky , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with upgrading 5.4 stable to 6.0 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:10:25 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-74905668-1131304204=:64998 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Albert Shih wrote: > Le 06/11/2005 =E0 13:28:23-0500, Alan Polinsky a =E9crit >> I have been having repeated difficulties in upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0. >> My problems start in the make buildworld step. The last successful >> compile step is: >> /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf created for ./usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf >> >>> From that point I get a series of cascading errors. I tried ignoring >> them, but could not successfully build the kernel. I have looked through >> documentation at your site, but could not find a resolulution. >> >> This is my only exposure to freebsd. I have several linux boxes at home >> that I use with no problems. At work I am a unix (Solaris 8) and >> application programmer under windows. >> >> These are the cascading errors: >> >> =3D=3D=3D> sbin/ipf/ipf(obj) mkdir; /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf: file = exists >> *** Error code 1 >> stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf. >> *** Error code 1 >> stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf >> *** Error code 1 >> stop in /usr/src/sbin >> ** Error code 1 >> stop in /usr/src. >> *** Error code 1 >> stop in /usr/src > > Very easy to solve > > =09cd /usr > =09rm -rf obj Sounds close, but you don't want/need to remove the /usr/obj=20 directory, just everything in it: # cd /usr/obj # chflags -R noschg * # rm -rf * -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] --0-74905668-1131304204=:64998-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:15:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5575316A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:15:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9767B43D5C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:15:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56415610B; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:15:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25013-04; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:15:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1390C6118; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:15:10 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <436E563E.6040209@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:15:10 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050930) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Hill References: <1131301703.6043.14.camel@debian31.polinsky.home> <20051106183418.GA11855@math.jussieu.fr> <20051106140715.Q64998@tripel.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20051106140715.Q64998@tripel.monochrome.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC46C985ECCECD494F4909584" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) at makeworld.com - FreeBSD:The Power To Serve Cc: Alan Polinsky , questions@freebsd.org, Albert Shih Subject: Re: Problems with upgrading 5.4 stable to 6.0 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: RacerX@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:15:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC46C985ECCECD494F4909584 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Hill wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Albert Shih wrote: >=20 >> Le 06/11/2005 =E0 13:28:23-0500, Alan Polinsky a =E9crit >> >>> I have been having repeated difficulties in upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0= =2E >>> My problems start in the make buildworld step. The last successful >>> compile step is: >>> /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf created for ./usr/src/sbin/ipf/libip= f >>> >>>> From that point I get a series of cascading errors. I tried ignoring= >>> >>> them, but could not successfully build the kernel. I have looked thro= ugh >>> documentation at your site, but could not find a resolulution. >>> >>> This is my only exposure to freebsd. I have several linux boxes at ho= me >>> that I use with no problems. At work I am a unix (Solaris 8) and >>> application programmer under windows. >>> >>> These are the cascading errors: >>> >>> =3D=3D=3D> sbin/ipf/ipf(obj) mkdir; /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf: fi= le exists >>> *** Error code 1 >>> stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf >>> *** Error code 1 >>> stop in /usr/src/sbin >>> ** Error code 1 >>> stop in /usr/src. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> stop in /usr/src >> >> >> Very easy to solve >> >> cd /usr >> rm -rf obj >=20 >=20 > Sounds close, but you don't want/need to remove the /usr/obj directory,= > just everything in it: >=20 > # cd /usr/obj > # chflags -R noschg * > # rm -rf * >=20 AND - the sad thing is, the above is verbatim from the FreeBSD site. Users - PLEASE READ at least 2 times before doing.... You were given a brain, use it! --=20 Best regards, Chris The quickest way to experiment with acupuncture is to try on a new shirt. --------------enigC46C985ECCECD494F4909584 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDblZED5P/gMAbw2MRAqf/AJ9Zt/cFIcDsOq5J/SvDkt8b59ziUwCfSgBG 3xMAeH2COaM8OhOSSeDZqq8= =azyq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC46C985ECCECD494F4909584-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:23:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D00316A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from seba.perso@sebsd.net) Received: from smtp.hispeed.ch (mxout.hispeed.ch [62.2.95.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6A443D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:23:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from seba.perso@sebsd.net) Received: from dell.sinux.seb (217-162-204-218.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.204.218]) by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/taifun-1.0) with ESMTP id jA6JNgv9001772; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:23:42 +0100 From: Sebastien To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051106120047.5EE4B16A422@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20051106120047.5EE4B16A422@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:23:36 +0000 Message-Id: <1131308616.746.21.camel@dell.sinux.seb> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on smtp-02.tornado.cablecom.ch X-Virus-Status: Clean X-DCC-spamcheck-02.tornado.cablecom.ch-Metrics: smtp-02.tornado.cablecom.ch 32701; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Cc: crs.freebsd_mailinglist@users.nuaptools.com Subject: Re: 5.4 Generic Kernel - da and scbus...I'm at a loss X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:23:46 -0000 > I am a newbie to kernel related things. I'm running 5.4 using the generic > kernel. I am problems with using an iPod via USB, and it seems that I may > not have device support for sa and scbus in my kernel. I have been > searching for a few hours this evening using various criteria and am still > unable to get past this issue. > > It seems like the failure is that a device node /dev/da* for the umass drive > isn't be created. Any help would be appreciated. I am going to try booting > the 6.0 kernel off CD next and then go from there. I had the same problem with a "nano". I had many difficulties to find a way to solve it too. Finally this link helped me http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2005-September/001534.html I patched /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb_subr.c as described, compiled my kernel again and it works... I'm not sure that it's the right way but it works... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:39:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2165216A43C for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:39:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xmisoy@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4380A43D53 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:39:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xmisoy@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so246958wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:38:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=arHgENRdGW9oeUlRQnyAGeLkYPdUsMp9/LmFohWFVxaHNx8b+8CXs5W7fbt5MX+Gg1UGrnYeoijMJlPhZGc1VNY7lbVSwYSen1+t0YESKYyOCbNhVPw5iEtWxklwDIcoujuEqcEn19AaaiLSfwvW3+Q9G59GgxVV5DgYRdnlZUw= Received: by 10.70.110.9 with SMTP id i9mr4198265wxc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:38:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.54.6 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:38:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:38:59 -0800 From: "Edwin D. Vinas" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:39:01 -0000 Hi, I need your help please. On my personal FreeBSD server connected to an ISP with static IP address, I'm planning to setup several websites with their own sub-domains from my main domain as shown below. I just want to know some answers to my question= s before I start. Main domain: www.exampledomain.ph Sub-domains: sub1.exampledomain.ph sub2.exampledomain.ph sub3.exampledomain.ph I want to use BIND together with my Apache virtual hosting in one single FreeBSD machine. These are my questions: 1) Is it correct that I only need to register or pay for the main domain? 2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (sub= 1 to sub3) without anymore registering those sub domains and pay for them in my main domain provider? 3) Provided that I already have successfully setup my local DNS server, Apache virtual hosting and main domain activated, is it straightforward tha= t I can already access the sub domains (i.e., websites) from the Internet? 4) Do I need to register sub1, sub2 and sub3 in any external domain provider? 5) Can you provide some sample configs if you are already doing this setup? Thank you in advance! - Misoy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:46:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C57216A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: from qmail0.ifxnetworks.com (qmail0.ifxnetworks.com [200.110.128.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF3243D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:46:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (qmail 22252 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 19:46:37 -0000 X-Spam-DCC: CollegeOfNewCaledonia: qmail0.ifxnetworks.com 1189; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on qmail0.ifxnetworks.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.5 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO hopto.org) ([200.73.29.52]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail0.ifxnetworks.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 6 Nov 2005 19:46:26 -0000 Received: from hopto.org (oa3s2wa35212b3bi@localhost.daemon.cl [127.0.0.1]) by hopto.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA6Jl5wG023377; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:47:06 -0300 (CLST) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) Received: (from dmw@localhost) by hopto.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jA6Jkw4k023364; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:46:58 -0300 (CLST) (envelope-from dmw@unete.cl) X-Authentication-Warning: dmw.hopto.org: dmw set sender to dmw@unete.cl using -f Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:46:58 -0300 From: Daniel Molina Wegener To: Moritz Lipfert Message-ID: <20051106194658.GA22038@dmw.hopto.org> References: <436E2F07.5010909@arcor.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436E2F07.5010909@arcor.de> Organization: DMW Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB mice don't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Molina Wegener List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:46:40 -0000 On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:27:51PM +0100, Moritz Lipfert wrote: > Hi, > > on every start of FreeBSD 6.0-stable amd64 the kernel reports > "device problem (set_addr_failed)..." and my USB mice > don't work. I've tested a Logitech MX518 and a Microsoft > IntelliMouse Explorer 3.0. The LEDs of the optical sensors are > not working. The USB-daemon is started and I already tried to > configure the mice with sysinstall. Nothing helped. > > How can I solve this problem? Any ideas? If you use moused, try de "auto" in the mouse type parameter. From the moused(8) manual page: --- BEGIN QUOTE -- For the USB mouse, the protocol must be auto. No other protocol will work with the USB mouse. --- END QUOTE --- Also, use the same moused in the X Windows System. > System specs: > AMD Athlon64 3500+ > 2x 512MB Corsair Memory > MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (nVidia nForce3) > ATi Radeon X800XT-PE > > In Linux both mice work flawlessly! > > Best regards, > MorLipf > [SNIP] Regards -- . 0 . | Daniel Molina Wegener . . 0 | dmw at unete dot cl 0 0 0 | FreeBSD Power User From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:49:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D93C16A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62B743D49 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x3so199174nzd for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:49:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IyJ5D9ji0mo8KMxrm+QFhgYtsF+J6f3+ufI6/Bt2B+hZKvA8FBZ/5qPjTWanVWuGK6ixTJ9wHfV3HhOBMtD/gvXbaT82orFzVHNiPBB20A8pQftfVourGd0gbZwmQ22nkckzey+yIry3WUYmYxjuJbofaGOwd2/VRx+rNtzV87E= Received: by 10.36.141.13 with SMTP id o13mr946667nzd; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:49:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 11:49:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:49:39 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: "Edwin D. Vinas" In-Reply-To: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:49:40 -0000 On 11/6/05, Edwin D. Vinas wrote: > Hi, > I need your help please. > On my personal FreeBSD server connected to an ISP with static IP address, > I'm planning to setup several websites with their own sub-domains from my > main domain as shown below. I just want to know some answers to my questi= ons > before I start. > Main domain: www.exampledomain.ph > Sub-domains: > sub1.exampledomain.ph > sub2.exampledomain.ph > sub3.exampledomain.ph > I want to use BIND together with my Apache virtual hosting in one single > FreeBSD machine. > These are my questions: > 1) Is it correct that I only need to register or pay for the main domain? Yep. > 2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (s= ub1 > to sub3) without anymore registering those sub domains and pay for them i= n > my main domain provider? It's kinda the same as the first one. Yep. > 3) Provided that I already have successfully setup my local DNS server, > Apache virtual hosting and main domain activated, is it straightforward t= hat > I can already access the sub domains (i.e., websites) from the Internet? It's pretty straightforward, but not implicit. You need to explicitly setup a wildcard subdomain. > 4) Do I need to register sub1, sub2 and sub3 in any external domain > provider? Not if you want to. > 5) Can you provide some sample configs if you are already doing this setu= p? Here's a dump from my xname.org account: csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09SOA=09ns0.xname.org. infofarmer.mail.ru. 200507= 2201 261000 261000 604800 300 csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09NS=09ns0.xname.org. csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09NS=09ns1.xname.org. csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09A=09193.233.5.13 csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09MX=0910 csme.ru. *.csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09CNAME=09csme.ru. cs.csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09CNAME=09csme.ru. css.csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09CNAME=09csme.ru. mx.csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09CNAME=09csme.ru. old.csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09CNAME=09killme.ru. sat.csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09CNAME=09infofarmer.dyndns.org. source.csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09CNAME=09csme.ru. www.csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09CNAME=09csme.ru. zone.csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09NS=09infofarmer.dyndns.org. csme.ru.=09=09260000=09IN=09SOA=09ns0.xname.org. infofarmer.mail.ru. 200507= 2201 261000 261000 604800 300 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:50:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9482E16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:50:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [212.104.129.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDC443D48 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:50:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3240E2E2978; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:50:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01929-03-3; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:50:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kryten.xk7.net (unknown [81.168.90.101]) by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2432E295E; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:50:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: by kryten.xk7.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D6BE91703E; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:48:27 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:48:27 +0000 From: Paul Waring To: "Edwin D. Vinas" Message-ID: <20051106194827.GA755@kryten.xk7.net> References: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:50:49 -0000 On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:38:59AM -0800, Edwin D. Vinas wrote: > 1) Is it correct that I only need to register or pay for the main domain? Yes, provided you choose a registrar who will allow you to change the namservers on the daomin - i.e. they don't force you to use their nameservers in conjunction with a web hosting package or something (123-reg.co.uk will definitely work as I use them for a similar setup to the one you describe). > 2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (sub1 > to sub3) without anymore registering those sub domains and pay for them in > my main domain provider? That's correct. Adding a subdomain is generally a case of adding one line to the zone file for that particular domain (assuming you're just adding a simple subdomain that isn't going to be delegated or receive mail or anything comlicated like that) and telling Bind to reload the zone file (/etc/rc.d/named reload will usually work, although I find I often have to use restart instead of reload for some reason). > 3) Provided that I already have successfully setup my local DNS server, > Apache virtual hosting and main domain activated, is it straightforward that > I can already access the sub domains (i.e., websites) from the Internet? Assuming you're not behind a firewall of any type (or you setup the relevant rules), then it should be fairly simple to make everything accessible from the rest of the Internet. If your main domain works, then any subdomains on the same machine should do as well. > 4) Do I need to register sub1, sub2 and sub3 in any external domain > provider? No, you'd just tell your registrar to change the nameservers to whatever your local DNS servers are. Most will have a control panel allowing you to do this easily. > 5) Can you provide some sample configs if you are already doing this setup? > Thank you in advance! What kind of sample config? If you're not doing anything special, any tutorial on DNS/Bind will show you how to setup subdomains. Paul -- Rogue Tory http://www.roguetory.org.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 19:59:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E6A16A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:59:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E33943D6D for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:59:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from arwen.nagual.st (arwen.nagual.st [192.168.11.29]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:59:41 +0100 id 00000034.436E60AD.0000078B Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:00:01 +0100 From: dick hoogendijk To: fbsdq Message-Id: <20051106210001.6ad2fe63.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20051106180630.GB4574@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051106122317.46c1d99d.dick@nagual.st> <20051106180630.GB4574@xor.obsecurity.org> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.5 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: linux-glib2 unavailable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:59:46 -0000 On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:06:30 -0500 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:23:17PM +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > fetch: > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/glib2-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm: > > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > > RESTRICTED= "binary under GNU LGPL without accompanying source" Will this be solved in the near future? What's to be expected? Is this some kind of error of the guys from the rpm file? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:01:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC88C16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:01:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE1043D82 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:01:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0EF611E; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:01:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26040-03; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:01:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27BD6118; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:01:02 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <436E60FC.5050009@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:01:00 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050930) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Edwin D. Vinas" References: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF2EE73B22B6963E2B23E5C19" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) at makeworld.com - FreeBSD:The Power To Serve Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: RacerX@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:01:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF2EE73B22B6963E2B23E5C19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Edwin D. Vinas wrote: > Hi, > I need your help please. > On my personal FreeBSD server connected to an ISP with static IP address, > I'm planning to setup several websites with their own sub-domains from my > main domain as shown below. I just want to know some answers to my questions > before I start. > Main domain: www.exampledomain.ph > Sub-domains: > sub1.exampledomain.ph > sub2.exampledomain.ph > sub3.exampledomain.ph > I want to use BIND together with my Apache virtual hosting in one single > FreeBSD machine. > These are my questions: > 1) Is it correct that I only need to register or pay for the main domain? > 2) Is it correct that through my local DNS server, I can add sub hosts (sub1 > to sub3) without anymore registering those sub domains and pay for them in > my main domain provider? > 3) Provided that I already have successfully setup my local DNS server, > Apache virtual hosting and main domain activated, is it straightforward that > I can already access the sub domains (i.e., websites) from the Internet? > 4) Do I need to register sub1, sub2 and sub3 in any external domain > provider? > 5) Can you provide some sample configs if you are already doing this setup? > Thank you in advance! > - Misoy Your fisrt and hardest roadblock will be getting your provider to allow YOU to be authoritive for the IP or IP's you use. Many will not allow that - meaning, you will get reolution one way, but not reverse - meaning again, 123.123.123.123 = yourname.com = 123.123.123.123 Once you get past that - the rest is easy.. Im willing to bet tho - your provider will not allow you or will have to do that for you. -- Best regards, Chris Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. --------------enigF2EE73B22B6963E2B23E5C19 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbmEED5P/gMAbw2MRApt0AJ9DjoIklVHfbVZJvYL1QEyPZUEkbgCgsXfj 6TR4zlASyzjbVJ5q0N+i7Ek= =BGcD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF2EE73B22B6963E2B23E5C19-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:03:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211A916A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:03:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael@endace.com) Received: from www.endace.com (endace.smrn.com [209.234.97.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C5143D6A for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:03:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael@endace.com) Received: from et.endace.com (203-97-51-114.dsl.clear.net.nz [203.97.51.114]) by www.endace.com (8.13.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jA6K3nLf073976 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.64.174] (nemausa.et.endace.com [192.168.64.174]) by et.endace.com (8.13.4/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA6K3gmU090654 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:03:43 +1300 (NZDT) Message-ID: <436E61B0.1090407@endace.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:04:00 +1300 From: Michael Honeyfield User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040621, clamav-milter version 0.72a on www.endace.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: New Zealand FTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:03:51 -0000 Hello. I have noticed that the New Zealand FTP site is not functional. I can not see any form of connect on the mirrors page for the mirror, so I am hoping you might be able to contact them or remove the dud link. Thanks Michael. [michael@nemausa ~]$ traceroute nz.freebsd.org traceroute to nz.freebsd.org (202.8.44.45), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 gateway (192.168.64.253) 0.899 ms 1.578 ms 0.369 ms 2 m1122 (192.168.8.254) 1.193 ms 1.012 ms 1.473 ms 3 clear-akl1-bsn1.auckland.clear.net.nz (203.167.218.65) 10.743 ms 10.224 ms 9.718 ms 4 cs1-e4-7-acld.auckland.clix.net.nz (203.97.9.85) 9.866 ms 10.367 ms 10.083 ms 5 g1-0-927.u11.tspn.telstraclear.net (218.101.61.6) 11.511 ms 33.576 ms 17.727 ms 6 g1-926.u12.brh.telstraclear.net (218.101.61.35) 23.960 ms 24.080 ms 26.210 ms 7 lnk1-ihug-ge-1-0-1642.u12.telstraclear.net (203.98.18.162) 22.615 ms 22.408 ms 23.576 ms 8 cl-nihat.ape.net.nz (192.203.154.4) 24.263 ms 25.047 ms 24.097 ms 9 rufer.citylink.co.nz (202.8.44.97) 36.945 ms 33.907 ms 37.174 ms 10 * * * 11 * [michael@nemausa ~]$ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:09:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1103316A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3874343D5A for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:09:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from arwen.nagual.st (arwen.nagual.st [192.168.11.29]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:09:28 +0100 id 00000034.436E62F8.000007F1 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:09:48 +0100 From: dick hoogendijk To: fbsdq Message-Id: <20051106210948.7f575985.dick@nagual.st> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.5 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: lib not found error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:09:30 -0000 Strange error. Only seen it on 6.0 release. I'm building a new 6.0 machine from scratch. Installed courier-authlib and courier packages from ports (as I have on my 4.11 and 5.4 computers. All went well. Except a strange error when I run makealiases: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 can't find a courier library Location: (/usr/local/lib/courier-authlib/libcourierauth.so.0 The file is there, but can't be found. Strange. No errors on 5.4 / 4.11 (??) As a temp solution I symlinked the libcourierauth.so.0 to /lib (ok ok, it's not the right way, I know..) and the error goes away. What is wrong here? Why is /usr/local/lib/courier-authlib not put in the ldconfig searchpath? How can I solve it in a /neat/ way? -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:28:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AC016A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:28:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E5D43D49 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:28:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from [10.10.10.210] (ppp211-161.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.122.211.161]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jA6KSc7X077639 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 06:58:39 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Message-ID: <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:58:38 +1030 From: Matthew Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:28:41 -0000 >>My problem is that when I select the installation source, Ethernet is >>not amongst the options (just SLIP, PPP and something else weird). > > That "something weird" could well be the ethernet card. unlike Linux, > the ethernet devices are not all named "ethX', but are named after the > driver. So it could be e.g. sk0, xl0, dc0, de0, fxp0, vr0 etc. > >>I assume that there's a kernel module not loaded, so after looking >>further through the documentation, I found that I should be able to put >>a line in /boot/defaults/loader.conf. Since the installation so far was >>actually bootable (that's one up on Linux!), I did this. All this did >>for me was to generate a warning that the module was already loaded. > > Then try to use the "something weird" as the ethernet device. Thanks for that Roland - I've had another look, but the "something weird" is PLIP, which I believe to be some parallel port communication system. So, my real question remains: how does one get a network card recognised? One piece of documentation refers to kernel configuration as part of the installation process - I don't know if that's for an older version, because this step certainly doesn't show up on mine. Cheers M -- Matthew Smith Kadina Business Consultancy, South Australia Work: Personal: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:48:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3A716A420; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmy@inet-solutions.be) Received: from hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA2B43D5F; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:48:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmy@inet-solutions.be) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CDE238180; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:48:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from intranet.devbox.be (d54C304FE.access.telenet.be [84.195.4.254]) by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392D4383A2; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:48:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from intranet.devbox.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by intranet.devbox.be (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA6KmqTO030478; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:48:52 +0100 (CET) Received: (from jimmy@localhost) by intranet.devbox.be (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA6KmqtV004518; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:48:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:48:52 +0100 From: Jimmy Scott To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= Message-ID: <20051106204852.GB25399@ada.devbox.be> References: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-KeyID: 48033D3D X-PGP-Fingerprint: 88A9 54A0 D143 A4F7 8ACA 154F 8032 D30C 4803 3D3D X-PGP-Key: http://pub.devbox.be/misc/pgp.jimmy.asc Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened with portaudit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:48:57 -0000 --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:30:00PM +0100, K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: > Hello, >=20 > One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4,=20 > ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security= =20 > run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the=20 > affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but=20 > now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three= =20 > packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody suspect what's wrong? >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Gabor Kovesdan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" >=20 I noticed the same, but didn't had the time to look for a possible answer on that question. --=20 The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Death, Famine, War, and SNMP --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD) iD8DBQFDbmw0gDLTDEgDPT0RAoiqAJ0YtkSn+9Oc8rT7QjXIbE9N2nOpLwCgkh7z xS8kFLa+elRpUhkH4f6D/A4= =cTn9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:49:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C7C16A420 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:49:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [212.104.129.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B6D43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491B32E296D; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:49:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14270-01-33; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:49:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kryten.xk7.net (unknown [81.168.90.101]) by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DB92E295E; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:49:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: by kryten.xk7.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 67E3A1703E; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:47:32 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:47:32 +0000 From: Paul Waring To: Chris Message-ID: <20051106204732.GB755@kryten.xk7.net> References: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> <436E60FC.5050009@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436E60FC.5050009@makeworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Edwin D. Vinas" Subject: Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:49:53 -0000 On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:01:00PM -0600, Chris wrote: > Your fisrt and hardest roadblock will be getting your provider to allow > YOU to be authoritive for the IP or IP's you use. That's not necessary - I host the DNS, web sites and mail for a dozen different domains off an IP address for which I don't control the DNS (in fact it doesn't even have a DNS record). Reverse DNS control is always useful, but not a requirement for what he wants to do. Paul -- Rogue Tory http://www.roguetory.org.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:53:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2128716A423 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:53:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEFF43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:53:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so356153wra for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:53:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:to:subject:date:from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:user-agent; b=ANVhV8KbNsr8ocutVXYrfW4JlqmtNNcJHW+7rf5/eQ5Ryr7/Rc6T9VZa7qyT8UIeLnQ2NFK6OgKbvkLmWBhvjXVneobY/YS61zmobT6B8UdQPIfU2WLA7dXstu4myn24cUrhHAHpf8vR+Dmn0x1gSpW+SCst84CD2G6e20VMrNI= Received: by 10.54.79.3 with SMTP id c3mr3249556wrb; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:53:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ross.inet ( [205.250.255.161]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 6sm476524wrl.2005.11.06.12.53.11; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:53:12 -0800 (PST) To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:53:08 -0800 From: ross Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera M2/8.50 (FreeBSD, build 1358) Subject: Changing location of ports tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:53:48 -0000 My /usr partition is to small for some of the larger programs (openoffice.org, jdk, etc) and I want to move my ports tree to a harddrive with more space. can I just change the line in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf that says "ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/usr/ports'" to "ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/mybigfatharddrive/ports'"? Will all the pkg tools such as portsnap, portupgrade, and portversion continue to function properly? will I have to edit any other config files before this will work seemlessly? -- What time is it? Dodgeball Time! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 20:54:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC5016A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailinglist-morlipf@arcor.de) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE4243D6B for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailinglist-morlipf@arcor.de) Received: from mail-in-01-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-01-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.13]) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFF2A6E9B for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:54:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mail-in-01-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBB87BC21 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:54:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.2.24] (dslb-084-060-141-237.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.141.237]) (Authenticated sender: mailinglist-morlipf@arcor.de) by mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A04B97C2 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:54:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <436E6D79.4040909@arcor.de> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:54:17 +0100 From: Moritz Lipfert User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20051106) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436E2F07.5010909@arcor.de> <20051106194658.GA22038@dmw.hopto.org> In-Reply-To: <20051106194658.GA22038@dmw.hopto.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: USB mice don't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:54:19 -0000 Daniel Molina Wegener wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:27:51PM +0100, > Moritz Lipfert wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> on every start of FreeBSD 6.0-stable amd64 the kernel reports >> "device problem (set_addr_failed)..." and my USB mice >> don't work. I've tested a Logitech MX518 and a Microsoft >> IntelliMouse Explorer 3.0. The LEDs of the optical sensors are >> not working. The USB-daemon is started and I already tried to >> configure the mice with sysinstall. Nothing helped. >> >> How can I solve this problem? Any ideas? >> > > If you use moused, try de "auto" in the mouse type parameter. > From the moused(8) manual page: > --- BEGIN QUOTE -- > For the USB mouse, the protocol must be auto. No other protocol > will work with the USB mouse. > --- END QUOTE --- > > Also, use the same moused in the X Windows System. > > >> System specs: >> AMD Athlon64 3500+ >> 2x 512MB Corsair Memory >> MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum (nVidia nForce3) >> ATi Radeon X800XT-PE >> >> In Linux both mice work flawlessly! >> >> Best regards, >> MorLipf >> [SNIP] >> > > Regards > At the moment there are no moused lines in my rc.conf. Should I add these configuration lines? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 21:01:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A453316A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:01:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muon61@charter.net) Received: from mtai01.charter.net (mtai01.charter.net [209.225.8.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1598D43D68 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:01:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muon61@charter.net) Received: from mxip32-10.charter.net ([10.20.203.72]) by mtai01.charter.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.03 201-2131-123-103-20050825) with ESMTP id <20051106210147.LBFJ23275.mtai01.charter.net@mxip32-10.charter.net> for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:01:47 -0500 Received: from 68-187-157-154.dhcp.stcl.mn.charter.com (HELO [IPv6:::1]) ([68.187.157.154]) by mxip32-10.charter.net with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2005 16:01:47 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= Message-ID: <436E6F3A.7020504@charter.net> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:01:46 -0600 From: Aubrey{Al} Dunn User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: id=218202B8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Freebsd install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:01:48 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am currently trying to install freebsd 6.0 and the problem is that freebsd will not see my windows or netbsd side at all. All it See's is the whole disk and nothing else. I would like to install freebsd on the netbsd side but I do want to lost my windows installation. Please help me solve this problem so I can install freebsd again Cordially, AL Dunn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDbm86W1i/SyGCArgRAjHrAJ99AaRCEqnEGZe1q94L+VvzZak65gCdGTUH B6ISRyH5bcfpjJnbpDC9Bhw= =auyD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 21:13:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66DF16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmoffatt@ilanw.com) Received: from smtp.ilanw.com (server001.ilanw.com [67.42.142.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B7F43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:13:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cmoffatt@ilanw.com) Received: from CMMLAPTOP ([69.252.221.191] RDNS failed) by smtp.ilanw.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:10:44 -0700 From: "Moffatt, Chris" To: Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:13:27 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcXjFA/2Akl1/ZPjQCiIm1eHpRWvLAAApdoQ X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2005 21:10:44.0953 (UTC) FILETIME=[8D4FCC90:01C5E316] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RE: Changing location of ports tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:13:45 -0000 The easiest way to change it would be to move the ports folder from /usr to where ever you are moving it... Then create a symbolic link... ln -s /somewhere/ports /usr/ports Then everything should work as is... _____ From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of ross Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 1:53 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Changing location of ports tree My /usr partition is to small for some of the larger programs (openoffice.org, jdk, etc) and I want to move my ports tree to a harddrive with more space. can I just change the line in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf that says "ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/usr/ports'" to "ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/mybigfatharddrive/ports'"? Will all the pkg tools such as portsnap, portupgrade, and portversion continue to function properly? will I have to edit any other config files before this will work seemlessly? -- What time is it? Dodgeball Time! _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 21:16:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0312416A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:16:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AAF43D64 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:16:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.253.228] ([82.41.253.228]) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:16:54 +0000 Message-ID: <436E7292.7090104@dial.pipex.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:16:02 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ross References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Nov 2005 21:16:54.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[69CAF9B0:01C5E317] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing location of ports tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:16:05 -0000 ross wrote: > My /usr partition is to small for some of the larger programs > (openoffice.org, jdk, etc) and I want to move my ports tree to a > harddrive with more space. can I just change the line in > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf that says "ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= > '/usr/ports'" to "ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/mybigfatharddrive/ports'"? > > Will all the pkg tools such as portsnap, portupgrade, and portversion > continue to function properly? will I have to edit any other config > files before this will work seemlessly? Move the tree then make a symlink from /usr/ports to your new dir. That's guaranteed to work. You could also try just moving the distfiles subdir and symlinking it, since that really takes the space (apart from building). Without knowing how little space you have, it's hard to know if that will be good enough. Just changing the ENV in pkgtools.conf will only work for tools which use it, which I don't think includes portsnap. You'd want to set it in your root shell for everything to see it. Or, for the larger ports just make with WRKDIRPREFIX set to somewhere with lots of space. You can set that is pkgtools.conf per port, assuming you use portupgrade or in make.conf, for every port to use it. I don't like that as for some ports I sometimes need to keep the work subdir hanging around. See man ports! --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 21:18:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A2A16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:18:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from charlie_mc_us@yahoo.com) Received: from web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E4C443D5F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:17:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from charlie_mc_us@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 78897 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Nov 2005 21:17:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eUcL8YXbXUm1xhfsqWIRXvoesHkCs15zJsgt0BP/ECbAuWoKBc85fRw0Ch3Sy/4vdBO2W0Ptjzmne0kOVCvMy55uO+zqhpOCO1jERziPVE3/eM4Sw8t8NFtdERm3sP5zEvHEgIsoDrldfqvIk/6GO/EUeQGefszW5VoqiSwio+o= ; Message-ID: <20051106211756.78895.qmail@web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.215.23.54] by web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:17:56 PST Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:17:56 -0800 (PST) From: Charlie McElfresh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: can't install php5-dba port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:18:00 -0000 Hello, I'm running php 5.05, apache 2.053, on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE. When I try to install the port (from the ports collection) php5-dba I get this message: ===> php5-dba-5.0.3_2 is marked as broken: Doesn't work with PHP version : 4 (Doesn't support PHP 4). Help appreciated. Charlie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 21:20:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C93416A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:20:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD54943D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:20:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 25299 invoked by uid 502); 6 Nov 2005 21:20:31 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 21:20:31 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:20:30 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:20:33 -0000 My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was upgrading Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It looks like sometime around 11:30pm the computer reset. This morning I'm trying to reinstall all the software that got lost in last night's reset and I get another reset in the middle of compiling. The last message in /var/log/messages before reboot is: Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing it's a hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? Thanks, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 21:29:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F8F16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:29:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (cs.earlham.edu [159.28.230.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905A643D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (stu160022.student.earlham.edu [159.28.160.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA6LT173043092 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:29:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Message-ID: <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:28:57 -0500 From: Skylar Thompson Organization: Earlham College Computer Science Department User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Micah References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA8FB1AC0008880BA4FB05DBD" X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (quark.cs.earlham.edu [159.28.230.3]); Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:29:06 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1165/Sun Nov 6 00:12:58 2005 on quark.cs.earlham.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 159.28.230.3 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on quark.cs.earlham.edu Cc: freeBSD Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: skylar@cs.earlham.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:29:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA8FB1AC0008880BA4FB05DBD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Micah wrote: > > My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was upgrading > Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It looks like > sometime around 11:30pm the computer reset. This morning I'm trying > to reinstall all the software that got lost in last night's reset and > I get another reset in the middle of compiling. The last message in > /var/log/messages before reboot is: > Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 > Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 > Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel > > I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing it's > a hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? Could it be a bad power supply? Try swapping in another one and see what happens. -- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ --------------enigA8FB1AC0008880BA4FB05DBD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDbnWbsc4yyULgN4YRAt2RAJ0Y4rJPi1ailIh5VHqH63Vd5TBq7wCfVvZJ RuKCnXS8l/v9JIEFXTOc0gY= =Pchi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA8FB1AC0008880BA4FB05DBD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 21:40:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD5316A425 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:40:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp2.linkline.com (smtp2.linkline.com [64.30.215.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DE043D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:40:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp2.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92ED112 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:40:10 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:40:12 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: More help with find Thread-Index: AcXjGqqN6OvTME8NEdqYJgAKlXMBfA== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: More help with find X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:40:15 -0000 Hi-- I=B9m on Darwin and am having the following problem. When I do a find / it is finding not only all the files I have on my startup volume, but since under Darwin, any ext. drives, cd=B9s etc. are listed in the Volumes directory, which exists on the startup volume, it continues on and finds all files on all the volumes, not just the startup volume I want. What I really need is an expression which will ls all files found which hav= e a mod. date/time of more than a certain number of days from today, but that are *not* in the Volumes directory, i.e., only those results which exist on the startup volume. Is there a way to do this? Thanks :) All My Best, Jeffrey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 22:01:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B2F16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:01:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6541443D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:01:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 27554 invoked by uid 502); 6 Nov 2005 22:01:51 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 22:01:51 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:01:50 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: skylar@cs.earlham.edu References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> In-Reply-To: <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freeBSD Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:01:52 -0000 Skylar Thompson wrote: > Micah wrote: > >> >> My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was upgrading >> Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It looks like >> sometime around 11:30pm the computer reset. This morning I'm trying >> to reinstall all the software that got lost in last night's reset and >> I get another reset in the middle of compiling. The last message in >> /var/log/messages before reboot is: >> Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 >> Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 >> Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel >> >> I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing it's >> a hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? > > > > Could it be a bad power supply? Try swapping in another one and see what > happens. > I was thinking that too, unfortunately I don't have a spare and was hoping to diagnose before buying parts. Voltages look fine when I check the accessory lines (+5 and +12) with a multimeter under load. Thanks, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 22:09:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE24916A41F; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:09:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571D943D46; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:09:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id 01D65114AF; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:09:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:09:42 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Jimmy Scott Message-ID: <20051106220942.GC904@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> <20051106204852.GB25399@ada.devbox.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051106204852.GB25399@ada.devbox.be> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened with portaudit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:09:44 -0000 --ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005.11.06 21:48:52 +0100, Jimmy Scott wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:30:00PM +0100, K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4,=20 > > ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's securit= y=20 > > run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the= =20 > > affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but= =20 > > now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that thre= e=20 > > packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody suspect what's wron= g? >=20 > I noticed the same, but didn't had the time to look for a possible > answer on that question. It does seem to work for me now. Could people having this problem please check the size of /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz and try to run portaudit -Fa to refetch the database and check again? For reference: [simon@zaphod:/tmp] ls -l /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31762 6 Nov 22:40 /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.t= bz There have been one previous report where a problem with the portaudit database build resulted in an incomplete auditfile which was then fixed after the next portaudit database rebuild. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Security Team --ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbn8mh9pcDSc1mlERAl5IAKCQ77kHqIeqJYnB1Uyr4KwvX5VtGgCffJ18 R9GPir8f9fy6YT5QitjgLcU= =oN+t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ctP54qlpMx3WjD+/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 22:15:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C7116A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:15:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A690543D49 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ross.penner@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so213504wra for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:15:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:to:cc:subject:references:message-id:from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=sh+ibOijPsUtAQkqUQUZva8dLZomGk3b9PA/jHi6Ewzo90QANGqKiqNebb43BrPHe9Za9yM4KCT3kMCmBzW/6gQBnuq0DQWn97DYxEmluc7odVEyowHPIwr/dcMWJyXn0OkTOKyqEiczpz+kt7bgrWzPRosVCwQs1fbLkcdqdh8= Received: by 10.54.126.10 with SMTP id y10mr686024wrc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:15:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ross.inet ( [205.250.255.161]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 39sm5851072wrl.2005.11.06.14.15.49; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:15:49 -0800 (PST) To: "Alex Zbyslaw" References: <436E7292.7090104@dial.pipex.com> Message-ID: From: ross Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:15:43 -0800 In-Reply-To: <436E7292.7090104@dial.pipex.com> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.50 (FreeBSD, build 1358) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Changing location of ports tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:15:51 -0000 On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:16:02 -0800, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > ross wrote: > >> My /usr partition is to small for some of the larger programs >> (openoffice.org, jdk, etc) and I want to move my ports tree to a >> harddrive with more space. can I just change the line in >> /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf that says "ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= >> '/usr/ports'" to "ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/mybigfatharddrive/ports'"? >> >> Will all the pkg tools such as portsnap, portupgrade, and portversion >> continue to function properly? will I have to edit any other config >> files before this will work seemlessly? > > Move the tree then make a symlink from /usr/ports to your new dir. > That's guaranteed to work. You could also try just moving the distfiles > subdir and symlinking it, since that really takes the space (apart from > building). Without knowing how little space you have, it's hard to know > if that will be good enough. > > Just changing the ENV in pkgtools.conf will only work for tools which > use it, which I don't think includes portsnap. You'd want to set it in > your root shell for everything to see it. > > Or, for the larger ports just make with WRKDIRPREFIX set to somewhere > with lots of space. You can set that is pkgtools.conf per port, > assuming you use portupgrade or in make.conf, for every port to use it. > I don't like that as for some ports I sometimes need to keep the work > subdir hanging around. > > See man ports! > > --Alex > that symbolic link trick works wonders. Thanks for that tip as well as the others -- What time is it? Dodgeball Time! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 22:41:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0471B16A421 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:41:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE95B43D53 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:41:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B5D6118; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:41:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29137-05; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:41:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B9D610B; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:41:08 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <436E8682.5030306@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:41:06 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050930) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Waring References: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> <436E60FC.5050009@makeworld.com> <20051106204732.GB755@kryten.xk7.net> In-Reply-To: <20051106204732.GB755@kryten.xk7.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=C01BC363 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDC30BA9D8057F0A834460A13" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) at makeworld.com - FreeBSD:The Power To Serve Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Edwin D. Vinas" Subject: Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: RacerX@makeworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:41:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDC30BA9D8057F0A834460A13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul Waring wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:01:00PM -0600, Chris wrote: > >>Your fisrt and hardest roadblock will be getting your provider to allow >>YOU to be authoritive for the IP or IP's you use. > > > That's not necessary - I host the DNS, web sites and mail for a dozen > different domains off an IP address for which I don't control the DNS > (in fact it doesn't even have a DNS record). Reverse DNS control is > always useful, but not a requirement for what he wants to do. > > Paul > It may not be necessary - but to do it right... I for one like to have mu IP's resolve both forward and reverse. It's just professional looking as a whole. But - to each thier own I suppose. -- Best regards, Chris If you don't say it, they can't repeat it. --------------enigDC30BA9D8057F0A834460A13 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDboaKD5P/gMAbw2MRAujoAJ9ZNuW5gSHlKvAWrsVkT+MjDLd1ngCfb4Fc wM3BSWUWXTPL1IEwN0OYJfk= =JkiC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDC30BA9D8057F0A834460A13-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 22:45:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEA816A448 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:45:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979DE43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:45:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so267039wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:45:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NjZC7LVb/w2vwaiGe018IZsC/g7xz3PKT87fDqujpzS7l/OpL8tXrQ854rH4ydsR3lic43gMuzu/3Ei7dYGstEYzcgnVcKpSHv0mtBlpslHnsC8vwFSeGhJkyRrEEVsuWYuyeZ3KQ8uDRXvjr3T6JEE6u4d64LsynVVZNcrX6JA= Received: by 10.70.78.8 with SMTP id a8mr748330wxb; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:45:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.91.17 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:45:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57416b300511061445m43404596r2d48a5e931e9dbf5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:45:24 +1100 From: Peter Clutton To: Evren Yurtesen In-Reply-To: <436CAC53.9090600@ispro.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <436CAC53.9090600@ispro.net.tr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there /etc/groups limits? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:45:26 -0000 On 11/5/05, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a limit on how many groups a user can belong to? I believe you can enter in the groups file as many as you want, but only 16 will be used, so the limit is 16. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 22:48:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAB516A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:48:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [212.104.129.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB26943D6A for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205152E297A; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:48:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20225-03-5; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:48:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kryten.xk7.net (unknown [81.168.90.101]) by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2F82E2973; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:48:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: by kryten.xk7.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 32BF11703E; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:45:50 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:45:50 +0000 From: Paul Waring To: Chris Message-ID: <20051106224550.GA3718@kryten.xk7.net> References: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> <436E60FC.5050009@makeworld.com> <20051106204732.GB755@kryten.xk7.net> <436E8682.5030306@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436E8682.5030306@makeworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Edwin D. Vinas" Subject: Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:48:18 -0000 On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:41:06PM -0600, Chris wrote: > It may not be necessary - but to do it right... I for one like to have > mu IP's resolve both forward and reverse. It's just professional looking > as a whole. I like to have my IPs resolve both ways too, but try finding an ISP who will either give you that sort of control through delegation or is willing to setup the required reverse DNS records on their side. If you're lucky you'll get customer114324.myisp.net to play with. I don't know of any residential ISPs, at least not in the UK, who will do that sort of thing. Having said that, there's nothing particularly "wrong" about not having reverse DNS records for IPs, or having ones that don't match. It only really matters if you're sending out email to people with overly aggressive spam filters that check for that sort of thing. Paul -- Rogue Tory http://www.roguetory.org.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 23:19:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B3F16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:19:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2392B43D46 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:19:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA6NJ33k007190; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:19:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1E243B822; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:19:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:19:03 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Matthew Smith Message-ID: <20051106231903.GA46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:19:06 -0000 --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 06:58:38AM +1030, Matthew Smith wrote: > >>I assume that there's a kernel module not loaded, so after looking > >>further through the documentation, I found that I should be able to put > >>a line in /boot/defaults/loader.conf. Since the installation so far was > >>actually bootable (that's one up on Linux!), I did this. All this did > >>for me was to generate a warning that the module was already loaded. > >=20 > > Then try to use the "something weird" as the ethernet device. >=20 > Thanks for that Roland - I've had another look, but the "something > weird" is PLIP, which I believe to be some parallel port communication > system. Yes, that's IP over a parallel port.=20 > So, my real question remains: how does one get a network card > recognised? You don't have to. The GENERIC kernel comes with all network card drivers built as modules. If FreeBSD has a driver for your network chip/card, it should show up. If it doesn't, make sure that it's not disabled in the BIOS and that the cable is actually connected to the hub/router. If none of that works, try to give us some details about the chip/card. Make and model if possible. I've never done a network install, but look at section 2.2.4 of the Handbook. It describes what info you need to have on-hand for a network install. If you don't want to type all these numbers in, configure a machine on the network that you are connecting to as a DHCP server. Of course, you must also have an FTP server available if you want to do an FTP install. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbo9nEnfvsMMhpyURAlC6AJ4pB1eJjCopVpft+aEUcUt/GHLAXgCgiyCa NSgFIIr82DbMjgZmdz7ZtEs= =mgcg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 23:24:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CFB16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB2B43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA6NOj5b015847; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:24:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C8E27B822; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:24:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:24:44 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Jeffrey Ellis Message-ID: <20051106232444.GB46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Jeffrey Ellis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More help with find X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:24:48 -0000 --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:40:12PM -0800, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > What I really need is an expression which will ls all files found which h= ave > a mod. date/time of more than a certain number of days from today, but th= at > are *not* in the Volumes directory, i.e., only those results which exist = on > the startup volume. >=20 > Is there a way to do this? The FreeBSD version of find has the '-x' option that does what you want. Don't know what kind of 'find' darwin uses. GNU find has a similar option.=20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDbpC8EnfvsMMhpyURAl4SAJ0fNRKSv12xHrB9cVJcJgck5zyh8QCfWIUQ 1osbTDyGzQNZQMGrEHNJLrQ= =2N2m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 6 23:58:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9377D16A41F for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED74A43D45 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:58:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from [203.122.211.161] (ppp211-161.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.122.211.161]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jA6Nwj6s026391 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:28:46 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Message-ID: <436E98B4.5080708@kbc.net.au> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:28:44 +1030 From: Matthew Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> <20051106231903.GA46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20051106231903.GA46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:58:50 -0000 >>So, my real question remains: how does one get a network card >>recognised? > > You don't have to. The GENERIC kernel comes with all network card > drivers built as modules. If FreeBSD has a driver for your network > chip/card, it should show up. It's a generic PCI card based on the Realtek 8139C - the hardware file on CD1 suggests that this is supported. Motherboard is an old Gigabyte GA71XE4 with an AMD Duron 850. > If it doesn't, make sure that it's not disabled in the BIOS and that the > cable is actually connected to the hub/router. The card and connection certainly work - this box is normally a Linux machine, but currently has a 2.5" hard disc in so that I can get FreeBSD installed and then transfer to an old ThinkPad. Light showing all OK on Ethernet switch. I can't see anything in the BIOS (AMIBIOS) that should be stopping it other than PnP OS Installed=No. (This doesn't affect operation under Linux.) > If none of that works, try to give us some details about the > chip/card. Make and model if possible. The big worry is that Ethernet doesn't even come up as an option. Think I'll try a card with a different chipset and see if that helps any. I've just had a look through /var/log/messages and have spotted some lines that may be relevant: {timestamp} kernel: re0: couldn't map ports/memory {timestamp} kernel: rl0: couldn't map ports/memory {timestamp} kernel: pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) Cheers M -- Matthew Smith South Australia http://www.kbc.net.au From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 00:23:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A3116A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:23:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB46D43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:23:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (snipe.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by grog.secure-computing.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA70Nghx001149 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:23:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=grog; d=secure-computing.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:x-spam-status:x-spam-checker-version; b=OVxx0PuGtvDYZB0xFotLstQvYyoLwVLZnAn14X0cRSE0D8/YfyUMoBleavlyZKetJ fKjObp82OdEPiCPrX9ZAw== In-Reply-To: <20051106224550.GA3718@kryten.xk7.net> References: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> <436E60FC.5050009@makeworld.com> <20051106204732.GB755@kryten.xk7.net> <436E8682.5030306@makeworld.com> <20051106224550.GA3718@kryten.xk7.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0358753F-3003-4A76-AC33-FB5BFBA2AEFE@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:22:58 -0600 To: Paul Waring X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on grog.secure-computing.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Edwin D. Vinas" Subject: Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:23:17 -0000 On Nov 6, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Paul Waring wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:41:06PM -0600, Chris wrote: >> It may not be necessary - but to do it right... I for one like to >> have >> mu IP's resolve both forward and reverse. It's just professional >> looking >> as a whole. > > I like to have my IPs resolve both ways too, but try finding an ISP > who > will either give you that sort of control through delegation or is > willing to setup the required reverse DNS records on their side. If > you're lucky you'll get customer114324.myisp.net to play with. I don't > know of any residential ISPs, at least not in the UK, who will do that > sort of thing. > > Having said that, there's nothing particularly "wrong" about not > having > reverse DNS records for IPs, or having ones that don't match. It only > really matters if you're sending out email to people with overly > aggressive spam filters that check for that sort of thing. > > Paul Actually, my ISP, ipHouse.net is one who's willing to configure reverse DNS for you. Qwest Communications is another one who'll setup DNS for you, and they're HUGE. If you choose to go with ipHouse, tell them I sent you -- then I get free DSL for a month! ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 00:29:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B7D16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:29:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D559343D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:29:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA70TJW8004854 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:29:19 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106182349.025dd7c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:29:14 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com Subject: 6.0 panics on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:29:34 -0000 I have a computer that has been running FreeBSD 4.X and 5.X without problems. It runs 5.4 with no problems at all. This system has an Intel 845 Motherboard and chipset, Intel Pentium 4 1.6 GHz CPU, 1 GB RAM, NVidea GEForce MX/MX 400 video card, atapi CD-RW, IDE hard drive, standard floppy. Nothing very exotic in this hardware. I tried first to cvsup to 6.0, and rebuild everything. The build was fine including a custom kernel, but when I tried to boot the new 6.0, I got a panic, Fatal trap 12, page fault at the NVidea driver in the boot. So I re-booted the kernel.old, reverted my sources to 5.4 and rebuilt the system all again. As the system rebuilt I downloaded and burned the ISO 6.0 image. I tried to boot the ISO image and do a binary upgrade. The CD booted 6.0 fine, and the upgrade installed with only one error that the X.org was already present. When I tried to boot the new 6.0 GENERIC kernel that was installed, I got the same panic/page fault error I had when I updated via cvsup. But since the same GENERIC kernel boots fine from CD I suspect there may be some loader options I might need? I'd appreciate any help with getting 6.0 to boot without the panic. Thanks Here is the dmesg from the last boot to give any details anyone might want on this system: ============================================================= Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8 #1: Sat Nov 5 23:43:05 CST 2005 root@betty.computinginnovations.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BETTY Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1600MHz (1594.83-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf0a Stepping = 10 Features=0x3febfbff real memory = 1073479680 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1036734464 (988 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 cpu0: port 0x530-0x537 on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xefffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 nvidia0: mem 0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff,0xfd000000-0xfdffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 dc0: port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem 0xfeaffc00-0xfeaffcff irq 23 at device 11.0 on pci2 miibus0: on dc0 dcphy0: on miibus0 dcphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto dc0: Ethernet address: 00:00:94:c8:52:68 dc0: if_start running deferred for Giant isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xef40-0xef5f irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) uhci1: port 0xef80-0xef9f irq 23 at device 31.4 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcm0: port 0xef00-0xef3f,0xe800-0xe8ff irq 17 at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f4-0x3f5,0x3f2-0x3f3,0x3f0-0x3f1 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcc7ff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 uhub2: Intel product 0x1120, class 9/0, rev 1.10/0.00, addr 2 uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1594831964 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec ad0: 117246MB [238216/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: CDRW at ata1-master PIO4 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 16.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 00:29:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A0516A42C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A13D43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so278913wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:29:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=khwHBqP5A5SEbSbYtepkZthk2XVy6Q/FKooNOWhsMeff0e10QkL7u7fJOI+VcbweCD2A1MRUGznqNjsnYETHwUorGsx08g06GK0zBCA+TYw0fYAJ9IIGUbraDBp9bBNYXjK00hqSJ0IRqiPTY02UujaKVnpXGXlWedZCpe9+YMA= Received: by 10.70.122.10 with SMTP id u10mr4411484wxc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:29:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.91.17 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:29:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57416b300511061629pe663a97x8159994edfa377d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:29:49 +1100 From: Peter Clutton To: Aubrey{Al} Dunn In-Reply-To: <436E6F3A.7020504@charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <436E6F3A.7020504@charter.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:29:50 -0000 On 11/7/05, Aubrey{Al} Dunn wrote: > I am currently trying to install freebsd 6.0 and the problem is that > freebsd will not see my windows or netbsd side at all. All it See's > is the whole disk and nothing else. I would like to install freebsd > on the netbsd side but I do want to lost my windows installation. I think if you actually make a fat32 partition from inside Windows, then do the install on that, that will work, and you should be able to see it. Could be wrong though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 00:30:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5BC16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC43343D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:30:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (snipe.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by grog.secure-computing.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA70Ujl8001172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:30:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=grog; d=secure-computing.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:x-spam-status:x-spam-checker-version; b=QaCA8dCz51ve+znvPbButB6FBF8xIqfntB7qQXxJG/ueqU558FpdOOLHhHoVn8gxz hUtXF5VxK05BFLRwcfmhw== In-Reply-To: <436E98B4.5080708@kbc.net.au> References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> <20051106231903.GA46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E98B4.5080708@kbc.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <2A52F60F-4FAA-4A78-A5BB-AB3B598A6B1B@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:30:08 -0600 To: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on grog.secure-computing.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:30:25 -0000 On Nov 6, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Matthew Smith wrote: > I've just had a look through /var/log/messages and have spotted some > lines that may be relevant: > > {timestamp} kernel: re0: couldn't map ports/memory > {timestamp} kernel: rl0: couldn't map ports/memory > {timestamp} kernel: pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver > attached) Well, the second line there, referencing rl0 is indeed the Realtek driver for the network card. The error, on the other hand, is something I'm not familiar with. Reading through the archives, I see the following link: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-December/ 067477.html In this post, this excerpt seems to apply: [QUOTE] I upgraded my laptop (Fujitsu-Siemens Lifebook C4355) to 5.3 this week, and had the same problem. My card started working when i disabled ACPI. I don't have a sufficiently pointy hat to tell you _why_ this happened... It shouldn't be like that, separate parts of the system, mumble grumble, but in the spirit of empirical observation: It Worked For Me. [/QUOTE] HTH ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 00:55:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C601E16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:55:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp2.linkline.com (smtp2.linkline.com [64.30.215.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6253E43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:55:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp2.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1C32CA; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:54:55 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:54:57 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: Roland Smith , Jeffrey Ellis Message-ID: Thread-Topic: More help with find Thread-Index: AcXjNd9bHed6P08pEdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <20051106232444.GB46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More help with find X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:55:00 -0000 Hi, Roland-- That works great -- thank you! Ok... Would you mind if I asked you the next step? I'm now able to find all the files on the startup volume and not any other volumes. But now I need to be able to also see that same criteria for a particular volume which is *not* the startup drive, i.e., a specific volume which is contained in the Volumes directory, say 'foo'. In other words, I need to be able to isolate particular volumes to perform the find. I then would like to be able to have the modification date and filesize added to the display of the path and filename, and then sort the results by the mod. date in descending order. Is there a way to do that? All My Best, Jeffrey on 11/6/05 3:24 PM, Roland Smith at rsmith@xs4all.nl wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:40:12PM -0800, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > >> What I really need is an expression which will ls all files found which have >> a mod. date/time of more than a certain number of days from today, but that >> are *not* in the Volumes directory, i.e., only those results which exist on >> the startup volume. >> >> Is there a way to do this? > > The FreeBSD version of find has the '-x' option that does what you > want. Don't know what kind of 'find' darwin uses. GNU find has a similar > option. > > Roland From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 00:58:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C7B16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:58:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp2.linkline.com (smtp2.linkline.com [64.30.215.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4139943D6A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:58:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp2.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD9C16C; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:58:38 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:58:37 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: Roland Smith , Jeffrey Ellis Message-ID: Thread-Topic: More help with find Thread-Index: AcXjNmJ8oVNzNk8pEdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <20051106232444.GB46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More help with find X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:58:44 -0000 Hi, Rolland-- Ok. Stupid of me. Find -x /volumes/foo/* Seems to work fine. So I guess now I'm just left with the display and sorting questions. All My Best, Jeffrey on 11/6/05 3:24 PM, Roland Smith at rsmith@xs4all.nl wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:40:12PM -0800, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > >> What I really need is an expression which will ls all files found which have >> a mod. date/time of more than a certain number of days from today, but that >> are *not* in the Volumes directory, i.e., only those results which exist on >> the startup volume. >> >> Is there a way to do this? > > The FreeBSD version of find has the '-x' option that does what you > want. Don't know what kind of 'find' darwin uses. GNU find has a similar > option. > > Roland From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:01:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F1416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:01:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB6743D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:01:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from [10.0.10.6] (really [154.20.242.227]) by priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051107010128.TSIO1819.priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net@[10.0.10.6]> for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:01:28 -0700 From: Dave Webster To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:59:33 -0800 Message-Id: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:01:31 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to: pkg_add -r openoffice and I get the following: /var: write failed, filesystem is full mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', you're on your own! That last part is particularily chilling - if I'm on my own, I'm hooped! Here's the result of df -h: Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 248M 93M 135M 41% / devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev /dev/ad0s1e 248M 294K 228M 0% /tmp /dev/ad0s1f 72G 25G 42G 37% /usr /dev/ad0s1d 248M 62M 166M 27% /var linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc Any suggestions on what I should do? thanx in advance, Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:06:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7178416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:06:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D950F43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:06:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (snipe.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by grog.secure-computing.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA716gvW029416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:06:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=grog; d=secure-computing.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:x-spam-status:x-spam-checker-version; b=ODgiAN3FsQsrPi9yi5A7PgxHDbx1VHrFx1f31TH1GQDag2ggb5Rufqmt8jWth7Ik9 aTDJG0sm7pU+mkAjl3oPQ== In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <942B5207-1535-414A-8F41-BEECD9D90375@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:06:05 -0600 To: Jeffrey Ellis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on grog.secure-computing.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More help with find X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:06:17 -0000 On Nov 6, 2005, at 6:58 PM, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > Hi, Rolland-- > > Ok. Stupid of me. > > Find -x /volumes/foo/* > > Seems to work fine. So I guess now I'm just left with the display and > sorting questions. > > All My Best, > Jeffrey Jeffrey, man find is your friend. Even though you're using Darwin, the man pages are still there. Simply go to a terminal and type: # man find If there's a particular page you're looking for, such as page 5, type: # man 5 find In this particular instance, there is no section 5 for find. For further help on using the man(ual), type: # man man HTH ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:07:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797AF16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:07:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7E243D62 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:07:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so283561wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:07:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=t2wSKxl1OJY6xC6y7vxmBUtNGR2ItS9sR8j3EX6V5y7ZU8dpBp3p3Q1HY19bt2ESlrZfXpYfNwgyl2EevbPV1y8oV868vsWiHkcwj5tBdnQ55XSq/fXyMa8sqKXzKMpBTLPQxRWcmT7SckTDlFDmnoc/NctOb30PeePQXcmgeok= Received: by 10.70.118.14 with SMTP id q14mr4430901wxc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:07:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h39sm2846208wxd.2005.11.06.17.07.07; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:07:07 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:58:29 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511061658.30611.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Webster Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:07:15 -0000 On Sunday 06 November 2005 16:59, Dave Webster wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to: pkg_add -r openoffice and I get the following: > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', you're > on your own! > > That last part is particularily chilling - if I'm on my own, I'm hooped! > > Here's the result of df -h: > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 248M 93M 135M 41% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/ad0s1e 248M 294K 228M 0% /tmp > /dev/ad0s1f 72G 25G 42G 37% /usr > /dev/ad0s1d 248M 62M 166M 27% /var > linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc > > Any suggestions on what I should do? > thanx in advance, > Dave In /etc/rc.conf set: clear_tmp_enable="NO" to clear_tmp_enable="YES" then reboot. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:08:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5409216A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:08:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EB443D5E for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:08:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (snipe.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by grog.secure-computing.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA718Qt0032165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:08:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=grog; d=secure-computing.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:x-spam-status:x-spam-checker-version; b=r4iWR4b7XEbnkQLaoJoZL3X2d4gzNKZete2/gxhhma7H6A4c47H5WdEWHQMJyLayx 4fL3/AoSAUC5YPyg05kdg== In-Reply-To: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:07:49 -0600 To: Dave Webster X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on grog.secure-computing.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:08:15 -0000 On Nov 6, 2005, at 6:59 PM, Dave Webster wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to: pkg_add -r openoffice and I get the following: > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', > you're > on your own! > > That last part is particularily chilling - if I'm on my own, I'm > hooped! > > Here's the result of df -h: > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 248M 93M 135M 41% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/ad0s1e 248M 294K 228M 0% /tmp > /dev/ad0s1f 72G 25G 42G 37% /usr > /dev/ad0s1d 248M 62M 166M 27% /var > linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc > > Any suggestions on what I should do? > thanx in advance, > Dave > Try this: # du -hd2 /var Post that here, or reply directly to me. ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:09:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2711416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:09:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC59343D5C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:09:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn-mobile.antimatter.net (cpe-66-91-226-109.san.res.rr.com [66.91.226.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by cobalt.antimatter.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA719m4i003019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:09:49 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051106170511.03899610@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:06:08 -0800 To: Dave Webster , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:09:52 -0000 At 04:59 PM 11/6/2005, Dave Webster wrote: >Hi, >I'm trying to: pkg_add -r openoffice and I get the following: > >/var: write failed, filesystem is full >mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device >pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', you're >on your own! > >That last part is particularily chilling - if I'm on my own, I'm hooped! > >Here's the result of df -h: > >Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >/dev/ad0s1a 248M 93M 135M 41% / >devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev >/dev/ad0s1e 248M 294K 228M 0% /tmp >/dev/ad0s1f 72G 25G 42G 37% /usr >/dev/ad0s1d 248M 62M 166M 27% /var >linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc You probably ran out of inodes. What does df -i show? -Glenn >Any suggestions on what I should do? >thanx in advance, >Dave > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:17:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2350D16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:17:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7490D43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:17:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from [10.10.10.210] (ppp211-161.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.122.211.161]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jA71H3V1071542 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:47:05 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Message-ID: <436EAB0E.2080104@kbc.net.au> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:47:02 +1030 From: Matthew Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> <20051106231903.GA46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E98B4.5080708@kbc.net.au> <2A52F60F-4FAA-4A78-A5BB-AB3B598A6B1B@secure-computing.net> In-Reply-To: <2A52F60F-4FAA-4A78-A5BB-AB3B598A6B1B@secure-computing.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:17:07 -0000 Eric F Crist wrote: > On Nov 6, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Matthew Smith wrote: > >> I've just had a look through /var/log/messages and have spotted some >> lines that may be relevant: >> >> {timestamp} kernel: re0: couldn't map ports/memory >> {timestamp} kernel: rl0: couldn't map ports/memory >> {timestamp} kernel: pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver >> attached) > > Well, the second line there, referencing rl0 is indeed the Realtek > driver for the network card. The error, on the other hand, is > something I'm not familiar with. > > Reading through the archives, I see the following link: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-December/ > 067477.html My card started working when i disabled ACPI. Hmm - thanks for the suggestion, I should have tried this; every time I've had ACPI enabled under Linux, it has broken something. However, I have just tried booting with ACPI disabled with the FreeBSD boot disk and the minimal installation that managed to get on my hard disk - the result is that FreeBSD cannot find any drives! So, worth a try, but not the solution. Furthermore, I have now tried swapping the Realtek card for a D-Link (DFE530TX) one. The problem persists... Just a minor point - is 6 actually a stable version? I was wondering whether I've gone and picked up a development version when I should have been using 5.something. Cheers M -- Matthew Smith Kadina Business Consultancy, South Australia Work: Personal: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:19:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC4F16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:19:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7264543D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:19:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (nieser.net [194.109.160.131]) by smtp-vbr5.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA71Ivcb053498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:18:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <436EAB84.5000504@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:19:00 +0100 From: Hans Nieser User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Ragona References: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106182349.025dd7c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106182349.025dd7c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 panics on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:19:07 -0000 Derek Ragona wrote: > > I have a computer that has been running FreeBSD 4.X and 5.X without > problems. It runs 5.4 with no problems at all. This system has an > Intel 845 Motherboard and chipset, Intel Pentium 4 1.6 GHz CPU, 1 GB > RAM, NVidea GEForce MX/MX 400 video card, atapi CD-RW, IDE hard drive, > standard floppy. Nothing very exotic in this hardware. > > I tried first to cvsup to 6.0, and rebuild everything. The build was > fine including a custom kernel, but when I tried to boot the new 6.0, I > got a panic, Fatal trap 12, page fault at the NVidea driver in the > boot. So I re-booted the kernel.old, reverted my sources to 5.4 and > rebuilt the system all again. > > As the system rebuilt I downloaded and burned the ISO 6.0 image. > > I tried to boot the ISO image and do a binary upgrade. The CD booted > 6.0 fine, and the upgrade installed with only one error that the X.org > was already present. When I tried to boot the new 6.0 GENERIC kernel > that was installed, I got the same panic/page fault error I had when I > updated via cvsup. > > But since the same GENERIC kernel boots fine from CD I suspect there may > be some loader options I might need? I'd appreciate any help with > getting 6.0 to boot without the panic. > > Thanks Hi Derek, You probably just have to stop the nvidia driver from loading by specifying "unset nvidia_load" at the boot prompt and reinstall the nvidia driver once the system is booted. That's what I did at least, and I have had no problems while I've heard from other people that didn't disable and rebuilt their nvidia drivers that they also got panics on boot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:20:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFAB16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B8343D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (snipe.secure-computing.net [216.243.161.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by grog.secure-computing.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA71Kplr050278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:20:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=grog; d=secure-computing.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc: content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer:x-spam-status:x-spam-checker-version; b=EC57wq+3eqqnMdbnebXOM6+lc4I2g/OfTvNEZvStAnJnVhpBvH8yODkFwO+KkvPMY qY8E1eWddGuAWUuwuM6mg== In-Reply-To: <436EAB0E.2080104@kbc.net.au> References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> <20051106231903.GA46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E98B4.5080708@kbc.net.au> <2A52F60F-4FAA-4A78-A5BB-AB3B598A6B1B@secure-computing.net> <436EAB0E.2080104@kbc.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <191587E5-6B8F-47D4-9156-C0B162A59DE3@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:20:14 -0600 To: Matthew Smith X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on grog.secure-computing.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:20:25 -0000 On Nov 6, 2005, at 7:17 PM, Matthew Smith wrote: > Just a minor point - is 6 actually a stable version? I was wondering > whether I've gone and picked up a development version when I should > have > been using 5.something. It's officially a RELEASE, but I won't trust it until 6.3 or later on a production machine. Unless you're using some really special/new hardware, I would recommend attempting to install 5.4. ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:34:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32ED716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:34:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8922A43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:34:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA71Ye64005447; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:34:40 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106193209.025ddee0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:34:33 -0600 To: Hans Nieser From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <436EAB84.5000504@xs4all.nl> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106182349.025dd7c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <436EAB84.5000504@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 panics on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:34:56 -0000 At 07:19 PM 11/6/2005, Hans Nieser wrote: >Derek Ragona wrote: >>I have a computer that has been running FreeBSD 4.X and 5.X without >>problems. It runs 5.4 with no problems at all. This system has an Intel >>845 Motherboard and chipset, Intel Pentium 4 1.6 GHz CPU, 1 GB RAM, >>NVidea GEForce MX/MX 400 video card, atapi CD-RW, IDE hard drive, >>standard floppy. Nothing very exotic in this hardware. >>I tried first to cvsup to 6.0, and rebuild everything. The build was >>fine including a custom kernel, but when I tried to boot the new 6.0, I >>got a panic, Fatal trap 12, page fault at the NVidea driver in the >>boot. So I re-booted the kernel.old, reverted my sources to 5.4 and >>rebuilt the system all again. >>As the system rebuilt I downloaded and burned the ISO 6.0 image. >>I tried to boot the ISO image and do a binary upgrade. The CD booted 6.0 >>fine, and the upgrade installed with only one error that the X.org was >>already present. When I tried to boot the new 6.0 GENERIC kernel that >>was installed, I got the same panic/page fault error I had when I updated >>via cvsup. >>But since the same GENERIC kernel boots fine from CD I suspect there may >>be some loader options I might need? I'd appreciate any help with >>getting 6.0 to boot without the panic. >>Thanks > >Hi Derek, > >You probably just have to stop the nvidia driver from loading by >specifying "unset nvidia_load" at the boot prompt and reinstall the nvidia >driver once the system is booted. > >That's what I did at least, and I have had no problems while I've heard >from other people that didn't disable and rebuilt their nvidia drivers >that they also got panics on boot. Hans, Let me see if I understand the process. When I go to boot 6.0, escape to the boot prompt, then type: unset nvidia_load Once the system boots then, how do I reinstall the nvidia driver? That last step has me confused. Would I rebuild the kernel again? Or something else? -Derek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:39:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC1716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:39:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net (ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C2043D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:39:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from [10.10.10.210] (ppp211-161.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.122.211.161]) by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jA71dJ7Z080685 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:09:20 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Message-ID: <436EB046.1010305@kbc.net.au> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:09:18 +1030 From: Matthew Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> <20051106231903.GA46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E98B4.5080708@kbc.net.au> <2A52F60F-4FAA-4A78-A5BB-AB3B598A6B1B@secure-computing.net> <436EAB0E.2080104@kbc.net.au> <191587E5-6B8F-47D4-9156-C0B162A59DE3@secure-computing.net> In-Reply-To: <191587E5-6B8F-47D4-9156-C0B162A59DE3@secure-computing.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:39:24 -0000 Eric F Crist wrote: > On Nov 6, 2005, at 7:17 PM, Matthew Smith wrote: > >> Just a minor point - is 6 actually a stable version? I was wondering >> whether I've gone and picked up a development version when I should have >> been using 5.something. > > It's officially a RELEASE, but I won't trust it until 6.3 or later on a > production machine. Unless you're using some really special/new > hardware, I would recommend attempting to install 5.4. Thanks - I'm using extremely non-special and old hardware, so I'll grab the 5.4 release and start over. Hopefully I'll have more luck this time... I will report back. Cheers M -- Matthew Smith Kadina Business Consultancy, South Australia Work: Personal: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 01:54:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCB716A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0679743D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 01:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (nieser.net [194.109.160.131]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA71sYHd032460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:54:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <436EB3DD.4050003@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:54:37 +0100 From: Hans Nieser User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Ragona References: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106182349.025dd7c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <436EAB84.5000504@xs4all.nl> <6.0.0.22.2.20051106193209.025ddee0@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106193209.025ddee0@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 panics on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:54:43 -0000 Derek Ragona wrote: > At 07:19 PM 11/6/2005, Hans Nieser wrote: > >> Derek Ragona wrote: >> >>> I have a computer that has been running FreeBSD 4.X and 5.X without >>> problems. It runs 5.4 with no problems at all. This system has an >>> Intel 845 Motherboard and chipset, Intel Pentium 4 1.6 GHz CPU, 1 GB >>> RAM, NVidea GEForce MX/MX 400 video card, atapi CD-RW, IDE hard >>> drive, standard floppy. Nothing very exotic in this hardware. >>> I tried first to cvsup to 6.0, and rebuild everything. The build was >>> fine including a custom kernel, but when I tried to boot the new 6.0, >>> I got a panic, Fatal trap 12, page fault at the NVidea driver in the >>> boot. So I re-booted the kernel.old, reverted my sources to 5.4 and >>> rebuilt the system all again. >>> As the system rebuilt I downloaded and burned the ISO 6.0 image. >>> I tried to boot the ISO image and do a binary upgrade. The CD booted >>> 6.0 fine, and the upgrade installed with only one error that the >>> X.org was already present. When I tried to boot the new 6.0 GENERIC >>> kernel that was installed, I got the same panic/page fault error I >>> had when I updated via cvsup. >>> But since the same GENERIC kernel boots fine from CD I suspect there >>> may be some loader options I might need? I'd appreciate any help >>> with getting 6.0 to boot without the panic. >>> Thanks >> >> >> Hi Derek, >> >> You probably just have to stop the nvidia driver from loading by >> specifying "unset nvidia_load" at the boot prompt and reinstall the >> nvidia driver once the system is booted. >> >> That's what I did at least, and I have had no problems while I've >> heard from other people that didn't disable and rebuilt their nvidia >> drivers that they also got panics on boot. > > Hans, > > Let me see if I understand the process. When I go to boot 6.0, escape > to the boot prompt, then type: > unset nvidia_load > > Once the system boots then, how do I reinstall the nvidia driver? That > last step has me confused. Would I rebuild the kernel again? Or > something else? I (hopefully correctly) assumed you were using NVIDIA's own native drivers for FreeBSD as a loadable module (from the x11/nvidia-driver port), if so, then after booting without the nvidia module loaded, a "portupgrade -f nvidia-driver" should do the trick (or pkg_delete nvidia-driver && cd /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver && make install clean). But just in case, this is how I upgraded my system; I deleted all the ports/packages I had installed (since they have to be rebuilt for 6.0 anyway) with "pkg_delete -a", cvsupped ports and the RELENG_6_0 sources, rebuilt the kernel/world, commented out any third party modules (including nvidia) in /boot/loader.conf, rebooted and installed all the packages (including x11/nvidia-driver) I needed, and that's basically it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 02:15:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC62116A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:15:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A5343D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:15:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA72FGZT005837; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:15:16 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106200927.026239b8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:15:09 -0600 To: Hans Nieser From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <436EB3DD.4050003@xs4all.nl> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106182349.025dd7c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <436EAB84.5000504@xs4all.nl> <6.0.0.22.2.20051106193209.025ddee0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <436EB3DD.4050003@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 panics on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:15:32 -0000 At 07:54 PM 11/6/2005, Hans Nieser wrote: >Derek Ragona wrote: >>At 07:19 PM 11/6/2005, Hans Nieser wrote: >> >>>Derek Ragona wrote: >>> >>>>I have a computer that has been running FreeBSD 4.X and 5.X without >>>>problems. It runs 5.4 with no problems at all. This system has an >>>>Intel 845 Motherboard and chipset, Intel Pentium 4 1.6 GHz CPU, 1 GB >>>>RAM, NVidea GEForce MX/MX 400 video card, atapi CD-RW, IDE hard drive, >>>>standard floppy. Nothing very exotic in this hardware. >>>>I tried first to cvsup to 6.0, and rebuild everything. The build was >>>>fine including a custom kernel, but when I tried to boot the new 6.0, I >>>>got a panic, Fatal trap 12, page fault at the NVidea driver in the >>>>boot. So I re-booted the kernel.old, reverted my sources to 5.4 and >>>>rebuilt the system all again. >>>>As the system rebuilt I downloaded and burned the ISO 6.0 image. >>>>I tried to boot the ISO image and do a binary upgrade. The CD booted >>>>6.0 fine, and the upgrade installed with only one error that the X.org >>>>was already present. When I tried to boot the new 6.0 GENERIC kernel >>>>that was installed, I got the same panic/page fault error I had when I >>>>updated via cvsup. >>>>But since the same GENERIC kernel boots fine from CD I suspect there >>>>may be some loader options I might need? I'd appreciate any help with >>>>getting 6.0 to boot without the panic. >>>>Thanks >>> >>> >>>Hi Derek, >>> >>>You probably just have to stop the nvidia driver from loading by >>>specifying "unset nvidia_load" at the boot prompt and reinstall the >>>nvidia driver once the system is booted. >>> >>>That's what I did at least, and I have had no problems while I've heard >>>from other people that didn't disable and rebuilt their nvidia drivers >>>that they also got panics on boot. >>Hans, >>Let me see if I understand the process. When I go to boot 6.0, escape to >>the boot prompt, then type: >>unset nvidia_load >>Once the system boots then, how do I reinstall the nvidia driver? That >>last step has me confused. Would I rebuild the kernel again? Or >>something else? > >I (hopefully correctly) assumed you were using NVIDIA's own native drivers >for FreeBSD as a loadable module (from the x11/nvidia-driver port), if so, >then after booting without the nvidia module loaded, a "portupgrade -f >nvidia-driver" should do the trick (or pkg_delete nvidia-driver && cd >/usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver && make install clean). > >But just in case, this is how I upgraded my system; I deleted all the >ports/packages I had installed (since they have to be rebuilt for 6.0 >anyway) with "pkg_delete -a", cvsupped ports and the RELENG_6_0 sources, >rebuilt the kernel/world, commented out any third party modules (including >nvidia) in /boot/loader.conf, rebooted and installed all the packages >(including x11/nvidia-driver) I needed, and that's basically it. > Yes I am using the nvidia driver that is from x11/nvidia-driver. I guess since I don't have the system boot into X, this didn't occur to me. It makes sense that the problem is this driver getting loaded at boot since it is in my loader.conf and the CD doesn't have that. I figured it would be something simple I was tripping on. Thanks for the help, I will try it and see how it works out. -Derek >Yes I am using the nvidia driver that is from x11/nvidia-driver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 02:27:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6409516A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:27:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from vfemail.net (miwi2dsl-a234.wi.tds.net [216.170.248.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D981743D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:27:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: (qmail 36550 invoked by uid 85); 7 Nov 2005 02:27:14 -0000 Received: from akbeech@gmail.com by mail.vfemail.net by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.75.1. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:. Processed in 1.599148 secs); 07 Nov 2005 02:27:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.241.108?) (alaska@vfemail.net@24.237.206.237) by miwi2dsl-a234.wi.tds.net with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 02:27:12 -0000 From: Beecher Rintoul Organization: NorthWind Communications To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 17:24:32 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1238155.eJO19XQbB5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511061724.53128.akbeech@gmail.com> Cc: Micah Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:27:18 -0000 --nextPart1238155.eJO19XQbB5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 06 November 2005 12:20 pm, Micah wrote: > My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was upgrading > Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It looks like sometime > around 11:30pm the computer reset. This morning I'm trying to reinstall > all the software that got lost in last night's reset and I get another > reset in the middle of compiling. The last message in /var/log/messages > before reboot is: > Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 > Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 > Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel > > I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing it's a > hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? > > Thanks, > Micah I had the exact same problem on a machine that I know doesn't have any=20 hardware problems. I should have just aborted that "script" when it started= =20 removing anything dependent on the new gnome libs. If you got as far as the= =20 new gnome progs installed. Just rebuild what you need. And use the "r" fla= g.=20 I'd much rather have a lib not found error than rebuild the way that "scrip= t"=20 does. I'm sure this is going to bite quite a few people before it's over. =46WIW I have the new kde back up with no errors, and I'll just deal with a= ny=20 other problems as they occur. Beech =2D-=20 DISCLAIMER: No electrons were harmed during the making of this message. =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@gmail.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart1238155.eJO19XQbB5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDbrr0Vq19LUoGB+MRAvEzAKDRnDNzofQca7JKjFpDQF/rm+GyBgCglyHv 5TKWbNZegrx3KscH4rasVdQ= =Gi8x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1238155.eJO19XQbB5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 02:27:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8A116A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:27:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FB043D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from [10.0.10.6] (really [154.20.242.227]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051107022721.TGTJ16348.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@[10.0.10.6]>; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:27:21 -0700 From: Dave Webster To: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051106170511.03899610@cobalt.antimatter.net> References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <6.2.3.4.2.20051106170511.03899610@cobalt.antimatter.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:25:27 -0800 Message-Id: <1131330327.3160.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:27:25 -0000 Thanks for your reply: df -i shows: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted o n /dev/ad0s1a 253678 95568 137816 41% 2400 30622 7% / devfs 1 1 0 100% 0 0 100% /dev /dev/ad0s1e 253678 294 233090 0% 28 32994 0% /tmp /dev/ad0s1f 75780150 25875488 43842250 37% 674565 9123065 7% /usr /dev/ad0s1d 253678 63504 169880 27% 2827 30195 9% /var linprocfs 4 4 0 100% 1 0 100% /usr/comp at/linux/proc On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:06 -0800, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 04:59 PM 11/6/2005, Dave Webster wrote: > >Hi, > >I'm trying to: pkg_add -r openoffice and I get the following: > > > >/var: write failed, filesystem is full > >mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > >pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', you're > >on your own! > > > >That last part is particularily chilling - if I'm on my own, I'm hooped! > > > >Here's the result of df -h: > > > >Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > >/dev/ad0s1a 248M 93M 135M 41% / > >devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > >/dev/ad0s1e 248M 294K 228M 0% /tmp > >/dev/ad0s1f 72G 25G 42G 37% /usr > >/dev/ad0s1d 248M 62M 166M 27% /var > >linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc > > You probably ran out of inodes. What does df -i show? > > -Glenn > > > >Any suggestions on what I should do? > >thanx in advance, > >Dave > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 02:43:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB6C16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:43:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D972543D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:43:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 14588 invoked by uid 502); 7 Nov 2005 02:43:05 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 02:43:05 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <436EBF38.6000309@ywave.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:43:04 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Beecher Rintoul References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <200511061724.53128.akbeech@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200511061724.53128.akbeech@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:43:07 -0000 Beecher Rintoul wrote: > On Sunday 06 November 2005 12:20 pm, Micah wrote: > >>My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was upgrading >>Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It looks like sometime >>around 11:30pm the computer reset. This morning I'm trying to reinstall >>all the software that got lost in last night's reset and I get another >>reset in the middle of compiling. The last message in /var/log/messages >>before reboot is: >>Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 >>Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 >>Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel >> >>I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing it's a >>hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? >> >>Thanks, >>Micah > > > I had the exact same problem on a machine that I know doesn't have any > hardware problems. I should have just aborted that "script" when it started > removing anything dependent on the new gnome libs. If you got as far as the > new gnome progs installed. Just rebuild what you need. And use the "r" flag. > I'd much rather have a lib not found error than rebuild the way that "script" > does. I'm sure this is going to bite quite a few people before it's over. > FWIW I have the new kde back up with no errors, and I'll just deal with any > other problems as they occur. > > Beech > Except it reboot later when rebuilding the KDE stuff with portinstall NOT the Gnome script. And I'm getting occasional segmentation faults on Thunderbird and intermittent compiler errors like this one while portinstalling kdepim: then mv -f ".deps/eudora_xxport.Tpo" ".deps/eudora_xxport.Plo"; else rm -f ".deps/eudora_xxport.Tpo"; exit 1; fi eudora_xxport.cpp: In member function `virtual KABC::AddresseeList EudoraXXPort::importContacts(const QString&) const': eudora_xxport.cpp:121: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. Something seems wrong. I don't think a software error should cause a system reboot without any log messages anywhere. Thanks, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 02:48:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3376516A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius_mps@yahoo.com) Received: from web36101.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web36101.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4C5743D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 02:48:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marius_mps@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 42153 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Nov 2005 02:48:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=v9VzQUaqCbBJqvC/cG22xqdZ6rpovU9Mdf/AeVyT9CmO6Pb/Sv3jFt7t7qKwdKkOi4ECmQwQhrP8rlNbDIr8/hMk19MQR3jrDLsojd2XRkIK754d4G2N5jyWGCZ5frjoJm5nClNj6eQ//bHSHlE19l5+6SBo9rJ0mss2hXbKIuM= ; Message-ID: <20051107024854.42151.qmail@web36101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [86.125.54.127] by web36101.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 18:48:54 PST Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:48:54 -0800 (PST) From: Marius Cirsta To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: ppp problem ( pppoe ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:48:55 -0000 I've got to use PPPoE to access the internet through a regular LAN ( my ISP requires it ) . It works on Windows ( using PAP as auth ) and on Linux using rp-pppoe . It seems simple enough to do in FreeBSD but it doesn't work . Here's my ppp.conf file : default: set log Phase tun command # you can add more detailed logging if you wish set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 rds: set device PPPoE:xl0:rds # replace xl1 with your Ethernet device set authname tm212418 set authkey PASS set dial set login add default HISADDR And here's how the log looks and what fails : Nov 7 02:27:55 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: Caught signal 2, abort connection(s) Nov 7 02:28:02 ppp[541]: tun0: Command: /dev/ttyv0: equit Nov 7 02:28:10 ppp[541]: tun0: Command: /dev/ttyv0: call Nov 7 02:28:10 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Establish Nov 7 02:28:10 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: closed -> opening Nov 7 02:28:10 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! Nov 7 02:28:10 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: opening -> dial Nov 7 02:28:10 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: dial -> carrier Nov 7 02:28:11 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: Received NGM_PPPOE_ACNAME (hook "RMSPPPOE") Nov 7 02:28:11 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: Received NGM_PPPOE_SESSIONID Nov 7 02:28:11 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: Received NGM_PPPOE_SUCCESS Nov 7 02:28:11 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier -> login Nov 7 02:28:11 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: login -> lcp Nov 7 02:28:12 ppp[541]: tun0: Warning: deflink: Reducing configured MRU from 1500 to 1492 Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Authenticate Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: his = CHAP 0x81, mine = none Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: Chap Input: CHALLENGE (16 bytes from -) Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: Chap Output: RESPONSE (tm212418) Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: Chap Input: FAILURE (E=691 R=1 C=DBD8E1FC29E5AA114460DFB8BAA09887 V=3) Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: lcp -> logout Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: logout -> hangup Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 4 secs: 267 octets in, 196 octets out Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: 8 packets in, 7 packets out Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: total 115 bytes/sec, peak 38 bytes/sec on Mon Nov 7 02:28:13 2005 Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: deflink: hangup -> closed Nov 7 02:28:14 ppp[541]: tun0: Phase: bundle: Dead It looks to my that it fails on authentification . I would like to use pap as it works in Windows ( I have no idea what rp-pppoe uses ) but I don't know how to do it as deny chap and disable chap don't seem to have any efect ( it still tries chap auth and then fails ) . Any ideas on what to do would be greatly apreciated . I can't use FreeBSD without a working net connection and it's a pity . __________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 03:28:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEE816A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:28:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: from vfemail.net (miwi2dsl-a234.wi.tds.net [216.170.248.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A3B43D4C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:28:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from akbeech@gmail.com) Received: (qmail 78232 invoked by uid 85); 7 Nov 2005 03:28:24 -0000 Received: from akbeech@gmail.com by mail.vfemail.net by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.75.1. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:. Processed in 2.094276 secs); 07 Nov 2005 03:28:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.241.108?) (alaska@vfemail.net@24.237.206.237) by miwi2dsl-a234.wi.tds.net with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 03:28:22 -0000 From: Beecher Rintoul Organization: NorthWind Communications To: Micah Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:27:58 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <200511061724.53128.akbeech@gmail.com> <436EBF38.6000309@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <436EBF38.6000309@ywave.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart282851258.fxjpszou9D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511061828.16327.akbeech@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:28:28 -0000 --nextPart282851258.fxjpszou9D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 06 November 2005 05:43 pm, Micah wrote: > Beecher Rintoul wrote: > > On Sunday 06 November 2005 12:20 pm, Micah wrote: > >>My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was upgrading > >>Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It looks like sometime > >>around 11:30pm the computer reset. This morning I'm trying to reinstall > >>all the software that got lost in last night's reset and I get another > >>reset in the middle of compiling. The last message in /var/log/messages > >>before reboot is: > >>Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 > >>Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 > >>Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel > >> > >>I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing it's a > >>hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? > >> > >>Thanks, > >>Micah > > > > I had the exact same problem on a machine that I know doesn't have any > > hardware problems. I should have just aborted that "script" when it > > started removing anything dependent on the new gnome libs. If you got as > > far as the new gnome progs installed. Just rebuild what you need. And > > use the "r" flag. I'd much rather have a lib not found error than rebui= ld > > the way that "script" does. I'm sure this is going to bite quite a few > > people before it's over. FWIW I have the new kde back up with no errors, > > and I'll just deal with any other problems as they occur. > > > > Beech > > Except it reboot later when rebuilding the KDE stuff with portinstall > NOT the Gnome script. And I'm getting occasional segmentation faults on > Thunderbird and intermittent compiler errors like this one while > portinstalling kdepim: > then mv -f ".deps/eudora_xxport.Tpo" ".deps/eudora_xxport.Plo"; else rm > -f ".deps/eudora_xxport.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > eudora_xxport.cpp: In member function `virtual KABC::AddresseeList > EudoraXXPort::importContacts(const QString&) const': > eudora_xxport.cpp:121: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. > > Something seems wrong. I don't think a software error should cause a > system reboot without any log messages anywhere. > I agree, I've never seen this before either. I just shelled into one of my= =20 office machines running the same update; it's no longer online. The box in= =20 question is a new AMD 64 with 1GB of regestered ram, that has been rock sol= id=20 running 6-stable. When I left last night, It was updating gnome and kde fro= m=20 current ports. I'll drive over after dinner and see what's really happening= =2E=20 =46or now you probably should just cvsup with the date tag set before the g= nome=20 update, delete and it all and start over. On this box, I deleted everything= =20 (which already wasn't) Installed the (new) gnome ports, and so far I have=20 basic kde and firefox installed and working. I would have been really nice = if=20 the coders would reveal why this new script was important. I'll probably fi= nd=20 out the hard way. Beech =2D-=20 DISCLAIMER: No electrons were harmed during the making of this message. =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- Beech Rintoul - System Administrator - akbeech@gmail.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | NorthWind Communications \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \=20 =2D------------------------------------------------------------------------= =2D------------- --nextPart282851258.fxjpszou9D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDbsnQVq19LUoGB+MRAkJKAKDB6teTnHXtwJMsQRC4g9jdRJHWQACguutm a1HmjKA8+AV5Qj/mYknC29w= =XBqA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart282851258.fxjpszou9D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 03:31:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E6716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:31:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@wolf.com) Received: from houston.wolf.com (houston.wolf.com [216.40.226.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32D743D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:31:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@wolf.com) Received: (qmail 20098 invoked by uid 511); 7 Nov 2005 03:31:08 -0000 Message-ID: <20051107033108.20097.qmail@houston.wolf.com> From: "Daniel C. Mahoney" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:31:08 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 4.9-STABLE - need to mount USB hard drive, create partition, newfs, etc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:31:09 -0000 I've got a 4.9-STABLE system. I have a 250GB USB hard drive, and I'd like to create a UFS file system on it then mount it. It had an ext2 file system on it, but deleted it before taking it off the Linux box. I've tried working with disklabel and fdisk, but I don't seem to be understanding the man pages since I'm not getting anywhere. The system *is* seeing the drive as /dev/da0. Can anyone offer me directions on what I've got to do? -------------------------- Dan Mahoney dan@wolf.com "How you behave towards cats here below determines your status in Heaven." Robert Heinlein "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life - music and cats" - Albert Schweitzer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 03:41:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B9616A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:41:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adiakin@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AAE43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:41:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adiakin@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i32so251641wra for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:41:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=NEXJLrJ5qvmenv00VkVhjMNB5I5c/IOwXsa1O0a/L9opovebqJzqp0KJkmjjjp1fK1M4FQe2OdB5xffEnMO78JpE5TogSay0mBkrzewBaCf9TNkpdhQh9WhVPyAgCKUu1AikdrI/HFDpuYrqQc4/bh4DzeuweFOSVNwuA+mya2w= Received: by 10.54.111.14 with SMTP id j14mr3840517wrc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:41:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.141.1 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:41:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:41:50 +0000 From: Andrew Diakin To: FreeBSD Mail List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: PS/2 keyboard don't work in FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:41:51 -0000 Hi, I try ti install FreeBSD 6.0 Release but my Microsoft PS/2 keyboard don't work at all. At beta2 it work about 2 minutes... Has anybody the same trouble? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 03:44:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B8416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:44:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439EC43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:44:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: from reverse-213-146-114-24.cust.kamp-dsl.de [213.146.114.24] (helo=reverse-213-146-114-24.cust.kamp-dsl.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2Dk-1EYxvo120g-0004uT; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:44:28 +0100 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:49:33 +0100 (CET) From: "P.U.Kruppa" X-X-Sender: root@www.pukruppa.net To: "Daniel C. Mahoney" In-Reply-To: <20051107033108.20097.qmail@houston.wolf.com> Message-ID: <20051107044607.Y2634@www.pukruppa.net> References: <20051107033108.20097.qmail@houston.wolf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:2446dbdf8275641f979193ced594c629 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.9-STABLE - need to mount USB hard drive, create partition, newfs, etc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:44:30 -0000 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Daniel C. Mahoney wrote: > I've got a 4.9-STABLE system. I have a 250GB USB hard drive, and I'd like to > create a UFS file system on it then mount it. It had an ext2 file system on > it, but deleted it before taking it off the Linux box. > I've tried working with disklabel and fdisk, but I don't seem to be > understanding the man pages since I'm not getting anywhere. The system *is* > seeing the drive as /dev/da0. > Can anyone offer me directions on what I've got to do? Did you try # /stand/sysinstall This will give you the FreeBSD installation menu and you should be able to setup partitions and formatting. Good Luck, Uli. > -------------------------- > Dan Mahoney > dan@wolf.com > "How you behave towards cats here below determines your status in Heaven." > Robert Heinlein > "There are two means of refuge from the miseries of > life - music and cats" - Albert Schweitzer > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ********************************************* * Peter Ulrich Kruppa - Wuppertal - Germany * ********************************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 03:56:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B1816A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:56:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp2.linkline.com (smtp2.linkline.com [64.30.215.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F025843D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 03:56:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp2.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129FC169; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:56:28 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:56:30 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: Eric F Crist , Jeffrey Ellis Message-ID: Thread-Topic: More help with find Thread-Index: AcXjTzwXet3sKU9CEdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <942B5207-1535-414A-8F41-BEECD9D90375@secure-computing.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More help with find X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:56:33 -0000 Hi, Eric-- Thanks, yes. I've read through it several times, but unfortunately am finding it very difficult to both understand, or know how to use as far as the actual syntax would go. Hence the need for a bit of help :) All My Best, Jeffrey on 11/6/05 5:06 PM, Eric F Crist at ecrist@secure-computing.net wrote: > On Nov 6, 2005, at 6:58 PM, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > >> Hi, Rolland-- >> >> Ok. Stupid of me. >> >> Find -x /volumes/foo/* >> >> Seems to work fine. So I guess now I'm just left with the display and >> sorting questions. >> >> All My Best, >> Jeffrey > > Jeffrey, > > man find is your friend. Even though you're using Darwin, the man > pages are still there. Simply go to a terminal and type: > > # man find > > If there's a particular page you're looking for, such as page 5, type: > > # man 5 find > > In this particular instance, there is no section 5 for find. For > further help on using the man(ual), type: > > # man man > > HTH > ----- > Eric F Crist > Secure Computing Networks > http://www.secure-computing.net > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 04:09:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FF616A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:09:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (dsl081-142-072.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.142.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A83443D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:09:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p17.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.13.5/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA748xfD001049; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 22:09:00 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106220717.02634c18@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:08:52 -0600 To: Hans Nieser From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <436EB3DD.4050003@xs4all.nl> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20051106182349.025dd7c0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <436EAB84.5000504@xs4all.nl> <6.0.0.22.2.20051106193209.025ddee0@mail.computinginnovations.com> <436EB3DD.4050003@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 panics on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:09:16 -0000 At 07:54 PM 11/6/2005, Hans Nieser wrote: >Derek Ragona wrote: >>At 07:19 PM 11/6/2005, Hans Nieser wrote: >> >>>Derek Ragona wrote: >>> >>>>I have a computer that has been running FreeBSD 4.X and 5.X without >>>>problems. It runs 5.4 with no problems at all. This system has an >>>>Intel 845 Motherboard and chipset, Intel Pentium 4 1.6 GHz CPU, 1 GB >>>>RAM, NVidea GEForce MX/MX 400 video card, atapi CD-RW, IDE hard drive, >>>>standard floppy. Nothing very exotic in this hardware. >>>>I tried first to cvsup to 6.0, and rebuild everything. The build was >>>>fine including a custom kernel, but when I tried to boot the new 6.0, I >>>>got a panic, Fatal trap 12, page fault at the NVidea driver in the >>>>boot. So I re-booted the kernel.old, reverted my sources to 5.4 and >>>>rebuilt the system all again. >>>>As the system rebuilt I downloaded and burned the ISO 6.0 image. >>>>I tried to boot the ISO image and do a binary upgrade. The CD booted >>>>6.0 fine, and the upgrade installed with only one error that the X.org >>>>was already present. When I tried to boot the new 6.0 GENERIC kernel >>>>that was installed, I got the same panic/page fault error I had when I >>>>updated via cvsup. >>>>But since the same GENERIC kernel boots fine from CD I suspect there >>>>may be some loader options I might need? I'd appreciate any help with >>>>getting 6.0 to boot without the panic. >>>>Thanks >>> >>> >>>Hi Derek, >>> >>>You probably just have to stop the nvidia driver from loading by >>>specifying "unset nvidia_load" at the boot prompt and reinstall the >>>nvidia driver once the system is booted. >>> >>>That's what I did at least, and I have had no problems while I've heard >>>from other people that didn't disable and rebuilt their nvidia drivers >>>that they also got panics on boot. >>Hans, >>Let me see if I understand the process. When I go to boot 6.0, escape to >>the boot prompt, then type: >>unset nvidia_load >>Once the system boots then, how do I reinstall the nvidia driver? That >>last step has me confused. Would I rebuild the kernel again? Or >>something else? > >I (hopefully correctly) assumed you were using NVIDIA's own native drivers >for FreeBSD as a loadable module (from the x11/nvidia-driver port), if so, >then after booting without the nvidia module loaded, a "portupgrade -f >nvidia-driver" should do the trick (or pkg_delete nvidia-driver && cd >/usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver && make install clean). > >But just in case, this is how I upgraded my system; I deleted all the >ports/packages I had installed (since they have to be rebuilt for 6.0 >anyway) with "pkg_delete -a", cvsupped ports and the RELENG_6_0 sources, >rebuilt the kernel/world, commented out any third party modules (including >nvidia) in /boot/loader.conf, rebooted and installed all the packages >(including x11/nvidia-driver) I needed, and that's basically it. > Hans, I changed the line in loader.conf to NO, booted the CD, ran the upgrade, cvsup'd then reinstalled the nvidea driver from the port. It is working great. Thanks again for your help. -Derek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 04:19:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD6A16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:19:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9AF43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:19:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA74Jlhp008155 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:19:47 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jA74JjS7068019; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:19:45 +0700 (ICT) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:19:45 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200511070419.jA74JjS7068019@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: kirk@strauser.com In-reply-to: <200511041129.17912.kirk@strauser.com> (message from Kirk Strauser on Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:29:12 -0600) References: <200511040956.19087.kirk@strauser.com> <436B8ADF.4000703@mac.com> <200511041129.17912.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast diff command for large files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:19:57 -0000 > We do the mirroring by running a program that dumps the FoxPro > tables out as tab-delimited files. Thus far, we'd been using > PostgreSQL's "copy from" command to read those files into the > database. In reality, though, a very, very small percentage of > rows in those tables actually change. So, I wrote a program > that takes the output of diff and converts it into a series of I think the problem could be considered another way. if you have access to the "legacy/FoxPro" application, it should be modifed to add a timestamp to each reccord modification. Then you could only dump those reccords that were modified since the last change. That seems to me the only long term viable solution that could sizeup nicely with your set of data. Not to mention that once implemented it would be much much faster. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 05:00:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9195D16A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:00:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net (outbound05.telus.net [199.185.220.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7549743D5D for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:59:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from [10.0.10.6] (really [154.20.242.227]) by priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051107045955.WXED28547.priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net@[10.0.10.6]>; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:59:55 -0700 From: Dave Webster To: FreeBSD questions , "Michael C. Shultz" In-Reply-To: <200511061658.30611.ringworm01@gmail.com> References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <200511061658.30611.ringworm01@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:57:58 -0800 Message-Id: <1131339478.1078.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:00:01 -0000 Thanks for the response, I edited the /etc/rc.conf with the clear_tmp_enable="YES" rebooted reran pkg_add -r openoffice same error. On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 16:58 -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Sunday 06 November 2005 16:59, Dave Webster wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to: pkg_add -r openoffice and I get the following: > > > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > > mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > > pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', you're > > on your own! > > > > That last part is particularily chilling - if I'm on my own, I'm hooped! > > > > Here's the result of df -h: > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/ad0s1a 248M 93M 135M 41% / > > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > > /dev/ad0s1e 248M 294K 228M 0% /tmp > > /dev/ad0s1f 72G 25G 42G 37% /usr > > /dev/ad0s1d 248M 62M 166M 27% /var > > linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc > > > > Any suggestions on what I should do? > > thanx in advance, > > Dave > > In /etc/rc.conf set: > > clear_tmp_enable="NO" > > to > > clear_tmp_enable="YES" > > then reboot. > > -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 05:01:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADCA16A421 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:01:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crs.freebsd_mailinglist@users.nuaptools.com) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [217.160.230.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217CC43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:01:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crs.freebsd_mailinglist@users.nuaptools.com) Received: from cpe-069-132-090-051.carolina.res.rr.com [69.132.90.51] (helo=crskayak) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrelayus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKp2t-1EYz8Q1VCC-0002rb; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:01:34 -0500 Message-ID: <025b01c5e358$586f6610$b300a8c0@crskayak> From: "Clay" To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" References: <20051106120047.5EE4B16A422@hub.freebsd.org> <1131308616.746.21.camel@dell.sinux.seb> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:01:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Provags-ID: perfora.net abuse@perfora.net login:b1de210854115b00b7e9e85015d9a091 Subject: Re: 5.4 Generic Kernel - da and scbus...I'm at a loss X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Clay List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:01:37 -0000 Thanks for the response. Did you have a problem with "opt_usbverbose.h"? I replaced the existing "usb_subr.c" with the patched version and have not been able to successfully compile the new kernel using it seemly due to "opt_usbverbose.h" not being found. Thanks, -Clay . . . . . ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastien" To: Cc: Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 3:23 PM Subject: Re: 5.4 Generic Kernel - da and scbus...I'm at a loss > I am a newbie to kernel related things. I'm running 5.4 using the generic > kernel. I am problems with using an iPod via USB, and it seems that I may > not have device support for sa and scbus in my kernel. I have been > searching for a few hours this evening using various criteria and am still > unable to get past this issue. > > It seems like the failure is that a device node /dev/da* for the umass > drive > isn't be created. Any help would be appreciated. I am going to try > booting > the 6.0 kernel off CD next and then go from there. I had the same problem with a "nano". I had many difficulties to find a way to solve it too. Finally this link helped me http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2005-September/001534.html I patched /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usb_subr.c as described, compiled my kernel again and it works... I'm not sure that it's the right way but it works... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 05:16:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AD816A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:16:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF1A43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:16:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t14so332006wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:16:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=tWa6vSiLwFNEeNjIaNsg1u/oI84OoPdmZIDrorKUgKpcUjVhNHttGhO7LaknXCghnr4diK3WujGsg+pQdNEUSzU41bk5dN3odF5SLwFO8EEnRf8QDS4HnAK1v7ItdsWQ9MpLHqCxCTKBKW/K0Cu+Xpp/I6EgV6ZJRY5B+Ac8UOg= Received: by 10.70.44.3 with SMTP id r3mr4609183wxr; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:16:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h11sm25021wxd.2005.11.06.21.15.59; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:16:02 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Dave Webster Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:07:24 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <200511061658.30611.ringworm01@gmail.com> <1131339478.1078.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1131339478.1078.2.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511062107.25015.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:16:03 -0000 On Sunday 06 November 2005 20:57, Dave Webster wrote: > Thanks for the response, > I edited the /etc/rc.conf with the clear_tmp_enable="YES" > rebooted > reran pkg_add -r openoffice > same error. 248M 62M 166M 27% /var probably you don't have enough drive space on tmp, try linking /tmp to /usr/tmp, you have 42 gigs free there. On your machine try this mkdir /usr/tmp umount -f /tmp rm -r /tmp ln -sv /usr/tmp /tmp then reboot -Mike > > On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 16:58 -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Sunday 06 November 2005 16:59, Dave Webster wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I'm trying to: pkg_add -r openoffice and I get the following: > > > > > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > > > mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > > > pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', > > > you're on your own! > > > > > > That last part is particularily chilling - if I'm on my own, I'm > > > hooped! > > > > > > Here's the result of df -h: > > > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > > /dev/ad0s1a 248M 93M 135M 41% / > > > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > > > /dev/ad0s1e 248M 294K 228M 0% /tmp > > > /dev/ad0s1f 72G 25G 42G 37% /usr > > > /dev/ad0s1d 248M 62M 166M 27% /var > > > linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc > > > > > > Any suggestions on what I should do? > > > thanx in advance, > > > Dave > > > > In /etc/rc.conf set: > > > > clear_tmp_enable="NO" > > > > to > > > > clear_tmp_enable="YES" > > > > then reboot. > > > > -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 05:22:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBFA16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:22:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2781E43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:22:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so316577wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:22:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=qovjY/aORJ/bjvOhYQRwus05HLlf/6zRsWvggWqxpsYcaXhS6zHGcyFtc4hYAK/MCPsH9TfjzgBvH5AxuoBw+y1oZjpYcJLYdiWqTpoKlQPyCS6XZ4U+hYa8XZEhbbODngwfMDbfw3HRtEatcRUG1bOcM8CNk/zO7gsEZS4VIKM= Received: by 10.70.117.16 with SMTP id p16mr4636417wxc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h18sm731442wxd.2005.11.06.21.22.17; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 21:22:18 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Dave Webster Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:13:41 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <1131339478.1078.2.camel@localhost> <200511062107.25015.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200511062107.25015.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511062113.42397.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:22:19 -0000 On Sunday 06 November 2005 21:07, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Sunday 06 November 2005 20:57, Dave Webster wrote: > > Thanks for the response, > > I edited the /etc/rc.conf with the clear_tmp_enable="YES" > > rebooted > > reran pkg_add -r openoffice > > same error. > > 248M 62M 166M 27% /var > > probably you don't have enough drive space on tmp, try linking > /tmp to /usr/tmp, you have 42 gigs free there. On your machine > try this > > mkdir /usr/tmp > umount -f /tmp > rm -r /tmp > ln -sv /usr/tmp /tmp > > then reboot > > -Mike If its not too late, go into /etc/fstab and comment out the line that mounts /dev/ad0s1e to /tmp before you reboot sorry I forgot to mention that... > > > On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 16:58 -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > On Sunday 06 November 2005 16:59, Dave Webster wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to: pkg_add -r openoffice and I get the following: > > > > > > > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > > > > mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > > > > pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', > > > > you're on your own! > > > > > > > > That last part is particularily chilling - if I'm on my own, I'm > > > > hooped! > > > > > > > > Here's the result of df -h: > > > > > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > > > /dev/ad0s1a 248M 93M 135M 41% / > > > > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > > > > /dev/ad0s1e 248M 294K 228M 0% /tmp > > > > /dev/ad0s1f 72G 25G 42G 37% /usr > > > > /dev/ad0s1d 248M 62M 166M 27% /var > > > > linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc > > > > > > > > Any suggestions on what I should do? > > > > thanx in advance, > > > > Dave > > > > > > In /etc/rc.conf set: > > > > > > clear_tmp_enable="NO" > > > > > > to > > > > > > clear_tmp_enable="YES" > > > > > > then reboot. > > > > > > -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 05:48:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1082216A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:48:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A822543D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:48:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (pool-71-109-244-179.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.244.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA75mulr021084 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:48:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions From: Doug Hardie Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:48:55 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1165/Sat Nov 5 21:12:58 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Upgrade from 5.3 to 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:48:59 -0000 I am in the midst of upgrading via source from 5.3 to 6.0. All is going fine, but the instructions in UPDATING do not include a make installkernel command. I know that needs to be done somewhere. I suspect between the buildkernel and the reboot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 06:15:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BB816A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 06:15:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF2343D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 06:15:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (nieser.net [194.109.160.131]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA76Fahp093885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:15:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <436EF109.2010706@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:15:37 +0100 From: Hans Nieser User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Hardie References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade from 5.3 to 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:15:39 -0000 Doug Hardie wrote: > I am in the midst of upgrading via source from 5.3 to 6.0. All is > going fine, but the instructions in UPDATING do not include a make > installkernel command. I know that needs to be done somewhere. I > suspect between the buildkernel and the reboot. I think it says "make kernel ...", which apparently does both From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 06:36:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E668A16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 06:36:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prosa@pro.sk) Received: from ns.pro.sk (proxy.pro.sk [212.55.244.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D99743D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 06:36:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prosa@pro.sk) Received: from peter (Peter [192.168.1.53]) by ns.pro.sk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id jA76a5MI052162 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:36:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from prosa@pro.sk) Message-ID: <00fb01c5e365$7063adf0$3501a8c0@pro.sk> From: "Peter Rosa" To: "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:35:26 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (ns.pro.sk [192.168.1.1]); Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:36:05 +0100 (CET) Subject: sshd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:36:07 -0000 Zdravim vsetkych, prosim, ako sa mam zbavit hlasky v logoch: Failed none for xxx from 192.168.1.53 port 1291 ssh2 Hlaska sa objavi *vzdy*, ked sa pripojim k tomu pocitacu. Pritom mam prihlasovanie heslom vypnute. FreeBSD 4.11-p12. sshd_config (ocisteny o komentare): LogLevel VERBOSE PermitRootLogin no StrictModes yes RSAAuthentication yes PubkeyAuthentication yes AuthorizedKeysFile .ssh/authorized_keys RhostsAuthentication no IgnoreRhosts yes RhostsRSAAuthentication no HostbasedAuthentication no IgnoreUserKnownHosts no PasswordAuthentication no PermitEmptyPasswords no ChallengeResponseAuthentication no GatewayPorts no Subsystem sftp /usr/libexec/sftp-server Vdaka, Peter Rosa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 06:50:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736A816A41F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 06:50:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lupe@lupe-christoph.de) Received: from buexe.b-5.de (buexe.b-5.de [84.19.0.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E37B43D45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 06:50:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lupe@lupe-christoph.de) Received: from antalya.lupe-christoph.de (antalya.lupe-christoph.de [172.17.0.9]) by buexe.b-5.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/b-5/buexe-3.4) with ESMTP id jA76ojqi026138; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:50:46 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antalya.lupe-christoph.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A0E344A6; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:50:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from antalya.lupe-christoph.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (antalya [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18315-07-32; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:50:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by antalya.lupe-christoph.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 46409344D4; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:48:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:48:52 +0100 To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20051107064852.GA26203@lupe-christoph.de> Mail-Followup-To: "Simon L. Nielsen" , freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> <20051106204852.GB25399@ada.devbox.be> <20051106220942.GC904@zaphod.nitro.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051106220942.GC904@zaphod.nitro.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: lupe@lupe-christoph.de (Lupe Christoph) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lupe-christoph.de Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened with portaudit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:50:49 -0000 On Sunday, 2005-11-06 at 23:09:42 +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > It does seem to work for me now. Could people having this problem > please check the size of /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz and try to > run portaudit -Fa to refetch the database and check again? > For reference: > [simon@zaphod:/tmp] ls -l /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31762 6 Nov 22:40 /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz Same problem here, on all machines: ls -l /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5689 Nov 6 03:10 /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz portaudit -Fa auditfile.tbz 100% of 31 kB 32 kBps New database installed. 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found. ls -l /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31764 Nov 7 07:40 /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz Lupe Christoph -- | You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel, one nuclear | | weapon and a thing that has 270,000 moving parts built by the lowest | | bidder. Makes you feel good, doesn't it? | | Rockhound in "Armageddon", 1998, about the Space Shuttle | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 07:27:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DB516A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:27:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from self@ivansa.ru) Received: from cp21.agava.net (cp21.agava.net [81.176.65.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA54F43D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:27:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from self@ivansa.ru) Received: from drweb by cp21.agava.net with drweb-scanned (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1EZ1PX-000EWh-QC for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:27:23 +0300 Received: from cpanel by cp21.agava.net with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1EZ1PX-000EWb-MK for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:27:23 +0300 Received: from 81.176.65.207 ([81.176.65.207]) by panel21.agava.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:27:23 +0300 Message-ID: <1131348443.436f01db9e094@panel21.agava.net> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:27:23 +0300 From: "Ivan S. Anisimov" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 81.176.65.207 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp21.agava.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [426 426] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ivansa.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Subject: 5.2 x hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:27:26 -0000 Hello, I've recently upgraded from 5.0 to 5.2 (custom kernel with the only addition - device pcm) and encountered the following problem: x server hangs the whole system time after time on initialization or shutdown. x starts clearly once out of three-four times. video card is radeon 8500 (card is not listed, I pointed xf86cfg to use ati driver). some video modes (low resolution and bitrate) seem to be more stable, but all of those I tried cause a lock up. Previously installed 5.0 on the same machine worked perfectly. Could you please help solve this? Many thanks in advance, Ivan -- Ivan S. Anisimov cel. +7 (916) 134 72 33 email self@ivansa.ru www http://ivansa.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 07:29:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C089116A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:29:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (outbound04.telus.net [199.185.220.223]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDCE43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:29:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from [10.0.10.6] (really [154.20.242.227]) by priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051107072919.FENK4431.priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net@[10.0.10.6]>; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:29:19 -0700 From: Dave Webster To: FreeBSD questions , "Michael C. Shultz" In-Reply-To: <200511062113.42397.ringworm01@gmail.com> References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <1131339478.1078.2.camel@localhost> <200511062107.25015.ringworm01@gmail.com> <200511062113.42397.ringworm01@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:27:23 -0800 Message-Id: <1131348443.644.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:29:23 -0000 Tried the link and commented out the line in /etc/fstab, rebooted but still get the same problem. On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 21:13 -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Sunday 06 November 2005 21:07, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Sunday 06 November 2005 20:57, Dave Webster wrote: > > > Thanks for the response, > > > I edited the /etc/rc.conf with the clear_tmp_enable="YES" > > > rebooted > > > reran pkg_add -r openoffice > > > same error. > > > > 248M 62M 166M 27% /var > > > > probably you don't have enough drive space on tmp, try linking > > /tmp to /usr/tmp, you have 42 gigs free there. On your machine > > try this > > > > mkdir /usr/tmp > > umount -f /tmp > > rm -r /tmp > > ln -sv /usr/tmp /tmp > > > > then reboot > > > > -Mike > > If its not too late, go into > /etc/fstab and comment out the line that > mounts /dev/ad0s1e to /tmp > before you reboot > > sorry I forgot to mention that... > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 16:58 -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > On Sunday 06 November 2005 16:59, Dave Webster wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > I'm trying to: pkg_add -r openoffice and I get the following: > > > > > > > > > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > > > > > mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > > > > > pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', > > > > > you're on your own! > > > > > > > > > > That last part is particularily chilling - if I'm on my own, I'm > > > > > hooped! > > > > > > > > > > Here's the result of df -h: > > > > > > > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > > > > /dev/ad0s1a 248M 93M 135M 41% / > > > > > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > > > > > /dev/ad0s1e 248M 294K 228M 0% /tmp > > > > > /dev/ad0s1f 72G 25G 42G 37% /usr > > > > > /dev/ad0s1d 248M 62M 166M 27% /var > > > > > linprocfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /usr/compat/linux/proc > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestions on what I should do? > > > > > thanx in advance, > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > In /etc/rc.conf set: > > > > > > > > clear_tmp_enable="NO" > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > clear_tmp_enable="YES" > > > > > > > > then reboot. > > > > > > > > -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 07:31:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBE316A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:31:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EBA43D4C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:31:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so260130nzo for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:31:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ohScad+jYDwXn3rirQQnkcawZ2iYSUys/bIYo+2xTnvpedZqk3mGkhn04IB6OT21TP4jFGm5GlTJQWcJS5iTLHTe7wTpQ/e+i+gMxRasHZpdtCS1QEMCOuHinEQ5uLEyzLC5WI51TbhEazCoXk8hPTJ3e24h0pgcD+RWCq7grHw= Received: by 10.36.24.20 with SMTP id 20mr201028nzx; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:31:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:31:33 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl In-Reply-To: <20051107004922.GA67001@Alex.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <001601c5e179$eca0c9e0$6601a8c0@rick84b7807dcb> <436CFE25.4060005@ec.rr.com> <436E0F21.9070402@mail.ru> <20051107004922.GA67001@Alex.lan> Cc: Antoine Solomon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GAMING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:31:37 -0000 On 11/7/05, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:39:53PM +0000, Antoine Solomon wrote: > > On 11/6/05, Andrew P. wrote: > > > > > > On 11/6/05, Stepan Rakhimov wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yesterday, I spent 4 hours playing UT2004. And it > > > > > seemed to run faster than on Windows. At least it > > > > > felt much cooler :-) > > > > > > > > Please give me a link to UT2004 howto. i tried to find it but witho= ut > > > > success. > > > > > > Hey is there any port of the full game? > > Dear Stepan, > > Am I wride in that you don't know much about the FreeBSD ports system? > Its a system where someone else has insured that the installation of a > thirth party software goes smoothly. > > This is how you can find ports and install them > cd /usr/ports > make search name=3DUT2004 (use 'key' if you don't know the name) > > This gives me: > Port: linux-ut2004-demo-3334 > Path: /usr/ports/games/linux-ut2004-demo > Info: Unreal Tournament 2004 demo > Maint: jylefort@FreeBSD.org > B-deps: > R-deps: linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_3 linux-expat-1.95.5_3 > linux-fontconfig-2.2.3 linux_base-8-8.0_7 linux_dri-4.4.0 > WWW: http://www.unrealtournament.com/ut2004/ > > cd /usr/ports/games/linux-ut2004-demo > make clean && make install && make clean > > Now its installed. > > -- > Alex > > Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply. > > Howto's based on my ppersonal use, including information about > setting up a firewall and creating traffic graphs with MRTG > http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ > > Somebody seems to should have slept more, doesn't he? :-) As it is obvious from the port's name, games/linux-ut2004-demo is not a full game, but only a demo. Thanks for your insight, anyway. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 07:37:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2676816A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from mra03.ch.as12513.net (mra03.ch.as12513.net [82.153.252.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A545243D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:37:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mra03.ch.as12513.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B231ED4447; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:37:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mra03.ch.as12513.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mra03.ch.as12513.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19113-02-45; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:37:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kryten.xk7.net (unknown [81.168.90.101]) by mra03.ch.as12513.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C834D43EF; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:37:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: by kryten.xk7.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 398021703E; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:35:12 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:35:12 +0000 From: Paul Waring To: Eric F Crist Message-ID: <20051107073512.GA10604@kryten.xk7.net> References: <36f5bbba0511061138k4f9b5ef5q2fefed621c9ffc6b@mail.gmail.com> <436E60FC.5050009@makeworld.com> <20051106204732.GB755@kryten.xk7.net> <436E8682.5030306@makeworld.com> <20051106224550.GA3718@kryten.xk7.net> <0358753F-3003-4A76-AC33-FB5BFBA2AEFE@secure-computing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0358753F-3003-4A76-AC33-FB5BFBA2AEFE@secure-computing.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Edwin D. Vinas" Subject: Re: how to setup DNS server and making sub-domains in DSL server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:37:35 -0000 On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 06:22:58PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote: > Actually, my ISP, ipHouse.net is one who's willing to configure > reverse DNS for you. Qwest Communications is another one who'll > setup DNS for you, and they're HUGE. If you choose to go with > ipHouse, tell them I sent you -- then I get free DSL for a month! If you read my post, you'll see I said "at least not in the UK". Neither Qwest nor ipHouse have operations outside the USA as far as I can tell. Paul -- Rogue Tory http://www.roguetory.org.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 07:44:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8021716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:44:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmy@inet-solutions.be) Received: from mail.ihosting.be (vero.ihosting.be [83.217.81.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4ED8043D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jimmy@inet-solutions.be) Received: (qmail 10575 invoked by uid 1033); 7 Nov 2005 07:47:03 -0000 Received: from jimmy@inet-solutions.be by excalibur.hyprotech.be by uid 1016 with qmail-scanner-1.20st (clamscan: 0.75. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.010222 secs); 07 Nov 2005 07:47:03 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO vero.ihosting.be) (127.0.0.1) by mail.ihosting.be with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 07:47:03 -0000 Received: (from jimmy@inet-solutions.be) by vero.ihosting.be (mini_sendmail/1.3.5 16nov2003); Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:47:03 CET (sender jimmy@inet-solutions.be by using webserver vero.ihosting.be path /www/ihosting/horde.ihosting.be/imp - report abuse to abuse@boxke.be) Received: from 194.78.143.3 ([194.78.143.3]) by webmail.boxke.be (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:47:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1131349623.436f06779cbc1@webmail.boxke.be> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:47:03 +0100 From: jimmy@inet-solutions.be To: "Simon L. Nielsen" References: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> <20051106204852.GB25399@ada.devbox.be> <20051106220942.GC904@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20051106220942.GC904@zaphod.nitro.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 194.78.143.3 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-1?b?S/Z2ZXNk4W4g?= =?iso-8859-1?b?R+Fib3I=?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened with portaudit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:44:07 -0000 Quoting "Simon L. Nielsen" : > On 2005.11.06 21:48:52 +0100, Jimmy Scott wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:30:00PM +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4, > > > ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security > > > run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the > > > affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but > > > now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three > > > packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody suspect what's wrong? > > > > I noticed the same, but didn't had the time to look for a possible > > answer on that question. > > It does seem to work for me now. Could people having this problem > please check the size of /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz and try to > run portaudit -Fa to refetch the database and check again? > > For reference: > > [simon@zaphod:/tmp] ls -l /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31762 6 Nov 22:40 /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz > > There have been one previous report where a problem with the portaudit > database build resulted in an incomplete auditfile which was then > fixed after the next portaudit database rebuild. > > -- > Simon L. Nielsen > FreeBSD Security Team > Everything seems fine today, I can't check the size of the file from then since it's being run every night by periodic/security. If you are really interrested in the file I could restore it from a backup somehow, but it will be a lot of work. I should have checked it from the moment I noticed in the emails. Kind regards, Jimmy Scott ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message has been sent through ihosting.be To report spamming or other unaccepted behavior by a iHosting customer, please send a message to abuse@ihosting.be ---------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 07:45:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B10A16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:45:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E75843D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:45:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (pool-71-109-244-179.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.244.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA77ixT8022774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:45:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <436EF109.2010706@xs4all.nl> References: <436EF109.2010706@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <245F198F-4E74-48F4-9DC2-550B7AFEAA3E@lafn.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Hardie Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:44:57 -0800 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1165/Sat Nov 5 21:12:58 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrade from 5.3 to 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:45:01 -0000 On Nov 6, 2005, at 22:15, Hans Nieser wrote: > Doug Hardie wrote: >> I am in the midst of upgrading via source from 5.3 to 6.0. All >> is going fine, but the instructions in UPDATING do not include a >> make installkernel command. I know that needs to be done >> somewhere. I suspect between the buildkernel and the reboot. > > I think it says "make kernel ...", which apparently does both I see that now. But, then how do you build multiple kernels? I maintain all source on one system and build all the kernels there. I don't want to install them as they won't work. Also, I don't want to build them on the production machines, just install them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 07:45:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94D516A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:45:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3706743D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:45:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t13so325541wxc for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:45:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=J+rhY69rcmgGPy+xu18v2rUye5sr3YhssaxvwwCglf39Ja6GJORHEaY3hZBozShMX7K1CNWT+zFrEdMooKrdDFVtz0sA9eCke9MOAZ6GWHkiwI0SY8uf0JlX5BJgIw2dItItsbI6QBs86CengG6wZf6aV5Xd/xxnGNxBiTzHUeU= Received: by 10.70.28.19 with SMTP id b19mr4711588wxb; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:38:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h18sm813890wxd.2005.11.06.23.38.33; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:38:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Dave Webster Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:29:47 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <200511062113.42397.ringworm01@gmail.com> <1131348443.644.1.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1131348443.644.1.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511062329.47970.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:45:05 -0000 On Sunday 06 November 2005 23:27, Dave Webster wrote: > Tried the link and commented out the line in /etc/fstab, rebooted but > still get the same problem. You still get this? VVVVVVVVV /var: write failed, filesystem is full > > > > > > mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > > > > > > pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', > > > > > > you're on your own! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 08:10:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D3716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:10:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3D643D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (nieser.net [194.109.160.131]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA78AGDV066767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:10:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <436F0BE8.5080309@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:10:16 +0100 From: Hans Nieser User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Hardie References: <436EF109.2010706@xs4all.nl> <245F198F-4E74-48F4-9DC2-550B7AFEAA3E@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <245F198F-4E74-48F4-9DC2-550B7AFEAA3E@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade from 5.3 to 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:10:19 -0000 Doug Hardie wrote: > On Nov 6, 2005, at 22:15, Hans Nieser wrote: >> Doug Hardie wrote: >>> I am in the midst of upgrading via source from 5.3 to 6.0. All is >>> going fine, but the instructions in UPDATING do not include a make >>> installkernel command. I know that needs to be done somewhere. I >>> suspect between the buildkernel and the reboot. >> I think it says "make kernel ...", which apparently does both > I see that now. But, then how do you build multiple kernels? I > maintain all source on one system and build all the kernels there. I > don't want to install them as they won't work. Also, I don't want to > build them on the production machines, just install them. I think you can still use the buildkernel and installkernel targets for that purpose, they are still mentioned in the Makefile at least. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 08:19:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B04C16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:19:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fatorro@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16B043D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:19:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fatorro@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so264800nzo for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:19:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=lyAg2vxcWWwfvrtwNK2OMFi2XPMyv2Wj3YKzRl5V+DpNfjNvkfbCbjHuXgaxW23mHYwcGkapPvp8x0d9Pq3OjX2jZijQYuNKi/KYvLY7mgcln+gbTCu64GXgDSfRaVSR1TEPFJsd0anR2VQSWtb4jTFF5V16MtbkodaIeiv4B0M= Received: by 10.36.67.8 with SMTP id p8mr347974nza; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:19:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.139.13 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:19:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:19:24 +0100 From: Fatman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Antivir for mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:19:25 -0000 I'm doubting about to install CLAM or DR.WEB antivir in the mail server. What do you advise to me? thnkx. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 08:54:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72FC16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:54:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tolid@plab.ku.dk) Received: from plab.ku.dk (plab.ku.dk [130.225.107.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592BF43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:54:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tolid@plab.ku.dk) Received: from plab.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plab.ku.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F92256246B; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:54:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from antispam.localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plab.ku.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DDD8562468; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:54:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from [130.225.107.63] (eagle.plab.ku.dk [130.225.107.63]) by plab.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4726D562467; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:54:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <436F163E.3030708@plab.ku.dk> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:54:22 +0100 From: Anatoliy Dmytriyev Organization: The Protein Laboratory User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fatman References: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release X-Spamtest-Info: Pass through Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Antivir for mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:54:24 -0000 Kaspersky Fatman wrote: >I'm doubting about to install CLAM or DR.WEB antivir in the mail server. > >What do you advise to me? > >thnkx. > > > --- Anatoliy Dmytriyev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 08:59:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3AB16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D588243D55 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:59:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id jA78ximU011654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:59:44 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-18-246-211.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [24.18.246.211]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id jA78xhRp029134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:59:44 -0800 Message-ID: <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:59:37 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051020 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:59:45 -0000 Micah wrote: > Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Nov 6, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Micah wrote: >> >>> Skylar Thompson wrote: >>> >>>> Micah wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was >>>>> upgrading Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It >>>>> looks like sometime around 11:30pm the computer reset. This >>>>> morning I'm trying to reinstall all the software that got lost in >>>>> last night's reset and I get another reset in the middle of >>>>> compiling. The last message in /var/log/messages before reboot is: >>>>> Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 >>>>> Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 >>>>> Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/ >>>>> kernel >>>>> >>>>> I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing >>>>> it's a hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? >>>> >>>> >>>> Could it be a bad power supply? Try swapping in another one and >>>> see what happens. >>> >>> >>> >>> I was thinking that too, unfortunately I don't have a spare and was >>> hoping to diagnose before buying parts. Voltages look fine when I >>> check the accessory lines (+5 and +12) with a multimeter under load. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Micah >> >> >> >> It might not just be a bad power supply, but instead a lack of >> power due to the power supply rating. So my question is, what is the >> rating of the power supply and how many devices (hard drives, ATX >> powered video cards) do you have connected? >> -Garrett > > > It had been working fine since I bought it at the beginning of > September. It's a 350 watt PSU running an Asus A8V-E deluxe mobo with > an Athlon 64 3000+. I have one ata 100 hd, one DVD-RW, and one > floppy. For expansion cards I have a PCI-EX vid card (MSI X300se), > and an Intel NIC. Plus the keyboard and two mice and that pretty much > accounts for all power drainers. > > Right now under load the multimeter reads 11.89 on +12, 5.12-5.08 on > +5 (did a min/max reading over several minutes on that one) and 3.36 > on +3. > > Thanks, > Micah Doesn't really sound like a lot, but depending on the amount of memory, I wonder since the power rating is _somewhat low_ and depending on which area of the world you live in, the amount of current output may be higher or lower, based on voltage values output by your power supply... Also, is your version of FreeBSD also running in 64 bit mode or 32 bit mode? -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 09:45:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6477016A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:45:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED2F43D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:44:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA79itsw020710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:44:55 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jA79ioaF071736; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:44:50 +0700 (ICT) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:44:50 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200511070944.jA79ioaF071736@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: fatorro@gmail.com In-reply-to: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> (message from Fatman on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:19:24 +0100) References: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Antivir for mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:45:01 -0000 >I'm doubting about to install CLAM or DR.WEB antivir in the mail server. Install both :) Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 10:24:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF9516A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:24:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F4843D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:24:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA7AOBYM022171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:24:11 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jA7AOAKl071986; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:24:10 +0700 (ICT) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:24:10 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200511071024.jA7AOAKl071986@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: Slow file transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:24:16 -0000 Hello, I am suffering from slow file transfer on a FreeBSD machine. The set-up is as follow: Router1 is connected to Router2 that is connected to sFTP server Router1 and Router2 are the same motherboard, same BIOS configuration, same CPU, both have same type hard disk (Seagate ATA 10 and 20 GB) and both are running the same version of freeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p16 with the same softwares (Zebra and xorp basically). Router2 has 128MB ram while Router1 has only 64MB. Both machine load are close to 0.00 When I do a file transfer from Router1 to sFTP server (through Router2) I get a transfer rate of 511 KB/s. When I do a file transfer from Router2 to sFTP server (one less hop) I can only get 87 KB/s. The transfer rates remains the same all along the day (this is not due at a specific traffic high load at the time I gathered data). While the setup has not changed for months, the slowness is very recent. I must admitthat I am clueless about what could be the reason and help would be greatly appreciated. TIA, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 11:10:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3AE16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:10:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AA243D5C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.253.228] ([82.41.253.228]) by smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:11:46 +0000 Message-ID: <436F363D.6060404@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:10:53 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Micah References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <200511061724.53128.akbeech@gmail.com> <436EBF38.6000309@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <436EBF38.6000309@ywave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2005 11:11:46.0764 (UTC) FILETIME=[0AE518C0:01C5E38C] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:10:58 -0000 Micah wrote: > Except it reboot later when rebuilding the KDE stuff with portinstall > NOT the Gnome script. And I'm getting occasional segmentation faults > on Thunderbird and intermittent compiler errors like this one while > portinstalling kdepim: > then mv -f ".deps/eudora_xxport.Tpo" ".deps/eudora_xxport.Plo"; else > rm -f ".deps/eudora_xxport.Tpo"; exit 1; fi > eudora_xxport.cpp: In member function `virtual KABC::AddresseeList > EudoraXXPort::importContacts(const QString&) const': > eudora_xxport.cpp:121: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. > While I agree with the previous poster that the upgrade script is a pig (why does it silently update ports which have *nothing* to do with gnome?) that is not you problem. The script may take all day, or all week, to finish, but it *should* finish. You have a *hardware* problem. Random segfaults are a classic bad memory symptom. Whether you have a memory stick that is going permanently, or getting too hot, or not getting enough voltage under load I cannot say, but but one of them or something like it is happening. > Something seems wrong. I don't think a software error should cause a > system reboot without any log messages anywhere. With a memory fault (or any other hardware fault) all bets are off. Think about it. If the program and data that you are supposed to be running become corrupted, how on earth can the kernel guarantee to write something to a log file? It was doing exactly what it was supposed to do and then it got fed garbage. Garbage in, garbage out - that's been true since forever and isn't going to change. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 12:11:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3919A16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:11:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asolomon15@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A851D43D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:11:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asolomon15@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so370690wxc for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:11:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NR1NqhLQHEOAbEiqvqr+cxD+/UaA4UivnH92PVHaEQGyG7mE7VHmFW7+TVr24kzxjB75K1p9Sua17Th7MAIBaTe2qefTlyINvOZNNBtv/F1V44NTvD1zrE/cBWBSlGcxsfmA4nC/aDrRUMFXv4iZstGHpGvP1Yi6esvIeBQGP8M= Received: by 10.70.67.19 with SMTP id p19mr2016599wxa; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:11:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.89.5 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:11:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:11:28 -0500 From: Antoine Solomon To: "Andrew P." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <001601c5e179$eca0c9e0$6601a8c0@rick84b7807dcb> <436CFE25.4060005@ec.rr.com> <436E0F21.9070402@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: GAMING X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:11:30 -0000 I Remember I was on 5.3 and installed ut2004 successfully from dvd. worked and ran extremely fast. There was some howto on the web for doing it but I can't find it on google anymore. On 11/6/05, Andrew P. wrote: > > On 11/6/05, Antoine Solomon wrote: > > Hey is there any port of the full game? > > > > Not in the ports tree and not that I know of. I'm sure it's not > a problem to run it. Copy protection will be an obstacle, but > if you own the game you'll be fully justified in searching for > a crack and cracking it. > -- Antoine W. Solomon Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 12:28:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180E316A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:28:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A352543D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:28:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m22so287054nzf for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:28:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=giaZx4C4sig9OP3y6911R0585XFv3iQx+K/VQkWehWh/K88g4W5rhmI92RWzK2CQeJGBK4+oNyOUBE+rFeF3/nxdQM7kMdi/bAlz8C45w3Bg3xiqUVhJwSGLevWWrSqY9gXKsiXexEHmS894xQWYdxkslbcOUz8h4eVqPZJLHuo= Received: by 10.37.15.59 with SMTP id s59mr424792nzi; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:28:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 04:28:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:28:20 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <245F198F-4E74-48F4-9DC2-550B7AFEAA3E@lafn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <436EF109.2010706@xs4all.nl> <245F198F-4E74-48F4-9DC2-550B7AFEAA3E@lafn.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade from 5.3 to 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:28:23 -0000 On 11/7/05, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2005, at 22:15, Hans Nieser wrote: > > > Doug Hardie wrote: > >> I am in the midst of upgrading via source from 5.3 to 6.0. All > >> is going fine, but the instructions in UPDATING do not include a > >> make installkernel command. I know that needs to be done > >> somewhere. I suspect between the buildkernel and the reboot. > > > > I think it says "make kernel ...", which apparently does both > > I see that now. But, then how do you build multiple kernels? I > maintain all source on one system and build all the kernels there. I > don't want to install them as they won't work. Also, I don't want to > build them on the production machines, just install them. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Put this into /etc/make.conf: KERNCONF=3D ... make kernel will build all kernels and install the first one. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 12:37:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF4216A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:37:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from P.Karasek@seznam.cz) Received: from mx1.seznam.cz (mx1.seznam.cz [212.80.76.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E968643D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:37:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from P.Karasek@seznam.cz) Received: (qmail 6294 invoked by uid 0); 7 Nov 2005 12:37:49 -0000 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:37:46 +0100 (CET) From: =?us-ascii?Q?Petr=20Karasek?= Received: from [217.77.161.17] by solar.go.seznam.cz with HTTP for P.Karasek@seznam.cz; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:37:45 +0100 (CET) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <2058.3169-22499-172463438-1131367066@seznam.cz> X-Abuse: helpdesk@seznam.cz X-Seznam-User: P.Karasek@seznam.cz Cc: Subject: FreeBSD platform for "AMD Sempron 64 2600 (socket 754, Palermo) Box" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:37:51 -0000 Dear ..., I would like to ask you to which platform belong this processor "AMD Sempron 64 2600 (socket 754, Palermo) Box" ? Is this the FreeBSD/amd64 Platform or FreeBSD/i386 Platform ??? So which installation should I use when I own a computer with this processor ? Thanks you very much Petr PS: Sorry, I cannot find it in documentation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 12:59:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C5916A421 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:59:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from mail16.bluewin.ch (mail16.bluewin.ch [195.186.19.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814B243D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:59:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from twelvegates.homeip.net (81.63.127.70) by mail16.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.2.068.1) id 435E00130034AABE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:59:18 +0000 Received: from goofy.here (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by twelvegates.homeip.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA7CxF6h014946 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:59:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: (from idefix@localhost) by goofy.here (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jA7CxF4l014945 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:59:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) X-Authentication-Warning: goofy.here: idefix set sender to hampi@rootshell.be using -f Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:59:14 +0100 From: Hanspeter Roth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051107125914.GA14923@twelvegates.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: hpijs drivers in cups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:59:20 -0000 Hello, I have Cups installed and the HPIJS driver package. But when selecting the Model/Driver in Cups the drivers of HPIJS are not available. What else is required? How are they made available in Cups? -Hanspeter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 13:21:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE62416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:21:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jim.Gorski@xerox.com) Received: from wbmler2.mail.xerox.com (wbmler2.mail.xerox.com [13.13.138.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B693043D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:21:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jim.Gorski@xerox.com) Received: from wbmlir2.mail.xerox.com (wbmlir2.mail.xerox.com [13.131.8.222]) by wbmler2.mail.xerox.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA7DL286022254 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:21:03 -0500 Received: from wbmlir2.mail.xerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wbmlir2.mail.xerox.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA7DKVHI006388 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:20:31 -0500 Received: from usa0300gw02.na.xerox.net (usa0300gw02.na.xerox.net [13.129.0.42]) by wbmlir2.mail.xerox.com (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA7DKGmX006178 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:20:31 -0500 Received: from usa0300ms01.na.xerox.net ([13.135.34.10]) by usa0300gw02.na.xerox.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:20:17 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:20:16 -0500 Message-ID: <309AD90BD8FC7E4383DB1ACCBF6C8DC00173AAB9@usa0300ms01.na.xerox.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load Thread-Index: AcXjk4A20X4ctlIkR9G8vvzfHwjOlwACf6rA From: "Gorski, Jim" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2005 13:20:17.0057 (UTC) FILETIME=[FE967110:01C5E39D] Subject: Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:21:05 -0000 Micah, I had a motherboard fail with a similar set of symptoms. Mine was due to bad capacitors on the motherboard itself. Take a look and make certain that none of them are swollen or pushing material out the top. Heat also leads to random resets - is your fan still running smoothly or is it covered in dust and cat hair like mine..? Best of luck - hope this helps, Jim Gorski Message: 14 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:59:37 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 >>>> Micah wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was=20 >>>>> upgrading Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It=20 >>>>> looks like sometime around 11:30pm the computer reset. This=20 >>>>> morning I'm trying to reinstall all the software that got lost in=20 >>>>> last night's reset and I get another reset in the middle of=20 >>>>> compiling. The last message in /var/log/messages before reboot is: >>>>> Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 >>>>> Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 >>>>> Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/ >>>>> kernel >>>>> >>>>> I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing=20 >>>>> it's a hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? >>>> >>>> >>>> Could it be a bad power supply? Try swapping in another one and=20 >>>> see what happens. >>> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 13:22:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39A716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:22:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from syjef@mdanderson.org) Received: from mail.mdanderson.org (mail.mdanderson.org [143.111.251.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAC243D69 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:22:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from syjef@mdanderson.org) Received: from jef-nt.mdacc.tmc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jef-nt.mdacc.tmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA7DLRGX058038; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:21:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from syjef@mdanderson.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by jef-nt.mdacc.tmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.11/Submit) id jA7DLQOx058037; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:21:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from syjef@mdanderson.org) X-Authentication-Warning: jef-nt.mdacc.tmc.edu: syjef set sender to syjef@mdanderson.org using -f From: Jonathan Fosburgh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:21:26 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <436E2F07.5010909@arcor.de> <20051106194658.GA22038@dmw.hopto.org> <436E6D79.4040909@arcor.de> In-Reply-To: <436E6D79.4040909@arcor.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511070721.26417.syjef@mdanderson.org> Cc: Moritz Lipfert Subject: Re: USB mice don't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:22:10 -0000 On Sunday 06 November 2005 02:54 pm, Moritz Lipfert wrote: > > At the moment there are no moused lines in my rc.conf. Should I add > these configuration lines? The usbd daemon should take care of it, but you might try putting it in rc.conf. Also, you may wish to try applying one of the patches (hid.patch.c) in usb/77604. Maybe someone will eventually commit these or atleast explain why they can't be... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 13:30:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347A716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:30:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE93E43D58 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:30:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1F1CD919D for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:30:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:30:39 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: TMYj3mdV6ZRuUtmhEmjOs9+9PoVCnomLtQqKdGohSssb 1131370238 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-201-210.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.201.210]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43FB5703B5 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:30:38 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:29:26 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <2058.3169-22499-172463438-1131367066@seznam.cz> In-Reply-To: <2058.3169-22499-172463438-1131367066@seznam.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511071329.28812.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD platform for "AMD Sempron 64 2600 (socket 754, Palermo) Box" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:30:43 -0000 On Monday 07 November 2005 12:37, Petr Karasek wrote: > Dear ..., > I would like to ask you > to which platform belong this processor "AMD Sempron 64 2600 (socket 754, > Palermo) Box" ? > > Is this the > FreeBSD/amd64 Platform > or > FreeBSD/i386 Platform Any Sempron will run as i386 Some socket 754 semprons are a form of amd64 with less cache and the 64-bit mode disabled, but since it's designated as "AMD Sempron 64", I guess this isn't one of them, so it should be able to run amd64 as well. Some software will run quicker on amd64, but some ports don't yet work on it, for example wine and the Nvidia driver (for 3d-support). I use i386 myself. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 14:31:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D004A16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:31:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE1843D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:31:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 21516 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 14:31:16 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2005 14:31:16 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7E88628441; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:31:15 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Arseny Solokha ,b0ntrict0r@yahoo.com To: questions@FreeBSD.org References: <961184002.20051105214032@yandex.ru> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Nov 2005 09:31:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <961184002.20051105214032@yandex.ru> Message-ID: <44acgg34y4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: Question about FreeBSD Handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:31:17 -0000 Arseny Solokha writes: > I'v partially read FreeBSD Handbook. To my mind this documentation > had been wrote most about releases 4 and 5 newest than 5.2.1. The intention is to keep everything up to date, while keeping it relevant to any release from (at least) the last two or three years. 5.2.1 was an "early adopters" release (http://be-well.ilk.org/FreeBSD/releases/5.2.1R/early-adopter.html), so it is intentionally not documented as carefully as releases that were intended for general use. > In > beginning of the documentation, in chapter 2.3.2 you wrote about > Kernel Configuration. How to start Kernel Configuration in release > 5.2.1? Should I edit kernel configuration file and rebuild a kernel? > By this way, I have troubles while I rebuild a kernel! 'Make' > returns errors while kernel linking was started. Go back to the GENERIC kernel and make a few changes at a time, so that you will be easily able to figure out which change was the problem. Or just stay with the GENERIC kernel, if it works fine for you. > I should attach my > kernel configuration file but BSD works on virtual machine and I > need to copy this file on a USB flash but I don't know how to > connect it to BSD. There is a FAQ entry on that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 14:32:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA99416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:32:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9D743D5C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:32:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 27902 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 14:32:32 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2005 14:32:32 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id F076528441; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:32:31 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Dave To: References: <004901c5e237$69776c40$0900a8c0@satellite> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Nov 2005 09:32:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <004901c5e237$69776c40$0900a8c0@satellite> Message-ID: <4464r434w0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: abcde ripping to mp3 and ogg using different folders X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:32:34 -0000 "Dave" writes: > Got a question. I've got some cd's i'd like to take and make mp3's out > of them. I've defined lame opts in my abcde.conf and i'd also like to > rip .ogg files at the same time. Doing this i'd like to store the mp3 > version of the disk and the .ogg version in separate folders under one > root area. Has anyone done this? I don't use abcde, but it seems like something that should be trivial to do with a script wrapper around abcde... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 14:35:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D2416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:35:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD5443D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:35:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 4642 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 14:35:14 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2005 14:35:14 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id BC45A28444; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:35:13 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Charlie McElfresh References: <20051106211756.78895.qmail@web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Nov 2005 09:35:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051106211756.78895.qmail@web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <441x1s34ri.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't install php5-dba port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:35:15 -0000 Charlie McElfresh writes: > I'm running php 5.05, apache 2.053, on FreeBSD > 5.4-RELEASE. > > When I try to install the port (from the ports > collection) > > php5-dba > > I get this message: > > ===> php5-dba-5.0.3_2 is marked as broken: Doesn't > work with PHP version : 4 (Doesn't support PHP 4). > > Help appreciated. It doesn't seem to be marked broken in the current version of the port... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 14:57:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3779E16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:57:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5F1343D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:57:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 21532 invoked by uid 502); 7 Nov 2005 14:57:36 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 14:57:36 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:57:35 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:57:38 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > Micah wrote: > > >>Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> >>>On Nov 6, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Micah wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Skylar Thompson wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Micah wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was >>>>>>upgrading Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It >>>>>>looks like sometime around 11:30pm the computer reset. This >>>>>>morning I'm trying to reinstall all the software that got lost in >>>>>>last night's reset and I get another reset in the middle of >>>>>>compiling. The last message in /var/log/messages before reboot is: >>>>>>Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 >>>>>>Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 >>>>>>Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/ >>>>>>kernel >>>>>> >>>>>>I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing >>>>>>it's a hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Could it be a bad power supply? Try swapping in another one and >>>>>see what happens. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>I was thinking that too, unfortunately I don't have a spare and was >>>>hoping to diagnose before buying parts. Voltages look fine when I >>>>check the accessory lines (+5 and +12) with a multimeter under load. >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Micah >>> >>> >>> >>> It might not just be a bad power supply, but instead a lack of >>>power due to the power supply rating. So my question is, what is the >>>rating of the power supply and how many devices (hard drives, ATX >>>powered video cards) do you have connected? >>>-Garrett >> >> >>It had been working fine since I bought it at the beginning of >>September. It's a 350 watt PSU running an Asus A8V-E deluxe mobo with >>an Athlon 64 3000+. I have one ata 100 hd, one DVD-RW, and one >>floppy. For expansion cards I have a PCI-EX vid card (MSI X300se), >>and an Intel NIC. Plus the keyboard and two mice and that pretty much >>accounts for all power drainers. >> >>Right now under load the multimeter reads 11.89 on +12, 5.12-5.08 on >>+5 (did a min/max reading over several minutes on that one) and 3.36 >>on +3. >> >>Thanks, >>Micah > > > Doesn't really sound like a lot, but depending on the amount of > memory, I wonder since the power rating is _somewhat low_ and depending > on which area of the world you live in, the amount of current output may > be higher or lower, based on voltage values output by your power > supply... Also, is your version of FreeBSD also running in 64 bit mode > or 32 bit mode? > -Garrett I'm running the i386 version of FreeBSD with 1gb ram. Didn't think to check this before, but I'm getting ~112-113 volts into the PSU from the surge strip. I'm probably going to get a new PSU today. The parts store has a couple of 400 watters in the $50 range (a fortron and a thermaltake). I did a lucifer burn-in test last night and got 8 errors over a two hour period. I ran the mprime torture test this morning (after the computer had been powered off overnight) and it passed. I didn't have the high-low meter attached to see how the voltages looked. Thanks, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 14:58:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D6916A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:58:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pkands@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFA843D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:58:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pkands@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i11so716841wra for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:58:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i8RmCpazUZ6iMx8ODsCajcWOpGMj9nCdDi7nh2WPa6GBc5A5WbnT4jS1jX5wBi+R5wbE1eqFSEsz4wFeqx2qlQ6fCUNruf/lU0PCdxljihS3oETQrj6tL1P20gc2/xPmoZZt6BLV1UBoDzWaay0nKyBMULmR1yRQK1y1f7TQgcM= Received: by 10.65.215.5 with SMTP id s5mr5329376qbq; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:58:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?206.148.12.146? ( [206.148.12.146]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id d12sm4058078qbc.2005.11.07.06.58.04; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:58:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <436F6B80.6010709@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:58:08 -0500 From: John Cox User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: boot manager linux/bsd dual boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:58:06 -0000 I am preparing for a freeBSD install on my laptop with XP and Fedora. I am familiar with Grub and would like to use that to boot freeBSD. Can someone point me to an example of a grub.conf (menu.lst) entry that will work? Or How do I configure boot manager to boot Fedora? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:03:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9316E16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:03:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3150643D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:03:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 21854 invoked by uid 502); 7 Nov 2005 15:03:42 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 15:03:42 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <436F6CCD.3020103@ywave.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:03:41 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael C. Shultz" References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <200511062113.42397.ringworm01@gmail.com> <1131348443.644.1.camel@localhost> <200511062329.47970.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200511062329.47970.ringworm01@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-6; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions , Dave Webster Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:03:43 -0000 Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Sunday 06 November 2005 23:27, Dave Webster wrote: > >>Tried the link and commented out the line in /etc/fstab, rebooted but >>still get the same problem. > > > You still get this? VVVVVVVVV > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > >>>>>>>mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device >>>>>>>pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', >>>>>>>you're on your own! > I'm not seeing the connection between the /tmp partition and a /var filesytem error. On his system they're different partitions. Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:09:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA5916A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:09:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bconklin@masongeneral.com) Received: from fw.masongeneral.com (list.masongeneral.com [66.119.204.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7336E43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:09:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bconklin@masongeneral.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by fw.masongeneral.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DBF15444; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:09:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw.masongeneral.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fw.masongeneral.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48442-05; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:09:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by fw.masongeneral.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 4365D1544A; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:09:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.masongeneral.com (mx1.masongeneral.com [172.31.195.56]) by fw.masongeneral.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7826115036; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:09:00 -0800 (PST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:09:00 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [squid-users] Squid and Active Directory Thread-Index: AcXhyUjkKk6tNeVeSPWC0aWgC520mwB44q3A From: "Brian E. Conklin" To: "Abbas Salehi" , X-Privacy-Notice: Please visit http://www.masongeneral.com/HIPAA.htm X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at masongeneral.com Cc: Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid and Active Directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:09:08 -0000 You must make sure you set the proper permissions on the winbind pipe. In my distro: root# chown root:squid /var/cache/samba/winbindd_privileged root# chmod 750 /var/cache/samba/winbindd_privileged Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE Director of Information Services Mason General Hospital http://www.masongeneral.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Abbas Salehi [mailto:abbas@isiran.ir]=20 > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 9:25 PM > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Subject: [squid-users] Squid and Active Directory >=20 >=20 > Dear sir >=20 > I did all of your recommanded from document step by step >=20 > I succeeded to joined to the domain and active directory , i=20 > can see the > domain users and > groups >=20 > kinit command works properly, >=20 > net ads testjoin > Join is OK >=20 > net ads join administrator > Joined 'squid-server' to realm 'TEST.COM' >=20 > But ntlm_auth does not work properly, >=20 > I have following error when i run it : >=20 > ntlm_auth --username=3Dadministrator > password: ****** > NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO: NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO > (0xc00000da) >=20 > when i run the squid and set the the machine as proxy,the=20 > squid authenticate > but does not accept the user >=20 > When i browes some web pages, bring the dialog box, contain user and > password and domian, > but does not accept, >=20 > We have following error in my logs >=20 > Winbind : >=20 > [2005/10/30 14:02:11, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:get_trust_pw(1033) > get_trust_pw: could not fetch trust account password for my domain > TEST.COM >=20 > Can anybody help me, >=20 > How can i solve this problem, >=20 > Regards > Abbas Salehi >=20 >=20 ====================================================================== Mason General Hospital 901 Mt. View Drive PO Box 1668 Shelton, WA 98584 http://www.masongeneral.com (360) 426-1611 ====================================================================== This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee nor authorized to receive for the addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the message. Replying to this message constitutes consent to electronic monitoring of this message. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:09:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9A516A432 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:09:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D3243D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:09:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [24.53.250.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E6F69A4D; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:09:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:09:35 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Micah Message-Id: <20051107100935.31771357.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: youshi10@u.washington.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:09:38 -0000 Micah wrote: > I'm running the i386 version of FreeBSD with 1gb ram. Didn't think to > check this before, but I'm getting ~112-113 volts into the PSU from the > surge strip. I'm probably going to get a new PSU today. The parts > store has a couple of 400 watters in the $50 range (a fortron and a > thermaltake). I'm coming to this conversation late, so I apologize if this information has already been presented. Cheap power supplies are a near guarantee that your computer will be unstable. Unfortunately, $cheap doesn't always == quality cheap. This article is the best I've ever seen for describing how important a PS is to a computer, and how difficult it is to find a reliable one: http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20040122/index.html -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:11:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5087416A424 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:11:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30CCD43D76 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:11:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 22288 invoked by uid 502); 7 Nov 2005 15:11:42 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 15:11:42 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <436F6EAE.7010605@ywave.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:11:42 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gorski, Jim" References: <309AD90BD8FC7E4383DB1ACCBF6C8DC00173AAB9@usa0300ms01.na.xerox.net> In-Reply-To: <309AD90BD8FC7E4383DB1ACCBF6C8DC00173AAB9@usa0300ms01.na.xerox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:11:50 -0000 Gorski, Jim wrote: > Micah, > > I had a motherboard fail with a similar set of symptoms. > Mine was due to bad capacitors on the motherboard itself. > Take a look and make certain that none of them are swollen > or pushing material out the top. > > Heat also leads to random resets - is your fan still running > smoothly or is it covered in dust and cat hair like mine..? > > Best of luck - hope this helps, > > Jim Gorski > > > Message: 14 > Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:59:37 -0800 > From: Garrett Cooper > Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > >>>>>Micah wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>My desktop system just started doing this last night. I was >>>>>>upgrading Gnome using the handy shell script they provide. It >>>>>>looks like sometime around 11:30pm the computer reset. This >>>>>>morning I'm trying to reinstall all the software that got lost in >>>>>>last night's reset and I get another reset in the middle of >>>>>>compiling. The last message in /var/log/messages before reboot > > is: > >>>>>>Nov 6 10:41:08 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 6001 >>>>>>Nov 6 10:58:14 trisha ntpd[489]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 >>>>>>Nov 6 13:02:57 trisha syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/ >>>>>>kernel >>>>>> >>>>>>I just ran memtest86+ and there's no memory errors. I'm guessing >>>>>>it's a hardware issue, but how do I diagnose it? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Could it be a bad power supply? Try swapping in another one and >>>>>see what happens. >>>> > I cleaned out all the fans, but they weren't that dirty. I can't test the temps while the system is under load (have to reboot and check them in the bios). My Dad said he'd bring by his spot-read thermometer if he remembers so I can check the temps of everything. The CPU heatsink and memory are cool to the touch under load. I didn't see any obvious signs of burnt/damaged components. No telltale smell either. Thanks, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:26:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEE416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:26:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EB143D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:26:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i14so520723wra for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:26:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=YoQldseXGTRVDteSyIpGcuQFvVm2u5/MN2mzA48OGEXyUkBLLp59pRlh8zt4ANyVkCa5PukiF+XDdnDsxhJinyG3EyIUiYZrGBoIZgBjOiw2lw5Azlu0wLxolSJowj3PMnIzsvd4+R4hIaLemGk8gAj8uixIs3b74vlMU8Yq6Yw= Received: by 10.54.60.9 with SMTP id i9mr1546447wra; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:26:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 13sm401395wrl.2005.11.07.07.26.06; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:26:07 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Micah Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:17:23 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <200511062329.47970.ringworm01@gmail.com> <436F6CCD.3020103@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <436F6CCD.3020103@ywave.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511070717.25113.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD questions , Dave Webster Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:26:10 -0000 On Monday 07 November 2005 07:03, Micah wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Sunday 06 November 2005 23:27, Dave Webster wrote: > >>Tried the link and commented out the line in /etc/fstab, rebooted but > >>still get the same problem. > > > > You still get this? VVVVVVVVV > > > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > > > >>>>>>>mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > >>>>>>>pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', > >>>>>>>you're on your own! > > I'm not seeing the connection between the /tmp partition and a /var > filesytem error. On his system they're different partitions. > > Micah your right, don't know what I was thinking. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:26:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F9616A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:26:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39FF43D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:26:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [24.53.250.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A4B69A4D; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:26:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:26:17 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051107102617.3abfd2c5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20051107100935.31771357.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> <20051107100935.31771357.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: micahjon@ywave.com, youshi10@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:26:20 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > Micah wrote: > > > I'm running the i386 version of FreeBSD with 1gb ram. Didn't think to > > check this before, but I'm getting ~112-113 volts into the PSU from the > > surge strip. I'm probably going to get a new PSU today. The parts > > store has a couple of 400 watters in the $50 range (a fortron and a > > thermaltake). > > I'm coming to this conversation late, so I apologize if this information > has already been presented. > > Cheap power supplies are a near guarantee that your computer will be > unstable. Unfortunately, $cheap doesn't always == quality cheap. > > This article is the best I've ever seen for describing how important > a PS is to a computer, and how difficult it is to find a reliable one: > http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20040122/index.html My mistake. This isn't the article I thought it was. It turns out that the article I'm thinking of was done in 2002, and it seems as if Tom's Hardware has been doing regular reviews of PS since. The original article was interesting in that it listed several power supplies that burned out well below their advertised voltage: http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20021021/index.html I recommend the more recent one as a guage for what manufacturers you can trust. Frankly, if you're only spending $50 on a 400W, you're probably getting a piece of junk - although Fortron has been rating well in Tom's tests. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:42:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F4C16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:42:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345AF43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:42:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5952222401 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:42:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70017-12 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:42:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1698E21FD1A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:42:46 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:42:28 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart39013989.lFloWWKFXg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511070942.41964.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: smbfs small read tuning? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:42:49 -0000 --nextPart39013989.lFloWWKFXg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I have an application that makes hundreds of thousands of small read()s (a= =20 few hundred bytes each time). If I run it directly on files on an smbfs=20 mount, the runtime is on the order of an hour. If I copy the files to my=20 local hard drive first and then run it, the total copy + run time is on the= =20 order of four minutes. The mount_smbfs(8) man page doesn't mention anything about tuning and I'm=20 not sure where else to look. Is there a way to enable some kind of=20 read-ahead cache or otherwise trade some memory or CPU for a speed boost? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart39013989.lFloWWKFXg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDb3Xx5sRg+Y0CpvERAq/+AJ9S9YK4WT0NzOxPnRMhYjgo0kg62QCgjJu+ C4jXBebtlOoSBcvvdsXpBgU= =64RY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart39013989.lFloWWKFXg-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:48:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF2B16A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:48:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722FA43D5E for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:48:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A64222407 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:48:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70017-13 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:48:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BC9222401 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:48:32 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:48:22 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511040956.19087.kirk@strauser.com> <200511060657.39674.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2449820.Ro4SCRXWNq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511070948.27910.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: Fast diff command for large files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:48:41 -0000 --nextPart2449820.Ro4SCRXWNq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 06 November 2005 07:39, Andrew P. wrote: > Note, that the difference must be kept in RAM, so it won't work if there= =20 > are multi-gig diffs, but it will work very fast if the diffs are only=20 > 10-100Mb, it will work at close to I/O speed if the diff is under 10Mb. = =20 Thanks, Andrew! My Python script runs that algorithm in 17 seconds on a=20 400MB file with 10% CPU. =46or anyone interested, here's my implementation. Note that the readline(= )=20 method in Python always returns something, even at EOF (at which point you= =20 get an empty string). Also, empty strings evaluate as "false", which is=20 why the "if not (oldline or newline): break" code exits at the end. old_records =3D [] new_records =3D [] while 1: oldline, newline =3D oldfile.readline(), newfile.readline() if not (oldline or newline): break if oldline =3D=3D newline: continue try: new_records.remove(oldline) except ValueError: if oldline: old_records.append(oldline) try: old_records.remove(newline) except ValueError: if newline: new_records.append(newline) > Hope this gives you some idea. It did. It must've been a long work week, because that all seems so obviou= s=20 in retrospect but was completely opaque at the time. Thanks again! =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2449820.Ro4SCRXWNq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDb3dL5sRg+Y0CpvERAhUcAJ0XNZ4mWtxZgvUbbPbWbX77lI/CmwCfWZrH aiMPAA3WfoC1eKlNWbAMiGA= =qYPx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2449820.Ro4SCRXWNq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:52:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF44B16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E72543D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771F1222401 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:52:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48108-16 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:52:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBADD222413 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:52:06 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:52:02 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511040956.19087.kirk@strauser.com> <200511041129.17912.kirk@strauser.com> <200511070419.jA74JjS7068019@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200511070419.jA74JjS7068019@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1594440.HCntzm2dto"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511070952.05156.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: Fast diff command for large files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:52:08 -0000 --nextPart1594440.HCntzm2dto Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 06 November 2005 22:19, Olivier Nicole wrote: > if you have access to the "legacy/FoxPro" application, it should be > modifed to add a timestamp to each reccord modification. Don't underestimate the strength of the word "legacy". To be honest, if we= =20 had the manhours to rewrite it, we'd take the opportunity to run it=20 directly against the PostgreSQL server. What we're gaining out of this system is the ability to migrate our old=20 applications at our leisure, and the opportunity to write new applications= =20 against a real RDBMS that contains the same data. It's certainly not the=20 ideal, but it's working out very well for us. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1594440.HCntzm2dto Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDb3gl5sRg+Y0CpvERAoRdAJ4zT7YJhNndo/PrOisneosw1O7VFACdGgjz Fg9YpXepHSnMuw3/FhSAaS8= =OM7A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1594440.HCntzm2dto-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:56:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EADA16A421 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:56:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348A743D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:56:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15640 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 15:56:46 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2005 15:56:46 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1B57B28441; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:56:46 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Ian Lord References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051106102933.0252b2f8@pop.msdi.ca> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Nov 2005 10:56:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051106102933.0252b2f8@pop.msdi.ca> Message-ID: <44slu81mf5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, ale@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ports: php5-mysqli 5.0.5_1 Dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:56:48 -0000 Ian Lord writes: > I just installed port php5-mysqli. One of the packages it installs at > the same time is mysql_client which is for mysql 4.1 > > If I try to manually install package for mysql50_client I get a > conflict saying I cannot install because files go at the same place. > > How can I bypass this kind of situation ? > > Is the only way is waiting for an update to package php5_mysqli or can > I force the install without creating problems ? In a quick look, I didn't see the path that gets mysql installed as a dependency for php5_mysqli. If it can work with mysql150, then you should be able to remove 1.4 and replace it with 1.5. If it needs 1.4, though, that's what you're stuck with. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:58:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143E016A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:58:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA3743D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:58:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:58:37 +0100 id 0000001F.436F79AD.00001984 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:58:37 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051107155836.GA6368@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20051106122317.46c1d99d.dick@nagual.st> <20051107113840.z3r0h3nm8cgkc8kk@netchild.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051107113840.z3r0h3nm8cgkc8kk@netchild.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: linux-glib2 unavailable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:58:40 -0000 On 07 Nov Alexander Leidinger wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/devel.html#linux-glib2 > says the distfile is available (not from FreeBSD.org...). So "make > fetch" in the port directory should fetch it... Thank you ;-) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 15:59:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6185016A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F74F43D70 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:59:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7FxJWD018394; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:59:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DC7C2B822; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:59:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:59:18 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: "Ivan S. Anisimov" Message-ID: <20051107155918.GA72376@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <1131348443.436f01db9e094@panel21.agava.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1131348443.436f01db9e094@panel21.agava.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2 x hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:59:28 -0000 --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:27:23AM +0300, Ivan S. Anisimov wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I've recently upgraded from 5.0 to 5.2 (custom kernel with the only > addition - device pcm) and encountered the following problem: x server > hangs the whole system time after time on initialization or > shutdown. x starts clearly once out of three-four times. video card is > radeon 8500 (card is not listed, I pointed xf86cfg to use ati > driver). some video modes (low resolution and bitrate) seem to be more > stable, but all of those I tried cause a lock up. Previously installed > 5.0 on the same machine worked perfectly. >=20 > Could you please help solve this? The FreeBSD version that you use, and presumably the X server are very much out of date. You should install the current FreeBSD version 6.0, and with it the current Xorg port (version 6.8.2, IIRC). I would recommend doing a fresh install from CD instead of a cvsup upgrade, but that's your choice. Chances are that this will solve your problem. If the problem persists, let us know. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDb3nWEnfvsMMhpyURAnt8AJ404mxC9mugWrfzRLaJOCwu6KqVzQCfcCYc Tj4Tn44JUWSTcaks69SsMz0= =QOQn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 16:07:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B8716A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:07:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AD343D6A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:07:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7G7jKq026887; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:07:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C6EB0B822; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:07:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:07:44 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Micah Message-ID: <20051107160744.GB72376@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Micah , "Gorski, Jim" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <309AD90BD8FC7E4383DB1ACCBF6C8DC00173AAB9@usa0300ms01.na.xerox.net> <436F6EAE.7010605@ywave.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436F6EAE.7010605@ywave.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: "Gorski, Jim" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:07:48 -0000 --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:11:42AM -0800, Micah wrote: >=20 > I cleaned out all the fans, but they weren't that dirty. I can't test=20 > the temps while the system is under load (have to reboot and check them= =20 > in the bios).=20 Try xmbmon of mbmon from the/usr/ports/sysutils/xmbmon port. That should help you read the temperatures. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDb3vQEnfvsMMhpyURArYCAJsE2hm6MVYanPWcOtIM3p8m6hB1AgCfdP4x Ly1uRqkbxQytSgJsYIKh7SQ= =ruyi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 16:17:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366D016A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:17:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB42043D5F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:17:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 26013 invoked by uid 502); 7 Nov 2005 16:17:49 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 16:17:49 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <436F7E2C.3050208@ywave.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:17:48 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland Smith References: <309AD90BD8FC7E4383DB1ACCBF6C8DC00173AAB9@usa0300ms01.na.xerox.net> <436F6EAE.7010605@ywave.com> <20051107160744.GB72376@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20051107160744.GB72376@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Gorski, Jim" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:17:51 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:11:42AM -0800, Micah wrote: > >>I cleaned out all the fans, but they weren't that dirty. I can't test >>the temps while the system is under load (have to reboot and check them >>in the bios). > > > Try xmbmon of mbmon from the/usr/ports/sysutils/xmbmon port. That should > help you read the temperatures. > > Roland Tried that before. It doesn't properly support my mobo. It displays a constant temp for both MB and CPU as 127 deg celsius (260.6 F). Thanks, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 16:19:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959FA16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:19:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4B843D77 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:19:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so159978nzo for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:19:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=emkzwtSe0pSY+zObl5mApwa4PyAN0cvo4ko8oH+RB0o3bZr879VnE6uuaXOdDtExlhbx9CyW/sNh/3MtQlObctqaHnJjYsTwIRVjAkXTK4PJz1/Kht21gnhLLtou2UNFNIMKL+jlRyX25fcTzF7j4s/9RpiysZUm3C3nvPkN4+g= Received: by 10.65.193.17 with SMTP id v17mr5436860qbp; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.253.2 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:19:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990511070819g2d5d5bfchf507626a33c921f2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:19:30 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: "Michael C. Shultz" In-Reply-To: <200511070717.25113.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <200511062329.47970.ringworm01@gmail.com> <436F6CCD.3020103@ywave.com> <200511070717.25113.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD questions , Dave Webster Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:19:33 -0000 On 11/7/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Monday 07 November 2005 07:03, Micah wrote: > > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > On Sunday 06 November 2005 23:27, Dave Webster wrote: > > >>Tried the link and commented out the line in /etc/fstab, rebooted bu= t > > >>still get the same problem. > > > > > > You still get this? VVVVVVVVV > > > > > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > > > > > >>>>>>>mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > > >>>>>>>pkg_add: can't record package infor '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2'= , > > >>>>>>>you're on your own! > > > > I'm not seeing the connection between the /tmp partition and a /var > > filesytem error. On his system they're different partitions. > > > > Micah > > your right, don't know what I was thinking. It is still entirely reasonable to assume that he is running out of space on /var because of something using /var/tmp. I'd like to see the output of "ls -l /var" and "ls -l /". The results of "df" and of "du -d2 /var" with the new configuration (/var/tmp linked to /usr/tmp) taken while pkg_add is running _before_ the error message appears would be good, too. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 16:28:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DA216A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:28:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6582A43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:28:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7GRwar058481; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:27:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6ACCDB822; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:27:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:27:58 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Micah Message-ID: <20051107162758.GA73305@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Micah , "Gorski, Jim" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <309AD90BD8FC7E4383DB1ACCBF6C8DC00173AAB9@usa0300ms01.na.xerox.net> <436F6EAE.7010605@ywave.com> <20051107160744.GB72376@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436F7E2C.3050208@ywave.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436F7E2C.3050208@ywave.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: "Gorski, Jim" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:28:04 -0000 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:17:48AM -0800, Micah wrote: > Roland Smith wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:11:42AM -0800, Micah wrote: > > > >>I cleaned out all the fans, but they weren't that dirty. I can't test= =20 > >>the temps while the system is under load (have to reboot and check them= =20 > >>in the bios).=20 > > > > > >Try xmbmon of mbmon from the/usr/ports/sysutils/xmbmon port. That should > >help you read the temperatures. > > > >Roland >=20 > Tried that before. It doesn't properly support my mobo. It displays a= =20 > constant temp for both MB and CPU as 127 deg celsius (260.6 F). Try forcing another access method. With the standard method my mobo also give bogus values: slackbox:~$ mbmon -c1 =20 Temp.=3D 127.0, 127.0, 0.0; Rot.=3D 0, 0, 0 Vcore =3D 0.00, 0.00; Volt. =3D 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Forcing access via an ISA port gives the correct result: slackbox:~$ mbmon -c1 -I Temp.=3D 26.0, 39.5, 21.5; Rot.=3D 1117, 2280, 0 Vcore =3D 1.39, 2.99; Volt. =3D 3.34, 5.05, 15.50, 1.54, -6.10 Hope this helps, Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDb4COEnfvsMMhpyURAg9iAJ9Flwf5UBUliAzxjGuIoy+5oQH8JwCgjFkX /3Cb1Am/WS6IBynNHXE5KhU= =c0Sz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 16:31:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E6B16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:31:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CCD43D62 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:31:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i32so352088wra for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:31:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=MvUl62YVJX2o22ArindvBQUS3aQnv3nQuzCWRTSvpCwWfvgLGbjbA7kb8YnsD2Ti4MF4HoIZS2mUJ27wBFNsEicoWknKPC8jUt0hCzZEJ2woDDZtJZ/ILYNR2EX/mgm+nhcZljeHbQjmJ9xpuN7+zLqberkMlMucPzVWmrHEsow= Received: by 10.54.100.2 with SMTP id x2mr4350405wrb; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:31:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 26sm3205169wrl.2005.11.07.08.31.41; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:31:42 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Bob Johnson Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:23:00 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <200511070717.25113.ringworm01@gmail.com> <54db43990511070819g2d5d5bfchf507626a33c921f2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54db43990511070819g2d5d5bfchf507626a33c921f2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511070823.01175.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD questions , Dave Webster Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:31:48 -0000 On Monday 07 November 2005 08:19, Bob Johnson wrote: > On 11/7/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Monday 07 November 2005 07:03, Micah wrote: > > > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > On Sunday 06 November 2005 23:27, Dave Webster wrote: > > > >>Tried the link and commented out the line in /etc/fstab, rebooted > > > >> but still get the same problem. > > > > > > > > You still get this? VVVVVVVVV > > > > > > > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > > > > > > > >>>>>>>mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > > > >>>>>>>pkg_add: can't record package infor > > > >>>>>>> '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', you're on your own! > > > > > > I'm not seeing the connection between the /tmp partition and a /var > > > filesytem error. On his system they're different partitions. > > > > > > Micah > > > > your right, don't know what I was thinking. > > It is still entirely reasonable to assume that he is running out of > space on /var because of something using /var/tmp. > > I'd like to see the output of "ls -l /var" and "ls -l /". > > The results of "df" and of "du -d2 /var" with the new configuration > (/var/tmp linked to /usr/tmp) taken while pkg_add is running _before_ > the error message appears would be good, too. > > - Bob I wonder, can he register another, smaller port now? Just how broke is /var/db/pkg ??? -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 16:40:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038F216A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E9343D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:40:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 907E97E32; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:40:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D267E12; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:40:46 -0500 (EST) References: <200511040956.19087.kirk@strauser.com> <436B8ADF.4000703@mac.com> <200511041129.17912.kirk@strauser.com> Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: "francisco@natserv.net" To: Kirk Strauser Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:40:46 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast diff command for large files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:40:50 -0000 Kirk Strauser writes: > Our legacy application runs on FoxPro. Our web application runs on a > PostgreSQL database that's a mirror of the FoxPro tables. I had the same setup a while back. A few suggestions. * Add a date/changed field in Foxpro and update. * If only recent records are updated, only copy those over * Add a "changed" flag in Foxpro tables * Load entire foxpro tables every time and do a delete/reload withing a single transaction. The idea situation is if you can somehow segreate your older, non changeable data, and copy every day only records that are recent.. even if they have not changed. What type of system is this? In particular do any record can be modified or are only recent records changed? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:02:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6933416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:02:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2EF43D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:02:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:02:10 +0100 id 00000042.436F8892.00001CA5 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:02:10 +0100 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20051107170210.GA7324@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20051106122317.46c1d99d.dick@nagual.st> <20051107113840.z3r0h3nm8cgkc8kk@netchild.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051107113840.z3r0h3nm8cgkc8kk@netchild.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: Re: linux-glib2 unavailable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:02:12 -0000 On 07 Nov Alexander Leidinger wrote: > dick hoogendijk wrote: > > >A lot of linux related ports won't install on my fbsd-6.0 system due > >to the following error: > > > >fetch: > >ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/glib2-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm: > >File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch > >it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into > >/usr/ports/distfiles/rpm and try again. *** Error code 1 > > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/devel.html#linux-glib2 > says the distfile is available (not from FreeBSD.org...). So "make > fetch" in the port directory should fetch it... I thanked you already, but alas, too soon ;-/ The file should be fetchable from http://gtk.org.ok This is a non-existant address. -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4 + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:05:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716D416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:05:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F79943D5C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.253.228] ([82.41.253.228]) by smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:06:40 +0000 Message-ID: <436F896B.2040404@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:05:47 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: micahjon@ywave.com References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> <20051107100935.31771357.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20051107102617.3abfd2c5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20051107102617.3abfd2c5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2005 17:06:40.0171 (UTC) FILETIME=[9EC127B0:01C5E3BD] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:05:58 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >Bill Moran wrote: > > > >>Micah wrote: >> >> >> >>>I'm running the i386 version of FreeBSD with 1gb ram. Didn't think to >>>check this before, but I'm getting ~112-113 volts into the PSU from the >>>surge strip. I'm probably going to get a new PSU today. The parts >>>store has a couple of 400 watters in the $50 range (a fortron and a >>>thermaltake). >>> >>> >>Cheap power supplies are a near guarantee that your computer will be >>unstable. Unfortunately, $cheap doesn't always == quality cheap. >> >> >I recommend the more recent one as a guage for what manufacturers you >can trust. Frankly, if you're only spending $50 on a 400W, you're >probably getting a piece of junk - although Fortron has been rating >well in Tom's tests. > > A PSU actually capable of 350W *ought* to have done you fine, but many cheap PSUs, as Bill says, just don't cut it. I'd personally recommend a Seasonic, which won't be cheap, but will be quiet and reliable if mine is anything to go by. Antec also seem to have a reasonable rep. There's a nice wattage claculator here: http://www.jscustompcs.com/power_supply/Power_Supply_Calculator.php? --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:08:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303B416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:08:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FA043D5A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:08:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.253.228] ([82.41.253.228]) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:09:34 +0000 Message-ID: <436F8A1A.6050301@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:08:42 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Micah References: <309AD90BD8FC7E4383DB1ACCBF6C8DC00173AAB9@usa0300ms01.na.xerox.net> <436F6EAE.7010605@ywave.com> <20051107160744.GB72376@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436F7E2C.3050208@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <436F7E2C.3050208@ywave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2005 17:09:34.0505 (UTC) FILETIME=[06AA6990:01C5E3BE] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:08:44 -0000 Micah wrote: > Roland Smith wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:11:42AM -0800, Micah wrote: >> >>> I cleaned out all the fans, but they weren't that dirty. I can't >>> test the temps while the system is under load (have to reboot and >>> check them in the bios). >> >> >> >> Try xmbmon of mbmon from the/usr/ports/sysutils/xmbmon port. That should >> help you read the temperatures. > > > Tried that before. It doesn't properly support my mobo. It displays > a constant temp for both MB and CPU as 127 deg celsius (260.6 F). > > On an ASUS Athlon 64 board (that's what you have isn't it?), -p winbond worked reasonably for me. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:14:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08EB16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:14:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp1.linkline.com (smtp1.linkline.com [66.59.235.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795B643D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:14:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp1.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544179CE87 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:14:25 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:14:25 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: How to sort find results Thread-Index: AcXjvrPQ8oDiGE+xEdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <20051107120056.2BF1F16A424@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:14:28 -0000 Ok. It looks like: Find -x / -ls basically gives me what I need. But I am seeing two things I still need to do to the results. First, I need to sort the ls by modification time. It seems none of the options for ls work from within find -- or at least with the syntax ls -x. I also looked at doing something like find -x / -ls | sort, but when I look at the sort man, it doesn't say how to sort by particular criteria. The other thing is in the find man it says the -ls option displays the modification time of each file, but what I see is actually just the date "May 21 2004". No times. Is there a way to display the actual times? Thanks again :) All My Best, Jeffrey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:26:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0405416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:26:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 454F143D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:26:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 30678 invoked by uid 502); 7 Nov 2005 17:26:07 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 17:26:07 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <436F8E2E.802@ywave.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:26:06 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Zbyslaw References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> <20051107100935.31771357.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20051107102617.3abfd2c5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <436F896B.2040404@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <436F896B.2040404@dial.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:26:10 -0000 Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > >> Bill Moran wrote: >> >> >> >>> Micah wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm running the i386 version of FreeBSD with 1gb ram. Didn't think >>>> to check this before, but I'm getting ~112-113 volts into the PSU >>>> from the surge strip. I'm probably going to get a new PSU today. >>>> The parts store has a couple of 400 watters in the $50 range (a >>>> fortron and a thermaltake). >>>> >>> >>> Cheap power supplies are a near guarantee that your computer will be >>> unstable. Unfortunately, $cheap doesn't always == quality cheap. >>> >> >> I recommend the more recent one as a guage for what manufacturers you >> can trust. Frankly, if you're only spending $50 on a 400W, you're >> probably getting a piece of junk - although Fortron has been rating >> well in Tom's tests. >> >> > A PSU actually capable of 350W *ought* to have done you fine, but many > cheap PSUs, as Bill says, just don't cut it. I'd personally recommend a > Seasonic, which won't be cheap, but will be quiet and reliable if mine > is anything to go by. Antec also seem to have a reasonable rep. > > There's a nice wattage claculator here: > http://www.jscustompcs.com/power_supply/Power_Supply_Calculator.php? > > --Alex Thanks for the link. I actually used that calculator when I pieced this machine together. I'm really beginning to doubt it's the PSU. Why? I cannot get the output voltage to drop no matter what load I throw at it. I plugged in four additional hard drives and ran a system stress test and still the voltages remained rock steady at the values I stated earlier. I ran it for an hours with the high-low monitor on a Fluke multimeter. The +5 stayed near 5.1 with 5.08 as the bottom, and the +12 stayed near 11.89 with 11.84 as the minimum. I even had one of the "random segfaults" and the +12 voltage never dropped below 11.84. I'm not sure how I can get the load any higher without using resistors which most certainly does not simulate the load I'm generating while compiling. That leaves memory, CPU or mobo. I ran memtest86+ and it reported no errors. I'll run it again for an extended period of time while I'm at school to see if it reports anything. That leaves CPU and mobo. Anyone got any ideas how to test those? The only system test I can run that does report an error is Lucifer 1.0 (on the ultimate boot cd). The mprime test and cpuburn do not find any errors. Thanks, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:26:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FA216A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:26:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [216.148.227.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CC143D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:26:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20051107172622015005rvhfe>; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:26:23 +0000 Message-ID: <436F39DB.7070003@computer.org> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:26:19 +0000 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeffrey Ellis References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:26:24 -0000 Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > Ok. It looks like: > > Find -x / -ls > > basically gives me what I need. But I am seeing two things I still need to > do to the results. First, I need to sort the ls by modification time. It > seems none of the options for ls work from within find -- or at least with > the syntax ls -x. I also looked at doing something like find -x / -ls | > sort, but when I look at the sort man, it doesn't say how to sort by Double check that man page... Look for '-k'.. you can specify your sort key. HTH > particular criteria. > > The other thing is in the find man it says the -ls option displays the > modification time of each file, but what I see is actually just the date > "May 21 2004". No times. Is there a way to display the actual times? > > Thanks again :) > > All My Best, > Jeffrey > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:29:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738ED16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:29:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BBB43D6B for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:29:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522F222240A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:29:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97838-08 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:29:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FF8222408 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:29:36 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:29:32 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511040956.19087.kirk@strauser.com> <200511041129.17912.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2694721.7iXZAHlP67"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511071129.34262.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: Fast diff command for large files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:29:41 -0000 --nextPart2694721.7iXZAHlP67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 07 November 2005 10:40, francisco@natserv.net wrote: > I had the same setup a while back. > A few suggestions. Thanks for the tips; unfortunately, any fix that involves touching the=20 =46oxPro code is basically impossible. It's not that we *can't*, but that= =20 the sole FoxPro programmer at our company is completely occupied with other= =20 projects. > What type of system is this? In particular do any record can be modified > or are only recent records changed? Nope - every line in each table is subject to change. Here's how our current system works: 1) Copy each FoxPro table file (and associated memo file if one exists) to = a=20 Unix server via Samba. 2) Run my modified version of the "xbase" program to convert each table to = a=20 tab-delimited file that can be loaded into PostgreSQL using the "copy=20 table" command. These files are named "foo.dump", "bar.dump", etc. 3) If "foo.dump-old" exists: a) Using Andrew's algorithm, get the difference between foo.dump-old and foo.dump. Write these out as a set of "delete from ..." commands and a "copy table" command. Pipe this relatively tiny file into the "psql" command to upload the modifications. Otherwise: b) Use the psql command to upload foo.dump 4) "mv foo.dump foo.dump-old" 5) Profit! I've already cut the runtime in half. The next big step is going to be=20 getting our Windows admin to install rsync on the fileserver so that we can= =20 minimize the time spent in step one. With the exception of the space=20 required by keeping the old version of the dump files (step 4), this is=20 exceeding all of our performance expectations by a wide margin. Even better, step 3a cuts the time that the PostgreSQL server has to spend= =20 committing the new data by several orders of magnitude. The net effect is= =20 that our web visitors don't see a noticeable slowdown during the import=20 stage. =20 =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2694721.7iXZAHlP67 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDb47+5sRg+Y0CpvERAn3HAJ48eDr6BzIr4ynASeXtd4EQPKRiLACdFfe1 VMB6s+iELhud7pAvWPhqRBU= =7EEU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2694721.7iXZAHlP67-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:41:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFEA16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp1.linkline.com (smtp1.linkline.com [66.59.235.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BEC43D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp1.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E257C9CD84; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:41:40 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:41:41 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: Eric Schuele , Jeffrey Ellis Message-ID: Thread-Topic: How to sort find results Thread-Index: AcXjwoLywYScCk+1EdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <436F39DB.7070003@computer.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:41:44 -0000 Aha... Thanks, Eric :) Well, at least I know it can do it now. The problem -- as usual for a newbie -- is that I haven't got the vaguest understanding of what I just read. The field part I think I get, but how would I use the first character? I guess I'm basically too stupid to get these kind of instructions -- maybe just one example for the use of each option included in man pages would help? Anyway -- I don't think I'll ever get how to use this on my own. All My Best, Jeffrey on 11/7/05 3:26 AM, Eric Schuele at e.schuele@computer.org wrote: > Jeffrey Ellis wrote: >> Ok. It looks like: >> >> Find -x / -ls >> >> basically gives me what I need. But I am seeing two things I still need to >> do to the results. First, I need to sort the ls by modification time. It >> seems none of the options for ls work from within find -- or at least with >> the syntax ls -x. I also looked at doing something like find -x / -ls | >> sort, but when I look at the sort man, it doesn't say how to sort by > > Double check that man page... > Look for '-k'.. you can specify your sort key. > > HTH > >> particular criteria. >> >> The other thing is in the find man it says the -ls option displays the >> modification time of each file, but what I see is actually just the date >> "May 21 2004". No times. Is there a way to display the actual times? >> >> Thanks again :) >> >> All My Best, >> Jeffrey >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:44:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5982C16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:44:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F6EC43D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from liam.billschoolcraft.com ([63.204.157.14]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:44:46 -0800 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:44:47 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Schoolcraft X-X-Sender: bill@liam.billschoolcraft.com To: Micah In-Reply-To: <436F8E2E.802@ywave.com> Message-ID: <20051107094015.R55967@liam.billschoolcraft.com> References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> <20051107100935.31771357.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20051107102617.3abfd2c5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <436F896B.2040404@dial.pipex.com> <436F8E2E.802@ywave.com> System-ID: [en] (FreeBSD 5.4 amd64) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Alex Zbyslaw Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:44:50 -0000 At Mon, 7 Nov 2005 it looks like Micah composed: > Alex Zbyslaw wrote: >> Bill Moran wrote: >> >>> Bill Moran wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Micah wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I'm running the i386 version of FreeBSD with 1gb ram. Didn't think to >>>>> check this before, but I'm getting ~112-113 volts into the PSU from the >>>>> surge strip. I'm probably going to get a new PSU today. The parts >>>>> store has a couple of 400 watters in the $50 range (a fortron and a >>>>> thermaltake). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Cheap power supplies are a near guarantee that your computer will be >>>> unstable. Unfortunately, $cheap doesn't always == quality cheap. >>>> >>> >>> I recommend the more recent one as a guage for what manufacturers you >>> can trust. Frankly, if you're only spending $50 on a 400W, you're >>> probably getting a piece of junk - although Fortron has been rating >>> well in Tom's tests. >>> >> A PSU actually capable of 350W *ought* to have done you fine, but many >> cheap PSUs, as Bill says, just don't cut it. I'd personally recommend a >> Seasonic, which won't be cheap, but will be quiet and reliable if mine is >> anything to go by. Antec also seem to have a reasonable rep. >> >> There's a nice wattage claculator here: >> http://www.jscustompcs.com/power_supply/Power_Supply_Calculator.php? >> >> --Alex > > Thanks for the link. I actually used that calculator when I pieced this > machine together. > > I'm really beginning to doubt it's the PSU. Why? I cannot get the output > voltage to drop no matter what load I throw at it. I plugged in four > additional hard drives and ran a system stress test and still the voltages > remained rock steady at the values I stated earlier. I ran it for an hours > with the high-low monitor on a Fluke multimeter. The +5 stayed near 5.1 with > 5.08 as the bottom, and the +12 stayed near 11.89 with 11.84 as the minimum. > I even had one of the "random segfaults" and the +12 voltage never dropped > below 11.84. I'm not sure how I can get the load any higher without using > resistors which most certainly does not simulate the load I'm generating > while compiling. Hello, How were you using the Fluke meter to test amperage? I was not aware that it would work with a ground line embedded inside the power cable? I currently have a Fluke-T5-600 and I'm curious about the above test. http://www.tequipment.net/FlukeT5-600VoltageTester.html Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:47:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BE616A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:47:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD1E43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:47:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7365FAC; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:47:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08690-01; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:47:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACB05CE9; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:47:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200511070942.41964.kirk@strauser.com> References: <200511070942.41964.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:47:27 -0500 To: Kirk Strauser X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs small read tuning? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:47:33 -0000 On Nov 7, 2005, at 10:42 AM, Kirk Strauser wrote: > I have an application that makes hundreds of thousands of small read > ()s (a > few hundred bytes each time). If I run it directly on files on an > smbfs > mount, the runtime is on the order of an hour. If I copy the files > to my > local hard drive first and then run it, the total copy + run time > is on the > order of four minutes. > > The mount_smbfs(8) man page doesn't mention anything about tuning > and I'm > not sure where else to look. Is there a way to enable some kind of > read-ahead cache or otherwise trade some memory or CPU for a speed > boost? Yes, but most of the tunables are on the server side. If the server is running Samba, look for the client caching tuning option in smb.conf ("csc policy") and the various oplocks options. You want to have level-2 oplocks working for best performance... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:57:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9FD16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:57:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D2BA43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:56:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 54311 invoked by uid 0); 7 Nov 2005 17:56:57 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 17:56:57 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA7Ca9hL063289; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:36:09 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Message-ID: <436F4A39.8060804@alphaque.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:36:09 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051026 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Webster References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <200511061658.30611.ringworm01@gmail.com> <1131339478.1078.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1131339478.1078.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions , "Michael C. Shultz" Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:57:01 -0000 On 11/07/05 12:57 Dave Webster said the following: > Thanks for the response, > I edited the /etc/rc.conf with the clear_tmp_enable="YES" > rebooted > reran pkg_add -r openoffice you're running out of space on /var, and an openoffice package install takes up a lot in /var/tmp. what you can do, since you seem to have gigs available in /usr, is to mv /var/tmp to /usr and create a link from /var/tmp to /usr/tmp and try again. 256MB for a /var partition these days is small, and i normally use >1GB on it if disk space isnt a problem. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 17:59:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB1616A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882B743D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:59:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5874222408 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:59:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97838-11 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:59:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0EC222401 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:59:22 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:59:07 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511070942.41964.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1310423.xQGJTBTNXe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511071159.21379.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: smbfs small read tuning? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:59:25 -0000 --nextPart1310423.xQGJTBTNXe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 07 November 2005 11:47, Charles Swiger wrote: > Yes, but most of the tunables are on the server side. If the server > is running Samba, look for the client caching tuning option in > smb.conf ("csc policy") and the various oplocks options. You want to > have level-2 oplocks working for best performance... Nuts. The server is a Windows XP (or 2003) machine. I'll see what our=20 Windows guy can come up with. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1310423.xQGJTBTNXe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDb5X55sRg+Y0CpvERAmV+AJ0alKWKVtmIBNWxdXRHtLOhXkBhmACgmPlG OLz1qXD4Ejc2+beDHq5zEP8= =/O4c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1310423.xQGJTBTNXe-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:13:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BB616A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:13:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C4C43D5E for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:13:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (danm@localhost.gushi.org [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA7IGRZf026500 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:16:28 -0500 (EST) Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jA7IGRxO026497; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:16:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:16:27 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051107131443.E26113@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Subject: build ports without X -- make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:13:52 -0000 Hey all, In BSD 4.x, there was a section in the make.conf manpage that said you could define WITHOUT_X11 and ports would build without it (for things like ghostscript, cvsup, etc, which have distinctly different ports) For some reason this is gone in 5.x -- what's the appropriate way to do this now (since WITHOUT_X11 still worked on a couple ports I've tried.) If this is still the valid way, shouldn't it be documented as such? -Dan -- "A mother can be an inspiration to her little son, change his thoughts, his mind, his life, just with her gentle hum." -No Doubt, "Different People", from "Tragic Kingdom" --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:16:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E6E16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:16:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from mra01.ch.as12513.net (mra01.ch.as12513.net [82.153.252.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3501043D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:16:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@xk7.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mra01.ch.as12513.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FA128C6A2; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:16:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mra01.ch.as12513.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mra01.ch.as12513.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27373-01-34; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:16:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kryten.xk7.net (unknown [81.168.90.101]) by mra01.ch.as12513.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D4328C5CC; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:16:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: by kryten.xk7.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1D54C17040; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:14:02 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:14:02 +0000 From: Paul Waring To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" Message-ID: <20051107181402.GB25639@kryten.xk7.net> References: <20051107131443.E26113@prime.gushi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051107131443.E26113@prime.gushi.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: build ports without X -- make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:16:23 -0000 On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:16:27PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: > In BSD 4.x, there was a section in the make.conf manpage that said you > could define WITHOUT_X11 and ports would build without it (for things like > ghostscript, cvsup, etc, which have distinctly different ports) > > For some reason this is gone in 5.x -- what's the appropriate way to do > this now (since WITHOUT_X11 still worked on a couple ports I've tried.) Who told you it had gone? I've been using WITHOUT_X11=yes ever since I started using FreeBSD as a server operating system, and it's always had the intended result, even up until now as I'm ready to go from 5.4->6.0. Paul -- Rogue Tory http://www.roguetory.org.uk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:19:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA70216A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:19:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4ED43D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:19:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (danm@localhost.gushi.org [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA7ILeXs028543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:21:40 -0500 (EST) Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jA7ILe2S028542; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:21:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:21:40 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: Paul Waring In-Reply-To: <20051107181402.GB25639@kryten.xk7.net> Message-ID: <20051107132042.M34776@prime.gushi.org> References: <20051107131443.E26113@prime.gushi.org> <20051107181402.GB25639@kryten.xk7.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: build ports without X -- make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:19:01 -0000 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Paul Waring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:16:27PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >> In BSD 4.x, there was a section in the make.conf manpage that said you >> could define WITHOUT_X11 and ports would build without it (for things like >> ghostscript, cvsup, etc, which have distinctly different ports) >> >> For some reason this is gone in 5.x -- what's the appropriate way to do >> this now (since WITHOUT_X11 still worked on a couple ports I've tried.) > > Who told you it had gone? I've been using WITHOUT_X11=yes ever since I > started using FreeBSD as a server operating system, and it's always had > the intended result, even up until now as I'm ready to go from 5.4->6.0. man make.conf has lost the entry for the option. I have to imagine it was removed for a reason. -Dan -- "SOY BOMB!" -The Chest of the nameless streaker of the 1998 Grammy Awards' Bob Dylan Performance. --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:25:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8445316A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:25:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwb@homer.att.com) Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com (mail121.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9B9843D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:25:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwb@homer.att.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: jwb@homer.att.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1131387928!6991448!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.9.1; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [134.24.146.4] Received: (qmail 23812 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 18:25:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ulysses.homer.att.com) (134.24.146.4) by server-15.tower-121.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 18:25:28 -0000 Received: from akiva.homer.att.com (akiva.homer.att.com [135.205.212.39]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA15521 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:25:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from akiva.homer.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by akiva.homer.att.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id jA7IPQj03230 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:25:27 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200511071825.jA7IPQj03230@akiva.homer.att.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:25:26 -0500 From: "J. W. Ballantine" Subject: 5-STABLE to 6-RELEASE upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:25:33 -0000 I'm trying to upgrade from 5-STABLE to 6-RELEASE, and I fail during the kernel install phase of the process. I deleleted the /usr/src tree and did a cvsup to get the new bits. I then ran a make world; make buildkernel; and then a make installkernel. This steps fails with: cd /var/tmp/temproot/usr/share/openssl/man; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" /usr/src/etc/man.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm -rf "$1" ; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done cd /var/tmp/temproot/usr/share/openssl/man/en.ISO8859-1; ln -sf ../man* . cd /var/tmp/temproot/usr/share/nls; set - `grep "^[a-zA-Z]" /usr/src/etc/nls.alias`; while [ $# -gt 0 ] ; do rm -rf "$1"; ln -s "$2" "$1"; shift; shift; done /var/tmp/temproot/usr/obj/usr/src/etc created for /usr/src/etc cd /usr/src/etc; install -o root -g wheel -m 644 amd.map apmd.conf auth.conf crontab csh.cshrc csh.login csh.logout devd.conf dev fs.conf dhclient.conf disktab fbtab ftpusers gettytab group hosts hosts.allow hosts.equiv hosts.lpd inetd.conf login.access login .conf mac.conf motd netconfig network.subr networks newsyslog.conf portsnap.conf pf.conf pf.os phones profile protocols rc rc.bsd extended rc.firewall rc.firewall6 rc.initdiskless rc.sendmail rc.shutdown rc.subr remote rpc services shells snmpd.config sysctl. conf syslog.conf usbd.conf etc.i386/ttys /usr/src/etc/../gnu/usr.bin/man/manp ath/manpath.config /usr/src/etc/../usr.bin/mail/misc /mail.rc /usr/src/etc/../usr.bin/locate/locate/locate.rc printcap /var/tmp/temproot/etc; cap_mkdb -l /var/tmp/temproot/etc/login.c onf; install -o root -g wheel -m 755 netstart pccard_ether rc.suspend rc.resume /var/tmp/temproot/etc; install -o root -g wheel - m 600 master.passwd nsmb.conf opieaccess /var/tmp/temproot/etc; pwd_mkdb -L -p -d /var/tmp/temproot/etc /var/tmp/temproot/etc/mas ter.passwd cap_mkdb: illegal option -- l usage: cap_mkdb [-v] [-f outfile] file [file ...] *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/etc. *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src/etc and install files to the temproot environment Any ideas on what need to be done to get this to run??? Thanks Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:26:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7361116A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:26:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC43C43D78 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:26:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so453024wxc for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:26:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=gS8m91vyz9bLH3A6wm1XPB+Esod5veWBl5NmXTN0MKw3mgQ9SwK1Jr1IxxMVZUkE2dJWtZG6zJ3yXcG26eFMn3OO4HimmoHyBaAWB8i1/yWvdGisu2DXjqIsm8fQn7wmomG2N/dlDOtgOB8iIlLT+U3Vhuj2JulLZqvSTLroic0= Received: by 10.70.96.6 with SMTP id t6mr457149wxb; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:35:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i35sm1690550wxd.2005.11.07.08.35.14; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:35:15 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: Bob Johnson Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:26:33 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <54db43990511070819g2d5d5bfchf507626a33c921f2@mail.gmail.com> <200511070823.01175.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200511070823.01175.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511070826.33840.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD questions , Dave Webster Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:26:20 -0000 On Monday 07 November 2005 08:23, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Monday 07 November 2005 08:19, Bob Johnson wrote: > > On 11/7/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > On Monday 07 November 2005 07:03, Micah wrote: > > > > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > > On Sunday 06 November 2005 23:27, Dave Webster wrote: > > > > >>Tried the link and commented out the line in /etc/fstab, rebooted > > > > >> but still get the same problem. > > > > > > > > > > You still get this? VVVVVVVVV > > > > > > > > > > /var: write failed, filesystem is full > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>mkdir: /var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2: No space left on device > > > > >>>>>>>pkg_add: can't record package infor > > > > >>>>>>> '/var/db/pkg/ORBit-0.5.17_2', you're on your own! > > > > > > > > I'm not seeing the connection between the /tmp partition and a /var > > > > filesytem error. On his system they're different partitions. > > > > > > > > Micah > > > > > > your right, don't know what I was thinking. > > > > It is still entirely reasonable to assume that he is running out of > > space on /var because of something using /var/tmp. > > > > I'd like to see the output of "ls -l /var" and "ls -l /". > > > > The results of "df" and of "du -d2 /var" with the new configuration > > (/var/tmp linked to /usr/tmp) taken while pkg_add is running _before_ > > the error message appears would be good, too. > > > > - Bob > > I wonder, can he register another, smaller port now? Just how broke is > /var/db/pkg ??? > > > -Mike He should link /var/tmp to /usr/tmp also you think? -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:30:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F4E16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:30:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7FD43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EZBi5-0006Sc-N8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:27:13 +0100 Received: from r5k101.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.10.101]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:27:13 +0100 Received: from martinkov by r5k101.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:27:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:23:53 +0100 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> <20051106204852.GB25399@ada.devbox.be> <20051106220942.GC904@zaphod.nitro.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5k101.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050925 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20051106220942.GC904@zaphod.nitro.dk> Sender: news Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened with portaudit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:30:06 -0000 Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2005.11.06 21:48:52 +0100, Jimmy Scott wrote: > >>On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:30:00PM +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4, >>>ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security >>>run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the >>>affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but >>>now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three >>>packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody suspect what's wrong? >> >>I noticed the same, but didn't had the time to look for a possible >>answer on that question. > > > It does seem to work for me now. Could people having this problem > please check the size of /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz and try to > run portaudit -Fa to refetch the database and check again? > > For reference: > > [simon@zaphod:/tmp] ls -l /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31762 6 Nov 22:40 /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz > > There have been one previous report where a problem with the portaudit > database build resulted in an incomplete auditfile which was then > fixed after the next portaudit database rebuild. > it works now. and yes, i did portaudit -Fda several times during that day to no avail. m. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:34:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE4816A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:34:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6960D43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:34:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 55190 invoked by uid 0); 7 Nov 2005 18:34:25 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 18:34:25 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA7IXprr001849 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:33:51 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Message-ID: <436F9E0F.5040800@alphaque.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:33:51 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051026 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <20051107131443.E26113@prime.gushi.org> In-Reply-To: <20051107131443.E26113@prime.gushi.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: build ports without X -- make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:34:28 -0000 On 11/08/05 02:16 Dan Mahoney, System Admin said the following: > For some reason this is gone in 5.x -- what's the appropriate way to do > this now (since WITHOUT_X11 still worked on a couple ports I've tried.) am also not sure if this is related, but an install of 6.0-RELEASE followed by a cvsup of RELENG_6 yesterday didnt have an /etc/make.conf. is this an omission or is this by design ? -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:35:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63A316A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:35:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC1843D4C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:35:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EZBnK-0008Jb-Kq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:32:38 +0100 Received: from r5k101.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.10.101]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:32:38 +0100 Received: from martinkov by r5k101.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:32:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:30:19 +0100 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <20051106120047.EE5CF16A422@hub.freebsd.org> <20051106181233.14044.qmail@web80902.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5k101.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050925 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20051106181233.14044.qmail@web80902.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: New Logo - http://logo-contest.freebsd.org/result/ (OFF-TOPIC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:35:07 -0000 Allen D. Tate wrote: >>Very disappointing. I prefer the current logo over a ball with two >>horns!!! and the font used to write FreeBSD is very unprofessional. > > > It is interesting to see differing opinions. I kinda like the new logo > and new font and think that it does look professional. I am not saying > that your opinion is wrong in any way so don't think I am saying you're > wrong. :) > > > > __________________________________ > Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > well, everyone has a different opinion on this. but even without saying whether i like the new font or not, when i look at it closely it does look that it needs more touch and polishing. i'm not an expert on typography, it's just a feeling. it would be usefull if the font was published in a vector format or at least in big resolution. the same goes for the rest of presented art. martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:40:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16F716A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:40:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FF343D55 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:40:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so456108wxc for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:40:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dyevB1hMEShpZJYHbRojFO9XP4NcmZjN0xe1NXG3LivxNRVYXtVLk58sk7AkOZHw8VchmdlYs6RxzyVIs/r22fiX05AZBc91A8Y277jJXzBZq3YBao6dvQnjfc+rlqVBixU4ppccAzeZafvgmsyOJjGLTkAHWfeKDmAktC3/tmY= Received: by 10.70.61.8 with SMTP id j8mr947033wxa; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:40:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.104.18 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:40:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <35c231bf0511071040p5d47ef02td66f7596a200311b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:40:30 -0800 From: David Kirchner Sender: dpkirchner@gmail.com To: Dinesh Nair In-Reply-To: <436F9E0F.5040800@alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051107131443.E26113@prime.gushi.org> <436F9E0F.5040800@alphaque.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: build ports without X -- make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:40:35 -0000 On 11/7/05, Dinesh Nair wrote: > > > On 11/08/05 02:16 Dan Mahoney, System Admin said the following: > > For some reason this is gone in 5.x -- what's the appropriate way to do > > this now (since WITHOUT_X11 still worked on a couple ports I've tried.) > > am also not sure if this is related, but an install of 6.0-RELEASE follow= ed > by a cvsup of RELENG_6 yesterday didnt have an /etc/make.conf. is this an > omission or is this by design ? That's by design. The install stores a default make.conf file in /etc/defaults/make.conf . Local changes should go in a new file named /etc/make.conf . The idea being that if you upgrade later, the upgrade will modify /etc/defaults/make.conf leaving your local changes intact. (Of course there's no guarantee that the local changes will still work after an upgrade, but at least they won't be overwritten.) There are a number of files in /etc/defaults -- it's worth checking that ou= t. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:41:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4065516A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:41:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C460B43D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:41:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so334050wra for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:41:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lrbjLeEvNcq8PeLwI7sbT8NHI1pkcPAUfP6GatMhns8rbwBpH2maicobpI8GRbZHL3ee4pBDPUNt7xwbdwvrpquDvKXyXPnKxeMGbBJYzaxyZmnCP2UOvJMmWPzY3YhLp43JxgU5kXeqoD7d3aETde7hW1DZ18nTZwb8YpuVnPg= Received: by 10.65.11.9 with SMTP id o9mr5602074qbi; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.253.2 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:35:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990511071035l29ad1ddeq28086fc3543077c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:35:05 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: "Michael C. Shultz" In-Reply-To: <200511070826.33840.ringworm01@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1131325173.3160.5.camel@localhost> <54db43990511070819g2d5d5bfchf507626a33c921f2@mail.gmail.com> <200511070823.01175.ringworm01@gmail.com> <200511070826.33840.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD questions , Dave Webster Subject: Re: filesystem full error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:41:17 -0000 On 11/7/05, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > He should link /var/tmp to /usr/tmp also you think? > > -Mike > > "Instead", not "also". I thought that's what you had told him to try, but I misread it. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:45:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5B216A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6119B43D6D for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EZBwl-0003AO-JP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:42:23 +0100 Received: from r5k101.chello.upc.cz ([86.49.10.101]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:42:23 +0100 Received: from martinkov by r5k101.chello.upc.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:42:23 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:40:28 +0100 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <436F6B80.6010709@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r5k101.chello.upc.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050925 X-Accept-Language: sk, cs, en-gb, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <436F6B80.6010709@gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: boot manager linux/bsd dual boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:45:20 -0000 John Cox wrote: > I am preparing for a freeBSD install on my laptop with XP and Fedora. I > am familiar with Grub and would like to use that to boot freeBSD. Can > someone point me to an example of a grub.conf (menu.lst) entry that will > work? > Or > How do I configure boot manager to boot Fedora? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > # For booting FreeBSD title FreeBSD 5 root (hd0,2,a) kernel /boot/loader From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:50:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013AE16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:50:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E219543D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:50:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 55420 invoked by uid 0); 7 Nov 2005 18:50:14 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 18:50:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA7Ia1qg001883; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:36:01 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Message-ID: <436F9E91.3000401@alphaque.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:36:01 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051026 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. W. Ballantine" References: <200511071825.jA7IPQj03230@akiva.homer.att.com> In-Reply-To: <200511071825.jA7IPQj03230@akiva.homer.att.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5-STABLE to 6-RELEASE upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:50:17 -0000 On 11/08/05 02:25 J. W. Ballantine said the following: > and did a cvsup to get the new bits. I then ran a make world; > make buildkernel; and then a make installkernel. This steps fails with: you should be using buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, reboot, installworld with a couple of mergemasters thrown in there. see /usr/src/UPDATING for the correct sequence. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:53:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C9416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:53:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwl@io.dk) Received: from user7.cybercity.dk (user7.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258BB43D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:53:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwl@io.dk) Received: from webmail.cybercity.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by user7.cybercity.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jA7IrK8I057015 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:53:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jwl@io.dk) From: jwl@io.dk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:53:20 +0100 Message-Id: <20051107185226.M70218@io.dk> X-Mailer: Cybercity Webmail 2.21 20031110 X-OriginatingIP: 85.81.32.111 (dsl202203@vip.cybercity.dk) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: enable smp / hyperthreading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:53:23 -0000 Hi I've just installed 6.0-RELASE and am trying to get SMP to work (I have af Pentium 4 with HT). So I've compiled the kernel with 'options SMP' and according to dmesg the two CPUs are found: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 But I'm not sure that both are enabled, because at this is at the end of dmesg and I dont see the other CPU being enabled somewhere: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! According to 'sysctl -a' there are 2 CPUs, but only 1 active and SMP doesnt seem to be disabled: kern.smp.cpus: 2 kern.smp.disabled: 0 kern.smp.active: 1 So I thought that it might help to but 'kern.smp.active=2' in /boot/loader.conf, but after a reboot it is back to 1 again. What am I missing here? regards, Jeppe Larsen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 18:59:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC8716A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:59:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C0DF43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:59:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 55520 invoked by uid 0); 7 Nov 2005 18:59:41 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 18:59:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA7IsIM7032824; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:54:18 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Message-ID: <436FA2DA.3040305@alphaque.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:54:18 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051026 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Kirchner References: <20051107131443.E26113@prime.gushi.org> <436F9E0F.5040800@alphaque.com> <35c231bf0511071040p5d47ef02td66f7596a200311b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <35c231bf0511071040p5d47ef02td66f7596a200311b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: build ports without X -- make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:59:44 -0000 On 11/08/05 02:40 David Kirchner said the following: > That's by design. The install stores a default make.conf file in > /etc/defaults/make.conf . Local changes should go in a new file named i do know about /etc/default/make.conf, and that's missing as well. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:02:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D7216A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:02:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA1B43D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:02:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-43-91.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.43.91]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id jA7J1xWY021324 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:01:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000f01c5e3cc$af28d710$0900a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:54:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: relocating /tmp to other media X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:02:04 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to run bitdefender on a 5.4 system. It works fine up until / fills up, i'm having it scan a 40 gb smb mounted windows share and when / fills specifically /tmp bitdefender cores out. My / filesystem on this box is i believe either 130mb or 256mb, and this issue does not occur when scanning a 20 gb drive. I was wondering if it's possible to relocate /tmp to other media ramdisk, tmpfs, or the like? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:03:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADED16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:03:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1297A43D6E for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:03:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.253.228] ([82.41.253.228]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:04:10 +0000 Message-ID: <436FA4F0.3060102@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:03:12 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Micah References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> <20051107100935.31771357.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20051107102617.3abfd2c5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <436F896B.2040404@dial.pipex.com> <436F8E2E.802@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <436F8E2E.802@ywave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2005 19:04:10.0568 (UTC) FILETIME=[091E5C80:01C5E3CE] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:03:31 -0000 Micah wrote: > I'm really beginning to doubt it's the PSU. Why? I cannot get the > output voltage to drop no matter what load I throw at it. I plugged > in four additional hard drives and ran a system stress test and still > the voltages remained rock steady at the values I stated earlier. I > ran it for an hours with the high-low monitor on a Fluke multimeter. > The +5 stayed near 5.1 with 5.08 as the bottom, and the +12 stayed > near 11.89 with 11.84 as the minimum. I even had one of the "random > segfaults" and the +12 voltage never dropped below 11.84. I'm not > sure how I can get the load any higher without using resistors which > most certainly does not simulate the load I'm generating while compiling. > > That leaves memory, CPU or mobo. I ran memtest86+ and it reported no > errors. I'll run it again for an extended period of time while I'm at > school to see if it reports anything. That leaves CPU and mobo. > Anyone got any ideas how to test those? The only system test I can > run that does report an error is Lucifer 1.0 (on the ultimate boot > cd). The mprime test and cpuburn do not find any errors. The usual advice is to run memtest86 overnight, but I'm not convinced it will find a fault related to either temperature or load, since memtest seems to cause neither. Still, worth a try. When I was arsing around with overclocking, I could reliably crash the machine (IIRC) like this: run cpu burn run mprime (or was it a pi generator? can't recall now...) wait for temp to hit max kill cpuburn! wait < 5 mins for either machine to crash or prime/pi test to have error I was fairly convinced at the time that it was the memory which didn't cope. This is possibly not far off what happens in a big series of stressful compiles. As for diagnosing faults, you may be down to replacing components one at a time and seeing if it makes a difference. That's easier when the machine crashes quickly, so if you can find something which reliably crashes it, that's good. If you have >1 memory stick and the machine will run with a single stick, try each stick in turn. You could also try deliberately under-performing the memory and see if that makes it reliable. Was the memory you go on the compatibility list for the mobo? Hope that helps, --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:04:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE2B16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwb@homer.att.com) Received: from mail131.messagelabs.com (mail131.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CAC543D95 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:04:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwb@homer.att.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: jwb@homer.att.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-131.messagelabs.com!1131390259!12694260!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.9.1; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [134.24.146.4] Received: (qmail 13255 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 19:04:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ulysses.homer.att.com) (134.24.146.4) by server-10.tower-131.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 19:04:19 -0000 Received: from akiva.homer.att.com (akiva.homer.att.com [135.205.212.39]) by ulysses.homer.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16494; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:04:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from akiva.homer.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by akiva.homer.att.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id jA7J4Ij03282; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:04:18 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200511071904.jA7J4Ij03282@akiva.homer.att.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Dinesh Nair In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:36:01 +0800." <436F9E91.3000401@alphaque.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:04:16 -0500 From: "J. W. Ballantine" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5-STABLE to 6-RELEASE upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:04:30 -0000 Sorry if I wasn't totally percise, but that is what I am doing the make world is really a build makeworld, and the failure is actually during the mergemaster phase of the installkernel. It's the same script I've been using to rebuild the system for a while. Jim ---------- In Response to your message ------------- > Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:36:01 +0800 > To: "J. W. Ballantine" > From: Dinesh Nair > Subject: Re: 5-STABLE to 6-RELEASE upgrade > > > > On 11/08/05 02:25 J. W. Ballantine said the following: > > and did a cvsup to get the new bits. I then ran a make world; > > make buildkernel; and then a make installkernel. This steps fails with: > > you should be using buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, reboot, > installworld with a couple of mergemasters thrown in there. see > /usr/src/UPDATING for the correct sequence. > > -- > Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." > dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ > +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ > | for a in past present future; do | > | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | > | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | > | done; done | > +=========================================================================+ > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:04:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D42A16A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:04:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB0143D96 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:04:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.253.228] ([82.41.253.228]) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:05:12 +0000 Message-ID: <436FA531.1060802@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:04:17 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. W. Ballantine" References: <200511071825.jA7IPQj03230@akiva.homer.att.com> <436F9E91.3000401@alphaque.com> In-Reply-To: <436F9E91.3000401@alphaque.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2005 19:05:13.0183 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E70A6F0:01C5E3CE] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5-STABLE to 6-RELEASE upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:04:41 -0000 Dinesh Nair wrote: > > > On 11/08/05 02:25 J. W. Ballantine said the following: > >> and did a cvsup to get the new bits. I then ran a make world; >> make buildkernel; and then a make installkernel. This steps fails with: > > > you should be using buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, reboot, > installworld with a couple of mergemasters thrown in there. see > /usr/src/UPDATING for the correct sequence. > And don't forget to delete everything under /usr/obj first. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:06:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B59516A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3D843DA8 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:05:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7J5R76010492; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:05:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D4238B822; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:05:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:05:24 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: jwl@io.dk Message-ID: <20051107190524.GA77411@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: jwl@io.dk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051107185226.M70218@io.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051107185226.M70218@io.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: enable smp / hyperthreading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:06:02 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:53:20PM +0100, jwl@io.dk wrote: > Hi >=20 > I've just installed 6.0-RELASE and am trying to get SMP to work (I have af > Pentium 4 with HT). So I've compiled the kernel with 'options SMP' and > according to dmesg the two CPUs are found: >=20 > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 >=20 > But I'm not sure that both are enabled, because at this is at the end of > dmesg and I dont see the other CPU being enabled somewhere: >=20 > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! I think it is referring to the Auxiliary Processor (AP), because the BSP (don't know what that stands for, though) is obviously already active. =20 > According to 'sysctl -a' there are 2 CPUs, but only 1 active and SMP > doesnt seem to be disabled: >=20 > kern.smp.cpus: 2 > kern.smp.disabled: 0 > kern.smp.active: 1 sysctl -d kern.smp.active kern.smp.active: Number of Auxillary Processors (APs) that were successfully started This is the number of _extra_ CPUs, which chould be 1. =20 Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDb6V0EnfvsMMhpyURAiIOAJ46++2hEBg8rESZSe04PMY2Nkaa9ACfZwHo BsBsfqCDA96EtFw5Pky12Ok= =bqQ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:08:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6FF16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:08:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BED43D66 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:08:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 77242 invoked by uid 89); 8 Nov 2005 06:08:07 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 77209, pid: 77219, t: 1.4819s scanners: clamav: 0.86.1/m:33/d:984 spam: 3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.34?) (213.202.158.152) by 0 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 06:08:05 +1100 In-Reply-To: <200511051738.44213.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <5B80465E-1AC8-4819-A304-69529C82DA52@redry.net> <200511051713.59193.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <103350BD-B338-42EA-B0E2-2BA4BAFC00A4@redry.net> <200511051738.44213.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:08:03 +0000 To: RW X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update kde X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:08:09 -0000 On 5 Nov 2005, at 17:38, RW wrote: > On Saturday 05 November 2005 17:27, eoghan wrote: >> On 5 Nov 2005, at 17:13, RW wrote: >> Id use the port. But I have to remove kde3 first right? > > Well, you were talking about using pkg_add which installs binary > packages, > rather than building a port. > > In either case, using portupgrade avoids manual deletion. Thanks... Ive done a portupgrade... From the freebsd.kde.org. Would anyone whos done a: portupgrade -rR kde let me know how long it takes? Im running nearly 2 days here... 1mbs broadband connection. Admittedly config screens were ignored due to sleep... :) Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:08:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583C716A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:08:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C68C43D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA7J8YBH013409; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:08:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 449BFB822; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:08:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:08:34 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Dave Message-ID: <20051107190834.GB77411@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Dave , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000f01c5e3cc$af28d710$0900a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000f01c5e3cc$af28d710$0900a8c0@satellite> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: relocating /tmp to other media X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:08:37 -0000 --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:54:29PM -0500, Dave wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to run bitdefender on a 5.4 system. It works fine up until = /=20 > fills up, i'm having it scan a 40 gb smb mounted windows share and when /= =20 > fills specifically /tmp bitdefender cores out. My / filesystem on this bo= x=20 > is i believe either 130mb or 256mb, and this issue does not occur when=20 > scanning a 20 gb drive. I was wondering if it's possible to relocate /tmp= =20 > to other media ramdisk, tmpfs, or the like? If you have a partition with enough space (e.g. /usr); Create a directory /usr/tmp. Drop into single user mode and move everything from /tmp to /usr/tmp. Remove /tmp, and create a symlink /tmp to /usr/tmp. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDb6YyEnfvsMMhpyURAh/HAKCe4mjgLEJL0dVX4P/RYrhrGwv9PACdEVxj VQ8o+sii6567MA86HXFQ/s8= =w34b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:12:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A5016A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:12:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED67343D73 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:12:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i11so771765wra for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:12:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Og78aIwC8dtUkUHRrNOV5CLsUl7vz8eHuA9AS0Rkmk0pqYS7cWqUnPKwopSH0c9nihrHPRpmwDt+d46DlWGitmjodGCOiaVIkzIKEjznj1ZmXXwxgeNpdk/NO4Dryog71jn54NJm+4ObWndw5w6v6CiZvZadzzvWTJVMFd00XKM= Received: by 10.65.215.5 with SMTP id s5mr5645109qbq; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:12:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.61.15 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:12:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <59adc1a0511071112y3818400ag@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:12:09 +0200 From: Dimitar Vasilev To: Dave , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051107190834.GB77411@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <000f01c5e3cc$af28d710$0900a8c0@satellite> <20051107190834.GB77411@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Cc: Subject: Re: relocating /tmp to other media X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:12:10 -0000 MjAwNS8xMS83LCBSb2xhbmQgU21pdGggPHJzbWl0aEB4czRhbGwubmw+Ogo+IE9uIE1vbiwgTm92 IDA3LCAyMDA1IGF0IDAxOjU0OjI5UE0gLTA1MDAsIERhdmUgd3JvdGU6Cj4gPiBIZWxsbywKPiA+ ICAgIEknbSB0cnlpbmcgdG8gcnVuIGJpdGRlZmVuZGVyIG9uIGEgNS40IHN5c3RlbS4gSXQgd29y a3MgZmluZSB1cCB1bnRpbCAvCj4gPiBmaWxscyB1cCwgaSdtIGhhdmluZyBpdCBzY2FuIGEgNDAg Z2Igc21iIG1vdW50ZWQgd2luZG93cyBzaGFyZSBhbmQgd2hlbiAvCj4gPiBmaWxscyBzcGVjaWZp Y2FsbHkgL3RtcCBiaXRkZWZlbmRlciBjb3JlcyBvdXQuIE15IC8gZmlsZXN5c3RlbSBvbiB0aGlz IGJveAo+ID4gaXMgaSBiZWxpZXZlIGVpdGhlciAxMzBtYiBvciAyNTZtYiwgYW5kIHRoaXMgaXNz dWUgZG9lcyBub3Qgb2NjdXIgd2hlbgo+ID4gc2Nhbm5pbmcgYSAyMCBnYiBkcml2ZS4gSSB3YXMg d29uZGVyaW5nIGlmIGl0J3MgcG9zc2libGUgdG8gcmVsb2NhdGUgL3RtcAo+ID4gdG8gb3RoZXIg bWVkaWEgcmFtZGlzaywgdG1wZnMsIG9yIHRoZSBsaWtlPwo+Cj4gSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgYSBwYXJ0 aXRpb24gd2l0aCBlbm91Z2ggc3BhY2UgKGUuZy4gL3Vzcik7IENyZWF0ZSBhCj4gZGlyZWN0b3J5 IC91c3IvdG1wLiBEcm9wIGludG8gc2luZ2xlIHVzZXIgbW9kZSBhbmQgbW92ZSBldmVyeXRoaW5n IGZyb20KPiAvdG1wIHRvIC91c3IvdG1wLiBSZW1vdmUgL3RtcCwgYW5kIGNyZWF0ZSBhIHN5bWxp bmsgL3RtcCB0byAvdXNyL3RtcC4KPgo+IFJvbGFuZAo+IC0tCj4gUi5GLlNtaXRoIChodHRwOi8v d3d3LnhzNGFsbC5ubC9+cnNtaXRoLykgUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgZS1tYWlsIGFzIHBsYWluIHRleHQu Cj4gcHVibGljIGtleTogaHR0cDovL3d3dy54czRhbGwubmwvfnJzbWl0aC9wdWJrZXkudHh0Cklm IHlvdSBoYXZlIGVub3VnaCBSQU0sIHRyeSBhbHNvIG1lbWZzIGZvciB0bXAuCkhvd2V2ZXIgYmV3 YXJlIG9mIHppcGJvbWJzIDstKQoKLS0KtNjc2OLq4CCy0OHY29XSCkRpbWl0YXIgVmFzc2lsZXYK CkdudVBHIGtleSBJRDogMHg0QjhEQjUyNQpLZXlzZXJ2ZXI6IHBncC5taXQuZWR1CktleSBmaW5n ZXJwcmludDogRDg4QSAzQjkyIERFRDUgOTE3RSAzNDFFIEQ2MkYgOEM1MSA1RkM0IDRCOEQgQjUy NQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:13:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D145916A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:13:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (fw1.wmptl.com [216.8.159.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5DD43D5D for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:13:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA7JDj5X031446; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:13:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <436FA736.7090503@wmptl.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:12:54 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eoghan References: <5B80465E-1AC8-4819-A304-69529C82DA52@redry.net> <200511051713.59193.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <103350BD-B338-42EA-B0E2-2BA4BAFC00A4@redry.net> <200511051738.44213.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.111 () RATWR10_MESSID X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update kde X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:13:42 -0000 depends on CPU, ram, I/O speed... have had systems which took a few days to compile kde and all it's dependancies, have had others take less than an hour... depends entirely on the machine speed - mostly I/O and CPU really. eoghan wrote: > On 5 Nov 2005, at 17:38, RW wrote: > >> On Saturday 05 November 2005 17:27, eoghan wrote: >> >>> On 5 Nov 2005, at 17:13, RW wrote: >>> Id use the port. But I have to remove kde3 first right? >> >> >> Well, you were talking about using pkg_add which installs binary >> packages, >> rather than building a port. >> >> In either case, using portupgrade avoids manual deletion. > > > Thanks... Ive done a portupgrade... > From the freebsd.kde.org. Would anyone whos done a: > portupgrade -rR kde > let me know how long it takes? Im running nearly 2 days here... 1mbs > broadband connection. > Admittedly config screens were ignored due to sleep... :) > Eoghan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:20:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6606B16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:20:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2724543D77 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:20:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7539C388FAE for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:20:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:20:02 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <7F66C37EB58B0B65025105CF@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> References: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Antivir for mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:20:03 -0000 --On Monday, November 07, 2005 09:19:24 +0100 Fatman wrote: > I'm doubting about to install CLAM or DR.WEB antivir in the mail server. > > What do you advise to me? > We've been using ClamAV and McAfee side by side on our gateway for some time now, and ClamAV is a tenth of a percent less effective than McAfee. Both catch over 99% of what hits the server. (I keep running stats on all that stuff.) You can feel very confident that you are catching almost all the viruses running Clam AV. That said, it never hurts to run two or more scanners, depending upon your cpu and memory capabilities. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:26:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706FD16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:26:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E103E43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:26:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 90048 invoked by uid 89); 8 Nov 2005 06:26:28 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 89992, pid: 90006, t: 3.7363s scanners: clamav: 0.86.1/m:33/d:984 spam: 3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.34?) (213.202.158.152) by 0 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 06:26:24 +1100 In-Reply-To: <436FA736.7090503@wmptl.com> References: <5B80465E-1AC8-4819-A304-69529C82DA52@redry.net> <200511051713.59193.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <103350BD-B338-42EA-B0E2-2BA4BAFC00A4@redry.net> <200511051738.44213.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <436FA736.7090503@wmptl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <4A3387A4-FEE9-4156-B98A-D7FC8EB609CC@redry.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:26:22 +0000 To: Nathan Vidican X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update kde X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:26:29 -0000 On 7 Nov 2005, at 19:12, Nathan Vidican wrote: > depends on CPU, ram, I/O speed... have had systems which took a few > days to compile kde and all it's dependancies, have had others take > less than an hour... depends entirely on the machine speed - mostly > I/O and CPU really. Thanks... Well its a pentium 4 with ~700MB RAM... not sure about the CPU but its not that old, perhaps 3 years or so... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:32:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0C816A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:32:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92.asp.att.net [204.127.203.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0BC43D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:32:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-7-29.client.mchsi.com[12.216.7.29]) by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with SMTP id <20051107193216m920066jute>; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:32:17 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:32:16 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: Jeffrey Ellis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20051107132817.L3084@grond.sourballs.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:32:18 -0000 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > Well, at least I know it can do it now. The problem -- as usual for a newbie > -- is that I haven't got the vaguest understanding of what I just read. The > field part I think I get, but how would I use the first character? I guess > I'm basically too stupid to get these kind of instructions -- maybe just one > example for the use of each option included in man pages would help? Here's a completely different approach. I ran into this exact problem often enough that I wrote a small Perl script to handle it: #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use File::Find (); # for the convenience of &wanted calls, including -eval statements: use vars qw/*name/; *name = *File::Find::name; (@ARGV) or usage(); my (%files, $tString, $reverse); $reverse = 1 if ($ARGV[1] =~ /r.*/); # Traverse desired filesystems File::Find::find(\&wanted, $ARGV[0]); # sort %files by mod. time, print. if ($ARGV[1] =~ /r.*/) { foreach my $f (sort { $files{$b} <=> $files{$a} } keys %files) { # chop off day of week ($tString = scalar localtime($files{$f})) =~ s/\w* //; print $tString, "\t",$f,"\n"; } } else { foreach my $f (sort { $files{$a} <=> $files{$b} } keys %files) { # chop off day of week ($tString = scalar localtime($files{$f})) =~ s/\w* //; print $tString, "\t",$f,"\n"; } } exit; sub wanted { my (@fstat); # put the filename and mod. time into %files ((@fstat) = lstat($_)) && -f _ && ($files{$name} = $fstat[9]); } sub usage { print "\n", "Usage: $0 (directory) [reverse]\n", " examines all files in (directory) and all its subdirectories,\n", " sorts by date, and returns the sorted list, earliest first.\n", " If 'reverse' is specified, files are sorted earliest last.\n\n"; exit; } -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 19:43:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD79B16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:43:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp1.linkline.com (smtp1.linkline.com [66.59.235.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4080143D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:43:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp1.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035F89D0BA; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:43:21 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:43:23 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: David Fleck , Jeffrey Ellis Message-ID: Thread-Topic: How to sort find results Thread-Index: AcXj04NGwYvh1k/GEdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <20051107132817.L3084@grond.sourballs.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:43:25 -0000 Hi, David-- Thank you. Wow. That looks great... Um... Can you tell me how to run it? All My Best, Jeffrey on 11/7/05 11:32 AM, David Fleck at david.fleck@mchsi.com wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: >> Well, at least I know it can do it now. The problem -- as usual for a newbie >> -- is that I haven't got the vaguest understanding of what I just read. The >> field part I think I get, but how would I use the first character? I guess >> I'm basically too stupid to get these kind of instructions -- maybe just one >> example for the use of each option included in man pages would help? > > Here's a completely different approach. I ran into this exact problem > often enough that I wrote a small Perl script to handle it: > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > use strict; > use File::Find (); > > # for the convenience of &wanted calls, including -eval statements: > use vars qw/*name/; > *name = *File::Find::name; > > (@ARGV) or usage(); > > my (%files, $tString, $reverse); > > $reverse = 1 if ($ARGV[1] =~ /r.*/); > > # Traverse desired filesystems > File::Find::find(\&wanted, $ARGV[0]); > > # sort %files by mod. time, print. > if ($ARGV[1] =~ /r.*/) { > foreach my $f (sort { $files{$b} <=> $files{$a} } keys %files) { > # chop off day of week > ($tString = scalar localtime($files{$f})) =~ s/\w* //; > print $tString, "\t",$f,"\n"; > } > } else { > foreach my $f (sort { $files{$a} <=> $files{$b} } keys %files) { > # chop off day of week > ($tString = scalar localtime($files{$f})) =~ s/\w* //; > print $tString, "\t",$f,"\n"; > } > } > exit; > > > sub wanted { > my (@fstat); > # put the filename and mod. time into %files > ((@fstat) = lstat($_)) && -f _ && ($files{$name} = $fstat[9]); > } > > sub usage { > print "\n", > "Usage: $0 (directory) [reverse]\n", > " examines all files in (directory) and all its subdirectories,\n", > " sorts by date, and returns the sorted list, earliest first.\n", > " If 'reverse' is specified, files are sorted earliest last.\n\n"; > exit; > } > > > -- > David Fleck > david.fleck@mchsi.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 20:03:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9940B16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:03:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.198.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352C243D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:03:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20051107200349014007a40te>; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:03:50 +0000 Message-ID: <436F5EC3.4020606@computer.org> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:03:47 +0000 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <20051106122317.46c1d99d.dick@nagual.st> <20051107113840.z3r0h3nm8cgkc8kk@netchild.homeip.net> <20051107170210.GA7324@lothlorien.nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20051107170210.GA7324@lothlorien.nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: linux-glib2 unavailable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:03:52 -0000 Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 07 Nov Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >>dick hoogendijk wrote: >> >> >>>A lot of linux related ports won't install on my fbsd-6.0 system due >>>to the following error: >>> >>>fetch: >>>ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/rpm/glib2-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm: >>>File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Couldn't fetch >>>it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into >>>/usr/ports/distfiles/rpm and try again. *** Error code 1 >> >>http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/devel.html#linux-glib2 >>says the distfile is available (not from FreeBSD.org...). So "make >>fetch" in the port directory should fetch it... > > > I thanked you already, but alas, too soon ;-/ > The file should be fetchable from http://gtk.org.ok > This is a non-existant address. > FWIW... I found at least one copy here ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/ASPLinux/i386/RPMS.9/glib2-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 20:24:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABD416A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:24:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44FE43D60 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:24:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-7-29.client.mchsi.com[12.216.7.29]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with SMTP id <20051107202410m9100dvt79e>; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:24:10 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:24:10 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: Jeffrey Ellis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20051107140553.U3084@grond.sourballs.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:24:13 -0000 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > Hi, David-- > > Thank you. > > Wow. That looks great... > > Um... Can you tell me how to run it? Assuming you've saved everything from '#!/usr/bin/perl' to the final '}', inclusive, to a file, name the file something, like 'date_sort'. Then chmod +x date_sort ./date_sort /directory/to/sort I use this primarily on directory hierarchies of regular files, so I'm not guaranteeing what will happen if you use it on directories that contain other sorts of files. -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 20:47:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84C016A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:47:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from relay0.av-mx.com (relay0.av-mx.com [137.118.16.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E8B43D49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) X-Virus-Scan-Time: 0 Received: from [137.118.16.61] (HELO mx0.av-mx.com) by relay0.av-mx.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 47064061 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:47:10 -0500 Received: (qmail 31263 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 20:47:09 -0000 Received: from webx1.neonova.net (137.118.60.140) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 20:47:09 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 137.118.60.140 X-CLIENT-HOST: webx1.neonova.net Received: (from nobody@localhost) by webX1.neonova.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id jA7Kl8709966; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:47:08 -0500 Received: from 128.208.250.149 (SquirrelMail authenticated user micahjon@ywave.com) by webx1.neonova.net with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:47:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1217.128.208.250.149.1131396428.squirrel@webx1.neonova.net> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:47:08 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael Lieske" To: In-Reply-To: <20051107094015.R55967@liam.billschoolcraft.com> References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> <20051107100935.31771357.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20051107102617.3abfd2c5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <436F896B.2040404@dial.pipex.com> <436F8E2E.802@ywave.com> <20051107094015.R55967@liam.billschoolcraft.com> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: micahjon@ywave.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:47:14 -0000 > At Mon, 7 Nov 2005 it looks like Micah composed: > >> Alex Zbyslaw wrote: >>> Bill Moran wrote: >>> >>>> Bill Moran wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Micah wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I'm running the i386 version of FreeBSD with 1gb ram. Didn't >>>>>> think to check this before, but I'm getting ~112-113 volts into >>>>>> the PSU from the surge strip. I'm probably going to get a new >>>>>> PSU today. The parts store has a couple of 400 watters in the >>>>>> $50 range (a fortron and a thermaltake). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheap power supplies are a near guarantee that your computer will >>>>> be unstable. Unfortunately, $cheap doesn't always == quality >>>>> cheap. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I recommend the more recent one as a guage for what manufacturers >>>> you can trust. Frankly, if you're only spending $50 on a 400W, >>>> you're probably getting a piece of junk - although Fortron has been >>>> rating well in Tom's tests. >>>> >>> A PSU actually capable of 350W *ought* to have done you fine, but >>> many cheap PSUs, as Bill says, just don't cut it. I'd personally >>> recommend a Seasonic, which won't be cheap, but will be quiet and >>> reliable if mine is anything to go by. Antec also seem to have a >>> reasonable rep. >>> >>> There's a nice wattage claculator here: >>> http://www.jscustompcs.com/power_supply/Power_Supply_Calculator.php? >>> >>> --Alex >> >> Thanks for the link. I actually used that calculator when I pieced >> this machine together. >> >> I'm really beginning to doubt it's the PSU. Why? I cannot get the >> output voltage to drop no matter what load I throw at it. I plugged >> in four additional hard drives and ran a system stress test and still >> the voltages remained rock steady at the values I stated earlier. I >> ran it for an hours with the high-low monitor on a Fluke multimeter. >> The +5 stayed near 5.1 with 5.08 as the bottom, and the +12 stayed >> near 11.89 with 11.84 as the minimum. I even had one of the "random >> segfaults" and the +12 voltage never dropped below 11.84. I'm not >> sure how I can get the load any higher without using resistors which >> most certainly does not simulate the load I'm generating while >> compiling. > > Hello, > > How were you using the Fluke meter to test amperage? I was not > aware that it would work with a ground line embedded inside the > power cable? > > I currently have a Fluke-T5-600 and I'm curious about the above > test. http://www.tequipment.net/FlukeT5-600VoltageTester.html > > Thanks I wasn't checking amps because everything I've read says that a bad supply will show voltage fluctuations. I just stuck the probes into available +5 and +12 lines (seperate tests) and let it sit in min/max mode for a while. Later, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 21:16:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5351516A429 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:16:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E434043D6A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:16:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: from frankie.konav201.local (cpe-66-8-187-40.hawaii.res.rr.com [66.8.187.40]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id jA7LGKmI022234; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:16:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:16:19 -1000 From: Robert Marella To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20051107111619.108a3ae3@frankie.konav201.local> In-Reply-To: <20051107190524.GA77411@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20051107185226.M70218@io.dk> <20051107190524.GA77411@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.99 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jwl@io.dk Subject: Re: enable smp / hyperthreading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:16:27 -0000 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:05:24 +0100 Roland Smith wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:53:20PM +0100, jwl@io.dk wrote: > > Hi > > > > I've just installed 6.0-RELASE and am trying to get SMP to work (I > > have af Pentium 4 with HT). So I've compiled the kernel with > > 'options SMP' and according to dmesg the two CPUs are found: > > > > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > > > > But I'm not sure that both are enabled, because at this is at the > > end of dmesg and I dont see the other CPU being enabled somewhere: > > > > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > > I think it is referring to the Auxiliary Processor (AP), because the > BSP (don't know what that stands for, though) is obviously already > active. > > According to 'sysctl -a' there are 2 CPUs, but only 1 active and SMP > > doesnt seem to be disabled: > > > > kern.smp.cpus: 2 > > kern.smp.disabled: 0 > > kern.smp.active: 1 > > sysctl -d kern.smp.active > kern.smp.active: Number of Auxillary Processors (APs) that were > successfully started > > This is the number of _extra_ CPUs, which chould be 1. > > Roland If hyperthreading is working the ouput of 'top' should have a C column and will show either a 0 or a 1. AFAIK HTT is still disabled because of a security risk. See: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc If you do not believe you are at risk, there is a work around included in the above site. YMMV. I have been known to be wrong before. :-) Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 21:21:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4819C16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:21:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luktheluckyboy@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8BB43D76 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:21:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luktheluckyboy@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o1so429206nzf for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:21:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=gyaz2sU6rqBYD/hiEAGw6a4UImEPqbhw3qstonX9No4aTQ2K5pgStpujsai+sBMt3XW8xmKmiOCtlAtcx9TkuXMgQCKo7uxgoSOl26FSMlZwfYhtOUiM0w01vXFMglaIZn1oRM/ktQKzvnwxCl4yA905DSIvwqr0UV3v1o2LdgE= Received: by 10.65.93.3 with SMTP id v3mr5820348qbl; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:21:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.96.18 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:21:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7b1df2440511071321g5967fd73g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:21:15 +0100 From: Luk van den Borne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: gtk2 themes in xfce4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:21:18 -0000 Hello, Just a quick question: I've recently installed gtk2-switch-theme, in order to set a theme for firefox while working in e17. But when I got back to xfce4, I am unable to change the theme in the xfce4 control center. Only the colors change accordingly, but the widgets remain from the theme that I set in gtk2-theme-switch. Does anyone know how to give control back to xfce4? Btw if this is not the right list, please tell me. Luk van den Borne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 21:22:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8CE16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:22:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D38F43D80 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:21:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 32372 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 21:21:57 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2005 21:21:57 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C479C28444; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:21:56 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Olivier Nicole References: <200511071024.jA7AOAKl071986@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Nov 2005 16:21:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200511071024.jA7AOAKl071986@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Message-ID: <447jbkm9vv.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 32 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow file transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:22:20 -0000 Olivier Nicole writes: > I am suffering from slow file transfer on a FreeBSD machine. > > The set-up is as follow: > > Router1 is connected to Router2 that is connected to sFTP server > > Router1 and Router2 are the same motherboard, same BIOS configuration, > same CPU, both have same type hard disk (Seagate ATA 10 and 20 GB) and > both are running the same version of freeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p16 with the > same softwares (Zebra and xorp basically). > > Router2 has 128MB ram while Router1 has only 64MB. > > Both machine load are close to 0.00 > > When I do a file transfer from Router1 to sFTP server (through > Router2) I get a transfer rate of 511 KB/s. > > When I do a file transfer from Router2 to sFTP server (one less hop) I > can only get 87 KB/s. > > The transfer rates remains the same all along the day (this is not due > at a specific traffic high load at the time I gathered data). > > While the setup has not changed for months, the slowness is very recent. > > I must admitthat I am clueless about what could be the reason and help > would be greatly appreciated. Could be a duplex mismatch. Look for collision statistics. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 21:24:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A36516A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:24:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from relay0.av-mx.com (relay2.av-mx.com [137.118.16.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E61143D8A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:23:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) X-Virus-Scan-Time: 0 Received: from [137.118.16.62] (HELO mx1.av-mx.com) by relay0.av-mx.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 49788622 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:23:23 -0500 Received: (qmail 9359 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 21:23:23 -0000 Received: from webx1.neonova.net (137.118.60.140) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 21:23:23 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 137.118.60.140 X-CLIENT-HOST: webx1.neonova.net Received: (from nobody@localhost) by webX1.neonova.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id jA7LNMA12956; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:23:22 -0500 Received: from 128.208.250.149 (SquirrelMail authenticated user micahjon@ywave.com) by webx1.neonova.net with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:23:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1638.128.208.250.149.1131398602.squirrel@webx1.neonova.net> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:23:22 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael Lieske" To: In-Reply-To: <436FA4F0.3060102@dial.pipex.com> References: <436E739E.8020605@ywave.com> <436E7599.9090003@cs.earlham.edu> <436E7D4E.6080707@ywave.com> <436E9DF0.1080408@ywave.com> <436F1779.7090807@u.washington.edu> <436F6B5F.9000304@ywave.com> <20051107100935.31771357.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20051107102617.3abfd2c5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <436F896B.2040404@dial.pipex.com> <436F8E2E.802@ywave.com> <436FA4F0.3060102@dial.pipex.com> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: micahjon@ywave.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:24:02 -0000 > Micah wrote: > >> I'm really beginning to doubt it's the PSU. Why? I cannot get the >> output voltage to drop no matter what load I throw at it. I plugged >> in four additional hard drives and ran a system stress test and still >> the voltages remained rock steady at the values I stated earlier. I >> ran it for an hours with the high-low monitor on a Fluke multimeter. >> The +5 stayed near 5.1 with 5.08 as the bottom, and the +12 stayed >> near 11.89 with 11.84 as the minimum. I even had one of the "random >> segfaults" and the +12 voltage never dropped below 11.84. I'm not >> sure how I can get the load any higher without using resistors which >> most certainly does not simulate the load I'm generating while >> compiling. >> >> That leaves memory, CPU or mobo. I ran memtest86+ and it reported no >> errors. I'll run it again for an extended period of time while I'm at >> school to see if it reports anything. That leaves CPU and mobo. >> Anyone got any ideas how to test those? The only system test I can >> run that does report an error is Lucifer 1.0 (on the ultimate boot >> cd). The mprime test and cpuburn do not find any errors. > > The usual advice is to run memtest86 overnight, but I'm not convinced it > will find a fault related to either temperature or load, since memtest > seems to cause neither. Still, worth a try. > > When I was arsing around with overclocking, I could reliably crash the > machine (IIRC) like this: > run cpu burn > run mprime (or was it a pi generator? can't recall now...) > wait for temp to hit max > kill cpuburn! > wait < 5 mins for either machine to crash or prime/pi test to have > error > > I was fairly convinced at the time that it was the memory which didn't > cope. This is possibly not far off what happens in a big series of > stressful compiles. > > As for diagnosing faults, you may be down to replacing components one at > a time and seeing if it makes a difference. That's easier when the > machine crashes quickly, so if you can find something which reliably > crashes it, that's good. If you have >1 memory stick and the machine > will run with a single stick, try each stick in turn. You could also > try deliberately under-performing the memory and see if that makes it > reliable. Was the memory you go on the compatibility list for the mobo? > > Hope that helps, > > --Alex Unfortunately I cannot reliably reproduce it. If I remember correctly the memmory was on the compatibility list. I do wish I had bought two sticks of 512 rather than one of 1024. Thanks, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 21:41:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6699716A425 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:41:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from portieowner@yahoo.com) Received: from web34206.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34206.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BB8543D7E for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:40:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from portieowner@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 22545 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Nov 2005 21:40:59 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YsBuGRIuqrrBhVuPuO5ghoDtL1kkdE2VK/5DZcxSTwXR/RT1avAYoXxL5N5j7KJ+x/CS32cM3BWN9r39S9iPQ6o2VTfi1dmcmtpc0FFTrRlJMnxYkJzC0nN+zUhTbVsOX+O6Y3GVd3f8mj02Cl4Xb3cspj432g9Zi32V7J6ag0w= ; Message-ID: <20051107214059.22542.qmail@web34206.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.8.65.72] by web34206.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:40:58 PST Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:40:58 -0800 (PST) From: Portie Owner To: Portie Owner , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051104175442.98421.qmail@web34206.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Non-system disk or disk error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:41:10 -0000 I don't know if this is poor netiquete or not but I am bumping my own question in case anyone missed it. Basically my 5.4 installation will not boot up from a "warm" reboot but will boot with no problems from a power-off situation. Thanks. --- Portie Owner wrote: > I am sure there is an easy solution to this but here > is my problem, and it is driving me nuts. > > The error message on boot is "Non-system disk or > disk > error". I only get this message if I do a warm > reboot > with no power off. If I halt the system and power > off > and restart it boots right up. > > Computer is a Compaq AP500 (P-II 450mhz, 700MB Ram, > Adaptec SCSI card). The system has two SCSI drives, > "C:" which is at ID 1 and "D:" which is at ID 2. > The > OS is FreeBDS 5.4, standard installation using the > FreeBSD-only boot manager (I also tried the > alternate > FreeBSD boot choice). No other OSs reside on the > machine and I have tried to start with a clean DOS > Fdisked bachine before installing FreeBSD. The PC > does not have the Compaq bios partition installed > but > that does not seem to matter. I have not been able > to > upgrade the ROM BIOS on this machine, but the Compaq > Diagnostics and Setup programs seem to work and > report > the right information about the disks. I even tried > disabling floppy and CD media boot but that dodn't > help either. > > Thanks, Portie > > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in > one click. > http://farechase.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 22:08:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F7E16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:08:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp1.linkline.com (smtp1.linkline.com [66.59.235.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8932B43D5F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:08:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp1.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF4E9CCEE; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:08:02 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:08:04 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: David Fleck Message-ID: Thread-Topic: How to sort find results Thread-Index: AcXj57mO+AhOd0/aEdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <20051107140553.U3084@grond.sourballs.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:08:09 -0000 Y'know, being a newbie at something is about as stupid as things generally get. So I'm feeling totally dumb at the moment. The directory I need to perform the find on, when using find, is just "/". find -x / The -x is to limit the find to only the startup volume. But when I try: # ./date_sort / I get: use: bad interpreter: No such file or directory I am in the proper directory (the one where date_sort is located) and did the chmod. Something really obvious right? Like the directory for this script to do the same thing find is doing needs a different form? All My Best, Jeffrey on 11/7/05 12:24 PM, David Fleck at david.fleck@mchsi.com wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > >> Hi, David-- >> >> Thank you. >> >> Wow. That looks great... >> >> Um... Can you tell me how to run it? > > Assuming you've saved everything from '#!/usr/bin/perl' to the final '}', > inclusive, to a file, name the file something, like 'date_sort'. Then > > chmod +x date_sort > > ./date_sort /directory/to/sort > > I use this primarily on directory hierarchies of regular files, so I'm not > guaranteeing what will happen if you use it on directories that contain > other sorts of files. > > > -- > David Fleck > david.fleck@mchsi.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 23:17:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6622616A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:17:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B356A43D76 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:17:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-7-29.client.mchsi.com[12.216.7.29]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with SMTP id <20051107231729m9100dundoe>; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:17:29 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:17:29 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: Jeffrey Ellis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20051107170105.M3084@grond.sourballs.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:17:41 -0000 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > Y'know, being a newbie at something is about as stupid as things generally > get. So I'm feeling totally dumb at the moment. The feeling will go away after a while, really. > But when I try: > > # ./date_sort / > > I get: > > use: bad interpreter: No such file or directory Sounds like it can't find perl, or there's a syntax error. (Perl is installed, right?) Paste the results of the following commands into a mail message: which perl head date_sort and we can see if there's anything obvious there. The script may be pointing to a non-existant executable. And also note that, as currently written, the perl script does not have an equivalent to the '-x' argument for 'find'. We might be able to get that in there, but probably should worry about just getting the script working first. -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 23:27:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B0F16A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:27:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4651743D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:27:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.75]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7961537055D for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165]) by filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.75]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17529-06-49 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (67-51-164-214.dsl1.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [67.51.164.214]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C6737065C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [165.107.42.123] (unknown [165.107.42.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46143153E3A for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:27:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <436FE2C9.20709@mykitchentable.net> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:27:05 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Subject: Disk Access Seems Slow in 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:27:56 -0000 I have two boxes running FBSD. One is an old AMD 350 mhz machine with just 128 MB of RAM and a 4 GB IDE drive that's attached to a 33mhz controller. The other is a dual Pentium 600 machine with 768 MB RAM and two 9 GB SCSI drives. Ever since I upgraded the dual Pentium from 4.11 to 5.4, disk access seems slower. I can't know for sure because I never did any benchmarking before. I used vinum striping in 4.x but moved to gstripe in 5.4. I notice it most when using an IMAP client to connect to Courier on this 5.4 machine. So maybe it's just slow with small files? Here's my 'gstripe list' output so you can see how the stripe set is built: --- BEGIN --- blacklamb# gstripe list Geom name: data State: UP Status: Total=2, Online=2 Type: AUTOMATIC Stripesize: 131072 ID: 1477809630 Providers: 1. Name: stripe/data Mediasize: 17160732672 (16G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e0 Consumers: 1. Name: da1s1d Mediasize: 8580481024 (8.0G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 Number: 1 2. Name: da0s1d Mediasize: 8580481024 (8.0G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 Number: 0 --- END --- I really don't know what to check or how to go about checking it. I Googled and found that bonnie++ seems to be popular. Another is postmark. I installed these tools and ran them both on my 5.4 server with the SCSI drives and the 4.11 server with the slow 33mhz IDE drive in it. Using default settings, postmark shows the 5.4 box about 2 1/2 times slower than the 4.11 box. --- BEGIN 5.4 Box --- Creating files...Done Performing transactions..........Done Deleting files...Done Time: 24 seconds total 9 seconds of transactions (55 per second) Files: 764 created (31 per second) Creation alone: 500 files (100 per second) Mixed with transactions: 264 files (29 per second) 243 read (27 per second) 257 appended (28 per second) 764 deleted (31 per second) Deletion alone: 528 files (52 per second) Mixed with transactions: 236 files (26 per second) Data: 1.36 megabytes read (58.22 kilobytes per second) 4.45 megabytes written (189.70 kilobytes per second) --- END 5.4 Box --- --- BEGIN 4.11 Box --- pm>run Creating files...Done Performing transactions..........Done Deleting files...Done Time: 10 seconds total 4 seconds of transactions (125 per second) Files: 764 created (76 per second) Creation alone: 500 files (100 per second) Mixed with transactions: 264 files (66 per second) 243 read (60 per second) 257 appended (64 per second) 764 deleted (76 per second) Deletion alone: 528 files (528 per second) Mixed with transactions: 236 files (59 per second) Data: 1.36 megabytes read (139.72 kilobytes per second) 4.45 megabytes written (455.28 kilobytes per second) --- END 4.11 Box --- I also ran bonnie++ on both boxes Here's ouput from the 5.4 box Version 1.93c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP blacklamb 300M 39 99 9115 18 8273 20 107 99 112354 99 2306 207 Latency 329ms 129ms 314ms 150ms 1557us 2365ms Version 1.93c ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- blacklamb -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 75 3 19237 99 116 3 75 3 19069 99 185 6 Latency 384ms 212us 260ms 209ms 662us 464ms And here's from the 4.11 box: Version 1.93c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP blacksheep 300M 47 96 4262 8 1954 5 101 96 4442 5 68.2 5 Latency 705ms 532ms 442ms 265ms 291ms 9196ms Version 1.93c ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- blacksheep -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 3806 62 12911 78 9469 91 3644 57 15577 99 2940 29 Latency 342ms 13128us 658us 247ms 644us 714ms I don't really know what all of this means. However the 4.11 box finished both tests much faster than the 5.4 box. Thus it seems I have a drive performance issue. What should I do to improve performance on the 5.4 box? I'm getting ready to upgrade to 6.0 and see this as an opportunity to modify the disk parameters if needed. Thanks, Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 23:35:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8A316A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:35:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from muse.calarts.edu (muse.calarts.edu [198.182.157.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8FE43D45 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:35:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from [198.182.157.164] (dhcp7164.calarts.edu [198.182.157.164]) by muse.calarts.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id jA7NZK421391 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:35:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <436FE4B7.4030505@calarts.edu> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:35:19 -0800 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: debug.log questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:35:26 -0000 I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 with sendmail that was included with FreeBSD. There is a debug.log that I have questions about. Is the debug.log just for mail troubleshooting? Can I turn it off or reduce the amount of logging? in /var/log/debug.log i see the following Nov 7 15:00:12 muse2 ipop3d[34683]: pop3s SSL service init from 172.x.x.x Nov 7 15:00:12 muse2 imapd[34684]: imaps SSL service init from 172.x.x.x These should be in the maillog file right? I did some searching on google and I found that these are just clients checking there mail. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 23:43:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCA316A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:43:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA83443D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:43:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jA7Nkcb79373; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:46:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Fatman" , Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:43:43 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Antivir for mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:43:49 -0000 clamav works for us. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Fatman >Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 12:19 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Antivir for mail server > > >I'm doubting about to install CLAM or DR.WEB antivir in the mail server. > >What do you advise to me? > >thnkx. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/162 - Release Date: >11/5/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 23:47:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9F016A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:47:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867A443D46 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:47:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52E95DAC; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:47:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57758-05; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:47:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0845C20; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:47:51 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <436FE4B7.4030505@calarts.edu> References: <436FE4B7.4030505@calarts.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1B9F1530-2EBC-4CE6-BC7D-60831539CC51@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:47:49 -0500 To: Sean Murphy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: debug.log questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:47:53 -0000 On Nov 7, 2005, at 6:35 PM, Sean Murphy wrote: > I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 with sendmail that was included with FreeBSD. > > There is a debug.log that I have questions about. > Is the debug.log just for mail troubleshooting? > Can I turn it off or reduce the amount of logging? No such file exists by default under FreeBSD. Certainly you can turn it off. See /etc/syslog.conf, you want to comment out the line mentioning debug.log. And then kill and restart syslogd... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 00:11:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D2916A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:11:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp1.linkline.com (smtp1.linkline.com [66.59.235.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC8F43D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:11:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp1.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36F79CD49; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:11:15 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:11:17 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: David Fleck Message-ID: Thread-Topic: How to sort find results Thread-Index: AcXj+PAgLq4wCE/sEdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <20051107170105.M3084@grond.sourballs.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:11:20 -0000 Hi, David-- Thanks :) # which perl /usr/bin/perl #head date_sort head: date_sort: No such file or directory All My Best, Jeffrey on 11/7/05 3:17 PM, David Fleck at david.fleck@mchsi.com wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: >> Y'know, being a newbie at something is about as stupid as things generally >> get. So I'm feeling totally dumb at the moment. > > The feeling will go away after a while, really. > >> But when I try: >> >> # ./date_sort / >> >> I get: >> >> use: bad interpreter: No such file or directory > > Sounds like it can't find perl, or there's a syntax error. (Perl is > installed, right?) Paste the results of the following commands into a mail > message: > > which perl > > head date_sort > > and we can see if there's anything obvious there. The script may be > pointing to a non-existant executable. > > And also note that, as currently written, the perl script does not have an > equivalent to the '-x' argument for 'find'. We might be able to get that > in there, but probably should worry about just getting the script working > first. > > > -- > David Fleck > david.fleck@mchsi.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 00:33:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340EC16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:33:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.burakowski@mrburak.net) Received: from mail.mrburak.net (203-217-17-178.perm.iinet.net.au [203.217.17.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586AA43D53 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:33:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.burakowski@mrburak.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [10.20.0.1]) by mail.mrburak.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C771A22820; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:33:44 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <436FF25A.4010200@mrburak.net> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:33:30 +1100 From: Richard Burakowski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20051107170105.M3084@grond.sourballs.org> In-Reply-To: <20051107170105.M3084@grond.sourballs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions , Jeffrey Ellis Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:33:51 -0000 David Fleck wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > >> But when I try: >> >> # ./date_sort / >> >> I get: >> >> use: bad interpreter: No such file or directory > usual suspect is Carriage Return/Line Feed line term instead of just Line Feed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 01:08:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E042D16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:08:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from muse.calarts.edu (muse.calarts.edu [198.182.157.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5896043D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:08:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smurphy@calarts.edu) Received: from [198.182.157.164] (dhcp7164.calarts.edu [198.182.157.164]) by muse.calarts.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id jA818d402308 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:08:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <436FFA95.4090801@calarts.edu> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:08:37 -0800 From: Sean Murphy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436FE4B7.4030505@calarts.edu> <1B9F1530-2EBC-4CE6-BC7D-60831539CC51@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <1B9F1530-2EBC-4CE6-BC7D-60831539CC51@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: debug.log questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:08:41 -0000 Charles Swiger wrote: > On Nov 7, 2005, at 6:35 PM, Sean Murphy wrote: >> I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 with sendmail that was included with FreeBSD. >> >> There is a debug.log that I have questions about. >> Is the debug.log just for mail troubleshooting? >> Can I turn it off or reduce the amount of logging? > > No such file exists by default under FreeBSD. Certainly you can turn it > off. > See /etc/syslog.conf, you want to comment out the line mentioning > debug.log. > > And then kill and restart syslogd... > > ---Chuck > > I just checked two 5.4 servers running sendmail that came with FreeBSD they both have the /var/log/debug.log just there is no entires in the debug.log on the second server. However it just mails the FreeBSD daily reports to the other server. Can anyone else check there FreeBSD servers 5.4 running sendmail and have this debug.log? -rw------- 1 root wheel 0 May 8 2005 debug.log same date as I made the server excerpt from the syslog.conf *.=debug /var/log/debug.log your right there is an entry for the debug in the syslog.conf however Im pretty sure this file is default FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 01:11:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7884F16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:11:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A06D43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:11:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA81BMOC052931 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:11:22 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jA81BMMk075972; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:11:22 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:11:22 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200511080111.jA81BMMk075972@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: kirk@strauser.com In-reply-to: <200511070952.05156.kirk@strauser.com> (message from Kirk Strauser on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:52:02 -0600) References: <200511040956.19087.kirk@strauser.com> <200511041129.17912.kirk@strauser.com> <200511070419.jA74JjS7068019@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <200511070952.05156.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast diff command for large files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:11:26 -0000 > Don't underestimate the strength of the word "legacy". To be honest, if we= > had the manhours to rewrite it, we'd take the opportunity to run it=20 > directly against the PostgreSQL server. > > What we're gaining out of this system is the ability to migrate our old=20 > applications at our leisure, and the opportunity to write new applications= OK, I didn't get that it was a temporary solution (during the migration period). My comment was more in the spirit of a permanent solution. Goo dluck, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 01:25:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6AE16A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:25:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D1143D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:25:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: from frankie.konav201.local (cpe-66-8-187-40.hawaii.res.rr.com [66.8.187.40]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id jA81PLDp005180; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:25:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:25:21 -1000 From: Robert Marella To: Robert Marella Message-ID: <20051107152521.0b8aa83a@frankie.konav201.local> In-Reply-To: <20051107111619.108a3ae3@frankie.konav201.local> References: <20051107185226.M70218@io.dk> <20051107190524.GA77411@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20051107111619.108a3ae3@frankie.konav201.local> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.99 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jwl@io.dk Subject: Re: enable smp / hyperthreading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:25:25 -0000 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:16:19 -1000 Robert Marella wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:05:24 +0100 > Roland Smith wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:53:20PM +0100, jwl@io.dk wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I've just installed 6.0-RELASE and am trying to get SMP to work (I > > > have af Pentium 4 with HT). So I've compiled the kernel with > > > 'options SMP' and according to dmesg the two CPUs are found: > > > > > > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > > > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > > > > > > But I'm not sure that both are enabled, because at this is at the > > > end of dmesg and I dont see the other CPU being enabled somewhere: > > > > > > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > > > > I think it is referring to the Auxiliary Processor (AP), because the > > BSP (don't know what that stands for, though) is obviously already > > active. > > > According to 'sysctl -a' there are 2 CPUs, but only 1 active and > > > SMP doesnt seem to be disabled: > > > > > > kern.smp.cpus: 2 > > > kern.smp.disabled: 0 > > > kern.smp.active: 1 > > > > sysctl -d kern.smp.active > > kern.smp.active: Number of Auxillary Processors (APs) that were > > successfully started > > > > This is the number of _extra_ CPUs, which chould be 1. > > > > Roland > > If hyperthreading is working the ouput of 'top' should have a C column > and will show either a 0 or a 1. > > AFAIK HTT is still disabled because of a security risk. See: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc > > If you do not believe you are at risk, there is a work around included > in the above site. > > YMMV. I have been known to be wrong before. :-) > > Robert > Replying to myself. It seems that once again I am wrong. I commented out the machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=1 in /boot/loader.conf on my 6.0 system and I still have the C column and showing 2 processors. Sorry about the noise. Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 01:52:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E170816A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:52:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1434D43D77 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:52:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E495E88; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:52:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25326-05; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:51:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3185C21; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:51:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <437004BF.3080303@mac.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:51:59 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Murphy References: <436FE4B7.4030505@calarts.edu> <1B9F1530-2EBC-4CE6-BC7D-60831539CC51@mac.com> <436FFA95.4090801@calarts.edu> In-Reply-To: <436FFA95.4090801@calarts.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: debug.log questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:52:10 -0000 Sean Murphy wrote: > Charles Swiger wrote: [ ... ] > I just checked two 5.4 servers running sendmail that came with FreeBSD > they both have the /var/log/debug.log just there is no entires in the > debug.log on the second server. However it just mails the FreeBSD daily > reports to the other server. > > Can anyone else check there FreeBSD servers 5.4 running sendmail and > have this debug.log? > > -rw------- 1 root wheel 0 May 8 2005 debug.log > > same date as I made the server > > excerpt from the syslog.conf > > *.=debug /var/log/debug.log > > your right there is an entry for the debug in the syslog.conf > > however Im pretty sure this file is default FreeBSD It turns out that you are right for 5.4, although that change has since been backed out: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/syslog.conf ...in the most current version, if I'm following the branches correctly. In either event, it's fine to discard debug-priority logging, unless actually debugging something. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 01:53:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C872C16A466 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:53:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF0443D66 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:53:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-7-29.client.mchsi.com[12.216.7.29]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with SMTP id <20051108015345m9100dtl33e>; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:53:45 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:53:44 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: Jeffrey Ellis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20051107195205.L3084@grond.sourballs.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:53:52 -0000 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: > Hi, David-- > > Thanks :) > > # which perl > /usr/bin/perl > #head date_sort > head: date_sort: No such file or directory ??? where'd the file go? Also, did you see Richard Burakowski's note about the possible carriage return / line feed problem? -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 02:20:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896CD16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:20:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23C3843D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:20:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 4143 invoked by uid 502); 8 Nov 2005 02:20:03 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 02:20:03 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <43700B52.2000909@ywave.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:20:02 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Zbyslaw References: <309AD90BD8FC7E4383DB1ACCBF6C8DC00173AAB9@usa0300ms01.na.xerox.net> <436F6EAE.7010605@ywave.com> <20051107160744.GB72376@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436F7E2C.3050208@ywave.com> <436F8A1A.6050301@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <436F8A1A.6050301@dial.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Diagnosing reboot under load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:20:05 -0000 Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Micah wrote: > >> Roland Smith wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:11:42AM -0800, Micah wrote: >>> >>>> I cleaned out all the fans, but they weren't that dirty. I can't >>>> test the temps while the system is under load (have to reboot and >>>> check them in the bios). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Try xmbmon of mbmon from the/usr/ports/sysutils/xmbmon port. That should >>> help you read the temperatures. >> >> >> >> Tried that before. It doesn't properly support my mobo. It displays >> a constant temp for both MB and CPU as 127 deg celsius (260.6 F). >> >> > On an ASUS Athlon 64 board (that's what you have isn't it?), -p winbond > worked reasonably for me. > > --Alex Thanks for the tips. I tried each probe and access method and -P lm75 -S are the only ones that don't immediately error out, and it still gives me: trisha% mbmon -P lm75 -S Temp.= 127.0, 127.0, 0.0; Rot.= 0, 0, 0 Vcore = 0.00, 0.00; Volt. = 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Will play with it more later. Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 02:23:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28EE16A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:23:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF91043D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:23:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA82NZv0055570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:23:35 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jA82NYSj076407; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:23:34 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:23:34 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200511080223.jA82NYSj076407@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <447jbkm9vv.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> (message from Lowell Gilbert on 07 Nov 2005 16:21:56 -0500) References: <200511071024.jA7AOAKl071986@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <447jbkm9vv.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: Re: Slow file transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:23:39 -0000 > Could be a duplex mismatch. Look for collision statistics. I checked that already, and as router1 must cross router2 to reach the FTP server, if there was a network issue between router2 and the FTP server, both transfer would be slow, not only the on from router2. Thanks, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 03:34:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085FA16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:34:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357CA43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:34:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Received: from [203.122.211.161] (ppp211-161.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.122.211.161]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jA83YaRk009144 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:04:37 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from matt@kbc.net.au) Message-ID: <43701CCB.3030902@kbc.net.au> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:04:35 +1030 From: Matthew Smith User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <436DCB19.2090005@kbc.net.au> <20051106102456.GA26939@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E6776.8030507@kbc.net.au> <20051106231903.GA46371@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <436E98B4.5080708@kbc.net.au> <2A52F60F-4FAA-4A78-A5BB-AB3B598A6B1B@secure-computing.net> <436EAB0E.2080104@kbc.net.au> <191587E5-6B8F-47D4-9156-C0B162A59DE3@secure-computing.net> <436EB046.1010305@kbc.net.au> In-Reply-To: <436EB046.1010305@kbc.net.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: NFS Installation Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 03:34:40 -0000 Hi Folks The problem hasn't gone away - no network card is identified. I have now tried the following: 1) Change network card (tested both Realtek and DLink) 2) Try both FreeBSD 6.0 and 5.4 (no difference) 3) Try boot without ACPI (same result on 6.0 and 5.4: can't find hard discs) 4) Reset BIOS to factory defaults (no difference) If nobody has any bright ideas, I'll just have to go back to struggle on with Linux for this project and try FreeBSD again when I've got other hardware I can play with. (My reason for moving from Linux for this project was the fact that the BSD kernel seems better suited to working with PPS timekeeping - trying to turn an aged Thinkpad into a stratum 1 time server.) I can only assume that FreeBSD has some problem with my MoBo or BIOS. Cheers M -- Matthew Smith South Australia http://www.kbc.net.au From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 04:11:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7287416A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:11:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp1.linkline.com (smtp1.linkline.com [66.59.235.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF4B43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:11:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp1.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519B19CD6D; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:11:35 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:11:37 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: Richard Burakowski Message-ID: Thread-Topic: How to sort find results Thread-Index: AcXkGoMewdqYAFANEdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <436FF25A.4010200@mrburak.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 04:11:40 -0000 Hi, Richard -- Do you mean in David's script (I have heard of that happening before with copy and paste)? How can I tell if that's the case? And how would I go about fixing it? All My Best, Jeffrey on 11/7/05 4:33 PM, Richard Burakowski at richard.burakowski@mrburak.net wrote: > David Fleck wrote: > >> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: >> >>> But when I try: >>> >>> # ./date_sort / >>> >>> I get: >>> >>> use: bad interpreter: No such file or directory >> > usual suspect is Carriage Return/Line Feed line term instead of just > Line Feed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 22:11:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF13216A420 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:11:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.dessent@hallamracks.com) Received: from mail.gr8mate.com (mail.hallamracks.com [203.62.141.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AD143D8C for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:11:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.dessent@hallamracks.com) Received: from hmvpnsvr ([202.86.208.98]) by mail.gr8mate.com (Merak 8.0.3) with ESMTP id B2084721 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:10:58 +1100 From: "Brendan Dessent" To: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:09:54 +1100 Organization: Hallam OzConnect MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830 Thread-Index: AcXj5/s9MHwJ6Vt8Tr69MRxUbBxQxg== Message-Id: <20051107221104.30AD143D8C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 04:25:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Powerrail monitoring X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: b.dessent@hallamracks.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:11:33 -0000 Hello. Can NetBoz be used to remotely monitor powerrails within a server cabinet? If you could come back to me it would be appreciated. Regards Brendan Dessent HALLAM MANUFACTURING Ph: 02 9648 3955 Fax: 02 9648 3477 M: 0419 556 246 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 04:26:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F4C16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:26:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dm@mainframe.ca) Received: from mail.vfs.com (mail.multimedia.edu [208.181.60.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F90F43D48 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:26:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dm@mainframe.ca) Received: from s0106001310222e6f.vn.shawcable.net ([24.86.8.7] helo=[10.10.10.105]) by mail.vfs.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EZL47-000Dww-SL for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:26:36 -0800 Message-ID: <437028F8.3020303@mainframe.ca> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:26:32 -0800 From: Derrick MacPherson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.vfs.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: i have proftpd getting users out of a mysql DB, and it's set to create home dirs automaticaly; how do i get there to be a quota automaticaly be placed on the users? [...] Content analysis details: (-3.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -3.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP Cc: Subject: setting a quotas default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 04:26:37 -0000 i have proftpd getting users out of a mysql DB, and it's set to create home dirs automaticaly; how do i get there to be a quota automaticaly be placed on the users? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 03:03:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F23D16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:03:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ansarm@sympatico.ca) Received: from BAYC1-PASMTP01.bayc1.hotmail.com (bayc1-pasmtp01.bayc1.hotmail.com [65.54.191.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAC843D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ansarm@sympatico.ca) Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [70.50.108.143] X-Originating-Email: [ansarm@sympatico.ca] Received: from ansarmm2 ([70.50.108.143]) by BAYC1-PASMTP01.bayc1.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:03:41 -0800 From: "Ansar Mohammed" To: Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:03:33 -0500 Message-ID: <001501c5e411$0413f180$0a02a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcXkEQEBhqxYb+EqTdGpuZkET75Z+g== X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2005 03:03:42.0019 (UTC) FILETIME=[063D6130:01C5E411] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 04:26:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Release vs Stable vs Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 03:03:43 -0000 Has the terminology for "production ready" FreeBSD changed? Is FreeBSD Release now considered Stable? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 05:12:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CF316A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:12:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@servingpeace.com) Received: from smtp.servingpeace.com (servingpeace.com [69.55.225.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFB743D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:12:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@servingpeace.com) Received: from [10.0.0.30] (adsl-68-125-161-145.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.125.161.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.servingpeace.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A5BBA224; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:12:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <437033AD.3050803@servingpeace.com> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:12:13 -0800 From: Sam Nilsson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ansar Mohammed References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Release vs Stable vs Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 05:12:20 -0000 Ansar Mohammed wrote: > Has the terminology for "production ready" FreeBSD changed? > > Is FreeBSD Release now considered Stable? I don't think so, no. "Stable" refers to the branch of development from which Production releases are made. Right now that is the FreeBSD 6 branch. Future point releases of FreeBSD 6 will be made from the Stable branch until the time that FreeBSD 6 becomes a legacy release. - Sam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 05:35:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AE516A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:35:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from fw.c-side.com (gw.c-side.com [198.144.201.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89ACF43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:35:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from lx.c-side.com (lx.c-side.com [198.144.194.170]) by fw.c-side.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4506817DE23 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:35:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by lx.c-side.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 4BE3914F34; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:35:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline From: Neil Russell Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:35:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1131428140.13865.TMDA@lx.c-side.com> References: <20051108053522.9499017DE23@fw.c-side.com> In-Reply-To: <20051108053522.9499017DE23@fw.c-side.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Precedence: normal Auto-Submitted: auto-replied X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) Cc: Subject: Please confirm your message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Reply-To: neil-confirm-1131428140.13865.6ada1e@c-side.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 05:35:33 -0000 Hi, The message you sent recently is being held because your address has not been verified. To confirm that your message was not junk-mail, please reply to this Email or send an empty message to this address: neil-confirm-1131428140.13865.6ada1e@c-side.com You should only have to confirm your address once. Neil. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 05:48:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2FC16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:48:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E9443D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA85mTIg007370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:48:29 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jA85mSrC079065; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:48:28 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:48:28 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200511080548.jA85mSrC079065@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: SSH X11 forwarding fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 05:48:34 -0000 Hi, I am SSH'ing to a FreeBSD machine and enable X11 forwarding. Everything was working fine untill I rebooted this morning. Since then: # xterm X Error of failed request: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Major opcode of failed request: 20 (X_GetProperty) Atom id in failed request: 0x17 Serial number of failed request: 3 Current serial number in output stream: 3 # env|grep DISPLAY DISPLAY=localhost:10.0 What could that be? Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 06:03:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD05716A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557EE43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:03:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA863duv007986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:03:39 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jA863dUI079466; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:03:39 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:03:39 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200511080603.jA863dUI079466@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <200511080548.jA85mSrC079065@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> (message from Olivier Nicole on Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:48:28 +0700 (ICT)) References: <200511080548.jA85mSrC079065@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> to: X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: Re: SSH X11 forwarding fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:03:43 -0000 > I am SSH'ing to a FreeBSD machine and enable X11 forwarding. > Everything was working fine untill I rebooted this morning. > Since then: > # xterm > X Error of failed request: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) Bad me to reply to my own question... I need to add "ForwardX11Trusted yes" in SSH config (/etc/ssh/ssh_config) of the SSH client. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 06:29:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A113A16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8B343D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from [208.216.126.145] (ts5m-pool0-145.gti.net [208.216.126.145]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id F270235492 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 01:26:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:32:43 -0500 From: Bob Perry User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Major Error Upgrading to GNOME 2.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:29:32 -0000 This past weekend, I CVSup'd the ports tree and prepared to run portupgrade. I noticed a large number of GNOME ports in my output from pkg_version and, found that I would need to run the GNOME Project 's upgrade script to upgrade to 2.12. I use a dial-up modem had been timed out on several occasions.during the process This happened about three times during the night and I had to restart the upgrade each time. Note that I failed to use the restart flag recommended during the first restart. I finally ended up with a "succesful upgrade..." message even though I now have only 188 ports after beginning with 297. Amongst the missing is gnome 2.12 itself. I'm hoping there is some way to get things back to normal and rerun the upgrade without re-installing the missing ports. BTW, I did back up /var/db/pkg. Any advice would be appreciated. I run 5.4 -RELEASE #0. I'm running this message from a second machine but should be able to supply the logs if needed. Thanks, Bob Perry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 06:58:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B604116A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:58:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from goodredhat@yahoo.com) Received: from web34002.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34002.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C41E43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:58:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from goodredhat@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 22656 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Nov 2005 06:58:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=goBYfkqDHpFcDlCOERAiCsN+Xkh1vKEsnJkU20cTL/xFOYbeKhSOgT6NtfBDL5hDWfoh2bSntHtQK5u5oLDNuMyvYetGaEBmFtf2RBaHOT18lElyVLEymCMtwOc0XzCS2M4qprFiUtoCaCWv2/QoTd/fK5tiuoGT12wItiknLCg= ; Message-ID: <20051108065848.22654.qmail@web34002.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.54.195.82] by web34002.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:58:48 PST Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:58:48 -0800 (PST) From: manish jain To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Low volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:58:49 -0000 Hi, I am using FreeBSD 5.4 with an Intel 810 chipset which has an onboard soundcard. While everything else works fine, the sound volume is inexplicably low. I have set snd_ich_load to "YES" in loader.conf, which is probably all I am required to do. Even when I use Volume Control to set the PCM to maximum volume (with the 800 W speakers too set to maximum volume), sound is barely audible in multimedia applications like xmms and xine. What could possibly be wrong ? Thanks for any help. Manish Jain --------------------------------- Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 07:04:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004B416A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:04:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8002843D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:04:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so579750wxc for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:04:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=tj9EqYyfRyTac5/gwJdS++aKNfkyYaJ7yLvIJ0CQn6GfUw6g/36g0nC1dy9SQ9gIX8C8RCBTH3Y/vkztSJrlWhwr3hTzJvtcBoL+lKnNXGCW+Oo7sBGMAfR/g3jSDDkFbnKzwh50ifNGoZHdOV8FvnK5CCa6h4r/DDqeAk5Q66Q= Received: by 10.70.109.20 with SMTP id h20mr6037794wxc; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:57:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h34sm896864wxd.2005.11.07.22.57.25; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 22:57:26 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:48:46 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> In-Reply-To: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511072248.47331.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Major Error Upgrading to GNOME 2.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:04:45 -0000 On Monday 07 November 2005 22:32, Bob Perry wrote: > This past weekend, I CVSup'd the ports tree and prepared to run > portupgrade. I noticed a large number of GNOME ports in my output from > pkg_version and, found that I would need to run the GNOME Project 's > upgrade script to upgrade to 2.12. > > I use a dial-up modem had been timed out on several occasions.during the > process This happened about three times during the night and I had to > restart the upgrade each time. Note that I failed to use the restart > flag recommended during the first restart. I finally ended up with a > "succesful upgrade..." message even though I now have only 188 ports > after beginning with 297. Amongst the missing is gnome 2.12 itself. > > I'm hoping there is some way to get things back to normal and rerun the > upgrade without re-installing the missing ports. BTW, I did back up > /var/db/pkg. > > Any advice would be appreciated. I run 5.4 -RELEASE #0. I'm running > this message from a second machine but should be able to supply the logs > if needed. > > Thanks, > Bob Perry get sysutils/portmanager make sure it is version 0.3.3, you need a very up to date tree, then run portmanager x11/gnome2 -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 07:12:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C9316A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:12:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4B843D4C for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:12:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so471223wra for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:12:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-mobile:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JV91uE1i7+ElJUW9As1eFNAIf3Ylj03uqDtKgh9aTrLaJ/I17L3mOrCuD4HS+msUpipWx+nQhtWwGf7lFzuD2Vi0ZgIBWqX+lOMBUrkFNJvGStQJ54zKCH7q2lRNteC3S6v5K10GqfwXWp+ABqpocF12xQe60itTJxaTUrarX7I= Received: by 10.54.126.14 with SMTP id y14mr1397353wrc; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:12:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ( [203.145.188.150]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 65sm4196298wra.2005.11.07.23.12.08; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:12:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43704FAB.6020500@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:41:39 +0530 From: Subhro Organization: IBM Advanced Career Education User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: manish jain References: <20051108065848.22654.qmail@web34002.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051108065848.22654.qmail@web34002.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mobile: +919831064613 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:12:19 -0000 manish jain sat at his 'puter and typed on 11/8/2005 12:28: > Hi, > > I am using FreeBSD 5.4 with an Intel 810 chipset which has an onboard soundcard. While everything else works fine, the sound volume is inexplicably low. I have set snd_ich_load to "YES" in loader.conf, which is probably all I am required to do. Even when I use Volume Control to set the PCM to maximum volume (with the 800 W speakers too set to maximum volume), sound is barely audible in multimedia applications like xmms and xine. What could possibly be wrong ? > > Thanks for any help. > Manish Jain > > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Install aumix from the Ports collection and try to control the volume from there. Thanks S. -- ---------------+---------------------------------------------- | Subhro Sankha Kar \ / | GSM: +919831064613 -- Fax: +919831832913 \./ | MSN:subhro@subhro.org -- Yahoo: subhro82 (0Y0) | ICQ: 203567534 -- AIM: bsdboy1982 ooO--(_)--Ooo--+---------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 07:27:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B33216A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:27:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asiercu@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0ECA43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:27:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asiercu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so528786wra for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:27:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Ruoaq3OEeQQrNICnbSM+zsD0HIYP8EIrcJCZ6Tm+7ZJX4Nrlmht6FxqCBWaZYZgfUGHXXsuU/whpsv8Y2WmuLqVOuclSrYlzzIMjZAWd0T1lizHpGZU4PyQpVx6cm5p6YYsOqeHf0rQLQZyl9sLiLBaKa0ddNFxEcrhQa71Xd2E= Received: by 10.65.241.14 with SMTP id t14mr6296368qbr; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:20:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.119.16 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:20:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:20:58 +0100 From: Asier Cuevas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Quota message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:27:48 -0000 Hello list, I have FreeBSD + SendMail + Option Quota enable. If a user disk quota exceeded, I have receive this message: /var/mail/aj.bunyola: Disc quota exceeded Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours Will keep trying until message is 5 days old How can modify this message? Thanks PD: Sorry, my english is very bad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 07:34:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EE216A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:34:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mac@orthanc.st.hmc.edu) Received: from orthanc.st.hmc.edu (orthanc.ST.HMC.Edu [134.173.56.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0000F43D48 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:34:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mac@orthanc.st.hmc.edu) Received: by orthanc.st.hmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1BF6A6135; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:33:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:33:45 -0800 From: Mac Mason To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051108073344.GB65651@orthanc.st.hmc.edu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200511080548.jA85mSrC079065@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <200511080603.jA863dUI079466@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511080603.jA863dUI079466@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: SSH X11 forwarding fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:34:41 -0000 --C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:03:39PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > I need to add "ForwardX11Trusted yes" in SSH config > (/etc/ssh/ssh_config) of the SSH client. Or connect with: % ssh -Y --Mac --C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDcFTY1AphoTGXiN0RAnk2AJ9LSSUV2KuB2++kVVZu+rQjLW/WEwCfbyQB N/l23dbrXkKO1gHo/WqIj5c= =IKMq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 07:36:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D85416A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:36:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ath101a@yahoo.com) Received: from web60515.mail.yahoo.com (web60515.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB53243D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:36:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ath101a@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 10970 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Nov 2005 07:36:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gKAbH44SHYci1dOT3zr+46I4NYJnkNe31bMrKCLLDlCuiBPfGJw0i23bVk64Cnzzz5yd+Jg+qyEC6vhhh82C62tln04vFP9Ben5I6Oq3k5FBYgaRWpECWphCys77obDPodfxhYXQhja0BOyiqF7YnF4RDVkrt0WNFVOvMoRjato= ; Message-ID: <20051108073654.10968.qmail@web60515.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.100.76.204] by web60515.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:36:53 PST Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:36:53 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Thomas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Network strangeness only with incoming email X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:36:55 -0000 Only during _incoming_ email there are a lot of network errors/pauses, including 'tcp retransmission' errors. This seems to cause sendmail to generate the infamous "did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MTA" errormessage. Yes, some of this is from spammers. But, email from known good sources is bouncing due to this problem as well - frequently. We're seeing upwards of 400 of the MTA errors a day on this box that normally sees maybe 100 spam rejects from rbl lists and maybe 50 legit messages in the same time period. Note that all other traffic seems to be fine, including connecting from an email client from inside the office. This is what's so boggling. Why only incoming email from the internet? I'm hoping someone can give me an idea where this problem might lie. Other important info: This has been going on for months now. It started with an old machine running 4.6 stable from too long ago to remember. That box is now retired and a brand new one is in its place running 5.4 stable. So, new OS and completely new hardware (including NICs - the old was an 'fxp' and the new is an 'sk' for completeness). Sendmail has been used all along. In desperation I figured I'd try postfix. The same problems occur. DNS queries are in the 10s of ms range so it's not slow DNS lookups. The box itself doesn't have DNS, using the hosts file instead since it's inside a small office. Also, I tried removing the rbl checking and it didn't change a thing. I ran tcpdump and what I think is an example of the pertinent output is below. Does _anyone_ have any ideas what the problem might be? It finally occurred to me today to check the cable and such but why would it only cause problems for email? The DSL router it's hooked up to has been cycled many times. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Andy 6353 12:46:09.124457 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP 60558 > smtp [SYN] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=16384 Len=0 MSS=1400 6354 12:46:09.124527 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y TCP smtp > 60558 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 6355 12:46:09.126246 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP 60559 > smtp [SYN] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=16384 Len=0 MSS=1400 6356 12:46:09.126274 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y TCP smtp > 60559 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 6359 12:46:09.217220 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP 60558 > smtp [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 6361 12:46:09.219982 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP 60559 > smtp [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 6370 12:46:11.742768 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y TCP 63520 > auth [SYN] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSV=290246199 TSER=0 6372 12:46:11.744676 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y TCP 61983 > auth [SYN] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSV=290246199 TSER=0 6373 12:46:14.740948 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y TCP 63520 > auth [SYN] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=131070 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSV=290246499 TSER=0 6374 12:46:14.740958 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y TCP 61983 > auth [SYN] Seq=0 Ack=0 Win=131070 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 TSV=290246499 TSER=0 8385 12:46:54.213542 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP 60559 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 8389 12:46:54.242433 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP 60558 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 8735 12:46:57.073048 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60558 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 8736 12:46:57.074292 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60559 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 9460 12:47:03.119595 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60558 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 9461 12:47:03.120839 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60559 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 10930 12:47:15.175216 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60558 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 10931 12:47:15.176185 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60559 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 13806 12:47:39.341907 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60558 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 13807 12:47:39.342451 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60559 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 15069 12:48:27.460972 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60558 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 15070 12:48:27.461933 y.y.y.y x.x.x.x TCP [TCP Retransmission] 60559 > smtp [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=16800 Len=0 15116 12:50:23.513002 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y SMTP Response: 220 x.domain.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.4/8.13.4; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:46:17 -0800 (PST) 15117 12:50:23.513013 x.x.x.x y.y.y.y SMTP Response: 220 x.domain.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.4/8.13.4; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:46:17 -0800 (PST) __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 07:40:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F338916A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philip@paeps.cx) Received: from gateway.nixsys.be (gateway.nixsys.be [195.144.77.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1147B43D48 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philip@paeps.cx) Received: from wotan.home.paeps.cx (wotan.home.paeps.cx [IPv6:2001:6f8:32f:10:a00:20ff:fe9b:138c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wotan.home.paeps.cx", Issuer "NixSys CA" (verified OK)) by gateway.nixsys.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4802940DD; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:40:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from fasolt.home.paeps.cx (fasolt.home.paeps.cx [IPv6:2001:6f8:32f:10:20a:e6ff:fe7d:c08]) by wotan.home.paeps.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F019618F; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:40:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from fasolt.home.paeps.cx (philip@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fasolt.home.paeps.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA87e5DC032997; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:40:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from philip@fasolt.home.paeps.cx) Received: (from philip@localhost) by fasolt.home.paeps.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jA87e5de032866; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:40:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from philip) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:40:04 +0100 From: Philip Paeps To: Ansar Mohammed Message-ID: <20051108074004.GG61111@fasolt.home.paeps.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Ansar Mohammed , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001501c5e411$0413f180$0a02a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001501c5e411$0413f180$0a02a8c0@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> X-Date-in-Rome: ante diem VI Idus Novembres MMDCCLVIII ab Urbe Condida X-PGP-Fingerprint: FA74 3C27 91A6 79D5 F6D3 FC53 BF4B D0E6 049D B879 X-Message-Flag: Get a proper mailclient! Organization: Happily Disorganized User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Release vs Stable vs Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:40:13 -0000 On 2005-11-07 22:03:33 (-0500), Ansar Mohammed wrote: > Has the terminology for "production ready" FreeBSD changed? > > Is FreeBSD Release now considered Stable? Releases have always been considered stable. :-) At least at the time they are cut. A -RELEASE is a snapshot of a -STABLE branch. Currently, there are three branches that call themselves -STABLE: RELENG_4, RELENG_5 and RELENG_6, respectively 4-STABLE, 5-STABLE and 6-STABLE. - Philip -- Philip Paeps Please don't Cc me, I am philip@freebsd.org subscribed to the list. A farm in the country side had several turkeys, it was known as the house of seven gobbles. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 07:41:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD24516A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:41:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C59F43D5D for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 580 invoked by uid 1006); 8 Nov 2005 07:41:33 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:SA:0(-0.8/100.0):. Processed in 1.092199 secs); 08 Nov 2005 07:41:33 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (10.75.0.10) by -v with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 07:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 24266 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 07:41:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 07:41:31 -0000 Received: from 12.170.206.13 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:41:31 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1758.12.170.206.13.1131435691.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:41:31 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: USB Hard Drive Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:41:36 -0000 Recently, I purchased several Western Digital External Hard Drives to be used for backup purposes. The test unit I purchased worked out of the box, but I am having problems getting the newer ones to work. When they are plugged in to a FreeBSD 5.3 or 5.4 server, I receive the following messages: Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: umass0: Western Digital External HDD, rev 2.00/6.02 Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: uhid0: Western Digital External HDD, rev 2.00/6.02, addr2, iclass 8/6 This is where my confusion lies. From what I can see the hard drive is detected properly as a umass device, but is also detected as a human input device. And, the da device, which I think I will use to access the device is not created. If I plug my memory stick into the USB port, the memory stick is detected and I am able to access the device through da0. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 07:44:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E6316A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:44:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD2F43D72 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA87i2Tc011775 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:44:02 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id jA87i0vA081249; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:44:00 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:44:00 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200511080744.jA87i0vA081249@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: ath101a@yahoo.com In-reply-to: <20051108073654.10968.qmail@web60515.mail.yahoo.com> (message from Andrew Thomas on Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:36:53 -0800 (PST)) References: <20051108073654.10968.qmail@web60515.mail.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network strangeness only with incoming email X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:44:16 -0000 > Only during _incoming_ email there are a lot of network errors/pauses, > including 'tcp retransmission' errors. This seems to cause sendmail Do you receive your email straigh from internet, or do you receive email from a gateway, say at your ISP? If there is a mail server that is in charge of receiving all your email before forwarding to you,the problem could lie between that machine and yours. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 07:58:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF9C16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:58:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ath101a@yahoo.com) Received: from web60524.mail.yahoo.com (web60524.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.178.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF86543D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:58:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ath101a@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 73936 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Nov 2005 07:58:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hp3q3ms/8rpowdKCT89CCs9YKW3ZR9RnAN2Su5Cr8ZyqRL4moO0JyKCedqCMhv+37yl1Be1lggTuNxflzwGqblXSnuL046D1qBwWZ7WpboyotInYmayqZLtlU+3hIfcnMKeEaybrzb0eRyF8R4JVjYw1iKnSZ5i6STcyocZGZEM= ; Message-ID: <20051108075834.73934.qmail@web60524.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.100.76.204] by web60524.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:58:33 PST Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:58:33 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Thomas To: Olivier Nicole In-Reply-To: <200511080744.jA87i0vA081249@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network strangeness only with incoming email X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:58:35 -0000 --- Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Only during _incoming_ email there are a lot of network > errors/pauses, > > including 'tcp retransmission' errors. This seems to cause > sendmail > > Do you receive your email straigh from internet, or do you receive > email from a gateway, say at your ISP? > > If there is a mail server that is in charge of receiving all your > email before forwarding to you,the problem could lie between that > machine and yours. > > Olivier > Ah, good question. It comes straight in so no intermediaries. Thanks! Andy __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 08:19:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2F916A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (just.puresimplicity.net [140.177.207.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DB043D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:19:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (localhost.puresimplicity.net [127.0.0.1]) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA88Jfse027369 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:19:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hemi@just.puresimplicity.net) Received: (from hemi@localhost) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jA88Jfa9027368 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:19:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hemi) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 02:19:41 -0600 From: Josh Tolbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051108081941.GA27333@just.puresimplicity.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Unusual permissions on /var/named/etc/namedb/master? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:19:42 -0000 Hello, I'm running DHCP + dynamic DNS here on my home LAN and I've noticed a problem that needs a manual fix every time the DNS machine gets rebooted. It doesn't happen very often, but it does happen. :) My firewall/gateway machine runs FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE of some patchlevel. It uses ISC DHCPD from ports to update my DNS server, another FreeBSD machine (now running 6.0-RELEASE) with new entries when machines register with the DHCP server. The problem arises because by default named runs -u bind, however /var/named/etc/namedb/master is owned by root. I believe this is caused by /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist, since I'm running bind chrooted (the default setup). When the DNS machine reboots, I have to manually chown /var/named/etc/namedb/master (or /etc/namedb/master) to bind before updates will continue, otherwise I see errors such as named[297]: dumping master file: master/tmp-QQ2UU6pWaZ: open: permission denied Is there any good workaround for this issue? I'd like to keep bind running as the bind user as well as keep bind chrooted if possible. I know I could edit the mtree file on my machine, but that seems somewhat kludgy to me. Thanks for any help/advice you can give me, Josh -- Josh Tolbert hemi@puresimplicity.net || http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/ If your sysadmin's not being fascist, you're paying him too much. --Sam Greenfield From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 10:41:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49BA16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:41:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7282143D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:41:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EZQu9-0000YQ-J1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:40:41 +0100 Received: from 0x5551206f.adsl.cybercity.dk ([85.81.32.111]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:40:41 +0100 Received: from jwl by 0x5551206f.adsl.cybercity.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:40:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jeppe Larsen Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:29:33 +0100 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <20051107185226.M70218@io.dk> <20051107190524.GA77411@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20051107111619.108a3ae3@frankie.konav201.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 0x5551206f.adsl.cybercity.dk User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: news Subject: Re: enable smp / hyperthreading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:41:29 -0000 On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 11:16:19 -1000, Robert Marella wrote: > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc > That did the trick, I think :) -- regards, Jeppe W. Larsen "Logic is the beginning of wisdom; not the end." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 10:53:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E4716A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:53:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from raghu@mri.ernet.in) Received: from mail.mri.ernet.in (mail.mri.ernet.in [202.41.87.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF6A43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:53:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from raghu@mri.ernet.in) Received: from ipc2.mri.ernet.in (internalmail.office.hri [192.168.1.9]) by mail.mri.ernet.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99E48522A; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:40:07 +0500 (MVT) Received: from ipc2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipc2 (Postfix) with SMTP id 5734CAE3E; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:23:04 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (riemann.mri.ernet.in [192.168.3.122]) by ipc2.mri.ernet.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381584863; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:23:04 +0530 (IST) Received: from riemann.mri.ernet.in (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA8ArMq4089618; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:23:22 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu@riemann.mri.ernet.in) Received: (from raghu@localhost) by riemann.mri.ernet.in (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA8ArMf8089615; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:23:22 +0530 (IST) (envelope-from raghu) Sender: raghu@mri.ernet.in To: manish jain References: <20051108065848.22654.qmail@web34002.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Organization: Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI) X-Address: Chhatnag Road, Jhusi, Allahabad 211 019, India X-URL: http://www.mri.ernet.in/ X-Phone: +91 (532) 2667 509, 2667 318, 2667 578, 2567 746, 2567 747 X-Fax: +91 (532) 2667 576, 2567 748, 2567 444, 2568 036 X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0x03618806 X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: C75D D0AF 457E 7454 BEC2 37AD C6E1 0407 0361 8806 X-OpenPGP-Public-Key-Available-At: http://www.keyserver.net/ From: "N. Raghavendra" In-Reply-To: <20051108065848.22654.qmail@web34002.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: 08 Nov 2005 16:23:22 +0530 Message-ID: <86fyq7fm1p.fsf@riemann.mri.ernet.in> Lines: 40 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "N. Raghavendra" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:53:17 -0000 At 2005-11-07T22:58:48-08:00, manish jain wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 5.4 with an Intel 810 chipset which has an > onboard soundcard. While everything else works fine, the sound > volume is inexplicably low. You could use mixer(8) to control the volume and other sound parameters, with a command like this: % mixer vol 100 To make the settings persist over reboots, add the following to `/boot/device.hints': ## Set the audio mixer's volume channel [Handbook, 7.2.4]. hint.pcm.0.vol="100" ## Do the above for all mixer channels. The available channels can be ## found using mixer(8). hint.pcm.0.pcm="100" hint.pcm.0.speaker="100" hint.pcm.0.line="100" hint.pcm.0.mic="100" hint.pcm.0.cd="100" hint.pcm.0.rec="100" hint.pcm.0.ogain="100" hint.pcm.0.line1="100" hint.pcm.0.phin="100" hint.pcm.0.phout="100" hint.pcm.0.video="100" I do not understand the way the sound system works, so some of the above channels may be meaningless. However, it should give one the idea. HTH, Raghavendra. -- N. Raghavendra | See message headers for contact Harish-Chandra Research Institute | and OpenPGP details. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 12:27:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C170E16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bachng@nttv6.jp) Received: from gura.nttv6.jp (gura.nttv6.jp [210.163.36.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6388D43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:27:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bachng@nttv6.jp) Received: from nirvana.nttv6.jp (nirvana.nttv6.jp [IPv6:2001:218:1f01:1::2687]) by gura.nttv6.jp (NTTv6MTA) with ESMTP id 962B71FE3F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:27:42 +0900 (JST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:218:1f01:0:212:3fff:feb1:6647] (unknown [IPv6:2001:218:1f01:0:212:3fff:feb1:6647]) by nirvana.nttv6.jp (NTTv6MTA) with ESMTP id 760FF12829F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:27:42 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <437099C8.2050007@nttv6.jp> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:27:52 +0900 From: Nguyen Huu Bach Organization: NTT Communications User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43671176.4010801@nttv6.jp> In-Reply-To: <43671176.4010801@nttv6.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Intel 945G for FreeBSD5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bachng@nttv6.jp List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:27:44 -0000 hi all, I solved this problem. Hope someone will find the following information useful. 1)For the 945G, using the patch proposed by Chris Wing, I can run xorg with i810 driver. 2)And the on-board NIC (Intel PRO/100 VE Network Connection) can be recognized by the fxp driver with the following patch --- /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c Tue Nov 8 11:41:56 2005 +++ /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c.bak Tue Nov 1 02:50:05 2005 @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ { 0x1037, -1, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 Ethernet" }, { 0x1038, -1, "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" }, { 0x1039, -1, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" }, - { 0x103A, -1, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" }, + { 0x103A, -1, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet" }, { 0x103B, -1, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" }, { 0x103C, -1, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet" }, { 0x103D, -1, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" }, @@ -190,7 +190,6 @@ { 0x1229, 0x10, "Intel 82551 Pro/100 Ethernet" }, { 0x1229, -1, "Intel 82557/8/9 Pro/100 Ethernet" }, { 0x2449, -1, "Intel 82801BA/CAM (ICH2/3) Pro/100 Ethernet" }, - { 0x27DC, -1, "Intel ????? Pro/100 VE Ethernet" }, { 0, -1, NULL }, }; best regards Nguyen Huu Bach wrote: >Hi all, > >My FreeBSD 5.4 does not recognize the Intel 945G Graphic (on board) card. >Is there any way to make this possible ? > >Thank you very much > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 12:49:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B86716A444 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fanijak@email.t-com.hr) Received: from ls405.htnet.hr (ls405.htnet.hr [195.29.150.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DF043D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:49:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fanijak@email.t-com.hr) Received: from ls401.t-com.hr (ls401.t-com.hr [195.29.150.236]) by ls405.htnet.hr (0.0.0/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jA8CmxWv031214 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:49:09 +0100 Received: from ls401.t-com.hr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ls401.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 5D36D70005 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:49:09 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender: fanijak@email.t-com.hr Received: from [127.0.0.1] (83-131-177-223.adsl.net.t-com.hr [83.131.177.223]) by ls401.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id C8751A8055 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:49:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4370A083.7050909@email.t-com.hr> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:56:35 +0100 From: fanijak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090205000704080509080607" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: seti at home 3.08 instal problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:49:13 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090205000704080509080607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I recently instal the seti at home version 3.08 and I have a problem. [Error -40;0] and I can not connect to the server. How to resolve this problem ? --------------090205000704080509080607-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 13:06:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BC516A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:06:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BBB43D60 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:06:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 24192 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 13:06:33 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Nov 2005 13:06:32 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8BE7328441; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:06:31 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200511071024.jA7AOAKl071986@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <447jbkm9vv.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <200511080223.jA82NYSj076407@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Nov 2005 08:06:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200511080223.jA82NYSj076407@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Message-ID: <44acgfnvag.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Slow file transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:06:36 -0000 Olivier Nicole writes: > > Could be a duplex mismatch. Look for collision statistics. > > I checked that already, Okay, then you need to look at the traffic. In particular, you'll need to keep an eye on the TCP send window as the transfer progresses. > and as router1 must cross router2 to reach the > FTP server, if there was a network issue between router2 and the FTP > server, both transfer would be slow, not only the on from router2. That's not necessarily the case. The timing changes, and it is quite often enough to keep the next packet from stepping on the toes of the response to the previous one. Be well. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 13:15:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3F616A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:15:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36C843D48 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:15:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 4171 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 13:15:21 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Nov 2005 13:15:20 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D728C28441; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:15:19 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Bob Perry References: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Nov 2005 08:15:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> Message-ID: <4464r3nuvs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major Error Upgrading to GNOME 2.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:15:22 -0000 Bob Perry writes: > This past weekend, I CVSup'd the ports tree and prepared to run > portupgrade. I noticed a large number of GNOME ports in my output > from pkg_version and, found that I would need to run the GNOME Project > 's upgrade script to upgrade to 2.12. > > I use a dial-up modem had been timed out on several occasions.during > the process This happened about three times during the night and I > had to restart the upgrade each time. Note that I failed to use the > restart flag recommended during the first restart. I finally ended up > with a "succesful upgrade..." message even though I now have only 188 > ports after beginning with 297. Amongst the missing is gnome 2.12 > itself. > > I'm hoping there is some way to get things back to normal and rerun > the upgrade without re-installing the missing ports. BTW, I did back > up /var/db/pkg. > > Any advice would be appreciated. I run 5.4 -RELEASE #0. I'm running > this message from a second machine but should be able to supply the > logs if needed. In the worst case, you should be able to delete all the Gnome-related ports and re-add them. [I did that on purpose, because my only Gnome machine is *so* much slower than my build server.] -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 13:21:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E824B16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:21:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sjtcons@iinet.net.au) Received: from ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony2.iinet.net.au (ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony2.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A9C43D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:21:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sjtcons@iinet.net.au) Received: from 203-59-18-12.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO [192.168.1.101]) ([203.59.18.12]) by ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony2.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2005 21:21:49 +0800 Message-ID: <4370A671.10106@iinet.net.au> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:21:53 +0800 From: Steven Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Problem with Microsoft USB Wireless Notebook Mouse X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:21:52 -0000 I have been trying for many nights now to get my Wireless Notebook mouse working under 6.0RC1. If anyone has any hints or clues as to how I can do this, please let me know. Thanks Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 13:25:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5F516A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:25:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (fw1.wmptl.com [216.8.159.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32FE43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:25:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA8DPQsp055435; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:25:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <4370A70F.8010305@wmptl.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:24:31 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jhall@vandaliamo.net References: <1758.12.170.206.13.1131435691.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> In-Reply-To: <1758.12.170.206.13.1131435691.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.111 () RATWR10_MESSID X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Hard Drive Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:25:24 -0000 What type of enclosure are you using, is the actual enclosure made by Western Digital? We use a 'generic' enclosure with a 250GB ATA Western Digital drive in it - and aside from not having USB 2.0 host/speed... it works quite well. Mounts as /dev/da1s1d. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > Recently, I purchased several Western Digital External Hard Drives to be > used for backup purposes. The test unit I purchased worked out of the > box, but I am having problems getting the newer ones to work. > > When they are plugged in to a FreeBSD 5.3 or 5.4 server, I receive the > following messages: > > Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: umass0: Western Digital External HDD, rev > 2.00/6.02 > Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: uhid0: Western Digital External HDD, rev > 2.00/6.02, addr2, iclass 8/6 > > This is where my confusion lies. From what I can see the hard drive is > detected properly as a umass device, but is also detected as a human input > device. And, the da device, which I think I will use to access the device > is not created. > > If I plug my memory stick into the USB port, the memory stick is detected > and I am able to access the device through da0. > > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Jay > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 13:36:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A78B16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:36:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net (smtp2.suscom.net [64.78.83.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61DF43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:36:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp2.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C454A1CD87F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:23:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 24124-07 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:23:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 23C2A1CD879 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:23:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA8DaUww010124 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:36:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:36:32 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051108082925.864D.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.22.02 [en] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: cyrus-sasl2 compile option X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:36:42 -0000 I found this notation on regarding cyrus-sasl on the FreeBSD site . This is a snippet of the article: Install security/cyrus-sasl from the ports. You can find this port in security/cyrus-sasl. security/cyrus-sasl has a number of compile time options to choose from and, for the method we will be using here, make sure to select the pwcheck option. Does this apply to cyrus-sasl2 as well? I tried 'make config' but that produced nothing. I do not see any option for the 'pwcheck' option in the Makefile. What, if any compile options should I include on the command line? I am running FreeBSD 5.4 at present. --=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 13:38:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8052C16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:38:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97D843D64 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:38:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x3so551740nzd for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 05:38:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mowK+tzbU8j1cKHLff8iEtmVxHlKrWwIVSdOvHapyGWi7xlSE+q1Jp4qaPHaXYctwpSnxj2tKM9TqxePMzL3gJ7gPmwev5O/unlMVgCSGsz1NkxHcua12rHBGZ3sCwNZYBX1tNvZdyVDOXD4b8e7kKbff+BaOx1PJEzta7quD5U= Received: by 10.36.153.14 with SMTP id a14mr2506418nze; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 05:38:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.12.2 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:38:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:38:00 -0500 From: Tsu-Fan Cheng To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: 5.4 to 6.0 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:38:13 -0000 Hi fbsder, I just upgraded my 5.4 to 6.0 last night and encounter some problems, pleas= e forgive me if this has already been brought up... I cvsup the source by changing RELENG_5 to RELENG_6, do the cvsup and follo= w the old routine (make buildowlrd.... mergemaster..), after reboot, I notice= d that (1) my system is still called FREEBSD 5.4, (2) pgrep: kvm_getprocs() failed.. ??? (3) my network (DHCP) doesn't work, "can't install write filter program: Invalid argument" any advice is appreciated... TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 13:48:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C167316A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:48:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (fw1.wmptl.com [216.8.159.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E644F43D72 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:48:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA8DmfMr056270 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:48:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <4370AC83.2010708@wmptl.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:47:47 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.111 () RATWR10_MESSID X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Cc: Subject: USB 2.0 Support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:48:46 -0000 We've been using an external USB hard disk enclosure with a 250GB Western Digital ATA-133 disk inside it. All works well, but our mainboard (MSI K8 Master) only has USB 1.1 on-board, we've tried a USB 2.0 PCI card, but it is apparently not picked up properly when the kernel boots. Do I need to disable the on-board USB, or are there only certain chipsets which FreeBSD supports for USB 2.0 ? The kernel apaprently detects the card (usb2/usb3 ), but it appears as 1.0, not 2.0; or is this the driver version? Anyhow, aside from picking it up, it does not detect the removeable drive nor are we able to use the USB 2.0 ports anyhow. USB 1.1 off the mainboard detects the drive fine, we're able to mount and use it with no problems accept a gruellingly slow transfer... USB 2.0 would really help here I'm hoping. We're running 6.0-RC1, with custom kernel (pretty much GENERIC -minus drivers we don't need, plus SMP), dmesg as follows: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 #0: Sat Oct 15 16:29:44 EDT 2005 root@wmptwo.wmptl.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/SMP Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 244 (1794.42-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xf5a Stepping = 10 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500800 real memory = 2146893824 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2062491648 (1966 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-27 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 28-31 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 15 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 11 on acpi0 unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x8008-0x800b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff,0x8000-0x807f,0x8080-0x80ff iomem 0xd8000-0xdbfff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 ohci0: mem 0xfb100000-0xfb100fff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci1 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xfb101000-0xfb101fff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci1 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered atapci0: port 0x2420-0x2427,0x2414-0x2417,0x2418-0x241f,0x2410-0x2413,0x2400-0x240f mem 0xfb105000-0xfb1053ff irq 16 at device 5.0 on pci1 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 ata4: on atapci0 ata5: on atapci0 pci1: at device 7.0 (no driver attached) ohci2: mem 0xfb103000-0xfb103fff irq 16 at device 9.0 on pci1 ohci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: OHCI version 1.0 usb2: on ohci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 1 port with 1 removable, self powered ohci3: mem 0xfb104000-0xfb104fff irq 17 at device 9.1 on pci1 ohci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: OHCI version 1.0 usb3: on ohci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 1 port with 1 removable, self powered isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x1000-0x100f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci1 ata1: on atapci1 pci0: at device 7.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 bge0: mem 0xfd010000-0xfd01ffff,0xfd000000-0xfd00ffff irq 26 at device 2.0 on pci2 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:11:09:a9:d7:9e bge1: mem 0xfd030000-0xfd03ffff,0xfd020000-0xfd02ffff irq 24 at device 2.1 on pci2 miibus1: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:11:09:a9:d7:9f pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.60.00.017 twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xfd100000-0xfd1000ff,0xfd800000-0xfdffffff irq 28 at device 1.0 on pci3 twa0: [FAST] twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: 4 ports, Firmware FE9X 2.04.00.005, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.047 pci0: at device 11.1 (no driver attached) atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xc97ff,0xc9800-0xcafff,0xcb000-0xcc7ff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found non-ATA66 cable acd0: CDRW at ata0-master UDMA33 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: <3ware Logical Disk 00 1.00> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 100.000MB/s transfers da0: 715224MB (1464778752 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 91178C) Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s2a bge0: link state changed to UP Thanks one-and-all -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:08:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E258316A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (fw1.wmptl.com [216.8.159.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BFF43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA8E8RCH057003 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:08:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <4370B124.1010103@wmptl.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:07:32 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.711 () J_CHICKENPOX_73,RATWR10_MESSID X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Cc: Subject: USB 2.0 Support (re-post, more info) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:08:22 -0000 I tried plugging the device in to all four ports on the USB 2.0 PCI Card, to no avail, no device/event is registered. I read the manpage on usbd, and it appears to be monitoring/watching for devices. I connect the device to one of the two ports on the mainboard, and I get this: uhub3: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 1 umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) umass0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected umass0: detached umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) da1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da1: 1.000MB/s transfers da1: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 19457C) Yet again, my transfer speed is limited to the USB 1.1 specification of this controller, and it's terribly slow to be pulling 100GB tar files off of :( ... 'ps -ax | grep usb' returns: $ ps ax | grep usb 52 ?? DL 0:00.02 [usb0] 53 ?? DL 0:00.00 [usbtask] 54 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb1] 55 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb2] 56 ?? DL 0:00.01 [usb3] 424 ?? Ss 0:00.23 /usr/sbin/usbd Is there something I'm doing wrong, is the controller not being picked up properly by the kernel, or is there something I can change in the configuration? Should I disable the on-board USB controller? Devices usb2, usb3 and their associated usb hubs are the USB 2.0 card, (at least appear as such, with it being the NEC chipset'ted card in PCI slot). Again, output of dmesg is as follows below. -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 #0: Sat Oct 15 16:29:44 EDT 2005 root@wmptwo.wmptl.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/SMP Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 244 (1794.42-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xf5a Stepping = 10 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500800 real memory = 2146893824 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2062491648 (1966 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-27 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 28-31 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 15 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 11 on acpi0 unknown: I/O range not supported unknown: I/O range not supported Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x8008-0x800b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff,0x8000-0x807f,0x8080-0x80ff iomem 0xd8000-0xdbfff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 6.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 ohci0: mem 0xfb100000-0xfb100fff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci1 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xfb101000-0xfb101fff irq 19 at device 0.1 on pci1 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: AMD OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered atapci0: port 0x2420-0x2427,0x2414-0x2417,0x2418-0x241f,0x2410-0x2413,0x2400-0x240f mem 0xfb105000-0xfb1053ff irq 16 at device 5.0 on pci1 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 ata4: on atapci0 ata5: on atapci0 pci1: at device 7.0 (no driver attached) ohci2: mem 0xfb103000-0xfb103fff irq 16 at device 9.0 on pci1 ohci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: OHCI version 1.0 usb2: on ohci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 1 port with 1 removable, self powered ohci3: mem 0xfb104000-0xfb104fff irq 17 at device 9.1 on pci1 ohci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: OHCI version 1.0 usb3: on ohci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 1 port with 1 removable, self powered isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x1000-0x100f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci1 ata1: on atapci1 pci0: at device 7.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 10.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 bge0: mem 0xfd010000-0xfd01ffff,0xfd000000-0xfd00ffff irq 26 at device 2.0 on pci2 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:11:09:a9:d7:9e bge1: mem 0xfd030000-0xfd03ffff,0xfd020000-0xfd02ffff irq 24 at device 2.1 on pci2 miibus1: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:11:09:a9:d7:9f pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.60.00.017 twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xfd100000-0xfd1000ff,0xfd800000-0xfdffffff irq 28 at device 1.0 on pci3 twa0: [FAST] twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: 4 ports, Firmware FE9X 2.04.00.005, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.047 pci0: at device 11.1 (no driver attached) atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xc97ff,0xc9800-0xcafff,0xcb000-0xcc7ff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found non-ATA66 cable acd0: CDRW at ata0-master UDMA33 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: <3ware Logical Disk 00 1.00> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 100.000MB/s transfers da0: 715224MB (1464778752 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 91178C) Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s2a bge0: link state changed to UP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:16:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0210816A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:16:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A69843D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:16:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836F521EA42 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:16:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78598-07 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:16:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05758222403 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:16:42 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:16:37 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> In-Reply-To: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2523822.tH1p7trfm5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511080816.41164.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: Major Error Upgrading to GNOME 2.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:16:52 -0000 --nextPart2523822.tH1p7trfm5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline My own horror story: ruby started throwing errors: INFO: Running /usr/local/sbin/pkg_deinstall -fO graphics/kimdaba [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 690 packages f= ound (-1 +0) (...)/usr/local/lib/rub y/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd6] halfway through the package removal process, but the gnome_upgrade212.sh script kept cheerfully chewing its way through my package list. I ended up looking in the list of packages that it was going to "fix", manually pkg_deleteing them, and then manually reinstalling them. Out of curiosity, exactly what's wrong with portupgrade that these upgrade scripts (which never seem to work as expected on my system) claim to fix? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2523822.tH1p7trfm5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDcLNJ5sRg+Y0CpvERAiGXAJwOyw/wlWZO4sAsTTJ8ctyZX+Q0WACgoezv X1/kBk4ZoxWdoScghFgBcb0= =nV3z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2523822.tH1p7trfm5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:33:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750F016A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:33:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EB643D53 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:33:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so656406wxc for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:33:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=IiAcoKX9g8oTUVZCi0zAS7uYlamQ4+i4vqvCwzO2pg/54SzzP0XCUtB79IoOiFhkWFXm2Jx5c1u+eAEqEDtR+9yHE+6Lf0g8lZC/oKTEx4KJJ8iNYDx5PP5fZPfaiDYbG4C71c1m9p4XHAGn79gHbox7wfcDQu+XpEV42JLUj6Q= Received: by 10.70.78.4 with SMTP id a4mr2883583wxb; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:33:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i39sm5412584wxd.2005.11.08.06.33.50; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:33:51 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:25:13 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> <200511080816.41164.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200511080816.41164.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511080625.14613.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Major Error Upgrading to GNOME 2.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:33:52 -0000 On Tuesday 08 November 2005 06:16, Kirk Strauser wrote: > My own horror story: ruby started throwing errors: > > INFO: Running /usr/local/sbin/pkg_deinstall -fO graphics/kimdaba > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 690 packages > found (-1 +0) (...)/usr/local/lib/rub y/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] > Segmentation fault > ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd6] > > halfway through the package removal process, but the gnome_upgrade212.sh > script kept cheerfully chewing its way through my package list. I ended > up looking in the list of packages that it was going to "fix", manually > pkg_deleteing them, and then manually reinstalling them. > > Out of curiosity, exactly what's wrong with portupgrade that these upgrade > scripts (which never seem to work as expected on my system) claim to fix? Not sure why the scripts arte needed, I do know portmanager 0.3.3 handles the upgrade no problem, no special scripts required. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:39:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EBA16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:39:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pujos.michael@laposte.net) Received: from mx.laposte.net (mx.laposte.net [81.255.54.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1DA43D55 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:39:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pujos.michael@laposte.net) Received: from [192.168.2.2] (82.230.168.233) by mx.laposte.net (7.2.060.1) (authenticated as pujos.michael) id 433BC54A02652333 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:39:29 +0100 From: Michael Pujos To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:39:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511081539.19631.pujos.michael@laposte.net> Subject: freebsd 6.0 install fails: SATA WRITE_DMA error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:39:37 -0000 Hi I wanted to try Freebsd 6.0 on a sony vaio laptop which has a 80Gb HDD drive with using this SATA controller: IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801FBM (ICH6M) SATA Controller (rev 04) I have this error when the installer try to write the partition table: ad4: detected unknown: TIMEOUT: WRITE_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=63 unknown: TIMEOUT: WRITE_DMA retrying (0 retry left) LBA=63 unknown: FAILURE: WRITE_DMA timed out I tried booting with set hw.ata.ata_dma=0 but it did nothing Note that before partitioning the installer complain about incorrect geometry and autoguess the CHS values...which are the same that reported by linux fdisk. I remember installing succesfully freebsd 5.1 or .2 a few month ago without problem... (please CC me any answer since i'm not subscribed to the list) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:39:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036F016A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:39:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5A243D70 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:39:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jA8Edi38016263; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:39:44 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jA8EdiPS016262; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:39:44 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200511081439.jA8EdiPS016262@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: asiercu@gmail.com (Asier Cuevas) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:39:44 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quota message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:39:48 -0000 > > Hello list, > > I have FreeBSD + SendMail + Option Quota enable. If a user disk quota > exceeded, I have receive this message: > > /var/mail/aj.bunyola: Disc quota exceeded > Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours Will keep trying > until message is 5 days old Well, you have to check some things. How much disk does user 'aj.bunyola' have filled up and what is it being used for. Maybe the mailbox is already huge or the user has saved some large mail files or whatever. The 'ls -l' and 'du -dk *' commands in appropriate directories will help with this. NOTE that quota is by file system and not just directories. So a user may be using disk in more than one place. You can also use find(1) to locate all the disk a user is occupying in a file system. What is user aj.bunyola quota set at. From root run 'quota -u af.bunyola' to find out what is set for each file system with quotas turned on. I suspect that the quota for this user might be set at some unreasonably low amount on the /var filesystem. You might not want quotas turned on for the /var filesystem if it is not part of another filesystem. > > How can modify this message? By either: - Turning off quotas on that file system - raising the user's quota - getting the user to clean out old files until their use gets below the quota. ////jerry > > Thanks > > PD: Sorry, my english is very bad. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:46:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A2716A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: from smtpout1.ywave.com (ycomradius.yelmtel.com [216.227.100.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74DE043D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micahjon@ywave.com) Received: (qmail 16150 invoked by uid 502); 8 Nov 2005 14:46:12 -0000 Received: from dsl28217.ywave.com (HELO ?192.168.1.65?) (micahjon@ywave.com@216.227.115.217) by 0 with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 14:46:12 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 216.227.115.217 X-CLIENT-HOST: dsl28217.ywave.com Message-ID: <4370BA33.6080400@ywave.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:46:11 -0800 From: Micah User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Perry References: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> In-Reply-To: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major Error Upgrading to GNOME 2.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:46:13 -0000 Bob Perry wrote: > This past weekend, I CVSup'd the ports tree and prepared to run > portupgrade. I noticed a large number of GNOME ports in my output from > pkg_version and, found that I would need to run the GNOME Project 's > upgrade script to upgrade to 2.12. > > I use a dial-up modem had been timed out on several occasions.during the > process This happened about three times during the night and I had to > restart the upgrade each time. Note that I failed to use the restart > flag recommended during the first restart. I finally ended up with a > "succesful upgrade..." message even though I now have only 188 ports > after beginning with 297. Amongst the missing is gnome 2.12 itself. > > I'm hoping there is some way to get things back to normal and rerun the > upgrade without re-installing the missing ports. BTW, I did back up > /var/db/pkg. > > Any advice would be appreciated. I run 5.4 -RELEASE #0. I'm running > this message from a second machine but should be able to supply the logs > if needed. > > Thanks, > Bob Perry > gnome_upgrade_lst.xxxx in your tmp folder should contain a list of all the software that the script was going to update. Compare that list with the output from pkg_version/portversion to see what needs reinstalling. Reinstall it via whatever method you like (portinstall, cd /user/port/xxx/xxx && make install). I am in a similar situation but I had the output from portversion from before the upgrade to rely on (and wrote a script that made a list of the differences). HTH, Micah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:46:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A38316A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83E843D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:46:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m22so546634nzf for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:46:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jPvq9aj04E+qUQ8F8/hp9FUHGIzmVEOC8YvWnl380Z7dR6WhFQchlgzncvSAo4ffFu8FJE4uh7WmuSSOmO40HmI6AasUFolAXP5kc1I+Sr/zsuP7oZJ2cXwB6qTtM8Deiuu7jMFtCwHFzwEBgwWuOOTtuEmpYviMavPoQ+OyFg8= Received: by 10.65.235.11 with SMTP id m11mr6621082qbr; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:46:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.253.2 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:46:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990511080646x76ca0b17n4c2939fc8f7c7df4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:46:20 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: Nathan Vidican In-Reply-To: <4370B124.1010103@wmptl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4370B124.1010103@wmptl.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB 2.0 Support (re-post, more info) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:46:24 -0000 On 11/8/05, Nathan Vidican wrote: > I tried plugging the device in to all four ports on the USB 2.0 PCI Card,= to > no > avail, no device/event is registered. I read the manpage on usbd, and it > appears > to be monitoring/watching for devices. I connect the device to one of the > two > ports on the mainboard, and I get this: > > > uhub3: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 1 > umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr = 2 > umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) > umass0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected > umass0: detached > umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr = 2 > umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) > da1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 devic= e > da1: 1.000MB/s transfers > da1: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 19457C) > > Yet again, my transfer speed is limited to the USB 1.1 specification of t= his > > controller, and it's terribly slow to be pulling 100GB tar files off of := ( USB 2.0 support is provided by the ehci(4) driver, which is not in a default install. It is also buggy, at least in 5.4-R. I use Firewire for large external drives. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:48:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C60C16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:48:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1501343D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:48:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jA8Eme38016313; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:48:40 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jA8Emd9n016312; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:48:39 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200511081448.jA8Emd9n016312@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: goodredhat@yahoo.com (manish jain) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:48:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20051108065848.22654.qmail@web34002.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:48:41 -0000 > > Hi, > > I am using FreeBSD 5.4 with an Intel 810 chipset which has an onboard > soundcard. While everything else works fine, the sound volume is > inexplicably low. I have set snd_ich_load to "YES" in loader.conf, which > is probably all I am required to do. Even when I use Volume Control to > set the PCM to maximum volume (with the 800 W speakers too set to maximum > volume), sound is barely audible in multimedia applications like xmms > and xine. What could possibly be wrong ? Well, are they really 800 watt just speakers or are they powered speakers? If they are just speakers, then your soundcard will not put out enough to power them. If those speakers can actually absorb 800 watt, it will take some bigger current to drive them. You need to run the signal through an amplifier. Now, if they are powered speakers - meaning they have their own built in amplifier, then check them out by running a line level feed from something else to make sure they are on and OK. Make sure it is a line out from something and not the powered output of another amplifier - or even the headphone out, though you could probably use that (headphone out) turned way down if it is all you have available. If the speakers are OK, then you are back to figuring out the sound card and software. ////jerry > > Thanks for any help. > Manish Jain > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:57:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF05C16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:57:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0EF43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:57:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 156 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 14:57:58 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail25.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Nov 2005 14:57:58 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A4F0328441; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:57:57 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4370A083.7050909@email.t-com.hr> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Nov 2005 09:57:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4370A083.7050909@email.t-com.hr> Message-ID: <44lkzznq4q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: fanijak Subject: Re: seti at home 3.08 instal problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:58:00 -0000 fanijak writes: > I recently instal the seti at home version 3.08 and I have a problem. > [Error -40;0] and I can not connect to the server. > How to resolve this problem ? That's outdated. Use the boinc-setiathome port instead. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 14:58:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E71A16A421 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:58:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7737C43D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:58:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jA8EwN38016338; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:58:23 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jA8EwNve016337; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:58:23 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200511081458.jA8EwNve016337@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: lists@servingpeace.com (Sam Nilsson) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:58:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <437033AD.3050803@servingpeace.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ansar Mohammed , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Release vs Stable vs Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:58:25 -0000 > > Ansar Mohammed wrote: > > Has the terminology for "production ready" FreeBSD changed? > > > > Is FreeBSD Release now considered Stable? > > I don't think so, no. "Stable" refers to the branch of development from > which Production releases are made. Right now that is the FreeBSD 6 > branch. Future point releases of FreeBSD 6 will be made from the Stable > branch until the time that FreeBSD 6 becomes a legacy release. Unfortunately, I think the word "stable" is getting used in a different way in the question and the answer. Releases are stable in the generic sense of the word - they are thought to be reliable and fixed in to a particular condition, not fluctuating with development. But STABLE as a "version" I think really means a particular snapshot along the way. Things are not necessarily frozen in to a version for that particular snapshot. It is kind of up to you to make sure all the ports and such that you need work with it. It becomes a RELEASE when a particular stable snapshot is fixed as a release and everything frozen long enough to get it all brought to that specific working version. So, in a sense RELEASE is more stable than STABLE. Or, at least, it is more complete. This may be fudging the explanation a little. Someone else might be able to correct it or make a better explanation. ////jerry > > - Sam > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 15:08:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D146A16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:08:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25F6543D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:08:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 24832 invoked by uid 0); 8 Nov 2005 15:08:17 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (69.73.60.132) by smtp1.knology.net with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 15:08:17 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 3A4BE6232; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:08:17 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:08:17 -0600 From: David Kelly To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20051108150817.GA47825@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: devfs and bpf owner, group, and mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:08:20 -0000 I'm having problems in 5.4 getting automatic ownership and mode correct on /dev/bpf2. Added this to /etc/devfs.conf: # Allow group tcpdump to use bpf* own bpf0 root:tcpdump perm bpf0 0660 own bpf1 root:tcpdump perm bpf1 0660 own bpf2 root:tcpdump perm bpf2 0660 And this to /etc/devfs.rules: [devfsrules_bpf=5] add path 'bpf*' mode 0660 group tcpdump The intent is to allow members of group "tcpdump" to use /dev/bpf2 without being root. The above creates /dev/bpf[012] as desired at boot but some time later /dev/bpf2 disappears. System has two NICs, xl0 and fxp0. At this time fxp0 is not being used. Vlan0 is configured (as a VLAN of course) on xl0, and thats where I need /dev/bpf2 for tcpdump to see what my stuff is doing. If missing, /dev/bpf2 is created automatically when tcpdump opens, but its not created with the same ownership and mode as during reboot. Suspect my problem is related to [devfsrules_bpf=5] or the fact I haven't informed the system to apply this rule to the /dev filesystem. So where is the 'i' that I've failed to dot? -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 15:15:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A87A16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:15:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fteg@london.com) Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing2.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F11043D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:15:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fteg@london.com) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id BDB7F1800307 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:15:04 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.49) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 8 Nov 2005 15:14:59 -0000 Received: by ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 787C483C0A; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:14:59 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Fafa Hafiz Krantz" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:14:57 -0500 Received: from [213.187.181.70] by ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com with http for fteg@london.com; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:14:57 -0500 X-Originating-Ip: 213.187.181.70 X-Originating-Server: ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20051108151459.787C483C0A@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> Cc: Subject: Failure: make world: from 5.4 to 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:15:05 -0000 Hello. Anybody know what's going on? I tried upgrading but I get this. Then I removed /usr/obj and /usr/src and I still get that: In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:97: error: syntax error before "eC= har" /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:97: warning: data definition has n= o type or storage class In file included from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.h:1304, from /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/gethost.c:33: /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.decls.h:221: error: syntax error bef= ore "readc" /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.decls.h:221: warning: data definitio= n has no type or storage class *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/bin/csh. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Thanks. -- Fafa Hafiz Krantz Research Designer @ http://www.bleed.com --=20 ___________________________________________________ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 15:16:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E66316A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:16:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F3A643D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:16:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 28750 invoked by uid 1006); 8 Nov 2005 15:16:49 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:SA:0(-3.0/100.0):. Processed in 3.030042 secs); 08 Nov 2005 15:16:49 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (10.75.0.10) by -v with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 15:16:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 6014 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 15:13:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 15:13:50 -0000 Received: from 199.223.158.225 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:13:50 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1221.199.223.158.225.1131462830.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> In-Reply-To: <4370A70F.8010305@wmptl.com> References: <1758.12.170.206.13.1131435691.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <4370A70F.8010305@wmptl.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:13:50 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: "Nathan Vidican" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Hard Drive Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:16:51 -0000 The actual enclosure is made by Western Digital. If I run usbdevs I receive the following output. addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel addr 1: EHCI root hub, Intel addr 2: External HDD, Western Digital I'm guessing the device would be /dev/da0s1. Thanks for your help. Jay > What type of enclosure are you using, is the actual enclosure made by > Western > Digital? We use a 'generic' enclosure with a 250GB ATA Western Digital > drive in > it - and aside from not having USB 2.0 host/speed... it works quite well. > Mounts > as /dev/da1s1d. > > -- > Nathan Vidican > nvidican@wmptl.com > Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. > http://www.wmptl.com/ > > > jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> Recently, I purchased several Western Digital External Hard Drives to be >> used for backup purposes. The test unit I purchased worked out of the >> box, but I am having problems getting the newer ones to work. >> >> When they are plugged in to a FreeBSD 5.3 or 5.4 server, I receive the >> following messages: >> >> Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: umass0: Western Digital External HDD, rev >> 2.00/6.02 >> Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: uhid0: Western Digital External HDD, rev >> 2.00/6.02, addr2, iclass 8/6 >> >> This is where my confusion lies. From what I can see the hard drive is >> detected properly as a umass device, but is also detected as a human >> input >> device. And, the da device, which I think I will use to access the >> device >> is not created. >> >> If I plug my memory stick into the USB port, the memory stick is >> detected >> and I am able to access the device through da0. >> >> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> Jay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 15:25:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A15516A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:25:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bloodyveins@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB62B43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:24:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bloodyveins@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so385415nzo for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:24:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NqeDbsOiN+GFL00piusm5KBuqfxNoo4c4BPe7UioWyl61nXNfEZKvT93yXWiiw9oiiOkDyr6z5yp6gosy5WIVV9sTO3uERpe2+rlFnA5aEOeljr0JajhbUAXP4zIa9IROk7O7rcwT7EfmTN1tJk6nwIBwwy5sM7veFeAfVVWilI= Received: by 10.36.221.49 with SMTP id t49mr1652457nzg; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:24:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.129.13 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:24:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <58ebaa710511080724uf70c93fma89daebd4d9e24b9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:24:59 +0700 From: Mike Fern To: Charlie McElfresh In-Reply-To: <20051106211756.78895.qmail@web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051106211756.78895.qmail@web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't install php5-dba port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:25:00 -0000 do you run both php 5 and php 4? this could be the problem when your apache config file still points to php 4 module. On 11/7/05, Charlie McElfresh wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running php 5.05, apache 2.053, on FreeBSD > 5.4-RELEASE. > > When I try to install the port (from the ports > collection) > > php5-dba > > I get this message: > > =3D=3D=3D> php5-dba-5.0.3_2 is marked as broken: Doesn't > work with PHP version : 4 (Doesn't support PHP 4). > > Help appreciated. > > Charlie > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 15:51:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F34E16A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:51:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCB143D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:51:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1EZVlB-0007Lg-SX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:51:47 +0300 Message-ID: <4370C980.6020502@speechpro.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:51:28 +0300 From: Igor Robul User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051018) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: PS/2 keyboard don't work in FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:51:55 -0000 Andrew Diakin wrote: >Hi, I try ti install FreeBSD 6.0 Release but my Microsoft PS/2 >keyboard don't work at all. At beta2 it work about 2 minutes... Has >anybody the same trouble? > > Try booting with ACPI disabled. I had trouble on i815LE MSI motherboard and PS/2 mouse with 5.3 and ACPI. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 16:04:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3625916A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:04:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58C343D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:04:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 28005 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 16:04:13 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Nov 2005 16:04:12 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 70F0228441; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:04:10 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200511081458.jA8EwNve016337@clunix.cl.msu.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Nov 2005 11:04:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200511081458.jA8EwNve016337@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Message-ID: <44lkzzi0sm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 6 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Release vs Stable vs Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:04:14 -0000 Jerry McAllister writes: > This may be fudging the explanation a little. Someone else might be > able to correct it or make a better explanation. And put it in the FAQ. Years ago. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 15:41:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F6116A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:41:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mgolunov@list.ru) Received: from f9.mail.ru (f9.mail.ru [194.67.57.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1077D43D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:41:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mgolunov@list.ru) Received: from mail by f9.mail.ru with local id 1EZVbC-000BmZ-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:41:26 +0300 Received: from [85.116.123.115] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:41:26 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?Q?=ED=C1=CB=D3=C9=CD=20=E7=CF=CC=D5=CE=CF=D7?= To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [85.116.123.115] Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:41:26 +0300 X-Priority: 1 (High) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:04:32 +0000 Cc: Subject: NFS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?Q?=ED=C1=CB=D3=C9=CD=20=E7=CF=CC=D5=CE=CF=D7?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:41:28 -0000 Hello friends. How do you do? 1) I've got any problems with mac-biba and mac-mls. I used only mac-biba and mac-mls from family of mac-policy. I want to set up NFS. And I could do it, really, I needed switch off mac-policy on NFS-server. When I use mac-policy on NFS-server, NFS-client reported "RPCPROG-NFS: ports map failure...: time out" after command "mount_nfs...". I'm repeating, if switch off mac-policy on NFS-server, then NFS good work. How will I need to change settings to good work NFS? 2) The firm ,when I work, downloaded all packages from ftp.freebsd.org (11Gb). My task is to place all packages in NFS-server. When NFS-client is trying to open NFS-directory with all packages, it reported "server:/... is not responding". I'm sure, this mistake is shown because the directory has got many files. If a directory has got some files, NFS-client is opening this directory. How will I need to change settings to correct work NFS? 3) The next problem is how can write in directories on NFS-server. I read that root from NFS-client can write in directories on NFS-server by default. I was trying and I wrote some small files in NFS-server, but when I was writing file with size more 1 Mb, NFS-client was broken. I must was rebooting a machine. How will I need to change settings to can write in directories on NFS-server? Whit the best regards from MAX. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 16:18:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EB416A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:18:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA87A43D5A for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:18:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA8GIUxj018218; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:18:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8E6E3B822; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:18:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:18:30 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Tsu-Fan Cheng Message-ID: <20051108161830.GA14225@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Tsu-Fan Cheng , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 to 6.0 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:18:33 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Hi fbsder, > I just upgraded my 5.4 to 6.0 last night and encounter some problems, ple= ase > forgive me if this has already been brought up... > I cvsup the source by changing RELENG_5 to RELENG_6, do the cvsup and fol= low > the old routine (make buildowlrd.... mergemaster..), after reboot, I noti= ced > that > (1) my system is still called FREEBSD 5.4, > (2) pgrep: kvm_getprocs() failed.. ??? > (3) my network (DHCP) doesn't work, "can't install write filter program: > Invalid argument" >=20 > any advice is appreciated... Did you build and installed a new kernel as well? See /usr/src/UPDATING, lines 265 - 297; "To rebuild everything and install it on the current syste= m" Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDcM/WEnfvsMMhpyURAsdiAJ925XRYm7Wt9nTp+56sgiEmJ4x3cwCeNwRz J+mn9wYRLgb/bURz5lgL750= =Hp6a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 16:29:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5843B16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:29:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fanijak@email.t-com.hr) Received: from ls405.htnet.hr (ls405.htnet.hr [195.29.150.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4459A43D58 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:29:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fanijak@email.t-com.hr) Received: from ls401.t-com.hr (ls401.t-com.hr [195.29.150.236]) by ls405.htnet.hr (0.0.0/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jA8GSwX3028663 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:29:06 +0100 Received: from ls401.t-com.hr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ls401.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 8DA4370003 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:29:06 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender: fanijak@email.t-com.hr Received: from [127.0.0.1] (83-131-177-34.adsl.net.t-com.hr [83.131.177.34]) by ls401.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 2668FA8014 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:29:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4370D40F.4070506@email.t-com.hr> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:36:31 +0100 From: fanijak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000103060403090804070103" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: RAM question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:29:11 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000103060403090804070103 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Haw meani memory RAM is consumed by boing ? I heave aproxsimaly 512RAM. --------------000103060403090804070103-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 17:03:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999BB16A43D for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:03:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450AB43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:03:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 4856 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 17:03:24 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Nov 2005 17:03:24 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C376F28441; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:03:23 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Josh Tolbert References: <20051108081941.GA27333@just.puresimplicity.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Nov 2005 12:03:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051108081941.GA27333@just.puresimplicity.net> Message-ID: <44hdanhy1w.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 31 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unusual permissions on /var/named/etc/namedb/master? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:03:25 -0000 Josh Tolbert writes: > Hello, > > I'm running DHCP + dynamic DNS here on my home LAN and I've noticed a problem > that needs a manual fix every time the DNS machine gets rebooted. It doesn't > happen very often, but it does happen. :) > > My firewall/gateway machine runs FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE of some patchlevel. It > uses ISC DHCPD from ports to update my DNS server, another FreeBSD machine > (now running 6.0-RELEASE) with new entries when machines register with the > DHCP server. The problem arises because by default named runs -u bind, however > /var/named/etc/namedb/master is owned by root. I believe this is caused by > /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist, since I'm running bind chrooted (the default > setup). When the DNS machine reboots, I have to manually chown > /var/named/etc/namedb/master (or /etc/namedb/master) to bind before updates > will continue, otherwise I see errors such as > > named[297]: dumping master file: master/tmp-QQ2UU6pWaZ: open: permission denied > > Is there any good workaround for this issue? I'd like to keep bind running as > the bind user as well as keep bind chrooted if possible. I know I could edit > the mtree file on my machine, but that seems somewhat kludgy to me. > > Thanks for any help/advice you can give me, Normally mtree is only automatically run by installworld. Is that what causes the permissions to be reverted? If so, then change the mtree file (and keep the modifications over time when you run mergemaster). If not, then figure out what *is* changing the permissions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 17:09:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D489216A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:09:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9EC43D4C for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:09:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-43-91.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.43.91]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id jA8H9bYF029028 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:09:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <004c01c5e486$23d5c550$0900a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:02:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: bruteforce not restarting pf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:09:42 -0000 Hello, I've got a machine running 5.4, offering ssh services and running bruteforce. In my daily security log emails i am seeing entries like: Nov 7 07:06:55 zeus sshd[24747]: Failed password for illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 port 56265 ssh2 Nov 7 07:06:58 zeus sshd[24749]: Failed password for illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 port 56319 ssh2 Nov 7 07:07:01 zeus sshd[24751]: Failed password for root from 163.13.111.172 port 56376 ssh2 Nov 7 07:07:03 zeus sshd[24753]: Failed password for root from 163.13.111.172 port 56418 ssh2 Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Failed password for illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 port 56461 ssh2 Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Failed password for illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 port 56504 ssh2 Nov 7 07:07:10 zeus sshd[24761]: Failed password for root from 163.13.111.172 port 56543 ssh2 Nov 7 07:07:12 zeus sshd[24763]: Failed password for root from 163.13.111.172 port 56589 ... I know these are automated atempts at entry but i thought bruteforce was suppose to stop these. In my auth.log i do see the IP being added, but connections are still allowed. Here's the snipet: Nov 7 06:54:52 zeus sshd[24687]: fatal: Timeout before authentication for 163.13.111.172 Nov 7 07:06:55 zeus sshd[24747]: Illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 Nov 7 07:06:55 zeus sshd[24747]: Failed password for illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 port 56265 ssh2 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 1. Nov 7 07:06:58 zeus sshd[24749]: Illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 Nov 7 07:06:58 zeus sshd[24749]: Failed password for illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 port 56319 ssh2 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 2. Nov 7 07:07:01 zeus sshd[24751]: Failed password for root from 163.13.111.172 port 56376 ssh2 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 3. Nov 7 07:07:03 zeus sshd[24753]: Failed password for root from 163.13.111.172 port 56418 ssh2 IP 163.13.111.172 reached the maximum number of failed attempts!!! Adding IP to the firewall... Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Failed password for illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 port 56461 ssh2 Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Failed password for illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 port 56504 ssh2 Nov 7 07:07:10 zeus sshd[24761]: Failed password for root from 163.13.111.172 port 56543 ssh2 Checking my bruteforce table ;i see 163.13.111.172/32 in it, so it was added, but i don't get why future connections were permitted unless pf was not restarted or informed about the updated table. In my pf.conf file i have: table persist file "/etc/bruteforce" set block-policy drop block in log quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from to any port ssh Any help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 17:10:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C6916A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F76843D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from egypt.therub.org (therub.org [209.98.146.43]) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E928396 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:10:19 -0600 (CST) Received: by egypt.therub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7BF1645677A; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:10:19 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:10:19 -0600 From: Dan Rue To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051108171019.GF27437@therub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Hi - I have question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:10:23 -0000 On Tue Nov 1 06:10:18 PST 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2005-10-31 18:42, Nataly Afek wrote: >> 1) I'm working with Freebsd 5.3 and i want to know >> when will the support of this version will be finished? > >5.3-RELEASE was an "early adopter" release. Sice then, a lot of >important bugs have been fixed in the RELENG_5 branch. You should >definitely try updating to a newer version, like 5.4-RELEASE or even >5-STABLE, as soon as possible. This is bad advise. 5.3 was not an early adopter release - it was the first stable/production release of the 5 branch. Furthermore, according to http://www.freebsd.org/security/, it is support until at least October 31, 2006. The original poster just has to update 5.3 to get the latest security updates according to the handbook. And lastly, it is bad advise to upgrade to 5-STABLE. 5-STABLE is the 5 development branch, and should not be run unless you know better. General users should stick with releases. In this case, the original poster's options are stay with 5.3 (and probably grab the security updates), upgrade to 5.4, or to 6.0. Dan. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 17:30:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2609E16A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:30:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ke.han@redstarling.com) Received: from smtp103.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp103.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD63543D58 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:30:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ke.han@redstarling.com) Received: (qmail 18620 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 17:29:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (jhancock@patternware.com@218.79.213.163 with plain) by smtp103.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 17:29:35 -0000 Message-ID: <4370E07F.5030309@redstarling.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 01:29:35 +0800 From: "ke.han" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: receiving serial console output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:30:26 -0000 I need to capture output from the 3rd phase boot of freeBSD 6. I have a new server (which is the pc whose output needs capturing) and a laptop with freeBSD 6 working well. I have read the handbook section http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html The handbook seems thorough on this subject, but not quite the "howto" that a newbie like me requires. From my reading, I distill my process as: 1 - connect a null modem cable between server and laptop. ok, I can do this. 2 - at the server boot loader prompt, enter the command: set console="comconsole" 3 - then enter command: boot 4 - now what?? I assume there is some software and setting to use on the laptop to receive the output from the server console??? I am happy just to receive it all to a file if that is easy enough. Can someone please supply the missing link?? thanks, ke han From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 17:40:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1687816A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:40:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC8443D69 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:40:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386A4150052 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:40:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13748-01-73 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:40:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A5F315005D for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:40:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (//gerard [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA8HeC4R032809 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:40:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:40:14 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <004c01c5e486$23d5c550$0900a8c0@satellite> References: <004c01c5e486$23d5c550$0900a8c0@satellite> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20051108123712.3597.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.22.02 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: bruteforce not restarting pf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:40:22 -0000 On Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:02:02 PM, "Dave" Subject: bruteforce not restarting pf? Wrote these words of wisdom: > Hello, > I've got a machine running 5.4, offering ssh services and running > bruteforce. In my daily security log emails i am seeing entries like: > > Nov 7 07:06:55 zeus sshd[24747]: Failed password for illegal user miha from > 163.13.111.172 port 56265 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:06:58 zeus sshd[24749]: Failed password for illegal user miha from > 163.13.111.172 port 56319 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:01 zeus sshd[24751]: Failed password for root from > 163.13.111.172 port 56376 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:03 zeus sshd[24753]: Failed password for root from > 163.13.111.172 port 56418 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Failed password for illegal user simon > from 163.13.111.172 port 56461 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Failed password for illegal user simon > from 163.13.111.172 port 56504 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:10 zeus sshd[24761]: Failed password for root from > 163.13.111.172 port 56543 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:12 zeus sshd[24763]: Failed password for root from > 163.13.111.172 port 56589 > ... > > I know these are automated atempts at entry but i thought bruteforce was > suppose to stop these. In my auth.log i do see the IP being added, but > connections are still allowed. Here's the snipet: > > Nov 7 06:54:52 zeus sshd[24687]: fatal: Timeout before authentication for > 163.13.111.172 > Nov 7 07:06:55 zeus sshd[24747]: Illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 > Nov 7 07:06:55 zeus sshd[24747]: Failed password for illegal user miha from > 163.13.111.172 port 56265 ssh2 > 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 1. > Nov 7 07:06:58 zeus sshd[24749]: Illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 > Nov 7 07:06:58 zeus sshd[24749]: Failed password for illegal user miha from > 163.13.111.172 port 56319 ssh2 > 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 2. > Nov 7 07:07:01 zeus sshd[24751]: Failed password for root from > 163.13.111.172 port 56376 ssh2 > 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 3. > Nov 7 07:07:03 zeus sshd[24753]: Failed password for root from > 163.13.111.172 port 56418 ssh2 > IP 163.13.111.172 reached the maximum number of failed attempts!!! > Adding IP to the firewall... > Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 > Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Failed password for illegal user simon > from 163.13.111.172 port 56461 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 > Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Failed password for illegal user simon > from 163.13.111.172 port 56504 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:10 zeus sshd[24761]: Failed password for root from > 163.13.111.172 port 56543 ssh2 > > Checking my bruteforce table ;i see 163.13.111.172/32 in it, so it was > added, but i don't get why future connections were permitted unless pf was > not restarted or informed about the updated table. In my pf.conf file i > have: > > table persist file "/etc/bruteforce" > set block-policy drop > block in log quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from to any port > ssh > > Any help appreciated. > Thanks. > Dave. > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: You might want to check out this URL: http://danger.rulez.sk/projects/bruteforceblocker/ Perhaps you might be able to glom something of value there. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net A: Because it reverses the natural flow of a dialog. Q: Why is top posting undesirable when replying? TOPIC: Posting Etiquette From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 17:47:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98EA16A421 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:47:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from smtp1.linkline.com (smtp1.linkline.com [66.59.235.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0110143D66 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:47:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jellis@dhnet.us) Received: from [64.30.211.58] (64-30-211-58.dsl.linkline.com [64.30.211.58]) by smtp1.linkline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A67A9CF0C; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:47:00 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811 Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:47:00 -0800 From: Jeffrey Ellis To: David Fleck , FreeBSD questions Message-ID: Thread-Topic: How to sort find results Thread-Index: AcXkjGt/qcRqOlB/EdqYJgAKlXMBfA== In-Reply-To: <20051108065038.R3084@grond.sourballs.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:47:05 -0000 Hi, David-- That did it! Thank you :) So, now when I run it I get the following output: # ./date_sort /desktop Sep 13 11:10:34 2005 /desktop/.localized Nov 8 09:12:40 2005 /desktop/date_sort But there are actually 76 items on my desktop. Is it possible I'm not specifying an option correctly? Thanks again :) All My Best, Jeffrey on 11/8/05 5:31 AM, David Fleck at david.fleck@mchsi.com wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Jeffrey Ellis wrote: >> It's on my Desktop. Should it be in particular location? (Don't say it... >> Something obvious, right ;) > > It doesn't have to be anywhere in particular, as long as you can find it > when you want to run it. When you typed > >>> #head date_sort >>> head: date_sort: No such file or directory > > I assume that the date_sort script wasn't in the directory you were > running the 'head' command from. In this case, you'd have to run it as > > #head /full/path/to/date_sort > > otherwise 'head' won't be able to find date_sort. > >> I actually did see his email. I've checked the copy/paste of the script, and >> it looks like all carriage returns. I don't know how to type line feeds... >> Is that what they should be? > > The problem is that Windows and UNIX have different concepts of how to end > lines. Windows (and some mail programs, and possibly some web servers - > I'm just guessing here) think each line of a text-mode should end with a > carriage return (CR) followed by a line feed (LF). UNIX doesn't > distinguish between text-mode and binary-mode files, and thinks a line > should end with just an LF, and the CR is retained as extra junk at the > end of the line. > > The easiest way that I know of to check for and handle this problem (which > may not be the easiest way to handle it, but it's the one I'm familiar > with) is to use the 'vi' editor. I don't know if you're familiar with > 'vi'; it can be a little confusing to the uninitiated. The following > should step you through it -- make a backup of the date_sort file first. > > 1. cd to the directory containing date_sort. > > 2. Open the file in vi: > #vi date_sort > > 3. Type the following, where [Ctrl] means the Ctrl key, and [Enter] means > the Enter key: > > :%s/[Ctrl]V[Enter]//[Enter] > > 4. Save the result: > :wq[Enter] > > Now, hopefully, the CR-LF's have all been converted to LF's. Try running > the script again (personally, I'd test it on a smaller directory structure > than /, just to see if it works -- running it on / will probably take a > long while). > > The output of 'head /path/to/date_sort' may still be useful, btw. > > -- > David Fleck > david.fleck@mchsi.com > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 18:00:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5118616A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:00:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF7843D4C for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:00:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (67-51-164-214.dsl1.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [67.51.164.214]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC726358604 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [165.107.42.123] (unknown [165.107.42.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092561541A0 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:00:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4370E7AB.5000401@mykitchentable.net> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:00:11 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Subject: Disk Access Seems Slow in 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:00:25 -0000 I have two boxes running FBSD. One is an old AMD 350 mhz machine with just 128 MB of RAM and a 4 GB IDE drive that's attached to a 33mhz controller. The other is a dual Pentium 600 machine with 768 MB RAM and two 9 GB SCSI drives. Ever since I upgraded the dual Pentium from 4.11 to 5.4, disk access seems slower. I can't know for sure because I never did any benchmarking before. I used vinum striping in 4.x but moved to gstripe in 5.4. I notice it most when using an IMAP client to connect to Courier on this 5.4 machine. So maybe it's just slow with small files? Here's my 'gstripe list' output so you can see how the stripe set is built: --- BEGIN --- blacklamb# gstripe list Geom name: data State: UP Status: Total=2, Online=2 Type: AUTOMATIC Stripesize: 131072 ID: 1477809630 Providers: 1. Name: stripe/data Mediasize: 17160732672 (16G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e0 Consumers: 1. Name: da1s1d Mediasize: 8580481024 (8.0G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 Number: 1 2. Name: da0s1d Mediasize: 8580481024 (8.0G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 Number: 0 --- END --- I really don't know what to check or how to go about checking it. I Googled and found that bonnie++ seems to be popular. Another is postmark. I installed these tools and ran them both on my 5.4 server with the SCSI drives and the 4.11 server with the slow 33mhz IDE drive in it. Using default settings, postmark shows the 5.4 box about 2 1/2 times slower than the 4.11 box. --- BEGIN 5.4 Box --- Creating files...Done Performing transactions..........Done Deleting files...Done Time: 24 seconds total 9 seconds of transactions (55 per second) Files: 764 created (31 per second) Creation alone: 500 files (100 per second) Mixed with transactions: 264 files (29 per second) 243 read (27 per second) 257 appended (28 per second) 764 deleted (31 per second) Deletion alone: 528 files (52 per second) Mixed with transactions: 236 files (26 per second) Data: 1.36 megabytes read (58.22 kilobytes per second) 4.45 megabytes written (189.70 kilobytes per second) --- END 5.4 Box --- --- BEGIN 4.11 Box --- pm>run Creating files...Done Performing transactions..........Done Deleting files...Done Time: 10 seconds total 4 seconds of transactions (125 per second) Files: 764 created (76 per second) Creation alone: 500 files (100 per second) Mixed with transactions: 264 files (66 per second) 243 read (60 per second) 257 appended (64 per second) 764 deleted (76 per second) Deletion alone: 528 files (528 per second) Mixed with transactions: 236 files (59 per second) Data: 1.36 megabytes read (139.72 kilobytes per second) 4.45 megabytes written (455.28 kilobytes per second) --- END 4.11 Box --- I also ran bonnie++ on both boxes Here's ouput from the 5.4 box Version 1.93c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP blacklamb 300M 39 99 9115 18 8273 20 107 99 112354 99 2306 207 Latency 329ms 129ms 314ms 150ms 1557us 2365ms Version 1.93c ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- blacklamb -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 75 3 19237 99 116 3 75 3 19069 99 185 6 Latency 384ms 212us 260ms 209ms 662us 464ms And here's from the 4.11 box: Version 1.93c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP blacksheep 300M 47 96 4262 8 1954 5 101 96 4442 5 68.2 5 Latency 705ms 532ms 442ms 265ms 291ms 9196ms Version 1.93c ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- blacksheep -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 3806 62 12911 78 9469 91 3644 57 15577 99 2940 29 Latency 342ms 13128us 658us 247ms 644us 714ms I don't really know what all of this means. However the 4.11 box finished both tests much faster than the 5.4 box. Thus it seems I have a drive performance issue. What should I do to improve performance on the 5.4 box? I'm getting ready to upgrade to 6.0 and see this as an opportunity to modify the disk parameters if needed. Thanks, Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 18:13:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B355416A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:13:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21A7243D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:13:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 7738 invoked by uid 1006); 8 Nov 2005 18:13:28 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:SA:0(-0.8/100.0):. Processed in 2.025459 secs); 08 Nov 2005 18:13:28 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (10.75.0.11) by -v with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 18:13:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 19250 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 18:13:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 18:13:25 -0000 Received: from 199.223.158.225 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:13:25 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1977.199.223.158.225.1131473605.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> In-Reply-To: <4370A70F.8010305@wmptl.com> References: <1758.12.170.206.13.1131435691.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <4370A70F.8010305@wmptl.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:13:25 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: "Nathan Vidican" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Hard Drive Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:13:32 -0000 What I have found is that if I boot with the USB HDD attached to the system, the system will hang when starting to mount the file systems. However, if I connect the drive after the system is booted, everything is fine. da0 appears, etc. What should I be looking at to make the system boot with the external hard drive attached? Thanks, Jay > What type of enclosure are you using, is the actual enclosure made by > Western > Digital? We use a 'generic' enclosure with a 250GB ATA Western Digital > drive in > it - and aside from not having USB 2.0 host/speed... it works quite well. > Mounts > as /dev/da1s1d. > > -- > Nathan Vidican > nvidican@wmptl.com > Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. > http://www.wmptl.com/ > > > jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> Recently, I purchased several Western Digital External Hard Drives to be >> used for backup purposes. The test unit I purchased worked out of the >> box, but I am having problems getting the newer ones to work. >> >> When they are plugged in to a FreeBSD 5.3 or 5.4 server, I receive the >> following messages: >> >> Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: umass0: Western Digital External HDD, rev >> 2.00/6.02 >> Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: uhid0: Western Digital External HDD, rev >> 2.00/6.02, addr2, iclass 8/6 >> >> This is where my confusion lies. From what I can see the hard drive is >> detected properly as a umass device, but is also detected as a human >> input >> device. And, the da device, which I think I will use to access the >> device >> is not created. >> >> If I plug my memory stick into the USB port, the memory stick is >> detected >> and I am able to access the device through da0. >> >> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> Jay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 18:17:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C5716A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:17:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pujos.michael@laposte.net) Received: from mx.laposte.net (mx.laposte.net [81.255.54.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9D343D53 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:17:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pujos.michael@laposte.net) Received: from [192.168.2.2] (82.230.168.233) by mx.laposte.net (7.2.060.1) (authenticated as pujos.michael) id 433BC7760281B463 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:17:44 +0100 From: Michael Pujos To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:17:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511081539.19631.pujos.michael@laposte.net> <1131461710.83788.1.camel@siseci.gdg.gov.tr> In-Reply-To: <1131461710.83788.1.camel@siseci.gdg.gov.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511081917.35049.pujos.michael@laposte.net> Subject: Re: freebsd 6.0 install fails: SATA WRITE_DMA error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:17:46 -0000 On Tuesday 08 November 2005 15:55, you wrote: > Hi, > > Did you try disabling ACPI? > I just tried and same problem :/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 18:26:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9BD16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:26:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFEF43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:26:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-43-91.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.43.91]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id jA8IQOXV012882 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:26:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <005b01c5e490$dd466990$0900a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: References: <004c01c5e486$23d5c550$0900a8c0@satellite> <20051108123712.3597.GERARD@seibercom.net> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:18:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: bruteforce not restarting pf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:26:27 -0000 Hi, Thanks for your reply. I checked out the site and my configuration is good. The information bruteforce needs is being collected by syslog and placed in the table, when this table is updated pf doesn't update it's copy of it. Dave. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerard Seibert" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:40 PM Subject: Re: bruteforce not restarting pf? > On Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:02:02 PM, "Dave" > Subject: bruteforce not restarting pf? > Wrote these words of wisdom: > >> Hello, >> I've got a machine running 5.4, offering ssh services and running >> bruteforce. In my daily security log emails i am seeing entries like: >> >> Nov 7 07:06:55 zeus sshd[24747]: Failed password for illegal user miha >> from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56265 ssh2 >> Nov 7 07:06:58 zeus sshd[24749]: Failed password for illegal user miha >> from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56319 ssh2 >> Nov 7 07:07:01 zeus sshd[24751]: Failed password for root from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56376 ssh2 >> Nov 7 07:07:03 zeus sshd[24753]: Failed password for root from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56418 ssh2 >> Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Failed password for illegal user simon >> from 163.13.111.172 port 56461 ssh2 >> Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Failed password for illegal user simon >> from 163.13.111.172 port 56504 ssh2 >> Nov 7 07:07:10 zeus sshd[24761]: Failed password for root from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56543 ssh2 >> Nov 7 07:07:12 zeus sshd[24763]: Failed password for root from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56589 >> ... >> >> I know these are automated atempts at entry but i thought bruteforce was >> suppose to stop these. In my auth.log i do see the IP being added, but >> connections are still allowed. Here's the snipet: >> >> Nov 7 06:54:52 zeus sshd[24687]: fatal: Timeout before authentication >> for >> 163.13.111.172 >> Nov 7 07:06:55 zeus sshd[24747]: Illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 >> Nov 7 07:06:55 zeus sshd[24747]: Failed password for illegal user miha >> from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56265 ssh2 >> 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 1. >> Nov 7 07:06:58 zeus sshd[24749]: Illegal user miha from 163.13.111.172 >> Nov 7 07:06:58 zeus sshd[24749]: Failed password for illegal user miha >> from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56319 ssh2 >> 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 2. >> Nov 7 07:07:01 zeus sshd[24751]: Failed password for root from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56376 ssh2 >> 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 3. >> Nov 7 07:07:03 zeus sshd[24753]: Failed password for root from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56418 ssh2 >> IP 163.13.111.172 reached the maximum number of failed attempts!!! >> Adding IP to the firewall... >> Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 >> Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Failed password for illegal user simon >> from 163.13.111.172 port 56461 ssh2 >> Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 >> Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Failed password for illegal user simon >> from 163.13.111.172 port 56504 ssh2 >> Nov 7 07:07:10 zeus sshd[24761]: Failed password for root from >> 163.13.111.172 port 56543 ssh2 >> >> Checking my bruteforce table ;i see 163.13.111.172/32 in it, so it was >> added, but i don't get why future connections were permitted unless pf >> was >> not restarted or informed about the updated table. In my pf.conf file i >> have: >> >> table persist file "/etc/bruteforce" >> set block-policy drop >> block in log quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from to any >> port >> ssh >> >> Any help appreciated. >> Thanks. >> Dave. >> > > ***** REPLY SEPARATOR ***** > On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied: > > You might want to check out this URL: > > http://danger.rulez.sk/projects/bruteforceblocker/ > > Perhaps you might be able to glom something of value there. > > -- > Gerard Seibert > gerard@seibercom.net > > > A: Because it reverses the natural flow of a dialog. > Q: Why is top posting undesirable when replying? > > TOPIC: Posting Etiquette > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 18:27:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182C516A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:27:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard2.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F78543D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:27:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 49640 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 18:27:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 18:27:57 -0000 Message-ID: <4370EE2F.5000109@123.com.sv> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:27:59 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: HP DL380 hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:27:03 -0000 Hi, im having the same problem addressed on this thread, http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&m=112179929823932&w=2 Lowell Gilbert recomends to check the media, in my case the boot-only cd, the media is ok, i have booted with it on serveral desktops, the server's cd drive is also ok, i can boot a gentoo 2005.1 with it, what else can i check? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 18:27:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9B816A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:27:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brad@bvoth.homeunix.org) Received: from freebsd.bvoth.homeunix.org (adsl-70-224-68-119.dsl.sbndin.ameritech.net [70.224.68.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3312543D70 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:27:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brad@bvoth.homeunix.org) Received: from nb103 (69-213-182-3.ded.ameritech.net [69.213.182.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by freebsd.bvoth.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA8IVrjb031116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:32:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brad@bvoth.homeunix.org) From: "Brad Voth" To: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:28:16 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5e492$3bdb40b0$f3012c0a@memorialsb.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcXkXM0nhmdL+cLrR4yUOGMJjim2uAAM/VOA In-Reply-To: <20051108120054.48B0C16A421@hub.freebsd.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: RE: USB Hard Drive Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:27:36 -0000 If you have the chance I would suggest building a custom kernel with the 'device uhid' Line commented out to see if that makes a difference. The only real problem with this I believe will be that some devices that act as hids, keyboards and mice (others too, not sure the entire scope) may not work. >Recently, I purchased several Western Digital External Hard Drives to be >used for backup purposes. The test unit I purchased worked out of the >box, but I am having problems getting the newer ones to work. > >When they are plugged in to a FreeBSD 5.3 or 5.4 server, I receive the >following messages: > >Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: umass0: Western Digital External HDD, rev >2.00/6.02 >Nov 8 01:31:12 test kernel: uhid0: Western Digital External HDD, rev >2.00/6.02, addr2, iclass 8/6 > >This is where my confusion lies. From what I can see the hard drive is >detected properly as a umass device, but is also detected as a human input >device. And, the da device, which I think I will use to access the device >is not created. > >If I plug my memory stick into the USB port, the memory stick is detected >and I am able to access the device through da0. > >Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. > >Thanks in advance. > > > >Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 18:57:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5924E16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:57:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD0443D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:57:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDEA1CC6D; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:57:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683AA1CC8C; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:57:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:56:38 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1947363373.20051108195638@rulez.sk> To: "Dave" In-Reply-To: <004c01c5e486$23d5c550$0900a8c0@satellite> References: <004c01c5e486$23d5c550$0900a8c0@satellite> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.877 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.522, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -3.877 X-Spam-Level: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bruteforce not restarting pf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:57:07 -0000 Hello Dave, Tuesday, November 8, 2005, 6:02:02 PM, you wrote these comments: > Hello, > I've got a machine running 5.4, offering ssh services and running > bruteforce. In my daily security log emails i am seeing entries like: > I know these are automated atempts at entry but i thought bruteforce was > suppose to stop these. In my auth.log i do see the IP being added, but > connections are still allowed. Here's the snipet: > 163.13.111.172 port 56376 ssh2 > 163.13.111.172 was logged with total count of 3. > Nov 7 07:07:03 zeus sshd[24753]: Failed password for root from > 163.13.111.172 port 56418 ssh2 > IP 163.13.111.172 reached the maximum number of failed attempts!!! > Adding IP to the firewall... > Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 > Nov 7 07:07:05 zeus sshd[24757]: Failed password for illegal user simon > from 163.13.111.172 port 56461 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Illegal user simon from 163.13.111.172 > Nov 7 07:07:08 zeus sshd[24759]: Failed password for illegal user simon > from 163.13.111.172 port 56504 ssh2 > Nov 7 07:07:10 zeus sshd[24761]: Failed password for root from > 163.13.111.172 port 56543 ssh2 > Checking my bruteforce table ;i see 163.13.111.172/32 in it, so it was > added, but i don't get why future connections were permitted unless pf was > not restarted or informed about the updated table. In my pf.conf file i > have: what version of bruteforceblocker do you use? > table persist file "/etc/bruteforce" > set block-policy drop > block in log quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from to any port > ssh > Any help appreciated. > Thanks. > Dave. Btw I'm about to release new version in a near future, the code is done, but the port isn't yet :) -- Best Regards, DanGer, ICQ: 261701668 | e-mail protecting at: http://www.2pu.net/ http://danger.rulez.sk | proxy list at: http://www.proxy-web.com/ | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! [ This is starting to get interesting, don't you think? ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 19:24:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E661F16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:24:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mailgate.bytemobile.com (mailgate.bytemobile.com [209.10.233.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695CD43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:24:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:24:12 -0800 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Dan Rue Message-ID: <20051108192412.GB1816@flame.pc> References: <20051108171019.GF27437@therub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051108171019.GF27437@therub.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2005 19:24:13.0571 (UTC) FILETIME=[0093CD30:01C5E49A] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hi - I have question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:24:15 -0000 On 2005-11-08 11:10, Dan Rue wrote: > On Tue Nov 1 06:10:18 PST 2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >On 2005-10-31 18:42, Nataly Afek wrote: > >> 1) I'm working with Freebsd 5.3 and i want to know > >> when will the support of this version will be finished? > > > >5.3-RELEASE was an "early adopter" release. Sice then, a lot of > >important bugs have been fixed in the RELENG_5 branch. You should > >definitely try updating to a newer version, like 5.4-RELEASE or even > >5-STABLE, as soon as possible. > > This is bad advise. Maybe. Then again, if one has problems with 5.3-RELEASE because of the serious bugs that release has, it may be good advice :) > 5.3 was not an early adopter release - it was the first > stable/production release of the 5 branch. Which was, in my opinion, rushed out a bit just because "it was about time a release was handed out to the world". This is why there are serious bugs in that release. This is why I recommended updating to a 5.4-RELEASE or newer, if possible. > Furthermore, according to http://www.freebsd.org/security/, it > is support until at least October 31, 2006. The original > poster just has to update 5.3 to get the latest security > updates according to the handbook. I know :) This only covers security fixes and any other fixes the security team is willing to backport though. Bug fixes that are potentially useful but do not pose a security threat, may lag a bit behind. > And lastly, it is bad advise to upgrade to 5-STABLE. 5-STABLE > is the 5 development branch, and should not be run unless you > know better. Hummm. If you want to start nit-picking about the meaning of words, then it's not a very good idea to call "RELENG_5" a "development branch" either. Anyway... > General users should stick with releases. In this case, the > original poster's options are stay with 5.3 (and probably grab > the security updates), upgrade to 5.4, or to 6.0. Exactly. I agree 100% with this. This was exactly what I meant when I suggested updating to 5.4-RELEASE or 5-STABLE. It's also my personal opinion that 5-STABLE is safer for someone who's accustomed to 5.3-RELEASE. But that's more a guess than an absolute certainty right now, since I haven't run any 5.X version in production machines for a while. - Giorgos PS: Please ignore the useless footer the mail gateway adds to all my posts while I'm behind this particular network. The text is entirely useless and rather annoying when I post to open lists like this one. This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, do not forward this email to any other person, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 19:32:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A5816A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:32:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A702043D4C for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:32:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 16so632399nzp for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:32:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TMS0cu2RQ+j8CI6W6mbWHfRKCD+sVvLqZkh8TRlt/1zvIf6/pREO0KA1yb80qdF3LhSG5GlGatP2DnYrQk1oVfpc/zB1XNzOlg5IFbFeiKCGDQueZiKcMlRzcFvej3W/9VjsCKmhsqCZ3uwvcjOHr4mNLkXs7TAugaJicOl7r6Y= Received: by 10.64.209.3 with SMTP id h3mr6997364qbg; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.253.2 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:32:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990511081132g4f51da70i22f74af268b4594@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:32:19 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: jhall@vandaliamo.net In-Reply-To: <1221.199.223.158.225.1131462830.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1758.12.170.206.13.1131435691.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <4370A70F.8010305@wmptl.com> <1221.199.223.158.225.1131462830.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Hard Drive Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:32:20 -0000 On 11/8/05, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: > The actual enclosure is made by Western Digital. > > If I run usbdevs I receive the following output. > > addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel > addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel > addr 1: EHCI root hub, Intel > addr 2: External HDD, Western Digital > > I'm guessing the device would be /dev/da0s1. > Most likely. The EHCI device claims to be buggy in 5.3 and 5.4. You might try disabling it to see if the drive is correctly classified when it is handled by the UHCI device. Actually, I don't even know if those are the drivers that do the device classification, but in the absence of that information, it seems worth a try. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 19:34:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4C316A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:34:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: from mail.outstep.com (www.outstep.com [205.177.73.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED6143D8A for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:33:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: (qmail 22723 invoked by uid 509); 8 Nov 2005 11:34:57 -0800 Received: from 70.120.87.170 by GeneralC.outstep.com (envelope-from , uid 507) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.83/1166. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(70.120.87.170):SA:0(-2.3/1.0):. Processed in 0.555513 secs); 08 Nov 2005 19:34:57 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=1.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: lonnie@outstep.com via GeneralC.outstep.com X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(70.120.87.170):SA:0(-2.3/1.0):. Processed in 0.555513 secs Process 22714) Received: from cpe-70-120-87-170.satx.res.rr.com (HELO ?192.168.0.114?) (lonnie@outstep.com@70.120.87.170) by mail.outstep.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 11:34:56 -0800 Message-ID: <4370FD8D.5020101@outstep.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 13:33:33 -0600 From: Lonnie Cumberland User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: upgrade package questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:34:04 -0000 Hello All, Could someone please tell me how to upgrade a package over the web? What I mean is that i have used /stand/sysinstall >>configure >> Pachages which allowed me to choose ftp://ftp1.freebsd.org to install a package from but now I need to manually upgrade a package "Gettext 0.13.?" I think that it was over to "Gettext 0.14.?" What would be the command like way to do this? Thanks, Lonnie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 19:48:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889F816A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:48:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C09043D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:48:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301521A3C1A; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:48:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66117514A3; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:48:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:48:37 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tsu-Fan Cheng Message-ID: <20051108194837.GB41064@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 to 6.0 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:48:38 -0000 --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: > Hi fbsder, > I just upgraded my 5.4 to 6.0 last night and encounter some problems, please > forgive me if this has already been brought up... > I cvsup the source by changing RELENG_5 to RELENG_6, do the cvsup and follow > the old routine (make buildowlrd.... mergemaster..), after reboot, I noticed > that > (1) my system is still called FREEBSD 5.4, This tells you right here that you didn't, in fact, upgrade to RELENG_6. Check that your source was completely updated, and that you precisely followed the upgrade instructions in UPDATING or the handbook. At a guess, you omitted the step when you build and install the new kernel. Kris --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDcQEVWry0BWjoQKURAonAAJ9jsg968txFyLwQM1RyYhQgeyno3QCeJ2S0 HSGIhJzhxfof5j1IXjmqRqQ= =t0q1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 19:58:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BE916A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:58:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephanweaver@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay20-f30.bay20.hotmail.com [64.4.54.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3941943D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:58:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephanweaver@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:58:58 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 209.94.222.190 by by20fd.bay20.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:58:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [209.94.222.190] X-Originating-Email: [stephanweaver@hotmail.com] X-Sender: stephanweaver@hotmail.com From: "Stephan Weaver" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:58:58 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2005 19:58:58.0744 (UTC) FILETIME=[DB6FF380:01C5E49E] Cc: Subject: Imp Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:58:59 -0000 I have installed imp from the ports. when i try to log on to the imp webpage, [http://192.168.0.199/imp] i just get this page cannot be displayed. What can i do to further troubleshoot this problem? ps. Please email me at stephanweaver@hotmail.com as i am not on the mailing list. Thank you guys Stephan Weaver _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 20:06:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D73716A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:06:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1699B43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:06:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.140] (tui75-2-82-229-178-102.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.178.102]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4879697; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:06:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:06:53 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <565961618.20051108210653@free.fr> To: "Stephan Weaver" In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Imp Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:06:53 -0000 Hello Stephan, can you be more precise ? it a 404 ? what does say /var/log/httpd-error.log ? have you registred php in you apache conf ? (AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3 .php4 .php5) cheers, Mathieu CHATEAU Tuesday, November 8, 2005, 8:58:58 PM, you wrote: SW> I have installed imp from the ports. SW> when i try to log on to the imp webpage, SW> [http://192.168.0.199/imp] i just SW> get this page cannot be displayed. SW> What can i do to further troubleshoot this problem? SW> ps. Please email me at stephanweaver@hotmail.com as i am not on the mailing SW> list. SW> Thank you guys SW> Stephan Weaver SW> _________________________________________________________________ SW> Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! SW> http://search.msn.com/ SW> _______________________________________________ SW> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list SW> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions SW> To unsubscribe, send any mail to SW> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Best regards, Mathieu mailto:gollum123@free.fr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 20:11:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA45416A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:11:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1032843D4C for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 4553 invoked by uid 1006); 8 Nov 2005 20:11:24 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:SA:0(-0.8/100.0):. Processed in 2.995097 secs); 08 Nov 2005 20:11:24 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (10.75.0.7) by -v with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 20:11:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 8353 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 20:11:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 20:11:21 -0000 Received: from 199.223.158.225 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:11:21 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1204.199.223.158.225.1131480681.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> In-Reply-To: <54db43990511081132g4f51da70i22f74af268b4594@mail.gmail.com> References: <1758.12.170.206.13.1131435691.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <4370A70F.8010305@wmptl.com> <1221.199.223.158.225.1131462830.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> <54db43990511081132g4f51da70i22f74af268b4594@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:11:21 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: "Bob Johnson" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jhall@vandaliamo.net, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Hard Drive Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:11:28 -0000 > On 11/8/05, jhall@vandaliamo.net wrote: >> The actual enclosure is made by Western Digital. >> >> If I run usbdevs I receive the following output. >> >> addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel >> addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel >> addr 1: EHCI root hub, Intel >> addr 2: External HDD, Western Digital >> >> I'm guessing the device would be /dev/da0s1. >> > > Most likely. > > The EHCI device claims to be buggy in 5.3 and 5.4. You might try > disabling it to see if the drive is correctly classified when it is > handled by the UHCI device. Actually, I don't even know if those are > the drivers that do the device classification, but in the absence of > that information, it seems worth a try. > > - Bob > Removing the EHCI device does not have any affect. Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 20:21:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FAE16A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:21:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FEA43D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:21:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so630874nzo for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:21:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qc0vV5eJ0vHxO9iUpH+5nRg+6omnx/VpbRtQ3jO4jJSamU/pwLod1P9NNFZuops3bmyA/zojDhlcNdnS/6D8KiOMk1Z7dPMDyy7EH733Ztbx5MNFntGVAAtrhStpLUn7hwF2S27ZOH8HZDE+BHGky1Wk8F81S9GMnQ+QtNWjM9I= Received: by 10.36.5.4 with SMTP id 4mr1264223nze; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:21:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:21:25 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: fanijak In-Reply-To: <4370D40F.4070506@email.t-com.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4370D40F.4070506@email.t-com.hr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAM question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:21:31 -0000 On 11/8/05, fanijak wrote: > Haw meani memory RAM is consumed by boing ? I heave aproxsimaly 512RAM. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > > It depends on the project you choose. Boinc itself consumes almost nothing, but a project can demand 128Mb of RAM or more. For example: http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/tech_faq_boinc.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 20:25:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922BA16A430 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sunil_tv@yahoo.com) Received: from web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78CDF43D82 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:24:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sunil_tv@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 16721 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Nov 2005 20:24:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zpHQG53+wG6R2JZTFf9E2VdEfBfVfhJsrB7YFFF9ojseTLx+LwQjFQ8Z58W64OVMJX0/B32Aj/ooEJ9Zg2Gc8wwdggD72jf5s2PQtN0z26LFwvkJVmcjCOmpWPN+17w1e1Tz/rOrEc4FhIewell/YEjxOFZlrXFKjFs0ACFjMGo= ; Message-ID: <20051108202456.16719.qmail@web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [192.91.75.30] by web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:24:56 PST Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:24:56 -0800 (PST) From: Sunil Kumar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051108174324.38F1016A42A@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Intel 2200bg wireless lan support in FreeBSD6.0 stable release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:25:22 -0000 Hi, I am a trying to get wirless lan working on my Toshiba laptop(M55-S325). It has Intel 2200bg Centrino. I am getting in to problems. I am using the FreeBSD6.0 stable release. I have following questions. 1. Is there a document/help site where the steps are documented? 2. If I execute "kldload -v if_iwi" then in the dmesg output, i get a message saying "download firmware". What firmware should i have to download? I cannot use ports collection(pkg_add or make install clean) because that laptop does not have ethernet connection(I think there is no support for the Marvell Yukon 88E80836 chipset). 3.If is execute this command " iwicontrol -i iwi0 -d /usr/local/libdata/if_iwi -m bss" i get a error message that this iwicontrol is not a command and i searched whole FreeBSD and i could not get this file. how will i get this command? 4.Then is just did "ifconfig iwi0 up" and then run ifconfig command, i get the output similar to the below ifconfig iwi0 iwi0: flags=8806 mtu 1500 ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) status: no carrier ssid "" channel -1 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 rtsthreshold 2312 protmode CTS txpower 100 wepmode OFF weptxkey 0 Can any one helpme? With Regards and Thanks Sunil --------------------------------- Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 20:25:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20D516A434 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919CF43D96 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:25:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x3so649375nzd for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:25:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pSVS7DIdvxJpnphHFKXvoetTGKv4VgZ9UZLH9GdlQOCmgFe4Xc2o+1e20OB+txp0srLrzXiHskpU6kSJP4F6qNF3vlNVVpRhgEbhd+/cziUGNN7aIEKAjMBSRLcFPxxBqLlXX9JJceZslN3evdaObIlQMJIwb0xXiJbuOFHYf8s= Received: by 10.36.141.13 with SMTP id o13mr2344018nzd; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:25:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:25:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:25:12 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Lonnie Cumberland In-Reply-To: <4370FD8D.5020101@outstep.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4370FD8D.5020101@outstep.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade package questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:25:22 -0000 On 11/8/05, Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > Hello All, > > Could someone please tell me how to upgrade a package over the web? > > What I mean is that i have used /stand/sysinstall >>configure >> > Pachages which allowed me to choose ftp://ftp1.freebsd.org to install a > package from but now I need to manually upgrade a package "Gettext > 0.13.?" I think that it was over to "Gettext 0.14.?" > > What would be the command like way to do this? > > Thanks, > Lonnie > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > The straight way would be: pkg_delete mypackage && pkg_add -r mypackage Still I would prefer installing portupgrade and doing: portupgrade -PP mypackage From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 20:35:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF9416A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:35:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D8843D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:35:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA8KYvws021523; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:34:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 43B57B822; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:15:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:15:39 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Lonnie Cumberland Message-ID: <20051108201539.GA20561@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Lonnie Cumberland , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4370FD8D.5020101@outstep.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4370FD8D.5020101@outstep.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade package questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:35:06 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:33:33PM -0600, Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > Hello All, >=20 > Could someone please tell me how to upgrade a package over the web? The -r option of pkg_add allows you to get remote packages. So you could first forcibly deinstall the old package with 'pkg_delete -f', and than get the new one with 'pkg_add -r'. And then you should fix the package database dependancies with 'pkgdb -F', I think. Personally, I find it easier to use the portupgrade program, because not everything is available as a package, and it takes care of the messy detail. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDcQdrEnfvsMMhpyURAoTwAJwJU/imXO9DjnU9tkWumDjlY3a86wCcCf2C t/BfrjQc3s7KE6VDDibRjbY= =6Ui5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 20:49:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC01916A43A for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efrenba@yahoo.es) Received: from web25509.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25509.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A954F43D5A for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efrenba@yahoo.es) Received: (qmail 50955 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Nov 2005 20:49:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.es; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YrC6zFLh9LAtnUgFFVISlu4p4tFKeZYhmvGE+FZndG0QJQ/KC1VCIMTqlAUGj2lcXjHKOikclvSHXB4dWA1UCzmMafPp3QiEYGTvkxc3y6rdmDrCafNZfISDiwOKmBPWIta2dWtsDlGaJLlg2Q3F/OTKrqElLDj7TYu2IIycCxs= ; Message-ID: <20051108204937.50953.qmail@web25509.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.59.144.88] by web25509.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:49:37 CET Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:49:37 +0100 (CET) From: Efren Bravo To: freeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: about rdr X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:49:41 -0000 Hi, I've not very clear if this is correct: Network layout: [Pub Lan] --if0:[OS, ipf/ipnat]:if1-- [Priv Lan] Pub Lan: 192.168.80.0/24 Priv Lan: 7.96.160.0/24 if0: 192.168.80.4/24 if1: 7.96.160.13/24 map command works well but rdr not. Q: Can I use rdr from if0 -> if1, no matter if if0 is on unroutable ip range? Thanks... Efren Bravo. ______________________________________________ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! Nuevos servicios, más seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 20:59:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9935716A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:59:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC0A43D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:59:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (nieser.net [194.109.160.131]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA8Kx5Jq040190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:59:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <4371119B.2000306@xs4all.nl> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:59:07 +0100 From: Hans Nieser User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20051108081941.GA27333@just.puresimplicity.net> <44hdanhy1w.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44hdanhy1w.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: Unusual permissions on /var/named/etc/namedb/master? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:59:07 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Josh Tolbert writes: > > >>Hello, >> >>I'm running DHCP + dynamic DNS here on my home LAN and I've noticed a problem >>that needs a manual fix every time the DNS machine gets rebooted. It doesn't >>happen very often, but it does happen. :) >> >>My firewall/gateway machine runs FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE of some patchlevel. It >>uses ISC DHCPD from ports to update my DNS server, another FreeBSD machine >>(now running 6.0-RELEASE) with new entries when machines register with the >>DHCP server. The problem arises because by default named runs -u bind, however >>/var/named/etc/namedb/master is owned by root. I believe this is caused by >>/etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist, since I'm running bind chrooted (the default >>setup). When the DNS machine reboots, I have to manually chown >>/var/named/etc/namedb/master (or /etc/namedb/master) to bind before updates >>will continue, otherwise I see errors such as >> >>named[297]: dumping master file: master/tmp-QQ2UU6pWaZ: open: permission denied >> >>Is there any good workaround for this issue? I'd like to keep bind running as >>the bind user as well as keep bind chrooted if possible. I know I could edit >>the mtree file on my machine, but that seems somewhat kludgy to me. >> >>Thanks for any help/advice you can give me, > > > Normally mtree is only automatically run by installworld. > Is that what causes the permissions to be reverted? > If so, then change the mtree file (and keep the modifications over > time when you run mergemaster). > If not, then figure out what *is* changing the permissions. This happened to me too; everytime named started it would change back the owner of the "master" directory from "bind" to "root" according to the mtree file. In the end I just used the "dynamic" folder to store my dynamic zones in with "bind" as owner, which makes more sense, and also doesn't get its user changed by the mtree. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 21:27:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7DE16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:27:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (just.puresimplicity.net [140.177.207.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539C643D48 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:27:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (localhost.puresimplicity.net [127.0.0.1]) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA8LRcnI002185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:27:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hemi@just.puresimplicity.net) Received: (from hemi@localhost) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jA8LRcxa002184; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:27:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hemi) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:27:38 -0600 From: Josh Tolbert To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20051108212738.GB1623@just.puresimplicity.net> References: <20051108081941.GA27333@just.puresimplicity.net> <44hdanhy1w.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44hdanhy1w.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unusual permissions on /var/named/etc/namedb/master? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:27:47 -0000 On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:03:23PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Josh Tolbert writes: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm running DHCP + dynamic DNS here on my home LAN and I've noticed a problem > > that needs a manual fix every time the DNS machine gets rebooted. It doesn't > > happen very often, but it does happen. :) > > > > My firewall/gateway machine runs FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE of some patchlevel. It > > uses ISC DHCPD from ports to update my DNS server, another FreeBSD machine > > (now running 6.0-RELEASE) with new entries when machines register with the > > DHCP server. The problem arises because by default named runs -u bind, however > > /var/named/etc/namedb/master is owned by root. I believe this is caused by > > /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist, since I'm running bind chrooted (the default > > setup). When the DNS machine reboots, I have to manually chown > > /var/named/etc/namedb/master (or /etc/namedb/master) to bind before updates > > will continue, otherwise I see errors such as > > > > named[297]: dumping master file: master/tmp-QQ2UU6pWaZ: open: permission denied > > > > Is there any good workaround for this issue? I'd like to keep bind running as > > the bind user as well as keep bind chrooted if possible. I know I could edit > > the mtree file on my machine, but that seems somewhat kludgy to me. > > > > Thanks for any help/advice you can give me, > > Normally mtree is only automatically run by installworld. > Is that what causes the permissions to be reverted? > If so, then change the mtree file (and keep the modifications over > time when you run mergemaster). > If not, then figure out what *is* changing the permissions. Hi Lowell, >From what I'm seeing in the /etc/rc.d/named script, mtree gets ran with the BIND.chroot.dist mtree file every time bind starts. I guess I'll have to maintain my own changes to that file for the time being. Thanks, Josh -- Josh Tolbert hemi@puresimplicity.net || http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/ If your sysadmin's not being fascist, you're paying him too much. --Sam Greenfield From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 21:34:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04CC16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:34:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C898C43D68 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:34:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 8AC9931334; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:34:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:34:04 -0500 (EST) From: user To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: how do I tell FreeBSD to sync, for real ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:34:09 -0000 Sometimes you delete a large batch of files, or you do some other serious FS operations and the output of `df` does not tell you immediately of the new disk space, etc. If you run something like: sync Or even: sync ; sync it still doesn't show up. You either have to wait for a while, or you have to get silly with something like: sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync (or unmount and remount the FS) ----- So my question is, well first off, why does this happen this way ? But mostly what I want to know is, is there a more graceful way to tell FreeBSD "sync for real this time, not just for joke only ?" Basically, is there a nicer way to get what I want than: sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync thx. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 21:56:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175CC16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:56:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7908143D48 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:56:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 11691 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 21:56:54 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Nov 2005 21:56:53 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CBAAA28441; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:56:52 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Josh Tolbert References: <20051108081941.GA27333@just.puresimplicity.net> <44hdanhy1w.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20051108212738.GB1623@just.puresimplicity.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Nov 2005 16:56:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051108212738.GB1623@just.puresimplicity.net> Message-ID: <44acgedcrf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 47 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unusual permissions on /var/named/etc/namedb/master? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:56:56 -0000 Josh Tolbert writes: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:03:23PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Josh Tolbert writes: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm running DHCP + dynamic DNS here on my home LAN and I've noticed a problem > > > that needs a manual fix every time the DNS machine gets rebooted. It doesn't > > > happen very often, but it does happen. :) > > > > > > My firewall/gateway machine runs FreeBSD-5.4-RELEASE of some patchlevel. It > > > uses ISC DHCPD from ports to update my DNS server, another FreeBSD machine > > > (now running 6.0-RELEASE) with new entries when machines register with the > > > DHCP server. The problem arises because by default named runs -u bind, however > > > /var/named/etc/namedb/master is owned by root. I believe this is caused by > > > /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist, since I'm running bind chrooted (the default > > > setup). When the DNS machine reboots, I have to manually chown > > > /var/named/etc/namedb/master (or /etc/namedb/master) to bind before updates > > > will continue, otherwise I see errors such as > > > > > > named[297]: dumping master file: master/tmp-QQ2UU6pWaZ: open: permission denied > > > > > > Is there any good workaround for this issue? I'd like to keep bind running as > > > the bind user as well as keep bind chrooted if possible. I know I could edit > > > the mtree file on my machine, but that seems somewhat kludgy to me. > > > > > > Thanks for any help/advice you can give me, > > > > Normally mtree is only automatically run by installworld. > > Is that what causes the permissions to be reverted? > > If so, then change the mtree file (and keep the modifications over > > time when you run mergemaster). > > If not, then figure out what *is* changing the permissions. > > Hi Lowell, > > >From what I'm seeing in the /etc/rc.d/named script, mtree gets ran with the > BIND.chroot.dist mtree file every time bind starts. I guess I'll have to > maintain my own changes to that file for the time being. Ah, so it does. I hadn't noticed because I make a separate subdirectory for each of my zones, and the mtree file doesn't touch those. Which I suppose could be a solution for you too, although with mergemaster in the base system, I don't think keeping your own modifications to /etc files is that big a deal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 22:03:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1777B16A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:03:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E8143D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:03:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20515 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 22:03:08 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Nov 2005 22:03:08 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 76F9D28441; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:03:06 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: user To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Nov 2005 17:03:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4464r2dch1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: how do I tell FreeBSD to sync, for real ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:03:09 -0000 user writes: > Sometimes you delete a large batch of files, or you do some other serious > FS operations and the output of `df` does not tell you immediately of the > new disk space, etc. > > If you run something like: sync > > Or even: sync ; sync > > it still doesn't show up. You either have to wait for a while, or you > have to get silly with something like: > > sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync > > (or unmount and remount the FS) > > ----- > > So my question is, well first off, why does this happen this way ? But > mostly what I want to know is, is there a more graceful way to tell > FreeBSD "sync for real this time, not just for joke only ?" > > Basically, is there a nicer way to get what I want than: > > sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync "sleep 30"? http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix99/full_papers/mckusick/mckusick.pdf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 22:08:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9F716A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:08:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B766943D48 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:08:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 242BD3136B; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:08:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:08:44 -0500 (EST) From: user To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4464r2dch1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: how do I tell FreeBSD to sync, for real ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:08:46 -0000 On 8 Nov 2005, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > So my question is, well first off, why does this happen this way ? But > > mostly what I want to know is, is there a more graceful way to tell > > FreeBSD "sync for real this time, not just for joke only ?" > > > > Basically, is there a nicer way to get what I want than: > > > > sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync > > "sleep 30"? > > http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix99/full_papers/mckusick/mckusick.pdf No, I'm not asking "why do I need to sync" ... I understand why I need to wait, or issue a sync command. No problems there. What I am asking is, why is one issuance of `sync` not enough ? Why is two not enough ? Why do I need to issue 6 or 8 of them ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 22:13:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1566716A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:13:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.burakowski@mrburak.net) Received: from mail.mrburak.net (203-217-17-178.perm.iinet.net.au [203.217.17.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B3143D5D for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:13:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard.burakowski@mrburak.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [10.20.0.1]) by mail.mrburak.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC5122820; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:13:47 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4371231A.9000704@mrburak.net> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:13:46 +1100 From: Richard Burakowski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeffrey Ellis References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: How to sort find results X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:13:53 -0000 Jeffrey Ellis wrote: >Hi, Richard -- > >Do you mean in David's script (I have heard of that happening before with >copy and paste)? > >How can I tell if that's the case? And how would I go about fixing it? > > that's right, in the script that's trying to run. usually with the default vi, you should see ^M at the end of every line. from vi :%s/^M$//g where ^M is CTRL-V-M, amomg others From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 22:38:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570DE16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:38:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dm@mainframe.ca) Received: from wale.mainframe.ca (wale.mainframe.ca [209.17.131.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F357B43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:38:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dm@mainframe.ca) Received: from jupiter.mainframe.ca ([10.0.0.12] helo=mail.mainframe.ca) by wale.mainframe.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EZc6l-000CNu-GN for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:38:27 -0800 Received: from [172.16.139.102] (helo=Mandarin-04) by mail.mainframe.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EZc26-00019f-MP for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:33:38 -0800 From: Derrick MacPherson To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <437028F8.3020303@mainframe.ca> References: <437028F8.3020303@mainframe.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:38:21 -0800 Message-Id: <1131489502.8762.19.camel@mandarin-04> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-22) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: setting a quotas default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:38:28 -0000 On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 20:26 -0800, Derrick MacPherson wrote: > i have proftpd getting users out of a mysql DB, and it's set to create > home dirs automaticaly; how do i get there to be a quota automaticaly be > placed on the users? can this not be done? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 22:47:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2953816A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:47:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4268E43D5A for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:47:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id jA8MlCtT077896; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:47:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:47:12 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Derrick MacPherson Message-ID: <20051108224712.GC87007@dan.emsphone.com> References: <437028F8.3020303@mainframe.ca> <1131489502.8762.19.camel@mandarin-04> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1131489502.8762.19.camel@mandarin-04> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting a quotas default X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:47:18 -0000 In the last episode (Nov 08), Derrick MacPherson said: > On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 20:26 -0800, Derrick MacPherson wrote: > > i have proftpd getting users out of a mysql DB, and it's set to > > create home dirs automaticaly; how do i get there to be a quota > > automaticaly be placed on the users? > > can this not be done? What I do is just "prefill" the quotas for as many users as you expect to have, using the edquota command. Assuming your uids start at 1000 and you already have user 1000's quotas set: edquota -p 1000 1001-2000 will copy userid 1000's quotas to the next 1000 users to get created. If proftpd can run a script when it creates a user, you could set the quota in there. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 22:50:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCFB16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.77.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D06143D4C for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:50:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005110822500501300anjnue>; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:50:11 +0000 Message-ID: <4370D736.7030502@computer.org> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:49:58 +0000 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:50:21 -0000 Hello, I'm having difficulties getting acroread7 to work within firefox-1.0.7. I've google'd and read some on the list archives... and am still not up and running. I get no errors, it IS listed in 'about:plugins', and acroread7 works from command line. I just get nothing. Anytime i follow a link to a *.pdf... firefox just immediately says 'Done' in the status bar. If I wait forever... still nothing. All other plugins (mplayer, QT, flash, etc) work fine. Here's what I've done to get here: - Fresh install of 6.0-RELEASE from ISO - CVSup ports and sources (this morning) - build world/kernel - installed linux_base-8 via ports - installed firefox via ports - installed linuxpluginwrapper via ports I copied libmap.conf-FreeBSD6 to /etc/libmap.conf. Cut some stuff out. Left in the acroread sections (among others): # Acrobat7 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror #[/usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so] [/usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so] libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/acrobat.so Note that I changed the [pointer?] to where the shared object actually resides. I also created a symlink from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so -> /usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so Any help is appreciated. I've seen a few posts (some quite old) of others having problems with acroread7 and firefox... but nothing has solved my problem. Thanks. -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 23:07:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6BF16A420 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:07:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C727243D5C for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:07:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id D50F43132F; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:07:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:07:14 -0500 (EST) From: user To: David Kirchner In-Reply-To: <35c231bf0511081458w24119f79g3e32786cb997d4cc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I tell FreeBSD to sync, for real ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:07:16 -0000 On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, David Kirchner wrote: > On 11/8/05, user wrote: > > No, I'm not asking "why do I need to sync" ... I understand why I need to > > wait, or issue a sync command. No problems there. > > > > What I am asking is, why is one issuance of `sync` not enough ? Why is > > two not enough ? Why do I need to issue 6 or 8 of them ? > > Softupdates is why. If you disable softupdates (tunefs -n disable > /dev/whatever) you shouldn't have to worry about the sync delay any > more. > > I do wish there was a way to force it to sync to disk on demand, though. Yes, that is what I am looking for. Well, a way besides: sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; sync ; echo "boy am I a jackass" or: mount -ur /mnt/fs ; mount -uw /mnt/fs ; echo "what a loser I am" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 23:17:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865B516A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:17:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: from mail.outstep.com (www.outstep.com [205.177.73.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EC943D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:17:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: (qmail 1183 invoked by uid 509); 8 Nov 2005 15:18:17 -0800 Received: from 70.120.87.170 by GeneralC.outstep.com (envelope-from , uid 507) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.83/1166. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(70.120.87.170):SA:0(-2.3/1.0):. Processed in 0.585316 secs); 08 Nov 2005 23:18:17 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=1.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: lonnie@outstep.com via GeneralC.outstep.com X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(70.120.87.170):SA:0(-2.3/1.0):. Processed in 0.585316 secs Process 1174) Received: from cpe-70-120-87-170.satx.res.rr.com (HELO ?192.168.0.114?) (lonnie@outstep.com@70.120.87.170) by mail.outstep.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 15:18:16 -0800 Message-ID: <437131E2.2060001@outstep.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:16:50 -0600 From: Lonnie Cumberland User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ports Samba and Samba3 difference X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:17:12 -0000 Greetings All, Thanks for all of your help with the Gettext package update as it seem to be updated now. Can someone please tell me the difference between the Samba and Samba3 directories in the ports directory? I want to install a Samba server along with the latest OpenVPN server which I had running on my old Linux box. I am interested to see how efficient FreeBSD is relative to the Fedora 3 Linux distro that I had installed as well while using these packages. Cheers, Lonnie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 23:23:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A683F16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:23:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F345143D45 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:23:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA8NMre8028064 ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:22:53 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 168 Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (galois1.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.116]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA8NMqQP015252 ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:22:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by galois1.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA8NMqge009119 ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:22:52 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by galois1.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id jA8NMprU009118; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:22:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:22:51 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Miguel Message-ID: <20051108232251.GK16216@math.jussieu.fr> References: <4370EE2F.5000109@123.com.sv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4370EE2F.5000109@123.com.sv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.168]); Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:22:55 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 4371334D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: HP DL380 hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:23:08 -0000 Le 08/11/2005 à 12:27:59-0600, Miguel a écrit > Hi, im having the same problem addressed on this thread, > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&m=112179929823932&w=2 > > Lowell Gilbert recomends to check the media, in my case the boot-only > cd, the media is ok, i have booted with it on serveral desktops, the > server's cd drive is also ok, i can boot a gentoo 2005.1 with it, what > else can i check? I've DL 360 and I've use 5.4 without any problem. Have you try to disable HyperThreading in HP-Bios ? You can try to change the OS identification in HP-Bios too. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Wed Nov 9 00:21:34 CET 2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 23:28:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B569C16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:28:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard1.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A3543D49 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:28:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 89712 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2005 23:29:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 23:29:02 -0000 Message-ID: <437134C2.1060003@123.com.sv> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:29:06 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: shih@math.jussieu.fr References: <4370EE2F.5000109@123.com.sv> <20051108232251.GK16216@math.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20051108232251.GK16216@math.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: HP DL380 hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:28:08 -0000 Albert Shih wrote: > > >I've DL 360 and I've use 5.4 without any problem. > >Have you try to disable HyperThreading in HP-Bios ? You can try to change >the OS identification in HP-Bios too. > > > Im trying to install 6.0R, and i already disabled HyperThreading This used to be a linux gentoo machine, so the OS identification is Linux, should i change it? Regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 23:37:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A259116A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmarshall@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3308C43D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmarshall@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t10so59194wxc for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:37:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DNCdOQsCJVe90QndOFn11qAcH2zSZZJWukfFCjbbQDJJlQKniM7v9MOqw0xrOUMSTaDUqIxf6PM1qCx6DWGsBog7H//OiyoeKbEUiYdYkFWlYVCOyFt9ozqwu10av910Uh3zIBr4Zmu3v40xMiNU3ueto+DXExf8Dr3n92ZBgE4= Received: by 10.65.116.20 with SMTP id t20mr83664qbm; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.98.1 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:37:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <53f158630511081537p44067acch4ed37fbf65ed6eda@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:37:34 -0800 From: David Marshall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051009184730.0607fa40@cobalt.antimatter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <53f158630510091816j2b996040g53165046b9bf3fd@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20051009184730.0607fa40@cobalt.antimatter.net> Subject: Re: Best Way to Mount a File-Backed Memory Disk at Boot-Time? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:37:35 -0000 FYI, it is a "convenient" property of mount_mfs that it will do a newfs on your file-backed memory store upon mounting it. I understand that a new parameter has been added in -CURRENT recently to have it preserve the contents of the file-backed memory disk. Caveat mounter! On 10/9/05, Glenn Dawson wrote: > At 06:16 PM 10/9/2005, David Marshall wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I've got a system with a file-backed memory disk that needs to be run > >through mdconfig and then mounted at boot-time? What's the best way > >to do this? > > > >Is putting a script into /usr/local/etc/rc.d the best? > > make an entry in fstab that looks something like: > > md /mount/point mfs rw,-F/path/to/backing/store 0 0 > > -Glenn > > > >TIA! > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 00:00:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275AD16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:00:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76BD43D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:00:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so37402wxc for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:00:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HjvHeRivlEiJQlSlmK5HzqW75xLsP+P/26oaz4leYLThS3ejAC9NEY1hJrsQyNyspBqjqU6caxMvnP/35kbkfxj4EkgYw0PAKN+I++Tydo1LGJR/lB1YwD4U6LGjNrPa61J4H/dY3Xc6vZLl03r7pUyfXxIQaMGTlpIPkMQfW70= Received: by 10.70.128.12 with SMTP id a12mr35681wxd; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:58:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.104.18 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:58:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <35c231bf0511081458w24119f79g3e32786cb997d4cc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:58:12 -0800 From: David Kirchner Sender: dpkirchner@gmail.com To: user In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4464r2dch1.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I tell FreeBSD to sync, for real ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:00:45 -0000 On 11/8/05, user wrote: > No, I'm not asking "why do I need to sync" ... I understand why I need to > wait, or issue a sync command. No problems there. > > What I am asking is, why is one issuance of `sync` not enough ? Why is > two not enough ? Why do I need to issue 6 or 8 of them ? Softupdates is why. If you disable softupdates (tunefs -n disable /dev/whatever) you shouldn't have to worry about the sync delay any more. I do wish there was a way to force it to sync to disk on demand, though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 00:23:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D2D16A42C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:23:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from signal.itea.ntnu.no (signal.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.190.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDF243D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:23:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by signal.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD36A33834 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:23:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by signal.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:23:56 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 48012 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Nov 2005 01:23:55 +0100 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 01:23:55 +0100 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:23:55 +0100 (CET) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@maren.thelosingend.net To: Ihsan Dogan In-Reply-To: <20051107132418.GA18485@dogan.ch> Message-ID: <20051109011958.N47613@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <48d803190511042350w3315444er34872cfcd1a6467e@mail.gmail.com> <20051105121723.152042d2@localhost> <48d803190511051652i36e5ab4dmedac4ba61f017c9@mail.gmail.com> <20051106133412.A36825@maren.thelosingend.net> <20051106152232.S44500@maren.thelosingend.net> <20051107132418.GA18485@dogan.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suspend works, but resume doesn't on Dell desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:23:59 -0000 * Svein Halvor Halvorsen [2005-11-06 13:42 +0100] > > > When closing the lid on my laptop, while in X, and opening it again, the > > > ~50 topmost pixels are garbled and the entire view is shifted down. > > > Switching to console and back seem to fix it. Any takes? > > > > I fixed this by calling /etc/rc.lid trough devd and then calling > > vidcontrol in /etc/rc.lid. * Ihsan Dogan [2005-11-07 14:24 +0100] > Can you please provide me those entries? in /etc/devd.conf: notify 10 { match "system" "ACPI"; match "subsystem" "Lid"; action "/etc/rc.lid $notify"; }; And /etc/rc.lid: #!/bin/sh sync && sync && sync if [ $1 = 0x00 ]; then logger -t Lid Close at `date +'%Y%m%d %H:%M:%S'` vidcontrol -s1 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CF216A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:24:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884AB43D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:24:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from tripel (tripel [192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA91856; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:24:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:24:46 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Eric Schuele In-Reply-To: <4370D736.7030502@computer.org> Message-ID: <20051108191142.R73778@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <4370D736.7030502@computer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:24:56 -0000 On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Eric Schuele wrote: > I'm having difficulties getting acroread7 to work within > firefox-1.0.7. [...] > I copied libmap.conf-FreeBSD6 to /etc/libmap.conf. Cut some stuff > out. Left in the acroread sections (among others): > > # Acrobat7 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror > #[/usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so] > [/usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so] > libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/acrobat.so > > Note that I changed the [pointer?] to where the shared object actually > resides. I noticed. Why? I left mine at the default (the line you commented out above) and mine works. That is, if I click on a hyperlink to a PDF, the PDF opens in a browser window. > I also created a symlink from > /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so -> > /usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so My link in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins looks like nppdf.so -> /compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so Is there another nppdf.so on your system? Maybe you had previously installed a FreeBSD-native Mozilla-family browser? I think that if you're using linuxpluginwrapper you need to point the link to the linux nppdf.so. Just a thought. I'm on 5.4-RELEASE-p8, not 6.0 like you, so that may account for the different path. Or not. But you may want to take a look in that /compat/linux... directory and see what's there. HTH... -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 00:25:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA3216A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:25:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4E843D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:25:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA90PIhw025778; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:25:19 -0800 From: Frank Jahnke To: e.schuele@computer.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FMJ & Associates Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:21:13 -0800 Message-Id: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@fmjassoc.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jahnke@fmjassoc.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:25:42 -0000 We talked about this extensively on the ports list about a month ago, when I saw the same thing with Epiphany on 6.0-RC1. The conclusion was that this is a bug in linuxpluginwrapper. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87404 To my knowledge, this has not yet been fixed. Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 00:38:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F8E16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:38:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: from mail.outstep.com (www.outstep.com [205.177.73.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9449B43D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:38:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: (qmail 5185 invoked by uid 509); 8 Nov 2005 16:39:32 -0800 Received: from 70.120.87.170 by GeneralC.outstep.com (envelope-from , uid 507) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.83/1166. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(70.120.87.170):SA:0(-2.3/1.0):. Processed in 0.55382 secs); 09 Nov 2005 00:39:32 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=1.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: lonnie@outstep.com via GeneralC.outstep.com X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(70.120.87.170):SA:0(-2.3/1.0):. Processed in 0.55382 secs Process 5176) Received: from cpe-70-120-87-170.satx.res.rr.com (HELO ?192.168.0.114?) (lonnie@outstep.com@70.120.87.170) by mail.outstep.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2005 16:39:31 -0800 Message-ID: <437144EC.9060604@outstep.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:38:04 -0600 From: Lonnie Cumberland User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Any Default Firewall Installed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:38:27 -0000 Greetings All, I have a fresh FreeBSD 4.11 server installed with multiple IP's and am wondering if there is some type of default firewall running? The problem is that after logging in, can not telnet to either localhost or to one of the IP's, but can telnet to the other IP that is assigned to the server. For this particular project and as needed by some particular software that I have installed, I need to be able to telnet to all of the IP's and also have SSH installed. I can only telnet to 1 of the 2 IP's. How can I fix this? Thanks, Lonnie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 00:55:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E856A16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:55:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from S3.cableone.net (s3.cableone.net [24.116.0.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B12343D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:55:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (unverified [24.119.122.41]) by S3.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S3) with ESMTP id 36552665 for multiple; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:07:26 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:01:26 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: Roland Smith Message-ID: <20051108190126.424fc6d6@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <20051025135801.GA66887@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <20051025135801.GA66887@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.15 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 174, in=306, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.122.41 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: Jayesh Jayan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installation problem with Freebsd 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:55:45 -0000 On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:58:01 +0200 Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 07:09:05PM +0530, Jayesh Jayan wrote: > > an update to the issue. > > > > the error what i get is > > > > panic : page fault > > Cannnot Dump. No dump device defined. > > Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to > > abort > > Without knowing which program produces the fault, it's hard to > diagnose the problem. > > One thing you could try is to burn a 6.0-RC1 CD and try that. Test > your memory with memtest86 (http://www.memtest86.com/). Memtest86 does not tell you if you have bad ram. It just indicates that something some where is wrong with that system there. I've seen it hit errors with bad motherboards as well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 01:00:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A19516A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:00:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from S4.cableone.net (s4.cableone.net [24.116.0.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F022943D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:00:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (unverified [24.119.122.41]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 36311670 for multiple; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:17:14 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:05:57 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: Jayesh Jayan Message-ID: <20051108190557.1fc3a03a@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: References: <20051025135801.GA66887@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.15 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 173, in=306, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.122.41 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installation problem with Freebsd 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 01:00:21 -0000 On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:17:02 +0530 Jayesh Jayan wrote: > Hi, > > If i install FreeBSD on to a HDD with a good machine where i have > already installed freebsd before and then move the HDD to that > machine. > > Will it work ?? Provided that it has everything it needs in the kernel or set to load at boot time, it will work. You will also need to edit /etc/fstab if you are moving the location of the disk as well. > This is what happens when I try to install freebsd on the machine > > I can go till the step of Choosing distribution > > After I choose the distribution it starts the installation > > it shows transffering ...... in a blue screen with a progress bar. > > it then transfers 32 of 33 chunks > > and then it comes up with the error mentioned before. Well if it errors out during that, I would be sure to try a different cable and test the drive in another box using smartmontools. I would also make sure I could successfully run a livecd to make sure it is not the cd drve. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 01:37:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEF816A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from S1.cableone.net (s1.cableone.net [24.116.0.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6AB43D4C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (unverified [24.119.122.41]) by S1.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S1) with ESMTP id 36652772 for multiple; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:37:57 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:43:18 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: Stijn Hoop Message-ID: <20051108194318.1ce71700@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <20051031182539.GA52720@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20051031182539.GA52720@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.15 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamDetect: ******************************: 152.000000 Content: cid=0(152.0) =152.0 X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 174, in=291, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.122.41 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot get IP working between associated ath0 & AP, what to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 01:37:37 -0000 On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:25:39 +0100 Stijn Hoop wrote: > Hi, > > I have an SMC PCMCIA wireless adapter, model SMCWCB-G, based on an > Atheros 5212 chipset, in a laptop running a fresh install of FreeBSD > 6.0-RC1. > > The card associates fine, but then fails to send any IP packets in > the air, or at least that's what I presume is going on. I cannot > ping the AP, I cannot get a lease using DHCP, basically the only > thing I can do is associate. I think it does associate because when > I set an invalid wep key, the status changes back to 'no carrier'. > Setting a static IP address does not help. > > Any hints on where I might go from here to debug this? I know the > setup should work because in a previous life [1] it Worked With > Windows[TM] (and on the same AP). If it is using wep, set the weptxkey. I had the same problem when moving from a laptop with releng_5 to a laptop with releng_6. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 01:51:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9571516A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:51:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web61012.mail.yahoo.com (web61012.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.179.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0693943D79 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:51:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 14174 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Nov 2005 01:51:02 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rxADq2Gy7w/apaAoyvI0rtHj3zrSROc+NR8bZYExNvIg7OwzDA7w2EbQQcQOk932Y7m8sGZBpzT03BS7WvxZwz2ufx2jHydkctnQQx5GNCft+X2x+oJ5WZbLqRvGaKApU/WglWuriZfZFrcUtgkdyGgGUJKbtTymn/CO3yKSJqY= ; Message-ID: <20051109015102.14172.qmail@web61012.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.86.19.170] by web61012.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:51:01 ART Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:51:01 -0300 (ART) From: "E. J. Cerejo" To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: NOPROFILE is deprecated in favor of NO_PROFILE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 01:51:11 -0000 Hello, I just finished upgrading from FBSD 5.4 to 6.x stable and now if I want to upgrade any port I get the same warning all the time ""/usr/share/mk/bsd.compat.mk", line 36: warning: NOPROFILE is deprecated in favor of NO_PROFILE" does anyone know on how to fix this? thank you. EJC www.only7bucks.com _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! Acesso Grátis: Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora! http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 02:09:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914EB16A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 02:09:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (just.puresimplicity.net [140.177.207.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FB543D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 02:09:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (localhost.puresimplicity.net [127.0.0.1]) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA929fNl005268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:09:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hemi@just.puresimplicity.net) Received: (from hemi@localhost) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jA929fHM005267; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:09:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hemi) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:09:41 -0600 From: Josh Tolbert To: "E. J. Cerejo" Message-ID: <20051109020941.GA5237@just.puresimplicity.net> References: <20051109015102.14172.qmail@web61012.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051109015102.14172.qmail@web61012.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: NOPROFILE is deprecated in favor of NO_PROFILE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:09:43 -0000 On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:51:01PM -0300, E. J. Cerejo wrote: > Hello, > > I just finished upgrading from FBSD 5.4 to 6.x stable > and now if I want to upgrade any port I get the same > warning all the time ""/usr/share/mk/bsd.compat.mk", > line 36: warning: NOPROFILE is deprecated in favor of > NO_PROFILE" does anyone know on how to fix this? thank you. > > EJC > www.only7bucks.com Try changing NOPROFILE to NO_PROFILE in /etc/make.conf? :) Thanks, Josh -- Josh Tolbert hemi@puresimplicity.net || http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/ If your sysadmin's not being fascist, you're paying him too much. --Sam Greenfield From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 02:14:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4277316A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 02:14:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F9B43D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 02:14:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t10so93923wxc for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:14:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Rn4+TquittLm8fwGymexMyHd/7aVuzTj5nfLFhKZDtNXOANxDVmU71HMA3Lio0l2N4RDJset/O4NpqE35ysTFiJ3ajMmncvF8oGbHZ5tUEMWrIbELWLz2ZsGuEtVNuloUxQ3EfZrNrQBLCzIH9laumY9OsNMA81d2uVz6PRR1XQ= Received: by 10.65.15.11 with SMTP id s11mr183881qbi; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:49:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.253.2 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:49:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990511081749v135770c2n9a6fa6cf10ec8954@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:49:33 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: Lonnie Cumberland In-Reply-To: <437144EC.9060604@outstep.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <437144EC.9060604@outstep.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any Default Firewall Installed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:14:20 -0000 On 11/8/05, Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > Greetings All, > > I have a fresh FreeBSD 4.11 server installed with multiple IP's and am > wondering if there is some type of default firewall running? > I don't believe there will be a firewall running unless you have specifically enabled it. Statements to do so would appear in /etc/rc.conf > The problem is that after logging in, can not telnet to either localhost > or to one of the IP's, but can telnet to the other IP that is assigned > to the server. > > For this particular project and as needed by some particular software > that I have installed, I need to be able to telnet to all of the IP's > and also have SSH installed. > > I can only telnet to 1 of the 2 IP's. > > How can I fix this? Answering this will probably require more details of your configuration. The contents of /etc/rc.conf and the output of "ifconfig" would be a good start. You may wish to obfuscate any public IP numbers that appear in that information. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 03:25:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A2F16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:25:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web61020.mail.yahoo.com (web61020.mail.yahoo.com [209.73.179.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EF0A43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:25:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 92904 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Nov 2005 03:25:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OzNEH+gBHOZjNj0+ObaTNMMabCZ9uV4Yq5l9hNpx02KCx6dLmvQJ+QL+FZC1w6d3FSOJQ2NpfGHcBalC848slQzDVKSb9XSzeyCKCIoIW05nW5kuGHz0gG3uV1ZIL8pe+HeJYgdz/efL9iahnTVOjF7vlxKyK8mf8fLnxrLhOGQ= ; Message-ID: <20051109032503.92899.qmail@web61020.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.86.19.170] by web61020.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:25:03 ART Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:25:03 -0300 (ART) From: "E. J. Cerejo" To: Josh Tolbert In-Reply-To: <20051109020941.GA5237@just.puresimplicity.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: NOPROFILE is deprecated in favor of NO_PROFILE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:25:05 -0000 That worked thanks. --- Josh Tolbert escreveu: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:51:01PM -0300, E. J. > Cerejo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just finished upgrading from FBSD 5.4 to 6.x > stable > > and now if I want to upgrade any port I get the > same > > warning all the time > ""/usr/share/mk/bsd.compat.mk", > > line 36: warning: NOPROFILE is deprecated in favor > of > > NO_PROFILE" does anyone know on how to fix this? > thank you. > > > > EJC > > www.only7bucks.com > > Try changing NOPROFILE to NO_PROFILE in > /etc/make.conf? :) > > Thanks, > Josh > -- > Josh Tolbert > hemi@puresimplicity.net || > http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/ > > If your sysadmin's not being fascist, you're paying > him too much. > --Sam Greenfield > EJC www.only7bucks.com _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! Acesso Grátis: Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora! http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 03:31:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F55C16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:31:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F28743D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:31:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C905F41; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:31:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03809-03; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:31:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DD05CF8; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:31:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43716D70.1040604@mac.com> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:30:56 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vulpes Velox References: <20051025135801.GA66887@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20051108190126.424fc6d6@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <20051108190126.424fc6d6@vixen42.vulpes> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installation problem with Freebsd 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:31:36 -0000 Vulpes Velox wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:58:01 +0200 > Roland Smith wrote: [ ... ] >> One thing you could try is to burn a 6.0-RC1 CD and try that. Test >> your memory with memtest86 (http://www.memtest86.com/). > > Memtest86 does not tell you if you have bad ram. It just indicates > that something some where is wrong with that system there. I've seen > it hit errors with bad motherboards as well. It's true that problems with overheating or a bad MB will generate errors that memtest86 will see, but memtest86 is really good at noticing bad RAM. It will catch errors that the BIOS self-test won't (which isn't too hard :-), and I've never seen memtest86 fail to detect bad RAM.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 03:35:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E91116A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:35:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.198.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFBD43D4C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:35:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20051109033203014006b8qre>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:32:05 +0000 Message-ID: <43711950.3010504@computer.org> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:32:00 +0000 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jahnke@fmjassoc.com References: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:35:43 -0000 Frank Jahnke wrote: > We talked about this extensively on the ports list about a month ago, I vaguely remember the thread, but could not dig it up in the archives for some reason. > when I saw the same thing with Epiphany on 6.0-RC1. The conclusion was > that this is a bug in linuxpluginwrapper. See: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87404 > To my knowledge, this has not yet been fixed. > Yes! That's the problem exactly. In fact I was getting the 'undefined symbol' error up until I changed the libmap.conf to point to where the nppdf.so resides. At that point the error went away and the plugin was available in the about:plugins dialog. However, the pdf fails to load. Is there in fact no known workaround? Maybe an older version? Thanks. > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 03:36:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9066C16A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:36:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [63.240.77.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B52543D53 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:36:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005110903355401300biuffe>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:36:20 +0000 Message-ID: <43711A34.3040509@computer.org> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:35:48 +0000 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Hill References: <4370D736.7030502@computer.org> <20051108191142.R73778@tripel.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20051108191142.R73778@tripel.monochrome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:36:32 -0000 Chris Hill wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Eric Schuele wrote: > >> I'm having difficulties getting acroread7 to work within firefox-1.0.7. > > > [...] > >> I copied libmap.conf-FreeBSD6 to /etc/libmap.conf. Cut some stuff >> out. Left in the acroread sections (among others): >> >> # Acrobat7 with Mozilla/Firebird/Galeon/Epiphany/Konqueror >> #[/usr/compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so] >> >> [/usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so] >> >> libc.so.6 pluginwrapper/acrobat.so >> >> Note that I changed the [pointer?] to where the shared object actually >> resides. > > > I noticed. Why? > > I left mine at the default (the line you commented out above) and mine > works. That is, if I click on a hyperlink to a PDF, the PDF opens in a > browser window. > >> I also created a symlink from /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/nppdf.so >> -> >> /usr/local/lib/acroread/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so >> > > > My link in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins looks like > nppdf.so -> > /compat/linux/usr/local/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so > > Is there another nppdf.so on your system? No... just the one. > Maybe you had previously > installed a FreeBSD-native Mozilla-family browser? I think that if > you're using linuxpluginwrapper you need to point the link to the linux > nppdf.so. Just a thought. > > I'm on 5.4-RELEASE-p8, not 6.0 like you, so that may account for the > different path. Or not. But you may want to take a look in that > /compat/linux... directory and see what's there. I have... the path stops at /compat/linux/usr there is no local/ anything!? very strange. I had this all working once upon a time. Updates (no telling when) have broken it. Thanks. > > HTH... > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 03:41:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B2616A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:41:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tcpo@yahoo.com) Received: from web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D425B43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:41:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tcpo@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 79612 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Nov 2005 03:41:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XcIQCZvyACIBwbuoIY7IUG4Rc8ThCCNZ7Jh7th511xUB522nVaYzaRQWRXjUX3vefhoeqUIG0Zo4IbK7wzWCdF4oa2nA60ToJesLg7Dyct3Ex5GXEo/lr7Gnizi5Z54hQSdTMki7MVVaDN9gS8Q+PCYSxj1A1VHxkJm1EcS8NSc= ; Message-ID: <20051109034119.79610.qmail@web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:41:19 -0800 (PST) From: Stephen Po To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Compatibility with Gigabyte GA-8S661GXMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stephen Po List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:41:20 -0000 anyone has experience using Gigabyte GA-8S661GXMP with FreeBSD? the network chip is ICS1883 which is not mentioned in the hardware list. i wonder if it is supported. thanks very much! - stephen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 04:08:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF8516A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:08:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8F743D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:08:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jahnke@fmjassoc.com) Received: from pinot.fmjassoc.com (209.218.101.53.bvi2.wizwire.com [209.218.101.53]) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA948mYi026549; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:08:48 -0800 From: Frank Jahnke To: Eric Schuele In-Reply-To: <43711950.3010504@computer.org> References: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> <43711950.3010504@computer.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FMJ & Associates Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:04:40 -0800 Message-Id: <1131509080.37336.90.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@fmjassoc.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jahnke@fmjassoc.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:08:51 -0000 On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 21:32 +0000, Eric Schuele wrote: > Yes! That's the problem exactly. In fact I was getting the 'undefined > symbol' error up until I changed the libmap.conf to point to where the > nppdf.so resides. At that point the error went away and the plugin was > available in the about:plugins dialog. However, the pdf fails to load. > > Is there in fact no known workaround? Maybe an older version? The only one that I am aware of is intentionally to put the wrong directories in libmap.conf for the Adobe Reader, or remove the plugin entirely. Then you can at least choose the application that opens the PDF, at least in Gnome. That's a good working definition for a kludge, but I know of no others at the moment. You could of course use a different PDF reader, but honestly I like the Adobe Reader the best. Evince is just too slow to be useful, and the others just feel klunky to me. Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 04:13:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A404D16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:13:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.198.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012F443D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <200511090412160140067aaoe>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:12:17 +0000 Message-ID: <437122C0.6060807@computer.org> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:12:16 +0000 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Schuele References: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> <43711950.3010504@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <43711950.3010504@computer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jahnke@fmjassoc.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:13:28 -0000 Eric Schuele wrote: > Frank Jahnke wrote: > >> We talked about this extensively on the ports list about a month ago, > > > I vaguely remember the thread, but could not dig it up in the archives > for some reason. > >> when I saw the same thing with Epiphany on 6.0-RC1. The conclusion was >> that this is a bug in linuxpluginwrapper. See: >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87404 >> To my knowledge, this has not yet been fixed. >> > > Yes! That's the problem exactly. In fact I was getting the 'undefined > symbol' error up until I changed the libmap.conf to point to where the > nppdf.so resides. At that point the error went away and the plugin was > available in the about:plugins dialog. However, the pdf fails to load. > > Is there in fact no known workaround? Maybe an older version? Ok... well.. here is my workaround. YMMV. In firefox: Edit -> preferences -> downloads -> plugins disable pdfs go to download a pdf file... tell it to always automatically open with /usr/local/bin/acroread7 It opens in an external window, but still saves me a click or two. Still be nice if the plugin worked. > > Thanks. > >> Frank >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 04:22:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B3916A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:22:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949AA43D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:22:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005110904171101200mtob9e>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:17:19 +0000 Message-ID: <437123E6.2080005@computer.org> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:17:10 +0000 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jahnke@fmjassoc.com References: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> <43711950.3010504@computer.org> <1131509080.37336.90.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1131509080.37336.90.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:22:57 -0000 Frank Jahnke wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 21:32 +0000, Eric Schuele wrote: > > >>Yes! That's the problem exactly. In fact I was getting the 'undefined >>symbol' error up until I changed the libmap.conf to point to where the >>nppdf.so resides. At that point the error went away and the plugin was >>available in the about:plugins dialog. However, the pdf fails to load. >> >>Is there in fact no known workaround? Maybe an older version? > > > The only one that I am aware of is intentionally to put the wrong > directories in libmap.conf for the Adobe Reader, or remove the plugin > entirely. Then you can at least choose the application that opens the > PDF, at least in Gnome. That's a good working definition for a kludge, > but I know of no others at the moment. > Yes... thank you. I was responding to my own post when I got yours. Thanks for the help. > You could of course use a different PDF reader, but honestly I like the > Adobe Reader the best. Evince is just too slow to be useful, and the > others just feel klunky to me. > > Frank > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 04:26:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6DB16A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:26:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05C443D5C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:26:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-232-64.hsd1.tx.comcast.net[24.1.232.64]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005110904261601100mfa96e>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:26:25 +0000 Message-ID: <43712604.3020908@computer.org> Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 22:26:12 +0000 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lonnie Cumberland References: <437144EC.9060604@outstep.com> In-Reply-To: <437144EC.9060604@outstep.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any Default Firewall Installed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:26:35 -0000 Lonnie Cumberland wrote: > Greetings All, > > I have a fresh FreeBSD 4.11 server installed with multiple IP's and am > wondering if there is some type of default firewall running? > > The problem is that after logging in, can not telnet to either localhost > or to one of the IP's, but can telnet to the other IP that is assigned > to the server. > > For this particular project and as needed by some particular software > that I have installed, I need to be able to telnet to all of the IP's > and also have SSH installed. What does `sockstat -4` say? Do you have a /etc/hosts.allow? Is it configured properly? > > I can only telnet to 1 of the 2 IP's. > > How can I fix this? > > Thanks, > Lonnie > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 04:43:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F0716A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:43:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahnjoan@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184EC43D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:43:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahnjoan@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so83446wxc for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:43:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Qt+vOL9Gbr/HowKkJTI1OTWjAxw1I78ym3lXjpy+aA7urAODLuuLXPZRug0H+Q3D3Orq8r3HxaFo/QO1PJDsoL+FZ0oO5kFubsF7x+b7biEnepJ9HsSP+nvhQdKWP4jn0SJIZd+M7YTgIFIPQFCn+Y+3BV6Yqfclac7y8Dd/pMM= Received: by 10.70.100.17 with SMTP id x17mr297583wxb; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:43:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.102.7 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:43:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5e575c8a0511082043h2e0c8944x151986c46c4f756d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:43:48 -0500 From: Ahnjoan Amous To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44acgz6odh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5e575c8a0510232022m22dbb31ewa99ed10ee2a3092b@mail.gmail.com> <44acgz6odh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: default routing question ZIPB ADSL PPPoA X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:43:50 -0000 T24gMjQgT2N0IDIwMDUgMDk6MjI6MzQgLTA0MDAsIExvd2VsbCBHaWxiZXJ0IDwKZnJlZWJzZC1x dWVzdGlvbnMtbG9jYWxAYmUtd2VsbC5pbGsub3JnPiB3cm90ZToKPgo+IEFobmpvYW4gQW1vdXMg PGFobmpvYW5AZ21haWwuY29tPiB3cml0ZXM6Cj4KPiA+IFRoZSBzaG9ydCA6IEkgYmVsaWV2ZSB0 aGUgcHJvYmxlbSBJIGFtIGhhdmluZyBpcyBkdWUgdG8gcm91dGluZy4gQSBESENQCj4gPiBzZXJ2 ZXIgc2VuZHMgbWUgSVAgQS5CLkMuRCB3aXRoIGEgZGVmYXVsdCByb3V0ZSBvZiBBLkIuQy5ELiAi ZGhjbGllbnQiCj4gaXNuJ3QKPiA+IGhhbmRsaW5nIHRoaXMgd2VsbCBhbmQgSSBkb24ndCBrbm93 IGhvdyB0byBmaXggaXQuIFdpbmRvd3MgYXMgd2VsbCBhcwo+IExpbnV4Cj4gPiBESENQIGNsaWVu dHMgZG8gbm90IGhhdmUgYSBwcm9ibGVtIHdpdGggdGhpcyBhbmQgSSBhbSBhdCBteSB3aXRzIGVu ZAo+IHRyeWluZwo+ID4gdG8gZmlndXJlIG91dCB3aGF0IGNvbWJpbmF0aW9uIG9mIHJvdXRlIGNv bW1hbmRzIHdpbGwgZml4IG15IGlzc3VlLgo+ID4KPiA+IFRoZSBsb25nIDogSSBoYXZlIGEgQ2Vs bFBpcGUgQURTTCByb3V0ZXIvYnJpZGdlIGZyb20gTHVjZW50LiBUaGlzIGRldmljZQo+IGlzCj4g PiBwcm92aWRlZCBieSBvdXIgSVNQLiBJIGFtIGV4cGxvcmluZyB0aGUgWklQQiBmdW5jdGlvbmFs aXR5IG9mIHRoZSBkZXZpY2UKPiB0bwo+ID4gYWxsb3cgbXkgRnJlZUJTRCBob3N0IHRvIG93biB0 aGUgcHVibGljIElQLiBUaGUgYmFzaWNzIG9mIHRoZQo+IGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24KPiA+IGZvciB0 aG9zZSB1bmZhbWlsaWFyIGlzIGFzIGZvbGxvd3MuIFBQUG9BIGlzIGVzdGFibGlzaGVkIGJ5IHRo ZSBkZXZpY2UKPiBhbmQKPiA+IHRoZSB0aGUgKHB1YmxpYykgSVAgYWNxdWlyZWQgdGhyb3VnaCB0 aGUgcHJldmlvdXMgcHJvY2VzcyBpcyBkZWxpdmVyZWQKPiB0byBhCj4gPiBob3N0IGJlaGluZCB0 aGF0IENlbGxQaXBlIHZpYSBESENQLiBBZnRlciBESENQIHRoZSBkZXZpY2UgYWN0cyBhcyBhCj4g PiAiYnJpZGdlIiwgYWxsb3dpbmcgdGhlIGludGVybmFsIGRldmljZSB0byB1c2UgdGhlIHB1Ymxp YyBJUCBhcyBpdHMgb3duLgo+IEknbQo+ID4gc3VyZSB0aGlzIGRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIGlzIHZhZ3Vl IGJ1dCBJIGRvbid0IGtub3cgYW55IG90aGVyIHdheSB0bwo+IGV4cGxhaW4uCj4gPgo+ID4gSW5m byA6IEFmdGVyIGRoY2xpZW50IGFjcXVpcmVzIGl0cyBpbmZvIHRoZSBldGhlcm5ldCBpbnRlcmZh Y2UgbG9va3MKPiBsaWtlCj4gPiB0aGlzCj4gPiBpZmNvbmZpZyBldGhlcm5ldCBpbnRlcmZhY2Ug liBpbmV0IEEuQi5DLkQgbmV0bWFzawo+ID4gMjU1LjI1NS4yNTUuMjU1IDxodHRwOi8vMjU1LjI1 NS4yNTUuMjU1PjxodHRwOi8vMjU1LjI1NS4yNTUuMjU1Lz4KPiA+Cj4gPiBXaGVuIEkgY29ubmVj dCBhIHdpbmRvd3Mgb3IgTGludXggaG9zdCB0aGV5IHNlZW0gdG8gdHJlYXQgdGhlIGludGVyZmFj ZQo+IGFzCj4gPiB0aGUgZGVmYXVsdCByb3V0ZSBhbmQgd29yayBhcyBleHBlY3RlZC4gV2l0aCBG cmVlQlNEIEkgaGF2ZSB0cmllZAo+IHJlbW92aW5nCj4gPiBhbGwgcm91dGVzIGZvciB0aGUgZGV2 aWNlIGFmdGVyIGFzc2lnbm1lbnQsIGFuZCB0aGVuIGFkZGluZyBkZWZhdWx0Cj4gcm91dGUKPiA+ IGJhc2VkIG9uIC1pbnRlcmZhY2UgZmxhZyBmb3Igcm91dGUgY29tbWFuZC4gSSBoYXZlIGFsc28g dHJpZWQgb3BlbmluZyB1cAo+IHRoZQo+ID4gbmV0bWFzayBvbiB0aGUgZXRoZXJuZXQgaW50ZXJm YWNlIGFuZCBhZGRpbmcgYSBkZWZhdWx0IHJvdXRlIGRlc3RpbmVkCj4gZm9yCj4gPiB3aGF0IEkg a25vdyB0aGUgUFBQb0EgY29ubmVjdGlvbnMgZW5kIHBvaW50IGlzLgo+ID4KPiA+IE5vdGhpbmcg SSBoYXZlIHRyaWVkIHNlZW1zIHRvIHdvcmsuIEkgZG9uJ3QgY29uc2lkZXIgbXlzZWxmIGFuIGV4 cGVydCBieQo+IGFueQo+ID4gbWVhbnMgYnV0IHRoaXMgaXMgY2xlYXJseSBiZXlvbmQgbXkga25v d2xlZGdlLgo+ID4KPiA+IEknbSBoYXBweSB0byBwcm92aWRlIGFueSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiB5b3Ug bmVlZCBpdCB5b3UgaGF2ZSBhbiBpZGVhLgo+Cj4gU291bmRzIGxpa2UgaXQncyAicmVhbGx5IiBh biAidW5udW1iZXJlZCIgaW50ZXJmYWNlLgo+IERpZCB5b3UgdHJ5IHRoZSAiLWlmYWNlIiBvcHRp b24gdG8gcm91dGUoOCk/Cj4KCiAgTG93ZWxsIC0gVGhlIC1pZmFjZSBvcHRpb24gd29ya2VkIGZv ciBtZS4gSW4gdGhlIHNob3J0IHRlcm0gSSBoYXZlCm11dGlsYXRlZCB0aGUgZGhjbGllbnQtc2Ny aXB0IGFuZCBtYW51YWxseSBhZGRlZCB0aGUgLWlmYWNlIG9wdGlvbiB0byBlYWNoCiJyb3V0ZSBk ZWZhdWx0IiBsaW5lLiBOb3QgYXQgYWxsIHByZXR0eSBidXQgd29ya3MgZm9yIG5vdy4gVGhhbmsg eW91IGFnYWluCmZvciB0aGUgaGVscCwgaXQgaXMgbXVjaCBhcHByZWNpYXRlZC4KIEFobmpvYW4K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 05:02:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9273A16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:02:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahnjoan@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F19543D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:02:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahnjoan@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so86095wxc for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:02:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=dCAludGulSlNBPPqTb3+YbO9N01sCS/SHNoCi+iE1xen6r7WhvGbifOSHAiR7hgoQ6Ypj0095xcn21rvfg/DyUVGU7GOZOOce836TVhGcskXV5AgHfBrm8aHeQz9S1JZiJTP3B+R04RSFTuTDPWcYIba0K9STN8SPocNid1TGpM= Received: by 10.70.29.5 with SMTP id c5mr331044wxc; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:34:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.102.7 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:34:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5e575c8a0511082034u1a3d9413v413f6b5c33312838@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:34:13 -0500 From: Ahnjoan Amous To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Incorrectly followed steps to re-sync vinum subdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:02:31 -0000 Tonight while checking a few things on my personal machine I noticed that one of my vinum sub disks was stale. Included below are the steps I took attempting to remedy this. Clearly I did not follow the proper procedures and now the volume is un-mountable. Currently when I attempt to mount the /export filesystem the machine panics and reboots. My apologies in advance for the length of information included. I include it so that it might aid in recovery of the data on this filesystem. It has been cleaned up a bit but am happy to provide the full output with the multiple "help" command output. Shortly after the command sequence included the machine rebooted. Since then I have booted in to single user mode and commented out /export from fstab. The machine is fully functioning with the exception of the important data on /export. If anyone doesn't believe I will be able to recover the data on my own but does know of a company that might be able to recover data written on a vinum mirror would you send me their name? Thank you Ahnjoan root@bigbox:~ > df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/vinum/root 1012974 61138 870800 7% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/vinum/var 1012974 355886 576052 38% /var /dev/vinum/crash 2026030 6 1863942 0% /var/crash /dev/vinum/tmp 1012974 16 931922 0% /tmp /dev/vinum/usr 8122126 4714322 2758034 63% /usr /dev/vinum/home 4058062 6922 3726496 0% /home /dev/vinum/tmp1 50777034 35262392 11452480 75% /export procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc devfs 1 1 0 100% /var/db/dhcpd/dev ###########################################################################= ### root@bigbox:~ > vinum list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: stale D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ###########################################################################= ### root@bigbox:~ > vinum vinum -> detach tmp1.p0.s0 ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: stale D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> start tmp1.p0.s0 Can't start tmp1.p0.s0: Invalid argument (22) ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> start ** no additional drives found: No such file or directory Can't save Vinum config: No child processes ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> start tmp1.p0.s0 Can't start tmp1.p0.s0: Invalid argument (22) ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: R 0% D: been Size: 50 GB *** Start tmp1.p0.s0 with 'start' command *** S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> stop tmp1.p0.s0 ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: down D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> start tmp1.p0.s0 Can't start tmp1.p0.s0: Device busy (16) ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: reborn D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> stop tmp1.p0.s0 ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> setstate obsolete tmp1.p0.s0 ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> start tmp1.p0.s0 ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (10%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ###########################################################################= ### vinum -> quit ###########################################################################= ### root@bigbox:~ > cd /export ###########################################################################= ### root@bigbox:/export > ls .snap archive CRASH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 05:09:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EED16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:09:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from blake.darche@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D048543D4C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:09:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from blake.darche@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so119165wxc for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:09:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=oOtP4votvkZEfLaBcgKmIGZTPFTJuJr8MACc1FFBFgvOgqzyvJ0dYwA0mwczQde0NfLHrIYUEFHkIX+Sk2y9Nkx5acNIxs7V/3448ZdtWWFsmpWzxMZND0pFqYQepjJ47MnBUoaILX7bZ2JSgNw5Jow3e0mrpnvsAyQ8E8Qul98= Received: by 10.70.131.19 with SMTP id e19mr363659wxd; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:03:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.40.7 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:03:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <287fd0790511082103g6164c2d9j4ad53ef4470ba900@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:03:39 -0500 From: Blake Darche To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: xfce4-desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:09:46 -0000 I think xfce4-desktop port is broken. I updated my ports tree earlier tonight and did a portupgrade tonight and it broke. It worked earlier today... It appears some xfce4 ports have gone to 4.3.2.1 and some have not: user123@kilo$ pkg_info | grep xfce gtk-xfce-engine-2.2.8 An XFCE engine for GTK 2.0 libxfce4gui-4.2.3 XFce 4 widget library required by xfce4 and xfwm4 libxfce4mcs-4.2.3 XFce 4 settings management library used by most XFce 4 = modu libxfce4util-4.2.3.1 XFce 4 library with non-graphical helper functions xfce-4.2.3.1 The "meta-port" for the XFce 4 desktop environment xfce4-appfinder-4.2.3 Find application in the system supporting Desktop entry for xfce4-desktop-4.2.3 XFce 4 desktop background manager and root menu xfce4-fm-4.2.3 XFce 4 file manager xfce4-icon-theme-4.2.3 Icon themes for XFce 4 xfce4-iconbox-4.2.3 XFce 4 icon box, an alternative taskbar xfce4-mcs-manager-4.2.3 XFce 4 settings manager xfce4-mcs-plugins-4.2.3 XFce 4 settings manager plugins xfce4-mixer-4.2.3 XFce 4 volume mixer module for xfce4-panel xfce4-panel-4.2.3 XFce 4 panel module xfce4-print-4.2.3 XFce 4 graphical frontend for printing xfce4-session-4.2.3 Session manager for the Xfce 4 desktop environment xfce4-systray-4.2.3 XFce 4 system tray module for xfce4-panel xfce4-toys-4.2.3 Toys for the XFce 4 panel xfce4-trigger-launcher-4.2.3 A command trigger plugin for xfce4-panel xfce4-utils-4.2.3 XFce 4 essential utilities and scripts xfce4-wm-4.2.3.1 XFce 4 window manager Anyone got any ideas? xfce still works, just no desktop background, and no right clicking on the desktop. And of course the X11 standard screen of grey squares where the desktop picture used to be. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 05:41:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF8F16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C3F443D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:41:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 78777 invoked by uid 0); 9 Nov 2005 05:41:37 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 05:41:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA95cFAJ002418; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:38:15 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Message-ID: <43718B47.5020201@alphaque.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:38:15 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051026 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sunil Kumar References: <20051108202456.16719.qmail@web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051108202456.16719.qmail@web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel 2200bg wireless lan support in FreeBSD6.0 stable release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:41:43 -0000 On 11/09/05 04:24 Sunil Kumar said the following: > 1. Is there a document/help site where the steps are documented? http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ipw/iwi-freebsd.html > 2. If I execute "kldload -v if_iwi" then in the dmesg output, i get a > message saying "download firmware". What firmware should i have to > download? I cannot use ports collection(pkg_add or make install clean) install /usr/ports/net/iwi-firmware, but... > because that laptop does not have ethernet connection(I think there is > no support for the Marvell Yukon 88E80836 chipset). ...since you dont have a network up and running, that may be a problem. do check if the iwi-firmware package is available on one of the 6.0 ISO CDROMs. > 3.If is execute this command " iwicontrol -i iwi0 -d > /usr/local/libdata/if_iwi -m bss" i get a error message that this iwicontrol is installed as part of iwi-firmware. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 05:41:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F4216A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:41:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BD5443D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:41:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 78780 invoked by uid 0); 9 Nov 2005 05:41:48 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 05:41:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA95Xh0f002413; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:33:43 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Message-ID: <43718A36.8000601@alphaque.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:33:42 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051026 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Schuele References: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> <43711950.3010504@computer.org> <437122C0.6060807@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <437122C0.6060807@computer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jahnke@fmjassoc.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:41:52 -0000 On 11/09/05 06:12 Eric Schuele said the following: > In firefox: > Edit -> preferences -> downloads -> plugins > disable pdfs > go to download a pdf file... tell it to always automatically open with > /usr/local/bin/acroread7 i've been following this thread, and the problem persists in mozilla-devel as well. the best workaround is still the one you've suggested. you can also do this by removing the nppdf.so symbolic link in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser-plugins. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 05:56:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1A316A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:56:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rools.ster@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FE043D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:56:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rools.ster@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t10so140472wxc for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:56:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=U6O21ihY7cjUyePuS6wB7Svw/EUMsCEFZvIV4whrxkkWaPo/2lXPECCt+UAcYPr4cF/QLTZYKiFzbYAjEkhzCHNQzvRhKjUaQn6/xeg1W4K7kY17xYnbYD+5ll0P+Kygbu6ILkZNyDXcBHrIDTo3OVRj1hfeZjWC8YjEjEzyhiU= Received: by 10.65.116.20 with SMTP id t20mr40426qbm; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:47:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.76.16 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:47:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:47:44 +0000 From: Rools S To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: LCD stuck on unusable refresh rate under FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:56:34 -0000 I am new to FreeBSD and installed the 6.0-RELEASE on an AMD64 with a Nvidia GeForce 6600 GT graphics card and a Samsung SyncMaster 930BF 19" TFT. My problem is that the vertical refresh rate seems stuck at 60Hz and the horizontal sync rate at 63.8kHz. This causes serious eye strain and I can't use the system for very long before I get a headache. The optimal settings for this monitor is 1280x1024 with hor. 80kHz and vert= . 75Hz which I can get when I plug it into a win2k box and load the Samsung drivers. I am using the open-source nv drivers for the gpu.(can't find nvidia proprietary that support 6.0-RELEASE on AMD64) My X-server setup works fine but the xorg.conf configurations don't have an impact on the refresh and sync rates. I have tried the following settings in xorg.conf: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------- Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "SAM" ModelName "SyncMaster" HorizSync 80-81 VertRefresh 75-75 EndSection Section "Modes" Identifier "1280x1024" ModeLine "1280x1024" 135.00 1280 1296 1440 1688 1024 1025 1028 1066 +hsync +vsync EndSection ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------- I've also tried without the "Modes" section and HorizSync values of 30-81 and VertRefresh values of 56-75 when I Xorg -config xorg.conf.new X works fine and but the OSD still shows the HorizSync to be 63.8 and VertRefresh 60 (on the windows box the OSD displayed the correct rates after driver setup) my /var/log/Xorg.0.log has the following lines of output: (--) NV(0): Virtual size is 1280x1024 (pitch 1280) (**) NV(0): *Default mode "1280x1024": 135.0 MHx, 80.0 kHz, 75.0 Hz (II) NV(0): Modeline "1280x1024" 135.00 1280 1296 1440 1688 1024 1025 1028 1066 +hsync +vsync there is also a section in the log: (II) NV(0): Supported VESA Video Modes: .. (II) NV(0): 1280x1025@75Hz .. My "screen" configuration in the xorg.conf file is as follows: Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 Modes "1280x1024" EndSubSection EndSection I would greatly appreciate it if someone can point me in the right directio= n on this since with the current settings my system is unusable to me. Cornelis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 08:10:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DA216A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:10:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9201043D70 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:10:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA98AhJQ093199 ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:10:43 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 165 Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (galois1.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.116]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA98AeQP019142 ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:10:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by galois1.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jA98Adge009991 ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:10:39 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by galois1.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id jA98AbiK009990; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:10:37 +0100 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:10:37 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Miguel Message-ID: <20051109081037.GA9696@math.jussieu.fr> References: <4370EE2F.5000109@123.com.sv> <20051108232251.GK16216@math.jussieu.fr> <437134C2.1060003@123.com.sv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <437134C2.1060003@123.com.sv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.165]); Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:10:43 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 4371AF03.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Cc: shih@math.jussieu.fr, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: HP DL380 hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:10:49 -0000 Le 08/11/2005 à 17:29:06-0600, Miguel a écrit > Albert Shih wrote: > > > > > > >I've DL 360 and I've use 5.4 without any problem. > > > >Have you try to disable HyperThreading in HP-Bios ? You can try to change > >the OS identification in HP-Bios too. > > > > > > > Im trying to install 6.0R, and i already disabled > > HyperThreading > > This used to be a linux gentoo machine, so the OS identification is Linux, > should i change it? I don't remenber my OS identification and I can tell you because all my server is in production (I can reboot them). But I think (but not sure) my OS identification is windows. Well you always can try, if that's don't work you can redo. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Wed Nov 9 09:09:03 CET 2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 08:20:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E1C16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:20:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982DE43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:20:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rperry@gti.net) Received: from [208.216.115.66] (ts6m-pool0-66.gti.net [208.216.115.66]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id D1CE835AD0; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:14:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4371B124.6010805@gti.net> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:19:48 -0500 From: Bob Perry User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Micah References: <4370468B.9060407@gti.net> <4370BA33.6080400@ywave.com> In-Reply-To: <4370BA33.6080400@ywave.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major Error Upgrading to GNOME 2.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:20:47 -0000 Micah wrote: > Bob Perry wrote: > >> This past weekend, I CVSup'd the ports tree and prepared to run >> portupgrade. I noticed a large number of GNOME ports in my output >> from pkg_version and, found that I would need to run the GNOME >> Project 's upgrade script to upgrade to 2.12. >> >> I use a dial-up modem had been timed out on several occasions.during >> the process This happened about three times during the night and I >> had to restart the upgrade each time. Note that I failed to use the >> restart flag recommended during the first restart. I finally ended >> up with a "succesful upgrade..." message even though I now have only >> 188 ports after beginning with 297. Amongst the missing is gnome >> 2.12 itself. >> >> I'm hoping there is some way to get things back to normal and rerun >> the upgrade without re-installing the missing ports. BTW, I did back >> up /var/db/pkg. >> >> Any advice would be appreciated. I run 5.4 -RELEASE #0. I'm running >> this message from a second machine but should be able to supply the >> logs if needed. >> >> Thanks, >> Bob Perry >> > > gnome_upgrade_lst.xxxx in your tmp folder should contain a list of all > the software that the script was going to update. Compare that list > with the output from pkg_version/portversion to see what needs > reinstalling. Reinstall it via whatever method you like (portinstall, > cd /user/port/xxx/xxx && make install). I am in a similar situation > but I had the output from portversion from before the upgrade to rely > on (and wrote a script that made a list of the differences). > > HTH, > Micah > > I was able to compare the list of files the script was going to update to output from pkg_version to get an idea of what was missing. I started with gnome2 (cd /user/port/x11/gnome2 && make install) and now have about a dozen ports left to install. (Think I'll try portmanager at a later date when I feel more comfortable with it.) I certainly want to thank you all for your help. Can't wait 'til next upgrade. Thanks, Bob Perry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 08:31:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AD116A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:31:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@servingpeace.com) Received: from smtp.servingpeace.com (servingpeace.com [69.55.225.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4976943D53 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:31:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@servingpeace.com) Received: from [10.0.0.30] (adsl-68-125-161-145.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.125.161.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.servingpeace.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA34DBA224; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 00:31:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4371B3FC.5090109@servingpeace.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:31:56 -0800 From: Sam Nilsson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave References: <004c01c5e486$23d5c550$0900a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <004c01c5e486$23d5c550$0900a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bruteforce not restarting pf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:31:59 -0000 Dave wrote: > Checking my bruteforce table ;i see 163.13.111.172/32 in it, so it was > added, but i don't get why future connections were permitted unless pf > was not restarted or informed about the updated table. which table are you checking? the in-memory table that pf uses or the on-disk table? are you saying that the ip is inserted into the text file but that it doesn't get added to the firewall? the way my setup works, bruteforceblocker.pl updates the text file *and* runs pfctl to update the firewall since AFAIK, the firewall doesn't watch the text file for changes. Make sure that you edit the settings in the bruteforceblocker.pl script itself. For instance, if your firewall table (the one in memory) isn't getting updated, make sure that you have the $pfctl variable setup correctly. - Sam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 08:56:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885F116A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:56:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gkatsanos@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F077943D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:56:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gkatsanos@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t10so172294wxc for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:56:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:disposition-notification-to; b=ueSDKBjfZeW+VVw7ZxantTkND1qT/an16J9aY8bF4d/7CnlWfKzu4VuNGygVuLei3EtXUMaB4+vyBxy+p1wCrr5YQtsyWc8fVPHOjOIa5Y72hfG/KHRAN69z+9hq2I1Z2v7jSpxuF5dJos/YbrQqGTBsW7ekiHD7B2YX0xwCkA0= Received: by 10.64.204.4 with SMTP id b4mr550966qbg; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from georgek ( [62.38.113.127]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q18sm4177097qbq.2005.11.09.00.50.34; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:50:35 -0800 (PST) From: "George Katsanos" To: , Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:50:28 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcXlCqIS/SxlwV4iTWq1BAerlGDCrA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: KDE Konqueror:Can i have konqueror without KDEstuff port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:56:48 -0000 KDE is a huge package , and if you're trying to portupgrade to p3 550 that's a hard thing to do.3 days now! :-( I just want konqueror , is there any way [or do you know the exact port] that will save me from installing kde base , kde , kdelibs and zillions of kde stuff [which I hate] at my computer? Also , when I start konqueror 'kdeinit' is run also ! 3 instances of it.any way of avoiding that? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 09:08:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFFE16A41F; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:08:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (just.puresimplicity.net [140.177.207.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5C443D45; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:08:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hemi@puresimplicity.net) Received: from just.puresimplicity.net (localhost.puresimplicity.net [127.0.0.1]) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA9986WL012555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:08:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hemi@just.puresimplicity.net) Received: (from hemi@localhost) by just.puresimplicity.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jA9986Vr012554; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:08:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hemi) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:08:06 -0600 From: Josh Tolbert To: George Katsanos Message-ID: <20051109090806.GA8073@just.puresimplicity.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE Konqueror:Can i have konqueror without KDEstuff port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:08:08 -0000 On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:50:28AM +0200, George Katsanos wrote: > > KDE is a huge package , and if you're trying to portupgrade to p3 550 that's > a hard thing to do.3 days now! :-( > I just want konqueror , is there any way [or do you know the exact port] > that will save me from installing kde base , kde , kdelibs and zillions of > kde stuff [which I hate] at my computer? > > Also , when I start konqueror 'kdeinit' is run also ! 3 instances of it.any > way of avoiding that? > > > Thanks Hi George, There used to be this browser in ports called netraider. It was Konqueror without (most of) KDE. Netraider still required Qt, but that's better than requiring Qt and all of KDE. Apparently netraider got removed a while back (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/netraider/Attic/Makefile) cause it wasn't ever updated. Thanks, Josh -- Josh Tolbert hemi@puresimplicity.net || http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/ If your sysadmin's not being fascist, you're paying him too much. --Sam Greenfield From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 10:47:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FA016A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:47:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D59A43D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:47:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb_root@videotron.ca) Received: from clk01a ([66.130.198.54]) by VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IPO00CS1OMT0BC0@VL-MO-MR003.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:47:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:47:11 -0500 From: Nicolas Blais In-reply-to: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jahnke@fmjassoc.com Message-id: <200511090547.17009.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart3541439.E2fT29ZDrV; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: e.schuele@computer.org Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 10:47:18 -0000 --nextPart3541439.E2fT29ZDrV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On November 8, 2005 07:21 pm, Frank Jahnke wrote: > We talked about this extensively on the ports list about a month ago, > when I saw the same thing with Epiphany on 6.0-RC1. The conclusion was > that this is a bug in linuxpluginwrapper. See: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D87404 > To my knowledge, this has not yet been fixed. > > Frank > =46unny thing is that when the link is fixed, it still doesn't work in Fire= fox,=20 but now Konqueror opens pdf within itself (good). Nicolas. =2D-=20 =46reeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Nov 5 12:12:36 EST 2005 =20 root@clk01a:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CLK01A=20 PGP? : http://www.clkroot.net/security/nb_root.asc --nextPart3541439.E2fT29ZDrV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDcdO0z38ton5LGeIRAjG3AJ0UYnYYaVZ0Bk9/nBo1tphmOgTj+QCfc9Lm pSsL9R31flboX+Gwpc5W4tI= =11VZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3541439.E2fT29ZDrV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 11:12:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8164616A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:12:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante.skoda@ri.t-com.hr) Received: from ls405.htnet.hr (ls405.htnet.hr [195.29.150.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B6943D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:12:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante.skoda@ri.t-com.hr) Received: from ls422.t-com.hr (ls422.t-com.hr [195.29.150.237]) by ls405.htnet.hr (0.0.0/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jA9BCBWv032154 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:12:14 +0100 Received: from ls422.t-com.hr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ls422.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 414C8988043 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:12:14 +0100 (CET) X-Envelope-Sender: ante.skoda@ri.t-com.hr Received: from ls422.t-com.hr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ls422.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id 2AA65988042 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:12:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (83-131-184-80.adsl.net.t-com.hr [83.131.184.80]) by ls422.t-com.hr (Qmlai) with ESMTP id E02A18B80D7 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:12:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4371DB4C.9060802@ri.t-com.hr> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:19:40 +0100 From: ante skoda User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RAM question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:12:17 -0000 Haw meani memory RAM is consumed by boing ? I heave aproxsimaly 512RAM. I choose project seti@home. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 11:14:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDAA16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:14:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony4.iinet.net.au (ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony4.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B76D43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:14:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from 203-217-13-157.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) ([203.217.13.157]) by ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony4.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2005 19:14:51 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== From: Warren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:17:26 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511092117.27264.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: Error Compiling Buildworld when upgrading from 5 to 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:14:53 -0000 Im trying to upgrade my 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD machine to 6 via CVS and have problems compiling Buildworld. Any help/pointers to ways to do the upgrade i may be missing are most welcome. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===> sbin/ipf/libipf (obj) /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf created for /usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf ===> sbin/ipf/ipf (obj) mkdir: /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf: File exists *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sbin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 11:59:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAD916A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:59:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@jonze.com) Received: from dogstar.jonze.com (dogstar.jonze.com [81.168.80.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8F943D4C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:59:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@jonze.com) Received: from dogstar.jonze.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dogstar.jonze.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA9Bxo57064697 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:59:51 GMT (envelope-from richard@jonze.com) Received: (from richard@localhost) by dogstar.jonze.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA9BxotY064696 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:59:50 GMT (envelope-from richard@jonze.com) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:59:50 +0000 From: Richard Jones To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051109115950.GA64673@dogstar.jonze.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2, clamav-milter version 0.86 on dogstar.jonze.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (dogstar.jonze.com [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:59:51 +0000 (GMT) Cc: Subject: Files left over from a installworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:59:53 -0000 Hi, I've been continuously upgrading my machine from (I think) RELEASE-4.8, and I'm beginning to see lots of cruft from older releases accumulating. What are the list's feelings on deleting the majority of files listed by: find / /usr -xdev -mtime +7 There are plenty there that I created or belong the packages e.g. /etc/mail/$HOSTNAME.mc and /etc/X11/XFConfig but what about, for example: /etc/netconfig /etc/pam.d/ftpd /etc/periodic/daily/100.clean-disks /etc/amd.map /sbin/ip6fw /sbin/ilmid /lib/libdevstat.so.4 /lib/libutil.so.4 /rescue/ipmon Obviously dollops of common sense are needed, but has anyone attempted to formalize this type spring cleaning? Regards, Richard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 12:15:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABA716A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:15:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55F0D43D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:15:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Nov 2005 12:07:41 -0000 Received: from pD952DFA4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO p4-3200.local) [217.82.223.164] by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 09 Nov 2005 13:07:41 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4870692 From: Andreas Rudisch To: Warren In-Reply-To: <200511092117.27264.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> References: <200511092117.27264.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vUV5ZNTSW0s66K/4Hbod" Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:07:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1131538058.4280.1.camel@p4-3200.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error Compiling Buildworld when upgrading from 5 to 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:15:04 -0000 --=-vUV5ZNTSW0s66K/4Hbod Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:17 +1000, Warren wrote: > Im trying to upgrade my 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD machine to 6 via CVS and have=20 > problems compiling Buildworld. >=20 > Any help/pointers to ways to do the upgrade i may be missing are most wel= come. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> sbin/ipf/libipf (obj) > /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf created for /usr/src/sbin/ipf/libipf > =3D=3D=3D> sbin/ipf/ipf (obj) > mkdir: /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf: File exists > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf/ipf. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/sbin/ipf. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/sbin. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. >=20 You might want to read section 20.4.16.6 of the Handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html --=20 GnuPG key : 0xD25FCC81 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc Fingerprint: D182 6F22 7EEC DD4C 0F6E 564C 691B 0372 D25F CC81 --=-vUV5ZNTSW0s66K/4Hbod Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDceaKaRsDctJfzIERAr+nAJ4hGDsp43W2Lyzn+BWFcDC1uMDauQCeNyOC +6PhYVLfaBUPiSxa0EjGzOc= =myEh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vUV5ZNTSW0s66K/4Hbod-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 12:22:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C69616A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:22:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B0843D4C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:22:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jA9CMFiu011923; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:22:15 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:22:42 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1131495673.37336.72.camel@localhost> <200511090547.17009.nb_root@videotron.ca> In-Reply-To: <200511090547.17009.nb_root@videotron.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511090422.42931.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: jahnke@fmjassoc.com, e.schuele@computer.org, Nicolas Blais Subject: Re: Firefox + acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:22:50 -0000 On Wednesday 09 November 2005 02:47 am, Nicolas Blais wrote: > On November 8, 2005 07:21 pm, Frank Jahnke wrote: > > We talked about this extensively on the ports list about a month > > ago, when I saw the same thing with Epiphany on 6.0-RC1. The > > conclusion was that this is a bug in linuxpluginwrapper. See: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87404 > > To my knowledge, this has not yet been fixed. > > > > Frank > > Funny thing is that when the link is fixed, it still doesn't work in > Firefox, but now Konqueror opens pdf within itself (good). > I had the same problem with firefox but I had assigned acroread5 as the pdf handler in the preferences>downloads. When I changed it to acroread7, it also read the pdf file. Kent > Nicolas. -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 12:41:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CE916A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:41:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony5.iinet.net.au (ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony5.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D504843D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:41:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: from 203-217-13-157.perm.iinet.net.au (HELO warren.shinji.nq.nu) ([203.217.13.157]) by ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony5.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2005 20:41:23 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== From: Warren To: Andreas Rudisch Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:43:59 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511092117.27264.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <1131538058.4280.1.camel@p4-3200.local> In-Reply-To: <1131538058.4280.1.camel@p4-3200.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511092244.00221.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error Compiling Buildworld when upgrading from 5 to 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:41:26 -0000 Thanks, this solved the prob :) > You might want to read section 20.4.16.6 of the Handbook. > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://www.shinji.nq.nu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 07:39:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA0916A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:39:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxwellkakulu@yahoo.com) Received: from web34610.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34610.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.68.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 448E843D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:39:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxwellkakulu@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 37513 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Nov 2005 07:39:55 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QA/ngNbtLlKvDE8Ii4YGfq816Y7kozF45c9PAVOvh4tGU+0FEnTHQY59J+7rTUczZPzO1NGk0VKxABImwkIFcRjQiYJz2FGYTy0hVIPnn8/9/JfsUG9jX5Av6b5b1kTQvf8l6ICWxcvf3B+phnw9x/aX+ck207rhSk+DLu7TSUA= ; Message-ID: <20051109073955.37511.qmail@web34610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [80.179.107.230] by web34610.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:39:55 PST Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:39:55 -0800 (PST) From: Maxwell Kakulu To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:05:06 +0000 Cc: Subject: vb6/mssql server and php/mysql applications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 07:39:56 -0000 Hi, please will my vb6 distributed applications with an mssql server back end and php,javascript/mysql web applications run easily on freebsd as they run on windows?. 'Hope you'll reply me very soon. My email add. is maxwellkakulu@yahoo.com. Thank you, best regards. __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 13:11:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02DB16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (fw1.wmptl.com [216.8.159.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B4443D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:11:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA9DBf9w092914; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:11:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <4371F553.3070106@wmptl.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:10:43 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxwell Kakulu References: <20051109073955.37511.qmail@web34610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20051109073955.37511.qmail@web34610.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.311 () RATWR10_MESSID,TDE_WS_HS_KOMBINATION X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vb6/mssql server and php/mysql applications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:11:31 -0000 Depends entirely on the VB App portion; MySQL and php/apache perform VERY well on FreeBSD, but (generally speaking) you cannot run any server-side stuff written in VB6. If your VB6 code runs entirely on a client machine running windows, and only connects to the MySQL server, then yes - it will work, and is in fact something I do quite often. You'll need the MySQL ODBC connector, (MyODBC 3.51), and a connection string as appropriate to your database/server for an ADO connection... but nonetheless it does work, and it works well too (speaking from experience). -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ Maxwell Kakulu wrote: > Hi, please will my vb6 distributed applications with > an mssql server back end and php,javascript/mysql web > applications run easily on freebsd as they run on > windows?. 'Hope you'll reply me very soon. My email > add. is maxwellkakulu@yahoo.com. Thank you, best regards. > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. > http://farechase.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 13:29:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D5C16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:29:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alistair.sutton@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EA443D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:29:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alistair.sutton@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n28so43947nfc for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:29:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=a4nWlVBVBfb4vVBub2WySdAGdb2xzvUAwwcjTbWVMlCoqpYMhvnHSx0WNJzjH6IVuW96OnLKDctAe0pfJaf8qtu0zj3xboDuRFCusS6mcBK1e7u2KPBRhjpBi5k8GnItzdvmHSA/fErhKLHyYPuROJxTqrTcbkTJQbj7wKWnq2Y= Received: by 10.48.108.17 with SMTP id g17mr189856nfc; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.3.11 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 05:22:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:22:35 +0000 From: Alistair Sutton To: Richard Jones In-Reply-To: <20051109115950.GA64673@dogstar.jonze.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051109115950.GA64673@dogstar.jonze.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Files left over from a installworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:29:10 -0000 On 09/11/05, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi, > > I've been continuously upgrading my machine from (I think) RELEASE-4.8, > and I'm beginning to see lots of cruft from older releases accumulating. > What are the list's feelings on deleting the majority of files listed > by: > > find / /usr -xdev -mtime +7 > > There are plenty there that I created or belong the packages e.g. > /etc/mail/$HOSTNAME.mc and /etc/X11/XFConfig > > but what about, for example: > > /etc/netconfig > /etc/pam.d/ftpd > /etc/periodic/daily/100.clean-disks > /etc/amd.map > /sbin/ip6fw > /sbin/ilmid > /lib/libdevstat.so.4 > /lib/libutil.so.4 > /rescue/ipmon > > Obviously dollops of common sense are needed, but has anyone attempted > to formalize this type spring cleaning? There is something that was committed to -CURRENT a month or so ago that will delete out-of-date files but I can't remember what the name of it is. I'm sure it'll get MFCed from -CURRENT at some point once it becomes more stable. Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 13:39:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CAA16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:39:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6107943D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 87172 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Nov 2005 13:39:21 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 2.928089 secs); 09 Nov 2005 13:39:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 13:39:17 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'Lonnie Cumberland'" , Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:39:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <437144EC.9060604@outstep.com> Thread-Index: AcXkxfbJkh3Ua99rRE2ykErBJi9hcAAa0g4w X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113154355867587151@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051109133922.6107943D49@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: RE: Any Default Firewall Installed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:39:23 -0000 > I have a fresh FreeBSD 4.11 server installed with multiple > IP's and am wondering if there is some type of default > firewall running? > > The problem is that after logging in, can not telnet to > either localhost or to one of the IP's, but can telnet to the > other IP that is assigned to the server. > > For this particular project and as needed by some particular > software that I have installed, I need to be able to telnet > to all of the IP's and also have SSH installed. > > I can only telnet to 1 of the 2 IP's. > > How can I fix this? Along with the other suggestions, here's one more (not to fix, but to test). If you have another FBSD box kicking around, install nmap on it: # pkg_add -r nmap # rehash ...and for each IP address on the affected box, run the following command: # nmap -sS -P0 -p 22,23 your.domain.or.ip.com # Note that the -P0 is -P(zero) ...actually, you can do this on the machine you *think* the services are running on, but the truth of the matter may be convaluted due to possible firewall evasion from going localhost to localhost. The sockstat trick as someone else mentioned will tell you if the services are listening (and who, if anyone is connected), and on which IP. An entry as such: *:23 means the service is listening on all IP's on the box. nmap will allow you to see if the ports that correlate with the service is accessable from outside the box. If both those are true, then you may have a rules problem somewhere. HTH, Steve > > Thanks, > Lonnie > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 13:42:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D32E16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:42:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFE743D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BD5222403 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:42:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51097-17 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:42:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:224:1::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE09222401 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:42:36 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 07:42:30 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1681640.fJV40kiXpq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511090742.34222.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: KDE Konqueror:Can i have konqueror without KDEstuff port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:42:39 -0000 --nextPart1681640.fJV40kiXpq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 09 November 2005 02:50 am, George Katsanos wrote: > is there any way [or do you know the exact port] that will save me from > installing kde base , kde , kdelibs and zillions of kde stuff [which I ha= te] > at my computer? No. The reason is that Konqueror *is* KDE in a very real sense. It has ve= ry=20 little functionality on its own, but instead uses parts of other packages t= o=20 do all its work. Even such "minor" things as fetching files via HTTP are=20 farmed out to KIO-slaves from other packages. Konqueror is probably more likely than any other KDE program to have an=20 enormous number of dependencies. That's by design and not really something= =20 that could be stripped down. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1681640.fJV40kiXpq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDcfzK5sRg+Y0CpvERAik2AJ47vroQa82ZpKVt1wSFgEYxc3VVpQCfeXpK n4qoyYyjKG1ycxU402ZEwoU= =umsC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1681640.fJV40kiXpq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 14:03:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224D316A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:03:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A7443D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:03:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 94417 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Nov 2005 14:03:50 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 2.873168 secs); 09 Nov 2005 14:03:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 14:03:46 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'FreeBSD Questions'" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:03:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Thread-Index: AcXlNmbTR6ioHr6xRnu/irnTh/n01w== X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113154502767594399@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051109140350.32A7443D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: viapm module failing during buildkernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:03:52 -0000 Hi all, I've got a module that fails to build repeatedly when doing buildkernel. I've tried both a modified config, and finally GENERIC with the same results. Here's what I currently have: 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 9 11:35:53 EDT 2005 ...and this is what I cvsup'ped to yesterday: *default tag=RELENG_5 I have added IPFW support, and SMP. I must admit, I have not tried GENERIC without taking out the SMP, but I will try to reproduce that next. >From what I gather, the viapm module gives one the ability to monitor certain motherboard status' on a VIA board...which I don't have. Being not experienced enough to track down the cause of the issue, how does one just eliminate a single module from being included in buildkernel to see if that is the only one that is failing? ===> i2c/controllers/viapm cc -O -pipe -DVIAPM_BASE_ADDR=0x6000 -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SQL/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SQL -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: `isa_driver' undeclared here (not in a function) /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: (near initialization for `isa_viapm_driver_mod.dmd_driver') /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: `isa_devclass' undeclared here (not in a function) /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: (near initialization for `isa_viapm_driver_mod.dmd_devclass') /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:969: error: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:969: error: (near initialization for `isa_viapropm_driver_mod.dmd_driver') /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:969: error: initializer element is not constant /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:969: error: (near initialization for `isa_viapropm_driver_mod.dmd_devclass') *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SQL. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 14:19:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3453D16A44A for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:19:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from vsmtp3.tin.it (vsmtp3alice.tin.it [212.216.176.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EDC43D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:19:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vdemart1@tin.it) Received: from pswm15.cp.tin.it (212.216.176.81) by vsmtp3.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 4371C09A00027DD9; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:18:55 +0100 Message-ID: <18975192.1131545939684.JavaMail.root@pswm15.cp.tin.it> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:18:59 +0100 (GMT+01:00) From: Vittorio To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: 193.108.204.21 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: R: Re: [R] RODBC fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vittorio List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:19:04 -0000 Dear All, Thanks to the suggestion of Prof Ripley I progressively=20 solved the many libraries problems connected to the installation of the=20 R package RODBC under FreeBSD 5.4.=20 *** As far as this OS is concerned=20 *** please take notice that the sentence in the README file:"..... Use=20 the configure options --with-odbc-include and --with-odbc-lib or environment variables ODBC_INCLUDE and ODBC_LIBS to set the include and=20 library paths as needed...." doesn't give a complete piece of info. As=20 a matter of fact, as well as setting $ODBC_INCLUDE=3D/usr/local/include=20 and $ODBC_LIBS=3D/usr/local/lib I had also to put ** $LIBS=3D- L/usr/local/lib ** which wasn't in the README (and wasn't that=20 intuitive, was it?). In so doing I solved the sql.h, sqlext.h headers=20 problem and a successive problem with the SQLTables libraries. This set=20 things straight and RODBC was compiled flawlessly. I think it would be=20 worth your while adding this piece of information in the README file. Ciao Vittorio =20 >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: vdemart1@tin.it >Data: 8-nov-2005 11.45 PM >A: >Ogg: Re: [R]=20 RODBC fails to build > >yes, I read it. Nevertheless I can't make head=20 or tail of it. >Can anyone out there help me with a step by step=20 explanation? >Ciao >Vittorio > >Alle 17:34, marted=C3=AC 08 novembre 2005,=20 Prof Brian Ripley ha scritto: >> Did you read the package's README? It=20 contains two ways to set these >> paths. >> >> On Tue, 8 Nov 2005,=20 Vittorio wrote: >> > Context:Pentium 4, FreeBSD 5.4, R 2.2.0 >> > >> >=20 I updated the extra packages I >> > had downloaded but the upgrading of=20 RODBC failed complaining: >> > >> > checking >> > for unistd.h... yes >> > checking sql.h usability... no >> > checking sql.h >> >=20 presence... no >> > checking for sql.h... no >> > checking sqlext.h=20 usability... >> > no >> > checking sqlext.h presence... no >> >=20 checking for sqlext.h... no >> > configure: error: "ODBC headers sql.h=20 and sqlext.h not found" >> > ERROR: >> > configuration failed for=20 package 'RODBC' >> > >> > The two header files are >> > present in my=20 box under /usr/local/include; I tried to symlink them to >> >=20 /usr/include and to /usr/local/lib/R/include to no avail. >> > >> >=20 Please help. >> > >> > Vittorio > >______________________________________________ >R-help@stat.math.ethz. ch mailing list >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >PLEASE=20 do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 14:28:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AF116A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:28:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB01E43D5F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:28:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 28238 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 14:28:22 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Nov 2005 14:28:21 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E540C28441; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:28:20 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: David Kelly References: <20051108150817.GA47825@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 09 Nov 2005 09:28:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051108150817.GA47825@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> Message-ID: <44wtjhaoaj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 45 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: devfs and bpf owner, group, and mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:28:28 -0000 David Kelly writes: > I'm having problems in 5.4 getting automatic ownership and mode correct > on /dev/bpf2. Added this to /etc/devfs.conf: > > # Allow group tcpdump to use bpf* > own bpf0 root:tcpdump > perm bpf0 0660 > own bpf1 root:tcpdump > perm bpf1 0660 > own bpf2 root:tcpdump > perm bpf2 0660 > > And this to /etc/devfs.rules: > > [devfsrules_bpf=5] > add path 'bpf*' mode 0660 group tcpdump > > The intent is to allow members of group "tcpdump" to use /dev/bpf2 > without being root. The above creates /dev/bpf[012] as desired at boot > but some time later /dev/bpf2 disappears. > > System has two NICs, xl0 and fxp0. At this time fxp0 is not being used. > Vlan0 is configured (as a VLAN of course) on xl0, and thats where I need > /dev/bpf2 for tcpdump to see what my stuff is doing. > > If missing, /dev/bpf2 is created automatically when tcpdump opens, but > its not created with the same ownership and mode as during reboot. > > Suspect my problem is related to [devfsrules_bpf=5] or the fact I > haven't informed the system to apply this rule to the /dev filesystem. Good guess. I'm still on my first cup of coffee, and might have taken a few more minutes to spot that. > So where is the 'i' that I've failed to dot? try adding 'devfs_system_ruleset="devfsrules_bpf"' to rc.conf. To apply it before reboot would be something roughly like 'devfs /dev ruleset devfsrules_bpf'. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 14:50:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB9616A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp1.versatel.nl (smtp1.versatel.nl [62.58.50.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906D743D5A for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:50:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 6213 invoked by uid 0); 9 Nov 2005 14:50:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp1.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 9 Nov 2005 14:50:49 -0000 Message-ID: <43720CCD.1060200@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:50:53 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051015) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: George Katsanos References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: KDE Konqueror:Can i have konqueror without KDEstuff port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:50:59 -0000 George Katsanos wrote: > >KDE is a huge package , and if you're trying to portupgrade to p3 550 that's >a hard thing to do.3 days now! :-( >I just want konqueror , is there any way [or do you know the exact port] >that will save me from installing kde base , kde , kdelibs and zillions of >kde stuff [which I hate] at my computer? > >Also , when I start konqueror 'kdeinit' is run also ! 3 instances of it.any >way of avoiding that? > > >Thanks >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > I sometimes use Konqueror when as 'explorer-clone'. And as well as you I didn't realy like the hell of KDE pakages on my system, so I deinstalled the useless KDE stuff.I think this will be the least possible packages running Konqueror without stripping the packages itself: frank@Riza$ pkg_info | grep kde kdebase-3.4.2_2 Basic applications for the KDE system kdebase-kompmgr-3.4.2 Utility needed to enable XComposite support in KDE kdehier-1.0_8 Utility port which installs a hierarchy of shared KDE direc kdelibs-3.4.2_1 Base set of libraries needed by KDE programs That's all you need for Konqueror and the Graphical Editor I frequently use: KATE Good Luck -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 14:51:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBB416A424 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:51:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: from mail.outstep.com (www.outstep.com [205.177.73.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C529543D6A for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:51:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonnie@outstep.com) Received: (qmail 16668 invoked by uid 509); 9 Nov 2005 06:52:42 -0800 Received: from 70.120.87.170 by GeneralC.outstep.com (envelope-from , uid 507) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.83/1166. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(70.120.87.170):SA:0(-2.3/1.0):. Processed in 1.166325 secs); 09 Nov 2005 14:52:42 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=1.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: lonnie@outstep.com via GeneralC.outstep.com X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(70.120.87.170):SA:0(-2.3/1.0):. Processed in 1.166325 secs Process 16659) Received: from cpe-70-120-87-170.satx.res.rr.com (HELO ?192.168.0.114?) (lonnie@outstep.com@70.120.87.170) by mail.outstep.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 06:52:40 -0800 Message-ID: <43720CE4.5090102@outstep.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 08:51:16 -0600 From: Lonnie Cumberland User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Bertrand Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any Default Firewall Installed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:51:31 -0000 Hi All, I ran the nmap and it shows that some filtering is going on for the IP: ---------------------------- Starting nmap 3.77 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2005-11-09 14:45 PST Interesting ports on cp.peoplesquest.com (207.226.17.186): PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp filtered ssh 23/tcp filtered telnet Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 3.039 seconds cp# nmap -sS -P0 -p 22,23 207.226.17.189 Starting nmap 3.77 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2005-11-09 14:45 PST Interesting ports on 207.226.17.189: PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp open ssh 23/tcp open telnet Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 5.037 seconds ---------------------------- So now I need to see about adjusting that filtering in the rules I guess? Is this some firewall thing in FreeBSD that is running by default? Thanks Lonnie Steve Bertrand wrote: >>I have a fresh FreeBSD 4.11 server installed with multiple >>IP's and am wondering if there is some type of default >>firewall running? >> >>The problem is that after logging in, can not telnet to >>either localhost or to one of the IP's, but can telnet to the >>other IP that is assigned to the server. >> >>For this particular project and as needed by some particular >>software that I have installed, I need to be able to telnet >>to all of the IP's and also have SSH installed. >> >>I can only telnet to 1 of the 2 IP's. >> >>How can I fix this? >> >> > >Along with the other suggestions, here's one more (not to fix, but to >test). > >If you have another FBSD box kicking around, install nmap on it: > ># pkg_add -r nmap ># rehash > >...and for each IP address on the affected box, run the following >command: > ># nmap -sS -P0 -p 22,23 your.domain.or.ip.com > ># Note that the -P0 is -P(zero) > >...actually, you can do this on the machine you *think* the services are >running on, but the truth of the matter may be convaluted due to >possible firewall evasion from going localhost to localhost. > >The sockstat trick as someone else mentioned will tell you if the >services are listening (and who, if anyone is connected), and on which >IP. An entry as such: *:23 means the service is listening on all IP's on >the box. > >nmap will allow you to see if the ports that correlate with the service >is accessable from outside the box. > >If both those are true, then you may have a rules problem somewhere. > >HTH, > >Steve > > > >>Thanks, >>Lonnie >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 14:52:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE7D16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:52:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephanweaver@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay20-f24.bay20.hotmail.com [64.4.54.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D84C43D99 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:52:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephanweaver@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:52:02 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 209.94.222.190 by by20fd.bay20.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:52:02 GMT X-Originating-IP: [209.94.222.190] X-Originating-Email: [stephanweaver@hotmail.com] X-Sender: stephanweaver@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <565961618.20051108210653@free.fr> From: "Stephan Weaver" To: gollum123@free.fr Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 10:52:02 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2005 14:52:02.0615 (UTC) FILETIME=[24FB6C70:01C5E53D] Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Imp Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:52:04 -0000 Nothing logs to httpd-error but i get this in httpd-access 192.168.0.161 - - [09/Nov/2005:10:53:40 -0400] "GET /index.php HTTP/1.1" 302 5 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; {13E6E5B2-3CE2-10A1-C9BB-0003F986FE3F})" This is displayed in my IE browser when i try to view the web page. "The page cannot be displayed" "Cannot find server or DNS Error Internet Explorer " But http://192.168.0.199/imp/test.php Seems to work. These are the errors i get from that test page. Required IMP Configuration Files config/conf.php: No The file ./config/conf.php appears to be missing. You must generate this file as an administrator via Horde. See horde/docs/INSTALL. Thank You again. >From: Mathieu CHATEAU >Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU >To: "Stephan Weaver" >CC: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Imp Port >Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:06:53 +0100 > >Hello Stephan, > >can you be more precise ? > >it a 404 ? > >what does say /var/log/httpd-error.log ? > >have you registred php in you apache conf ? >(AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3 .php4 .php5) > >cheers, >Mathieu CHATEAU > >Tuesday, November 8, 2005, 8:58:58 PM, you wrote: > >SW> I have installed imp from the ports. >SW> when i try to log on to the imp webpage, >SW> [http://192.168.0.199/imp] i just >SW> get this page cannot be displayed. > >SW> What can i do to further troubleshoot this problem? > > >SW> ps. Please email me at stephanweaver@hotmail.com as i am not on the >mailing >SW> list. >SW> Thank you guys >SW> Stephan Weaver > >SW> _________________________________________________________________ >SW> Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! >SW> http://search.msn.com/ > >SW> _______________________________________________ >SW> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >SW> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >SW> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >SW> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >-- >Best regards, > Mathieu mailto:gollum123@free.fr > _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 14:57:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3608D16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:57:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Ewald.Jenisch@oekb.at) Received: from srvdmz13.oekb.co.at (srvdmz13.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A3943D6D for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:57:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Ewald.Jenisch@oekb.at) X-SEF-Processed: 5_0_0_816__2005_11_09_15_57_24 X-SEF-EB89CDFD-460A-478E-BCAC-B017B9EC121B: 1 Received: from Unknown [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz13.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (5.0); Mi, 09 Nov 2005 15:57:24 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:57:24 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.oekb.co.at [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA9EvO5g088851 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:57:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ej@aurora.oekb.co.at) Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jA9EvOpC088848 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:57:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ej) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:57:24 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051109145724.GA84717@aurora.oekb.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2005 14:57:24.0773 (UTC) FILETIME=[E500D550:01C5E53D] Subject: Kernel build failed in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:57:31 -0000 Hi, While compiling a fresh kernel for a 5.4 system cvsup-ed as per today the build process ran into a stop with the exact messages below. Please note that "make buildworld" completed without any errors only "make buildkernel kernconf=EJ-SMP" died. Also tried to cleanup everything (i.e. remove /usr/obj/* as per the Handbook) and starting a fresh "make buildworld" followed by "make buildkernel" but the errors remained. Please note that my "custom" kernel is nothing more than a re-name of the SMP-kernel at the moment: # pwd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf # diff SMP EJ-SMP 9c9 < ident SMP-GENERIC --- > ident EJ-SMP Finally I tried cvsup-ing the source-tree again (cvsup -g -L 2 ./stable-supfile ) and re-running the build process but this too didn't help anything. Has anybody else experienced these problems? Thanks much in advance for any clue, -ewald ------------------------------ < Cut here > ------------------------------ # make buildkernel KERNCONF=EJ-SMP ===> i2c/controllers/viapm cc -O -pipe -DVIAPM_BASE_ADDR=0x6000 -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -in clude /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EJ-SMP/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../i nclude -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EJ-SMP -mno-align -long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-ss e2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions - std=c99 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: ` isa_driver' undeclared here (not in a function) /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: i nitializer element is not constant /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: ( near initialization for `isa_viapm_driver_mod.dmd_driver') /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: ` isa_devclass' undeclared here (not in a function) /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: i nitializer element is not constant /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:968: error: ( near initialization for `isa_viapm_driver_mod.dmd_devclass') /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:969: error: i nitializer element is not constant /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:969: error: ( near initialization for `isa_viapropm_driver_mod.dmd_driver') /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:969: error: i nitializer element is not constant /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c:969: error: ( near initialization for `isa_viapropm_driver_mod.dmd_devclass') *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EJ-SMP. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. root@aurora src # -- ........................................................................ Dr. Mag. Ewald Jenisch OeKB - Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG IT Dept. 1011 Vienna, Strauchgasse 1-3, Austria Phone: +43-1-53127-2175, Fax: +43-1-53127-4175 email: ewald.jenisch@oekb.at | nic-hdl: EJ63 | GnuPG Key-ID: 0x55E72F60 http://www.oekb.co.at ........................................................................ This message is confidential and intended solely for the addressee. It is likely to be subject to banking secrecy. If you have received this e-mail erroneously, please contact the sender and delete it from your computer, otherwise any use of this information may lead to detrimental legal consequences. Anyone communicating with us by e-mail accepts the risks involved with the potential loss of confidentiality. Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den Adressaten bestimmt. Sie unterliegt wahrscheinlich dem Bankgeheimnis. Wenn Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, kontaktieren Sie bitte den Absender und löschen Sie die E-Mail von Ihrem Computer, andernfalls kann jede Verwendung dieser Informationen nachteilige Rechtsfolgen auslösen. Jeder, der mit uns über E-Mail kommuniziert, akzeptiert die mit dem möglichen Verlust von Vertraulichkeit verbundenen Risken. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 15:22:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FD916A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:22:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C2643D4C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:22:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 11197 invoked by uid 0); 9 Nov 2005 15:16:44 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (69.73.60.132) by smtp3.knology.net with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 15:16:44 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id AC1B66232; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:22:46 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:22:46 -0600 From: David Kelly To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051109152246.GA53278@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <20051108150817.GA47825@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <44wtjhaoaj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44wtjhaoaj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: devfs and bpf owner, group, and mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:22:49 -0000 On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:28:20AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > David Kelly writes: > > > I'm having problems in 5.4 getting automatic ownership and mode correct > > on /dev/bpf2. Added this to /etc/devfs.conf: [...] > > Suspect my problem is related to [devfsrules_bpf=5] or the fact I > > haven't informed the system to apply this rule to the /dev filesystem. > > Good guess. I'm still on my first cup of coffee, and might have taken > a few more minutes to spot that. I got stuck in /etc/rc.subr studying the devfs routines without thinking to search for where they were called, /etc/rc.d/devfs. > > So where is the 'i' that I've failed to dot? > > try adding 'devfs_system_ruleset="devfsrules_bpf"' to rc.conf. Thats a leap I still haven't grasped from documentation and reading the scripts. Exactly the sort of thing hoped for by asking here! > To apply it before reboot would be something roughly like > 'devfs /dev ruleset devfsrules_bpf'. First couple of tries on variations of that didn't go. When is devfs.rules read? This did work: devfs add path 'bpf*' mode 0660 group tcpdump But by that time I had "devfs -m /dev ruleset 5" in effect which may have contributed to "devfs add path". /dev/bpf2 didn't exist, as mere user I launched tcpdump on my vlan0 device and /dev/bpf2 was created correctly! Hurray! Will see if 'devfs_system_ruleset="devfsrules_bpf"' works on reboot sometime later. :-) -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 16:07:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E11C16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:07:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F8843D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 58885 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Nov 2005 16:07:46 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 9.411056 secs); 09 Nov 2005 16:07:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 16:07:36 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'Ewald Jenisch'" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:07:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <20051109145724.GA84717@aurora.oekb.co.at> Thread-Index: AcXlRj1ehjpPJiy0QN+t3SrX8zCgqwAASxGA X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113155245767558864@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051109160747.D3F8843D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: Kernel build failed in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:07:48 -0000 > While compiling a fresh kernel for a 5.4 system cvsup-ed as=20 > per today the build process ran into a stop with the exact=20 > messages below. Please note that "make buildworld" completed=20 > without any errors only "make buildkernel kernconf=3DEJ-SMP" died. >=20 > Also tried to cleanup everything (i.e. remove /usr/obj/* as per the > Handbook) and starting a fresh "make buildworld" followed by=20 > "make buildkernel" but the errors remained. My email from earlier with the subject: "viapm module failing during buildkernel" will confirm that this is two of us experiencing the EXACT same issue. I haven't found a workaround yet. My next try will be disabling SMP support. I'll let you know if this works or not. Otherwise, I'm on the hunt for how to disable building of this module. Steve >=20 > Please note that my "custom" kernel is nothing more than a=20 > re-name of the SMP-kernel at the moment: >=20 > # pwd > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf > # diff SMP EJ-SMP > 9c9 > < ident SMP-GENERIC > --- > > ident EJ-SMP >=20 >=20 > Finally I tried cvsup-ing the source-tree again (cvsup -g -L=20 > 2 ./stable-supfile ) and re-running the build process but=20 > this too didn't help anything. >=20 > Has anybody else experienced these problems? >=20 > Thanks much in advance for any clue, > -ewald >=20 > ------------------------------ < Cut here >=20 > ------------------------------ >=20 >=20 > # make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DEJ-SMP > =3D=3D=3D> i2c/controllers/viapm > cc -O -pipe -DVIAPM_BASE_ADDR=3D0x6000 -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE=20 > -nostdinc -I- -in > clude /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EJ-SMP/opt_global.h -I. -I@=20 > -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../i nclude -finline-limit=3D8000=20 > -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EJ-SMP -mno-align=20 > -long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -mno-mmx=20 > -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-ss > e2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs=20 > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith=20 > -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions - > std=3Dc99 -c=20 > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:968: error: ` isa_driver' undeclared here (not in a function) > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:968: error: i nitializer element is not constant > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:968: error: ( near initialization for=20 > `isa_viapm_driver_mod.dmd_driver') > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:968: error: ` isa_devclass' undeclared here (not in a function) > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:968: error: i nitializer element is not constant > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:968: error: ( near initialization for=20 > `isa_viapm_driver_mod.dmd_devclass') > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:969: error: i nitializer element is not constant > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:969: error: ( near initialization for=20 > `isa_viapropm_driver_mod.dmd_driver') > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:969: error: i nitializer element is not constant > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > pm.c:969: error: ( near initialization for=20 > `isa_viapropm_driver_mod.dmd_devclass') > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EJ-SMP. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > root@aurora src #=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > .............................................................. > .......... > Dr. Mag. Ewald Jenisch >=20 > OeKB - Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG > IT Dept. > 1011 Vienna, Strauchgasse 1-3, Austria > Phone: +43-1-53127-2175, Fax: +43-1-53127-4175 > email: ewald.jenisch@oekb.at | nic-hdl: EJ63 | GnuPG Key-ID:=20 > 0x55E72F60 http://www.oekb.co.at=20 > .............................................................. > .......... >=20 > This message is confidential and intended solely for the=20 > addressee. It is likely to be subject to banking secrecy. If=20 > you have received this e-mail erroneously, please contact the=20 > sender and delete it from your computer, otherwise any use of=20 > this information may lead to detrimental legal consequences.=20 > Anyone communicating with us by e-mail accepts the risks=20 > involved with the potential loss of confidentiality. >=20 > Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur f=FCr den Adressaten=20 > bestimmt. Sie unterliegt wahrscheinlich dem Bankgeheimnis.=20 > Wenn Sie diese E-Mail irrt=FCmlich erhalten haben, kontaktieren=20 > Sie bitte den Absender und l=F6schen Sie die E-Mail von Ihrem=20 > Computer, andernfalls kann jede Verwendung dieser=20 > Informationen nachteilige Rechtsfolgen ausl=F6sen. Jeder, der=20 > mit uns =FCber E-Mail kommuniziert, akzeptiert die mit dem=20 > m=F6glichen Verlust von Vertraulichkeit verbundenen Risken. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 16:16:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBD016A421 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:16:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFA543D4C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:16:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 40718 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 16:16:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 16:16:58 -0000 Message-ID: <43722100.8050600@123.com.sv> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 10:17:04 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <4370EE2F.5000109@123.com.sv> <20051108232251.GK16216@math.jussieu.fr> <437134C2.1060003@123.com.sv> <20051109081037.GA9696@math.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20051109081037.GA9696@math.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: HP DL380 hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:16:01 -0000 Albert Shih wrote: > > >I don't remenber my OS identification and I can tell you because all my >server is in production (I can reboot them). But I think (but not sure) my >OS identification is windows. > Albert, i tried all the OS types, the only one that worked was Other OS, what is the meaning of this ? What is the diference between select linux or windows, do you have an idea why only works with other os ? --- Miguel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 16:23:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373E216A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:23:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63A043D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:23:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E821A3C27; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2EFA52055; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:23:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:23:22 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Alistair Sutton Message-ID: <20051109162322.GA93640@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051109115950.GA64673@dogstar.jonze.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Richard Jones Subject: Re: Files left over from a installworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:23:24 -0000 --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:22:35PM +0000, Alistair Sutton wrote: > On 09/11/05, Richard Jones wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been continuously upgrading my machine from (I think) RELEASE-4.8, > > and I'm beginning to see lots of cruft from older releases accumulating. > > What are the list's feelings on deleting the majority of files listed > > by: > > > > find / /usr -xdev -mtime +7 > > > > There are plenty there that I created or belong the packages e.g. > > /etc/mail/$HOSTNAME.mc and /etc/X11/XFConfig > > > > but what about, for example: > > > > /etc/netconfig > > /etc/pam.d/ftpd > > /etc/periodic/daily/100.clean-disks > > /etc/amd.map > > /sbin/ip6fw > > /sbin/ilmid > > /lib/libdevstat.so.4 > > /lib/libutil.so.4 > > /rescue/ipmon > > > > Obviously dollops of common sense are needed, but has anyone attempted > > to formalize this type spring cleaning? >=20 > There is something that was committed to -CURRENT a month or so ago > that will delete out-of-date files but I can't remember what the name > of it is. 'make delete-old' and 'make delete-old-libs'. > I'm sure it'll get MFCed from -CURRENT at some point once it becomes > more stable. It's not too hard to back-port it yourself (e.g. if you're using 6.0 you can just cvs update the /usr/src/Makefile* and ObsoleteFiles.inc). This won't work after the first 6.0 file is removed from -CURRENT, and on't try it on anything before 6.0, obviously! Kris --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDciJ6Wry0BWjoQKURArb8AJ9Q4BuAVsKgYCxwoGlnAoYxTmhflgCgjfzn HpRy41TGs3i5LDjtuzR0/I4= =kCWk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 16:24:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F6616A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:24:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB40843D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:24:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 59784 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Nov 2005 16:24:42 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 2.86013 secs); 09 Nov 2005 16:24:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 16:24:38 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'Ewald Jenisch'" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:24:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <20051109160747.D3F8843D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Thread-Index: AcXlRj1ehjpPJiy0QN+t3SrX8zCgqwAASxGAAACHBuA= X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113155347967559778@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051109162442.EB40843D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: Kernel build failed in/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:24:44 -0000 > > While compiling a fresh kernel for a 5.4 system cvsup-ed as=20 > per today=20 > > the build process ran into a stop with the exact messages below.=20 > > Please note that "make buildworld" completed without any=20 > errors only=20 > > "make buildkernel kernconf=3DEJ-SMP" died. > >=20 > > Also tried to cleanup everything (i.e. remove /usr/obj/* as per the > > Handbook) and starting a fresh "make buildworld" followed by "make=20 > > buildkernel" but the errors remained. >=20 > My email from earlier with the subject: >=20 > "viapm module failing during buildkernel" >=20 > will confirm that this is two of us experiencing the EXACT same issue. >=20 > I haven't found a workaround yet. My next try will be=20 > disabling SMP support. I'll let you know if this works or=20 > not. Otherwise, I'm on the hunt for how to disable building=20 > of this module. Here is what I am trying now (please disregard wrap). # rm -rvf /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SQL/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/via pm # cd /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers # mv viapm /home/steve/usr.src.sys.modules.i2c.controllers.viapm # ee Makefile ...then I deleted the viapm entry under SUBDIR, and saved the file # cd /usr/src # make buildkernel I know that moving the directory was probably redundant, but nonetheless...it's running now. I'll post back with findings. Steve >=20 > Steve >=20 > >=20 > > Please note that my "custom" kernel is nothing more than a=20 > re-name of=20 > > the SMP-kernel at the moment: > >=20 > > # pwd > > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf > > # diff SMP EJ-SMP > > 9c9 > > < ident SMP-GENERIC > > --- > > > ident EJ-SMP > >=20 > >=20 > > Finally I tried cvsup-ing the source-tree again (cvsup -g -L > > 2 ./stable-supfile ) and re-running the build process but this too=20 > > didn't help anything. > >=20 > > Has anybody else experienced these problems? > >=20 > > Thanks much in advance for any clue, > > -ewald > >=20 > > ------------------------------ < Cut here > > > ------------------------------ > >=20 > >=20 > > # make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DEJ-SMP > > =3D=3D=3D> i2c/controllers/viapm > > cc -O -pipe -DVIAPM_BASE_ADDR=3D0x6000 -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE=20 > > -nostdinc -I- -in > > clude /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EJ-SMP/opt_global.h -I. -I@=20 > > -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../i nclude -finline-limit=3D8000 -fno-common =20 > > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EJ-SMP -mno-align -long-strings=20 > > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-ss > > e2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs=20 > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline=20 > > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions - > > std=3Dc99 -c > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/viapm.c > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:968: error: ` isa_driver' undeclared here (not in a function)=20 > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:968: error: i nitializer element is not constant=20 > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:968: error: ( near initialization for > > `isa_viapm_driver_mod.dmd_driver') > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:968: error: ` isa_devclass' undeclared here (not in a=20 > function)=20 > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:968: error: i nitializer element is not constant=20 > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:968: error: ( near initialization for > > `isa_viapm_driver_mod.dmd_devclass') > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:969: error: i nitializer element is not constant=20 > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:969: error: ( near initialization for > > `isa_viapropm_driver_mod.dmd_driver') > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:969: error: i nitializer element is not constant=20 > > /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm/../../../../pci/via > > pm.c:969: error: ( near initialization for > > `isa_viapropm_driver_mod.dmd_devclass') > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm. > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers. > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c. > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EJ-SMP. > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > >=20 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > root@aurora src # > >=20 > >=20 > > -- > > .............................................................. > > .......... > > Dr. Mag. Ewald Jenisch > >=20 > > OeKB - Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG IT Dept. > > 1011 Vienna, Strauchgasse 1-3, Austria > > Phone: +43-1-53127-2175, Fax: +43-1-53127-4175 > > email: ewald.jenisch@oekb.at | nic-hdl: EJ63 | GnuPG Key-ID:=20 > > 0x55E72F60 http://www.oekb.co.at > > .............................................................. > > .......... > >=20 > > This message is confidential and intended solely for the=20 > addressee. It=20 > > is likely to be subject to banking secrecy. If you have=20 > received this=20 > > e-mail erroneously, please contact the sender and delete it=20 > from your=20 > > computer, otherwise any use of this information may lead to=20 > > detrimental legal consequences. > > Anyone communicating with us by e-mail accepts the risks=20 > involved with=20 > > the potential loss of confidentiality. > >=20 > > Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur f=FCr den Adressaten=20 > bestimmt.=20 > > Sie unterliegt wahrscheinlich dem Bankgeheimnis. > > Wenn Sie diese E-Mail irrt=FCmlich erhalten haben, kontaktieren Sie=20 > > bitte den Absender und l=F6schen Sie die E-Mail von Ihrem Computer,=20 > > andernfalls kann jede Verwendung dieser Informationen nachteilige=20 > > Rechtsfolgen ausl=F6sen. Jeder, der mit uns =FCber E-Mail = kommuniziert,=20 > > akzeptiert die mit dem m=F6glichen Verlust von Vertraulichkeit=20 > > verbundenen Risken. > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=20 > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 16:57:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D115116A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:57:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCFE43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:57:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 61455 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Nov 2005 16:57:33 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 3.189175 secs); 09 Nov 2005 16:57:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 16:57:29 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'Ewald Jenisch'" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:57:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <20051109162442.EB40843D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Thread-Index: AcXlRj1ehjpPJiy0QN+t3SrX8zCgqwAASxGAAACHBuAAAR/YkA== X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113155545067561449@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051109165734.2DCFE43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: Kernel build failed in/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:57:35 -0000 > > > While compiling a fresh kernel for a 5.4 system cvsup-ed as > > per today > > > the build process ran into a stop with the exact messages below. > > > Please note that "make buildworld" completed without any > > errors only > > > "make buildkernel kernconf=EJ-SMP" died. > > > > > > Also tried to cleanup everything (i.e. remove /usr/obj/* > as per the > > > Handbook) and starting a fresh "make buildworld" followed > by "make > > > buildkernel" but the errors remained. > > > > My email from earlier with the subject: > > > > "viapm module failing during buildkernel" > > > > will confirm that this is two of us experiencing the EXACT > same issue. > > > > I haven't found a workaround yet. My next try will be disabling SMP > > support. I'll let you know if this works or not. Otherwise, > I'm on the > > hunt for how to disable building of this module. > > Here is what I am trying now (please disregard wrap). > > # rm -rvf > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SQL/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/contr > ollers/via > pm > > # cd /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers > # mv viapm /home/steve/usr.src.sys.modules.i2c.controllers.viapm > > # ee Makefile > ...then I deleted the viapm entry under SUBDIR, and saved the file > > # cd /usr/src > # make buildkernel > > I know that moving the directory was probably redundant, but > nonetheless...it's running now. I'll post back with findings. After doing the above: -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Kernel build for SQL completed on Wed Nov 9 11:47:15 EST 2005 -------------------------------------------------------------- [1] Done make buildkernel KERNCONF=SQL ..now, I am going to install it. However, this is going to be a great time for me to get more familiar with diff, and compare source from previous version to find out what exactly broke. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 17:00:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EE816A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:00:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bconklin@masongeneral.com) Received: from fw.masongeneral.com (list.masongeneral.com [66.119.204.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F9C43D67 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:59:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bconklin@masongeneral.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by fw.masongeneral.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E8B15459 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw.masongeneral.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fw.masongeneral.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85961-09 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:59:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by fw.masongeneral.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 387C715468; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:59:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.masongeneral.com (mx1.masongeneral.com [172.31.195.56]) by fw.masongeneral.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575381543E for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:59:41 -0800 (PST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:59:41 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: cvsup problem Thread-Index: AcXlTvnWh6oyWKanSTSs6Ks8LlYnLw== From: "Brian E. Conklin" To: X-Privacy-Notice: Please visit http://www.masongeneral.com/HIPAA.htm X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at masongeneral.com Subject: cvsup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:00:01 -0000 Hello All, I'm having a problem with cvsup on two of my machines. Both cvsup jobs were giving me errors saying "TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed". I googled this and found an = entry saying that something went awry in the checkout files. SO I deleted the /var/db/sup directory as recommended by that posting. Now I am getting a = new error. When running "/usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 -h = cvsup10.us.freebsd.org /etc/ports-supfile" I get the following output: Parsing supfile "/etc/ports-supfile" Connecting to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org Server software version: SNAP_16_1h Negotiating file attribute support Exchanging collection information Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection Running Detailer failed: Network write failure: Connection closed Will retry at 08:54:05 It doesn't matter what server I connect to, I get the same error. uname -a reports: FreeBSD netmon1.masongeneral.com 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun = May 8 10:21:06 UTC 2005 = root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Thanks in advance for any ideas and help. Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE Director of Information Services Mason General Hospital ====================================================================== Mason General Hospital 901 Mt. View Drive PO Box 1668 Shelton, WA 98584 http://www.masongeneral.com (360) 426-1611 ====================================================================== This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee nor authorized to receive for the addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the message. Replying to this message constitutes consent to electronic monitoring of this message. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 17:04:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1FE16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:04:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A70943D62 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:04:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 61792 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Nov 2005 17:04:47 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 2.860568 secs); 09 Nov 2005 17:04:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 17:04:43 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'Ewald Jenisch'" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:04:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <20051109162442.EB40843D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Thread-Index: AcXlRj1ehjpPJiy0QN+t3SrX8zCgqwAASxGAAACHBuAAAXzRcA== X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113155588467561786@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051109170448.0A70943D62@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: Kernel build failed in/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:04:50 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Steve Bertrand > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 11:25 AM > To: 'Ewald Jenisch' > Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' > Subject: RE: Kernel build failed > in/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm > > > > > While compiling a fresh kernel for a 5.4 system cvsup-ed as > > per today > > > the build process ran into a stop with the exact messages below. > > > Please note that "make buildworld" completed without any > > errors only > > > "make buildkernel kernconf=EJ-SMP" died. > > > > > > Also tried to cleanup everything (i.e. remove /usr/obj/* > as per the > > > Handbook) and starting a fresh "make buildworld" followed > by "make > > > buildkernel" but the errors remained. > > > > My email from earlier with the subject: > > > > "viapm module failing during buildkernel" > > > > will confirm that this is two of us experiencing the EXACT > same issue. > > > > I haven't found a workaround yet. My next try will be disabling SMP > > support. I'll let you know if this works or not. Otherwise, > I'm on the > > hunt for how to disable building of this module. > > Here is what I am trying now (please disregard wrap). > > # rm -rvf > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SQL/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/contr > ollers/via > pm > > # cd /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers > # mv viapm /home/steve/usr.src.sys.modules.i2c.controllers.viapm > > # ee Makefile > ...then I deleted the viapm entry under SUBDIR, and saved the file > > # cd /usr/src > # make buildkernel > > I know that moving the directory was probably redundant, but > nonetheless...it's running now. I'll post back with findings. I just did another cvsup, and there were updates to certain isa source files within the last few minutes. I'm going to try to rebuild another kernel after putting back what I had changed, and see if the patched files fix this particular issue. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 17:08:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE0716A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:08:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from hfmel001.lsafrance.com (hfmel001.lsafrance.com [84.246.106.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3049443D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:08:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: (qmail 1061 invoked by uid 1011); 9 Nov 2005 17:08:50 -0000 Received: from 192.168.0.202 by hfmel001.lsafrance.com (envelope-from , uid 1010) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.202):SA:0(-4.3/4.8):. Processed in 6.232467 secs); 09 Nov 2005 17:08:50 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=4.8 X-Antivirus-LSAFRANCE-Mail-From: gollum123@free.fr via hfmel001.lsafrance.com X-Antivirus-LSAFRANCE: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.202):SA:0(-4.3/4.8):. Processed in 6.232467 secs Process 1045) Received: from bigboy.newscreation.com (HELO ?192.168.0.202?) (192.168.0.202) by hfmel001.lsafrance.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 17:08:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:08:11 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) Professional Organization: LSA France X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <17222278.20051109180811@lsafrance.com> To: "Stephan Weaver" In-Reply-To: References: <565961618.20051108210653@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Imp Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:08:20 -0000 Hello Stephan, 302 means "moved temporarly" your index.php may contain a redirection to another url. i think the good url should be: http://192.168.0.199/imp/index.php (did you try it ?) did you set up imp (config.php) ? imp use horde (the framework) did you configure it ? Wednesday, November 9, 2005, 3:52:02 PM, you wrote: SW> Nothing logs to httpd-error SW> but i get this in httpd-access SW> 192.168.0.161 - - [09/Nov/2005:10:53:40 -0400] "GET /index.php HTTP/1.1" 302 SW> 5 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; SW> {13E6E5B2-3CE2-10A1-C9BB-0003F986FE3F})" SW> This is displayed in my IE browser when i try to view the web page. SW> "The page cannot be displayed" SW> "Cannot find server or DNS Error SW> Internet Explorer " SW> But http://192.168.0.199/imp/test.php Seems to work. SW> These are the errors i get from that test page. SW> Required IMP Configuration Files SW> config/conf.php: No SW> The file ./config/conf.php appears to be missing. You must generate this SW> file as an administrator via Horde. See horde/docs/INSTALL. SW> Thank You again. >>From: Mathieu CHATEAU >>Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU >>To: "Stephan Weaver" >>CC: questions@freebsd.org >>Subject: Re: Imp Port >>Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:06:53 +0100 >> >>Hello Stephan, >> >>can you be more precise ? >> >>it a 404 ? >> >>what does say /var/log/httpd-error.log ? >> >>have you registred php in you apache conf ? >>(AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3 .php4 .php5) >> >>cheers, >>Mathieu CHATEAU >> >>Tuesday, November 8, 2005, 8:58:58 PM, you wrote: >> >>SW> I have installed imp from the ports. >>SW> when i try to log on to the imp webpage, >>SW> [http://192.168.0.199/imp] i just >>SW> get this page cannot be displayed. >> >>SW> What can i do to further troubleshoot this problem? >> >> >>SW> ps. Please email me at stephanweaver@hotmail.com as i am not on the >>mailing >>SW> list. >>SW> Thank you guys >>SW> Stephan Weaver >> >>SW> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>SW> Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! >>SW> http://search.msn.com/ >> >>SW> _______________________________________________ >>SW> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>SW> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>SW> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>SW> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >>-- >>Best regards, >> Mathieu mailto:gollum123@free.fr >> SW> _________________________________________________________________ SW> Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! SW> http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ -- Best regards, Mathieu mailto:gollum123@free.fr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 17:10:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4F416A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efrenba@yahoo.es) Received: from web25508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDAB743D5E for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:09:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efrenba@yahoo.es) Received: (qmail 67028 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Nov 2005 17:09:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.es; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LSK3Exl9njacnNfUb0AMxEHGgRxJMUwLnCKYY9pxkqbnJDOce6jwkaAJnY30/u4s1tNltPfKIYavELpkvNvppBtBGbj1ttuiAAqcsbCZfSbwtsEBRyAQM3Gp5uWLB7X3LCTDMbd9ktXD/UPP5A2d3x7AjzTH0GNTLucLvkMqjZs= ; Message-ID: <20051109170933.67026.qmail@web25508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.59.144.88] by web25508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:09:33 CET Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:09:33 +0100 (CET) From: Efren Bravo To: freeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:10:05 -0000 Hi, I just want to make a only question. IPNAT(rdr command) is not able to redirect from a norouteable ip spaces to any other ip segment, for instance in my case, from public lan 192.168.80.0/24 to private lan 7.96.160.0/24? I'm confused because map command works fine with these two ip spaces but rdr not, although the statistics point out the opposite. Thanks for your time Efren Bravo. ______________________________________________ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! Nuevos servicios, más seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 17:21:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9C416A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:21:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from ares.ptitoliv.net (ares.ptitoliv.net [195.140.141.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D72F43D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:21:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ares.ptitoliv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839CD208E for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:23:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from ares.ptitoliv.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ares.ptitoliv.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57277-09 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:23:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.ptitoliv.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ares.ptitoliv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6172084 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:23:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from 82.228.88.181 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ptitoliv) by webmail.ptitoliv.net with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:23:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4191.82.228.88.181.1131557008.squirrel@webmail.ptitoliv.net> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:23:28 +0100 (CET) From: "ptitoliv" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ares.ptitoliv.net Subject: Where is GDM ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:21:58 -0000 Hello everybody, I am trying to install GDM on a new BSD 6.0 box. I tried to compile the port and to install the package but there is the sameproblem, gdm binaries are not available after the install ? Did I do something wrong or is there a bug ? Thank you for your answers Best regards ptitoliv From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 17:35:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6041516A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:35:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilverstrim@athensasd.org) Received: from mail.athensasd.k12.pa.us (rrcs-24-97-187-226.nys.biz.rr.com [24.97.187.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC52243D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:35:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilverstrim@athensasd.org) Received: from [172.16.0.190] ([172.16.0.190]) by mail.athensasd.k12.pa.us with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:35:51 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <06fe145ebc265841b4c499f5dc1e72ab@athensasd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: Free BSD Questions list From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:36:43 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2005 17:35:51.0644 (UTC) FILETIME=[078A39C0:01C5E554] Subject: log file conversion (OT?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:35:56 -0000 I have Squid running on a FreeBSD system and the log file (access.log) has lines like 1131556815.537 101 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET http://www.urprize2.com/adv77/images/header_08_23_05.gif - NONE/- image/gif 1131556815.584 47 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 1828 GET http://www.urprize2.com/adv77/images/timer.swf - NONE/- application/x-shockwave-flash in it. Is there a simple way or a one- or two-liner script that can take the epoch time in the first column and replace it with the actual time/date stamp in human-readable format? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 17:37:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD9516A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:37:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (ntweb04.msdihosting.net [66.199.153.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F95B43D55 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:37:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([24.201.183.241]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id B3Q02104 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:37:31 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109122614.0466c9a8@pop.msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:37:04 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ian Lord Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Web Balancing with multicast X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:37:12 -0000 Hi, is there an application to load balance web traffic using multicast on freebsd ? We have web servers currently running NLB (network load balancing) on windows 2003 that works this way (simplified for clarity): We have server A that listen on ip 10.10.10.11 We have server A that listen on ip 10.10.10.12 Both server also listen to "virtual ip" 10.10.10.10. That ip is in fact a multicast ip so that a request going to that ip is received by both server. Windows load balancing then decide which of the 2 machines process the request. It also adapts itself if a server is added or removed from the cluster (manually or on a failure) I saw there is a way with freebsd to add a machine in front of the cluster that will direct the traffic and load balance the traffic between a group of computers, but I'm looking for a solution similar to windows load balancing that doesnt require a dedicated machine in front of the cluster. If someone knows of an app that could do that, I would appreciate if you could give me a url for the software in question... Please don't mention solutions that require the use of a dedicated machine in front of the cluster. If there is no way to do this on freebsd, I will simply use a cisco load balancer in front of my freebsd servers Thanks a lot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 17:40:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F326B16A423 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:40:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from ares.ptitoliv.net (ares.ptitoliv.net [195.140.141.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FD843D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:40:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ares.ptitoliv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0AC208E for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:41:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from ares.ptitoliv.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ares.ptitoliv.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59627-07 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:41:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.ptitoliv.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ares.ptitoliv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F712084 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:41:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from 82.228.88.181 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ptitoliv) by webmail.ptitoliv.net with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:41:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4325.82.228.88.181.1131558092.squirrel@webmail.ptitoliv.net> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:41:32 +0100 (CET) From: "ptitoliv" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ares.ptitoliv.net Subject: Re: Where is GDM ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:40:02 -0000 Oops sorry it was my fault. Just a little path problem. Sorry. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 17:51:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F4116A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:51:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from data2@cablespeed.com) Received: from admin.cablespeed.com (admin.cablespeed.com [216.15.205.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F52443D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:51:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from data2@cablespeed.com) Received: from [24.56.220.5] (HELO mdm246a3e4f6fc) by admin.cablespeed.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 59753110; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:51:41 -0600 Message-ID: <06e801c5e556$7971daa0$05dc3818@mdm246a3e4f6fc> From: "Jon Krause" To: , "Ian Lord" References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109122614.0466c9a8@pop.msdi.ca> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:53:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Subject: Re: Web Balancing with multicast X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:51:42 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Lord" Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:37 PM Subject: Web Balancing with multicast > Hi, > > is there an application to load balance web traffic using multicast > on freebsd ? > > We have web servers currently running NLB (network load balancing) on > windows 2003 that works this way (simplified for clarity): > > We have server A that listen on ip 10.10.10.11 > We have server A that listen on ip 10.10.10.12 > > Both server also listen to "virtual ip" 10.10.10.10. That ip is in > fact a multicast ip so that a request going to that ip is received by > both server. Windows load balancing then decide which of the 2 > machines process the request. It also adapts itself if a server is > added or removed from the cluster (manually or on a failure) > > I saw there is a way with freebsd to add a machine in front of the > cluster that will direct the traffic and load balance the traffic > between a group of computers, but I'm looking for a solution similar > to windows load balancing that doesnt require a dedicated machine in > front of the cluster. > > If someone knows of an app that could do that, I would appreciate if > you could give me a url for the software in question... > > Please don't mention solutions that require the use of a dedicated > machine in front of the cluster. If there is no way to do this on > freebsd, I will simply use a cisco load balancer in front of my freebsd servers > > Thanks a lot > Please see CARP: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/net/ucarp/pkg-descr I think this might be what you are looking for. Best, Jon _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 18:03:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6014616A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:03:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mailgate.bytemobile.com (mailgate.bytemobile.com [209.10.233.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DF543D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:03:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:03:53 -0800 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Bart Silverstrim Message-ID: <20051109180353.GA10584@flame.pc> References: <06fe145ebc265841b4c499f5dc1e72ab@athensasd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <06fe145ebc265841b4c499f5dc1e72ab@athensasd.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2005 18:03:56.0555 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3D33DB0:01C5E557] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: log file conversion (OT?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:03:58 -0000 On 2005-11-09 12:36, Bart Silverstrim wrote: > I have Squid running on a FreeBSD system and the log file (access.log) > has lines like > > 1131556815.537 101 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET > http://www.urprize2.com/adv77/images/header_08_23_05.gif - NONE/- > image/gif > 1131556815.584 47 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 1828 GET > http://www.urprize2.com/adv77/images/timer.swf - NONE/- > application/x-shockwave-flash > > in it. Is there a simple way or a one- or two-liner script > that can take the epoch time in the first column and replace it > with the actual time/date stamp in human-readable format? Yes. Perl should work fine here. $ echo '1131556815.537 101 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET' | \ perl -MPOSIX=strftime \ -pe 'chomp; @x=split /\./; \ $ts = strftime "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", (localtime($x[0])); \ $_=$ts.".".join(".",@x[1,$#x])."\n";' 2005-11-09 09:20:15.537 101 172.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET PS: Please, ignore the automatically forced 'footer' below, until I find a way to post messages without crap added automatically by the Exchange relay I'm forced to use these days. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, do not forward this email to any other person, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 18:06:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E667116A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:06:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (pearl.ibctech.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5A943D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:06:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 65220 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Nov 2005 18:06:19 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(209.167.16.15):. Processed in 3.04703 secs); 09 Nov 2005 18:06:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fuze) (209.167.16.15) by pearl.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 18:06:15 -0000 From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "'Ewald Jenisch'" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:06:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <20051109170448.0A70943D62@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Thread-Index: AcXlRj1ehjpPJiy0QN+t3SrX8zCgqwAASxGAAACHBuAAAXzRcAACDd6w X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <113155957667565214@pearl.ibctech.ca> Message-Id: <20051109180620.3F5A943D49@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: Kernel build failed in/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:06:21 -0000 > I'm going to try to rebuild another kernel after putting back > what I had changed, and see if the patched files fix this > particular issue. FYI... the updated patches to some isa source files earlier on fixed the issue we were having with viapm module breaking. Steve > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 18:24:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C6F16A429 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:24:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC6243D58 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:24:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C51222405 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:24:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87298-02 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:24:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD078222401 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:24:15 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:24:04 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8321223.7cvJ3nM81t"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: cvsup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:24:26 -0000 --nextPart8321223.7cvJ3nM81t Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 09 November 2005 10:59, Brian E. Conklin wrote: > Parsing supfile "/etc/ports-supfile" > Connecting to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org Why is everyone trying to using cvsup10 all of a sudden? I don't think I'v= e=20 ever made it past 5. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart8321223.7cvJ3nM81t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDcj7N5sRg+Y0CpvERAtHPAKCl13/lohacHAY9EaowSDrNbFw44gCggSbA 3KEG9rYpgE0cbPrDZhHcxsQ= =cuWN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8321223.7cvJ3nM81t-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 18:41:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40DE16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:41:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6423443D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:41:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 25924 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 18:41:23 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Nov 2005 18:41:23 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A32CD28444; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:41:22 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Steve Bertrand" References: <20051109180620.3F5A943D49@mx1.FreeBSD.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 09 Nov 2005 13:41:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051109180620.3F5A943D49@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <44fyq5d5pp.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' , 'Ewald Jenisch' Subject: Re: Kernel build failed in/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:41:24 -0000 "Steve Bertrand" writes: > > I'm going to try to rebuild another kernel after putting back > > what I had changed, and see if the patched files fix this > > particular issue. > > FYI... the updated patches to some isa source files earlier on fixed the > issue we were having with viapm module breaking. Waiting an hour before reporting a problem is often a good idea. It's extremely common for the problems to be fixed by the relevant commiter in the meantime. Also see make.conf(5), especially WITHOUT_MODULES. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 18:43:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A81116A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:43:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD4843D53 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:43:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 18035 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 18:43:15 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Nov 2005 18:43:15 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 83CCE28444; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:43:14 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "ke.han" References: <4370E07F.5030309@redstarling.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 09 Nov 2005 13:43:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4370E07F.5030309@redstarling.com> Message-ID: <44br0td5ml.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 26 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: receiving serial console output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:43:16 -0000 "ke.han" writes: > I need to capture output from the 3rd phase boot of freeBSD 6. I have > a new server (which is the pc whose output needs capturing) and a > laptop with freeBSD 6 working well. > > I have read the handbook section > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html > > The handbook seems thorough on this subject, but not quite the "howto" > that a newbie like me requires. > > From my reading, I distill my process as: > 1 - connect a null modem cable between server and laptop. ok, I can > do this. > 2 - at the server boot loader prompt, enter the command: > set console="comconsole" > 3 - then enter command: > boot > 4 - now what?? I assume there is some software and setting to use on > the laptop to receive the output from the server console??? I am > happy just to receive it all to a file if that is easy enough. Can > someone please supply the missing link?? tip(1) or cu(1)? minicom from ports? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 18:43:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D767616A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilverstrim@athensasd.org) Received: from mail.athensasd.k12.pa.us (rrcs-24-97-187-226.nys.biz.rr.com [24.97.187.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE6F43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilverstrim@athensasd.org) Received: from [172.16.0.190] ([172.16.0.190]) by mail.athensasd.k12.pa.us with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:43:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051109180353.GA10584@flame.pc> References: <06fe145ebc265841b4c499f5dc1e72ab@athensasd.org> <20051109180353.GA10584@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:44:44 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2005 18:43:52.0347 (UTC) FILETIME=[87D416B0:01C5E55D] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: log file conversion (OT?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:43:54 -0000 On Nov 9, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-11-09 12:36, Bart Silverstrim > wrote: >> I have Squid running on a FreeBSD system and the log file (access.log) >> has lines like >> >> 1131556815.537 101 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET >> http://www.urprize2.com/adv77/images/header_08_23_05.gif - NONE/- >> image/gif >> 1131556815.584 47 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 1828 GET >> http://www.urprize2.com/adv77/images/timer.swf - NONE/- >> application/x-shockwave-flash >> >> in it. Is there a simple way or a one- or two-liner script >> that can take the epoch time in the first column and replace it >> with the actual time/date stamp in human-readable format? > > Yes. Perl should work fine here. > > $ echo '1131556815.537 101 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET' > | \ > perl -MPOSIX=strftime \ > -pe 'chomp; @x=split /\./; \ > $ts = strftime "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", (localtime($x[0])); \ > $_=$ts.".".join(".",@x[1,$#x])."\n";' > 2005-11-09 09:20:15.537 101 172.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET Is there a way to get it to take in each line of the logfile and output it to a new file? It wouldn't be as easy as a "cat access.log | (perl code here) >> newfile.log" would it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 18:44:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F4516A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:44:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6A443D67 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jA9IhXiu019245 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:43:34 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:44:04 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: cvsup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:44:18 -0000 On Wednesday 09 November 2005 10:24 am, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Wednesday 09 November 2005 10:59, Brian E. Conklin wrote: > > Parsing supfile "/etc/ports-supfile" > > Connecting to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org > > Why is everyone trying to using cvsup10 all of a sudden? I don't > think I've ever made it past 5. There is a port called fastest_cvsup. If you run it, it is supposed to tell you which site will give you the best response. I think the rational is that a mirror close to you will have the least impact. I have also found that the shortest mirror update is not always provided by the best response. Fastest_cvsup will also enumerate which mirrors are not responding. This can be from a failure or they are too busy. If you run a cron job, you don't like to see a lot of failures because they are too busy. If you have a mirror, you can see how they are impacted by a session, which is why I am against cvsuping src, ports, and doc at the same frequency. If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do it. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 18:48:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C213E16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:48:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mailgate.bytemobile.com (mailgate.bytemobile.com [209.10.233.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCFF43D69 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:48:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:48:14 -0800 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Bart Silverstrim Message-ID: <20051109184814.GA57162@flame.pc> References: <06fe145ebc265841b4c499f5dc1e72ab@athensasd.org> <20051109180353.GA10584@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2005 18:48:17.0744 (UTC) FILETIME=[26047500:01C5E55E] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: log file conversion (OT?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:48:18 -0000 On 2005-11-09 13:44, Bart Silverstrim wrote: > On Nov 9, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >Yes. Perl should work fine here. > > > > $ echo '1131556815.537 101 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET' | \ > > perl -MPOSIX=strftime \ > > -pe 'chomp; @x=split /\./; \ > > $ts = strftime "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", (localtime($x[0])); \ > > $_=$ts.".".join(".",@x[1,$#x])."\n";' > > 2005-11-09 09:20:15.537 101 172.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET > > Is there a way to get it to take in each line of the logfile and output > it to a new file? It wouldn't be as easy as a "cat access.log | (perl > code here) >> newfile.log" would it? Of course it would :) This is why I used the -pe option when I wrote the script above, to make sure that Perl acts as a 'filter'. - Giorgos PS: Please, ignore the automatically forced 'footer' below, until I find a way to post messages without crap added automatically by the Exchange relay I'm forced to use these days. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, do not forward this email to any other person, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 18:52:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A5F16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:52:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilverstrim@athensasd.org) Received: from mail.athensasd.k12.pa.us (rrcs-24-97-187-226.nys.biz.rr.com [24.97.187.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36D743D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilverstrim@athensasd.org) Received: from [172.16.0.190] ([172.16.0.190]) by mail.athensasd.k12.pa.us with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:52:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051109184814.GA57162@flame.pc> References: <06fe145ebc265841b4c499f5dc1e72ab@athensasd.org> <20051109180353.GA10584@flame.pc> <20051109184814.GA57162@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <296d6450a57b88f22ad227ec4e629283@athensasd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:52:57 -0500 To: Giorgos Keramidas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2005 18:52:05.0222 (UTC) FILETIME=[AD9AD860:01C5E55E] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: log file conversion (OT?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:52:06 -0000 On Nov 9, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-11-09 13:44, Bart Silverstrim > wrote: >> On Nov 9, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>> Yes. Perl should work fine here. >>> >>> $ echo '1131556815.537 101 172.16.2.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET' >>> | \ >>> perl -MPOSIX=strftime \ >>> -pe 'chomp; @x=split /\./; \ >>> $ts = strftime "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", (localtime($x[0])); \ >>> $_=$ts.".".join(".",@x[1,$#x])."\n";' >>> 2005-11-09 09:20:15.537 101 172.153 TCP_HIT/200 35674 GET >> >> Is there a way to get it to take in each line of the logfile and >> output >> it to a new file? It wouldn't be as easy as a "cat access.log | (perl >> code here) >> newfile.log" would it? > > Of course it would :) > > This is why I used the -pe option when I wrote the script above, to > make > sure that Perl acts as a 'filter'. > > - Giorgos Thank you, I'll give it a try as soon as I can :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 19:13:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765C916A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAB843D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:13:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AC0222404 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:13:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85576-12 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:13:52 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F3F222401 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:13:52 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:13:50 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com> <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1224237.IUAtTk56ce"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:13:54 -0000 --nextPart1224237.IUAtTk56ce Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote: > If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do > it. Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10= =20 times the changes? Anyway, I've fallen in love with portsnap. Is there any reason in the worl= d=20 why a normal user (eg one that doesn't need to fetch a version of ports=20 from a specific date or tag) shouldn't completely switch to portsnap today? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1224237.IUAtTk56ce Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDckpu5sRg+Y0CpvERAvCiAKCUOFm98Qwf4GtkAaM5OZlbzZ2jJwCfbN4k CRiNlprzGiLIyiROiSzuKrQ= =pYMX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1224237.IUAtTk56ce-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 19:39:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB34B16A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:39:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd5mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4876743D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:39:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cperciva@freebsd.org) Received: from pd5mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr4so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.168]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IPP00GXIDA1FI00@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:39:37 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml4so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.148]) by pd5mr4so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IPP00K4NDA1G1L0@pd5mr4so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:39:37 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.0.60] (S0106006067227a4a.vc.shawcable.net [24.87.209.6]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IPP007LZDA02I@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:39:37 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:39:36 -0800 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> To: Kirk Strauser Message-id: <43725078.6000303@freebsd.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 References: <200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com> <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> <200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051001) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:39:39 -0000 Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote: >>If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do >>it. > > Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10 > times the changes? Yes. Each time you run CVSup, it transmits a list of all the files in the tree; if your ports tree is almost up-to-date already, then this "overhead" cost is in fact the largest contributor to the bandwidth used. This problem does not occur with portsnap to any significant extent; updating once an hour uses less than 1% extra bandwidth compared to updating every day. > Anyway, I've fallen in love with portsnap. Is there any reason in the world > why a normal user (eg one that doesn't need to fetch a version of ports > from a specific date or tag) shouldn't completely switch to portsnap today? The other common reason for being unable to use portsnap is if a user has made their own personal changes to a port (e.g., an added patch). Portsnap will remove such changes the next time the port is updated, while cvs will attempt to merge the modifications. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 19:58:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793FB16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:58:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (ntweb04.msdihosting.net [66.199.153.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A1643D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:58:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([24.201.183.241]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id B3Q02104; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:58:27 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109131857.04659908@pop.msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:57:57 -0500 To: "Jon Krause" , From: Ian Lord In-Reply-To: <06e801c5e556$7971daa0$05dc3818@mdm246a3e4f6fc> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109122614.0466c9a8@pop.msdi.ca> <06e801c5e556$7971daa0$05dc3818@mdm246a3e4f6fc> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Web Balancing with multicast X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:58:07 -0000 Thanks for the hint, but this is an active/passive software so only one host can answer request while others wait to see if they need to become master (because master has failed) At 12:53 2005-11-09, Jon Krause wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ian Lord" >Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:37 PM >Subject: Web Balancing with multicast > > > > Hi, > > > > is there an application to load balance web traffic using multicast > > on freebsd ? > > > > We have web servers currently running NLB (network load balancing) on > > windows 2003 that works this way (simplified for clarity): > > > > We have server A that listen on ip 10.10.10.11 > > We have server A that listen on ip 10.10.10.12 > > > > Both server also listen to "virtual ip" 10.10.10.10. That ip is in > > fact a multicast ip so that a request going to that ip is received by > > both server. Windows load balancing then decide which of the 2 > > machines process the request. It also adapts itself if a server is > > added or removed from the cluster (manually or on a failure) > > > > I saw there is a way with freebsd to add a machine in front of the > > cluster that will direct the traffic and load balance the traffic > > between a group of computers, but I'm looking for a solution similar > > to windows load balancing that doesnt require a dedicated machine in > > front of the cluster. > > > > If someone knows of an app that could do that, I would appreciate if > > you could give me a url for the software in question... > > > > Please don't mention solutions that require the use of a dedicated > > machine in front of the cluster. If there is no way to do this on > > freebsd, I will simply use a cisco load balancer in front of my freebsd >servers > > > > Thanks a lot > > > >Please see CARP: >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/net/ucarp/pkg-descr > >I think this might be what you are looking for. > >Best, Jon > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 20:11:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A476E16A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:11:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AED343D55 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:11:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 82612 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2005 07:11:50 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 82585, pid: 82594, t: 1.5098s scanners: clamav: 0.86.1/m:33/d:984 spam: 3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.33?) (213.202.141.158) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Nov 2005 07:11:48 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2C30EF15-E165-4749-BA92-1C091D7D57F9@redry.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: questions@freebsd.org From: eoghan Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:11:44 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: Subject: xorg.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:11:53 -0000 Hello Im trying to find my xorg.conf :) Ive looked in: /usr/X11R6/ /usr/X11R6/etc/X11/ /etc/X11 (which is empty) Im using kde 3.4.3 with freeBSD-5.4. I realise it could be called XF86Config but I cant locate that either... Any clues? Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 20:30:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774E716A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:30:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2757543D49 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 18632 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 20:30:04 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Nov 2005 20:30:04 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2EF9E28441; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:30:03 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: eoghan To: questions@freebsd.org References: <2C30EF15-E165-4749-BA92-1C091D7D57F9@redry.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 09 Nov 2005 15:30:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2C30EF15-E165-4749-BA92-1C091D7D57F9@redry.net> Message-ID: <4464r1fttg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: xorg.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:30:05 -0000 eoghan writes: > Im trying to find my xorg.conf :) > Ive looked in: > /usr/X11R6/ > /usr/X11R6/etc/X11/ > /etc/X11 (which is empty) > Im using kde 3.4.3 with freeBSD-5.4. > I realise it could be called XF86Config but I cant locate that either... > Any clues? It isn't actually required to have one. Check the log file (probably /var/log/Xorg.0.log), and see what *it* thinks it's using. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 20:31:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0C816A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:31:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from data2@cablespeed.com) Received: from admin.cablespeed.com (admin.cablespeed.com [216.15.205.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8A143D67 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:31:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from data2@cablespeed.com) Received: from [24.56.220.5] (HELO mdm246a3e4f6fc) by admin.cablespeed.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 59826763; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:31:05 -0600 Message-ID: <07a901c5e56c$bdf054c0$05dc3818@mdm246a3e4f6fc> From: "Jon Krause" To: , "Ian Lord" References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109122614.0466c9a8@pop.msdi.ca> <06e801c5e556$7971daa0$05dc3818@mdm246a3e4f6fc> <6.2.3.4.2.20051109131857.04659908@pop.msdi.ca> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:32:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Subject: Re: Web Balancing with multicast X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:31:09 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: Ian Lord To: Jon Krause ; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 2:57 PM Subject: Re: Web Balancing with multicast Thanks for the hint, but this is an active/passive software so only one host can answer request while others wait to see if they need to become master (because master has failed) At 12:53 2005-11-09, Jon Krause wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Lord" Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:37 PM Subject: Web Balancing with multicast > Hi, > > is there an application to load balance web traffic using multicast > on freebsd ? > > We have web servers currently running NLB (network load balancing) on > windows 2003 that works this way (simplified for clarity): > > We have server A that listen on ip 10.10.10.11 > We have server A that listen on ip 10.10.10.12 > > Both server also listen to "virtual ip" 10.10.10.10. That ip is in > fact a multicast ip so that a request going to that ip is received by > both server. Windows load balancing then decide which of the 2 > machines process the request. It also adapts itself if a server is > added or removed from the cluster (manually or on a failure) > > I saw there is a way with freebsd to add a machine in front of the > cluster that will direct the traffic and load balance the traffic > between a group of computers, but I'm looking for a solution similar > to windows load balancing that doesnt require a dedicated machine in > front of the cluster. > > If someone knows of an app that could do that, I would appreciate if > you could give me a url for the software in question... > > Please don't mention solutions that require the use of a dedicated > machine in front of the cluster. If there is no way to do this on > freebsd, I will simply use a cisco load balancer in front of my freebsd servers > > Thanks a lot > Please see CARP: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/net/ucarp/pkg-descr I think this might be what you are looking for. Best, Jon ################## How about Heartbeat?: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/sysutils/heartbeat/pkg-descr Jon _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 20:43:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1437316A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:43:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2132643D62 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:43:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 5281 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2005 07:43:16 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 5226, pid: 5237, t: 3.3306s scanners: clamav: 0.86.1/m:33/d:984 spam: 3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.33?) (213.202.141.158) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Nov 2005 07:43:13 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <4464r1fttg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <2C30EF15-E165-4749-BA92-1C091D7D57F9@redry.net> <4464r1fttg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9408029D-B337-40A8-BF86-855D11A3A097@redry.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:43:09 +0000 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: Subject: Re: xorg.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:43:22 -0000 On 9 Nov 2005, at 20:30, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > eoghan writes: > >> Im trying to find my xorg.conf :) >> Ive looked in: >> /usr/X11R6/ >> /usr/X11R6/etc/X11/ >> /etc/X11 (which is empty) >> Im using kde 3.4.3 with freeBSD-5.4. >> I realise it could be called XF86Config but I cant locate that >> either... >> Any clues? > > It isn't actually required to have one. > Check the log file (probably /var/log/Xorg.0.log), > and see what *it* thinks it's using. Thanks... Ive created it now and modified to my needs. Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 20:45:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245FD16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:45:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Keith.Owen@sonoma.dds.ca.gov) Received: from sonoma.dds.ca.gov (webmail.sonoma.dds.ca.gov [158.96.246.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30AA43D76 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:45:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Keith.Owen@sonoma.dds.ca.gov) Received: from SDCGwia-MTA by sonoma.dds.ca.gov with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:45:42 -0800 Message-Id: <4371EF5C.ED9B.00D8.0@sonoma.dds.ca.gov> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0 Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:45:16 -0800 From: "Keith Owen" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Application Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:45:58 -0000 I was wanting to know when Vmware 5.0 workstation will be in the ports tree= , or if there is a way to install the boxed version. = Thanks, Keith Owen ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: = This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the = intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged informati= on. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. = If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply = e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 20:52:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC6516A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE48443D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so226808nzo for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:52:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=atzLeShOPR7t7WtiwfAYVK7DGoARuzOw4HuDsTPhaCqZKd/z9KM6Gg2CDfc9QyL+hbsMhIXEpkwLX4BslPPIX0TZ9gEGWTWGLFAgjhoH0Bb8WaVWlYMkg6/hQL56UcMBhn1q8pggOiGgzOjqe2jVQY/Z2ROfadbQOxxGLXN6lyM= Received: by 10.36.251.38 with SMTP id y38mr19668nzh; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:52:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:52:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:52:19 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: =?KOI8-R?B?7cHL08nNIOfPzNXOz9c=?= In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <44irvcayyr.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: NFS ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:52:20 -0000 T24gMTEvOS8wNSwg7cHL08nNIOfPzNXOz9cgPG1nb2x1bm92QGxpc3QucnU+IHdyb3RlOgo+IEhl bGxvIGZyaWVuZHMuIEhvdyBkbyB5b3UgZG8/Cj4gMSkgSSd2ZSBnb3QgYW55IHByb2JsZW1zIHdp dGggbWFjLWJpYmEgYW5kIG1hYy1tbHMuCj4gSSB1c2VkIG9ubHkgbWFjLWJpYmEgYW5kIG1hYy1t bHMgZnJvbSBmYW1pbHkgb2YgbWFjLXBvbGljeS4KPiBJIHdhbnQgdG8gc2V0IHVwIE5GUy4gQW5k IEkgY291bGQgZG8gaXQsIHJlYWxseSwgSSBuZWVkZWQgc3dpdGNoIG9mZiBtYWMtcG9saWN5IG9u IE5GUy1zZXJ2ZXIuIFdoZW4gSSB1c2UgbWFjLXBvbGljeSBvbiBORlMtc2VydmVyLCBORlMtY2xp ZW50IHJlcG9ydGVkICJSUENQUk9HLU5GUzogcG9ydHMgbWFwIGZhaWx1cmUuLi46IHRpbWUgb3V0 IiBhZnRlciBjb21tYW5kICJtb3VudF9uZnMuLi4iLiBJJ20gcmVwZWF0aW5nLCBpZiBzd2l0Y2gg b2ZmIG1hYy1wb2xpY3kgb24gTkZTLXNlcnZlciwgdGhlbiBORlMgZ29vZCB3b3JrLgo+IEhvdyB3 aWxsIEkgbmVlZCB0byBjaGFuZ2Ugc2V0dGluZ3MgdG8gZ29vZCB3b3JrIE5GUz8KPgo+IDIpIFRo ZSBmaXJtICx3aGVuIEkgd29yaywgZG93bmxvYWRlZCBhbGwgcGFja2FnZXMgZnJvbSBmdHAuZnJl ZWJzZC5vcmcgKDExR2IpLiBNeSB0YXNrIGlzIHRvIHBsYWNlIGFsbCBwYWNrYWdlcyBpbiBORlMt c2VydmVyLiBXaGVuIE5GUy1jbGllbnQgaXMgdHJ5aW5nIHRvIG9wZW4gTkZTLWRpcmVjdG9yeSB3 aXRoIGFsbCBwYWNrYWdlcywgaXQgcmVwb3J0ZWQgInNlcnZlcjovLi4uIGlzIG5vdCByZXNwb25k aW5nIi4gSSdtIHN1cmUsIHRoaXMgbWlzdGFrZSBpcyBzaG93biBiZWNhdXNlIHRoZSBkaXJlY3Rv cnkgaGFzIGdvdCBtYW55IGZpbGVzLiBJZiBhIGRpcmVjdG9yeSBoYXMgZ290IHNvbWUgZmlsZXMs IE5GUy1jbGllbnQgaXMgb3BlbmluZyB0aGlzIGRpcmVjdG9yeS4KPiBIb3cgd2lsbCBJIG5lZWQg dG8gY2hhbmdlIHNldHRpbmdzIHRvIGNvcnJlY3Qgd29yayBORlM/Cj4KPiAzKSBUaGUgbmV4dCBw cm9ibGVtIGlzIGhvdyBjYW4gd3JpdGUgaW4gZGlyZWN0b3JpZXMgb24gTkZTLXNlcnZlci4gSSBy ZWFkIHRoYXQgcm9vdCBmcm9tIE5GUy1jbGllbnQgY2FuIHdyaXRlIGluIGRpcmVjdG9yaWVzIG9u IE5GUy1zZXJ2ZXIgYnkgZGVmYXVsdC4gSSB3YXMgdHJ5aW5nIGFuZCBJIHdyb3RlIHNvbWUgc21h bGwgZmlsZXMgaW4gTkZTLXNlcnZlciwgYnV0IHdoZW4gSSB3YXMgd3JpdGluZyBmaWxlIHdpdGgg c2l6ZSBtb3JlIDEgTWIsIE5GUy1jbGllbnQgd2FzIGJyb2tlbi4gSSBtdXN0IHdhcyByZWJvb3Rp bmcgYSBtYWNoaW5lLgo+IEhvdyB3aWxsIEkgbmVlZCB0byBjaGFuZ2Ugc2V0dGluZ3MgdG8gY2Fu IHdyaXRlIGluIGRpcmVjdG9yaWVzIG9uIE5GUy1zZXJ2ZXI/Cj4KPiBXaGl0IHRoZSBiZXN0IHJl Z2FyZHMgZnJvbSBNQVguCj4KCvDP1sHM1crT1MEsINDSz97J1MHKINrExdPYLCDLwcsg0NLB18nM 2M7PIM7B09TSwcnXwdTYIE5GUzoKCmh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcvZG9jL2VuX1VTLklT Tzg4NTktMS9ib29rcy9oYW5kYm9vay9uZXR3b3JrLW5mcy5odG1sCgr+1M/C2SDV08vP0snU2CDE z9PU1dAgyyDQwdDLwc0g0yDCz8zY28nNIMvPzMnexdPU18/NCsbByszP1ywgydPQz8zY2tXKIM/Q w8nAIG5vYXRpbWUgKNDPxNLPws7FxSAtINcgzcHO0MHHxQptb3VudCg4KSkuCgrpIM7B3s7JLCDO wcvPzsXDLCDJ09DPzNjaz9fB1Nggzs/SzcHM2M7ZyiDQz97Uz9fZygrLzMnFztQuIOXTzMkgzsUg 09XE2MLBIM/T18/J1NggbXV0dCwg0M/M2NrVytPRIMjP1NEKwtkgZ21haWwgySDExczJINPU0s/e y8kgbmV3bGluZSfBzckg19LV3s7VwC4K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 21:15:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D2A16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:15:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cstdenis@voicio.com) Received: from swordfish.dnsvelocity.com (swordfish.dnsvelocity.com [209.123.180.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6AE43D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:15:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cstdenis@voicio.com) Received: from s0106000f660223be.vc.shawcable.net ([24.83.99.55] helo=chris) by swordfish.dnsvelocity.com with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EZx7Y-0003dH-Ij for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:04:40 +0000 Message-ID: <002d01c5e572$b734cb10$6501a8c0@chris> From: "Cstdenis" To: Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:15:28 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - swordfish.dnsvelocity.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - voicio.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Error with /sbin/sha256 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:15:39 -0000 When I try to compile ports I get nausicaa# make =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for php5-pear-5.0.5 =3D> MD5 Checksum OK for php-5.0.5.tar.bz2. /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /sbin/sha256: Undefined symbol "SHA256_Init" *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/php5-pear. This just started happening for no appearent reason. Only appears to = affect /sbin/sha256. I tried updating and remaking the world to fix this = but it did not help any (only source changes were the openSSL updates).=20 nausicaa# uname -a FreeBSD nausicaa.ctgameinfo.com 5.4-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p7 = #0: Sat Oct 8 19:34:10 PDT 2005 = root@216-55-169-166.dedicated.abac.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SERVER i386 Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 21:16:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382EA16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:16:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard2.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52A643D60 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:16:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 67592 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2005 21:17:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2005 21:17:37 -0000 Message-ID: <43726778.304@123.com.sv> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:17:44 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 6.0 install problems in HP DL380 Array 5i X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:16:50 -0000 Hi, im having some problems when installing freebsd 6.0 in a DL380 with smart array 5i controller, i have a RAID 1 using two 36G disks, i can create the slide and partition without problems, when sysinstall is installing the doc part, this messages suddently appear in screen: Write failure on transfer ! (Wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes), after pressing the ok button, this appears: Unable to transfer the doc distribution from acd0 acd0 is the cdrom, according to dmesg: acd0: CDROM at at0-master PIO4 i did check the media and it is ok: shiva1 var # md5sum -c CHECKSUM.MD5 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso: OK 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso: OK I dont know if this is related to my other post about the hang on boot, you can read it here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&m=113147447325120&w=2 I decided to try a ftp install, sysinstall finished without any problem. Now when im rebooting the server, it hangs for about 2 minutes, exactly at this line: [...dmesg output...] Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4 da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 135.168MB/s transfers da0: 34727MB (71122560 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 8716C) After the 2 minutes hang, the server booted in the "normal" way, i dont see any error messages.This also happened when i was trying to install with the cd, sysinstall started after the 2 minutes delay but i got the error described above. This make nervous about some conflict or potential problem with the hardisk or cdrom or even the array controllers somewhere, i dont have any clue about what could be my problem, and i have to have running in production this server by the weekend, any hints? --- Miguel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 21:52:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2439416A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:52:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C299743D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:52:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (pool-71-109-244-179.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.244.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA9LqVbS008800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:52:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) In-Reply-To: <436F0BE8.5080309@xs4all.nl> References: <436EF109.2010706@xs4all.nl> <245F198F-4E74-48F4-9DC2-550B7AFEAA3E@lafn.org> <436F0BE8.5080309@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Hardie Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:52:30 -0800 To: Hans Nieser X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1166/Mon Nov 7 11:01:45 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade from 5.3 to 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 21:52:37 -0000 On Nov 7, 2005, at 00:10, Hans Nieser wrote: > Doug Hardie wrote: >> On Nov 6, 2005, at 22:15, Hans Nieser wrote: >>> Doug Hardie wrote: > >>>> I am in the midst of upgrading via source from 5.3 to 6.0. All >>>> is going fine, but the instructions in UPDATING do not include >>>> a make installkernel command. I know that needs to be done >>>> somewhere. I suspect between the buildkernel and the reboot. > >>> I think it says "make kernel ...", which apparently does both > >> I see that now. But, then how do you build multiple kernels? I >> maintain all source on one system and build all the kernels >> there. I don't want to install them as they won't work. Also, I >> don't want to build them on the production machines, just install >> them. > > I think you can still use the buildkernel and installkernel targets > for that purpose, they are still mentioned in the Makefile at least. I verified that is correct. Thanks. I was able to build multiple kernels successfully without having to install them all. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:02:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D441C16A420 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:02:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@henriklidstrom.se) Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3EA43D53 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:02:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@henriklidstrom.se) Received: from mailgw.henriklidstrom.se ([213.113.168.75] [213.113.168.75]) by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20051109220225.BRZP9142.mxfep02.bredband.com@mailgw.henriklidstrom.se>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:02:25 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.henriklidstrom.se [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw.henriklidstrom.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E02BA60; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:02:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailgw.henriklidstrom.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgw.henriklidstrom.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84957-09; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:02:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from henkezan (henkezan.henriklidstrom.se [192.168.0.2]) by mailgw.henriklidstrom.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87430BA5E; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:02:19 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Henrik_Lidstr=F6m?= To: "'Miguel'" , Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:02:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.181 Thread-Index: AcXlcw15f+xpG2QKQ5y9slnbQiFdJQABa3sQ In-Reply-To: <43726778.304@123.com.sv> Message-Id: <20051109220219.87430BA5E@mailgw.henriklidstrom.se> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at henriklidstrom.se Cc: Subject: SV: 6.0 install problems in HP DL380 Array 5i X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:02:31 -0000 > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Fr=E5n: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] F=F6r Miguel > Skickat: den 9 november 2005 22:18 > Till: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > =C4mne: 6.0 install problems in HP DL380 Array 5i >=20 > Hi, im having some problems when installing freebsd 6.0 in a=20 > DL380 with smart array 5i controller, i have a RAID 1 using=20 > two 36G disks, i can create the slide and partition without=20 > problems, when sysinstall is installing the doc part, this=20 > messages suddently appear in screen: >=20 > Write failure on transfer ! (Wrote -1 bytes of 1425408=20 > bytes), after pressing the ok button, this appears: >=20 > Unable to transfer the doc distribution from acd0 >=20 > acd0 is the cdrom, according to dmesg: >=20 > acd0: CDROM at at0-master PIO4 >=20 > i did check the media and it is ok: >=20 > shiva1 var # md5sum -c CHECKSUM.MD5 > 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso: OK > 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso: OK >=20 > I dont know if this is related to my other post about the=20 > hang on boot, you can read it here: >=20 > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dfreebsd-questions&m=3D1131474473 > 25120&w=3D2 >=20 > I decided to try a ftp install, sysinstall finished without=20 > any problem. > Now when im rebooting the server, it hangs for about 2=20 > minutes, exactly at this line: >=20 > [...dmesg output...] > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4=20 > da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da0: 135.168MB/s transfers > da0: 34727MB (71122560 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 8716C) >=20 > After the 2 minutes hang, the server booted in the "normal"=20 > way, i dont see any error messages.This also happened when i=20 > was trying to install with the cd, sysinstall started after=20 > the 2 minutes delay but i got the error described above. This=20 > make nervous about some conflict or potential problem with=20 > the hardisk or cdrom or even the array controllers somewhere,=20 > i dont have any clue about what could be my problem, and i=20 > have to have running in production this server by the=20 > weekend, any hints? >=20 > --- > Miguel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 Yes, I recently upgraded an ML350 with a SA-641 card to 6.0-RC1.=20 That one too stalls at boot at the same place.=20 Not 2 minutes, but like 45 seconds. No problem installing via cd though. /Henrik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:15:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6B816A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:15:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.brisbin@npcinternational.com) Received: from mail1.npci.com (mail.npcinternational.com [63.76.154.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF9F43D53 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:15:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.brisbin@npcinternational.com) Received: from 7tj8h41 ([172.16.10.93]) by mail1.npci.com (MOS 3.5.9-GR) with ESMTP id BZB03269 (AUTH via LOGINBEFORESMTP); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:09:59 -0600 (CST) From: "Jon Brisbin" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:16:31 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <437220DF.4127.12A8DB0@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: CPU affinity in new ULE scheduler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:15:43 -0000 I can't find any information on how to set the CPU affinity for processes in the FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler. On the linux box, which we're moving from, I have dual Xeon HTT's that I have JBoss scheduled round-robin with the CPU affinity set to the first two processors, nice -15. I have Postgres scheduled SCHED_FIFO on the last two processors, nice -15. This gives me the greatest bandwidth possible in our scenario as it eliminates the CPU contention I had noticed before doing it this way. How do I do the same thing in FreeBSD? I have found a lot of information that talks about setting CPU affinity, but I have yet to find one example of how to do this. On linux, I'm using a CK-patched kernel and "schedtool" Is there something similar on FreeBSD? Thanks! Jon Brisbin Webmaster NPC International, Inc. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:20:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A0316A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:20:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from livewire@echotrace.com) Received: from mighty.strongsite.net (mighty.strongsite.net [70.85.42.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDC443D7E for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:19:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from livewire@echotrace.com) Received: from 24-107-12-112.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com ([24.107.12.112] helo=[192.168.1.101]) by mighty.strongsite.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52) id 1EZyIF-0007H5-Tq for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:19:48 -0600 Message-ID: <4372767E.6010400@echotrace.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:21:50 -0600 From: Live-Wire User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - mighty.strongsite.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - echotrace.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: ifconfig mystery card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:20:02 -0000 Hi, I'm configuring an old network card in a 5.4 install, and I have no idea what it is (got it from a friend, no documentation or labels, etc.) running ifconfig I see (besides my localhost lo0 entry): x10: flags=8802 mtu 1500 options=9 ether 00:01:03:20:d5:fd media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier and yet, running ifconfig x10 i get "ifconfig: interface x10 does not exist" Hmm ... what am I missing? - JK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:25:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3465D16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:25:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33E543D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:25:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s18so269991nze for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:25:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=ldGx0s5Ih9/Z0KzhnYc1KaA3B0CYpXHUdCNjb985dJdXcyAh8DjCpwN0y2O+IaQY2nkkb7xg0gtljoKhX2KQDaXCxpvu6LP7oQW7sL2hNH1BGWJpvlXrrYcJKGoCQbDSbp8SMTKbhI/nrUPE+0iTdbr+bAIsEDO8braYRsAKAZ8= Received: by 10.64.210.1 with SMTP id i1mr1277089qbg; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:19:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m3sm1034979qbe.2005.11.09.12.19.21; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:19:24 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:10:43 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <2C30EF15-E165-4749-BA92-1C091D7D57F9@redry.net> In-Reply-To: <2C30EF15-E165-4749-BA92-1C091D7D57F9@redry.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511091210.45166.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, eoghan Subject: Re: xorg.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:25:04 -0000 On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:11, eoghan wrote: > Hello > Im trying to find my xorg.conf :) > Ive looked in: > /usr/X11R6/ > /usr/X11R6/etc/X11/ > /etc/X11 (which is empty) > Im using kde 3.4.3 with freeBSD-5.4. > I realise it could be called XF86Config but I cant locate that either... > Any clues? > Thanks > Eoghan /etc/X11 is the right place, but it may be empty if X is usinbg its default values. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:27:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A99116A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:27:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA12443D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:27:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so227232wra for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:27:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=ldGx0s5Ih9/Z0KzhnYc1KaA3B0CYpXHUdCNjb985dJdXcyAh8DjCpwN0y2O+IaQY2nkkb7xg0gtljoKhX2KQDaXCxpvu6LP7oQW7sL2hNH1BGWJpvlXrrYcJKGoCQbDSbp8SMTKbhI/nrUPE+0iTdbr+bAIsEDO8braYRsAKAZ8= Received: by 10.64.210.1 with SMTP id i1mr1277089qbg; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:19:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m3sm1034979qbe.2005.11.09.12.19.21; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:19:24 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:10:43 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <2C30EF15-E165-4749-BA92-1C091D7D57F9@redry.net> In-Reply-To: <2C30EF15-E165-4749-BA92-1C091D7D57F9@redry.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511091210.45166.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, eoghan Subject: Re: xorg.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:27:29 -0000 On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:11, eoghan wrote: > Hello > Im trying to find my xorg.conf :) > Ive looked in: > /usr/X11R6/ > /usr/X11R6/etc/X11/ > /etc/X11 (which is empty) > Im using kde 3.4.3 with freeBSD-5.4. > I realise it could be called XF86Config but I cant locate that either... > Any clues? > Thanks > Eoghan /etc/X11 is the right place, but it may be empty if X is usinbg its default values. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:27:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2CA16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:27:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBF643D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:27:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jA9MRn38021131; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:27:49 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id jA9MRnj2021130; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:27:49 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200511092227.jA9MRnj2021130@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: livewire@echotrace.com (Live-Wire) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:27:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4372767E.6010400@echotrace.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ifconfig mystery card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:27:53 -0000 > > Hi, > > I'm configuring an old network card in a 5.4 install, and I have no idea > what it is (got it from a friend, no documentation or labels, etc.) > > running ifconfig I see (besides my localhost lo0 entry): > > x10: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > options=9 > ether 00:01:03:20:d5:fd > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier > > and yet, running ifconfig x10 i get > > "ifconfig: interface x10 does not exist" > > Hmm ... what am I missing? Any chance that there is a confusion between a letter 'l' and numeral '1' in the name? ////jerry > > - JK > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:38:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7786416A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:38:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B7F43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:38:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m22so251538nzf for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:38:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=QGwaTakS3cJa3Aq2NUpMANIMguqNZSFVuPTxwYFAtkEtwRFSmO4mSuHdTrid7ktN4eJlA70lUz4pEStgDNp3JqeiA9VhLhgILjJ0gVTIwkunaYq/i2lQY4fg1L7/boy+UA2szAliW3wt0cOz3u7dfh6/OM+/Dq8Ec/E5qpCtLXs= Received: by 10.64.209.17 with SMTP id h17mr1014864qbg; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:10:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q14sm792030qbq.2005.11.09.09.10.34; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:10:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:01:58 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511090901.58637.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: "Brian E. Conklin" Subject: Re: cvsup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:38:42 -0000 On Wednesday 09 November 2005 08:59, Brian E. Conklin wrote: > Hello All, > I'm having a problem with cvsup on two of my machines. > Both cvsup jobs were giving me errors saying "TreeList failed: > Network write failure: Connection closed". I googled this and found an > entry saying that something went awry in the checkout files. SO I deleted > the /var/db/sup directory as recommended by that posting. Now I am getting > a new error. When running "/usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L 2 -h > cvsup10.us.freebsd.org /etc/ports-supfile" I get the following output: > > Parsing supfile "/etc/ports-supfile" > Connecting to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org > Connected to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org > Server software version: SNAP_16_1h > Negotiating file attribute support > Exchanging collection information > Establishing multiplexed-mode data connection > Running > Detailer failed: Network write failure: Connection closed > Will retry at 08:54:05 > > It doesn't matter what server I connect to, I get the same error. I only get that error with cvsup10.us.freebsd.org, double check your sup file. -Mike > > uname -a reports: > FreeBSD netmon1.masongeneral.com 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Sun > May 8 10:21:06 UTC 2005 > root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > Thanks in advance for any ideas and help. > > Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE > Director of Information Services > Mason General Hospital > =================================== > > Mason General Hospital > 901 Mt. View Drive > PO Box 1668 > Shelton, WA 98584 > http://www.masongeneral.com > (360) 426-1611 > =================================== > > This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity > to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you > are not the addressee nor authorized to receive for the addressee, you > are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute > to anyone this message or any information contained in the message. If > you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the > sender and delete the message. > > Replying to this message constitutes consent to electronic monitoring > of this message. > > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:42:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D2216A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:42:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D579D43D75 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:42:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FF55F7E; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:42:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92162-04; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:42:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29D85C21; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:42:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4372767E.6010400@echotrace.com> References: <4372767E.6010400@echotrace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:42:36 -0500 To: Live-Wire X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ifconfig mystery card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:42:44 -0000 On Nov 9, 2005, at 5:21 PM, Live-Wire wrote: > running ifconfig I see (besides my localhost lo0 entry): > > x10: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > options=9 > ether 00:01:03:20:d5:fd > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier > > and yet, running ifconfig x10 i get > > "ifconfig: interface x10 does not exist" That's almost certainly "xl0", spelled "Xray Lima", which is a 3com 9xx NIC. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:44:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FF416A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:44:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willmaier@ml1.net) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0436F43D53 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:43:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willmaier@ml1.net) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80704CDAEBC for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:43:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:43:47 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: OAz/qM0CEZ3KNTaxgC9QXTPIMCZydv9LvssQGZ6bmlz0 1131576224 Received: from merkur (host-66-202-74-42.choiceone.net [66.202.74.42]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846B55703B5 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:43:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by merkur (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) willmaier@ml1.net; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:43:50 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:43:49 -0600 From: Will Maier To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051109224349.GH28298@localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4372767E.6010400@echotrace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4372767E.6010400@echotrace.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Subject: Re: ifconfig mystery card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:44:01 -0000 On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:21:50PM -0600, Live-Wire wrote: > running ifconfig I see (besides my localhost lo0 entry): > > x10: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > options=9 > ether 00:01:03:20:d5:fd > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier Did you copy and paste this from a terminal? (I don't think you did...) > and yet, running ifconfig x10 i get > > "ifconfig: interface x10 does not exist" I think you've misinterpreted the 'l' in 'xl0' as an '1'. | ~ % man -k '^xl' | xl(4) - 3Com Etherlink XL and Fast Etherlink XL Ethernet device driver | ~ % man -k '^x1' | ^x1: nothing appropriate | ~ % That should also give you a hint as to the type of card you have (a rather common one, at that). > Hmm ... what am I missing? ; ) -- o--------------------------{ Will Maier }--------------------------o | jabber:..wcmaier@jabber.ccc.de | email:..........wcmaier@ml1.net | | \.........wcmaier@cae.wisc.edu | \..........wcmaier@cae.wisc.edu | *------------------[ BSD Unix: Live Free or Die ]------------------* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:47:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE8716A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:47:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from bristolsystems.com (h-68-167-239-98.lsanca54.covad.net [68.167.239.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E084043D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:47:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from workdog ([192.168.1.201]) by bristolsystems.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jA9MlYn22051 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:47:34 -0800 From: "Gayn Winters" To: Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:47:24 -0800 Message-ID: <025501c5e57f$90b0f290$c901a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal Subject: Masquerading Virtual domains in sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:47:35 -0000 I'm installing sendmail.8.13.3 on FBSD 5.4 on node.domain1.com. I've configured /etc/mail/local-host-names to accept mail for domain1.com and domain2.com. My user names look like bob.domain1.com and (a different Bob) bob.domain2.com. Inside /etc/mail/virtusertable I map bob@domain1.com bob.domain1.com bob@domain2.com bob.domain2.com Inbound all is well. BUT, What I can't figure out is how to masquerade mail from bob.domain1.com as being from bob@domain1.com AND ALSO HAVE bob.domain2.com masqueraded as being from bob@domain2.com. One test of this working is to be able to register both Bob's in the FreeBSD mailing lists as bob@domain1.com and bob@domain2.com. Ideas? References? Thanks, -gayn Bristol Systems Inc. 714/532-6776 www.bristolsystems.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:56:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC9016A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:56:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcin@studio4plus.com) Received: from pe78.opole.sdi.tpnet.pl (pe78.opole.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.240.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575EA43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:56:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcin@studio4plus.com) Received: from [81.219.217.131] (helo=[192.168.0.101]) by pe78.opole.sdi.tpnet.pl with esmtpa (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1EZyrM-0006in-7I for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:56:04 +0100 Message-ID: <43727E7D.30905@studio4plus.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:55:57 +0100 From: Marcin Simonides User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051029) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: VIA RAID geometry and other problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:56:05 -0000 I've recently arranged two of my disks into a RAID0 array using my on-board VIA SATA controller, installed XP on it and prepared first partition for /usr to be disklabeled and used later. Here's the partition table as I remember it :) : primary ar0s1 FreeBSD unused (20GB) primary ar0s2 NTFS Windows XP (20GB) extended partition: logical ar0s5 NTFS some data (60GB) logical ar0s6(?) FAT32 some data (32GB) the rest was unused. The first thing I've noticed was the wrong size of the corresponding ar0 device [dmesg output]: atapci0: port 0xec00-0xec07,0xe800-0xe803,0xe400-0xe407,0xe000-0xe003,0xdc00-0xdc0f,0xd800-0xd8ff irq 20 at device 15.0 on pci0 [...] ad0: 29314MB at ata0-master UDMA100 ad4: 76319MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 76319MB at ata3-master SATA150 ar0: 76319MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY using ad4 at ata2-master ar0: disk1 READY using ad6 at ata3-master Geometry shown in sysinstall is the same for ar0 as for ad0. I don't know if this is a problem or not. The size of ar0 which should be the sum of ad4 and ad6, however, is a problem when using disk utilities. The other interesting thing is status returned by atacontrol: simon# atacontrol status ar0 ar0: ATA RAID0 stripesize=32 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: READY The stripe size was set to 16KB while creating array in BIOS. Does atacontrol show size in KB or some other unit (blocks?). I guess it's all right, since I can read data written with Windows driver. I've used Windows' disk management to partition the array and there were no problems except for one: the FAT32 slice was not present in FreeBSD. data on ar0s5 was accessible, I think it extended past 76319MB, which is the size that ar0 reports. Real problems started after I disklabeled ar0s1 for /usr and additional swap. They both work as expected, but the whole extended partition has disappeared (I used sysinstall to do the disklabel, not the first time and I think I did it right). I've tried creating extended partition again (in windows) in hope that logical drives and data are still there, but this didn't help. Then I tried gpart, it complained about a problem with extended partition at sector where it should begin. It showed the first two slices where they are. Then I tried creating extended and primary partition with sysinstall, linux-fdisk and at some point Windows stopped booting (everything I tried to create was behind the second slice, but maybe I did something wrong). Fortunately the contents of these lost slices is not very important (it shouldn't take more than a day to recreate), so I don't need to fix it. Does anybody know why this may have happened and what can I do to have ar0 report proper size and access all slices? Could this be an issue with FreeBSD ata raid driver (I found posts by people using VIA 6420 and RAID1, does anyone use it for RAID0?) ? Thanks for reading this long message ;) -- Marcin Simonides From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 22:56:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C98A16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:56:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net (smtp1.suscom.net [64.78.119.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAE643D46 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:56:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6A3D827A for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:56:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp1.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13101-06 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:56:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp1.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 179E0D827B for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:56:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jA9MueTZ026452 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:56:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (ges@localhost) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jA9MuefG026449 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:56:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) X-Authentication-Warning: seibercom.net: ges owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:56:40 -0500 (EST) From: Gerard Seibert To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20051109175132.X20375@seibercom.net> Organization: Seibercom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new .250 at suscom.net Subject: New boot-up message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerard Seibert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:56:49 -0000 I just recently updated KDE. Upon boot-up, this message now appears: Updating KDM configuration Information: reading old kdmrc /usr/local/share/config/kdm/kdmrc (from kde >= 2.2.x) Information: old kdmrc is from kde >= 3.1 (config version 2.3) This appears every time I boot-up. Since I do not believe this to be normal, how should I go about correcting it? Thanks! -- Gerard gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 23:03:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB75A16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luktheluckyboy@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEAE43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luktheluckyboy@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l8so286023nzf for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:03:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EHs4F0lpRJ4S8y5mv6RG6jgPPqWA9rWpj1S5Ku79THJmDEKl6HSHeADIXcvFbjVbjBtt2jMcqrUCaOX42cFx/sYmraoQarCcL4Ic4G2OvBNPZlkNTO4+DKXkmyMPOpiM+PI1EdQmefST+2FScVG2PX1hX7CjqDVKwtJV3+T9u/w= Received: by 10.65.113.6 with SMTP id q6mr727242qbm; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:43:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.96.18 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:43:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7b1df2440511090443y28d4b535g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:43:37 +0100 From: Luk van den Borne To: Blake Darche In-Reply-To: <287fd0790511082103g6164c2d9j4ad53ef4470ba900@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <287fd0790511082103g6164c2d9j4ad53ef4470ba900@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce4-desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:03:13 -0000 That's not something specific to this port. It happened to me before. A quickfix is to hit alt+F2 and run xfdesktop. Remember to save the session when you logout. 2005/11/9, Blake Darche : > I think xfce4-desktop port is broken. I updated my ports tree earlier > tonight and did a portupgrade tonight and it broke. It worked earlier > today... It appears some xfce4 ports have gone to 4.3.2.1 and some > have not: > > user123@kilo$ pkg_info | grep xfce > gtk-xfce-engine-2.2.8 An XFCE engine for GTK 2.0 > libxfce4gui-4.2.3 XFce 4 widget library required by xfce4 and xfwm4 > libxfce4mcs-4.2.3 XFce 4 settings management library used by most XFce = 4 modu > libxfce4util-4.2.3.1 XFce 4 library with non-graphical helper functions > xfce-4.2.3.1 The "meta-port" for the XFce 4 desktop environment > xfce4-appfinder-4.2.3 Find application in the system supporting > Desktop entry for > xfce4-desktop-4.2.3 XFce 4 desktop background manager and root menu > xfce4-fm-4.2.3 XFce 4 file manager > xfce4-icon-theme-4.2.3 Icon themes for XFce 4 > xfce4-iconbox-4.2.3 XFce 4 icon box, an alternative taskbar > xfce4-mcs-manager-4.2.3 XFce 4 settings manager > xfce4-mcs-plugins-4.2.3 XFce 4 settings manager plugins > xfce4-mixer-4.2.3 XFce 4 volume mixer module for xfce4-panel > xfce4-panel-4.2.3 XFce 4 panel module > xfce4-print-4.2.3 XFce 4 graphical frontend for printing > xfce4-session-4.2.3 Session manager for the Xfce 4 desktop environment > xfce4-systray-4.2.3 XFce 4 system tray module for xfce4-panel > xfce4-toys-4.2.3 Toys for the XFce 4 panel > xfce4-trigger-launcher-4.2.3 A command trigger plugin for xfce4-panel > xfce4-utils-4.2.3 XFce 4 essential utilities and scripts > xfce4-wm-4.2.3.1 XFce 4 window manager > > > Anyone got any ideas? xfce still works, just no desktop background, > and no right clicking on the desktop. And of course the X11 standard > screen of grey squares where the desktop picture used to be. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 23:57:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A6C16A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:57:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: from ratchet.nebcorp.com (ratchet.nebcorp.com [205.217.153.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5628B43D48 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:57:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djh@nebcorp.com) Received: by ratchet.nebcorp.com (Postfix, from userid 1014) id 0175DD982E; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:57:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:57:50 -0800 From: Danny Howard To: user Message-ID: <20051109235750.GF72876@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I tell FreeBSD to sync, for real ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:57:51 -0000 On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 04:34:04PM -0500, user wrote: > > Sometimes you delete a large batch of files, or you do some other serious > FS operations and the output of `df` does not tell you immediately of the > new disk space, etc. > > If you run something like: sync > > Or even: sync ; sync user, can you describe a reproducible phenomenon? Did you delete something from /var/log and you're waiting for df to reflect that? This is a common one ... if a process has a filehandle open, and you delete the file, the blocks on disk are not freed until the process closes that filehandle. If this is what's thwarting you, check out lsof. :) Cheers, -danny -- http://dannyman.toldme.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 00:02:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD4E16A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:02:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B9843D4C for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:02:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101681A3C25; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:02:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC62C513A2; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:02:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:02:34 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Keith Owen Message-ID: <20051110000234.GA12619@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4371EF5C.ED9B.00D8.0@sonoma.dds.ca.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4371EF5C.ED9B.00D8.0@sonoma.dds.ca.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Application Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:02:36 -0000 --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:45:16PM -0800, Keith Owen wrote: > I was wanting to know when Vmware 5.0 workstation will be in the ports tr= ee, or if there is a way to install the boxed version.=20 Some time after someone ports it to run on FreeBSD. Kris --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDco4aWry0BWjoQKURArroAJ9yLI9KHOeQvXng1Em6ElRE6FoFCgCfc4aj vdGtqm9gf7uRpiSbFnU0ORQ= =Ch/c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 00:04:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2283816A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:04:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49B343D48 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:04:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949431A3C27; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:04:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BF63513A2; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:04:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:04:43 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Cstdenis Message-ID: <20051110000443.GB12619@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <002d01c5e572$b734cb10$6501a8c0@chris> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8GpibOaaTibBMecb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002d01c5e572$b734cb10$6501a8c0@chris> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error with /sbin/sha256 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:04:47 -0000 --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:15:28PM -0800, Cstdenis wrote: > When I try to compile ports I get >=20 > nausicaa# make > =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for php5-pear-5.0.5 > =3D> MD5 Checksum OK for php-5.0.5.tar.bz2. > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /sbin/sha256: Undefined symbol "SHA256_Init" > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/php5-pear. >=20 >=20 > This just started happening for no appearent reason. Only appears to affe= ct /sbin/sha256. I tried updating and remaking the world to fix this but it= did not help any (only source changes were the openSSL updates).=20 >=20 > nausicaa# uname -a > FreeBSD nausicaa.ctgameinfo.com 5.4-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p7 #0:= Sat Oct 8 19:34:10 PDT 2005 root@216-55-169-166.dedicated.abac.net:/u= sr/obj/usr/src/sys/SERVER i386 >=20 >=20 > Any ideas? AFAIK this binary is not present on 5.4. Did you at some stage run 6.0 on this machine? If so, it was left behind and you should remove it. Kris --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDco6aWry0BWjoQKURAkUjAJ99meeaU2DALmAsujCUbsnLMqG95gCg8w2W /SAXNIqZDU72+8DuxiG85JE= =KsM2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8GpibOaaTibBMecb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 00:05:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEF816A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:05:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6139143D72 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:05:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FA21A3C24; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:05:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29423513A2; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:05:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:05:31 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jon Brisbin Message-ID: <20051110000530.GC12619@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <437220DF.4127.12A8DB0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <437220DF.4127.12A8DB0@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPU affinity in new ULE scheduler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:05:38 -0000 --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:16:31PM -0600, Jon Brisbin wrote: > I can't find any information on how to set the CPU affinity for processes= in the=20 > FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler. That's because you can't. ULE gives lower performance on the workloads I have tested anyway. This may be fixed in the future. Kris --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDco7KWry0BWjoQKURAhYOAKCjY/NPLA2Qu5jrxeReprR/uFQXGQCg7soV yhjy8JKFRrz8lo0EsZ5mehc= =miN9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 00:08:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC8116A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (ntweb04.msdihosting.net [66.199.153.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F10443D49 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:08:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([24.201.183.241]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id B3Q02104; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:08:41 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109190705.048069a0@pop.msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:08:12 -0500 To: Kris Kennaway From: Ian Lord In-Reply-To: <20051110000530.GC12619@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <437220DF.4127.12A8DB0@localhost> <20051110000530.GC12619@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPU affinity in new ULE scheduler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:08:21 -0000 Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ? I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was "clear" ULE was a better alternative for performance then 4BSD Thanks At 19:05 2005-11-09, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:16:31PM -0600, Jon Brisbin wrote: > > I can't find any information on how to set the CPU affinity for > processes in the > > FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler. > >That's because you can't. ULE gives lower performance on the >workloads I have tested anyway. This may be fixed in the future. > >Kris > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 00:14:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5AF16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE2443D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AD51A3C29; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:14:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1ACA2513A2; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:14:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:14:42 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ian Lord Message-ID: <20051110001442.GA28042@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <437220DF.4127.12A8DB0@localhost> <20051110000530.GC12619@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.3.4.2.20051109190705.048069a0@pop.msdi.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109190705.048069a0@pop.msdi.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: CPU affinity in new ULE scheduler X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:14:44 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 07:08:12PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote: > Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ? >=20 > I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was "clear" ULE was=20 > a better alternative for performance then 4BSD Yes, in the workloads I have tested. Others have reported similar things. You should carefully measure it yourself on your workloads to verify which is better. Kris --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDcpDyWry0BWjoQKURAuNJAJ9L0PkuB8UIRfZ1zRGhtpASvY9H+wCg+Cc+ w4/hw/t0Ts09krWOo73UZrc= =De91 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 01:14:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8723216A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:14:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0321643D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 17F8D7E12; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:14:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD3D7DEF; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:14:20 -0500 (EST) References: Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: "francisco@natserv.net" To: user Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:14:19 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I chroot rsync like I chroot ftp ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:14:22 -0000 user writes: > What is the equivalent mechanism for rsync ? I have not used it myself, but was looking at rssh tonight. There is also a program, not in the ports, called scopy or something of the like. Check the rssh port in the /usr/pots tree.. go to their web page. The mention the URL for the other program. I am looking to do the same thing, chroot rsync, so will be looking at those two options I mentioned above in coming days. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 01:23:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E817F16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:23:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from readbsd@mind.net) Received: from morpheus.mind.net (morpheus.mind.net [69.9.130.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5051743D48 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:23:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from readbsd@mind.net) Received: (qmail 23353 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Nov 2005 01:23:13 -0000 Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:23:13 -0800 From: John Fox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Vocabulary-Word: tiresomely X-Quip: Fly the white flag of war! Subject: Status of 6.0 for production systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:23:14 -0000 I remember back a while when 5.x had been recently released as STABLE and the conventional wisdom said not to use it in production until the 5.3 release. Is there any such conventional wisdom as regards 6.x? Thanks, John -- jjf@mind.net John Fox, Senior Systems Administrator InfoStructure - http://www.mind.net Vox: (541)773-5000 / Fax: (541)488-7599 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 01:31:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C4F16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC74343D48 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:31:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (cpe-065-184-205-194.ec.res.rr.com [65.184.205.194]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id jAA1VIWe000918 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:31:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4372A516.2060205@ec.rr.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:40:38 -0500 From: jason henson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: leak or some other problem in nve0 driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:31:22 -0000 Sometimes my nic did become unusable and if I try a ping it says something like ping: sendto: buffer full. I forget to save an exact copy of that. But here is what netstat -m had 82/728/810 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 79/339/418/17088 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/79/4528 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 178K/860K/1038K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 132 calls to protocol drain routines I had this simillar issue in 6 beta so I increase some of the network and kernel( or other?) buffer sizes and that seemed to fix it. Then yesterday my pc did it again. Does anyone have any ideas on the cause? It is a nforce 2 epox 8rda3i motherboard. FreeBSD barton.flcl.net 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #2: Mon Nov 7 03:04:16 EST 2005 jason@barton.flcl.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RYOKO i386 FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #2: Mon Nov 7 03:04:16 EST 2005 jason@barton.flcl.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RYOKO mptable_probe: MP Config Table has bad signature: ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2700+ (2029.61-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x6a0 Stepping = 0 Features=0x383fbff AMD Features=0xc0400800 real memory = 536805376 (511 MB) avail memory = 515981312 (492 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link2: on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 12 on acpi0 pci_link4: on acpi0 pci_link5: irq 4 on acpi0 pci_link6: irq 3 on acpi0 pci_link7: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link8: on acpi0 pci_link9: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link10: on acpi0 pci_link11: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link12: irq 7 on acpi0 pci_link13: on acpi0 pci_link14: on acpi0 pci_link15: on acpi0 pci_link16: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link17: irq 17 on acpi0 pci_link18: irq 18 on acpi0 pci_link19: irq 19 on acpi0 pci_link20: irq 16 on acpi0 pci_link21: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link22: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link23: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link24: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link25: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link26: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link27: irq 23 on acpi0 pci_link28: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link29: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link30: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link31: irq 0 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.2 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.4 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 0.5 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xe2003000-0xe2003fff irq 20 at device 2.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xe2004000-0xe2004fff irq 21 at device 2.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xe2005000-0xe20050ff irq 22 at device 2.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 4 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered nve0: port 0xe400-0xe407 mem 0xe2000000-0xe2000fff irq 20 at device 4.0 on pci0 nve0: Ethernet address 00:04:61:24:68:01 miibus0: on nve0 rlphy0: on miibus0 rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto nve0: Ethernet address: 00:04:61:24:68:01 nve0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff,0xd400-0xd47f mem 0xe2001000-0xe2001fff irq 21 at device 6.0 on pci0 pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: pcib1: at device 8.0 on pci0 pci_link18: BIOS IRQ 21 for 0.6.INTA is invalid pci1: on pcib1 atapci0: port 0xa000-0xa007,0xa400-0xa403,0xa800-0xa807,0xac00-0xac03,0xb000-0xb00f mem 0xe1080000-0xe10803ff irq 17 at device 9.0 on pci1 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 ata4: on atapci0 ata5: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 9.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci1 ata1: on atapci1 pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pci2: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) acpi_tz0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xccfff,0xd0000-0xd3fff,0xd4000-0xd87ff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ums0: Microsoft Microsoft 3-Button Mouse with IntelliEye(TM), rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2029610897 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 ad4: 239372MB at ata2-master SATA150 acd1: DVDR at ata3-master SATA150 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 01:54:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855A216A41F; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from myfreebsd@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao02.cox.net (eastrmmtao02.cox.net [68.230.240.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29BF43D49; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:54:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from myfreebsd@cox.net) Received: from [172.18.52.8] (really [172.18.52.73]) by eastrmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20051110015328.URCV22723.eastrmmtao02.cox.net@[172.18.52.8]>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:53:28 -0500 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: To: , Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:53:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20051110015328.URCV22723.eastrmmtao02.cox.net@[172.18.52.8]> Cc: Subject: Fails to boot after buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:54:19 -0000 Hey all, I don't know if this is a bug somewhere in the source but my system will not boot after I buildworld FreeBSD 6.0. I get the error: Can't work out which disk to boot from This error occurs right after the loader is booted and before the FreeBSD menu. System of course stalls here and says to press a key to reboot. I used the GENERIC kernel, empty loader.conf, my cvs tag = RELENG_6 and my make.conf has: CPUTYPE?=pentium4 CFLAGS= -O2 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math CXXFLAGS+= -fconserve-space COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math System runs fine from install just fails after updating source and rebuilding "world". System is: Dell Dimension 9100 P4 3.0ghz HTT 1 20G IDE 2 150G SATA (RAID 1) Any suggestions? David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 01:55:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1231516A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:55:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F51243D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:55:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jAA1wZb92850; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:58:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Miguel" , Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:55:39 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <437134C2.1060003@123.com.sv> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: HP DL380 hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:55:48 -0000 try to boot 6.0 with acpi disabled Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Miguel >Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:29 PM >To: shih@math.jussieu.fr >Cc: FreeBSD Questions >Subject: Re: HP DL380 hangs on boot > > >Albert Shih wrote: > >> >> >>I've DL 360 and I've use 5.4 without any problem. >> >>Have you try to disable HyperThreading in HP-Bios ? You can >try to change >>the OS identification in HP-Bios too. >> >> >> >Im trying to install 6.0R, and i already disabled > >HyperThreading > >This used to be a linux gentoo machine, so the OS >identification is Linux, should i change it? > >Regards, > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/163 - Release Date: >11/8/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 02:37:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A249416A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:37:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brooke.84@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay13-f8.bay13.hotmail.com [64.4.31.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726D843D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:37:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brooke.84@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:37:32 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 80.15.249.148 by by13fd.bay13.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:37:32 GMT X-Originating-IP: [61.95.65.37] X-Originating-Email: [brooke.84@hotmail.com] X-Sender: brooke.84@hotmail.com From: "Brooke Landers" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:37:32 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2005 02:37:32.0968 (UTC) FILETIME=[B3D6B280:01C5E59F] Subject: Configuring default 6.0 install to send mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:37:33 -0000 Hello list. I am learning FreeBSD and I'd like to know how to configure Sendmail to simply forward mail although it seems it's doing this by default. I can send mail, but it's being rejected since mylocalhost.mydomain.com doesn't resolve. I'm using internal hosts that will never have DNS entries. I'm looking for somewhere where I can specify that user@mylocalhost can send mail as user@mydomain.com. I'm pretty sure that my mail would be accepted if I can do this. I don't want to set up a mail server, I'd just like to know how I can get my logs and admin mail forwarded to an external address. I apologize for not sending this to a sendmail list, but I figured there may be something simple and specific to FreeBSD that I have overlooked. Thank you for any help :) BL _________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 02:42:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2DB16A41F; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:42:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mailgate.bytemobile.com (mailgate.bytemobile.com [209.10.233.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9747F43D4C; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:42:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:42:25 -0800 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: myfreebsd@cox.net Message-ID: <20051110024225.GA94049@flame.pc> References: <20051110015328.URCV22723.eastrmmtao02.cox.net@[172.18.52.8]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051110015328.URCV22723.eastrmmtao02.cox.net@[172.18.52.8]> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2005 02:42:28.0176 (UTC) FILETIME=[63CBDD00:01C5E5A0] Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fails to boot after buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:42:35 -0000 On 2005-11-09 20:53, myfreebsd@cox.net wrote: > Hey all, > > I don't know if this is a bug somewhere in the source but my > system will not boot after I buildworld FreeBSD 6.0. I get the > error: > > Can't work out which disk to boot from > > This error occurs right after the loader is booted and before > the FreeBSD menu. System of course stalls here and says to > press a key to reboot. > > I used the GENERIC kernel, empty loader.conf, my cvs tag = > RELENG_6 and my make.conf has: > > CPUTYPE?=pentium4 > CFLAGS= -O2 -mmmx -msse -msse2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math > CXXFLAGS+= -fconserve-space > COPTFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math Try without all those fancy optimizations. There's a very good comment in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf' which you may be interested in reading carefully: # CFLAGS controls the compiler settings used when compiling C code. # Note that optimization settings other than -O and -O2 are not recommended # or supported for compiling the world or the kernel - please revert any # nonstandard optimization settings to "-O" or -O2 before submitting bug # reports without patches to the developers. - Giorgos PS: Please, ignore the automatically forced 'footer' below. It's automatically added by the Exchange server I'm behind and has no relation whatsoever to non-work email I post. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, do not forward this email to any other person, delete this e-mail and destroy all copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 02:42:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2EF16A439 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:42:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830D743D66 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:42:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F671A3C24; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:42:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9A78051226; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:42:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:42:48 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: John Fox Message-ID: <20051110024248.GA61785@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of 6.0 for production systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:42:50 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 05:23:13PM -0800, John Fox wrote: > I remember back a while when 5.x had been recently released > as STABLE and the conventional wisdom said not to use it in > production until the 5.3 release. >=20 > Is there any such conventional wisdom as regards 6.x? FreeBSD 6.0 is the most stable .0 release ever, and more stable than 5.4 in general (although of course you may encounter a bug). Kris --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDcrOnWry0BWjoQKURAg0QAKCWOflQFv11AYKzYH84w8gQ3yO2tgCg5NY5 AFLO3H3qKKaEk7TUtYYkykw= =bPwC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 03:02:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A47716A427 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:02:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from bristolsystems.com (h-68-167-239-98.lsanca54.covad.net [68.167.239.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0740C43D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:02:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from workdog ([192.168.1.201]) by bristolsystems.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jAA328n22526; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:02:08 -0800 From: "Gayn Winters" To: "'Ahnjoan Amous'" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:01:59 -0800 Message-ID: <028f01c5e5a3$212dd950$c901a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <5e575c8a0511091826s3c24a3adkf8f6acca1c66fd68@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Masquerading Virtual domains in sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:02:11 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ahnjoan Amous [mailto:ahnjoan@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 6:27 PM > To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Masquerading Virtual domains in sendmail > > On 11/9/05, Gayn Winters wrote: > > I'm installing sendmail.8.13.3 on FBSD 5.4 on node.domain1.com. > > > > I've configured /etc/mail/local-host-names to accept mail for > > domain1.com and domain2.com. > > > > My user names look like bob.domain1.com and (a different Bob) > > bob.domain2.com. > > > > Inside /etc/mail/virtusertable I map > > bob@domain1.com bob.domain1.com > > bob@domain2.com bob.domain2.com > > > > Inbound all is well. BUT, > > > > What I can't figure out is how to masquerade mail from > bob.domain1.com > > as being from bob@domain1.com AND ALSO HAVE bob.domain2.com > masqueraded > > as being from bob@domain2.com. > > > > One test of this working is to be able to register both Bob's in the > > FreeBSD mailing lists as bob@domain1.com and bob@domain2.com. > > > > Ideas? References? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -gayn > > > > Bristol Systems Inc. > > 714/532-6776 > > www.bristolsystems.com > Try a Google search on "genericstable". I'm not sure if this is > exactly what you are looking for as you are trying to send mail via > the same username but it is what I use to specify sender domain for > different users. Understanding this may not be how you want to solve > the issue, you could send as bobA@ and bobB@ and genericstable could > translate that to whatever you would like. > > Ahnjoan > Thank you Ahnjoan. It looks like reversing the two columns of virtusertable to get genericstable gets me part of what I need; namely, the mail headers should translate correctly. Unfortunately, digging through the bat book and googling, it doesn't seem like the envelopes will get masqueraded, when I actually need them to be masqueraded on a per domain basis. The macro MASQUERADE_AS seems to be a global operation, which I don't want. Does anyone know if FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope') will work without MASQUERADE_AS? Somehow to me it seems like most ISP's have this problem. Thanks again, -gayn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 03:08:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05B616A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:08:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@grokking.org) Received: from herbert.sohotech.ca (herbert.sohotech.ca [206.116.63.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C72443D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:08:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@grokking.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by herbert.sohotech.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9D517BC40 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:08:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from herbert.sohotech.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (herbert.sohotech.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86140-07 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:08:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.33.4] (heinlein.sohotech.ca [192.168.33.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by herbert.sohotech.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B125E17B57B for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:08:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4372B9AF.8000300@grokking.org> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:08:31 -0800 From: Greg Maruszeczka User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sohotech.ca Subject: Re: Configuring default 6.0 install to send mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:08:33 -0000 Brooke Landers wrote: > Hello list. I am learning FreeBSD and I'd like to know how to configure > Sendmail to simply forward mail although it seems it's doing this by > default. I can send mail, but it's being rejected since > mylocalhost.mydomain.com doesn't resolve. I'm using internal hosts that > will never have DNS entries. > > I'm looking for somewhere where I can specify that user@mylocalhost can > send mail as user@mydomain.com. I'm pretty sure that my mail would be > accepted if I can do this. > > I don't want to set up a mail server, I'd just like to know how I can > get my logs and admin mail forwarded to an external address. I apologize > for not sending this to a sendmail list, but I figured there may be > something simple and specific to FreeBSD that I have overlooked. > > Thank you for any help :) > BL > If that's all you want to do the simplest thing is this (as root): cd /etc/mail vi aliases Look for the entry for root: uncomment it and add whatever external address you want after the colon. After saving and exiting: newaliases Now all system mail should be sent to the external address you specified in /etc/mail/aliases. Test it by doing this: mail -s "Test" root G From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 03:18:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988DA16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:18:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@grokking.org) Received: from herbert.sohotech.ca (herbert.sohotech.ca [206.116.63.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194FF43D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:18:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from greg@grokking.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by herbert.sohotech.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0994417BC4F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from herbert.sohotech.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (herbert.sohotech.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86140-09 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.33.4] (heinlein.sohotech.ca [192.168.33.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by herbert.sohotech.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3456D17B57B for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:18:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4372BBEE.7000006@grokking.org> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:18:06 -0800 From: Greg Maruszeczka User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sohotech.ca Subject: Re: Configuring default 6.0 install to send mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:18:07 -0000 Brooke Landers wrote: > Hello list. I am learning FreeBSD and I'd like to know how to configure > Sendmail to simply forward mail although it seems it's doing this by > default. I can send mail, but it's being rejected since > mylocalhost.mydomain.com doesn't resolve. I'm using internal hosts that > will never have DNS entries. > > I'm looking for somewhere where I can specify that user@mylocalhost can > send mail as user@mydomain.com. I'm pretty sure that my mail would be > accepted if I can do this. > > I don't want to set up a mail server, I'd just like to know how I can > get my logs and admin mail forwarded to an external address. I apologize > for not sending this to a sendmail list, but I figured there may be > something simple and specific to FreeBSD that I have overlooked. > Uh, sorry for the noise on that last reply, everybody. I should have read more carefully BEFORE hitting send... Brooke, can you post what's output to your /var/log/maillog after you try to send from that box? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 03:20:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4058716A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from bristolsystems.com (h-68-167-239-98.lsanca54.covad.net [68.167.239.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1FE43D48 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:20:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from workdog ([192.168.1.201]) by bristolsystems.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jAA3Kun22560; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:20:56 -0800 From: "Gayn Winters" To: "'Brooke Landers'" , Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:20:47 -0800 Message-ID: <029001c5e5a5$c1a30ca0$c901a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Configuring default 6.0 install to send mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:20:58 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Brooke Landers > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 6:38 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Configuring default 6.0 install to send mail > > > Hello list. I am learning FreeBSD and I'd like to know how to > configure > Sendmail to simply forward mail although it seems it's doing this by > default. I can send mail, but it's being rejected since > mylocalhost.mydomain.com doesn't resolve. I'm using internal > hosts that will > never have DNS entries. > > I'm looking for somewhere where I can specify that > user@mylocalhost can send > mail as user@mydomain.com. I'm pretty sure that my mail would > be accepted if > I can do this. > > I don't want to set up a mail server, I'd just like to know > how I can get my > logs and admin mail forwarded to an external address. I > apologize for not > sending this to a sendmail list, but I figured there may be > something simple > and specific to FreeBSD that I have overlooked. > > Thank you for any help :) > BL Check out section 22.8 of the Handbook regarding ssmtp. -gayn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 03:28:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5897B16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:28:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE63043D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:28:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 29813 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2005 14:28:00 +1100 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO ?10.168.101.24?) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 10 Nov 2005 14:28:00 +1100 Message-ID: <4372BE5E.2030505@meijome.net> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:28:30 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lord References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109122614.0466c9a8@pop.msdi.ca> <06e801c5e556$7971daa0$05dc3818@mdm246a3e4f6fc> <6.2.3.4.2.20051109131857.04659908@pop.msdi.ca> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051109131857.04659908@pop.msdi.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jon Krause Subject: Re: Web Balancing with multicast X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:28:01 -0000 Ian Lord wrote: > Thanks for the hint, but this is an active/passive software so only one > host can answer request while others wait to see if they need to become > master (because master has failed) > > (Ian, please do NOT top post) you may want to look into wackamole, which uses the spread protocol. also read on the wacktrl for some extra control. best, Beto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 03:52:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D503416A41F; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:52:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0646443D46; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:52:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.17]) by mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E85AC8E0; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (mail-in-07.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.47]) by mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8327412E5C6; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dslb-084-061-132-055.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.132.55]) by mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3257F2BF; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from kiste.my.domain (root@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAA3qPZP026159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kiste.my.domain (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAA3qPw8068060; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by kiste.my.domain (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jAA3qOsO068059; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kiste.my.domain: lofi set sender to lofi@freebsd.org using -f From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?iso-8859-1?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?iso-8859-1?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: George Katsanos , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE Konqueror:Can i have konqueror without KDEstuff port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:52:32 -0000 On Wednesday, 9. November 2005 09:50, George Katsanos wrote: > KDE is a huge package , and if you're trying to portupgrade to p3 550 > that's a hard thing to do.3 days now! :-( > I just want konqueror , is there any way [or do you know the exact port] > that will save me from installing kde base , kde , kdelibs and zillions of > kde stuff [which I hate] at my computer? For konqueror, all you need is x11/kdebase3 (and its respective dependencies). For extra features, you might also want misc/konq-plugins (will install as kdeaddons-konq-plugins), for some embedded media support you might want to install multimedia/kmplayer and for an embedded image viewer with an autozooming feature, you might want to install graphics/gwenview. If you're not sure what you can safely delete (or want to make sure you don't miss anything you can delete), do pkg_deinstall -rf arts\* and afterwards portinstall kdebase. Once you're done with that, you can reduce the number of installed ports further by installing sysutils/pkg_cutleaves and use that to find ports which aren't in use by any other ports and delete them if you wish. > Also , when I start konqueror 'kdeinit' is run also ! 3 instances of it.any > way of avoiding that? Kdeinit just wraps around the kioslave processes that Konqueror uses to do the actual input/output of data (kio_http, kio_ftp, kio_file, etc). You can turn the kdeinit wrapper off by setting KDE_FORK_SLAVES=1 in your environment (note that this option has known issues, like https://bugs.kde.org/votes.cgi?action=show_bug&bug_id=88557 - I think however that none of them should affect you if all you run is konqueror). Cheers, -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 03:56:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B69616A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:56:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4480443D49 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:56:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 30805 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2005 14:56:54 +1100 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO ?10.168.101.24?) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 10 Nov 2005 14:56:54 +1100 Message-ID: <4372C4FE.2060809@meijome.net> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:56:46 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Owen References: <4371EF5C.ED9B.00D8.0@sonoma.dds.ca.gov> In-Reply-To: <4371EF5C.ED9B.00D8.0@sonoma.dds.ca.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Application Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:56:58 -0000 Keith Owen wrote: > I was wanting to know when Vmware 5.0 workstation will be in the ports tree, or if there is a way to install the boxed version. > Thanks, > Keith Owen > AFAIK is not natively supported for FBSD. Vmware's support wouldn't want to comment at all whether it'd run (or how well) with linux emulation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 03:59:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFD416A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:59:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC0C43D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:59:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so320994nzp for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:59:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oycqJjzS/cK1gM6KzkSnXbsdOmhZBBFXRZ4xHrHCkG7TaMKZIVNneYtOWHWepjTgTOhxT6uZWO1zVYIvzb5Q4cn2jYY42+qAiSnc6+L0WLzxedGbypop2TK9j6rFzVNNHt7HiJc2Fx1pgpFI5gYAIf+TVXdGjap6JG/hiC2jVh0= Received: by 10.64.250.3 with SMTP id x3mr218246qbh; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:49:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.253.2 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:49:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990511091749h7b7c0753vbf7adbce94eff6cc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:49:29 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: John Fox In-Reply-To: <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of 6.0 for production systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:59:51 -0000 On 11/9/05, John Fox wrote: > I remember back a while when 5.x had been recently released > as STABLE and the conventional wisdom said not to use it in > production until the 5.3 release. > > Is there any such conventional wisdom as regards 6.x? 5.0 introduced a lot of new features and replaced some major components, so the warning was that it would take longer than normal to reach a level of stability suitable for critical systems. As I understand it, 6.0 is primarily concentrating on improving some of the major stuff introduced in 5.x, and shouldn't take nearly as long to become a "stable" platform. Even so, conventional wisdom generally warns against using any X.0 release for critical applications, but that depends on your definition of "critical" and your level of tolerance for excitement. IIRC, the release announcement had something to say on the topic, too. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 04:41:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148E316A431 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sunil_tv@yahoo.com) Received: from web30004.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30004.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9768A43D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:41:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sunil_tv@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 66313 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Nov 2005 04:41:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=59tS4xHPeum0RP+mfeL6yA8QBWmlZdT361YQRlQ7EoSt/hu+qoigsgWOK3MHMO0gq7LiExILaK4ddxLGIF7lqVIdWzWasO5ssPAPvnFhEgwIUzBr/YrVwQfGYtG2P7ZupTFqs256Najjoud2FKG1em7b58aNFCwfeQcGNGxhC+8= ; Message-ID: <20051110044156.66311.qmail@web30004.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.163.106.242] by web30004.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:41:56 PST Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:41:56 -0800 (PST) From: Sunil Kumar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051109104740.79DF116A422@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Intel 2200bg wireless lan support in FreeBSD6.0 stable release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:41:58 -0000 Hi, Thanks for the suggestions. I was able to get the wireless lan up and running now on my laptop. I used it for an hour and it seems to run stably... Basically i first got the iwi-firmware-2.3_2.tbz package and then installed it on the laptop and i was able to get connected to my wirless router and then to internet.That was great... Thanks a lot again to FreeBSD community... With thanks and regards Sunil --- freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wrote: > > From: Dinesh Nair > CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > To: Sunil Kumar > Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:38:15 +0800 > Subject: Re: Intel 2200bg wireless lan support in > FreeBSD6.0 stable release > > > On 11/09/05 04:24 Sunil Kumar said the following: > > 1. Is there a document/help site where the steps > are documented? > > http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ipw/iwi-freebsd.html > > > 2. If I execute "kldload -v if_iwi" then in the > dmesg output, i get a > > message saying "download firmware". What firmware > should i have to > > download? I cannot use ports collection(pkg_add or > make install clean) > > install /usr/ports/net/iwi-firmware, but... > > > because that laptop does not have ethernet > connection(I think there is > > no support for the Marvell Yukon 88E80836 > chipset). > > ...since you dont have a network up and running, > that may be a problem. do > check if the iwi-firmware package is available on > one of the 6.0 ISO CDROMs. > > > 3.If is execute this command " iwicontrol -i iwi0 > -d > > /usr/local/libdata/if_iwi -m bss" i get a error > message that this > > iwicontrol is installed as part of iwi-firmware. > > -- > Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs > go to heaven." > dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) > http://www.alphaque.com/ > +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ > | for a in past present future; do > | > | for b in clients employers associates relatives > neighbours pets; do | > | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the > opinions of my $a $b." | > | done; done > | > +=========================================================================+ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 04:45:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08D016A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A2343D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so485700wra for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:45:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:sent-from-pda:user-agent; b=EHq4SM2kTxQor2c8qxYb9qeMC+kOvlX2144iBpdNV/igVUU2HYMfem1fTq3wb9uDbML4DJuLO9qVonHDvufxeuxz4r+96PU9GdMeetYx0KEm3cPrl1rHzrzL6LKIj8F3R7we5Zp+//C2OuGNSRbmSarGoNRTxdguPJ4hLdbgnaA= Received: by 10.64.201.20 with SMTP id y20mr89042qbf; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:28:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ( [24.193.224.187]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id o32sm355572qbe.2005.11.09.15.28.12; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:28:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:09:01 -0500 From: Mike Hernandez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051109220901.GA22021@dementia.beyondnormal.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sent-From-PDA: Yes User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Good idea or Bad idea? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:45:05 -0000 Hello all! I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 now, and of course I'm thinking about my upgrade to 6.0. What I'm wondering is if it's a Good Idea or a Bad Idea (tm) to build everything from source. I have experience building linux from scratch (linuxfromscratch.org) and I have learned that sometimes it's just a better idea to use binary packages (i.e. building everything from source can be a waste of time if there is no performance gain, and it's easy to screw up.) I have no trouble following docs, so I'm not really worried about blowing everything up in the process (even though I might haha...) I'm just wondering if there are any real (noticeable) performance increases if I build my kernel and base system from source. Of course either way my ports will be compiled. Any feedback is appreciated - especially in regards to {C,XX}FLAGS and even more appreciated in the case of "DO NOT USE -br34k-all when compiling __" ;) I've had my share of "oops I guess ____ didn't like -fomit-frame-pointer" in the past with linux ;) Thanks! Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 04:49:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9801B16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2137443D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EB6222401 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:49:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07076-13 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:49:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145572204A6 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:49:35 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:49:33 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20051109220901.GA22021@dementia.beyondnormal.net> In-Reply-To: <20051109220901.GA22021@dementia.beyondnormal.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1222953.3xb6bZjEec"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511092249.34405.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: Good idea or Bad idea? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:49:38 -0000 --nextPart1222953.3xb6bZjEec Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 09 November 2005 16:09, Mike Hernandez wrote: > I'm just wondering if there are any real (noticeable) performance > increases if I build my kernel and base system from source. Of course > either way my ports will be compiled. I think there is, but I end my optimizations at setting the CPUTYPE variabl= e=20 in /etc/make.conf. FreeBSD 6.0 has sane and quick compiler defaults, so I= =20 usually leave the rest alone. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1222953.3xb6bZjEec Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBDctFe5sRg+Y0CpvERAnYwAKCIi/H8KmxvA45gyDUKPd3Qdbh2mACglfny q4nP5wnxag1s1z6RI/AJXhU= =ciqh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1222953.3xb6bZjEec-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 04:52:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DA516A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brooke.84@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay13-f14.bay13.hotmail.com [64.4.31.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A152343D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brooke.84@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:52:17 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 80.15.249.154 by by13fd.bay13.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:16 GMT X-Originating-IP: [61.95.65.37] X-Originating-Email: [brooke.84@hotmail.com] X-Sender: brooke.84@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <029001c5e5a5$c1a30ca0$c901a8c0@workdog> From: "Brooke Landers" To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:52:16 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2005 04:52:17.0002 (UTC) FILETIME=[864C64A0:01C5E5B2] Cc: Subject: RE: Configuring default 6.0 install to send mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:52:18 -0000 >Check out section 22.8 of the Handbook regarding ssmtp. > >-gayn > Thanks very much Gary and Gayn for your help. I will go with ssmtp. Not that I have anything against Sendmail.. ;) BL _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 06:46:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE8B16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:46:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC04643D48 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:46:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jAA6k0oP086415 ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:46:00 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 166 Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (galois1.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.116]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jAA6jxQP009740 ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:45:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by galois1.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jAA6jwge005540 ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:45:58 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by galois1.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id jAA6jw6t005539; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:45:58 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:45:58 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Miguel Message-ID: <20051110064558.GA4313@math.jussieu.fr> References: <4370EE2F.5000109@123.com.sv> <20051108232251.GK16216@math.jussieu.fr> <437134C2.1060003@123.com.sv> <20051109081037.GA9696@math.jussieu.fr> <43722100.8050600@123.com.sv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <43722100.8050600@123.com.sv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:46:02 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 4372ECA8.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: HP DL380 hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:46:15 -0000 Le 09/11/2005 à 10:17:04-0600, Miguel a écrit > Albert Shih wrote: > > > > > > >I don't remenber my OS identification and I can tell you because all my > >server is in production (I can reboot them). But I think (but not sure) my > >OS identification is windows. > > > Albert, i tried all the OS types, the only one that worked was Other OS, > what is the meaning of this ? > What is the diference between select linux or windows, do you have an > idea why only works with other os ? Sorry but I don't really known. I just find this because I buy a ML 350 for windows (ok ok that's bad idea) and when I receive my ML 350 I can boot Win2.3k. I think that's impossible (because 80% etc...) And I find this very strange thing. I loose one day on this OS type. >From this day on any HP box don't boot the first thing I go to check is this OS type. More fun on other ML 350 with Win2k, he boot only .... if OS type is Linux. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Thu Nov 10 07:42:05 CET 2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 06:52:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D6316A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:52:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd3mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF3043D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:52:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd5mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.233]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IPQ0099A8FU6CD0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:52:42 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml4so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.148]) by pd5mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IPQ00CGW8FUF420@pd5mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:52:42 -0700 (MST) Received: from [10.180.136.96] (S01060010a72631f9.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.46.209]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IPQ006EM8FTTR@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:52:41 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:53:10 -0700 From: Danny MacMillan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <4372EE56.3060802@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) Subject: portmanager -slid deletes the wrong port! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:52:43 -0000 Hi, I'm running portmanager to do some port maintenance on one of my servers. I'm trying to delete devel/cvs2svn. Each time I try to delete it, it deletes devel/python instead. This is exceedingly disconcerting. Has anyone else experienced problems of this nature? Have I done something somehow to screw up my system? The reason I use portmanager is because I thought it was foolproof :) -- Danny MacMillan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 08:14:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3639E16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:14:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BBA43D49 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:14:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29AA1A3C25; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:14:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E001751516; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:14:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:14:25 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bob Johnson Message-ID: <20051110081424.GA46702@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net> <54db43990511091749h7b7c0753vbf7adbce94eff6cc@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54db43990511091749h7b7c0753vbf7adbce94eff6cc@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: John Fox , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of 6.0 for production systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:14:28 -0000 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:49:29PM -0500, Bob Johnson wrote: > On 11/9/05, John Fox wrote: > > I remember back a while when 5.x had been recently released > > as STABLE and the conventional wisdom said not to use it in > > production until the 5.3 release. > > > > Is there any such conventional wisdom as regards 6.x? >=20 > 5.0 introduced a lot of new features and replaced some major > components, so the warning was that it would take longer than normal > to reach a level of stability suitable for critical systems. >=20 > As I understand it, 6.0 is primarily concentrating on improving some > of the major stuff introduced in 5.x, and shouldn't take nearly as > long to become a "stable" platform. Even so, conventional wisdom > generally warns against using any X.0 release for critical > applications, but that depends on your definition of "critical" and > your level of tolerance for excitement. You really shouldn't think of 6.0 as "like a usual .0 release, so handle with care", but more like "5.4 plus extra optimization and stability fixes". We spent nearly 6 months during the release cycle on stress-testing and fixing stability bugs, and that hard work resulted in a lot of fixes to long-standing bugs that have existed since FreeBSD 5.x. In addition to the improved stability, performance is much better than 5.4 in several areas. Naturally there may be some regressions, but in the average case 6.0 seems to be an outstanding release of FreeBSD no matter what version number you give it. Kris --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDcwFfWry0BWjoQKURAtP4AKCZO6dDnJnRX9+mKR9pan4afQ5y9QCfWjrQ SxwwwZtFuKWNXi2IF/7jnV8= =MqHV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 09:07:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D85E16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:07:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from priv-edmwes25.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [204.209.205.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA60943D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:07:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwebman@telus.net) Received: from [10.0.10.6] (really [154.20.242.227]) by priv-edmwes25.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051110090727.NZJD17831.priv-edmwes25.telusplanet.net@[10.0.10.6]> for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:07:27 -0700 From: Dave Webster To: FreeBSD questions Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:05:20 -0800 Message-Id: <1131613531.814.17.camel@Freeman.myLQ.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: adding a second hard drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:07:29 -0000 To solve a problem I'm having with /var running out of space, I decided to add a second hard drive. I found info at freebsd.org on adding disks using sysinstall and followed the advice. The old disk is a Maxtor 6Y080L0 80G as ad0 and the new disk is a Maxtor 6Y120P0 as ad3. I ran sysinstall, chose ad3 and parition it with: / 512M, /swap 2G, /tmp 3G, /var 4G, /usr 30G, /data 76G. Did an installation with Kern source and documentation. Added a new user, and set a password for root. I added the FreeBSD boot manager. I rebooted to ad0 (didn't have the FreeBSD boot manager on this drive yet), and found I could no longer login as the regular user and that my root password was the one I had just set up on ad3. I adduser my old login and assigned it the original ID and got back the settings in my home directory, although I don't know what I've doen to the configuration files in /etc. I tried to put the FreeBSD boot manager on ad0 with: boot0cfg -B ad0 but get an erro: boot0cfg: open /de/ad0: no such file or directory I've googled this problem but have found little help except that it shouldn't happen and it should be reported. I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 stable. I'm temped to start over from scratch but would hate to lose everythin on ad0 without first transferring it to ad3. I've tried to mount ad3 and ad3c (the only references to ad3 in /dev) using: mount /dev/ad3 /mnt/bigdrive but get an error: mount: /dev/ad3 on /mnt/bigdrive: incorrect super block So I'm pretty lost. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I've spent 4-5 hrs googling for solutions but nothing seems to work. thanks in advance Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 09:43:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF52616A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:43:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssofroni@cytanet.com.cy) Received: from demokritos3.cytanet.com.cy (demokritos3.cytanet.com.cy [195.14.130.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691F143D48 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:43:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssofroni@cytanet.com.cy) Received: from cytanet.com.cy (webmail.cytanet.com.cy [195.14.130.184]) by demokritos3.cytanet.com.cy (Postfix) with SMTP id A6323B3BD2 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:43:00 +0200 (EET) From: "stefanos sofroniou" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:43:00 eet Message-id: <43731624.78e.0@cytanet.com.cy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: By virus scanner at Cytanet Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 6 DVD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ssofroni@cytanet.com.cy List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:43:05 -0000 Dear sirs, I would like to know when you will release the official FreeBSD 6 DVD so I can purchase it from FreeBSDMall. Also I want to know what is including this DVD. I think must be like other UNIX-like environments that have all the OS files plus some extra software that you can download them from the Internet. If so I will be very happy. I am using FreeBSD for a few months and up to now I am very satisfied with its usage. Also recommend me some good books how to administer or install properly a FreeBSD server. Thank you very much Stefanos Sofroniou From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 10:38:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809E516A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:38:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF4543D49 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:38:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jAAAfQb94928; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:41:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Brooke Landers" , Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:38:31 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Configuring default 6.0 install to send mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:38:35 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Brooke Landers >Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 6:38 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Configuring default 6.0 install to send mail > > >Hello list. I am learning FreeBSD and I'd like to know how to configure >Sendmail to simply forward mail although it seems it's doing this by >default. I can send mail, but it's being rejected since >mylocalhost.mydomain.com doesn't resolve. I'm using internal >hosts that will >never have DNS entries. > >I'm looking for somewhere where I can specify that >user@mylocalhost can send >mail as user@mydomain.com. I'm pretty sure that my mail would >be accepted if >I can do this. > >I don't want to set up a mail server, I'd just like to know how >I can get my >logs and admin mail forwarded to an external address. Set macro DS in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf to the real mailserver, reboot. DSfoo.example.com Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 10:49:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDE916A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from recife.ipadnet.com.br (recife.ipadnet.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E847243D49 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from marioLobo (spyketembratel.ipadnet.com.br [200.249.204.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by recife.ipadnet.com.br (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jAAB7ojg004375 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:07:51 -0300 From: "Mario Lobo" Organization: IPAD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:51:18 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4372FBF6.27513.71418551@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <029001c5e5a5$c1a30ca0$c901a8c0@workdog> References: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Content-description: Mail message body X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0545-1, 09/11/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: Configuring default 6.0 install to send mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:49:40 -0000 On 9 Nov 2005 at 19:20, Gayn Winters wrote: > > Check out section 22.8 of the Handbook regarding ssmtp. > > -gayn > Acctually, it=B4s section 23.8 -- //| //|| // | // || -//--//---|| ARIO LOBO // // || --------------------------------- mario.lobo@ipad.com.br http://www.ipad.com.br From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 10:51:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AAF16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:51:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B8F43D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:51:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id jAAAs1b94967; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:54:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "John Fox" , Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:51:05 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Status of 6.0 for production systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:51:09 -0000 There are some things broken in 5.4 that are still broken in 6.0 with regards to support of older hardware. In particular the ida driver is a mess - EISA support in that was busted years ago, then 5.X busted support for more 'modern' systems like the Compaq 1600R HP "DL" series of systems are kind of a moving target anyway, unfortunately. For those sytems I still use 4.11 (in fact I just setup 2 new 4.11 production systems two days ago) However, 6.0 is a requirement for currently shipping hardware, in particular the Intel series of boxed "server" motherboards, if you want to use raid and sata drives, since Intel seems to like to change it's motherboard chipsets as fast as most people change their underpants. I'm actually building a 6.0 production server today. (5.4 and earlier will not recognize the disk array) It would be nice if we could get more support for SATA raid in the atacontrol program. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of John Fox >Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 5:23 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Status of 6.0 for production systems > > >I remember back a while when 5.x had been recently released >as STABLE and the conventional wisdom said not to use it in >production until the 5.3 release. > >Is there any such conventional wisdom as regards 6.x? > >Thanks, > >John >-- >jjf@mind.net >John Fox, Senior Systems Administrator >InfoStructure - http://www.mind.net >Vox: (541)773-5000 / Fax: (541)488-7599 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.8/163 - Release Date: >11/8/2005 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 11:10:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA0A16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F294643D49 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pergesu@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so363904nzo for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:10:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qY5Tx1RuE/R8KDh2R9RMxe4B/xY5Uwr68iwR3Yn/RECxov9BJ30Twi6gopOfAX+BgoQ4ETaqJ5hpTqyQxsvBjWU2/GeShhZxiFpPB1tC9SG1QAwB6u0CZpSGoyb7urWDRkY8CrOyFCZt60YUtrj7pFZ9uN92swLmJszXUgb5SUY= Received: by 10.37.18.8 with SMTP id v8mr432698nzi; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:10:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.47.1 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:10:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <810a540e0511100310s33a8241aj607cbbe23d76d38e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:10:14 -0700 From: Pat Maddox To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: "Out of range" starting Xorg on dual display X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:10:17 -0000 I've got a dual display setup, and it had been working fine once I finally got the config done. They're two displays running off one graphics card, one through the DVI output and one through the D-SUB.=20 Today I had to switch the inputs that the monitors use, and it just doesn't work anymore. I get a message on my left display that says "Out of range." This isn't an Xorg or FreeBSD error, it's a message from the displays built-in HUD. This doesn't make any sense because as far as Xorg is concerned, there shouldn't be any difference. The D-SUB display should be on the left, and the DVI one should be on the right. I really don't understand what could be causing a problem, but for what it's worth, the display now connected to the D-SUB has always been more finicky than my other display. They're a ViewSonic vp201 (D-SUB) and Dell 2001fp (DVI). Here's my config: Section "ServerLayout" =09Identifier "Dual Head" =09Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 =09Screen 1 "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0" =09InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" =09InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" =09 =09Option "Xinerama" "true" =09Option "Clone" "off" EndSection Section "Files" =09RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" =09ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" =09FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" =09FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" =09FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" =09FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" =09FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" =09FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" =09Load "dbe" =09#Load "dri" =09Load "extmod" =09Load "glx" =09Load "record" =09Load "xtrap" =09Load "freetype" =09Load "type1" EndSection Section "InputDevice" =09Identifier "Keyboard0" =09Driver "kbd" EndSection Section "InputDevice" =09Identifier "Mouse0" =09Driver "mouse" =09Option=09 "Protocol" "auto" =09Option=09 "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" =09Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "Monitor" =09Identifier=09"Monitor0" =09VendorName=09"Vendor Name" =09ModelName=09"Model Name" EndSection Section "Device" =09Identifier "Card0" =09Driver "nvidia" =09VendorName "nVidia Corporation" =09BoardName "NV25 [GeForce4 Ti 4600]" =09BusID "PCI:1:0:0" =09Screen 0 =09Option "RenderAccel" "true" =09Option "AllowGLXWithComposite" "true" EndSection Section "Device" =09Identifier "Card1" =09Driver "nvidia" =09VendorName "nVidia Corporation" =09BoardName "NV25 [GeForce4 Ti 4600]" =09BusID "PCI:1:0:0" =09Screen 1 =09Option "RenderAccel" "true" =09Option "AllowGLXWithComposite" "true" EndSection Section "Screen" =09Identifier "Screen0" =09Device "Card0" =09Monitor "Monitor0" =09DefaultDepth 24 =09SubSection "Display" =09=09Viewport 0 0 =09=09Depth 24 =09=09Modes=09"1600x1200" =09EndSubSection EndSection Section "Screen" =09Identifier "Screen1" =09Device "Card1" =09Monitor "Monitor0" =09DefaultDepth 24 =09SubSection "Display" =09=09Viewport 0 0 =09=09Depth 24 =09EndSubSection EndSection From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 11:12:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9BD16A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:12:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahnjoan@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9AD43D5C for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:12:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahnjoan@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so473346wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:12:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l2tPsWYGVrZcQ4FWwDuHtnUxDanVQmD7yKJddG9/C55pGoEBG4QvRAr60o2MPS216uS80v0RtJL7ir7viXm8SV69xpnyBHNcO0TW4Q/MzbG1o5xesiFCpiecHmGAXSbjaNfuJL136n6bMNLyFhXkfzea7QpG53iRpZFtPSCpJ48= Received: by 10.70.100.17 with SMTP id x17mr252899wxb; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.102.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:26:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5e575c8a0511091826s3c24a3adkf8f6acca1c66fd68@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:26:53 -0500 From: Ahnjoan Amous To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com In-Reply-To: <025501c5e57f$90b0f290$c901a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <025501c5e57f$90b0f290$c901a8c0@workdog> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Masquerading Virtual domains in sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:12:57 -0000 On 11/9/05, Gayn Winters wrote: > I'm installing sendmail.8.13.3 on FBSD 5.4 on node.domain1.com. > > I've configured /etc/mail/local-host-names to accept mail for > domain1.com and domain2.com. > > My user names look like bob.domain1.com and (a different Bob) > bob.domain2.com. > > Inside /etc/mail/virtusertable I map > bob@domain1.com bob.domain1.com > bob@domain2.com bob.domain2.com > > Inbound all is well. BUT, > > What I can't figure out is how to masquerade mail from bob.domain1.com > as being from bob@domain1.com AND ALSO HAVE bob.domain2.com masqueraded > as being from bob@domain2.com. > > One test of this working is to be able to register both Bob's in the > FreeBSD mailing lists as bob@domain1.com and bob@domain2.com. > > Ideas? References? > > Thanks, > > -gayn > > Bristol Systems Inc. > 714/532-6776 > www.bristolsystems.com > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Try a google search on "genericstable". I'm not sure if this is exactly what you are looking for as you are trying to send mail via the same username but it is what I use to specify sender domain for different users. Understanding this may not be how you want to solve the issue, you could send as bobA@ and bobB@ and genericstable could translate that to whatever you would like. Ahnjoan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 11:15:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8EA16A423 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:15:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justin.bastedo@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F139143D53 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:15:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justin.bastedo@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so189542wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:15:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eR+JH2m6K101qa83cv3nm+fWwYtL4BFeFieuBMl1O0siq7ERI2EQLP7UurAtQSkJ2OeNPw0MYiT+EwHWF3DXKKp/87D7kZi/GoaZAqdMHwLTiBDvDjb0gpvTXKux0cgqWNUSv0HqoNs8f/lOjKKgm4ZaMa9JdEYJER0Gjh9eRuQ= Received: by 10.70.44.1 with SMTP id r1mr25797wxr; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.36.9 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:16:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8a5255240511091416i449bc233s4706f26c29002284@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:16:50 -0800 From: Justin Bastedo To: NMH In-Reply-To: <20051013043115.4693.qmail@web32913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051013025632.GN49168@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20051013043115.4693.qmail@web32913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD-DataBase , Kris Kennaway , Greg 'groggy' Lehey , questions Subject: Re: Mysql server not able to stay running on anything but Linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:15:18 -0000 Hey everyone, Not trying to beat a dead horse or anything but was wondering if any resolution was found for this on either end. We are about to launch another site and can easily forsee my load getting close to this size within 6 months. Just need to find out any concerns with growth we might have and come up with options. Just trying to plan ahead and keep problems from happening, since I hadn't seen any formal resolution on this thread figured I'd inquire. Thanks everyone Justin Bastedo On 10/12/05, NMH wrote: > --- Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > > Note the From: address. > > > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2005 at 13:16:22 -0700, NMH > > wrote: > > > > > > I am stuck with a delema and I feel like a damn > > troll. But.. I have > > > a Mysql Database that I posted about earlier. It > > seems that it is > > > only able to not die by running on BSD 4.11 with > > Linux Threads. My > > > boss is convinced this means that Linux is better > > for MySQL and > > > wants that installed now. > > > > > > We even got a support contact from Mysql that so > > far has gotten us > > > nothing for almost a month while our production > > database server died > > > up to 3 times a day. (and lots of we're looking > > into it's) > > > > One of the reasons why you haven't got much more > > than "we're looking > > into it"s is because we haven't been able to > > reproduce the problem; > > you acknowledge this in follow-up mail quoted below. > > > > As you know from various threads on the FreeBSD > > lists, including this > > one, the typical answer is "works fine for me". > > That doesn't mean > > that we're not taking your problems seriously, but > > we do have a > > significant issue just reproducing the problem. We > > have a number of > > choices: > > > > 1. Try different hardware or a different version of > > FreeBSD. It's > > conceivable that there's something about your > > specific hardware, > > or about the combination of i386 kernel on amd64 > > in general, that > > triggers the problem. > > > Yes possible. However the same hardware was used for > the earlier version machine that worked fine. IE > Freebsd 5.1-RELEASE-P11 and Mysql 4.0.18 worked on the > same hardware. > > > 2. Do debugging on your production servers. This > > isn't really a > > choice at all: it would involve even more down > > time. > > Yea not really an option. > > > 3. Get you to run a more stable version of FreeBSD > > while we > > investigate the problem. This is the method we > > chose. I haven't > > heard from you since the weekend, so I hope I'm > > correct in > > understanding that you currently don't have > > stability problems. > > On our side, we have installed FreeBSD 5.4 on > > one of our internal > > machines, and we're trying to reproduce the > > problem there. > > So far we have had only one crash that seemed to have > been SCSI related. So far it has not happend again. > One problem with replication that was a coding issue. > > > > > We were running fine but a little slow on FreeBSD > > 5.1-P11 and MySQL > > > 4.0.18.(apperantly before a big Lib change) We had > > to move quicker > > > than we wanted to a new server running FreeBSD 5.4 > > and MySQL 4.11 > > > (becouse of a dual HD death) Under production load > > the new 5.4 > > > server fell over regulary. It has only now become > > stable by wiping > > > it and running it on FreeBSD 4.11 with Linux > > Threads. (it regularly > > > has over 400+ threads) > > > > Kris obviously understood that by this statement you > > meant a kernel > > crash. My understanding is that only the mysqld > > server is crashing. > > Is this still correct? > > Yes only Mysqld would crash. Sometimes brb and > autorestart with minimal damage. Other times it would > die a horrible death and damage tons of data on its > way out. > > > > I want to try FreeBSD 5.4 AMD64 (the machines are > > Opteron) or 6.0 > > > but my boss feels that would be a waste given that > > MYSQL doesn't > > > support Mysql on AMD64 well enough. > > > > I think it would be a good idea to try this. It's > > one of the things > > that we intend to do in-house as soon as we can > > reproduce the problem > > at all. > > Yes however as I pointed out.. Just Trying things on > a production database is not desirable without some > serious indicators that its worthwhile. Last you wrote > you said you doubted that would do anything I believe. > Also support for amd64 based mysql is listed as > Limited. As you said reproducing the problem is the > key. > However as I suggested I would have thought that if > mysql were really into solving the problem, someone > would have requested a login on the box to look at our > queries to see how they are. Are they 60% reads 40% > writes, are they many divergent queries bundled > together.. etc. IE come and see our production > database in action to see what needs to be replicated. > > I haven't seen anything like this. Now I don't know > much but to me if I can't replicate something it's > becouse I don't know enough about it. > > > > Can anyone help or offer assistance to help track > > this down? Perhaps > > > also any annecdotes or examples I can show my boss > > that other people > > > have as busy MYSQL databases on BSD 5.X. We paid > > 3K to Mysql for > > > help and so far they have been unable to offer any > > clues as to why > > > ours will not stay stable on anything but Linux > > threads. > > > > Have you had any kind of crash under 4.x? I don't > > think that the > > issue is so much linuxthreads as 5.x. > > Well. > 5.1.. Old lib style No crashes > 5.4 .. Crashes like mad > 5.4 with libmap.conf to other threads works better.. > 4.11 with Linux threads.. No Crashes. > > So yea.. But thats the other issue that makes it > hard. Is it Mysql or is it Freebsd or the interaction > and memory sharing going on. I hope that someone here > who deals with these things might actually read these > emails. Its just very frustrating. > > > > As I say I only manage the server, I don't program > > the databases. Is > > > there anything I should/could look for database > > wise that could > > > trigger such things? > > > > So far we've had the machine up in-house and have > > not reproduced the > > problem. If you have a spare machine that we could > > run under more > > typical conditions on your premises, this might > > help. > > We have one machine still running 5.4. But what to do > with it? I would love to convert it to amd64 but we > need some machine to still 5.4 so we can have > something to test. > > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2005 at 17:07:57 -0400, > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > Unfortunately you'll need to provide details of > > how it "fell over" > > > (e.g. panic messages + backtraces). > > I didn't see this email. > We did supply all that to you (greg and Mysql) as far > as I know. If you could share what is needed that > would be appreciatted. > > > > As I mention above, I think this is only a server > > crash. I mentioned > > this on the list a couple of weeks ago: all the > > backtraces I have seen > > have been a SIGSEGV out of mutex_unlock_common. > > Your opinion on this given what you have seen of our > issue? > > > >> Can anyone help or offer assistance to help track > > this down? > > >> Perhaps also any annecdotes or examples I can > > show my boss that > > >> other people have as busy MYSQL databases on BSD > > 5.X. We paid 3K to > > >> Mysql for help and so far they have been unable > > to offer any clues > > >> as to why ours will not stay stable on anything > > but Linux > > >> threads. I feel really sad that so far no one has > > responded to my > > >> posts and it feels like a victory for linux. > > > > > > If I was your boss I'd be asking why mysql hasn't > > delivered on their > > > support contract. > > > > Indeed. I think we have, though. There's a certain > > class of bugs > > which are almost impossible to fix because they're > > so hard to chase > > down. This is one of them. > > Lucky us. :( > But does that also mean that anyone else running 5.4 > and Mysql will likely run into this when they reach > our level of activity? > > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2005 at 14:41:54 -0700, NMH > > wrote: > > > --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > >> If I was your boss I'd be asking why mysql hasn't > > delivered on > > >> their support contract. > > > > > > > > Well I think support has many meanings. I decided > > to look at what he > > > paid for and it says: > > > We get "access" to the mysql devlopers... > > > We get "access" to certified binaries. (none of > > which > > > are FreeBSD) > > > > > > So, sad as it may seem, if your running on > > FreeBSD, $3000.00 buys > > > you someone to talk to. It doesn't mean they have > > to say anything > > > meaningful back or within any reasonable time. :( > > > > We try to handle all problems within a reasonable > > time. The fact that > > you're running FreeBSD does mean that you don't get > > certified > > binaries, but that's the only drawback. And the > > fact that the time > > for this problem has been unreasonable has nothing > > to do with the fact > > you're running FreeBSD: it's because it's a bugger > > to track down. > > Right. Which is why I am here. Hoping to widing the > audience and ask for help rather than having to switch > to Linux to get this solved. I didn't see you posting > anything to ask others so I thought I would. As I said > sometimes the gift and curse of FreeBSD is most of its > users not needing or relying on commercial support for > hardware and software things. So we can be overlooked > as a market. > > Greg. if you wouldn't mind sharing the info with Kris > I would appreciate it. If there is anything else > needed just ask. > > > Be well! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 11:48:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38FA16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@firebadger.net) Received: from mail.firebadger.net (82-69-4-157.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.4.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4F4A43D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:48:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@firebadger.net) Received: (qmail 37908 invoked by uid 1011); 10 Nov 2005 10:47:16 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by brian.firebadger.net (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.86.2/1038. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.147636 secs); 10 Nov 2005 10:47:16 -0000 X-Antivirus-FIREBADGER-Mail-From: richard@firebadger.net via brian.firebadger.net X-Antivirus-FIREBADGER: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.147636 secs Process 37902) Received: from localhost (HELO www.firebadger.net) (richard@firebadger.net@127.0.0.1) by mail.firebadger.net with SMTP; 10 Nov 2005 10:47:16 -0000 Received: from 83.146.34.219 (SquirrelMail authenticated user richard@firebadger.net) by www.firebadger.net with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:47:16 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <52320.83.146.34.219.1131619636.squirrel@www.firebadger.net> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:47:16 -0000 (GMT) From: "Richard Collyer" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Upgrading to 6.0 - Would this backup strategy work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:48:29 -0000 Hello, I'm thinking of upgrading my 5.4 box to 6.0 mainly becuase I've never done a buildworld I've always installed a fresh. The box is not production quality just something for me to learn BSD on. I have a 7006-2 3ware raid controller miroring on 2 drives. If I was to remove one of the drives and then do the upgrade if the upgrade was successful I could put the other drive in a build the array again. If it failedi could use the old drive to rebuild a working system quickly. Anyone see any issues with this? Cheers Richard -- Richard Collyer richard@firebadger.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 12:02:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C3716A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:02:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28A043D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:02:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so366647nzo for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:02:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GQjxWbW/v61416HMWuVJiHCXAppHuDrL7djv/56Dl3A8TCZ1lNQcaTN3fcjvKjYmh0EGD3SfZoS0orz/fSNLg2WjvJwuN1derq/9bSXnbHjF/duVotaL8VXnX+Q+1ZLot90pAZ45ShsYGtYNVcJTxK3jXl4zKOGADcsCAMR/m80= Received: by 10.37.15.74 with SMTP id s74mr470907nzi; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:02:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:02:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:02:35 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Luis?= In-Reply-To: <43732EA0.5030000@jonny.eng.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43732EA0.5030000@jonny.eng.br> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: After 6.0-RELEASE, still cannot find ATA disk com VIA8235 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:02:36 -0000 On 11/10/05, Jo=E3o Carlos Mendes Luis wrote: > Hi, > > After 5.4-RELEASE I did try to install FreeBSD on a spare desktop at= work, > but it failed to boot, with a kernel trap 12 and ATA_IDENTIFY time out. > > Knowning that 6.0 has a completely new ata driver, I did it again. = Now the > system boots, and shows absolutely no error message. But also could not > identify neither the Samsung Hard disk, nor the CDROM on the VIA8235 ata = interface. > > This same machine is running Fedora Core 3 and Windows XP SP2 perfec= tly. > Indeedm this email is comming out from it, over Windows XP. > > The motherboard is an ASUS P4VP-MX, with a 2.0GHz P4 CPU, and 1G RAM= . The > harddisk is a Samsung SP0411N, on primary master, and the CDROM is an LG > GCR-8523B, on secondary slave. I also did try with a DVD-writer on secon= dary > master, with no success. > > Any ideas? > > TIA, > > Jonny > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Please, do some research (googling) before asking such questions, as they usually require much more info. Your motherboard has VIA P4M266A chipset, carrying VT8233A on board. Ata(4) driver is not completely new in 6.0, and it has supported this very IDE controller for some time already. Please consult your motherboard's manual (I can't download it as all Asus sites behave very badly) and disable all non-standard options, you can try some thing like "Load safe defaults" or "Load optimized defaults". BTW, this question belongs to questions@, so cc there. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 12:10:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9B516A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:10:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from blake.darche@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA2C43D5E for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from blake.darche@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so206487wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:10:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JcCybKsWfMsTmPshnvLq7+9OQVPxKKVz0FamEL1Lg5oDo85DdKrs7BCjvds7ZR4wM7ccqwDvQdydjyCJejSzctPeIGgPD19/tqM0uR6/yxF/1+VEqCqeZWjlrLcYaEGy4unEThKFyxq7UKTD7thxCNMqgZjOhMZqZOETpBtdUBs= Received: by 10.70.44.1 with SMTP id r1mr321899wxr; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:53:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.40.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:53:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <287fd0790511092053o26484e88s69305cd6d7f0099c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:53:17 -0500 From: Blake Darche To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20051109220901.GA22021@dementia.beyondnormal.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051109220901.GA22021@dementia.beyondnormal.net> Subject: Re: Good idea or Bad idea? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:10:40 -0000 -fomit-frame-pointer IS EVIL. Do not use it. portupgrade won't build with it, cause ruby hates -fomit-frame-pointer. I would just do a fresh binary install. 6.0 is quite an amazing release... The speed is remarkable. My machine goes way faster than it did before. I am using the following CFLAGS successfully with xorg and XFCE4: CFLAGS=3D-O2 -pipe -ffast-math CPUTYPE=3Dp4 I can't speak to building FreeBSD from source. I build all my ports from source, but didn't bother building the world from source... On 11/9/05, Mike Hernandez wrote: > Hello all! > > I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 now, and of course I'm thinking about my upgrade > to 6.0. What I'm wondering is if it's a Good Idea or a Bad Idea (tm) to > build everything from source. I have experience building linux from scrat= ch > (linuxfromscratch.org) and I have learned that sometimes it's just a bett= er > idea to use binary packages (i.e. building everything from source can be > a waste of time if there is no performance gain, and it's easy to screw u= p.) > > I have no trouble following docs, so I'm not really worried about blowing > everything up in the process (even though I might haha...) I'm just wonde= ring > if there are any real (noticeable) performance increases if I build my ke= rnel > and base system from source. Of course either way my ports will be compil= ed. > > Any feedback is appreciated - especially in regards to {C,XX}FLAGS and ev= en > more appreciated in the case of "DO NOT USE -br34k-all when compiling __"= ;) > I've had my share of "oops I guess ____ didn't like -fomit-frame-pointer"= in > the past with linux ;) > > Thanks! > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 12:17:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80EE16A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:17:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zparta@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E29443D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:17:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zparta@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so374811nzo for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:17:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IWsRtsawmVda+etYccr2F0AOxBDQ4OVkFSgMotn2zeHgAf9dX7+5FmsProSTlnsHB8SL5lE1zxDlnCbs6oiHu58gMgba7v6w3MmcTNJt8+IvKhh2c9x4YwBaIAIi3B8wxrtkzbmnaMQxOhnYXxOdbYgu+uHJn8AnmNqsfx/83kA= Received: by 10.36.221.32 with SMTP id t32mr457605nzg; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:17:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.18.50 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:17:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3b41db850511100417u542c24e0q935af89f9ba78582@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:17:07 +0100 From: Jens Holmqvist To: Justin Bastedo In-Reply-To: <8a5255240511091416i449bc233s4706f26c29002284@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20051013025632.GN49168@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20051013043115.4693.qmail@web32913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <8a5255240511091416i449bc233s4706f26c29002284@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD-DataBase , NMH , questions Subject: Re: Mysql server not able to stay running on anything but Linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:17:10 -0000 On 11/9/05, Justin Bastedo wrote: > > Hey everyone, > Not trying to beat a dead horse or anything but was wondering if any > resolution was found for this on either end. We are about to launch > another site and can easily forsee my load getting close to this size > within 6 months. Just need to find out any concerns with growth we > might have and come up with options. > > Just trying to plan ahead and keep problems from happening, since I > hadn't seen any formal resolution on this thread figured I'd inquire. > > Thanks everyone > > Justin Bastedo > > On 10/12/05, NMH wrote: > > --- Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > > > > Note the From: address. > > > > > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2005 at 13:16:22 -0700, NMH > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I am stuck with a delema and I feel like a damn > > > troll. But.. I have > > > > a Mysql Database that I posted about earlier. It > > > seems that it is > > > > only able to not die by running on BSD 4.11 with > > > Linux Threads. My > > > > boss is convinced this means that Linux is better > > > for MySQL and > > > > wants that installed now. > > > > > > > > We even got a support contact from Mysql that so > > > far has gotten us > > > > nothing for almost a month while our production > > > database server died > > > > up to 3 times a day. (and lots of we're looking > > > into it's) > > > > > > One of the reasons why you haven't got much more > > > than "we're looking > > > into it"s is because we haven't been able to > > > reproduce the problem; > > > you acknowledge this in follow-up mail quoted below. > > > > > > As you know from various threads on the FreeBSD > > > lists, including this > > > one, the typical answer is "works fine for me". > > > That doesn't mean > > > that we're not taking your problems seriously, but > > > we do have a > > > significant issue just reproducing the problem. We > > > have a number of > > > choices: > > > > > > 1. Try different hardware or a different version of > > > FreeBSD. It's > > > conceivable that there's something about your > > > specific hardware, > > > or about the combination of i386 kernel on amd64 > > > in general, that > > > triggers the problem. > > > > > > Yes possible. However the same hardware was used for > > the earlier version machine that worked fine. IE > > Freebsd 5.1-RELEASE-P11 and Mysql 4.0.18 worked on the > > same hardware. > > > > > 2. Do debugging on your production servers. This > > > isn't really a > > > choice at all: it would involve even more down > > > time. > > > > Yea not really an option. > > > > > 3. Get you to run a more stable version of FreeBSD > > > while we > > > investigate the problem. This is the method we > > > chose. I haven't > > > heard from you since the weekend, so I hope I'm > > > correct in > > > understanding that you currently don't have > > > stability problems. > > > On our side, we have installed FreeBSD 5.4 on > > > one of our internal > > > machines, and we're trying to reproduce the > > > problem there. > > > > So far we have had only one crash that seemed to have > > been SCSI related. So far it has not happend again. > > One problem with replication that was a coding issue. > > > > > > > > We were running fine but a little slow on FreeBSD > > > 5.1-P11 and MySQL > > > > 4.0.18.(apperantly before a big Lib change) We had > > > to move quicker > > > > than we wanted to a new server running FreeBSD 5.4 > > > and MySQL 4.11 > > > > (becouse of a dual HD death) Under production load > > > the new 5.4 > > > > server fell over regulary. It has only now become > > > stable by wiping > > > > it and running it on FreeBSD 4.11 with Linux > > > Threads. (it regularly > > > > has over 400+ threads) > > > > > > Kris obviously understood that by this statement you > > > meant a kernel > > > crash. My understanding is that only the mysqld > > > server is crashing. > > > Is this still correct? > > > > Yes only Mysqld would crash. Sometimes brb and > > autorestart with minimal damage. Other times it would > > die a horrible death and damage tons of data on its > > way out. > > > > > > I want to try FreeBSD 5.4 AMD64 (the machines are > > > Opteron) or 6.0 > > > > but my boss feels that would be a waste given that > > > MYSQL doesn't > > > > support Mysql on AMD64 well enough. > > > > > > I think it would be a good idea to try this. It's > > > one of the things > > > that we intend to do in-house as soon as we can > > > reproduce the problem > > > at all. > > > > Yes however as I pointed out.. Just Trying things on > > a production database is not desirable without some > > serious indicators that its worthwhile. Last you wrote > > you said you doubted that would do anything I believe. > > Also support for amd64 based mysql is listed as > > Limited. As you said reproducing the problem is the > > key. > > However as I suggested I would have thought that if > > mysql were really into solving the problem, someone > > would have requested a login on the box to look at our > > queries to see how they are. Are they 60% reads 40% > > writes, are they many divergent queries bundled > > together.. etc. IE come and see our production > > database in action to see what needs to be replicated. > > > > I haven't seen anything like this. Now I don't know > > much but to me if I can't replicate something it's > > becouse I don't know enough about it. > > > > > > Can anyone help or offer assistance to help track > > > this down? Perhaps > > > > also any annecdotes or examples I can show my boss > > > that other people > > > > have as busy MYSQL databases on BSD 5.X. We paid > > > 3K to Mysql for > > > > help and so far they have been unable to offer any > > > clues as to why > > > > ours will not stay stable on anything but Linux > > > threads. > > > > > > Have you had any kind of crash under 4.x? I don't > > > think that the > > > issue is so much linuxthreads as 5.x. > > > > Well. > > 5.1.. Old lib style No crashes > > 5.4 .. Crashes like mad > > 5.4 with libmap.conf to other threads works better.. > > 4.11 with Linux threads.. No Crashes. > > > > So yea.. But thats the other issue that makes it > > hard. Is it Mysql or is it Freebsd or the interaction > > and memory sharing going on. I hope that someone here > > who deals with these things might actually read these > > emails. Its just very frustrating. > > > > > > As I say I only manage the server, I don't program > > > the databases. Is > > > > there anything I should/could look for database > > > wise that could > > > > trigger such things? > > > > > > So far we've had the machine up in-house and have > > > not reproduced the > > > problem. If you have a spare machine that we could > > > run under more > > > typical conditions on your premises, this might > > > help. > > > > We have one machine still running 5.4. But what to do > > with it? I would love to convert it to amd64 but we > > need some machine to still 5.4 so we can have > > something to test. > > > > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2005 at 17:07:57 -0400, > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > > Unfortunately you'll need to provide details of > > > how it "fell over" > > > > (e.g. panic messages + backtraces). > > > > I didn't see this email. > > We did supply all that to you (greg and Mysql) as far > > as I know. If you could share what is needed that > > would be appreciatted. > > > > > > > As I mention above, I think this is only a server > > > crash. I mentioned > > > this on the list a couple of weeks ago: all the > > > backtraces I have seen > > > have been a SIGSEGV out of mutex_unlock_common. > > > > Your opinion on this given what you have seen of our > > issue? > > > > > >> Can anyone help or offer assistance to help track > > > this down? > > > >> Perhaps also any annecdotes or examples I can > > > show my boss that > > > >> other people have as busy MYSQL databases on BSD > > > 5.X. We paid 3K to > > > >> Mysql for help and so far they have been unable > > > to offer any clues > > > >> as to why ours will not stay stable on anything > > > but Linux > > > >> threads. I feel really sad that so far no one has > > > responded to my > > > >> posts and it feels like a victory for linux. > > > > > > > > If I was your boss I'd be asking why mysql hasn't > > > delivered on their > > > > support contract. > > > > > > Indeed. I think we have, though. There's a certain > > > class of bugs > > > which are almost impossible to fix because they're > > > so hard to chase > > > down. This is one of them. > > > > Lucky us. :( > > But does that also mean that anyone else running 5.4 > > and Mysql will likely run into this when they reach > > our level of activity? > > > > > On Wednesday, 12 October 2005 at 14:41:54 -0700, NMH > > > wrote: > > > > --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > >> If I was your boss I'd be asking why mysql hasn't > > > delivered on > > > >> their support contract. > > > > > > > > > > > Well I think support has many meanings. I decided > > > to look at what he > > > > paid for and it says: > > > > We get "access" to the mysql devlopers... > > > > We get "access" to certified binaries. (none of > > > which > > > > are FreeBSD) > > > > > > > > So, sad as it may seem, if your running on > > > FreeBSD, $3000.00 buys > > > > you someone to talk to. It doesn't mean they have > > > to say anything > > > > meaningful back or within any reasonable time. :( > > > > > > We try to handle all problems within a reasonable > > > time. The fact that > > > you're running FreeBSD does mean that you don't get > > > certified > > > binaries, but that's the only drawback. And the > > > fact that the time > > > for this problem has been unreasonable has nothing > > > to do with the fact > > > you're running FreeBSD: it's because it's a bugger > > > to track down. > > > > Right. Which is why I am here. Hoping to widing the > > audience and ask for help rather than having to switch > > to Linux to get this solved. I didn't see you posting > > anything to ask others so I thought I would. As I said > > sometimes the gift and curse of FreeBSD is most of its > > users not needing or relying on commercial support for > > hardware and software things. So we can be overlooked > > as a market. > > > > Greg. if you wouldn't mind sharing the info with Kris > > I would appreciate it. If there is anything else > > needed just ask. > > > > > > Be well! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" if you are using mysql from the ports you might wanna try to compile it wit= h the option "WITH_LINUXTHREADS=3Dyes" and if you are already using that option try it without and we cant say for sure what the problem is if you dont give use an output of 'gdb' with 'backtrace' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 23:04:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4B216A41F for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:04:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from costadragon220@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay106-f34.bay106.hotmail.com [65.54.161.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256A543D4C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:04:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from costadragon220@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:04:09 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.161.200 by by106fd.bay106.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:04:09 GMT X-Originating-IP: [69.118.31.58] X-Originating-Email: [costadragon220@hotmail.com] X-Sender: costadragon220@hotmail.com From: "Christian Delgado" To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:04:09 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2005 23:04:09.0879 (UTC) FILETIME=[E49A5A70:01C5E581] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:25:48 +0000 Cc: Subject: Searching for Aureal A3D Demos & AUREAL Vortex AU8830 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:04:10 -0000 Hello- I am trying to fix my computer. It's audio has not been working and sound can not be heard on any application except ONLY when windows is starting up.I am hoping by downloading this application will fix the problem. However I am unable to download it. Can you send instructions on how to download it . Thank you. _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 12:36:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5209716A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:36:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3D643D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:36:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t10so656515wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:36:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Y/0Y4batqARJqS6agaJiPhOGizNGH/eYSRbgWGgpCNnsAEfjeIw8J1LYq9QLTVJoUmSpyP+T0CuT1Zar/mNCceIc65YhTCV3cqsqxk1ohObHAzAFrWPEOO9zufINxUnEzusPzbwx/Yl34O5tMWeasQJpN0NL0HfbNMmCUXxZ7uI= Received: by 10.64.251.20 with SMTP id y20mr1197672qbh; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:23:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.10? ( [71.102.14.129]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q16sm5960860qbq.2005.11.09.11.23.31; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:23:31 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:14:54 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> <200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511091114.55355.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:36:31 -0000 On Wednesday 09 November 2005 11:13, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote: > > If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do > > it. > > Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10 > times the changes? > > Anyway, I've fallen in love with portsnap. Is there any reason in the > world why a normal user (eg one that doesn't need to fetch a version of > ports from a specific date or tag) shouldn't completely switch to portsnap > today? One thing I noticed about portsnap that is either a "feature" or not is it doesn't catch changes you make in the tree. For example if you modify a port's Makefile and that port isn't part of the update it won't change, with cvsup it will. For setting up a new, clean port tree portsnap is wonderful, much faster than cvsup and probably way easier on the servers as well. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 13:03:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F4516A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:03:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2E843D48 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAAD3BEf094033 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:03:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 62E0AB84D; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:03:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:03:11 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051110130311.GC42080@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: usb flashdrive not working on 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:03:14 -0000 --Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, After my old flashdrive broke down, I bought a new one and updated my machine to 6.0-STABLE (amd64). The new flashdrive is not recognized when I plug it in. There is no reaction whatsoever from the usb subsystem. This is the flash drive in question: http://www.supermediastore.com/pqi-cool-drive-256mb-usb-20-usb-flash-drive.= html I have uhci, usb, umass, scbus, pass and da built into the kernel; uhci0: port 0xc400-0xc41f irq 21 at device 16.0= on p ci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xc800-0xc81f irq 21 at device 16.1= on p ci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 21 at device 16.2= on p ci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 21 at device 16.3= on p ci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered I do get a funny message about a device without a driver: pci0: at device 16.4 (no driver attached) But I suspect that is the USB 2.0 device, which isn't recognized because I don't have ehci in my kernel. When I plug in a SDDR-31 CompactFlash card reader, everything works: umass0: SanDisk Corporation ImageMate CompactFlash USB, rev 1.10/0.09, addr= 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device=20 da0: 1.000MB/s transfers da0: 61MB (125441 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 61C) (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 1 ea 0 0 0 1 0=20 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): MEDIUM ERROR asc:0,0 (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): No additional sense information (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) The messages notwithstanding, I can mount the CF card just fine. So I think the usb subsystem works fine. My precious flash drive (apacer) also worked without problems.=20 Can anybody shed some light on this? Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDc0UPEnfvsMMhpyURAmAAAKCfvZjvzjx7nQmqKywXTVK611GyWACfZTro CiTz+HwkTsHDUBZ7MgkNjeY= =UhTe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 14:25:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C7316A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4AD43D64 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:25:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxsec@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t10so694919wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:25:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=X2ZuLymfb3Gxen3hybInl4b0LHWyQ6MylB5MfqOmefNiHAkpn8XTG7DXOk21HQkNOgc35NMktslfHgqbWs4qTrih0mHYagnU24vhWCwe9+BRkSAlfFQ+quw6/lz6yyCt/ApW41qOSe5Koc8a3tDh8/bjqRftmlFMrcmqznWLM5U= Received: by 10.64.131.4 with SMTP id e4mr45226qbd; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:41:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.213.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:41:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <72cf361e0511091441p2b4fadb7g4e3a77295e99f99c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 22:41:50 +0000 From: Martin Hepworth To: Fatman In-Reply-To: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2e5ed0aa0511070019t49275f07h489cf0fea4161ab8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Antivir for mail server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:25:47 -0000 Hi I use Clam-AV and Sophos at work on the email gateway (a MailScanner implementation). -- Martin On 11/7/05, Fatman wrote: > > I'm doubting about to install CLAM or DR.WEB antivir in the mail server. > > What do you advise to me? > > thnkx. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 14:29:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B1716A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:29:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahnjoan@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671C343D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:29:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahnjoan@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so521848wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:29:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hjGC9VG9E55FlK4XiXrJW0wpJef80zhnfxCpeuGfhNI0kXzZIAWMFBq5si6FDjfIE/bwLQJF74ZQw5tM7MIXGX+biI/KG/O2sfBVqDf1HI0HBRdGPYkznHpSkhCGIxvWRJt5J87s9nHOHT8om+1c6yacly+/JhbzfhlIL09CLvw= Received: by 10.70.65.8 with SMTP id n8mr220742wxa; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:37:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.102.7 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:37:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5e575c8a0511091737j3c387ffbnef38d5a8cbdd64e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:37:26 -0500 From: Ahnjoan Amous To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Incorrectly followed steps to re-sync vinum subdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:29:27 -0000 Tonight while checking a few things on my personal machine I noticed that one of my vinum sub disks was stale. Included below are the steps I took attempting to remedy this. Clearly I did not follow the proper procedures and now the volume is un-mountable. Currently when I attempt to mount the /export filesystem the machine panics and reboots. My apologies in advance for the length of information included. I include it so that it might aid in recovery of the data on this filesystem. It has been cleaned up a bit but am happy to provide the full output with the multiple "help" command output.=20 Shortly after the command sequence included the machine rebooted.=20 Since then I have booted in to single user mode and commented out /export from fstab. The machine is fully functioning with the exception of the important data on /export. If anyone doesn't believe I will be able to recover the data on my own but does know of a company that might be able to recover data written on a vinum mirror would you send me their name? Thank you Ahnjoan root@bigbox:~ > df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/vinum/root 1012974 61138 870800 7% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/vinum/var 1012974 355886 576052 38% /var /dev/vinum/crash 2026030 6 1863942 0% /var/crash /dev/vinum/tmp 1012974 16 931922 0% /tmp /dev/vinum/usr 8122126 4714322 2758034 63% /usr /dev/vinum/home 4058062 6922 3726496 0% /home /dev/vinum/tmp1 50777034 35262392 11452480 75% /export procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc devfs 1 1 0 100% /var/db/dhcpd/dev ##################################################################### root@bigbox:~ > vinum list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: stale D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ##################################################################### root@bigbox:~ > vinum vinum -> detach tmp1.p0.s0 ##################################################################### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: stale D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ##################################################################### vinum -> start tmp1.p0.s0 Can't start tmp1.p0.s0: Invalid argument (22) ##################################################################### vinum -> start ** no additional drives found: No such file or directory Can't save Vinum config: No child processes ##################################################################### vinum -> start tmp1.p0.s0 Can't start tmp1.p0.s0: Invalid argument (22) ##################################################################### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: R 0% D: been Size: 50 GB *** Start tmp1.p0.s0 with 'start' command *** S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ##################################################################### vinum -> stop tmp1.p0.s0 ##################################################################### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: down D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ##################################################################### vinum -> start tmp1.p0.s0 Can't start tmp1.p0.s0: Device busy (16) ##################################################################### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: reborn D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ##################################################################### vinum -> stop tmp1.p0.s0 ##################################################################### vinum -> setstate obsolete tmp1.p0.s0 ##################################################################### vinum -> start tmp1.p0.s0 ##################################################################### vinum -> list 2 drives: D been State: up /dev/ad2s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) D evie State: up /dev/ad0s1h A: 7739/76347 MB (1= 0%) 7 volumes: V root State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V var State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V crash State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 2048 MB V tmp State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 1024 MB V usr State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8192 MB V home State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 4096 MB V tmp1 State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 50 GB 14 plexes: P root.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p0 C State: faulty Subdisks: 0 Size: 0 B P root.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P var.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P crash.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 2048 MB P tmp.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 1024 MB P usr.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8192 MB P home.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 4096 MB P tmp1.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 50 GB 14 subdisks: S root.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S var.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S crash.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 1024 MB S usr.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 8192 MB S home.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p0.s0 State: up D: been Size: 50 GB S root.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S var.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S crash.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 2048 MB S tmp.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 1024 MB S usr.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 8192 MB S home.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 4096 MB S tmp1.p1.s0 State: up D: evie Size: 50 GB ##################################################################### vinum -> quit ##################################################################### root@bigbox:~ > cd /export ##################################################################### root@bigbox:/export > ls .snap archive CRASH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 14:47:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08EC16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:47:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CB043D48 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:47:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so399523nzo for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:47:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gBCF4Iegg3zcLqOdCYo6jqh70dFLKpDAEHvfKCr3QfZH5SPlc4ziz4aeq+Ixx5CUvEidOfdPATS4CR5UB7GvLUZEAHMhA9aeOoW/webh6M7H/bSy/8ReKX+uOMEmLjbe7cl7oYW37/AqO9XySiO7Gkq3sL5x9GhQ9tATl/DA1Ag= Received: by 10.37.15.74 with SMTP id s74mr569936nzi; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:47:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:47:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:47:32 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <43725078.6000303@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com> <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> <200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> <43725078.6000303@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:47:34 -0000 On 11/9/05, Colin Percival wrote: > Kirk Strauser wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote: > >>If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't = do > >>it. > > > > Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with= 10 > > times the changes? > > Yes. Each time you run CVSup, it transmits a list of all the files in th= e > tree; if your ports tree is almost up-to-date already, then this "overhea= d" > cost is in fact the largest contributor to the bandwidth used. This prob= lem > does not occur with portsnap to any significant extent; updating once an = hour > uses less than 1% extra bandwidth compared to updating every day. > > > Anyway, I've fallen in love with portsnap. Is there any reason in the = world > > why a normal user (eg one that doesn't need to fetch a version of ports > > from a specific date or tag) shouldn't completely switch to portsnap to= day? > > The other common reason for being unable to use portsnap is if a user has= made > their own personal changes to a port (e.g., an added patch). Portsnap wi= ll > remove such changes the next time the port is updated, while cvs will att= empt > to merge the modifications. > > Colin Percival > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > There are a couple more points against portsnap: - it lags behind by a few hours. - setting up a mirror is still undocumented Both issues are purely technical, and hopefully will be dealt with soon. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 14:56:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AA516A41F; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:56:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF8B43D48; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:56:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629781CD6E; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:56:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08141CD4F; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:56:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:55:52 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1176299575.20051110155552@rulez.sk> To: "Andrew P." In-Reply-To: References: <200511091224.13143.kirk@strauser.com> <200511091044.04253.kstewart@owt.com> <200511091313.50741.kirk@strauser.com> <43725078.6000303@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="----------661C921A37A90064" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.830, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -3.569 X-Spam-Level: X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Colin Percival Subject: Re[2]: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:56:44 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. ------------661C921A37A90064 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Szia Andrew, Thursday, November 10, 2005, 3:47:32 PM, you wrote: > There are a couple more points against portsnap: > - it lags behind by a few hours. Actually, even cvsup is behind by a few hours, if you are not syncing agains cvsup-master (to which only official cvsup mirrors have access, and maybe even not all of them :)) so it depends on how often is your cvsup-mirror beeing sinced. > - setting up a mirror is still undocumented --=20 Sincerely, Daniel Gerzo ------------661C921A37A90064-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 15:12:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620B216A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:12:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A0343D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:12:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 99803 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2005 15:13:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 2005 15:13:21 -0000 Message-ID: <4373639A.30506@123.com.sv> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:13:30 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: HP DL380 hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:12:31 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >try to boot 6.0 with acpi disabled > >Ted > > Ok, i will try that, is this thing (ACPI) really needed, i mean, what harm will cause disable it, i have googled around and the frecuent answer is "try with ACPI disabled", is this support a bleeding edge future?, is its current status STABLE? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 15:21:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D00816A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1C143D46 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so407485nzo for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:20:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=drp5e3NPKEt1q6OSTSkGOku99wJ5Fa0bPcW3WgFz3TZanS5mYK9QHd/CRTniv127B2o1u/NU5IKSHkelizOoxU072VG4Z9oZfdzXU7StzRyoZILBha0rmsmgtGJjCpNT7DJxUcb3KVnY16RcKutT4GD4DKynjXiMCGLvt3akx1g= Received: by 10.36.3.15 with SMTP id 15mr599615nzc; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.33 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:20:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:20:38 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Miguel In-Reply-To: <4373639A.30506@123.com.sv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4373639A.30506@123.com.sv> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: HP DL380 hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:21:12 -0000 On 11/10/05, Miguel wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >try to boot 6.0 with acpi disabled > > > >Ted > > > > > Ok, i will try that, is this thing (ACPI) really needed, i mean, what > harm will cause disable it, i have googled around and the frecuent > answer is "try with ACPI disabled", is this support a bleeding edge > future?, is its current status STABLE? > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Try to disable ACPI in BIOS, too, if an option is there. Nowadays ACPI is not only for power management, so it's nice to have it enabled on a server, but it's not critical. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 15:35:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C8C16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:35:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A8443D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:35:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 7B9BF31360; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:35:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:35:43 -0500 (EST) From: user To: "francisco@natserv.net" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I chroot rsync like I chroot ftp ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:35:45 -0000 On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, francisco@natserv.net wrote: > user writes: > > > What is the equivalent mechanism for rsync ? > > > I have not used it myself, but was looking at rssh tonight. There is also a > program, not in the ports, called scopy or something of the like. > > Check the rssh port in the /usr/pots tree.. go to their web page. The > mention the URL for the other program. > > I am looking to do the same thing, chroot rsync, so will be looking at those > two options I mentioned above in coming days. scponly is another restricted shell like rssh. It is under more active development, and seems to have more features. It's in the ports tree under shells. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 15:36:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C02A16A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:36:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aekelly@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDD143D55 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:36:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aekelly@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so276036wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:36:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uc747SiPVkGFXM8VVf5pK3BTq0MGOZwcTfX2006ZVkE6Wwd+PhVeqHCgSAc/VOKi7Wt+rNQPzm00O6Z3gRUb0arE2CeKR8/iuvI74qz2e9xBKUYcgVLzK+eEArQJqgdsoIVp3mMV18TkNo2dmL0XxAVAg9AdZoGjIXnb+gsQndk= Received: by 10.70.11.2 with SMTP id 2mr981673wxk; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:05:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.45.14 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:05:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <31a749ec0511090905t3a6c260u6716b5382047d731@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:05:05 -0500 From: Alex Kelly To: Steve Bertrand In-Reply-To: <20051109165734.2DCFE43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051109162442.EB40843D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20051109165734.2DCFE43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Ewald Jenisch Subject: Re: Kernel build failed in/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers/viapm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:36:48 -0000 I learned to use diff recently, so that I could submit a patch with a pr. It's handy. On 11/9/05, Steve Bertrand wrote: > > > > > While compiling a fresh kernel for a 5.4 system cvsup-ed as > > > per today > > > > the build process ran into a stop with the exact messages below. > > > > Please note that "make buildworld" completed without any > > > errors only > > > > "make buildkernel kernconf=3DEJ-SMP" died. > > > > > > > > Also tried to cleanup everything (i.e. remove /usr/obj/* > > as per the > > > > Handbook) and starting a fresh "make buildworld" followed > > by "make > > > > buildkernel" but the errors remained. > > > > > > My email from earlier with the subject: > > > > > > "viapm module failing during buildkernel" > > > > > > will confirm that this is two of us experiencing the EXACT > > same issue. > > > > > > I haven't found a workaround yet. My next try will be disabling SMP > > > support. I'll let you know if this works or not. Otherwise, > > I'm on the > > > hunt for how to disable building of this module. > > > > Here is what I am trying now (please disregard wrap). > > > > # rm -rvf > > /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SQL/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/contr > > ollers/via > > pm > > > > # cd /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/controllers > > # mv viapm /home/steve/usr.src.sys.modules.i2c.controllers.viapm > > > > # ee Makefile > > ...then I deleted the viapm entry under SUBDIR, and saved the file > > > > # cd /usr/src > > # make buildkernel > > > > I know that moving the directory was probably redundant, but > > nonetheless...it's running now. I'll post back with findings. > > After doing the above: > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Kernel build for SQL completed on Wed Nov 9 11:47:15 EST 2005 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > [1] Done make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DSQL > > ..now, I am going to install it. However, this is going to be a great > time for me to get more familiar with diff, and compare source from > previous version to find out what exactly broke. > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 15:40:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C2716A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:40:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208AA43D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5502B13A869 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:40:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp08632294pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36A32FD944 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:40:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EaEWz-0002Mz-00 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:40:05 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:40:05 -0500 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20051110154005.GA8382@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 10:24:21 up 4 days, 22:57, 3 users, load average: 0.25, 0.27, 0.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: multiple wireless networks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:40:08 -0000 I just got the wireless network card working in FreeVSD 4 laptop. Good work devlopers Now, I have access to several wireless networks, all do not broadcats ssid, and some require an encryption key. Is there a way to atumate aquiring these? -- U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong Terror - New York Times 9/3/1967 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 16:03:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF9916A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:03:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from bristolsystems.com (h-68-167-239-98.lsanca54.covad.net [68.167.239.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C21A43D48 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:03:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com) Received: from workdog ([192.168.1.201]) by bristolsystems.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jAAG3cn24051; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:03:38 -0800 From: "Gayn Winters" To: "'Ted Mittelstaedt'" , Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:03:28 -0800 Message-ID: <02f301c5e610$4d3a51a0$c901a8c0@workdog> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Status of 6.0 for production systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gayn.winters@bristolsystems.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:03:40 -0000 > There are some things broken in 5.4 that are still broken in 6.0 > with regards to support of older hardware. In particular the ida > driver is a mess - EISA support in that was busted years ago, > then 5.X busted support for more 'modern' systems like the > Compaq 1600R HP "DL" series of systems are kind of a moving > target anyway, unfortunately. For those sytems I still use 4.11 > (in fact I just setup 2 new 4.11 production systems two days ago) > > However, 6.0 is a requirement for currently shipping hardware, in > particular the Intel series of boxed "server" motherboards, if you > want to use raid and sata drives, since Intel seems to like to change > it's motherboard chipsets as fast as most people change their > underpants. > I'm actually building a 6.0 production server today. (5.4 and earlier > will not recognize the disk array) > > It would be nice if we could get more support for SATA raid in > the atacontrol program. > > Ted On the plus side, I've thrown a lot of hardware at FreeBSD with great success. On the other hand, FreeBSD's primary weakness seems to be the support of newer hardware. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised to hear of problems with older hardware as well, and Ted's solution of pairing older hardware with an older release seems reasonable if in fact one has the experience to support the older release. (I don't, since I jumped to FreeBSD at release 5.1.) I recall sos@ complaining (well, at least "mentioning") that his work on ata was hampered by a lack of hardware. I'm sure other developers that support drivers have the same problem. I've been wondering what could be done about this - at least for 6.0++. I assume we don't have enough volume to interest many hardware manufacturers into developing FreeBSD drivers for their hardware. BUT, do our driver developers get early access to specs and (if it would help) source code to other drivers? What would that take? Do we have relationships with hardware manufactures to get samples and prototypes for our driver developers? Or, do we simply have to wait and buy retail versions of the hardware? -gayn Bristol Systems Inc. 714/532-6776 www.bristolsystems.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 16:09:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C7F16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:09:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7021B43D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:09:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peterclutton@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so548432wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:09:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WoFUNKid4vzVIqqZntga2IhvaMeSVP9Bc+i01liBdvfHFjRqMkwmP8T8jbTM34fRxafceQH2ugzZH2KLSreL9RCZZb2rmo9psDUsxlLVUq9CssU7oVlag3b91woqsGswVJnhs7dzkr5AOMIy4QrcYlTMrjzHLVjq3D9rQPgun/k= Received: by 10.70.96.6 with SMTP id t6mr98373wxb; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:10:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.91.17 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:10:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57416b300511091510i25bc4fc8w6d2aed4deb2eb745@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:10:00 +1100 From: Peter Clutton To: Gerard Seibert In-Reply-To: <20051109175132.X20375@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051109175132.X20375@seibercom.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: New boot-up message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:09:33 -0000 On 11/10/05, Gerard Seibert wrote: > Updating KDM configuration > Information: reading old kdmrc /usr/local/share/config/kdm/kdmrc (from kd= e > >=3D 2.2.x) > Information: old kdmrc is from kde >=3D 3.1 (config version 2.3) > how should I go about correcting it? I could be wrong but i think running : pkgdb -F might help, as it seems to be a version thing. But as it's a file and not a port that seems to be the problem, this might not be what you need. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 16:36:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B725F16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BE343D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from mailspool2.panix.com (mailspool2.panix.com [166.84.1.79]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0829D88B for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:36:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp08632294pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.232.106]) by mailspool2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8971621628 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:36:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EaFPW-00031D-00 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:36:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:36:26 -0500 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20051110163626.GC11433@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 11:31:59 up 5 days, 5 min, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.10, 0.16 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Comapq N401C and Wireless LAN W200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:36:29 -0000 I'd like to use my Compaq Wireless LAN W200 card under FreeBSD. This card is a bit odd, in that it's actullay connectd via USB. I appears thet the wi drive may support this card, but I don't see it in ifconfig after booting. Is there soem special magic to get it detected? Herre's my dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #47: Wed Nov 9 14:05:52 CST 2005 root@brown2.fas.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BROWN2 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 1200MHz (1196.14-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 268238848 (261952K bytes) avail memory = 255819776 (249824K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc04ec000. Preloaded elf module "snd_ich.ko" at 0xc04ec09c. Preloaded elf module "snd_pcm.ko" at 0xc04ec13c. Preloaded elf module "linprocfs.ko" at 0xc04ec1dc. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk apm0: on motherboard apm0: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0x60000000-0x6fffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 ohci0: mem 0x40080000-0x40080fff irq 10 at device 2.0 on pci2 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0x40100000-0x40100fff irq 10 at device 2.1 on pci2 usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci2: at 2.2 irq 10 pcic0: mem 0x40180000-0x40180fff irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci2 pcic0: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [speaker enable][pwr save][CSC serial isa irq] pccard0: on pcic0 fxp0: port 0x2000-0x203f mem 0x40000000-0x4001ffff,0x40200000-0x40200fff irq 5 at device 4.0 on pci2 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:59:c6:41:bf inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto pci2: (vendor=0x11c1, dev=0x045c) at 4.1 irq 5 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x4440-0x444f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 irq 11 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pcm0: port 0x4400-0x443f,0x4000-0x40ff irq 11 at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: orm0: