From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 22 4: 9:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0967914BE3 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 04:09:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 10wOQe-000O8x-00; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:09:24 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: John Baldwin Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, David Malone , John Baldwin Subject: Re: Inetd and wrapping. In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Jun 1999 07:04:29 -0400." <199906221108.HAA15869@smtp2.erols.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:09:23 +0200 Message-ID: <92810.930049763@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 07:04:29 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > Because that only controls access, it does not actually turn wrapping off. Let me be more specific; if you don't want ftpd wrapped, just add ftpd: ALL : ALLOW to your /etc/hosts.allow . A stock configuration won't log successful connections, so you won't see any logging at all. Asking for command-line switches and/or inetd.conf directives that allow per-case exclusions seems to me like asking for duplicate functionality that isn't required (or is that tautology? :-). Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message