Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:27:27 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@lansing.dk> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm Makefile Message-ID: <20040304082727.GC23759@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <20040304082500.GE20689@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200403040801.i2481HWd038215@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040304081809.GC20689@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040304082237.GB23759@droso.net> <20040304082500.GE20689@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 03:25:00AM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> (03.04.2004 @ 0322 PST): Erwin Lansing said, in 1.6K: << > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 03:18:09AM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > >> (03.04.2004 @ 0301 PST): Erwin Lansing said, in 0.2K: << > > > > erwin 2004/03/04 00:01:17 PST > > > >=20 > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > >=20 > > > > Modified files: > > > > x11-wm Makefile=20 > > > > Log: > > > > Add missing ion-devel > > > > =20 > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > > 1.147 +1 -0 ports/x11-wm/Makefile > > > >> end of "cvs commit: ports/x11-wm Makefile" from Erwin Lansing << > > >=20 > > > Please back this out. ion-devel was a repocopy for Edwin, who never d= id > > > anything with it. AFAIK ion-devel is still identical to ion. I'm work= ing > > > on an ion2 PR. > > >=20 > > Actually, your commit to modules broke sanity checks. You should also > > fix that: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/CVSROOT-ports/modules.diff?r1=3D1= .9566&r2=3D1.9567&f=3Dh >=20 > Hrmmn... I was hoping just to make ion-devel's path more accessible. I > can back that out easily enough. On second thought, I'll add a comment to Makefile and comment out ion-devel so it is clear why it isn't hooked up to the build. >=20 > > My commit only makes our tree pass sanity checks again, so I'm not going > > to back this out unless the port is removed. >=20 > Won't having two ports with the same PKGNAME cause INDEX builds to fail? >=20 Hmm, it should, but it didn't. -erwin --=20 _._ _,-'""`-._ Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin@lansing.dk http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin@FreeBSD.org -bf- `- \`_`"'- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFARuhvqy9aWxUlaZARAspBAKDi8ooOh/+azEZZNV0yU3B0cM99IQCfTpYI K1Q0DpFk6/X4TP36PHmxDxI= =pULE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040304082727.GC23759>